Прогнозування якості технологічних процесів методами штучних нейронних мереж

A set of models of feed-forward neural networks has been created to obtain operational forecasts of the quality of mechanical engineering processes. It is established that the use of the Back Propagation of Error machine learning algorithm allows for obtaining forecasted estimates for the controlled...

Повний опис

Збережено в:
Бібліографічні деталі
Дата:2025
Автори: Fedin, Serhii, Romaniuk, Oksana, Trishch, Roman
Формат: Стаття
Мова:Англійська
Опубліковано: The National Technical University of Ukraine "Igor Sikorsky Kyiv Polytechnic Institute" 2025
Теми:
Онлайн доступ:https://journal.iasa.kpi.ua/article/view/343080
Теги: Додати тег
Немає тегів, Будьте першим, хто поставить тег для цього запису!
Назва журналу:System research and information technologies
Завантажити файл: Pdf

Репозитарії

System research and information technologies
_version_ 1867334453873868800
author Fedin, Serhii
Romaniuk, Oksana
Trishch, Roman
author_facet Fedin, Serhii
Romaniuk, Oksana
Trishch, Roman
author_institution_txt_mv [ { "author": "Serhii Fedin", "institution": "National Transport University, Kyiv" }, { "author": "Oksana Romaniuk", "institution": "Open International University of Human Development “Ukraine”, Kyiv" }, { "author": "Roman Trishch", "institution": "National Aerospace University \"Kharkiv Aviation Institute\", Kharkiv" } ]
author_sort Fedin, Serhii
baseUrl_str http://journal.iasa.kpi.ua/oai
collection OJS
datestamp_date 2025-11-09T00:01:30Z
description A set of models of feed-forward neural networks has been created to obtain operational forecasts of the quality of mechanical engineering processes. It is established that the use of the Back Propagation of Error machine learning algorithm allows for obtaining forecasted estimates for the controlled parameter of the metalworking process with significantly smaller ranges of the mean absolute percentage error, mean square error, relative approximation error, and variance ratio criterion compared to the BFGS algorithm. It is shown that the proposed MLP neural network models can be recommended for practical applications in controlling the accuracy of the machining process of shaft-type parts.
doi_str_mv 10.20535/SRIT.2308-8893.2025.3.09
first_indexed 2025-11-09T02:11:03Z
format Article
fulltext  S.S. Fedin, O.O. Romaniuk, R.M. Trishch, 2025 Системні дослідження та інформаційні технології, 2025, № 3 113 UDC 658.562:004.855.5 DOI: 10.20535/SRIT.2308-8893.2025.3.09 FORECASTING THE QUALITY OF TECHNOLOGICAL PROCESSES BY METHODS OF ARTIFICIAL NEURAL NETWORKS S.S. FEDIN, O.O. ROMANIUK, R.M. TRISHCH Abstract. A set of models of feed-forward neural networks has been created to ob- tain operational forecasts of the quality of mechanical engineering processes. It is established that the use of the Back Propagation of Error machine learning algorithm allows for obtaining forecasted estimates for the controlled parameter of the metal- working process with significantly smaller ranges of the mean absolute percentage error, mean square error, relative approximation error, and variance ratio criterion compared to the BFGS algorithm. It is shown that the proposed MLP neural network models can be recommended for practical applications in controlling the accuracy of the machining process of shaft-type parts. Keywords: accuracy, details, quality, forecasting, machine learning, neural network, technological process. INTRODUCTION In modern conditions of information development and intellectualization of vari- ous industries, an urgent problem is the application of management methods based on quantitative assessment of quality indicators of technological processes. According to DSTU 2925-94, quality is a set of characteristics of a product (proc- ess, service) that relate to its ability to meet established and foreseeable needs [1]. In other words, it is a measure of the compliance of a certain multicriteria process with expectations or requirements, which can be presented, for example, in the form of functionally dependent statistics proposed in scientific publications [2; 3] for socio-economic systems or processes in the energy sector [4–9]. At the same time, one of the urgent problems in the modern machine-building industry is to improve the quality and efficiency of high-precision machining, the complexity of which is associated with the fact that the cutting process on well-established machines is characterized by instability and a multitude of interrelated variables [10]. Cutting conditions dynamically change randomly due to the influence of various disturbing factors: scatter of allowances, variation in the hardness and structure of the work piece metal, continuously changing cutting properties of the tool, etc. [11]. In addition, quality indicators depend on the stiffness and thermal deformation of the elements of the technological system, the nature and parame- ters of the relative vibrations of the tool and the work piece, etc. According to DSTU 3514-97, one of the quality indicators of technological process is accuracy, i.e. a property that determines the proximity of actual and nominal values of parameters according to their probability distribution [12]. In this case, the control of the process accuracy is reduced to forecasting the machining error at a certain point in time (or during a given machining cycle) and S.S. Fedin, O.O. Romaniuk, R.M. Trishch ISSN 1681–6048 System Research & Information Technologies, 2025, № 3 114 introducing a corrective action (a readjustment pulse) to shift the tool by the fore- casted value [13]. Machining errors have systematic and random components and are essentially random variables, for the forecasting of which it is necessary to know the probable estimates of the distribution and stability characteristics over time, fixing the value of the controlled parameter of each details that is consistently manufactured [14]. These fixed values are the basis for building analytical models and control charts that can be used to estimate the components of the total machining error:  a systematic component — to eliminate the scattering centers of the con- trolled parameter of the details (setting level);  a random component — for the displacement of the dimensions of details from the centers of scattering (according to the instantaneous distribution of di- mensional deviations under the constant action of external factors within con- trolled limits) [13]. It should be noted that the principle of using control charts and analytical models to synthesize algorithms of existing systems for controlling the accuracy of metalworking processes has some drawbacks, namely:  the estimation of the distribution parameters should be based on the as- sumption that the machine setup level remains unchanged, but the center of the details size dispersion is shifted randomly;  the use of control cards allows you to adjust the parameters of the ma- chining equipment (machine) after evaluating the results of the previous detail before the start of production of the next detail and, thus, control is carried out off-line. One of the ways to technologically ensure the accuracy of machining proc- esses is to introduce corrective actions in automated machine control systems based on the results of forecasting deviations of the controlled parameters of de- tails based on adaptive artificial intelligence models [15]. The modern approach to adaptive management requires the model to be able to automatically change its structure or algorithm of functioning. However, the effective practical application of control algorithms depends on their flexibility and learning ability [16]. Therefore, an urgent task is to improve the accuracy of the adaptation process when changing on-line technological parameters using self-tuning models. Such information models can be more adaptive due to recon- figuration (retraining) on the basis of retrospective statistical information when the parameters of the details machining process change in order to determine or adjust the control law and, as a consequence, to ensure the quality of the metal- working process. Taking into account the conditions of nonlinear dynamics of technological parameters, the efficiency of adaptive control of metalworking pro- cesses can be significantly increased by using models of rectilinear artificial neu- ral networks (Multilayer Perceptron – MLP). At the same time, the joint use of MLP models and control cards will allow to realize the principle of information support for the accuracy of technological processes. PROBLEM DEFINITION The choice of the neural network modeling methodology for operational forecasting of the quality of technological processes is due to the following properties [17; 18]: Forecasting the quality of technological processes by methods of artificial neural networks Системні дослідження та інформаційні технології, 2025, № 3 115  first, neural networks are among the best methods for classifying patterns, approximating and extrapolating nonlinear functions, including non-stationary time series;  secondly, the presence of nonlinear activation functions in a multilayer neural network ensures the effective implementation of any nonlinear mappings X→Y with a given accuracy for the identification and control of complex nonlin- ear technical objects;  thirdly, the parallelism of neural networks is a prerequisite for the ef- fective implementation of software and hardware support for neural network controllers, which allow, on the basis of quantitative retrospective informa- tion, to provide on-line control of the metalworking process based on the fore- casted discrete values of the controlled parameter of the details that are se- quentially manufactured. Consider a discrete process with one input )(ty , for which each subsequent output value )1( ty depends only on the previous value )](..., ),1( ),([)1( qtytytyfty p  , (1) where y is an input/output, t is a discrete integer time, q is a nonnegative integer, and )(pf a function. The task is to control an object that is described by expression (1) based on learning. The control must be performed in such a way that the output signal cor- responds to a reference signal )(tr , subject of minimizing a certain norm )()()( tytrte  . In this case, the a priori quantitative information about the con- trol object is the value q, which is an estimate of the value q of expression (1). This task can be solved on the basis of MLP models, the adaptive properties of which allow us to consider their various architectures and configurations in the structure of a neurocontroller or neuroemulator [19]. Given a given estimate of q, an MLP-type neural network model with 1 qn inputs and one output 1m can be used to model the function )(pf of expression (1). Denoting the mapping performed by the neuroemulator of the con- trol object as )(E and its output as 1y , we obtain )(1 EE xy  , where nxE  is an n-dimensional vector. For case T)](..., ),1( ),([)( qtytytytxE  — the goal of neurosimulator machine learning is to minimise a norm of error )(txE T)](..., ),1( ),([ qtytyty  . RESEARCH OBJECTIVE The aim of the work is to create adaptive models of feed-forward neural networks for operational forecasting of the quality of mechanical engineering processes by the accuracy parameter of cylindrical details of the “shaft” type. S.S. Fedin, O.O. Romaniuk, R.M. Trishch ISSN 1681–6048 System Research & Information Technologies, 2025, № 3 116 Literature review. One of the ways to solve the problem of quality assur- ance by increasing the accuracy and productivity of machining details is to use on-line tracking automatic control systems in machine tools. In particular, the fundamental research conducted by B.S. Balakshin made it possible to establish links between the factors acting in the process of machining details and to formal- ize the mechanisms of error formation [20]. In modern industrial production, technological process control is based on the use of methods and means of active control of the quality of manufactured products. In the studies of by S.S. Volosov [21] and M.S. Nevelson [22] show that the most effective means of active control are automatic or combined systems that implement the principle of adaptive control. Studies [23; 24] note that the current level of development and improvement of methods and means of active control requires the introduction of adaptive systems for monitoring technological proc- esses based on artificial intelligence technologies, in particular, neural network modeling. For example, S.V. Bilenko [23] developed methods for identifying the state and intelligent control of the machining process, aimed at determining the optimal cutting mode with a minimum amount of a priori information for con- tinuous correction of this mode in the face of disturbances in the dynamic system of the machine tool. In the paper A.P. Nikishechkin [24] proposed the principles of constructing neural network adaptive control systems for metalworking proc- esses and created a method for synthesizing neural network components of an adaptive control system directly in the process of its operation. The work of P.D. Wasserman [25] shows that when choosing a neural network architecture for forecasting, several configurations with different numbers of hidden neurons are usually tested. At the same time, an effective solution to the problem of time se- ries forecasting based on the use of MLP models is shown. An adaptive MLP model was proposed in [26] to determine the structure of the time series of devia- tions of the diameter of shaft-type details from the nominal size and to forecast the accuracy of the technological process of machining details by a controlled parameter. It is shown that the use of such a model under the condition of non- stationarity of the controlled parameters of product quality allows obtaining reli- able information about the future state of the technological process and increasing the efficiency of quality management in real time. Paper [27] shows that for qual- ity management at a separate stage of the technological process in the conditions of noisy input information, one of the effective methods is the use of two-layer MLPs with the Back Propagation of Error learning algorithm. Paper [28] proposes a model of a feed-forward neural network for forecast- ing and controlling production, the practical application of which is aimed at im- plementing a mechanism for controlling continuous multi-stage production proc- esses without intermediate outputs. Study [29] proposes a method of using neural networks to identify product defects and make corrective changes to the techno- logical process in order to manage its quality. It should be noted that the construction of neurocontrollers is an important area of application of neurocontrol in metalworking to ensure the quality of tech- nological processes. Thus, in [30], a method was formalized for creating neural- index models designed to plan the process of machining rotating details based on typical examples. Study [31] proposes a controller for optimizing the milling pro- cess, in which modeling based on artificial neural networks is used to learn the correspondence between the inputs and outputs of the technological process. Tianjin University (China) has developed a milling process control technology based on the use of a three-layer neural network with the Back Propagation of Forecasting the quality of technological processes by methods of artificial neural networks Системні дослідження та інформаційні технології, 2025, № 3 117 Error machine learning algorithm and performed simulations for different proc- essing modes with experimental confirmation of the effectiveness of the proposed control technology [32]. Thus, the literature review shows the relevance of scientific and practical re- search aimed at managing the quality of technological processes of machining sequentially machined details based on methods for forecasting the accuracy of their manufacture using adaptive neural networks. MATERIALS AND METHODS The controlled parameter of sequentially machined details is the accuracy of the cylindrical surface diameter of the shaft detail, namely the deviation of the actual surface size from its nominal value within the tolerance field. The tolerance field and the nominal value are determined by the requirements of the relevant stan- dards and design documentation. The data for creating neural network models are presented in the form of di- ameter deviations of 50 consecutively machined details of the shaft type 50h11 made of St45 steel within the tolerance field of a controlled size of 200 μm [26]. Thus, the time series of diameter deviations contains 25 values for each of the 2 realizations of the machining process obtained between machine tool adjustments under the same roughing modes (Table 1). T a b l e 1 . Deviation of the controlled size of details of the type shaft 50h11 from the nominal value of y, μm [33] Detail number Implementation No. 1 Implementation No. 2 1 24 38 2 36 49 3 35 55 4 44 61 5 50 76 6 55 80 7 76 71 8 75 88 9 63 93 10 84 85 11 88 105 12 80 90 13 103 101 14 90 110 15 100 92 16 105 133 17 91 125 18 129 128 19 125 152 20 115 143 21 142 166 22 149 167 23 158 165 24 183 169 25 185 173 S.S. Fedin, O.O. Romaniuk, R.M. Trishch ISSN 1681–6048 System Research & Information Technologies, 2025, № 3 118 To build neural network forecasted models, examples of the training sample were obtained using the sliding window method ix and 1ix , which moves along the time sequence of retrospective data of deviations of the controlled parameter (Table 1) with a step equal to one processing cycle (one detail). In this case, the data in the window xi are the inputs of the neural network, and the data of the sec- ond window nix  are the outputs. Thus, training samples are instantaneous samples of values of the controlled parameter of sequentially machined details, represented as a time series shifted relative to the initial values ix with a lag of one machining cycle, which corre- sponds to the process (1). When forming examples of training sample, it is advisable to divide the time series of the forecasted indicator by ix into 20,,5n values, as this range characterizes the volume of instantaneous sampling of deviations of details di- mensions from nominal values, accepted in mechanical engineering [13; 34]. Tak- ing into account this range and the total volume of realizations No. 1 and No. 2, which is equal to 25 values of deviations of details dimensions, a training set with 6n inputs corresponding to the values of a sequentially shifted (by five levels) time series of deviations of details dimensions was created. In this case, the output 1m determines the “reference” value of the deviation of the size of each subse- quent detail – y. Thus, the number of examples (facts) of the training sample from implementation No. 1 is 19625  (Table 2). T a b l e 2 . Training sample based on data from implementation No. 1 Example number x1 x2 x3 x4 x5 x6 y 1 24 36 35 44 50 55 76 2 36 35 44 50 55 76 75 3 35 44 50 55 76 75 63 4 44 50 55 76 75 63 84 5 50 55 76 75 63 84 88 6 55 76 75 63 84 88 80 7 76 75 63 84 88 80 103 8 75 63 84 88 80 103 90 9 63 84 88 80 103 90 100 10 84 88 80 103 90 100 105 11 88 80 103 90 100 105 91 12 80 103 90 100 105 91 129 13 103 90 100 105 91 129 125 14 90 100 105 91 129 125 115 15 100 105 91 129 125 115 142 16 105 91 129 125 115 142 149 17 91 129 125 115 142 149 158 18 129 125 115 142 149 158 183 19 125 115 142 149 158 183 185 To obtain forecaster estimates of the accuracy of the technological process, a second sample of 19 examples was prepared, characterizing the values of devia- tions in the shaft diameter of each consecutively manufactured detail from im- plementation No. 2 (Table 3). Forecasting the quality of technological processes by methods of artificial neural networks Системні дослідження та інформаційні технології, 2025, № 3 119 T a b l e 3 . Forecasted sample based on the data from implementation No. 2 Example number x1 x2 x3 x4 x5 x6 y 1 38 49 55 61 76 80 71 2 49 55 61 76 80 71 88 3 55 61 76 80 71 88 93 4 61 76 80 71 88 93 85 5 76 80 71 88 93 85 105 6 80 71 88 93 85 105 90 7 71 88 93 85 105 90 101 8 88 93 85 105 90 101 110 9 93 85 105 90 101 110 92 10 85 105 90 101 110 92 133 11 105 90 101 110 92 133 125 12 90 101 110 92 133 125 128 13 101 110 92 133 125 128 152 14 110 92 133 125 128 152 143 15 92 133 125 128 152 143 166 16 133 125 128 152 143 166 167 17 125 128 152 143 166 167 165 18 128 152 143 166 167 165 169 19 152 143 166 167 165 169 173 Given the fact that multilayer neural networks with only one hidden layer and a sigmoidal activation function can perform any nonlinear mapping between two finite-dimensional spaces with a given accuracy, we will determine a suffi- cient number of hidden neurons [35]. At the same time, we note that in the on-line mode, during the sequential manufacture of each detail, the training sample size increases by one example. Thus, when training MLP models to obtain a forecaster estimate of the controlled indicator of detail No. 25 from implementation No. 2 (Table 1), the training sample size will be equal to 371819 K . Using the values of nK , , and m , we will determine the minimum minL and maximum maxL number of neurons in the hidden layer based on the dependencies presented in [36] .2)(5.0,2 maxmin KmnLmnL  (2) In accordance with dependencies (2), the total number of neurons in the hid- den layer was calculated as the arithmetic mean between 9.4(min) L and 7.15(max) L . Thus, computational experiments are performed using MLP models with a 6:10:1 architecture and sigmoidal neuronal activation functions. To verify the obtained results of neural network forecasting, the following statistical criteria are used: mean absolute percentage error MAPE (3); root mean square error RMSE (4); minimum and maximum relative approximation error  (5); coefficient of determination )6(D ; correlation coefficient )7(R ; variance ratio )8(S :     n i i ii y yy N MAPE 1 out 100 , (3) where yout, y are respectively the forecasted and actual values of the i-th example, ni ,,1 , 19N ; S.S. Fedin, O.O. Romaniuk, R.M. Trishch ISSN 1681–6048 System Research & Information Technologies, 2025, № 3 120 N yy RMSE N i ii    1 2out )( ; (4) 100δ ,100δ min max max min  y RMSE y RMSE ; (5)                                               2 1 out 1 2out 2 11 2 2 1 1 1 outout )( N i i N i i N i i N i i N i N i N i iiii yyNyyN yyyyN D ; (6) DR  ; (7) y S σ σ , (8)  – standard deviation of the forecast error; )( outyy  – forecast error; yσ – standard deviation of the forecasted indicator. CONDUCTING COMPUTATIONAL EXPERIMENTS USING NEURAL NETWORK MODELING METHODS When creating MLP models, we used STATISTICA 10, a system for statistical data analysis and forecasting, as well as BrainMaker Professional 3.52, a system for modeling neural networks. The use of different software during computational experiments is due to the need to ensure the reproducibility of the forecasting re- sults. To ensure the convergence of the forecasting results and their verification assessment, two series of computational experiments were performed in STATISTICA and BrainMaker Professional. Thus, the training of neural network models was repeated twice for each sequentially manufactured detail from im- plementation No. 2 (Table 3). In this case, the BFGS (Broyden-Fletcher- Goldfarb-Shanno) algorithm was used in the STATISTICA system, and the Back Propagation of Error algorithm was used in the BrainMaker Professional system. It should be noted that these machine learning algorithms are iterative gradient methods of numerical optimization designed to find local extrema of a nonlinear transformation function by minimizing the MLP error and obtaining the desired output — y. Using the BFGS algorithm in the Automated Neural Networks module of the STATISTICA 10 system, one neural network model out of 50 MLP models was automatically selected for each detail from implementation No. 2 according to the criterion of minimum training and testing error. An example of the interface of the created forecasted MLP-model for the first forecasted example (Table 3), i.e. the 7th detail from realisation No. 2 (Table 1) in the STATISTICA system is shown in Fig. 1. When using the Back Propagation of Error algorithm in the BrainMaker sys- tem, the accuracy tolerance parameter for training neural network models was set to 1.0TOL  . Analysis of the results of training the MLP model at the number of Forecasting the quality of technological processes by methods of artificial neural networks Системні дослідження та інформаційні технології, 2025, № 3 121 epochs 163Run  for the 7th detail from implementation No. 2 (Table 1) and the value of 070.0RMS indicates high accuracy of neural network training (Fig. 2). An example of the interface of the trained and tested MLP model for the 7th detail from implementation No. 2, which shows the absence of unrecog- nized facts (Bad=0) in the BrainMaker system, is shown in Fig. 3. To forecast the controlled parameter of the machining process of the 8th detail from implementation No. 2, the MLP model was trained using sample examples (Ta- ble 2) with the first fact from Table 3 added to it. Using this fact in the training sample allows us to implement the principle of simulation of the neurocontroller's function- ing and continue the process of training the neural network model on-line. Thus, by the method of sequentially adding facts to the training set, 19 MLP models with a 6:10:1 architecture were created in two series of computational ex- periments using the gradient learning algorithms BFGS and Back Propagation of Fig. 1. Interface of the MLP model with 6:10:1 architecture created in STATISTICA 10 for the 7th detail of implementation No. 2 Fig. 2. Graph of changes in the RMS Error of training the MLP model in BrainMaker Professional 3.52 for the 7th detail from implementation No. 2 of the first series of com- putational experiments S.S. Fedin, O.O. Romaniuk, R.M. Trishch ISSN 1681–6048 System Research & Information Technologies, 2025, № 3 122 Error for all — from the 7th to the 25th consecutively manufactured details from implementation No. 2 (Table 3). RESULTS OF COMPUTATIONAL EXPERIMENTS The results of forecasting the value of the controlled parameter for the 7th detail from implementation No. 2, obtained MLP models trained in two series of computational experiments using the BFGS algorithm are shown in Fig. 4 and Fig. 5, respectively. The results of the forecasting in two series of computational experiments us- ing the Back Propagation of Error algorithm for the 7th detail from implementa- tion No. 2 are shown in Fig. 6 and Fig. 7, respectively. Fig. 3. The interface of the MLP model with 6:10:1 architecture created in BrainMaker Professional 3.52 for the 7th detail of the implementation No. 2 of the first series of com- putational experiments Fig. 5 The result of forecasting the controlled parameter of the 7th detail from implementation No. 2, obtained in STATISTICA 10 for the second series of computational experiments Fig. 4. The result of forecasting the controlled parameter of the 7th detail from implementa- tion No. 2, obtained in STATISTICA 10 for the first series of computational experiments Forecasting the quality of technological processes by methods of artificial neural networks Системні дослідження та інформаційні технології, 2025, № 3 123 The obtained forecaster estimates of the deviation of the controlled size of shaft type details 50h11 from the nominal value for all sequentially manufac- tured details from the 7th to the 25th in two series of computational experiments conducted using MLP models with 6:10:1 architecture and trained by BFGS and Back Propagation of Error algorithms are shown in Table 4. T a b l e 4 . The results of forecasting the controlled size of details of the type shaft 50h11 from the nominal value of yout, μm Algorithm BFGS Algorithm Back Propagation of Error Example number Series 1 Series 2 Series 1 Series 2 1 70 69 71 74 2 80 83 79 77 3 84 90 81 87 4 88 90 88 88 5 103 102 104 101 6 92 86 98 96 7 100 103 99 108 8 121 118 115 111 9 96 103 109 109 10 133 123 128 121 11 145 151 125 128 12 112 118 126 129 13 152 152 155 158 14 168 172 146 145 15 166 166 172 172 16 180 183 173 173 17 168 173 172 169 18 173 174 179 175 19 173 179 177 176 Fig. 6. The result of forecasting the controlled parameter of the 7th detail from imple- mentation No. 2, obtained in BrainMaker Professional 3.52 for the first series of compu- tational experiments Fig. 7. The result of forecasting the controlled parameter of the 7th detail from imple- mentation No. 2, obtained in BrainMaker Professional 3.52 for the second series of com- putational experiments S.S. Fedin, O.O. Romaniuk, R.M. Trishch ISSN 1681–6048 System Research & Information Technologies, 2025, № 3 124 DISCUSSION OF THE OBTAINED RESULTS The reproducibility of the obtained forecasting results is confirmed by testing the statistical hypothesis that there is no significant difference between the forecast- ing results using different machine learning algorithms for two series of experi- ments (Table 4), which was performed on the basis of a t-test for independent var- iables, since the condition 05.0p is met (Fig. 8). The convergence of the two series of neural network forecasting results based on the machine learning algorithms BFGS and Back Propagation of Error (Table 4) is confirmed by the significant pairwise correlation coefficients 993.0BFGS R and 995.0nPropagatioBack R , respectively. Verification of the obtained results of neural network forecasting of the ac- curacy of the technological process of details machining was carried out using statistical criteria (3)–(8) (Table 5). T a b l e 5 . Estimates of statistical criteria for forecast verification Criterion Algorithm MAPE, % RMSE, μm min, % max, % R D S Series 1 5.322 9.668 5.589 13.617 0.969 0.939 0.282 BFGS Series 2 6.494 11.180 6.463 15.747 0.964 0.929 0.314 Series 1 4.767 6.886 3.981 9.699 0.984 0.969 0.198 Back Propagation of Error Series 2 5.051 6.856 3.963 9.656 0.983 0.966 0.197 Based on the values of the coefficient of determination D (Table 5), we cal- culated the correlation coefficients (7), the value of which allowed us to classify all the results obtained by R (Table 5) as “Strong” – a qualitative measure of sta- tistical relationship according to the Chaddock scale (Table 6). T a b l e 6 . Correlation between quantitative and qualitative estimates of the correlation coefficient according to the Chaddock scale [37] Quantitative measure statistical connection Qualitative measure statistical connection 0<R<0.1 None 0.1<R<0.3 Weak 0.3 <R<0.5 Moderate 0.5<R<0.7 Noticeable 0.7<R<0.9 Close 0.9<R<0.99 Strong 0.99<R<1 Functional Fig. 8. Screenshot of the result of testing the statistical hypothesis that there is no signifi- cant difference between the forecasting results for two series of experiments in STATISTICA 10 Forecasting the quality of technological processes by methods of artificial neural networks Системні дослідження та інформаційні технології, 2025, № 3 125 Thus, the analysis of the values of all statistical criteria (Table 5) allows us to recommend the use of the Back Propagation of Error algorithm when creating neural network models to forecast the quality of machining processes for details by the parameter of shaft diameter deviation from the nominal value. It should be noted that since the proposed methods of neural network forecasting are based on the use of machine learning algorithms that allow finding local minima in the nonlinear mapping YX  , the prospect of further research may be the joint ap- plication of neural network methods and evolutionary modelling, which include genetic algorithms [38; 40]. CONCLUSIONS 1. To obtain an operational forecasting of the quality of mechanical engi- neering technological processes by the parameter of accuracy of machining of shaft-type details, MLP neural network models with the BFGS and Back Propaga- tion of Error training algorithms were developed using STATISTICA 10 and BrainMaker Professional 3.52 systems, respectively. 2. As a result of two series of computational experiments, it was found that the use of the Back Propagation of Error algorithm allows to obtain forecasted estimates of the controlled process parameter with significantly smaller ranges of the mean absolute percentage error, mean square error, relative approximation error and variance ratio criterion compared to the BFGS algorithm. At the same time, sufficiently large values of the coefficient of determination and significant estimates of the correlation coefficient were obtained for both algorithms. 3. It has been established that the use of the developed adaptive MLP-models with the Back Propagation of Error algorithm allows to obtain forecasted estima- tions of accuracy indicators of technological processes of shaft-type details ma- chining with 90-96 % reliability, which is confirmed by the range of values of relative approximation error (5). Thus, the created MLP-models can be recom- mended for application in neurocontrollers or neuroemulators for formation of control actions and prevention of discrepancies of parameters of details at control of accuracy of process of their machining in a mode on-line. REFERENCES 1. Product quality. Quality assessment. Terms and definitions: DSTU 2925-94. [In force since 1996-01-01]. K.: Gosstandart of Ukraine,1995, 32 с. 2. O. Cherniak, R. Trishch, R. Ginevičius, O. Nechuiviter, V. Burdeina, “Methodology for Assessing the Processes of the Occupational Safety Management System Using Func- tional Dependencies,” Integrated Computer Technologies in Mechanical Engineering – 2023, ICTM 2023. Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems, vol. 996, Springer, Cham, 2024, pp. 3–13. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-60549-9_1 3. R. Trishch, O. Cherniak, D. Zdenek, V. Petraskevicius, “Assessment of the occupational health and safety manage-ment system by qualimetric methods,” Engineering Management in Production and Services, vol. 16, no. 2, pp. 118–127, 2024. doi: 10.2478/emj-2024-0017 4. E. Khomiak, R. Trishch, O. Zabolotnyi, O. Cherniak, L. Lutai, O. Katrich, “Automated Mode of Improvement of the Quality Control System for Nuclear Reactor Fuel Element Shell Tightness,” Information Technology for Education, Science, and Technics. Lecture Notes on Data Engineering and Communications Technologies, ITEST 2024, vol. 1, pp. 79–91, Springer, Cham. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-71801-4_7 5. P. Hovorov, A. Kindinova, R. Trishch, E. Khomiak, O. Cherniak, O. Katrych, “Manage- ment of Power Grid Modes in Conditions of High Heterogeneity,” 2024 IEEE 5th KhPI Week on Advanced Technology (KhPIWeek), Kharkiv, Ukraine, 2024. doi: 10.1109/KhPIWeek61434.2024.10878032 S.S. Fedin, O.O. Romaniuk, R.M. Trishch ISSN 1681–6048 System Research & Information Technologies, 2025, № 3 126 6. P. Hovorov, R. Trishch, V. Hovorov, E. Khomiak, O. Vasilevskyi, V. Kukharchuk, “Pe- culiarities of Voltage Quality Control in Power Supply and Lighting Systems of Cities,” 2024 IEEE 5th KhPI Week on Advanced Technology (KhPIWeek), Kharkiv, Ukraine, 2024. doi: 10.1109/KhPIWeek61434.2024.10877979 7. P. Hovorov, V. Hovorov, M. Khvorost, A. Kindinova, R. Trishch, “Comprehensive Solu- tion of Issues of Voltage Regulation and Compensation of Reactive Power in Power Supply and Lighting Systems of Cities,” 2024 IEEE 5th KhPI Week on Advanced Technology (KhPIWeek), Kharkiv, Ukraine, 2024. doi: 10.1109/ KhPI- Week61434.2024.10877952 8. P. Hovorov, R. Trishch, R. Ginevičius, V. Petraškevičius, K. Šuhajda, “Assessment of Risks of Voltage Quality Decline in Load Nodes of Power Systems,” Energies, 18(7), 1579, 2025. doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/en18071579 9. E. Khomiak, R. Trishch, J. Nazarko, M. Novotný, V. Petraškevičius, “Method of Quality Control of Nuclear Reactor Element Tightness to Improve Environmental Safety,” Ener- gies, 18(9), 2172, 2025. doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/en18092172 10. S.M. Belyi, “Influence of cutting modes on the accuracy and surface roughness during turning,” Collection of scientific papers of Khmelnytsky National University. Series: Technical sciences, no. 4, pp. 28–34, 2023. 11. E.V. Shvetsov, I.Y. Kharchenko, “Ensuring the accuracy of holes during cutting,” Bulle- tin of the Donbass State Machine-Building Academy, no. 1(65), pp. 92–97, 2021. 12. Statistical methods of quality control and regulation. Terms and definitions: DSTU 3514- 97. [Effective from 1997-07-01]. K.: Gosstandart of Ukraine, 1997, 48 p. 13. I.I. Plaskin, Optimization of technical solutions in mechanical engineering. M.: Mashi- nostroenie, 1982, 176 p. 14. Y.V. Shramko, O.S. Volkov, “Analysis of the influence of workpiece installation errors on the accuracy of machining details,” Bulletin of Mechanical Engineering and Trans- port, no. 2(26), pp. 55–60, 2022. 15. S.S. Fedin, N.A. Zubretska, Evaluation and forecasting of industrial products quality using adaptive artificial intelligence systems: monograph. K.: Interservice, 2012, 206 p. 16. A.A. Yudashkin, Application of neural networks for the construction of adaptive control sys- tems for technological processes: Candidate of Technical Sciences (PhD): 05.13.07. Samara State Technical University (SSTU). Samara, 1994, 145 p. 17. Roheen Qamar, Baqar Ali Zardari, “Artificial Neural Networks: An Overview,” Mesopotamian Journal of Computer Science, vol. (2023), pp. 124–133, 2023. doi: https://doi.org/ 10.58496/MJCSC/2023/015 18. F. Fan, J. Xiong, M. Li, G. Wang, “On interpretability of artificial neural networks: A survey,” IEEE Transactions on Radiation and Plasma Medical Sciences, vol. 5, no. 6, pp. 741–760, 2021. doi: 10.1109/TRPMS.2021.3066428 19. K.J. Hunt, D. Sbarbaro, R. Zbikowski, P.J. Gawthrop, “Neural networks for control sys- tems - a survey,” Automatica, vol. 28, issue 6, pp. 1083–1112, 1992. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/0005-1098(92)90053-I 20. Adaptive control of machine tools; Edited by B.S. Balakshin. M.: Mashinostroenie, 1973, 688 p. 21. S.S. Volosov, Z.Sh. Geyler, Product quality management by means of active control. M.: Izdatelstvo standardov, 1989, 264 p. 22. M.S. Nevelson, Automatic control of machining accuracy on metal-cutting machines. L.: Mashinostroenie, 1982, 184 p. 23. S.V. Bilenko, Increasing the efficiency of high-speed machining on the basis of ap- proaches of nonlinear dynamics and neural network modeling: Dis....dr.tekhn.sci: 05.03.01. K.-on-A., 2006, 331 p. 24. A.P. Nikishechkin, Improving the quality of the adaptation process when changing tech- nological parameters using a neural network apparatus: Candidate of Technical Sci- ences: 05.13.06. M.: Stankin, 2002, 187 p. 25. P.D. Wasserman, Neural Computing: Theory and Practice. New York, NY: Van Nostrand Reinhold, 1989, 189 p. 26. N.A. Zubretskaya, S.S. Fedin, “Neural network forecasting of the accuracy of techno- logical processes by the quality parameters of manufactured products,” Information Processing Systems, issue 2, pp. 17–20, 2014. 27. S.S. Fedin, R.M. Trishch, “Quality management using neural network methods,” System management methods, technology and organization of production, repair and operation of cars, issue 15, pp. 228–230. K.: NTU, TAU, 2003. Forecasting the quality of technological processes by methods of artificial neural networks Системні дослідження та інформаційні технології, 2025, № 3 127 28. Hojin Cho et al., “MMP Net: A feedforward neural network model with sequential inputs for representing continuous multistage manufacturing processes without intermediate outputs,” IISE Transactions, 56(10), pp. 1058–1069, 2023. doi: https://doi.org/ 10.1080/24725854.2023.2242434 29. Izabela Rojek, “Technological process planning by the use of neural networks,” Artificial Intelligence for Engineering Design, Analysis and Manufacturing, 31 (1), pp. 1–15, 2017. doi: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0890060416000147 30. Huang Jin, Jiang Pin Yu, Zhao Rujia, Shen Bing, “An approach to neural index models for scheduling based on the example of machining processes,” J. Xi’an Jiaotong Univ., 1996, pp. 12–18. 31. Wang Chaojun, Liu Yanming, “Milling optimization controller combining genetic algo- rithm and neural networks,” Contr. Theory and Appl., vol. 16, no. 4, pp. 607–610, 1999. 32. Yang Zheyong, Zhang Da-wei, Yuang Tian, “Milling process control using a three-layer back-propagation neural network,” J. Tianjin Univ. Sci. and Technol., 2000, pp. 206–210. 33. S.S. Fedin, Artificial Intelligence Systems and Data Analysis Technologies: Workshop; 2nd ed. K.: Interservice, 2021, 848 с. 34. A.A. Matalin, Technology of mechanical engineering. L.: Mashinostroenie, 1985, 496 p. 35. S. Omatu, Neurocontrol and its applications; Book 2. M.: IPRZHR, 2000, 272 p. 36. I.S. Astakhova, A.S. Potapov, V.A. Chulyukov, Artificial Intelligence Systems. A practi- cal course: a textbook. M.: Binom, Laboratory of Knowledge, 2008, 276 p. 37. Ugur Turan, “A Correlation Coefficients Analysis on Innovative Sustainable Develop- ment Groups,” EUREKA: Social and Humanities, 1(1), pp. 46–55, 2020. doi: https://doi.org/10.21303/2504-5571.2020.001130 38. D. Whitley, T. Starkweather, C. Bogart, “Genetic algorithms and neural networks: Opti- mizing connections and connectivity,” Parallel Computing, vol. 14, issue 3, pp. 347–361, 1990. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-8191(90)90086-O 39. Z. Guo, R.E. Uhrig, “Use of genetic algorithms to select inputs for neural network,” Pro- ceedings of International Workshop on Combinations of Genetic Algorithms and Neural Networks, COGAN-92, 1992, pp. 223–234. 40. S.S. Fedin, “Improving the accuracy of neural network exchange rate forecasting using evolutionary modeling methods,” System Research and Information Technologies, no. 3, pp. 7–24, 2024. doi: https://doi.org/10.20535/SRIT.2308-8893.2024.3.01 Received 07.05.2025 INFORMATION ON THE ARTICLE Serhii S. Fedin, ORCID: 0000-0001-9732-632X, National Transport University, Ukraine, e-mail: sergey.fedin1975@gmail.com Oksana O. Romaniuk, ORCID: 0000-0001-9774-9875, Open International University of Human Development “Ukraine”, Ukraine, e-mail: knutdromanuk@gmail.com Roman M. Trishch, ORCID: 0000-0002-9503-8428, Ukraine National Aerospace Uni- versity “Kharkiv Aviation Institute”, Ukraine, e-mail: trich_@ukr.net ПРОГНОЗУВАННЯ ЯКОСТІ ТЕХНОЛОГІЧНИХ ПРОЦЕСІВ МЕТОДАМИ ШТУЧНИХ НЕЙРОННИХ МЕРЕЖ / С.С. Федін, О.О. Романюк, Р.М. Тріщ Анотація. Створено комплекс моделей прямошарових нейронних мереж для отримання оперативних прогнозів якості технологічних процесів машинобу- дування. Установлено, що використання алгоритму машинного навчання Back Propagation of Error дає змогу отримати прогнозні оцінки контрольованого па- раметра процесу металообробки зі значно меншими діапазонами середньої аб- солютної відсоткової похибки, середньої квадратичної похибки, відносної по- хибки апроксимації та критерію дисперсійного відношення порівняно з алгоритмом BFGS. Показано, що запропоновані моделі нейронних мереж типу MLP можуть бути рекомендовані для практичного застосування під час управ- ління точністю процесу механічної обробки деталей типу вал. Ключові слова: деталі, машинне навчання, нейронна мережа, прогнозування, технологічний процес, точність, якість.
id journaliasakpiua-article-343080
institution System research and information technologies
keywords_txt_mv keywords
language English
last_indexed 2025-11-09T02:11:03Z
publishDate 2025
publisher The National Technical University of Ukraine &quot;Igor Sikorsky Kyiv Polytechnic Institute&quot;
record_format ojs
resource_txt_mv journaliasakpiua/ad/bf9c41af822518c0684c5f2a1eba42ad.pdf
spelling journaliasakpiua-article-3430802025-11-09T00:01:30Z Forecasting the quality of technological processes by methods of artificial neural networks Прогнозування якості технологічних процесів методами штучних нейронних мереж Fedin, Serhii Romaniuk, Oksana Trishch, Roman деталі машинне навчання нейронна мережа прогнозування технологічний процес точність якість accuracy details quality forecasting machine learning neural network technological process A set of models of feed-forward neural networks has been created to obtain operational forecasts of the quality of mechanical engineering processes. It is established that the use of the Back Propagation of Error machine learning algorithm allows for obtaining forecasted estimates for the controlled parameter of the metalworking process with significantly smaller ranges of the mean absolute percentage error, mean square error, relative approximation error, and variance ratio criterion compared to the BFGS algorithm. It is shown that the proposed MLP neural network models can be recommended for practical applications in controlling the accuracy of the machining process of shaft-type parts. Створено комплекс моделей прямошарових нейронних мереж для отримання оперативних прогнозів якості технологічних процесів машинобудування. Установлено, що використання алгоритму машинного навчання Back Propagation of Error дає змогу отримати прогнозні оцінки контрольованого параметра процесу металообробки зі значно меншими діапазонами середньої абсолютної відсоткової похибки, середньої квадратичної похибки, відносної похибки апроксимації та критерію дисперсійного відношення порівняно з алгоритмом BFGS. Показано, що запропоновані моделі нейронних мереж типу MLP можуть бути рекомендовані для практичного застосування під час управління точністю процесу механічної обробки деталей типу вал. The National Technical University of Ukraine &quot;Igor Sikorsky Kyiv Polytechnic Institute&quot; 2025-09-29 Article Article application/pdf https://journal.iasa.kpi.ua/article/view/343080 10.20535/SRIT.2308-8893.2025.3.09 System research and information technologies; No. 3 (2025); 113-127 Системные исследования и информационные технологии; № 3 (2025); 113-127 Системні дослідження та інформаційні технології; № 3 (2025); 113-127 2308-8893 1681-6048 en https://journal.iasa.kpi.ua/article/view/343080/331016
spellingShingle деталі
машинне навчання
нейронна мережа
прогнозування
технологічний процес
точність
якість
Fedin, Serhii
Romaniuk, Oksana
Trishch, Roman
Прогнозування якості технологічних процесів методами штучних нейронних мереж
title Прогнозування якості технологічних процесів методами штучних нейронних мереж
title_alt Forecasting the quality of technological processes by methods of artificial neural networks
title_full Прогнозування якості технологічних процесів методами штучних нейронних мереж
title_fullStr Прогнозування якості технологічних процесів методами штучних нейронних мереж
title_full_unstemmed Прогнозування якості технологічних процесів методами штучних нейронних мереж
title_short Прогнозування якості технологічних процесів методами штучних нейронних мереж
title_sort прогнозування якості технологічних процесів методами штучних нейронних мереж
topic деталі
машинне навчання
нейронна мережа
прогнозування
технологічний процес
точність
якість
topic_facet деталі
машинне навчання
нейронна мережа
прогнозування
технологічний процес
точність
якість
accuracy
details
quality
forecasting
machine learning
neural network
technological process
url https://journal.iasa.kpi.ua/article/view/343080
work_keys_str_mv AT fedinserhii forecastingthequalityoftechnologicalprocessesbymethodsofartificialneuralnetworks
AT romaniukoksana forecastingthequalityoftechnologicalprocessesbymethodsofartificialneuralnetworks
AT trishchroman forecastingthequalityoftechnologicalprocessesbymethodsofartificialneuralnetworks
AT fedinserhii prognozuvannââkostítehnologíčnihprocesívmetodamištučnihnejronnihmerež
AT romaniukoksana prognozuvannââkostítehnologíčnihprocesívmetodamištučnihnejronnihmerež
AT trishchroman prognozuvannââkostítehnologíčnihprocesívmetodamištučnihnejronnihmerež