History of Relations of Masonry and Russian Orthodox Church in the Late Eighteenth – Early Twentieth Centuries
The purpose of this study is an impartial in-depth analysis of the relations between freemasons and the Russian Orthodox Church from the late 18 to the early 20 century. The research methodology is based on the principles of historicism, comprehensiveness and interdisciplinarity. The author uses...
Збережено в:
Дата: | 2019 |
---|---|
Автори: | , |
Формат: | Стаття |
Мова: | English |
Опубліковано: |
Інститут історії України НАН України
2019
|
Назва видання: | Український історичний журнал |
Теми: | |
Онлайн доступ: | http://dspace.nbuv.gov.ua/handle/123456789/179482 |
Теги: |
Додати тег
Немає тегів, Будьте першим, хто поставить тег для цього запису!
|
Назва журналу: | Digital Library of Periodicals of National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine |
Цитувати: | History of Relations of Masonry and Russian Orthodox Church in the Late Eighteenth – Early Twentieth Centuries // Український історичний журнал. — 2019. — № 4. — C. 118-134. — Бібліогр.: 22 назв. — англ. |
Репозитарії
Digital Library of Periodicals of National Academy of Sciences of UkraineРезюме: | The purpose of this study is an impartial in-depth analysis of the
relations between freemasons and the Russian Orthodox Church from the late 18 to
the early 20 century. The research methodology is based on the principles of
historicism, comprehensiveness and interdisciplinarity. The author uses a wide range
of general scientific (analysis and synthesis, generalization) and specially-historical
(critical analysis of sources, retrospective, historical-genetic, problem-chronological)
methods. The scientific novelty. The paper is the first attempt to study the relations
of Masonry and the Russian Orthodox Church in the late 18 – early 20 centuries. Only
some of the aspects of this issue have been reflected in the academic literature. The
authors introduces archival documents and fundamental works. Conclusions.
The authors concludes that there were difficult relationships between Catholic Church
and the Masons. The conflict arose, however, not on the basis of Masonic atheism,
because Freemasonry considered religion as an important element of the ideological
influence on the peoples, while not giving preference to any doctrine, arguing that
all religions are equal, equally transient and imperfect. However, despite the serious
differences in the ideologies, in the late 18 – early 19 centuries the Catholic Church
and Polish Freemasonry went for a rapprochement for political reasons – to fight
for the independence of the Commonwealth. The conflict between the Masons and
the Orthodox clergy did not reach such a degree of acuteness that it had in Western
European countries between the Catholic Church and the Masonic organization.
To a large extent, this was the result of a more tolerant attitude of Orthodoxy to
dissidence and the complete administrative dependence of this denomination on the
state. Even during the reign of Catherine II, Paul I and especially Alexander I, highranking
officials belonged to the Masonic organization. The indulgent attitude of the
tsarist government to “Royal Art” ceased when it appeared that this organization
was involved in political conspiracies against autocracy and national liberation
movements. But, despite the strict measures taken by the imperial authorities against
the Masonic organization, the lodges continued to exist, but they functioned more
secretly. Freemasonry in the 18–19 centuries did not play a leading role in the
public-political life of the Russian Empire, including the Right Bank Ukraine but it
significantly influenced it. “Royal Art” apparently prepared society for the acceptance
of constitutional and republican ideas, the abolition of serfdom and significantly
affected the ideological growth of future generations of both the Russian and Ukrainian
intelligentsia. In the early 20 century freemasons in Ukraine were much more active
in political respect than in Russia. It is no coincidence that the Ukrainian freemasons
put forward the idea to leave the former mystical nonsense and fully concentrate their
efforts on the political struggle. Although political Freemasonry destroyed autocracy,
it could not overcome its fractional disunity and eventually yielded to more organized
and politically far-sighted Bolsheviks. |
---|