2025-02-22T12:45:05-05:00 DEBUG: VuFindSearch\Backend\Solr\Connector: Query fl=%2A&wt=json&json.nl=arrarr&q=id%3A%22irk-123456789-152918%22&qt=morelikethis&rows=5
2025-02-22T12:45:05-05:00 DEBUG: VuFindSearch\Backend\Solr\Connector: => GET http://localhost:8983/solr/biblio/select?fl=%2A&wt=json&json.nl=arrarr&q=id%3A%22irk-123456789-152918%22&qt=morelikethis&rows=5
2025-02-22T12:45:05-05:00 DEBUG: VuFindSearch\Backend\Solr\Connector: <= 200 OK
2025-02-22T12:45:05-05:00 DEBUG: Deserialized SOLR response
Comparative analysis of nuclear localization signal (NLS) prediction methods
Aim. Comparative analysis of six state-of-the-art nuclear localization signal (NLS) prediction methods (PSORT II, NucPred, cNLSMapper, NLStradamus, NucImport and seqNLS). Methods. Each program was tested for correct predictions using a dataset of 155 experimentally determined NLSs and for false-posi...
Saved in:
Main Authors: | , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Інститут молекулярної біології і генетики НАН України
2017
|
Series: | Вiopolymers and Cell |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://dspace.nbuv.gov.ua/handle/123456789/152918 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | Aim. Comparative analysis of six state-of-the-art nuclear localization signal (NLS) prediction methods (PSORT II, NucPred, cNLSMapper, NLStradamus, NucImport and seqNLS). Methods. Each program was tested for correct predictions using a dataset of 155 experimentally determined NLSs and for false-positives using a dataset of 155 transmembrane proteins, which putatively lack NLS. Results. The most suitable NLS predictors wer fond to be NucPred, NLStradamus and seqNLS; these programs provide the maximum rate of correct to wrong predictions among the tested programs. However, the best results obtained by these programs were only ~ 45 % of the correct predictions. Conclusion. The identification of novel NLSs by predictors still requires experimental verification. |
---|