"The Sacrificed Army" – the Hungarian 2nd Army Between Memory and History

• Дата: 2021
• Автор: Fóris, A.
• Формат: Стаття
• Мова: English
• Опубліковано: Інститут історії України НАН України 2021
• Назва видання: Міжнародні зв’язки України: наукові пошуки і знахідки
• Теми: З історії міжнародних відносин
• Онлайн доступ: http://dspace.nbuv.gov.ua/handle/123456789/188860
• Назва журналу: Digital Library of Periodicals of National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine
• Цитувати: "The Sacrificed Army" – the Hungarian 2nd Army Between Memory and History / A. Fóris // Міжнародні зв’язки України: наукові пошуки і знахідки: міжвід. зб. наук. пр. — 2021. — Вип. 30. — С. 304-324. — Бібліогр.: 46 назв. — англ.

The fate of the Hungarian 2nd Army has a significant role in the Hungarian memory. The army was sent to the Eastern Front in 1942 suffered one of the great defeats of the Hungarian military history during the Soviet counter-offensive in January 1943. During the past almost 80 years, different narratives have emerged about it were evolved in the Hungarian public. In the paper the author shall analyse the most significant elements of these narratives. Firstly, there will be examined the genesis and underlying causes of the decision to send the 2nd Army to the Eastern front. The author counter a popular post-war myth that the Hungarian leadership sent out the Hungarian soldiers and labour servicemen with the intention of sacrifice that it could limit Hungary's involvement in the German war effort. Although the Hungarian military leadership discriminated against various social groups (primarily of individuals of Jewish descent, non-Hungarian nationalities) in military service, they did not aim to destroy them. Similarly, the higher proportion of reserve officers and lower social classes (peasantry, workpeople) in the army was misinterpreted. In the second part of the paper the author will examine the interpretations of the defeat in January 1943. As a part of this topic there will be shown how the public opinion and survivors overstated the loss data and the temperature conditions of “the Russian winter.” In addition, the author scrutinize the fighting and withdrawal in January 1943 from the viewpoint of the military discipline. Finally, he analyse the interpretations of two orders. The army commander, Colonel General Jány wrote in his order on 24 January that “the 2nd Army has lost its honour.” Although later he withdrew this order, it became the symbol of the barbarity and betrayal of the Hungarian military elite against the Hungarian soldiers. It received a different opinion on the order of the commander of the III Corps of 1 February 1943, in which Major General Stomm disbanded his formation - which was unprecedented in Hungarian history.