2025-02-23T21:22:17-05:00 DEBUG: VuFindSearch\Backend\Solr\Connector: Query fl=%2A&wt=json&json.nl=arrarr&q=id%3A%22irk-123456789-89856%22&qt=morelikethis&rows=5
2025-02-23T21:22:17-05:00 DEBUG: VuFindSearch\Backend\Solr\Connector: => GET http://localhost:8983/solr/biblio/select?fl=%2A&wt=json&json.nl=arrarr&q=id%3A%22irk-123456789-89856%22&qt=morelikethis&rows=5
2025-02-23T21:22:17-05:00 DEBUG: VuFindSearch\Backend\Solr\Connector: <= 200 OK
2025-02-23T21:22:17-05:00 DEBUG: Deserialized SOLR response

Пролегомены к политической социологии ленинизма

Drawing heavily upon Weber’s value-free political sociology and Ken Jowitt’s vision of Leninism, the paper suggests that Leninist regimes are best conceptualized as a unique blend of charismatic, impersonal and traditional elements. Being a political and ideological response to conditions of nati...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Кутуев, П.
Format: Article
Language:Russian
Published: Iнститут соціології НАН України 2000
Series:Социология: теория, методы, маркетинг
Online Access:http://dspace.nbuv.gov.ua/handle/123456789/89856
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id irk-123456789-89856
record_format dspace
spelling irk-123456789-898562015-12-21T03:02:54Z Пролегомены к политической социологии ленинизма Кутуев, П. Drawing heavily upon Weber’s value-free political sociology and Ken Jowitt’s vision of Leninism, the paper suggests that Leninist regimes are best conceptualized as a unique blend of charismatic, impersonal and traditional elements. Being a political and ideological response to conditions of national dependency in peripheral societies of traditional bent, Leninism created new political entity — the party as organizational weapon — which was a bearer of impersonal charisma. Application of analitical tool box elaborated by Weber and Jowitt increases our understanding of the internal developmental logic of Leninist regimes while helping to draw a distinction between revolutionary system-building politics of Leninist type and nationalist modernizing regimes of the Third World on the one hand and fascist regimes on the other. The article offers an account of developmental stages of Leninist regimes— trans - formation, consolidation, and inclusion. The latter stage purpose was to accommodate new, more complex social and cultural environment to regime’s demands. Having lost its combat task during inclusion stage, the party entered the period of neotraditionalist routinization of its organizational charisma which resulted in a clash between Leninist status oriented cadres and emergent civic oriented styles of life. Regime’s inability to resolve the tension between the two mutually exclusive elements — party cadre and citizen — resulted in “Leninist extinction” and disappearance of Leninism as an alternative life style. 2000 Article Пролегомены к политической социологии ленинизма / П. Кутуев // Социология: теория, методы, маркетинг. — 2000. — № 4. — С. 32–68. — Бібліогр.: 84 назв. — рос. 1563-4426 http://dspace.nbuv.gov.ua/handle/123456789/89856 ru Социология: теория, методы, маркетинг Iнститут соціології НАН України
institution Digital Library of Periodicals of National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine
collection DSpace DC
language Russian
description Drawing heavily upon Weber’s value-free political sociology and Ken Jowitt’s vision of Leninism, the paper suggests that Leninist regimes are best conceptualized as a unique blend of charismatic, impersonal and traditional elements. Being a political and ideological response to conditions of national dependency in peripheral societies of traditional bent, Leninism created new political entity — the party as organizational weapon — which was a bearer of impersonal charisma. Application of analitical tool box elaborated by Weber and Jowitt increases our understanding of the internal developmental logic of Leninist regimes while helping to draw a distinction between revolutionary system-building politics of Leninist type and nationalist modernizing regimes of the Third World on the one hand and fascist regimes on the other. The article offers an account of developmental stages of Leninist regimes— trans - formation, consolidation, and inclusion. The latter stage purpose was to accommodate new, more complex social and cultural environment to regime’s demands. Having lost its combat task during inclusion stage, the party entered the period of neotraditionalist routinization of its organizational charisma which resulted in a clash between Leninist status oriented cadres and emergent civic oriented styles of life. Regime’s inability to resolve the tension between the two mutually exclusive elements — party cadre and citizen — resulted in “Leninist extinction” and disappearance of Leninism as an alternative life style.
format Article
author Кутуев, П.
spellingShingle Кутуев, П.
Пролегомены к политической социологии ленинизма
Социология: теория, методы, маркетинг
author_facet Кутуев, П.
author_sort Кутуев, П.
title Пролегомены к политической социологии ленинизма
title_short Пролегомены к политической социологии ленинизма
title_full Пролегомены к политической социологии ленинизма
title_fullStr Пролегомены к политической социологии ленинизма
title_full_unstemmed Пролегомены к политической социологии ленинизма
title_sort пролегомены к политической социологии ленинизма
publisher Iнститут соціології НАН України
publishDate 2000
url http://dspace.nbuv.gov.ua/handle/123456789/89856
citation_txt Пролегомены к политической социологии ленинизма / П. Кутуев // Социология: теория, методы, маркетинг. — 2000. — № 4. — С. 32–68. — Бібліогр.: 84 назв. — рос.
series Социология: теория, методы, маркетинг
work_keys_str_mv AT kutuevp prolegomenykpolitičeskojsociologiileninizma
first_indexed 2023-10-18T19:40:41Z
last_indexed 2023-10-18T19:40:41Z
_version_ 1796147613962076160