Problems of magnetostratigraphy of Pleistocene loess-soil deposits of the South of Ukraine

Main principles of magnetostratigraphy, paleomagnetic method of measurement and its applying in Quaternary stratigraphy have been set forth. Results of Matuyama-Brunhes (M/B) boundary detection in loess-soil sediments of Ukraine and other territories given in the previous studies are presented. Atte...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Datum:2016
Hauptverfasser: Bakhmutov, V.G., Glavatskiy, D. V.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:Russisch
Veröffentlicht: S. Subbotin Institute of Geophysics of the NAS of Ukraine 2016
Schlagworte:
Online Zugang:https://journals.uran.ua/geofizicheskiy/article/view/107801
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Назва журналу:Geofizicheskiy Zhurnal

Institution

Geofizicheskiy Zhurnal
_version_ 1856543108179689472
author Bakhmutov, V.G.
Glavatskiy, D. V.
author_facet Bakhmutov, V.G.
Glavatskiy, D. V.
author_sort Bakhmutov, V.G.
baseUrl_str
collection OJS
datestamp_date 2020-10-07T11:20:03Z
description Main principles of magnetostratigraphy, paleomagnetic method of measurement and its applying in Quaternary stratigraphy have been set forth. Results of Matuyama-Brunhes (M/B) boundary detection in loess-soil sediments of Ukraine and other territories given in the previous studies are presented. Attention has been paid to contradictions in determination of M/B boundary position and episodes of inverse polarity within Brunhes chron according to the data of different authors. The situation is notably shown on Roxolany section in West Black Sea region as an example. One of the reasons there can be increase of magnetometric equipment precision and quality of measurements which exclude the bias effects nowadays. Another reason is the contradictions in stratigraphic partition of sections that are located even within the same loess province. We have got informative data that allow to predetermine M/B boundary position in Roxolany section at 46.6 m depth between Lubny and Martonosha soil horizons which conforms to modern point of view of Ukrainian stratigraphers and corresponds to previous investigations of Dolynske section (M/B boundary was found at the level of Martonosha horizon). Further complex paleomagnetic studies of Pleistocene sections of Ukraine will help to revise and correlate still conflicting magnetostratigraphic charts.
first_indexed 2025-07-17T11:04:31Z
format Article
id journalsuranua-geofizicheskiy-article-107801
institution Geofizicheskiy Zhurnal
language Russian
last_indexed 2025-07-17T11:04:31Z
publishDate 2016
publisher S. Subbotin Institute of Geophysics of the NAS of Ukraine
record_format ojs
spelling journalsuranua-geofizicheskiy-article-1078012020-10-07T11:20:03Z Problems of magnetostratigraphy of Pleistocene loess-soil deposits of the South of Ukraine Bakhmutov, V.G. Glavatskiy, D. V. magnetostratigraphy Matuyama-Brunhes boundary palaeomagnetic method Pleistocene loess-soil sequence Roxolany section Main principles of magnetostratigraphy, paleomagnetic method of measurement and its applying in Quaternary stratigraphy have been set forth. Results of Matuyama-Brunhes (M/B) boundary detection in loess-soil sediments of Ukraine and other territories given in the previous studies are presented. Attention has been paid to contradictions in determination of M/B boundary position and episodes of inverse polarity within Brunhes chron according to the data of different authors. The situation is notably shown on Roxolany section in West Black Sea region as an example. One of the reasons there can be increase of magnetometric equipment precision and quality of measurements which exclude the bias effects nowadays. Another reason is the contradictions in stratigraphic partition of sections that are located even within the same loess province. We have got informative data that allow to predetermine M/B boundary position in Roxolany section at 46.6 m depth between Lubny and Martonosha soil horizons which conforms to modern point of view of Ukrainian stratigraphers and corresponds to previous investigations of Dolynske section (M/B boundary was found at the level of Martonosha horizon). Further complex paleomagnetic studies of Pleistocene sections of Ukraine will help to revise and correlate still conflicting magnetostratigraphic charts. S. Subbotin Institute of Geophysics of the NAS of Ukraine 2016-07-15 Article Article application/pdf https://journals.uran.ua/geofizicheskiy/article/view/107801 10.24028/gzh.0203-3100.v38i4.2016.107801 Geofizicheskiy Zhurnal; Vol. 38 No. 4 (2016); 59-74 Геофизический журнал; Том 38 № 4 (2016); 59-74 Геофізичний журнал; Том 38 № 4 (2016); 59-74 2524-1052 0203-3100 ru https://journals.uran.ua/geofizicheskiy/article/view/107801/102874 Copyright (c) 2020 Geofizicheskiy Zhurnal https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
spellingShingle magnetostratigraphy
Matuyama-Brunhes boundary
palaeomagnetic method
Pleistocene
loess-soil sequence
Roxolany section
Bakhmutov, V.G.
Glavatskiy, D. V.
Problems of magnetostratigraphy of Pleistocene loess-soil deposits of the South of Ukraine
title Problems of magnetostratigraphy of Pleistocene loess-soil deposits of the South of Ukraine
title_full Problems of magnetostratigraphy of Pleistocene loess-soil deposits of the South of Ukraine
title_fullStr Problems of magnetostratigraphy of Pleistocene loess-soil deposits of the South of Ukraine
title_full_unstemmed Problems of magnetostratigraphy of Pleistocene loess-soil deposits of the South of Ukraine
title_short Problems of magnetostratigraphy of Pleistocene loess-soil deposits of the South of Ukraine
title_sort problems of magnetostratigraphy of pleistocene loess-soil deposits of the south of ukraine
topic magnetostratigraphy
Matuyama-Brunhes boundary
palaeomagnetic method
Pleistocene
loess-soil sequence
Roxolany section
topic_facet magnetostratigraphy
Matuyama-Brunhes boundary
palaeomagnetic method
Pleistocene
loess-soil sequence
Roxolany section
url https://journals.uran.ua/geofizicheskiy/article/view/107801
work_keys_str_mv AT bakhmutovvg problemsofmagnetostratigraphyofpleistoceneloesssoildepositsofthesouthofukraine
AT glavatskiydv problemsofmagnetostratigraphyofpleistoceneloesssoildepositsofthesouthofukraine