Пролегомены к политической социологии ленинизма
Drawing heavily upon Weber’s value-free political sociology and Ken Jowitt’s vision of Leninism, the paper suggests that Leninist regimes are best conceptualized as a unique blend of charismatic, impersonal and traditional elements. Being a political and ideological response to conditions of nati...
Збережено в:
| Дата: | 2000 |
|---|---|
| Автор: | |
| Формат: | Стаття |
| Мова: | Russian |
| Опубліковано: |
Iнститут соціології НАН України
2000
|
| Назва видання: | Социология: теория, методы, маркетинг |
| Онлайн доступ: | http://dspace.nbuv.gov.ua/handle/123456789/89856 |
| Теги: |
Додати тег
Немає тегів, Будьте першим, хто поставить тег для цього запису!
|
| Назва журналу: | Digital Library of Periodicals of National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine |
| Цитувати: | Пролегомены к политической социологии ленинизма / П. Кутуев // Социология: теория, методы, маркетинг. — 2000. — № 4. — С. 32–68. — Бібліогр.: 84 назв. — рос. |
Репозитарії
Digital Library of Periodicals of National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine| id |
irk-123456789-89856 |
|---|---|
| record_format |
dspace |
| spelling |
irk-123456789-898562015-12-21T03:02:54Z Пролегомены к политической социологии ленинизма Кутуев, П. Drawing heavily upon Weber’s value-free political sociology and Ken Jowitt’s vision of Leninism, the paper suggests that Leninist regimes are best conceptualized as a unique blend of charismatic, impersonal and traditional elements. Being a political and ideological response to conditions of national dependency in peripheral societies of traditional bent, Leninism created new political entity — the party as organizational weapon — which was a bearer of impersonal charisma. Application of analitical tool box elaborated by Weber and Jowitt increases our understanding of the internal developmental logic of Leninist regimes while helping to draw a distinction between revolutionary system-building politics of Leninist type and nationalist modernizing regimes of the Third World on the one hand and fascist regimes on the other. The article offers an account of developmental stages of Leninist regimes— trans - formation, consolidation, and inclusion. The latter stage purpose was to accommodate new, more complex social and cultural environment to regime’s demands. Having lost its combat task during inclusion stage, the party entered the period of neotraditionalist routinization of its organizational charisma which resulted in a clash between Leninist status oriented cadres and emergent civic oriented styles of life. Regime’s inability to resolve the tension between the two mutually exclusive elements — party cadre and citizen — resulted in “Leninist extinction” and disappearance of Leninism as an alternative life style. 2000 Article Пролегомены к политической социологии ленинизма / П. Кутуев // Социология: теория, методы, маркетинг. — 2000. — № 4. — С. 32–68. — Бібліогр.: 84 назв. — рос. 1563-4426 http://dspace.nbuv.gov.ua/handle/123456789/89856 ru Социология: теория, методы, маркетинг Iнститут соціології НАН України |
| institution |
Digital Library of Periodicals of National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine |
| collection |
DSpace DC |
| language |
Russian |
| description |
Drawing heavily upon Weber’s value-free political sociology and Ken Jowitt’s vision
of Leninism, the paper suggests that Leninist regimes are best conceptualized as a
unique blend of charismatic, impersonal and traditional elements. Being a political
and ideological response to conditions of national dependency in peripheral societies
of traditional bent, Leninism created new political entity — the party as organizational
weapon — which was a bearer of impersonal charisma. Application of analitical tool
box elaborated by Weber and Jowitt increases our understanding of the internal
developmental logic of Leninist regimes while helping to draw a distinction between
revolutionary system-building politics of Leninist type and nationalist modernizing
regimes of the Third World on the one hand and fascist regimes on the other.
The article offers an account of developmental stages of Leninist regimes— trans -
formation, consolidation, and inclusion. The latter stage purpose was to accommodate
new, more complex social and cultural environment to regime’s demands. Having lost
its combat task during inclusion stage, the party entered the period of neotraditionalist
routinization of its organizational charisma which resulted in a clash between Leninist
status oriented cadres and emergent civic oriented styles of life. Regime’s inability to
resolve the tension between the two mutually exclusive elements — party cadre and
citizen — resulted in “Leninist extinction” and disappearance of Leninism as an
alternative life style. |
| format |
Article |
| author |
Кутуев, П. |
| spellingShingle |
Кутуев, П. Пролегомены к политической социологии ленинизма Социология: теория, методы, маркетинг |
| author_facet |
Кутуев, П. |
| author_sort |
Кутуев, П. |
| title |
Пролегомены к политической социологии ленинизма |
| title_short |
Пролегомены к политической социологии ленинизма |
| title_full |
Пролегомены к политической социологии ленинизма |
| title_fullStr |
Пролегомены к политической социологии ленинизма |
| title_full_unstemmed |
Пролегомены к политической социологии ленинизма |
| title_sort |
пролегомены к политической социологии ленинизма |
| publisher |
Iнститут соціології НАН України |
| publishDate |
2000 |
| url |
http://dspace.nbuv.gov.ua/handle/123456789/89856 |
| citation_txt |
Пролегомены к политической социологии ленинизма / П. Кутуев // Социология: теория, методы, маркетинг. — 2000. — № 4. — С. 32–68. — Бібліогр.: 84 назв. — рос. |
| series |
Социология: теория, методы, маркетинг |
| work_keys_str_mv |
AT kutuevp prolegomenykpolitičeskojsociologiileninizma |
| first_indexed |
2023-10-18T19:40:41Z |
| last_indexed |
2023-10-18T19:40:41Z |
| _version_ |
1796147613962076160 |