2025-02-23T18:53:09-05:00 DEBUG: VuFindSearch\Backend\Solr\Connector: Query fl=%2A&wt=json&json.nl=arrarr&q=id%3A%22irk-123456789-5941%22&qt=morelikethis&rows=5
2025-02-23T18:53:09-05:00 DEBUG: VuFindSearch\Backend\Solr\Connector: => GET http://localhost:8983/solr/biblio/select?fl=%2A&wt=json&json.nl=arrarr&q=id%3A%22irk-123456789-5941%22&qt=morelikethis&rows=5
2025-02-23T18:53:09-05:00 DEBUG: VuFindSearch\Backend\Solr\Connector: <= 200 OK
2025-02-23T18:53:09-05:00 DEBUG: Deserialized SOLR response

Неконсистентный и маргинальный — два определения одного статуса

Inconsistency and marginality are considered in modern sociology as different and unrelated phenomena, each of which has its own history of elaboration, conceptual and methodical principles. G.Lenski was first who have paid proper attention to these phenomena and noticed, that an individual with low...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Матусевич, В.
Format: Article
Language:Ukrainian
Russian
Published: Iнститут соціології НАН України 2009
Online Access:http://dspace.nbuv.gov.ua/handle/123456789/5941
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id irk-123456789-5941
record_format dspace
spelling irk-123456789-59412010-02-12T12:00:56Z Неконсистентный и маргинальный — два определения одного статуса Матусевич, В. Inconsistency and marginality are considered in modern sociology as different and unrelated phenomena, each of which has its own history of elaboration, conceptual and methodical principles. G.Lenski was first who have paid proper attention to these phenomena and noticed, that an individual with low consistent status is marginal with characteristic for him social and psychological features. In the sequel, this thesis seems to be falling on deaf ears with a view to conceptual comprehension and proper methodical embodiment. So, it did not result in studies of inconsistency and marginality as distinct but coherent descriptions of one status. In the article, an attempt to comprehend this connection as typically-causal is undertaken. The inconsistency is interpreted as a cause, and marginality is viewed as a result within this relation. At the same time, they both are understood as two definitions one status. Such approach makes it possible to unite theoretical and methodical facilities of these trend of research, as well as to trace the influence of separate descriptions of inconsistency on derived from them features of marginality. In particular, it results in dualism of marginal status, its similarity with other abutting upon him statuses by some status characteristics, dualism of attitudes of its bearers. The adjusted causal relation between inconsistency and marginality point out the perspective of further studies on this subject matter. 2009 Article Неконсистентный и маргинальный — два определения одного статуса / В. Матусевич // Социология: теория, методы, маркетинг. — 2009. — № 2. — С. 104-112. — Бібліогр.: 8 назв. — рос. 1563-4426 http://dspace.nbuv.gov.ua/handle/123456789/5941 uk ru Iнститут соціології НАН України
institution Digital Library of Periodicals of National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine
collection DSpace DC
language Ukrainian
Russian
description Inconsistency and marginality are considered in modern sociology as different and unrelated phenomena, each of which has its own history of elaboration, conceptual and methodical principles. G.Lenski was first who have paid proper attention to these phenomena and noticed, that an individual with low consistent status is marginal with characteristic for him social and psychological features. In the sequel, this thesis seems to be falling on deaf ears with a view to conceptual comprehension and proper methodical embodiment. So, it did not result in studies of inconsistency and marginality as distinct but coherent descriptions of one status. In the article, an attempt to comprehend this connection as typically-causal is undertaken. The inconsistency is interpreted as a cause, and marginality is viewed as a result within this relation. At the same time, they both are understood as two definitions one status. Such approach makes it possible to unite theoretical and methodical facilities of these trend of research, as well as to trace the influence of separate descriptions of inconsistency on derived from them features of marginality. In particular, it results in dualism of marginal status, its similarity with other abutting upon him statuses by some status characteristics, dualism of attitudes of its bearers. The adjusted causal relation between inconsistency and marginality point out the perspective of further studies on this subject matter.
format Article
author Матусевич, В.
spellingShingle Матусевич, В.
Неконсистентный и маргинальный — два определения одного статуса
author_facet Матусевич, В.
author_sort Матусевич, В.
title Неконсистентный и маргинальный — два определения одного статуса
title_short Неконсистентный и маргинальный — два определения одного статуса
title_full Неконсистентный и маргинальный — два определения одного статуса
title_fullStr Неконсистентный и маргинальный — два определения одного статуса
title_full_unstemmed Неконсистентный и маргинальный — два определения одного статуса
title_sort неконсистентный и маргинальный — два определения одного статуса
publisher Iнститут соціології НАН України
publishDate 2009
url http://dspace.nbuv.gov.ua/handle/123456789/5941
citation_txt Неконсистентный и маргинальный — два определения одного статуса / В. Матусевич // Социология: теория, методы, маркетинг. — 2009. — № 2. — С. 104-112. — Бібліогр.: 8 назв. — рос.
work_keys_str_mv AT matusevičv nekonsistentnyjimarginalʹnyjdvaopredeleniâodnogostatusa
first_indexed 2023-10-18T16:33:59Z
last_indexed 2023-10-18T16:33:59Z
_version_ 1796139322764689408