Mole-rats Nannospalax leucodon and Spalax zemni in Ukraine: identification criteria and border between their ranges

The differences between two mole-rat species are shown according to the complex of exterior and cranial characters, each of which is reliable in species diagnostics. In particular, they include the color of rhinarium, shape of the rostrum, development of lateral occipital apertures and pharyngeal tu...

Повний опис

Збережено в:
Бібліографічні деталі
Дата:2017
Автори: Zagorodniuk, I., Korobchenko, M., Kirichenko, V.
Формат: Стаття
Мова:English
Опубліковано: Національний науково-природничий музей НАН України 2017
Назва видання:Праці теріологічної школи
Теми:
Онлайн доступ:http://dspace.nbuv.gov.ua/handle/123456789/165941
Теги: Додати тег
Немає тегів, Будьте першим, хто поставить тег для цього запису!
Назва журналу:Digital Library of Periodicals of National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine
Цитувати:Mole-rats Nannospalax leucodon and Spalax zemni in Ukraine: identification criteria and border between their ranges / I. Zagorodniuk, M. Korobchenko, V. Kirichenko // Праці Теріологічної школи. — 2017. — Т. 15: Теріологічні дослідження 2017. — С. 97-104. — Бібліогр.: 14 назв. — англ.

Репозиторії

Digital Library of Periodicals of National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine
Опис
Резюме:The differences between two mole-rat species are shown according to the complex of exterior and cranial characters, each of which is reliable in species diagnostics. In particular, they include the color of rhinarium, shape of the rostrum, development of lateral occipital apertures and pharyngeal tubules, also the flexion of the base of the skull, and expressiveness of the intercrestal fossa in the mandible. A number of collection materials were re-identified, which significantly changed the views on geographical ranges of these species. The boundary between species should be considered substantially shifted to the west: the Bug–Tylihul interriver area is inhabited not by N. leucodon, as it was believed so far, but by S. zemni. It is confirmed by both old specimens (1930–1950s) and modern materials (2010–2016), thus it is not associated with habitat changes. At the same time, monitoring of the dynamics of settlements of these species shows significant changes in the scope of inhabited areas, as well as recent colonization of the most part of the region from coastal refugia.