Survival rates of familial and sporadic prostate cancer patients

Aim: To compare cancer-specific survival rates for familial and sporadic prostate cancer patients. Materials and Methods: Gleason score and age at diagnosis of familial group and sporadic group were compared by χ² and t-test. Cancer-specific survival rates were analyzed by the Kaplan — Meier method...

Повний опис

Збережено в:
Бібліографічні деталі
Дата:2015
Автори: Plonis, J., Nakazawa-Miklasevica, M., Malevskis, A., Vaganovs, P., Pildava, S., Vjaters, E., Gardovskis, J., Miklasevics, E.
Формат: Стаття
Мова:English
Опубліковано: Інститут експериментальної патології, онкології і радіобіології ім. Р.Є. Кавецького НАН України 2015
Назва видання:Experimental Oncology
Теми:
Онлайн доступ:http://dspace.nbuv.gov.ua/handle/123456789/145473
Теги: Додати тег
Немає тегів, Будьте першим, хто поставить тег для цього запису!
Назва журналу:Digital Library of Periodicals of National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine
Цитувати:Survival rates of familial and sporadic prostate cancer patients / J. Plonis, M. Nakazawa-Miklasevica, A. Malevskis, P. Vaganovs, S. Pildava, E. Vjaters, J. Gardovskis, E. Miklasevics // Experimental Oncology. — 2015. — Т. 37, № 2. — С. 154-155. — Бібліогр.: 12 назв. — англ.

Репозитарії

Digital Library of Periodicals of National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine
Опис
Резюме:Aim: To compare cancer-specific survival rates for familial and sporadic prostate cancer patients. Materials and Methods: Gleason score and age at diagnosis of familial group and sporadic group were compared by χ² and t-test. Cancer-specific survival rates were analyzed by the Kaplan — Meier method and compared by log-rank test. Statistically significant level was set at p < 0.05. Results: Among 1175 prostate cancer patients, familial group consisted of 215 (18.3%) patients, the sporadic group consisted of 960 (81.7%) patients. The familial group patient’s mean age at diagnosis (58.9 years old, 95% confidence interval (CI) 57.8–60.1) was significantly younger than that of sporadic group patients (67.2 years old, 95% CI 66.7–67.6) (p < 0.0001). Comparing Gleason score between familial group and sporadic group revealed no statistically significant difference. The analysis showed that 92% (95% CI 0.88–0.97) of familial group patients had a 10-year cancer-specific survival rates, which was a significantly better outcome than that of sporadic group with 69% (95% CI 0.60–0.78) 10-year cancer-specific survival rates (p = 0.0237). Conclusion: The study data demonstrate statistically significant difference between familial group and sporadic group concerning age and cancer-specific survival rates, but not Gleason score. Key Words: prostate cancer, hereditary, familial, survival rates.