Some properties of nilpotent groups

Property S, a finiteness property which can hold in infinite groups, was introduced by Stallings and others and shown to hold in free groups. In [2] it was shown to hold in nilpotent groups as a consequence of a technical result of Mal'cev. In that paper this technical result was dubbed propert...

Повний опис

Збережено в:
Бібліографічні деталі
Дата:2018
Автори: Gaglione, Anthony M., Lipschutz, Seymour, Spellman, Dennis
Формат: Стаття
Мова:English
Опубліковано: Lugansk National Taras Shevchenko University 2018
Теми:
Онлайн доступ:https://admjournal.luguniv.edu.ua/index.php/adm/article/view/797
Теги: Додати тег
Немає тегів, Будьте першим, хто поставить тег для цього запису!
Назва журналу:Algebra and Discrete Mathematics

Репозитарії

Algebra and Discrete Mathematics
id admjournalluguniveduua-article-797
record_format ojs
spelling admjournalluguniveduua-article-7972018-04-04T08:49:22Z Some properties of nilpotent groups Gaglione, Anthony M. Lipschutz, Seymour Spellman, Dennis Property S, Property R, commensurable, variety of groups, closure operator 20F18,20F05,20F24,16D10 Property S, a finiteness property which can hold in infinite groups, was introduced by Stallings and others and shown to hold in free groups. In [2] it was shown to hold in nilpotent groups as a consequence of a technical result of Mal'cev. In that paper this technical result was dubbed property R. Hence, more generally, any property R group satisfies property S. In [7] it was shown that property R implies the following (labeled there weak property R) for a group G:If \(G_{0}\) is any subgroup in \(G\) and \(G_{0}^{\ast}\) is any homomorphic image of \(G_{0}\), then the set of torsion elements in \(G_{0}^{\ast}\) forms a locally finite subgroup.It was left as an open question in [7] whether weak property R is equivalent to property R. In this paper we give an explicit counterexample thereby proving that weak property R is strictly weaker than property R. Lugansk National Taras Shevchenko University 2018-04-04 Article Article Peer-reviewed Article application/pdf https://admjournal.luguniv.edu.ua/index.php/adm/article/view/797 Algebra and Discrete Mathematics; Vol 8, No 4 (2009) 2415-721X 1726-3255 en https://admjournal.luguniv.edu.ua/index.php/adm/article/view/797/327 Copyright (c) 2018 Algebra and Discrete Mathematics
institution Algebra and Discrete Mathematics
baseUrl_str
datestamp_date 2018-04-04T08:49:22Z
collection OJS
language English
topic Property S
Property R
commensurable
variety of groups
closure operator
20F18,20F05,20F24,16D10
spellingShingle Property S
Property R
commensurable
variety of groups
closure operator
20F18,20F05,20F24,16D10
Gaglione, Anthony M.
Lipschutz, Seymour
Spellman, Dennis
Some properties of nilpotent groups
topic_facet Property S
Property R
commensurable
variety of groups
closure operator
20F18,20F05,20F24,16D10
format Article
author Gaglione, Anthony M.
Lipschutz, Seymour
Spellman, Dennis
author_facet Gaglione, Anthony M.
Lipschutz, Seymour
Spellman, Dennis
author_sort Gaglione, Anthony M.
title Some properties of nilpotent groups
title_short Some properties of nilpotent groups
title_full Some properties of nilpotent groups
title_fullStr Some properties of nilpotent groups
title_full_unstemmed Some properties of nilpotent groups
title_sort some properties of nilpotent groups
description Property S, a finiteness property which can hold in infinite groups, was introduced by Stallings and others and shown to hold in free groups. In [2] it was shown to hold in nilpotent groups as a consequence of a technical result of Mal'cev. In that paper this technical result was dubbed property R. Hence, more generally, any property R group satisfies property S. In [7] it was shown that property R implies the following (labeled there weak property R) for a group G:If \(G_{0}\) is any subgroup in \(G\) and \(G_{0}^{\ast}\) is any homomorphic image of \(G_{0}\), then the set of torsion elements in \(G_{0}^{\ast}\) forms a locally finite subgroup.It was left as an open question in [7] whether weak property R is equivalent to property R. In this paper we give an explicit counterexample thereby proving that weak property R is strictly weaker than property R.
publisher Lugansk National Taras Shevchenko University
publishDate 2018
url https://admjournal.luguniv.edu.ua/index.php/adm/article/view/797
work_keys_str_mv AT gaglioneanthonym somepropertiesofnilpotentgroups
AT lipschutzseymour somepropertiesofnilpotentgroups
AT spellmandennis somepropertiesofnilpotentgroups
first_indexed 2025-12-02T15:50:23Z
last_indexed 2025-12-02T15:50:23Z
_version_ 1850412235534368768