Scientometrics: A Tool for Monitoring and Support of Research
The origins of scientometrics (research metrics) are discussed. The approaches to research evaluation are reviewed, and the tendency to replacing formal quantitative indicators by expert review based on bibliometric indicators is emphasized. The principles of “Leiden Manifesto of Scientometrics” are...
Збережено в:
Дата: | 2015 |
---|---|
Автори: | , , , , , |
Формат: | Стаття |
Мова: | English |
Опубліковано: |
Центр досліджень науково-технічного потенціалу та історії науки ім. Г.М. Доброва НАН України
2015
|
Назва видання: | Наука та наукознавство |
Теми: | |
Онлайн доступ: | http://dspace.nbuv.gov.ua/handle/123456789/162535 |
Теги: |
Додати тег
Немає тегів, Будьте першим, хто поставить тег для цього запису!
|
Назва журналу: | Digital Library of Periodicals of National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine |
Цитувати: | Scientometrics: A Tool for Monitoring and Support of Research / L. Kostenko, A. Zhabin, A. Kuznetsov, T. Lukashevich, E. Kukharchuk, T. Simonenko // Наука та наукознавство. — 2015. — № 3. — С. 88-94. — Бібліогр.: 22 назв. — англ. |
Репозитарії
Digital Library of Periodicals of National Academy of Sciences of UkraineРезюме: | The origins of scientometrics (research metrics) are discussed. The approaches to research evaluation are reviewed, and the tendency to replacing formal quantitative indicators by expert review based on bibliometric indicators is emphasized. The principles of “Leiden Manifesto of Scientometrics” are set out, providing for transparent monitoring and support of research and encouraging constructive dialog between the scientific community and the public. The methodological framework and the peculiarities of implementation of the information and analytical system “Bibliometryka Ukrayinskoyi Nauky” (“Bibliometrics of the Ukrainian Science”), constructed by the Vernadsky National Library of Ukraine, are shown. The proposals on creating advisory councils, responsible for formulating conclusions on the research effectiveness of institutions, are given. The feasibility of building a common platform for expert evaluation of research for the Eastern Partnership Countries by launching similar bibliometric projects in these countries and their further convergence is considered. |
---|