Моделі для розвитку інформаційно-керувального коплексу підприємства
This article provides a brief analysis of the development of concepts and terms used in the automation the processes of production and enterprise management. The conclusion is made about the preference of the term “information-control complex” (ICC) of the enterprise and the expediency of using vari...
Збережено в:
| Дата: | 2021 |
|---|---|
| Автори: | , , |
| Формат: | Стаття |
| Мова: | Англійська |
| Опубліковано: |
The National Technical University of Ukraine "Igor Sikorsky Kyiv Polytechnic Institute"
2021
|
| Теми: | |
| Онлайн доступ: | https://journal.iasa.kpi.ua/article/view/236924 |
| Теги: |
Додати тег
Немає тегів, Будьте першим, хто поставить тег для цього запису!
|
| Назва журналу: | System research and information technologies |
| Завантажити файл: |  |
Репозитарії
System research and information technologies| _version_ | 1866302741729509376 |
|---|---|
| author | Volkova, Violetta Leonova, Alla Loginova, Alexandra |
| author_facet | Volkova, Violetta Leonova, Alla Loginova, Alexandra |
| author_sort | Volkova, Violetta |
| baseUrl_str | http://journal.iasa.kpi.ua/oai |
| collection | OJS |
| datestamp_date | 2021-07-13T11:01:37Z |
| description | This article provides a brief analysis of the development of concepts and terms used in the automation the processes of production and enterprise management. The conclusion is made about the preference of the term “information-control complex” (ICC) of the enterprise and the expediency of using various concepts in its creation. A model for the development of ICC is proposed, based on the definition of a system that implements the system-target approach, and the “engineering” concept. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.20535/SRIT.2308-8893.2021.1.10 |
| first_indexed | 2025-07-17T10:27:17Z |
| format | Article |
| fulltext |
V.N. Volkova, A.E. Leonova, A.V. Loginova, 2021
Системні дослідження та інформаційні технології, 2021, № 1 121
UDC 303.732.4
DOI: 10.20535/SRIT.2308-8893.2021.1.10
MODELS FOR DEVELOPMENT OF THE INFORMATION-
CONTROL COMPLEX OF THE ENTERPRISE
V.N. VOLKOVA, A.E. LEONOVA, A.V. LOGINOVA
Abstract. This article provides a brief analysis of the development of concepts and
terms used in the automation the processes of production and enterprise manage-
ment. The conclusion is made about the preference of the term “information-control
complex” (ICC) of the enterprise and the expediency of using various concepts in its
creation. A model for the development of ICC is proposed, based on the definition of a
system that implements the system-target approach, and the “engineering” concept.
Keywords: control system, enterprise architecture, engineering, information-
control/management complex.
INTRODUCTION
During the development of automation of information support for enterprise
management, and new technologies emerged, the terminology, types of informa-
tion systems, and standards governing their development and functioning changed. In
the initial period of control automation, the following terms were used: data process-
ing systems (DDS); databases (DB); automated control systems and automated
information systems (ACS and AIS), information-retrieval system (IRS), etc.
In connection with the political and economic transformations of 1990–1991,
mainly, enterprises began to acquire foreign local or domestic information
systems (IS) developed for certain types of activities of organizations (accounting,
personnel, etc.), create separate pages of information on the Internet. But then it is
realized that in order to manage an organization, it is necessary to combine
automated information systems developed for individual functions and types of
activity into a single enterprise management automation system. The concept of
enterprise architecture emerged. With the intensification of the development and
implementation of innovations, interest in the initial understanding of the term
engineering is revived.
The variety of the notions complicates the organization of work on the
automation of enterprise management. Therefore, it is advisable to conduct
a comparative analysis of the usefulness of these terms for specific organizations,
taking into account their emergence and modern interpretation, and to develop
methodological foundations and models for the further development of
automation of production processes and organizational management of the
enterprise.
OVERVIEW OF APPROACHES TO CREATION OF AUTOMATION SYSTEMS
FOR ENTERPRISE CONTROL
In the 1960, when automation began to be used to manage enterprises in the So-
viet Union, the methodology for developing automated control systems was ini-
V.N. Volkova, A.E. Leonova, A.V. Loginova
ISSN 1681–6048 System Research & Information Technologies, 2021, № 1 122
tially based on the fundamental principles of the control developed in the theory
of automatic control. In particular, the principle control on based deviations or
principle feedback
)),().(()( exit tztuFty
where kRty exit)( ; kR — vector of output signals; pRtz )( ; pR — distur-
bance vector; kpm RRRF — transformation that determines the type of
relationship between exity , u and z ; k — number of output actions; m — num-
ber of control actions; p — number of disturbing impact )(tz ; mRtu )( — con-
trol action calculated by the formula:
]|),)((|[)( reqyOtxFGtu p ,
where mRtx )( — predetermined control (the law of the system functioning);
pRtz )( ; pR — disturbance vector; reqy — desired result (setpoint);
mk RRG : , mk OOG )( — feedback block conversion; pk OO , pm OO ;
m — number of control actions; p — number of disturbing impact )(tz .
In the mid-1960s, the American Society for Production and Inventory Manage-
ment (APICS) formulated a number of principles according for proposed to build
models of the main production processes that were applied to solve the problems
of managing the inventory of an enterprise and were called the concept of MRP
(Material Requirements Planning). Later, as this approach was applied to other
production processes, the concepts of MRPII, ERP, etc. appeared. On this basis,
software products were created, which became quite widespread.
This approach, hereinafter called the process approach, is aimed at solving
practical problems associated with the activities of enterprises, and can be suc-
cessfully applied to relatively small firms. However, for scientific and production
associations, large enterprises of mass production, such an approach, which was
originally called functional and technological, is very difficult to implement.
Therefore, during the period began to create automated information systems
(AIS) as the first stage of automated control systems in the Soviet Union, a sys-
tem-targeted approach was adopted. A classification of automated systems was
developed, focused on different levels of enterprise management, including their
structural divisions, industries and the state as a whole. The developed branch
ACS (OACS), regional or territorial ACS (RASU, TASU) and enterprise ACS
were supposed to be combined into the National Automated System (OGAS) for
collecting, storing and searching information.
To manage the development of automated systems, the corresponding
guiding methodological materials were prepared, in which the concepts of the
functional part (FP), formed on the basis of the analysis of the goals and functions
of the enterprise, and the supporting part (SP), including information, technical,
program and other types of ACS support. The structure of the FP was initially
developed in the form of a tree-like hierarchy, then, as the number of subsystems
increased, in the form of matrix, multi-level and structures.
In the 1990s, when the information market of software products began to
actively develop, subject-oriented and corporate information systems (SOIS, CIS)
were developing on the basis of new information technologies. The most developed
Models for development of the information-control complex of the enterprise
Системні дослідження та інформаційні технології, 2021, № 1 123
automated information systems that support the internal activities of mass produc-
tion enterprises include:
IIS < ERP MRPII, MRP, MES, PDM >,
where MES — manufacturing execution system; MRP and MRPII — Material
Requirements Planning; ERP — Enterprise Resources Planning; PDM — Product
Data Managerment.
In 1987, the concept of “enterprise architecture” emerged, which was first
presented in an article by J.A. Zachman [1] in the form of a two-dimensional ma-
trix, in columns — “the main aspects of the activity (“what”, “how”, “where”,
“who”, “when”, “why”); and line by line — different descriptions of the system
from the point of view of business leaders, managers and developers. In 1996–1997
E.Z. Zinder proposed a “3D model” of the enterprise [2, 3]. The model introduces
a axis of time, where the intervals for the implementation of various projects and
stages of development of the IS and the entire enterprise are located, and the prin-
ciples of the Zachman matrix are used as other axes. This model became the basis
for multidimensional structures. Then it was created multidimensional mofels,
used in the systems of the Department of Defense and other US Federal govern-
ment agencies [4–9]: TAFIM (Technical Architecture Framework for Information
Management). FEAF (Federal Enterprise Architecture Framework). TOGAF (The
Open Group Architectural Framework), DoDAF (Department of Defense Archi-
tecture Framework), etc. Standards ISO 14258: 1998 (as amended from 2000) and
ISO 15704: 2000 have been developed.
In the 1990s to combine heterogeneous software products into a single au-
tomated information system of an enterprise, the idea of an information infra-
structure was proposed [11], on the basis of a modification of which, in the next
section, the concept of an information management complex is substantiated and
models for its implementation are proposed.
THE CONCEPT OF A MULTI-LEVEL INFORMATION-CONTROL COMPLEX
The concept and model (Fig. 1) of a multilevel information management complex
(IAC) is based on the use of a system definition that implements the system-target
approach [12]
defS <Z, STR, TECH, COND, N >, (1)
where Z — goals that can be interpreted as the structure of the functional part of
the ACS, as the needs of users;
STR — he structure of the relationship between Z and information arrays,
i.e. databases; searcher arrays of documents, repositories information of various
kinds;
TECH — technologies in a broad sense, including technical means (i.e. de-
vices or devices that are necessary for collecting, registering, storing, processing
and presenting information), methods of collecting, storing, processing informa-
tion, including algorithms, software procedures or packages of application pro-
grams, information technologies, etc.;
COND — conditions, i.e. external and internal factors influencing the crea-
tion and functioning of ICC; for their analysis, it is useful to use the attribute
V.N. Volkova, A.E. Leonova, A.V. Loginova
ISSN 1681–6048 System Research & Information Technologies, 2021, № 1 124
“space of target initiation”, i.e. to identify the factors of the supersystem and the
actual environment )( ext , sub-departmental and the system itself )( int ;
N — people interacting with the system, i.e. those who order, design, use this
IСС. For a general name for everyone involved in the development and use of sys-
tems, W.R. Ashby, at the beginning of the development of cybernetics and systems
theory, introduced the term “observer”; and nowadays, the term “stakeholders” is of-
ten used [13].
The definition (1) and illustrating its stratified representation (Fig. 1) help to
theoretically substantiate the structure of the information-control complex, to
manage its development. The definition can be interpreted taking into account the
purpose and conditions of its development. It is necessary to determine the
relationship between the components of the user, functional and information strat-
levels, to justify the choice of the necessary technologies.
The stratified representation helps to solve the problems of managing pro-
jects and programs for the development of ICC, allocation of financial, material
and human resources based on the development and application of appropriate
methods and automated procedures to determine the composition of the com-
ponents of each strata, assess the impact of a project in the field of ICC on its de-
velopment.
In particular, for the analysis and formation of a functional strat, it is advis-
able to use the methods of structuring goals and functions, methods of analyzing
Z
S
STR
TECH
Strata 2. Functional.
Structures of functional capabilities of information systems
for various purposes (for example, structures of the FCh of the
ASC, etc.).
Strata 4. Technology
Information telecommunications, computer networks, etc.
technical means. Information protection means.
Strata 3. Information resources (databases)
Informational resources
Information is contained in information storages: libraries,
departments of scientific and technical information, automated
documentary-factual databases, telecommunication networks, etc.
Strata 1. Users.
Types of users and their needs
П …
N
Fig. 1. Model of a multi-level information-control complex
Models for development of the information-control complex of the enterprise
Системні дослідження та інформаційні технології, 2021, № 1 125
information needs, developed in the theory of information retrieval. The assess-
ment of the significance of the elements of each of the strata can be carried out
using the methods of organizing complicated examinations: the method of paired
comparisons in the modification of T. Saati [13], the method of deciding matrices
by G.S. Pospelov [14], the informational approach of A.A. Denisov [15] and
others [16, 17], take into account different criteria technical, economic, social.
For example, you can apply the model of deciding matrices:
“Functional strata j ” “Information resourcces i ” “Tech-
nology 1 ”.
Then the algorithm for analyzing the model:
Evaluation j Checkness
j
j 1 Evaluation ij for each j
Checkness
i
ija 1 for each j Calculation
j
jiji a
i
i 1
Evaluation kib Checkness
k
kib 1 for each ib Calculation
i
ikik b
k
k 1.
The considered concept and models make it possible to manage the devel-
opment of IAI. At the same time, both the concept of enterprise architecture and
the concept of a multi-level ICC help to reflect the structure of the ICC, make de-
cisions about its development, but do not take into account the processes of the
enterprise, including its interaction with the environment, receipt, execution and
implementation of orders. Therefore, it is proposed to additionally use concept of
the engineering in the development of ICC.
ROLE THE CONCEPT OF ENGINEERING FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF THE
INFORMATION- CONTROL COMPLEX
For the development of ICC, it is important to use the concept of “engineering” in
the original meaning of this term in the 16th century (from Lat. Ingenium in-
genuity, invention, knowledge). In the XVII century engineering began to form
into a separate profession. Scale drawings help to maintain the integrity of the
product presentation and to see the role and place of parts in the product. De-
velopment leads to the combination of engineering with scientific progress, with
technological innovation.
Engineering in the original understanding is a superstructure over design and
development activities, allowing the results of engineering activities to be brought
closer to their direct implementation, to obtain a new, synergistic, result, the
emergence. Engineering includes all stages of the life cycle of product creation,
order fulfillment — from concept to implementation and maintenance, including
delivery, installation supervision, condition acceptance and field supervision, if
necessary.
Engineering activities (although in the Soviet Union the foreign term “engi-
neering” was not used) was provided by the service of the chief engineer, which
coordinated not only the departments of the chief designer, chief technologist,
V.N. Volkova, A.E. Leonova, A.V. Loginova
ISSN 1681–6048 System Research & Information Technologies, 2021, № 1 126
chief mechanic, etc. activities, but also subdivisions such as a bureau of inven-
tions and discoveries, helping in the organization of rationalization and inventive
activities, and subsequently – special design bureaus, or even research institutes,
which supplemented the support of the full life cycle of engineering activities —
from inventions to innovative products (new types of products or their blocks),
innovative technologies that ensure the development of enterprises.
When accompanying the creation of complex products, the path from con-
cept to implementation and support is not a unidirectional, but a complex graph,
including the order or purchase of components through tenders, the distribution of
work, taking into account the specialization and cooperation of not only divisions,
but even enterprises. Each stage of the complete life cycle is a complex process.
In particular, design and technological activities are supported by a multilevel
system of drawings of various types (general block diagrams, schematic dia-
grams, product projections, etc.) and normative and technical documentation. To
implement these works, knowledge of technical disciplines (mechanics, reliability
theory, systems engineering), management disciplines (project management,
quality management, etc.), economic and legal disciplines is required. This served
as the basis for the implementation of engineering in the form of consulting ac-
tivities in individual areas required to complete the stages and sub-stages of the
project. This practice arose in the 18th century, when engineering became a pro-
fessional activity and a separate discipline.
Professional associations and schools of engineering have emerged.
Standards have been created [18, 19], in which engineering is interpreted as
technical consulting services related to the development and preparation of the
production process and the provision of the production process and the sale of
products. This form of engineering is widely used in modern practice. There are
specialized engineering centers, mainly engaged in automated support of the
stages of the life cycle of development and implementation of innovations,
professional communities and associations that unite engineers from different
countries. There are different points of view both on the content of engineering
activities and on the concept of “engineering”. The content of the concept of
“engineering” is constantly expanding, including areas that are more and more
distant from the classical engineering activity. Therefore, it is proposed to
investigate the essence of this concept using the theory of an open system with
active elements.
On the basis of his research, the Belgian biologist L. von Bertalanffy discovered
that in open systems, as opposed to closed (isolated from the environment), ther-
modynamic laws appear that contradict the second law of thermodynamics. In
accordance with the concept of L. von Bertalanffy “... it is quite possible to intro-
duce negentropy”, that is, to decrease the entropy; and “... such systems can main-
tain their high level and even develop in the direction of increasing the order of
complexity” [20].
L. von Bertalanffy explained negentropic tendencies mainly by the openness
of the system. Further studies of development processes made it possible to un-
derstand that development occurs not only due to the openness of the system, but
also due to the active elements that initiate innovation. The studies of the Russia
scientist E. Bauer allowed a deeper understanding of the development processes.
E. Bauer investigated one of the fundamentally important for understanding the
development of living systems regularities of the fundamental disequilibrium of
living systems, that is, the desire to maintain a stable imbalance and use energy to
Models for development of the information-control complex of the enterprise
Системні дослідження та інформаційні технології, 2021, № 1 127
maintain oneself in a disequilibrium state. E. Bauer explains this by the fact that
all structures of living cells at the molecular level are pre-charged with “excess”
excess energy in comparison with a non-living molecule, and the body receives
external energy not for work, but to maintain itself in a nonequilibrium state [21].
On the basis of understanding the ideas of E. Bauer (eg, [22]), it can be concluded
that, in fact, we are talking about the biopotential of a “living cell”, which is de-
termined not only by physiological energy as a source of negentropy. At a certain
level of development of a living thing, such a source of negentropic processes can
be interpreted as a potential based on information and knowledge. Then we can
conclude that, taking into account the research of E. Bauer, for the development
of any organization (enterprise, territorial association, etc.), it should have a kind
of “living cell” that accumulates energy/information in order to to create innova-
tions that drive the development of the organization.
Such an interpretation of the source of negentropic processes can be associated
with the concept of “engineering” in the original sense of this term (from the Latin
Ingenium — ingenuity, knowledge), that is, in accordance with the definition given
in the Oxford Dictionary, in which engineering is interpreted as the activity of
applying scientific knowledge for the design, construction, control production of
machines and plants, etc. Based on this, it can be concluded that for the devel-
opment of an organization, engineering tasks should be solved by teams of
qualified professionals specializing in the relevant types of professional activity.
To manage this activity, the coordination of the relevant sub-divisions or
organizations performing this work is necessary. Such coordination requires the
creation of a system of information support at all stages of the life cycle of the
activity, for which the concept of engineering is applied, that is, it is necessary to
create a unified information-control complex, including software for engineering
and design activities, accompanying regulatory methodological, regulatory-
technical, organizational and administrative documentation. Therefore, it is not
enough for organizations to use the advisory services of specialized organizations,
but it is necessary to develop and apply the form of engineering in the original
sense of the notion.
This form represents design-technological and regulatory-technical support
for the entire life cycle from the invention of an innovation or receipt of an
order, the development of the structure of its research, design, technological,
production implementation and delivery to the customer. To provide such
support, it is necessary to create an automated information-control complex of an
enterprise that implements the engineering concept. This information complex
provides the necessary coordination of all stages of the life cycle of the innovation
process, for which the idea of engineering is used.
Taking this into account, when creating an ICC, it is necessary to have
subdivisions that, in accordance with E. Bauer’s concept, accumulate
energy/information in order to invent innovations that ensure the development of
the organization. To aid in decision-making, it should be possible to include in
such an ICC models that help in making decisions on the analysis and selection of
innovations (eg [23–31]). It is also necessary to create an environment that would
ensure interconnection in the information space and access to information of
persons using it at the appropriate stages of the life cycle. The basis of such an
environment can be an intelligent knowledge representation system of the type
proposed in [32]. The development of such a system and the coordination of
engineering work at the enterprise should be part of the functions of the unit dealing
with the organization of the strategic development of the enterprise (organization).
V.N. Volkova, A.E. Leonova, A.V. Loginova
ISSN 1681–6048 System Research & Information Technologies, 2021, № 1 128
CONCLUSION
Analysis of the concepts and notions used in the creation of automated informa-
tion support for production processes and enterprise management allows us to
draw some conclusions.
The notion ASC, which determined the ultimate desired goals of automating
the management of enterprises and organizations, outstripped the capabilities of
technologies that existed to create such systems at that time. Experience in the
creation and application of software products for individual arms of activity (also
called automated systems — accounting, personnel, etc.), solve the problem of
ensuring the business processes of small and medium-sized companies. However,
for large enterprises and organizations, other forms of integrated information
support are needed.
The concept of enterprise architecture has made it possible to create
multidimensional information bases. However, despite the fact that, in accordance
with the concept of the Gartner Group, architecture is considered not only as a
static model of a complex system, but also as a process, a set of guidelines and
rules that determine the construction of new subsystems, this concept still does
not focus on information support processes of creation and implementation of
innovations, that is, to display the dynamics of the functioning of the system.
Perhaps that is why recently there has been a revival of interest in the concept
of engineering, including among the author of the architectural concept of a 3D-
enterprise [33].
The use of the definition of a systembased on the system-target approach
made it possible to substantiate the concept of a multi-level information and
control complex, linking goals, sources of information and technical means to
ensure enterprise management. The use of the concept of an open system by L.
von Bert-lanffy and the study of the features of this system in the works of E.
Bauer made it possible to substantiate the role of engineering as an innovative
technology for the development system of information support for control and
managing the development of enterprises, territorial and other organizations.
Therefore, the idea of creating an ICC, implementing the concept of
engineering, automating the collection of information at all stages of the life cycle
of production and organizational management of enterprise, and the creation on
this based the unified information-control environment, the basis of which can be
an intelligent knowledge representation system of the type proposed, for example,
in [32], seems perspective. The implementation of the ICC allows you to combine
different concepts and manage the development of information support for the
enterprise.
REFERENCES
1. J.A. Zachman, “The structure of information systems architecture”, IBM Systems
Journal, vol. 26, no. 3, 1987.
2. E.Z. Zinder, “New system design: information technology and system design”,
DBMS, no. 4, 1, 1995.
3. E.Z. Zinder, “3D-enterprise a model of a transforming system”, Director of In-
formation Service, no. 4.
4. A. Danilin and A. Slyusarenko, Architecture and Strategy. “Yin” and “Yang” of in-
formation technologies. M.: Internet University of Information Technologies, 2005.
Available: INTUIT.ru//razym.ru›komp/59613-danilin-a-slyusarenko-a
Models for development of the information-control complex of the enterprise
Системні дослідження та інформаційні технології, 2021, № 1 129
5. R. Sessions, Comparison of the four leading architecture building methodologies,
2007. Available: http://msdn.microsoft.com/ru-ru/library/ee914379.aspx
6. S. Kotusev, “TOGAF: Just the Next Fad That Turned into a New Religion”, TOGAF
Is Not an EA Framework: The Inconvenient Pragmatic Truth, K.L. Smith (ed.),
Great Notley, UK: Pragmatic EA Ltd., 2018, pp. 27–40.
7. Cole Perks and Tony Beveridge, Enterprise IT Architecture Guide. New York, NY:
Springer, 2003.
8. Scott R. Bittler and Greg Kreutzman, Gartner Enterprise Architecture Process: De-
velopment, 2005.
9. N. Dedic, “FEAMI: A Methodology to include and to integrate Enterprise Architec-
ture Processes into Existing Organizational Processes”, IEEE Engineering Manage-
ment Review. doi: 10.1109/EMR.2020.3031968.
10. W.J. Clinton and A. Gore, “Technology for America`s Economic Growth, a New
Direction to Build”, Executive Office of the President. Washington, DC, 1993, 39 pp.
11. V.N. Volkova, “Razvitiye opredeleniya sistemy [System definition development]”,
Mater. Mezhdunarodnoy nauchno-prakticheskoy konferentsii «Sistemnyy analiz
proyektirovaniya i upravleniya»: sb. SPb.: Izd-vo SPbGPU, 2001, pp. 12–14.
12. R.L. Ackoff, Re-Creating the Corporation: A Design of Organization for the 21st
Century. New York, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1999.
13. Thomas L. Saaty and Kevin P. Kearns, Analytical Planning: The Organization of
Systems, 1985.
14. G.S. Pospelov and V.A. Irikov, Programmno-tselevoye planirovaniye i upravleniye
[Target planning and management]. M.: Sov. radio, 1976, 440 p.
15. A.A. Denisov, Sovremennyye problemy sistemnogo analiza [Modern problems of
systems analysis]. SPb.: Izd-vo Politekhn. un-ta, 2008, 304 p.
16. V.N. Volkova and V.N. Kozlov (eds.), Modelirovaniye sistem i protsessov [Model-
ing systems and processes]. M.: Yurayt Publ., 2015, 449 p.
17. N.D. Pankratova, Sistemniy analíz. Teoríya ta zastosuvannya [System analysis. The-
ory and application]. Kiív: Naukova dumka, 2018, 347 p.
18. GOST R 57306-2016. Engineering. Terminology and basic concepts in the field of
engineering. Available: docs.cntd.ru›document/437092138.
19. ISO/IEC 15288: (IEEE Std 152882008). Systems and Software Engineering —
System Life Cycle Processes. International Organization for Standardization.
20. L. von Bertalanfy, “System Theory a Critical Review”, General System, vol. 7,
pp. 1–20, 1962.
21. E. Bauer, Teoreticheskaya biologiya [Theoretical biology]. M.L.: VIEM Padl., 1935, 206 p.
22. A.L. Shamis, Modeli povedeniya, vospriyatiya i myshleniya [Models of behavior,
perception and thinking]. M.: Intuit, 2010, 230 p.
23. V.N. Volkova, V.I. Karpov, A.E. Leonova, A.V. Loginova, and E.V.L. Romanova,
“Concept of engineering as a basis for development cyber-physical system”, CEUR
Workshop Proceedings, 2019.
24. V.N. Volkova, Yu.A. Golub, and A.V. Loginova, “Multilevel Model for Manage-
ment the Regional System of Training in Conditions of Introducing Digital Tech-
nologies”, Proceedings of 2018 17th Russian Scientific and Practical Conference on
Planning and Teaching Engineering Staff for the Industrial and Economic Complex
of the Region, PTES 2018, pp, 181–184, 8604276.
25. V.N. Volkova, A.S. Kudryavtseva, A.V. Loginova, Y.Y. Chernyy, and A.E. Leo-
nova, “System Analysis of Innovative Technologies of the Industrial Revolutions”,
Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference Ergo-2018: Human Factors in
Complex Technical Systems and Environments, Ergo 2018, pp. 57–61.
26. V. Volkova, A. Leonova, A. Loginova, and Y.Chernyy, “System analysis of the de-
velopment of information-communication technologies”, CSIS’2019: XI Interna-
tional Scientific Conference Communicative Strategies of the Information Society,
ACM International Conference Proceeding Series, ACM, New York, 2019, pp. 1–6.
Available: https://doi.org/10.1145/3373722.3373765
V.N. Volkova, A.E. Leonova, A.V. Loginova
ISSN 1681–6048 System Research & Information Technologies, 2021, № 1 130
27. V.N. Volkova, A.E. Leonova, E.V. Romanova, and Y.Y. Chernyy, “Engineering as a
Coordinating Method for the Development of the Organization and Society”, Lecture
Notes in Networks and Systems, 184, pp. 12–21, 2021.
28. V. Volkova, G. Gorelova, and N. Pankratova, “The Development of the Cyberphysi-
cal System Concept on Base of the Interdisciplinary Theories”, IEEE 2nd Interna-
tional Conference on System Analysis and Intelligent Computing, SAIC 2020,
9239213.
29. V.N. Volkova, B.S. Fleishman, F.P. Tarasenko, and A.V. Loginova, “Further
Development of Potential Feasibility Theory for Complicated Systems According to
the Unified General-System Principle”, Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems,
184, pp. 446–453, 2021.
30. N. Pankratova, P. Bidyuk, and I. Golinko, “Decision support system for microcli-
mate control at large industrial enterprises”, CEUR Workshop Proceedings,
pp. 489–498, 2020.
31. N. Pankratova, P. Bidyuk, and I. Golinko, “Synthesis of a multidimensional control
system for a precision complex of artificial microclimate”, System Research & In-
formation Technologies, no. 1, pp. 7–20, 2020. doi: https://doi.org/10.20535/SRIT.
23088893.2020.1.01
32. Ye.S. Kuzin, Predstavleniye znaniy i resheniye informatsionno-slozhnykh zadach v
komp'yuternykh sistemakh [Representation of knowledge and solution of informa-
tion-complex problems in computer systems]. M.: Novyye tekhnologi, 2004, 32 p.
33. E.Z. Zinder, “Values-directed enterprise engineering”, Business Informatics,
no. 3 (45), pp. 7–19, 2018.
Received: 17.03.2020
INFORMATION ON THE ARTICLE
Violetta N. Volkova, ORCID: 0000-0001-9658-5135, Peter the Great St. Petersburg
Polytechnic University, Russia, e-mail: violetta_volkova@list.ru
Alla E. Leonova, ORCID: 0000-0002-2124-0295, Scientific Research Center for Elec-
tronic Computing JSC “NITSEVT”, Russia, e-mail: alla.leonova@nicevt.ru
Alexandra V. Loginova, ORCID: 0000-0002-7783-7795, Peter the Great St. Petersburg
Polytechnic University, Russia, e-mail: alexandra-lo@yandex.ru
МОДЕЛІ ДЛЯ РОЗВИТКУ ІНФОРМАЦІЙНО-КЕРУВАЛЬНОГО КОПЛЕКСУ
ПІДПРИЄМСТВА / В.М. Волкова, А.Є. Леонова, О.В. Логінова
Анотація. Подано стислий аналіз розвитку понять і термінів, що використо-
вуються в автоматизації процесів виробництва та управління підприємством.
Зроблено висновок про перевагу терміна «інформаційно-керувальний ком-
плекс» (ІКК) підприємства та доцільність використання різних концепцій під
час його створення. Запропоновано модель розвитку ІКК, засновану на визначенні
системи, що реалізує системно-цільовий підхід та концепцію «інжиніринг».
Ключові слова: система управління, архітектура підприємств, інжиніринг,
інформаційно-керувальний комплекс.
МОДЕЛИ ДЛЯ РАЗВИТИЯ ИНФОРМАЦИОННО-УПРАВЛЯЮЩЕГО
КОМПЛЕКСА ПРЕДПРИЯТИЯ / В.Н. Волкова, А.Е. Леонова, А.В. Логинова
Аннотация. Приведен краткий анализ развития понятий и терминов, исполь-
зуемых в автоматизации процессов производства и управления предприятием.
Сделан вывод о предпочтительности термина «информационно-управляющий
комплекс» (ИУК) предприятия и целесообразности использования при его со-
здании различных концепций. Предложена модель разработки УИС, основан-
ная на определении системы, реализующей системно-целевой подход, и кон-
цепции «инжиниринг».
Ключевые слова: система управления, архитектура предприятия, инжини-
ринг, информационно-управляющий комплекс.
|
| id | journaliasakpiua-article-236924 |
| institution | System research and information technologies |
| keywords_txt_mv | keywords |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2025-07-17T10:27:17Z |
| publishDate | 2021 |
| publisher | The National Technical University of Ukraine "Igor Sikorsky Kyiv Polytechnic Institute" |
| record_format | ojs |
| resource_txt_mv | journaliasakpiua/3e/f4313ca02dea18503815358d9d540e3e.pdf |
| spelling | journaliasakpiua-article-2369242021-07-13T11:01:37Z Models for development of the information-control complex of the enterprise Модели для развития информационно-управляющего комплекса предприятия Моделі для розвитку інформаційно-керувального коплексу підприємства Volkova, Violetta Leonova, Alla Loginova, Alexandra control system enterprise architecture engineering information-control/management complex система управления архитектура предприятия инжиниринг информационно-управляющий комплекс система управління архітектура підприємств інжиніринг інформаційно-керувальний комплекс This article provides a brief analysis of the development of concepts and terms used in the automation the processes of production and enterprise management. The conclusion is made about the preference of the term “information-control complex” (ICC) of the enterprise and the expediency of using various concepts in its creation. A model for the development of ICC is proposed, based on the definition of a system that implements the system-target approach, and the “engineering” concept. Приведен краткий анализ развития понятий и терминов, используемых в автоматизации процессов производства и управления предприятием. Сделан вывод о предпочтительности термина “информационно-управляющий комплекс” (ИУК) предприятия и целесообразности использования при его создании различных концепций. Предложена модель разработки УИС, основанная на определении системы, реализующей системно-целевой подход, и концепции “инжиниринг”. Подано стислий аналіз розвитку понять і термінів, що використовуються в автоматизації процесів виробництва та управління підприємством. Зроблено висновок про перевагу терміна “інформаційно-керувальний комплекс” (ІКК) підприємства та доцільність використання різних концепцій під час його створення. Запропоновано модель розвитку ІКК, засновану на визначенні системи, що реалізує системно-цільовий підхід та концепцію “інжиніринг”. The National Technical University of Ukraine "Igor Sikorsky Kyiv Polytechnic Institute" 2021-07-13 Article Article application/pdf https://journal.iasa.kpi.ua/article/view/236924 10.20535/SRIT.2308-8893.2021.1.10 System research and information technologies; No. 1 (2021); 121-130 Системные исследования и информационные технологии; № 1 (2021); 121-130 Системні дослідження та інформаційні технології; № 1 (2021); 121-130 2308-8893 1681-6048 en https://journal.iasa.kpi.ua/article/view/236924/235483 |
| spellingShingle | система управління архітектура підприємств інжиніринг інформаційно-керувальний комплекс Volkova, Violetta Leonova, Alla Loginova, Alexandra Моделі для розвитку інформаційно-керувального коплексу підприємства |
| title | Моделі для розвитку інформаційно-керувального коплексу підприємства |
| title_alt | Models for development of the information-control complex of the enterprise Модели для развития информационно-управляющего комплекса предприятия |
| title_full | Моделі для розвитку інформаційно-керувального коплексу підприємства |
| title_fullStr | Моделі для розвитку інформаційно-керувального коплексу підприємства |
| title_full_unstemmed | Моделі для розвитку інформаційно-керувального коплексу підприємства |
| title_short | Моделі для розвитку інформаційно-керувального коплексу підприємства |
| title_sort | моделі для розвитку інформаційно-керувального коплексу підприємства |
| topic | система управління архітектура підприємств інжиніринг інформаційно-керувальний комплекс |
| topic_facet | control system enterprise architecture engineering information-control/management complex система управления архитектура предприятия инжиниринг информационно-управляющий комплекс система управління архітектура підприємств інжиніринг інформаційно-керувальний комплекс |
| url | https://journal.iasa.kpi.ua/article/view/236924 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT volkovavioletta modelsfordevelopmentoftheinformationcontrolcomplexoftheenterprise AT leonovaalla modelsfordevelopmentoftheinformationcontrolcomplexoftheenterprise AT loginovaalexandra modelsfordevelopmentoftheinformationcontrolcomplexoftheenterprise AT volkovavioletta modelidlârazvitiâinformacionnoupravlâûŝegokompleksapredpriâtiâ AT leonovaalla modelidlârazvitiâinformacionnoupravlâûŝegokompleksapredpriâtiâ AT loginovaalexandra modelidlârazvitiâinformacionnoupravlâûŝegokompleksapredpriâtiâ AT volkovavioletta modelídlârozvitkuínformacíjnokeruvalʹnogokopleksupídpriêmstva AT leonovaalla modelídlârozvitkuínformacíjnokeruvalʹnogokopleksupídpriêmstva AT loginovaalexandra modelídlârozvitkuínformacíjnokeruvalʹnogokopleksupídpriêmstva |