Differing Mentalities of Civil Law and Common Law? The Issue of Logic in Law
In language use, ‘rule’ and ‘norm’ are mostly taken as synonymous to one another. Actually they may denote the same but from differing points of view: the former from the one of signaling that there is a normative message made available and the latter from the one of the logically processed conceptu...
Збережено в:
| Дата: | 2009 |
|---|---|
| Автор: | |
| Формат: | Стаття |
| Мова: | English |
| Опубліковано: |
Інститут держави і права ім. В.М. Корецького НАН України
2009
|
| Назва видання: | Порівняльно-правові дослідження |
| Теми: | |
| Онлайн доступ: | http://dspace.nbuv.gov.ua/handle/123456789/18342 |
| Теги: |
Додати тег
Немає тегів, Будьте першим, хто поставить тег для цього запису!
|
| Назва журналу: | Digital Library of Periodicals of National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine |
| Цитувати: | Differing Mentalities of Civil Law and Common Law? The Issue of Logic in Law / C. Varga // Порівняльно-правові дослідження. — 2009. — № 1. — С. 29-35. — англ. |
Репозитарії
Digital Library of Periodicals of National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine| Резюме: | In language use, ‘rule’ and ‘norm’ are mostly taken as synonymous to one another. Actually they may denote the same but from differing points of view: the former from the one of signaling that there is a normative message made available and the latter from the one of the logically processed conceptual embodiment of such a message. As norms presuppose an axiomatic ideal of conceptualizing and logifying the law, they are at home only in the regimes of Civil Law where they are construed to form a Rechtsdogmatik. (For, in contrast to it, Common Law is mostly casual exemplification.) Or, the norm is a logical unit indeed, while the rule is a proposition. Accordingly, reconstruction can as well reveal that no norm or several norms are in fact expressed by a given rule. |
|---|