Thromboelastographic profiles as a tool for thrombotic risk in digestive tract cancer

Background: Quantification of the magnitude of thrombotic risk associated with malignancy and with anti-cancer therapy is indispensable to use anticoagulant drugs which selectively interfere with haemostatic mechanisms protecting patients from venous thromboembolism (VTE) and probably from tumor pro...

Повний опис

Збережено в:
Бібліографічні деталі
Дата:2007
Автори: Papa, M.L., Capasso, F., Pudore, L., Torre, S., Mango, S., Russo, V., Delrio, P., Palaia, R., Ruffolo, F., d’Eufemia, M.D., De Lucia, D., Napolitano, M., Di Micco, P., Parisi, V.
Формат: Стаття
Мова:English
Опубліковано: Інститут експериментальної патології, онкології і радіобіології ім. Р.Є. Кавецького НАН України 2007
Назва видання:Experimental Oncology
Теми:
Онлайн доступ:http://dspace.nbuv.gov.ua/handle/123456789/138581
Теги: Додати тег
Немає тегів, Будьте першим, хто поставить тег для цього запису!
Назва журналу:Digital Library of Periodicals of National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine
Цитувати:Thromboelastographic profiles as a tool for thrombotic risk in digestive tract cancer / M.L. Papa, F. Capasso, L. Pudore, S. Torre, S. Mango, V. Russo, P. Delrio, R. Palaia, F. Ruffolo, M.D. d’Eufemia, D. De Lucia, M. Napolitano, P. Di Micco, V. Parisi // Experimental Oncology. — 2007. — Т. 29, № 2. — С. 111-115. — Бібліогр.: 26 назв. — англ.

Репозиторії

Digital Library of Periodicals of National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine
id irk-123456789-138581
record_format dspace
institution Digital Library of Periodicals of National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine
collection DSpace DC
language English
topic Original contributions
Original contributions
spellingShingle Original contributions
Original contributions
Papa, M.L.
Capasso, F.
Pudore, L.
Torre, S.
Mango, S.
Russo, V.
Delrio, P.
Palaia, R.
Ruffolo, F.
d’Eufemia, M.D.
De Lucia, D.
Napolitano, M.
Di Micco, P.
Parisi, V.
Thromboelastographic profiles as a tool for thrombotic risk in digestive tract cancer
Experimental Oncology
description Background: Quantification of the magnitude of thrombotic risk associated with malignancy and with anti-cancer therapy is indispensable to use anticoagulant drugs which selectively interfere with haemostatic mechanisms protecting patients from venous thromboembolism (VTE) and probably from tumor progression. However, none of activation coagulation markers has any predictive value for the occurrence of the thrombotic events in one individual patient. Current clotting methods can’t reveal the overall dynamic clot formation; in contrast thromboelastographic methods specifically assess overall coagulation kinetics and its strength in whole blood. Aim: Objective of study was to evaluate if the activation of coagulation as eventually revealed by ROTEM® thromboelastometry could assess an hypercoagulable state in surgical neoplastic patients. Patients and Methods: Fifty consecutive patients with carcinoma of the digestive tract in preoperative period (23 M, 27 F aging 61.5 (45–79 years) and 147 healthy subjects (71 M, 76 F) were studied. A recent thromboelastometric method based on thrombelastography after Hartert was employed. Measurements were performed on ROTEM Coagulation Analyzer. The continuous coagulation data from 50 min course were transformed into dynamic velocity profiles of WB clot formation. Results: Standard parameters (CT, CFT, MCF) of cancer patients were similar to controls. CT (in cancer patients): females 50 s (38.3–58.7), males 50 s (42–71.2) vs 51 s (42–59), p = 0.1210 / 53 s (42–74.8), p = 0.1975 (in controls). CFT (in cancer patients): females 72 s (32- 92.4), males 80 s (50.2- 128.7) vs 78 s (62–100), p = 0.0128 / 80 s (59–124.4), p = 0.9384 (in controls). MCF (in cancer patients): females 70 mm (59.9–82.5), males 63 mm (56–73.7) vs 69 mm (59–95.8), p = 0.9911 / 69 mm (53.6–90), p = 0.0135 (in controls). Females showed a higher MaxVel when compared to males. The MaxVel was increased in cancer patients: females 19 mm /100 s (14.3–49.5) males 18 mm / 100 s (11–27) vs 15 mm 100 s (11.8–22), p < 0.001 / 13 mm / 100 s (10–21.8), p < 0.001 in controls .The t-MaxVel was shortened in cancer patients: females 65 s (48.6–112.8), males 81 s (50.1–135.9) vs 115 s (56.8–166), p <0.001 / 115 s (59.8–180.8), p = 0.0002 in controls. The AUC was increased in cancer patients: females 6451 mm 100 (5511–8148), males 5984 mm 100 (5119-6899) vs 5778 mm 100 (4998–6655), p < 0.001 / 5662 mm 100 (4704–6385), p = 0.0105. Conclusion: Unlike other assays measuring variations in a single component during coagulation, the thrombelastographic method records a profile of real-time continuous WB clot formation, and may provide extensive informations on haemostasis in neoplastic patients before surgery.
format Article
author Papa, M.L.
Capasso, F.
Pudore, L.
Torre, S.
Mango, S.
Russo, V.
Delrio, P.
Palaia, R.
Ruffolo, F.
d’Eufemia, M.D.
De Lucia, D.
Napolitano, M.
Di Micco, P.
Parisi, V.
author_facet Papa, M.L.
Capasso, F.
Pudore, L.
Torre, S.
Mango, S.
Russo, V.
Delrio, P.
Palaia, R.
Ruffolo, F.
d’Eufemia, M.D.
De Lucia, D.
Napolitano, M.
Di Micco, P.
Parisi, V.
author_sort Papa, M.L.
title Thromboelastographic profiles as a tool for thrombotic risk in digestive tract cancer
title_short Thromboelastographic profiles as a tool for thrombotic risk in digestive tract cancer
title_full Thromboelastographic profiles as a tool for thrombotic risk in digestive tract cancer
title_fullStr Thromboelastographic profiles as a tool for thrombotic risk in digestive tract cancer
title_full_unstemmed Thromboelastographic profiles as a tool for thrombotic risk in digestive tract cancer
title_sort thromboelastographic profiles as a tool for thrombotic risk in digestive tract cancer
publisher Інститут експериментальної патології, онкології і радіобіології ім. Р.Є. Кавецького НАН України
publishDate 2007
topic_facet Original contributions
url http://dspace.nbuv.gov.ua/handle/123456789/138581
citation_txt Thromboelastographic profiles as a tool for thrombotic risk in digestive tract cancer / M.L. Papa, F. Capasso, L. Pudore, S. Torre, S. Mango, V. Russo, P. Delrio, R. Palaia, F. Ruffolo, M.D. d’Eufemia, D. De Lucia, M. Napolitano, P. Di Micco, V. Parisi // Experimental Oncology. — 2007. — Т. 29, № 2. — С. 111-115. — Бібліогр.: 26 назв. — англ.
series Experimental Oncology
work_keys_str_mv AT papaml thromboelastographicprofilesasatoolforthromboticriskindigestivetractcancer
AT capassof thromboelastographicprofilesasatoolforthromboticriskindigestivetractcancer
AT pudorel thromboelastographicprofilesasatoolforthromboticriskindigestivetractcancer
AT torres thromboelastographicprofilesasatoolforthromboticriskindigestivetractcancer
AT mangos thromboelastographicprofilesasatoolforthromboticriskindigestivetractcancer
AT russov thromboelastographicprofilesasatoolforthromboticriskindigestivetractcancer
AT delriop thromboelastographicprofilesasatoolforthromboticriskindigestivetractcancer
AT palaiar thromboelastographicprofilesasatoolforthromboticriskindigestivetractcancer
AT ruffolof thromboelastographicprofilesasatoolforthromboticriskindigestivetractcancer
AT deufemiamd thromboelastographicprofilesasatoolforthromboticriskindigestivetractcancer
AT deluciad thromboelastographicprofilesasatoolforthromboticriskindigestivetractcancer
AT napolitanom thromboelastographicprofilesasatoolforthromboticriskindigestivetractcancer
AT dimiccop thromboelastographicprofilesasatoolforthromboticriskindigestivetractcancer
AT parisiv thromboelastographicprofilesasatoolforthromboticriskindigestivetractcancer
first_indexed 2023-10-18T21:19:12Z
last_indexed 2023-10-18T21:19:12Z
_version_ 1796152498042437632
spelling irk-123456789-1385812018-06-20T03:03:21Z Thromboelastographic profiles as a tool for thrombotic risk in digestive tract cancer Papa, M.L. Capasso, F. Pudore, L. Torre, S. Mango, S. Russo, V. Delrio, P. Palaia, R. Ruffolo, F. d’Eufemia, M.D. De Lucia, D. Napolitano, M. Di Micco, P. Parisi, V. Original contributions Background: Quantification of the magnitude of thrombotic risk associated with malignancy and with anti-cancer therapy is indispensable to use anticoagulant drugs which selectively interfere with haemostatic mechanisms protecting patients from venous thromboembolism (VTE) and probably from tumor progression. However, none of activation coagulation markers has any predictive value for the occurrence of the thrombotic events in one individual patient. Current clotting methods can’t reveal the overall dynamic clot formation; in contrast thromboelastographic methods specifically assess overall coagulation kinetics and its strength in whole blood. Aim: Objective of study was to evaluate if the activation of coagulation as eventually revealed by ROTEM® thromboelastometry could assess an hypercoagulable state in surgical neoplastic patients. Patients and Methods: Fifty consecutive patients with carcinoma of the digestive tract in preoperative period (23 M, 27 F aging 61.5 (45–79 years) and 147 healthy subjects (71 M, 76 F) were studied. A recent thromboelastometric method based on thrombelastography after Hartert was employed. Measurements were performed on ROTEM Coagulation Analyzer. The continuous coagulation data from 50 min course were transformed into dynamic velocity profiles of WB clot formation. Results: Standard parameters (CT, CFT, MCF) of cancer patients were similar to controls. CT (in cancer patients): females 50 s (38.3–58.7), males 50 s (42–71.2) vs 51 s (42–59), p = 0.1210 / 53 s (42–74.8), p = 0.1975 (in controls). CFT (in cancer patients): females 72 s (32- 92.4), males 80 s (50.2- 128.7) vs 78 s (62–100), p = 0.0128 / 80 s (59–124.4), p = 0.9384 (in controls). MCF (in cancer patients): females 70 mm (59.9–82.5), males 63 mm (56–73.7) vs 69 mm (59–95.8), p = 0.9911 / 69 mm (53.6–90), p = 0.0135 (in controls). Females showed a higher MaxVel when compared to males. The MaxVel was increased in cancer patients: females 19 mm /100 s (14.3–49.5) males 18 mm / 100 s (11–27) vs 15 mm 100 s (11.8–22), p < 0.001 / 13 mm / 100 s (10–21.8), p < 0.001 in controls .The t-MaxVel was shortened in cancer patients: females 65 s (48.6–112.8), males 81 s (50.1–135.9) vs 115 s (56.8–166), p <0.001 / 115 s (59.8–180.8), p = 0.0002 in controls. The AUC was increased in cancer patients: females 6451 mm 100 (5511–8148), males 5984 mm 100 (5119-6899) vs 5778 mm 100 (4998–6655), p < 0.001 / 5662 mm 100 (4704–6385), p = 0.0105. Conclusion: Unlike other assays measuring variations in a single component during coagulation, the thrombelastographic method records a profile of real-time continuous WB clot formation, and may provide extensive informations on haemostasis in neoplastic patients before surgery. Предпосылки исследования количественная оценка риска тромбоза, связанного со злокачественными заболеваниями и противоопухолевой терапией, обязательно включает в себя применение средств-антикоагулянтов, защищающих больного от развития венозной тромбоэмболии (VTE)и возможно п рогрессии заболевания . Тем не менее ни один из маркеров ак- тивации коагуляции не имеет прогностической ценности с точки зрения возможности возникновения тромбоза у каждого отдельно взятого пациента. Современные мето ды оценки свертывания крови не отража ют образование тромба винамике ; наоборот, метод тромбо эластографии дает возможность специфически оценить кинетику свертывания крови целом . Цель: определить, в какой мере активность коагуляции, определяемой методом тромбоэ ластометрии, отражает состояние гиперсвертываемости крови у больных онкологического профиля после хирургического вмешательства. Пациенты и м ды: обследованы 50 больных раком пищ еваритель ного тракта в дооп ерационный п ериод (27 женщин, 23 му жчины, средний возраст 61,5 года (45–79 лет) и 147 здоровых доноров (71 мужчина, 76 женщин). Применяли метод тромбоэластометрии , основанный на тромбоэластографии Гартерта, с использованием анализатора коагуляциифирмыROTEM. Текущие д анные о свертывании за 50 мин измерений представили в виде динамичных профилей вязкости при образовании сгустка крови. Результаты: стандартные параметры (перио д коагуляции (CT), перио д образования сгу стка (CFT), максимал ь ная п лот- ность сгустка (MCF)) больных онкологического п рофиля близки к контроль ным . CT у больных онкологического п рофиля составлял: у женщин — 50 с (38,3–58,7), у му жчин 50 (42–71,2) vs 51 (42–59), p = 0,1210/53 ( 42–74,8 ), p = 0,1975 в контрольной группе . CFT у таких пациентов составлял : у женщин — 72 ( 32–92,4 м жчин – 80 с (50,2–128,7) vs 78 (62–100), p = 0,0128 80 (59–124,4), p = 0,9384 в контрол ьной группе . MCF у больных онкологического п составлял: у женщин — 70 мм (59,9–82,5), у мужчин — 63 мм (56–73,7) vs 69 мм (59–95,8), p = 0,9911 / 69 мм (53,6–90), p = 0,0135 в контрол ьной группе. У женщинпоказатели вязкости крови MaxVel были выше, чем у му жчин . Показатели MaxVel повышены у таких пациентов : у женщин — 19 мм/100 с (14,3–49,5) у му жчин — 18 мм/100 (11–27 ) vs 15 мм / 100 (11,8–22), p < 0,001 / 13 мм / 100 с (10–21,8), p <0,001 в контрол ьной группе. ь t-MaxVel понижен у больных онкологического профиля: у женщин – 65 с (48,6–112,8) , у мужчин – 81 с (50,1–135,9) vs 115 с (56,8–166), p < 0,001 / 115 с (59,8–180,8), p = 0,0002 в контрольной группе. Показатель AUC у повышен у женщин — 6451 мм 100 (5511–8148), у мужчин — 5984 мм 100 (5119–6899) vs 5778 мм 100 (4998–6655), p < 0,001 / 5662 мм 100 (4704–6385), p = 0.0105. Выводы в отличие от других мето дов, измеря ющих вариации отдельных комп онентов системы крови, метод тромбо эластографии отражает текущийп рофиль образования сгу сткав режиме реаль ного времени является информативным споссобом оценки состояния гемостаза у онкологических больных. 2007 Article Thromboelastographic profiles as a tool for thrombotic risk in digestive tract cancer / M.L. Papa, F. Capasso, L. Pudore, S. Torre, S. Mango, V. Russo, P. Delrio, R. Palaia, F. Ruffolo, M.D. d’Eufemia, D. De Lucia, M. Napolitano, P. Di Micco, V. Parisi // Experimental Oncology. — 2007. — Т. 29, № 2. — С. 111-115. — Бібліогр.: 26 назв. — англ. 1812-9269 http://dspace.nbuv.gov.ua/handle/123456789/138581 en Experimental Oncology Інститут експериментальної патології, онкології і радіобіології ім. Р.Є. Кавецького НАН України