Избирательное сродство в социологии Макса Вебера
Although being central to the understanding Weber’s idea of interpretative socialsciences, the notion of elective affinity is conspiciously absent from sociological theory debates, especially in Ukraine. This paper offers a systematic account of “elective affinity” in Weber’s corpus. The essay trace...
Збережено в:
| Видавець: | Iнститут соціології НАН України |
|---|---|
| Дата: | 1999 |
| Автор: | |
| Формат: | Стаття |
| Мова: | Russian |
| Опубліковано: |
Iнститут соціології НАН України
1999
|
| Назва видання: | Социология: теория, методы, маркетинг |
| Онлайн доступ: | http://dspace.nbuv.gov.ua/handle/123456789/89501 |
| Теги: |
Додати тег
Немає тегів, Будьте першим, хто поставить тег для цього запису!
|
| Цитувати: | Избирательное сродство в социологии Макса Вебера / П. Кутуев // Социология: теория, методы, маркетинг. — 1999. — № 3. — С. 136-148. — Бібліогр.: 23 назв. — рос. |
Репозиторії
Digital Library of Periodicals of National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine| id |
irk-123456789-89501 |
|---|---|
| record_format |
dspace |
| spelling |
irk-123456789-895012015-12-14T03:02:02Z Избирательное сродство в социологии Макса Вебера Кутуев, П. Although being central to the understanding Weber’s idea of interpretative socialsciences, the notion of elective affinity is conspiciously absent from sociological theory debates, especially in Ukraine. This paper offers a systematic account of “elective affinity” in Weber’s corpus. The essay traces the history of the term fromchemistry through philosophy and literature to Weber’s sociology drawing upon Weber’s sporadic and unsystematic usage and application of “elective affinity” in “Economy and Society” as well as his studies on sociology of religion and domination. The article is seeking to demonstrate that the concept of elective affinity enabled Weber to appreciate the autonomous nature of societal spheres and develophis theorizing against the backdrop of modern sociology. Contrary to the assumptions of historical materialism, Weber held that economic determination of social action isambiguous since the forms of social action follow “laws of their own”. Thus, according to Weber, the social scientist can generalize about the degree of elective affinity between concrete structures of social action and concrete forms of economic organization. In other words, the scholar can only state whether the phenomena in question are “adequate” or “inadequate” in relation to one another. 1999 Article Избирательное сродство в социологии Макса Вебера / П. Кутуев // Социология: теория, методы, маркетинг. — 1999. — № 3. — С. 136-148. — Бібліогр.: 23 назв. — рос. 1563-4426 http://dspace.nbuv.gov.ua/handle/123456789/89501 ru Социология: теория, методы, маркетинг Iнститут соціології НАН України |
| institution |
Digital Library of Periodicals of National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine |
| collection |
DSpace DC |
| language |
Russian |
| description |
Although being central to the understanding Weber’s idea of interpretative socialsciences, the notion of elective affinity is conspiciously absent from sociological theory debates, especially in Ukraine. This paper offers a systematic account of “elective affinity” in Weber’s corpus. The essay traces the history of the term fromchemistry through philosophy and literature to Weber’s sociology drawing upon Weber’s sporadic and unsystematic usage and application of “elective affinity” in “Economy and Society” as well as his studies on sociology of religion and domination. The article is seeking to demonstrate that the concept of elective affinity enabled Weber to appreciate the autonomous nature of societal spheres and develophis theorizing against the backdrop of modern sociology. Contrary to the assumptions of historical materialism, Weber held that economic determination of social action isambiguous since the forms of social action follow “laws of their own”. Thus, according to Weber, the social scientist can generalize about the degree of elective affinity between concrete structures of social action and concrete forms of economic organization. In other words, the scholar can only state whether the phenomena in question are “adequate” or “inadequate” in relation to one another. |
| format |
Article |
| author |
Кутуев, П. |
| spellingShingle |
Кутуев, П. Избирательное сродство в социологии Макса Вебера Социология: теория, методы, маркетинг |
| author_facet |
Кутуев, П. |
| author_sort |
Кутуев, П. |
| title |
Избирательное сродство в социологии Макса Вебера |
| title_short |
Избирательное сродство в социологии Макса Вебера |
| title_full |
Избирательное сродство в социологии Макса Вебера |
| title_fullStr |
Избирательное сродство в социологии Макса Вебера |
| title_full_unstemmed |
Избирательное сродство в социологии Макса Вебера |
| title_sort |
избирательное сродство в социологии макса вебера |
| publisher |
Iнститут соціології НАН України |
| publishDate |
1999 |
| url |
http://dspace.nbuv.gov.ua/handle/123456789/89501 |
| citation_txt |
Избирательное сродство в социологии Макса Вебера / П. Кутуев // Социология: теория, методы, маркетинг. — 1999. — № 3. — С. 136-148. — Бібліогр.: 23 назв. — рос. |
| series |
Социология: теория, методы, маркетинг |
| work_keys_str_mv |
AT kutuevp izbiratelʹnoesrodstvovsociologiimaksavebera |
| first_indexed |
2023-10-18T19:39:52Z |
| last_indexed |
2023-10-18T19:39:52Z |
| _version_ |
1796147574557638656 |