История контент-анализа: версии и безмолвствующие импликации
The status of content analysis in modern scientific discourse is practically indisputable. It is here that the danger is hidden: being in the beginning easy to identify and undoubtedly new m ethod, in future content analysis seized to be both purely quantitative and exceptionally modern: the number...
Збережено в:
| Дата: | 2008 |
|---|---|
| Автор: | |
| Формат: | Стаття |
| Мова: | Russian |
| Опубліковано: |
Інститут історії України НАН України
2008
|
| Теми: | |
| Онлайн доступ: | http://dspace.nbuv.gov.ua/handle/123456789/5748 |
| Теги: |
Додати тег
Немає тегів, Будьте першим, хто поставить тег для цього запису!
|
| Назва журналу: | Digital Library of Periodicals of National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine |
| Цитувати: | История контент-анализа: версии и безмолвствующие импликации / В. Осин // Ейдос. Альманах теорії та історії історичної науки. — К., 2008. — Вип. 3. — С. 252-283. — рос. |
Репозиторії
Digital Library of Periodicals of National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine| Резюме: | The status of content analysis in modern scientific discourse is practically indisputable. It is here that the danger is hidden: being in the beginning easy to identify and undoubtedly new m ethod, in future content analysis seized to be both purely quantitative and exceptionally modern: the number of its variations is countless and its main elements can be found as far back as ancient times. Thus, the determination of the degree of scientific validity of content analysis in contemporary circumstances presupposes the deconstruction of its practice of history -writing as the first step. It must help to find out the actual factors that have made content analysis the established scientific method. |
|---|