Государственное ресурсоизвлечение и демократия
The author's complex argument is built on two components. First, whether rulers acquire their means of rule by producing those means, buying them with monopolized goods, or extracting them from subject populations deeply affects the character of rule. Second, over the long run democratization o...
Збережено в:
| Дата: | 2007 |
|---|---|
| Автор: | |
| Формат: | Стаття |
| Мова: | Russian |
| Опубліковано: |
Iнститут соціології НАН України
2007
|
| Назва видання: | Социология: теория, методы, маркетинг |
| Онлайн доступ: | http://dspace.nbuv.gov.ua/handle/123456789/90360 |
| Теги: |
Додати тег
Немає тегів, Будьте першим, хто поставить тег для цього запису!
|
| Назва журналу: | Digital Library of Periodicals of National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine |
| Цитувати: | Государственное ресурсоизвлечение и демократия / Ч. Тилли // Социология: теория, методы, маркетинг. — 2007. — № 4. — С. 38-49. — Бібліогр.: 17 назв. — рос. |
Репозитарії
Digital Library of Periodicals of National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine| Резюме: | The author's complex argument is built on two components. First, whether rulers acquire their means of rule by producing those means, buying them with monopolized goods, or extracting them from subject populations deeply affects the character of rule. Second, over the long run democratization only occurs when rulers come to rely on citizen compliance for their means of rule. The first component implies that students of fiscality could effectively strong then their theories by considering the whole range of state-sustaining resources before closing in on taxation as a special way of acquiring those resources. The second component implies that students of fiscality are following the spoor of democratization and, for that matter, de-democratization. Thus, we can track down the causes of fundamental changes and variations in political regimes. |
|---|