Методи дослідження стійкості виробничих процесів під час упровадження кіберфізичної системи
The article presents an analysis of the methods and criteria for assessing sustainability and the development of stabilization systems, proposed in the theory of automatic control, and studies of approaches to ensuring sustainability, proposed and applied in the practice of controlling production pr...
Збережено в:
| Дата: | 2021 |
|---|---|
| Автор: | |
| Формат: | Стаття |
| Мова: | Англійська |
| Опубліковано: |
The National Technical University of Ukraine "Igor Sikorsky Kyiv Polytechnic Institute"
2021
|
| Теми: | |
| Онлайн доступ: | https://journal.iasa.kpi.ua/article/view/239874 |
| Теги: |
Додати тег
Немає тегів, Будьте першим, хто поставить тег для цього запису!
|
| Назва журналу: | System research and information technologies |
| Завантажити файл: |  |
Репозитарії
System research and information technologies| _version_ | 1867334417918197760 |
|---|---|
| author | Kudriavtceva, Arina |
| author_facet | Kudriavtceva, Arina |
| author_institution_txt_mv | [
{
"author": "Arina Kudriavtceva",
"institution": "Peter the Great St. Petersburg Polytechnic University, St. Petersburg"
}
] |
| author_sort | Kudriavtceva, Arina |
| baseUrl_str | http://journal.iasa.kpi.ua/oai |
| collection | OJS |
| datestamp_date | 2021-09-16T11:48:22Z |
| description | The article presents an analysis of the methods and criteria for assessing sustainability and the development of stabilization systems, proposed in the theory of automatic control, and studies of approaches to ensuring sustainability, proposed and applied in the practice of controlling production processes. It is proposed to develop models when introducing a cyber-physical system of a production enterprise, combining the ideas of stabilization systems developed in the theory of automatic control, and methods of the theory and practice of managing production processes, while controlling the sustainability based on the laws and methods of systems theory and system analysis. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.20535/SRIT.2308-8893.2021.2.05 |
| first_indexed | 2025-07-17T10:27:26Z |
| format | Article |
| fulltext |
A. Kudriavtceva, 2021
64 ISSN 1681–6048 System Research & Information Technologies, 2021, № 2
UDC 303.732
DOI: 10.20535/SRIT.2308-8893.2021.2.05
METHODS FOR RESEARCHING THE SUSTAINABILITY
OF PRODUCTION PROCESSES WHEN IMPLEMENTING
A CYBER-PHYSICAL SYSTEM
A. KUDRIAVTCEVA
Abstract. The article presents an analysis of the methods and criteria for assessing
sustainability and the development of stabilization systems, proposed in the theory
of automatic control, and studies of approaches to ensuring sustainability, proposed
and applied in the practice of controlling production processes. It is proposed to de-
velop models when introducing a cyber-physical system of a production enterprise,
combining the ideas of stabilization systems developed in the theory of automatic
control, and methods of the theory and practice of managing production processes,
while controlling the sustainability based on the laws and methods of systems theory
and system analysis.
Keywords: control, production process, sustainability, stabilization.
INTRODUCTION
The active development of innovative technologies has influenced the emergence
of a new concept of the cyber-physical system (CPS), which implies the integra-
tion of computing resources into physical processes.
Systems of this class should be considered as open systems with active
elements, since the properties of cyber-physical systems in the interaction of
innovative technologies approach the properties of living systems, which is
important to take into account when studying stability.
The relevance of the study of the features and prospects for the development
of cyber-physical systems is confirmed by the famous economist and ideologist of
the fourth industrial revolution K. Schwab. In his research, the author claims that
in terms of its scale, volume and complexity, “The fourth industrial revolution has
no analogues in the previous experience of mankind. New technologies unite
physical, informational and biological worlds and are capable of creating, on the
one hand, huge opportunities, on the other, a potential threat” [1].
Due to the initiatives of active elements and innovations, problems arise of
maintaining the stability of production processes, which, when innovative tech-
nologies interact, have the specific properties of open systems, which requires a
revision of the methods and criteria for assessing their stability. Moreover, the
sustainability management system should reflect changes in the activities of the
enterprise, assess their dynamics and predict the future state of the system. The
article provides a brief overview of methods for assessing stability in the theory of
automatic control, as well as methods for ensuring stability in the control of pro-
duction processes. A combination of the principles of stabilization, proposed in
the theory of automatic control, and the experience of assessing stability, used in
Methods for researching the sustainability of production processes when implementing
Системні дослідження та інформаційні технології, 2021, № 2 65
the practice of enterprise management, is proposed. Such a combination is pro-
posed to be made on the basis of an informational assessment of the degree of
integrity, which allows providing emergent properties arising in a cyber-physical
system as a result of the interaction of components.
Emergent properties in CPS arise due to the flexibility of the interaction of
components, which allows rebuilding processes in CPS, eliminating emerging
failures of production processes, rebuilding processes taking into account changes
in customer requirements, etc. Such a state of the system approaches the behavior
of living systems, which is called mobile equilibrium in the theory of open systems.
ASSESSMENT OF SUSTAINABILITY IN THE THEORY OF AUTOMATIC
CONTROL
For technical systems, a theory of sustainability was developed, the foundations
of which were laid by A. Poincaré and A.M. Lyapunov. The basis of this theory is
the mapping of situations by differential equations and methods for studying the
stabilization of systems, i.e. the ability of systems to return to a state of equilib-
rium after it has been removed from this state under the influence of external (or
in systems with active elements - internal) disturbing influences.
In this theory of automatic control, a fairly large number of methods and
models for ensuring stability, criteria for determining stability, were formed: the
Routh-Hurwitz, Nyquist, Mikhailov criteria.
Based on the analysis of these methods in relation to the problem under con-
sideration, it is useful to investigate the possibility of using the following stabili-
zation systems.
1. Locally optimal systems with minimization of the norm of the control
vector and a given decrease in the function А.М. Lyapunov for linear objects [2].
The solution )(* tx of the system of differential equatcions BuAxx with
the initial conditions 0)0( xx is Lyapunov stable if for any 0 there exists
0)( s , such that if
)()( 0
*
0 txtx , then )()( * txtx for all 0t .
The solution )(* tx of the system BuAxx is asymptotically stable if it is
Lyapunov stable and the condition is satisfied:
0)()(lim * txtx as t provided )0()0( *xx .
In this case, all solutions that are sufficiently close to )0(*x at the initial
moment of time gradually converge to )(* tx as t increases.
If the solution )(* tx is asymptotically stable and, moreover, from the
condition )0()0( *xx it follows that )()( * txtx texx )0()0( *
for all 0t , then the solution )(* tx is exponentially stable. In this case, all solutions
close to )0(*x at the initial moment converge to )(* tx at a rate (greater or equal),
which is determined by an exponential function with parameters , [3].
A. Kudriavtceva
ISSN 1681–6048 System Research & Information Technologies, 2021, № 2 66
The Lyapunov stability condition for systems is formulated as follows: “in a
stable system, the free component of the solution to the equation of dynamics,
written in deviations, should tend to zero, that is, decay” [2]. This implies the
stability condition for linear dynamical systems: the linear system will be stable if
all real roots and all real parts of the complex roots of the characteristic equation
corresponding to the original differential equation of free motion of the system
are negative, which gives exponentially decaying solutions [4].
2. Locally and interval optimal systems with minimization of the norm of
bounded coordinates and controls of nonlinear objects.
Let the equations of the object 1 0 0, , k k k k k kx Hx Fu y x x x e
stabilized by controls )(*
kkk Hxuu The equation of a closed nonlinear
locally optimal system has the form: )(*
1 kkkk HxFuHxx 00 xxk . For
the system to be stable, it is sufficient that the scalar parameter atisfies the
following algebraic inequality [5]
)
~
()2( 2
222
QPHFLFL
,
where )
~
( 2Q
is the minimum eigenvalue of some symmetric and positive definite
matrix )
~
(min)
~
(:
~
222 QQQ j
j
.
3. Locally or interval optimal systems with optimization of linear functionals
on the trajectories of nonlinear systems with an additive right-hand side (in coor-
dinates and controls) with bounded coordinates and controls.
4. Systems for optimal stabilization of programmed movements for objects
specified in paragraphs 1–3.
Let the difference operator of a linear or linearized dynamic object have the
form:
0
01 , xxFuHxx kkkk . As a result, the problem of calculating controls
for discrete time "plunges" into a countable number of problems: calculate a
family of numerical vectors that are solutions to optimization problems [6]:
zkk
k
sk
zkk
k
k
uk bzA
y
Cs
Czz
y
s
Tu | )(minarg
2
2
2
2
*
*
*
;
;
0
;
0
2
1
2
1
2
1
2
1
n
zk
k
k
k
xk
k
k
n
k
EQ
A
Ab
dQ
Hx
dQ
b
y
s
EQ
A
zA
22
2
T
1
T ,]|[, ]|[, ]|[ rzzuxsuszFEA kkkkkkkk .
5. Systems of optimal stabilization based on the R . Bellman equation with
bounded controls (the problem of Corresponding Member of the USSR Academy
of Sciences A. M. Letov).
For the equations of perturbed motion 0
0 )(), ,,( xtxtuxfx the quality
functional [5]:
)),((),,( kk
t
t
ttxduxJ
k
.
Methods for researching the sustainability of production processes when implementing
Системні дослідження та інформаційні технології, 2021, № 2 67
And the Lyapunov–Bellman function for the moments of time t and t s
will look like this:
)),((),,(min),( kk
t
t
u
ttxduxtxV
k
;
)),((),,(min)),(( kk
t
t
u
ttxduxststxV
k
.
Control u should deliver the minimum J for any value 0s . Then the
necessary optimality condition — the Bellman equation 0)],,()([min tuxxV
u
provides the minimum of the integral functional.
The above examples illustrate the development of stabilization systems in
the theory of automatic control, which can be useful in developing models for
managing production processes when introducing innovative technologies.
However, the concepts of balance, stabilization, stability in cyber-physical
systems, despite the seeming analogy with technical ones, are much more
complex concepts, and the methods of the automatic control theory are
insufficient. Therefore, the next section examines foreign and domestic works
containing methods for assessing the sustainability of production processes,
developed in the theory of organizational management.
ANALYSIS OF SUSTAINABILITY IN MANAGEMENT AND THEORY OF
ORGANIZATIONAL MANAGEMENT
Marc A. Rosen [7] considers engineering sustainability, namely sustainability,
which is an essential component of overall sustainability for human activity and
development. The author believes that options and ways to ensure engineering
stability can be achieved taking into account the key factors:
1. Sustainable resources.
2. Sustainable processes.
3. Increased efficiency.
4. Reducing the impact on the environment.
5. Implementation of other aspects of sustainability.
The article also shows that the use of efficiency tools such as environmental
tool analysis and life cycle analysis is essential to achieve engineering sus-
tainability. The concept of zero energy smart buildings and communities illus-
trates well the author’s ideas.
Evgenia Pavlovskaia [8] explores and analyzes the concepts of sustainability
criteria for sustainable production. The article discusses important critical issues
necessary for a deeper understanding of the sustainability criteria and their practi-
cal use. Sustainability Criteria Indicators refer to the instruments used to test and
evaluate the fulfillment of the sustainability criteria and progress towards sustain-
ability. Indicators can provide quantitative measurement and qualitative assess-
ment of human activity and its impact on the outside world [9], and should also
reflect the fulfillment of sustainability criteria.
A. Kudriavtceva
ISSN 1681–6048 System Research & Information Technologies, 2021, № 2 68
The research results highlight that sustainability criteria are not a well-
defined concept. Their content should be linked to an understanding of what is
sustainable development and sustainability in each specific industry.
The objectives of the sustainability criteria need to be explained and refined
so that they are easier to interpret and fulfill. A preliminary list of the main indi-
cators of sustainable production, according to the author, may include the follow-
ing parameters:
1. Use of energy and materials in the production process: energy and ma-
terials are saved, and the form of the applied energy and materials is most suitable
to achieve the desired result.
2. Natural environment, including human health: waste and environmentally
incompatible by-products are constantly being reduced, removed or recycled;
chemicals, physical agents, technologies and methods of work that pose a danger
to humans.
3. Economic performance: Management is committed to an open, participa-
tory process of continuous assessment and improvement focused on long-term
economic performance.
4. Products: products and packaging must be safe and environmentally
friendly throughout their entire life cycle; services are designed to be safe and
environmentally friendly [10].
The content of the list will differ depending on what is the subject of the
definition of sustainability: environmental protection, industrial development,
consumer interests.
In [11], the authors consider a holistic assessment of sustainability in pro-
duction. The study on the assessment of the sustainability of production [12] pre-
sents a structure for building a comprehensive assessment matrix of the entire life
cycle of a product, showing the following six elements of sustainability of pro-
duction:
1. Impact on the environment.
2. Impact on society (safety, health, ethics, etc.).
3. Functionality.
4. Optimal use of resources.
5. Performance.
6. Possibility of recycling / product recovery.
Moreover, the authors emphasize that modern sustainable production sys-
tems must be planned and managed as holistic socio-technological-ecological sys-
tems in terms of the entire life cycle [13], which requires the ability to think and
communicate systematically, or systems thinking becomes an important ability
that must be developed to enhance the design and control of such systems [14].
The authors also argue that sustainable manufacturing starts with developing
a new product that can use the right materials and manufacturing processes. This
is because the manufacturing system requires new innovations and more sustain-
able approaches to manufacturing. As raw materials are depleted, advanced mate-
rials research requires clearer research and training for engineers and scien-
tists [11].
Design and manufacturing methods, according to the authors of [15], cur-
rently have to undergo major changes to include problems that cover the entire
Methods for researching the sustainability of production processes when implementing
Системні дослідження та інформаційні технології, 2021, № 2 69
traditional product life cycle. New design methodologies, innovative manufactur-
ing technologies, and effective tools must be developed concurrently and address
common life cycle issues, including (Fig. 1):
Reduced production costs.
Reduced product development time.
Reduced material use.
Reduced energy consumption.
Reduction of industrial waste.
Repair, reuse, refurbishment and recycling of used ones.
Products / materials.
Environmental and social issues.
This paradigm shift in product design and manufacturing requires the
development of optimization models that incorporate environmentally friendly,
energy efficient, lean manufacturing methods that take into account disassembly,
reuse, re-production and recycling. It promotes systems thinking when developing
new products and processes and requires attention to the interests of all
stakeholders. This requires the development of new design methodologies,
manufacturing processes, post-use processes, and enterprise resource planning to
simultaneously achieve multiple production efficiency goals.
Ljungberg L.Y. [16] reviews current practices for sustainable product develop-
ment and identifies four major challenges inherent in sustainable production:
Excessive consumption.
Utilization of resources.
Pollution.
Excess population
The author also argues that excessive consumption of energy, packaging and
transportation has serious consequences in the long term.
Shotylo D.M. [17] define the sustainability of the production system as the
ability of the production system in the course of its activity under the influence of
the environment to achieve the specified goals in the established time interval,
without changing the elements, structure and processes included in it. At the same
time, the essence of sustainability is manifested in the ability of the production
system to preserve the integrity of the entire structure and its individual links, to
Fig. 1. Sustainable Manufacturing Process Diagram
A. Kudriavtceva
ISSN 1681–6048 System Research & Information Technologies, 2021, № 2 70
perform stable functions assigned to it and preserve its main functional parame-
ters, to maintain a stable level of output characteristics in the presence of various
kinds of external and internal deviating influences, to timely material and techni-
cal, transport and information services at a given level of quality of these proc-
esses (Table 1).
T a b l e 1 . The essence of sustainability in a production system
The essence of sustainability of the production system
The ability of the production system to maintain the integrity of the entire structure and
its individual links
The ability of the production system to stably perform the assigned functions
and maintain its basic functional parameters
The ability of a production system to maintain a stable level of output characteristics
in the presence of various kinds of external and internal deflecting influences
The ability of the production system to provide timely and uninterrupted material, tech-
nical, transport and information services at a given level of quality
of these processes
The ability of the production system to maintain established economic ties within the
production chain (stable ties with suppliers, consumers, financial institutions)
The ability of the production system to maintain its competitive position
in the market
The ability of a production system to restore its elements, processes and functions
in the original state, or close, established within specified limits
The ability of a production system to withstand environmental influences
PROSPECTS FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF METHODS FOR RESEARCHING
THE SUSTAINABILITY OF CYBER-PHYSICAL SYSTEMS
With the development of cyber-physical systems, the components of production
processes continuously exchange information with computing platforms, sensors,
network structure, operators, i.e. emerging situations need to be displayed using
an open system model with active elements.
With the interaction of CPS elements, the emergence effect may occur, the
appearance of new properties that are absent in the elements. For example, it be-
comes possible to adjust the production process, eliminate failures. At the same
time, negative effects are also possible, which can lead to instability of the pro-
duction process.
To manage the sustainable development of a cyber-physical system, it is
necessary to constantly monitor the state of maintaining its integrity. For this,
models are being developed based on the application of the information approach
of A.A. Denisov [18], who introduced comparative quantitative assessments of
hierarchical structures in terms of the degree of integrity. Research has shown that
any developing system is between the state of absolute integrity and absolute
freedom of elements:
1 ,
where / im CC is the degree of integrity, and is CC / is the utilization
rate of elements as a whole; sC , iC , mC — systemic, intrinsic and mutual com-
Methods for researching the sustainability of production processes when implementing
Системні дослідження та інформаційні технології, 2021, № 2 71
plexities of the system; J — information of perception; H informational essence
(potential); C assessment of the information complexity of the system JC .
Studies of the processes of interaction between the part and the whole in the
system have shown that with a tendency towards a decrease in the degree of
integrity, the system can disintegrate into parts that will function stably. But at the
same time, useful properties arising as a result of the emergence effect will be
lost. A large increase in the degree of integrity should provide stability. However,
this can suppress the properties of active elements that provide useful properties
for which the CPS is created.
Thus, it can be assumed that there should be a certain range of the degree of
integrity in which the CPS will function stably and perform the functions for
which it is created. Then the problem arises of finding ways to measure . It
seems promising to establish the relationship of this range with the criteria for
assessing stability, developed in the theory of automatic control, and indicators
proposed in the works discussed in section 2.
When managing the development of cyber-physical systems, the task of
comparative analysis and selection of innovative technologies also arises, taking
into account their characteristics, capabilities and usefulness. At present, some
studies have already been carried out, published in articles [19–23].
Further development of the presented work presupposes the application of
the methods of the laws of systems theory and the information approach of
A.A. Denisov for the development of models of interaction of system elements.
CONCLUSION
The article presents an analysis of the methods and criteria for assessing stability
and the development of stabilization systems, proposed in the theory of automatic
control, and studies of approaches to ensuring stability, proposed in the practice
of managing production processes.
It is proposed to develop models when introducing a cyber-physical system
of a production enterprise, combining the ideas of stabilization systems developed
in the theory of automatic control, and methods of controlling production
processes, controlling stability based on assessing the degree of system integrity.
Based on the study, it was concluded that the degree of integrity of such systems
should be within certain limits, since: 1) an increase in the degree of integrity,
determined by tighter control of the number and strength of interconnections
between the CPS components, provides greater stability of the system’s
functioning, but at the same time less freedom of interaction of its components,
which leads to a decrease in the possibility of manifestation of emergent
properties; 2) a decrease in the degree of integrity (the degree of control of
interactions between system components) leads to too independent behavior of
the CPS components, a decrease in the stability of its functioning. The idea of
using estimates of the degree of integrity and degree of freedom of elements was
proposed in the information theory by A.A. Denisov [18], in which these
assessments are used to study organizational systems and are obtained on the
basis of assessing the structures of systems. For the study of processes in cyber-
physical systems, such assessments are proposed to be applied for the first time.
With the continuation of the work, it is assumed 1) to develop models for
assessing the degree of integrity in the context of complex graphs, displaying the
interactions of components in cyber-physical systems, based on the fundamental
A. Kudriavtceva
ISSN 1681–6048 System Research & Information Technologies, 2021, № 2 72
principles of control, taken into account in the theory of automatic control when
assessing the stability of systems; 2) taking into account that the models for
evaluating arbitrary graphs can turn out to be difficult for practical application,
studies will be carried out on the possibility of comparing information
assessments of the degree of integrity with the criteria for assessing the
sustainability of production processes when introducing a cyber-physical system
used in the practice of managing enterprises, and determining the range of
assessments of the degree of within which it is possible to realize the emergent
properties of CPS while maintaining sufficient stability.
REFERENCES
1. K. Shvab, Chetvertaya promyshlennaya revolyutsiya [The Fourth Industrial Revolu-
tion]. Moscow: «E» Publ., 2017, 208 p.
2. A.M. Lyapunov, The general problem of motion stability; Vol. 2. M.: Izd-vo
AN SSSR Publ, 1956.
3. A.A. Voronov, Fundamentals of the theory of automatic control. M.: Ener-
giya, 1980, 312 p.
4. Theory of automatic regulation; ed. V.V. Solodovnikova. M.: Mashinos-
troyeniye Publ., 1967.
5. V.N. Kozlov, V.E. Kupriyanov, and V.N. Shashikhin, Management of energy sys-
tems; part 1. Theory of automatic control. St. Petersburg: Publishing house of Poly-
technic University, 2008.
6. A.A. Efremov, V.N. Kozlov, and V. Karakchieva, Part 2: collection of scientific pa-
pers of the XXIV International Scientific and Educational-Practical Conference, Oc-
tober 13-14, 2020; under total ed. V.N. Kozlova, A.N. Firsova. SPb.: POLYTECH-
EXPRESS, 2020.
7. Marc A. Rosen, “Engineering Sustainability: A Technical Approach to Sustainabil-
ity”, Sustainability, 2012.
8. Evgenia Pavlovskaia, “Sustainability criteria: their indicators, control, and monitor-
ing (with examples from the biofuel sector)”, Environmental Sciences Europe, 26, 2014.
9. National Research Council of the National Academies: Toward Sustainable Agricul-
tural Systems in the 21st Century. Washington, DC: The National Academies, 2010.
10. V. Veleva and M. Ellenbecker, “Indicators of sustainable production: framework and
methodology”, J. Cleaner Product, 9(6), pp. 519–549, 2001.
11. Abdullahi Tijjani and Salem Abdullah Bagaber, “Sustainability Considerations in
Manufacturing and Operation Management”, International Journal of Scientific En-
gineering and Applied Science (IJSEAS), vol. 1, issue 4, July 2015.
12. F. Badurdeen, A. Jayal, and I. Jawahir, “Towardsa System Approach for De-
veloping, Sustainable Products from Sustainable Manufacturing”, in Banga-
lore Workshop, Bangalore India, 2009.
13. C. Soderquist and S. Overakker, “Education for sustainable development: a sys-
tems thinking approach”, Global Environmental Research, 14, pp. 193–202, 2010.
14. F. Badurdeen et al., Sustainable Value Creation in Manufacturing at Product
and Process Levels: Metrics-Based Evaluation, 2014.
15. I.S. Jawahir and Fazleena Badurdeen, “Innovation in sustainable manufacturing edu-
cation”, 11th Global Conference on Sustainable Manufacturing, 2013.
16. L.Y. Ljungberg, “Materials selection and design for development of sustainable
products”, Materials & Design, 28(2), pp. 466–479, 2007.
17. D.M. Shotylo, “The essence and content of the sustainability of the production sys-
tem. Organization of production”, ECONOMINFO, no. 6, 2006.
18. A.A. Denisov, Sovremennye problemy sistemnogo analiza: uchebnik [Modern
problems of system analysis: a textbook]. SPb.: 3-e izd. Politekhn. un-ta Publ, 2008, 304 p.
Methods for researching the sustainability of production processes when implementing
Системні дослідження та інформаційні технології, 2021, № 2 73
19. V.N. Volkova, A.V. Loginova, L.V. Chernenkaja, E.V. Romanova, Y.Y. Chernyy,
and V.E. Lankin, “Problems of Sustainable Development of Socio-Economic Sys-
tems in the Implementation of Innovations”, Proceedings of the 3rd International
Conference on Human Factors in Complex Technical Systems and Environments,
Ergo-2018, 3, pp. 53–56.
20. V.N. Volkova and Yu.Yu. Chernyi, “Application of Systems Theory Laws for Inves-
tigating Information Security Problems”, Automatic Control and Computer Sciences,
vol. 52, no. 8, pp. 1164–1170, 2018.
21. V.N. Volkova and V.Ye. Lankin, “Problema ustoychivosti sotsial’no-
ekonomicheskoy sistemy v usloviyakh vnedreniya innovatsiy chetvertoy pro-
myshlennoy revolyutsii [The problem of the sustainability of the socioeconomic
system in the context of innovation of the fourth industrial revolution]”, Ekonomika i
upravleniye: problemy i resheniya, 77 (6), pp. 25–29. 2018.
22. V. Volkova, A. Loginova, and A. Kudriavtceva, “Management of enterprise cyber-
physical systems sustainable development while undergoing a digital transformation”,
IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, 940(1), 2020.
23. V. Volkova, F. Tarasenko, V. Kozlov, and A. Kudriavtceva, “On further develop-
ment of the control theory of automated complexes in the information-
communication technologies implementation”, Proceedings of the XI International
Scientific Conference “Communicative strategies of Information Society”, 25–26
October 2019, Saint-Petersburg, Russia.
Received 24.12.2020
INFORMATION ON THE ARTICLE
Arina S. Kudriavtceva, Peter the Great St. Petersburg Polytechnic University, Russia, e-
mail: arinkin94@mail.ru
МЕТОДИ ДОСЛІДЖЕННЯ СТІЙКОСТІ ВИРОБНИЧИХ ПРОЦЕСІВ ПІД
ЧАС УПРОВАДЖЕННЯ КІБЕРФІЗИЧНОЇ СИСТЕМИ / А.С. Кудрявцева
Анотація. Подано аналіз методів і критеріїв оцінювання стійкості і розроб-
лення систем стабілізації, розроблених у теорії автоматичного керування, і до-
сліджень підходів до забезпечення стійкості, пропонованих і застосовуваних у
практиці керування виробничими процесами. Запропоновано під час упрова-
дження кіберфізичної системи виробничого підприємства розробляти моделі,
об’єднуючи ідеї систем стабілізації, розроблені в теорії автоматичного керу-
вання, і методи теорії і практики керування виробничими процесами, контро-
люючи стійкість на основі закономірностей і методів теорії систем і системно-
го аналізу.
Ключові слова: керування, виробничі процеси, стійкість, стабілізація.
МЕТОДЫ ИССЛЕДОВАНИЯ УСТОЙЧИВОСТИ ПРОИЗВОДСТВЕННЫХ
ПРОЦЕССОВ ПРИ ВНЕДРЕНИИ КИБЕРФИЗИЧЕСКОЙ СИСТЕМЫ
/А.С. Кудрявцева
Аннотация. Представлен анализ методов и критериев оценки устойчивости и
разработки систем стабилизации, разработанных в теории автоматического
управления, и исследований подходов к обеспечению устойчивости, предлага-
емых и применяемых в практике управления производственными процессами.
Предложено при внедрении киберфизической системы производственного
предприятия разрабатывать модели, объединяя идеи систем стабилизации, ра-
зработанные в теории автоматического управления, и методы теории и прак-
тики управления производственными процессами, контролируя устойчивость
на основе закономерностей и методов теории систем и системного анализа.
Ключевые слова: управление, производственные процессы, устойчивость,
стабилизация.
|
| id | journaliasakpiua-article-239874 |
| institution | System research and information technologies |
| keywords_txt_mv | keywords |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2025-07-17T10:27:26Z |
| publishDate | 2021 |
| publisher | The National Technical University of Ukraine "Igor Sikorsky Kyiv Polytechnic Institute" |
| record_format | ojs |
| resource_txt_mv | journaliasakpiua/3e/15984f9a8512366586c9328ed2f32b3e.pdf |
| spelling | journaliasakpiua-article-2398742021-09-16T11:48:22Z Methods for researching the sustainability of production processes when implementing a cyber-physical system Методы исследования устойчивости производственных процессов при внедрении киберфизической системы Методи дослідження стійкості виробничих процесів під час упровадження кіберфізичної системи Kudriavtceva, Arina керування виробничі процеси стійкість стабілізація управление производственные процессы устойчивость стабилизация control production process sustainability stabilization The article presents an analysis of the methods and criteria for assessing sustainability and the development of stabilization systems, proposed in the theory of automatic control, and studies of approaches to ensuring sustainability, proposed and applied in the practice of controlling production processes. It is proposed to develop models when introducing a cyber-physical system of a production enterprise, combining the ideas of stabilization systems developed in the theory of automatic control, and methods of the theory and practice of managing production processes, while controlling the sustainability based on the laws and methods of systems theory and system analysis. Представлен анализ методов и критериев оценки устойчивости и разработки систем стабилизации, разработанных в теории автоматического управления, и исследований подходов к обеспечению устойчивости, предлагаемых и применяемых в практике управления производственными процессами. Предложено при внедрении киберфизической системы производственного предприятия разрабатывать модели, объединяя идеи систем стабилизации, разработанные в теории автоматического управления, и методы теории и практики управления производственными процессами, контролируя устойчивость на основе закономерностей и методов теории систем и системного анализа. Подано аналіз методів і критеріїв оцінювання стійкості і розроблення систем стабілізації, розроблених у теорії автоматичного керування, і досліджень підходів до забезпечення стійкості, пропонованих і застосовуваних у практиці керування виробничими процесами. Запропоновано під час упровадження кіберфізичної системи виробничого підприємства розробляти моделі, об’єднуючи ідеї систем стабілізації, розроблені в теорії автоматичного керування, і методи теорії і практики керування виробничими процесами, контролюючи стійкість на основі закономірностей і методів теорії систем і системного аналізу. The National Technical University of Ukraine "Igor Sikorsky Kyiv Polytechnic Institute" 2021-09-14 Article Article application/pdf https://journal.iasa.kpi.ua/article/view/239874 10.20535/SRIT.2308-8893.2021.2.05 System research and information technologies; No. 2 (2021); 64-73 Системные исследования и информационные технологии; № 2 (2021); 64-73 Системні дослідження та інформаційні технології; № 2 (2021); 64-73 2308-8893 1681-6048 en https://journal.iasa.kpi.ua/article/view/239874/238272 |
| spellingShingle | керування виробничі процеси стійкість стабілізація Kudriavtceva, Arina Методи дослідження стійкості виробничих процесів під час упровадження кіберфізичної системи |
| title | Методи дослідження стійкості виробничих процесів під час упровадження кіберфізичної системи |
| title_alt | Methods for researching the sustainability of production processes when implementing a cyber-physical system Методы исследования устойчивости производственных процессов при внедрении киберфизической системы |
| title_full | Методи дослідження стійкості виробничих процесів під час упровадження кіберфізичної системи |
| title_fullStr | Методи дослідження стійкості виробничих процесів під час упровадження кіберфізичної системи |
| title_full_unstemmed | Методи дослідження стійкості виробничих процесів під час упровадження кіберфізичної системи |
| title_short | Методи дослідження стійкості виробничих процесів під час упровадження кіберфізичної системи |
| title_sort | методи дослідження стійкості виробничих процесів під час упровадження кіберфізичної системи |
| topic | керування виробничі процеси стійкість стабілізація |
| topic_facet | керування виробничі процеси стійкість стабілізація управление производственные процессы устойчивость стабилизация control production process sustainability stabilization |
| url | https://journal.iasa.kpi.ua/article/view/239874 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT kudriavtcevaarina methodsforresearchingthesustainabilityofproductionprocesseswhenimplementingacyberphysicalsystem AT kudriavtcevaarina metodyissledovaniâustojčivostiproizvodstvennyhprocessovprivnedreniikiberfizičeskojsistemy AT kudriavtcevaarina metodidoslídžennâstíjkostívirobničihprocesívpídčasuprovadžennâkíberfízičnoísistemi |