Selecting model for treatmentof oily wastewater by MF-PAC hybrid process using mullite-alumina ceramic membranes

Hermia’s models for cross flow filtration were used to investigate the fouling mechanisms of mullite-alumina ceramic membranes in treatment of oily wastewaters in a hybrid microfiltration-powdered activated carbon process (MF-PAC). Results show that cake filtration model can be applied for predictio...

Повний опис

Збережено в:
Бібліографічні деталі
Дата:2016
Автори: Mohsen Abbasi, Aboozar Taheri
Формат: Стаття
Мова:English
Опубліковано: Інститут колоїдної хімії та хімії води ім. А.В. Думанського НАН України 2016
Назва видання:Химия и технология воды
Теми:
Онлайн доступ:http://dspace.nbuv.gov.ua/handle/123456789/160801
Теги: Додати тег
Немає тегів, Будьте першим, хто поставить тег для цього запису!
Назва журналу:Digital Library of Periodicals of National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine
Цитувати:Selecting model for treatmentof oily wastewater by MF-PAC hybrid process using mullite-alumina ceramic membranes / Mohsen Abbasi, Aboozar Taheri // Химия и технология воды. — 2016. — Т. 38, № 3. — С. 311-323. — Бібліогр.: 18 назв. — рос.

Репозитарії

Digital Library of Periodicals of National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine
Опис
Резюме:Hermia’s models for cross flow filtration were used to investigate the fouling mechanisms of mullite-alumina ceramic membranes in treatment of oily wastewaters in a hybrid microfiltration-powdered activated carbon process (MF-PAC). Results show that cake filtration model can be applied for prediction of permeation flux decline for MF and MF-PAC process up to 400 ppm PAC. The complete pore blocking model and the intermediate pore blocking model can predict permeation flux decline with time for MF-PAC with 800 and 1200 ppm PAC respectively. Average error for prediction of permeation flux with cake filtration model is 2.19% for MF process and 2.16; 2.06 and 1.31% for MF-PAC process with 100; 200 and 400 ppm PAC respectively. Also for MF-PAC process with 800 and 1200 ppm PAC, average error for prediction of permeation flux with complete pore blocking model and intermediate pore blocking model was 6.11 and 6% respectively.