Відкритий політичний світ — прихований демократичний етос
Plato's formula of the domination of intellect in society implies that only those who have and use true knowledge of the common good should actively participate in rational politics. Now Plato's formula legitimizes authorities that rely entirely on expert knowledge. Critics of «open societ...
Збережено в:
| Дата: | 2009 |
|---|---|
| Автор: | |
| Формат: | Стаття |
| Мова: | Ukrainian |
| Опубліковано: |
Інститут філософії ім. Г.С. Сковороди НАН України
2009
|
| Теми: | |
| Онлайн доступ: | http://dspace.nbuv.gov.ua/handle/123456789/7807 |
| Теги: |
Додати тег
Немає тегів, Будьте першим, хто поставить тег для цього запису!
|
| Назва журналу: | Digital Library of Periodicals of National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine |
| Цитувати: | Відкритий політичний світ — прихований демократичний етос / А. Богачов // Філософ. думка. — 2009. — № 1. — С. 80-95. — Бібліогр.: 15 назв. — укр. |
Репозитарії
Digital Library of Periodicals of National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine| id |
irk-123456789-7807 |
|---|---|
| record_format |
dspace |
| spelling |
irk-123456789-78072010-04-14T12:01:21Z Відкритий політичний світ — прихований демократичний етос Богачов, А. Феноменологiя сьогоднi Plato's formula of the domination of intellect in society implies that only those who have and use true knowledge of the common good should actively participate in rational politics. Now Plato's formula legitimizes authorities that rely entirely on expert knowledge. Critics of «open society's enemies» often assume that the domination of the intellect is a matter of public governing. The author calls this equality of the intellect's authority and publicity «Habermas' formula», since the interpretation of the openness of the democratic world as the publicity of the intellect is attributed to this thinker. This article explores the connection between Plato's and Habermas' formulas to ultimately show the reasons why philosophy of intellectual domination fails to fully explain the openness of democracy as a just world. The author uses some ideas of the phenomenology of the political world that has been proposed by K. Held. The main proposition is as follows: a democratic society cannot be open if its democratic ethos isn't hidden; justice arises from the unity of openness and hiddenness, that is, it is not a product of intellectual arguments. There isn't any reason to attenuate this proposition with Held's idea of the world ethos. In this paper the author focuses on the ineluctability of the personal and lingual cultural horizon for political arguments. 2009 Article Відкритий політичний світ — прихований демократичний етос / А. Богачов // Філософ. думка. — 2009. — № 1. — С. 80-95. — Бібліогр.: 15 назв. — укр. 0235-7941 http://dspace.nbuv.gov.ua/handle/123456789/7807 uk Інститут філософії ім. Г.С. Сковороди НАН України |
| institution |
Digital Library of Periodicals of National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine |
| collection |
DSpace DC |
| language |
Ukrainian |
| topic |
Феноменологiя сьогоднi Феноменологiя сьогоднi |
| spellingShingle |
Феноменологiя сьогоднi Феноменологiя сьогоднi Богачов, А. Відкритий політичний світ — прихований демократичний етос |
| description |
Plato's formula of the domination of intellect in society implies that only those who have and use true knowledge of the common good should actively participate in rational politics. Now Plato's formula legitimizes authorities that rely entirely on expert knowledge. Critics of «open society's enemies» often assume that the domination of the intellect is a matter of public governing. The author calls this equality of the intellect's authority and publicity «Habermas' formula», since the interpretation of the openness of the democratic world as the publicity of the intellect is attributed to this thinker. This article explores the connection between Plato's and Habermas' formulas to ultimately show the reasons why philosophy of intellectual domination fails to fully explain the openness of democracy as a just world. The author uses some ideas of the phenomenology of the political world that has been proposed by K. Held. The main proposition is as follows: a democratic society cannot be open if its democratic ethos isn't hidden; justice arises from the unity of openness and hiddenness, that is, it is not a product of intellectual arguments. There isn't any reason to attenuate this proposition with Held's idea of the world ethos. In this paper the author focuses on the ineluctability of the personal and lingual cultural horizon for political arguments. |
| format |
Article |
| author |
Богачов, А. |
| author_facet |
Богачов, А. |
| author_sort |
Богачов, А. |
| title |
Відкритий політичний світ — прихований демократичний етос |
| title_short |
Відкритий політичний світ — прихований демократичний етос |
| title_full |
Відкритий політичний світ — прихований демократичний етос |
| title_fullStr |
Відкритий політичний світ — прихований демократичний етос |
| title_full_unstemmed |
Відкритий політичний світ — прихований демократичний етос |
| title_sort |
відкритий політичний світ — прихований демократичний етос |
| publisher |
Інститут філософії ім. Г.С. Сковороди НАН України |
| publishDate |
2009 |
| topic_facet |
Феноменологiя сьогоднi |
| url |
http://dspace.nbuv.gov.ua/handle/123456789/7807 |
| citation_txt |
Відкритий політичний світ — прихований демократичний етос / А. Богачов // Філософ. думка. — 2009. — № 1. — С. 80-95. — Бібліогр.: 15 назв. — укр. |
| work_keys_str_mv |
AT bogačova vídkritijpolítičnijsvítprihovanijdemokratičnijetos |
| first_indexed |
2023-10-18T16:38:22Z |
| last_indexed |
2023-10-18T16:38:22Z |
| _version_ |
1796139505165533184 |