Natural and technogenic components of megalopolis magnetic field

Magnetic storm influence becomes more and more interesting for people. In this article we describe measurable magnetic field data from different megalopolis regions and from the underground passenger transport by the Kyiv city example. There were five observation points evenly situated among the cit...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Геофизический журнал
Date:2016
Main Authors: Orlyuk, M., Romenets, A., Orliuk, I.
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Інститут геофізики ім. С.I. Субботіна НАН України 2016
Subjects:
Online Access:https://nasplib.isofts.kiev.ua/handle/123456789/103752
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Journal Title:Digital Library of Periodicals of National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine
Cite this:Natural and technogenic components of megalopolis magnetic field / M. Orlyuk, A. Romenets, I. Orliuk // Геофизический журнал. — 2016. — Т. 38, № 1. — С. 78-85. — Бібліогр.: 21 назв. — англ.

Institution

Digital Library of Periodicals of National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine
_version_ 1860226345353609216
author Orlyuk, M.
Romenets, A.
Orliuk, I.
author_facet Orlyuk, M.
Romenets, A.
Orliuk, I.
citation_txt Natural and technogenic components of megalopolis magnetic field / M. Orlyuk, A. Romenets, I. Orliuk // Геофизический журнал. — 2016. — Т. 38, № 1. — С. 78-85. — Бібліогр.: 21 назв. — англ.
collection DSpace DC
container_title Геофизический журнал
description Magnetic storm influence becomes more and more interesting for people. In this article we describe measurable magnetic field data from different megalopolis regions and from the underground passenger transport by the Kyiv city example. There were five observation points evenly situated among the city, and one metro route with direct and reverse direction movement. Collected information shows general situation with magnetic noise in populous cities. Smart- phones are very popular today so we have used one of them as a budget magnetometer in our research. Вплив магнітних бур на людину стає останнім часом все цікавішим. У статті викладено результати досліджень змінного магнітного поля техногенного походження в різних районах мегаполісу і підземному транспорті на прикладі м. Київ. Виміри проведені в п'яти пунктах у різних районах міста, а також у метро в обох напрямках руху поїзда. Отримана інформація показує загальну ситуацію з магнітним шумом у густонаселених містах. Як бюджетний варіант для вимірювань в метро використаний смартфон з вбудованим магнітометром.
first_indexed 2025-12-07T18:20:07Z
format Article
fulltext M. ORLYUK, A. ROMENETS, I. ORLIUK �� ����� � ���� ������������������������ �������� ������ Natural and technogenic components of megalopolis magnetic field ©©©©© M. Orlyuk, A. Romenets, I. Orliuk, 2016 Institute of Geophysics, National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine, Kiev, Ukraine Received November 5, 2015 Presented by the Editorial Board Member V. I. Starostenko ���������������������������������� ��������!�� ����"�#�$���%���������������$���"� �"&��'������ ����("�'�&���� � �������� � �� �)��"�� �"�� � �� � �("��)�����&������* + �����"��� ����������&"�� ��������� ����������$����������,��� �������� �"�"������-)�� ���$��������&������+ ���������.�����$ (����"�� ��� � ������)�$��������� ,&����/������� ��0 ���#�)�� $�&���&����'��������#���&�����������%�� �������� ���"�"������������1$ ���("���+�����������)����������'����"�� ���$ �������+������0 ��&����� �����������* � �"�� �� ������� ���������� ��"��" �������"�� �".��"�� �"��"��������"�� �".���������+�%��� Introduction. At the present time there are a lot of data about the influence of constant and wide frequency range magnetic field variations on live or- ganisms and human activity [Travkin, 1971; ICNIRP ..., 1998; Pavlovich et al., 1991; Orlyuk, 2001; Phy- sicical ..., 2003; Khramov et al., 2006; Serpov, 2007; Standart ..., 2008; Belokrinitskiy, 2009; Kulikov, Ti- mofeeva, 2011; Medvedeva et al., 2011; Rozov et al., 2013; Gvishiani et al., 2013 and others]. In large me- galopolises natural Earth’s magnetic field is most- ly complemented by technogenic component from different sources of constant and variable kind [Or- lyuk, Romenets, 2004; Tyagunov, 2011; Romenets, Orliuk, 2013; Orlyuk et al., 2014]. In the minimal he- alth norm of static magnetic field is a half of its back- ground values in the residence territory [Physical ..., 2003]. The authors [Orlyuk, Romenets, 2005] sug- gested the value of its “ecological norm” nearby 35— 55 μT. This article presents calculated and experi- mental data about Kiev and its surrounding area mag- netic field of natural and technogenic origin. 1. Natural Earth’s magnetic field. Spatio- temporal structure of the Earth’s magnetic field in- duction B is the sum of fields from different sources: B = nB + ΔB + δB , where nB — normal (main) field of the Earth, gene- rated by the liquid core processes; ΔB — anoma- lous magnetic field (the lithosphere field), mainly caused by rocks magnetization, δB — external field generated by solar and cosmic radiation actions, the Sun and near-Earth space magnetic fields. Quasi-permanent geomagnetic field, which is the sum of main and lithosphere magnetic fields, sets the geomagnetic background where biosphere pro- cesses run and human lives. Afterwards, map of the magnetic induction module B for Kiev region was de- veloped. Natural geomagnetic field varies within 50 100— 50 860 nT, increasing from southwest to northeast (Fig. 1). Local spatial geomagnetic field inhomogeneity is mainly determined by its lithospheric component that varies within city from – 200 to 500 nT. The right riverside of the city (especially the old town) is mainly located in positive magnetic field areas with an intensity of 50—100 nT. The left ri- verside of the city is located in predominantly neg- ative magnetic field areas (up to – 200 nT). On the left riverside only Rusanivka, Bereznyaky and partly Kharkivskyi, Bortnychi areas are characterized by low positive background near 50 nT. Another feature of the field is grouping of incre- �������� ���� � NATURAL AND TECHNOGENIC COMPONENTS OF MEGALOPOLIS MAGNETIC FIELD ����� � ���� ������������������������ �� ased values in unique ovals, and grouping of low va- lues — in linear zones of the north-west and north- east stretch. An interesting fact is some relation between building overgrowth and nature of the geo- magnetic field [Orlyuk, Romenets, 2004; Rezinki- na et al., 2009]. 2. Technogenic magnetic field. Variable magnetic (electromagnetic) field of natural and tech- nogenic origin changes within 10�6 Hz — 10 GHz (Fig. 2, a). Low frequency electric and magnetic alternating fields (“electrosmog”). This type of electromagnetic pollution is caused by home mains supply systems and by connected to them devices, by switches and lights, by high voltage lines, transformer stations and traction power. Fig. 1. Kiev map of scalar magnetic field B (for Epoch 2013): 1 — isolines of induction B, 2 — metro route, 3 — metro stations observed, 4 — observation points, 5 — regions of Kiev. M. ORLYUK, A. ROMENETS, I. ORLIUK �� ����� � ���� ������������������������ High frequency radiation from 27 MHz to 10 GHz (Fig. 2, b), a range comprising frequencies from ra- dio and TV (digital as well as analogue), TETRA (di- gital public safety networks), amateur radio, citizens band radio, microwave radio relay, mobile radio (GSM, GPRS,UMTS,LTE, CDMA, 3G, 4G), radar, DECT cord- less telephones, Wi-Fi, WLAN, microwave ovens, WiMAX, and many more (www.gigahertz-solutions.de). The greatest influence on technogenic electro- magnetic noise at low frequencies (0,5 Hz — 400 KHz) is introduced by industrial frequency electric current users [Tyagunov, 2011, 2012]. Otherwise, techno- genic sources at frequencies of 10�6 — 1 Hz are the least explored and we explore it in our research. The magnetic field at these frequencies may be associated with moving of ferromagnetic and elect- rical sources (cars, trams, trolleys, trains, electric trains and subway etc.), and some industrial proces- ses which use DC equipment, etc. Trolley movement (motors turning on and off) ca- uses a change of the magnetic field with an ampli- tude of about 80 nT at about 10 m distance from the road; 50—100 nT, caused by small magnetic mass- es movement (cars, vans, etc.); maximum amplitu- des nearby 300—500 nT are caused by large trucks and urban electric transport [Tyagunov, 2012]. It should be noticed that the anomalous mag- netic field levels presented above are obtained at a distance of 10 m from the roadway and if measure- ments were made inside the vehicles, anomalous magnetic field level would be higher. 3. Equipment used. To study technological components of magnetic field magnetovariational station LEMI-008 was used [Korepanov et al., 1999], and for intensive sources a portable magnetometer built-in smartphone on Android operating system (with special software) was used (Table). For high intensity variations registration, we have experimentally tested our device on the magnetic observatory (Earth’s magnetic field variation) and by high intensity influence on sensor in office. Every ex- periment was duplicated by precision device (LEMI- 008). As a result of experimental measurements it was decided that YAMAHA YAS530 MS-3E high sen- sitivity 3-axis geomagnetic sensor is suitable for re- gistration of high intensity anomalies. Fig. 2. Low frequencies (a) and high frequencies (b). NATURAL AND TECHNOGENIC COMPONENTS OF MEGALOPOLIS MAGNETIC FIELD ����� � ���� ������������������������ �� Results and discussions. Magnetic field va- riations measurements were made in 6 places, al- located more or less evenly within the territory of Ki- ev in industrial and utility rooms on the Palladina ave., Frunze, Harmatna, Bozhenka, Velyka Kiltse- va and Vasyl’kivs’ka streets. The nature of magne- tic field in the subway was also explored. Accord- ing to theoretical and experimental studies, vertical component of the magnetic field Bz is the most sen- sitive to technogenic disturbance, increased valu- es are explained by horizontal form currents from technogenic sources appearance on the Earth’s sur- face [Tyagunov 2011; Romenets, Orliuk, 2013]. Magnetic field variations on observation points (OP) in comparison with geomagnetic observatory “Kiev” variations are shown on the graphs below (Fig.3). OP 1 (Frunze Street 27—29.11.2012). Vertical com- ponent of the magnetic field Bz has a saw-tooth kind of form, it indicates the presence of permanent me- chanical or electromagnetic vibrations caused by the movement of cars and trams. The high-intensity mag- netic field perturbations (300—500 nT) are caused, as it lately turned out, by the interference of slate production and more precisely by DC kilns working (Fig. 3, a). OP 2 (Garmatna street 14—16.12.2012). Signif- icant deviations from the normal level of geomag- netic field in the “Kiev” observatory are observed. Three periods of it are allocated. During the dayti- me, when the B-component has a saw-tooth kind form, we are shown the presence of permanent me- chanical or electromagnetic vibrations. Most like- ly, they are caused by the movement of vehicles and strong traffic on the Peremogy ave. On this basis there are high-intensity (300—400 nT) and high-fre- LEMI-008 fluxgate magnetometer YAMAHA YAS530 MS-3E high sensitivity 3-axis geomagnetic sensor Measurable magnetic field range: Range I — 100 000 nT Range II — 3 200 nT Resolution: Range I — 10 nT Range II — 0.1 nT Bandwidth of analog output DC — 1 Hz Smooth offset ranging band by each axis ± 1000 nT Time of samples averaging, s: 1, 2, 5, 10, 60 Operating temperature range – 5 to + 40 °C Measurable magnetic field range ± 800 μT Magnetic field sensitivity (X, Y) 0.15 μT/count Magnetic field sensitivity (Z) 0.3 μT/count Acquisition time — 1.5 ms Operating temperature range – 40 to + 95 °C quency magnetic field perturbations, previously as- sociated with interference (most likely with on/off pro- cesses) DC converters, heaters, etc. At night, the magnetic field has generally calm nature (Fig. 3, b). OP 3 (Bozhenka street, 09—11.01.2013). Signi- ficant deviations from the normal level of geomag- netic field in the “Kiev” observatory with the ampli- tude of up to ∼ 350 nT are observed. Three periods of magnetic field perturbations are clearly distingu- ished. The graph of the Bz component of magnetic field has a saw-tooth kind sinusoidal form that indi- cates the presence of constant electromagnetic in- terference. Probably they are caused by the work of some equipment at the Paton Electric Welding Institute). The proximity of intensive traffic flows (Bo- zhenka str., Fedorova ave.) makes influence on the overall noise character also. As in previous cases, registered high-intensity 100—150 nT magnetic fi- eld perturbations are associated with the DC con- verters, etc. At night, the magnetic field has gene- rally calm nature (Fig. 3, c). OP 4 (Velyka Kiltseva 1—04.02.2013). Variations of the magnetic field don’t have any clear frequen- cy, so it is suggested that the nature of their occur- rence is random (turning on/off of any appliances, re- pairs, etc.). During all the observation period ape- riodicity single “bursts” of up to 30 nT were regis- tered. By their intensity they are not high and can be caused by reasons mentioned above. In the day- time, there are high-frequency magnetic field per- turbations, but they are minor in intensity (10—15 nT). In general, excepting 2 periods of sporadic distur- bances of magnetic field, one can say that magne- tic field in this observation point is approximately nor- mal (Fig. 3, d). Equipment used M. ORLYUK, A. ROMENETS, I. ORLIUK �� ����� � ���� ������������������������ Fig. 3. Results of measurements in observation point (OP): Frunze Street (a); Garmatna street (b); Bozhenka street (c); Velyka Kiltseva (d); Vasyl’kivs’ka street (e). GO — “Kiev” geomagnetic observatory vertical component Bz variation, OP — observation point vertical component Bz variation. NATURAL AND TECHNOGENIC COMPONENTS OF MEGALOPOLIS MAGNETIC FIELD ����� � ���� ������������������������ �� OP 5 (Vasyl’kivs’ka street, 22—25.02.2013) in the “Kyianka” factory basement. The highest level variations of technogenic origin were fixed at 250— 600 nT. It should be noticed that the abnormal va- lue during 23—24 of February (weekend) is slightly lower than the 22 and 25 of February. Noticed devi- ations of magnetic field level have clear periodicity and it suggests their regular occurrence (most likely it is the effect from the subway). At night, the mag- netic field has a quiet character and is not significant- ly different from the “Kiev” magnetic observatory da- ta. The sawtooth kind high-intensity magnetic field perturbations to 150 nT are also recorded in the day- time and it recognizes the “saturation” of these pe- riods by various magnetic field noises (Fig. 3, e). Magnetic variations registration was conducted on the observation points in November—December 2012 — January—February 2013 for 2-3 days in each of them. As it is shown in Fig. 3, within Kiev mag- netic field is significantly different from the results of magnetic observatory data obtained 45 km from Kiev. By experimental measurement results [Orlyuk, Romenets, 2004; Rozov et al., 2013] at Kiev under- ground metro stations, magnetic field induction chan- ges within 25—40 μT (it is less in 1.5—2 times than on surface). Measurements of geomagnetic field variations in the subway were made on the interval between Beresteyska and Akademmistechko metro stations (Fig. 4). After processing the digital data it can be clearly seen all increased periods of magnetic in- duction. Peaks and periods of magnetic field increasing in the range of 40—350 μT at subway stations are seen on the graph. It is noticed that induction is pri- marily caused by motors located in the center of each carriage, and it shortly increases during the train acceleration. Besides of train motors, underground utilities, construction of subway tunnels and the gro- und-based infrastructure also produces magnetic noise. You can see from the graph that in the Svya- toshyn zone a busy junction is located. Subway measurements of geomagnetic field va- riations were conducted in the interval Universitet and Zhytomyrska metro stations and in the reverse direction (Fig. 5). After processing the digital data all the periods of magnetic induction increase are shown. Between Beresteyska and Shulyavska sta- tions we can see the anomaly of railway station. We can see that in the intervals such as Universitet— Vokzalna and Svyatoshyn—Zhytomyrska the data on both graphs differ, it is explained by the inclina- tion of the route (when a train goes up it uses a mo- tor and when it goes down the motor is turned off). Conclusions. For the territory of Kiev natural geomagnetic field varies within �� 100—50 860 nT, increasing from southwest to northeast. Technological different-period variations that are registered have amplitudes from tens to hundreds of nanoteslas and significantly differ from magnetic field variations on “Kiev” magnetic observatory. The highest values of induction B (up to 100—350 μT) are registered in the subway, while train accelera- tes and slows down; technogenic variation sources have in most cases electrical and ferromagnetic ori- gin, and are associated with turning on/off and wor- king of direct current sources, movement of elect- ric transport including the subway, and mechanical movement of different kinds of vehicles. Fig. 4. Magnetic noise scalar data observed between Beresteyska and Akademmistechko metro stations. M. ORLYUK, A. ROMENETS, I. ORLIUK �� ����� � ���� ������������������������ Noticeable daily rhythm of technogenic sources is proven by people operating mode and manufacturing. We can say that people are always under influ- Fig. 5. Magnetic noise scalar data graphs observed between Universitet and Zhytomyrska metro stations in direct and reverse directions. Natural and technogenic components of megalopolis magnetic field ©©©©© M. Orlyuk, A. Romenets, I. Orliuk, 2016 Magnetic storm influence becomes more and more interesting for people. In this article we describe measurable magnetic field data from different megalopolis regions and from the un- derground passenger transport by the Kyiv city example. There were five observation points evenly situated among the city, and one metro route with direct and reverse direction movement. Collected information shows general situation with magnetic noise in populous cities. Smart- phones are very popular today so we have used one of them as a budget magnetometer in our research. Key words: natural geomagnetic field, technogenic magnetic field, magnetic noise. References Belokrinitskiy V. S., 2009. What do mobile phone us- ers must know? Kiev: University “Ukraine”. 112 p. (in Russian). ence of light, it follows that technogenic magnetic perturbations can produce an effect on the living or- ganisms as well as a strong magnetic storm. Gvishiani A. D., Solov’yev A. A., Agayan S. M., Bogout- dinov Sh. R., Sidorov R. V., 2013. Magnetogramm al- gorithmic system of emission recognition. Earth’s NATURAL AND TECHNOGENIC COMPONENTS OF MEGALOPOLIS MAGNETIC FIELD ����� � ���� ������������������������ � physical fields dynamics. Moscow: Svetoch Plyus, 297—310 (in Russian). ICNIRP Guidelines. Guidelines for limiting exposure to time-varying electric, magnetic, and electromag- netic fields (up to 300 GHz), 1998. Health Physics 74 (4), 494—522. Khramov A. V., Serpov V. Yu., Shumilov O. I., Stepano- va A. S., 2006. The dynamic of an industrial trauma- tism in a zone Kursk magnetic anomaly and cos- mophysical factors influence. Vestnik novykh medi- tsinskikh tekhnologiy (3), 174—176 (in Russian). Korepanov V., Berkman R., Best A., Linte G.-Y., Ma- r’yanyuk Ya., Reda Ya., Payunpaa K., Rakhlin L., 1999. Experimental researches of ferozond magnetome- ters stability. Ukrainskiy metrologichnyy zhurnal (is. 3), 23—25 (in Ukrainian). Kulikov V. Yu., Timofeeva Yu. S., 2011. Evaluating of combined geomagnetic and radiation fields influ- ence on the osmotic resistance of human erythrocy- tes in vitro condition. Meditsina i obrazovanie v Sibiri (4), 12—20 (in Russian). Medvedeva O. A., Kalutskiy P. V., Besedin A. V., Medve- deva S. K., Kalutskiy A. P., 2011. The ecological and epidemiological analysis of children population in- testinal infections disease of area with various level of a geomagnetic field (Kursk magnetic anomaly re- gion). Nauchnyye vedomosti. Seriya Meditsina. Far- matsiya (10), 5—11 (in Russian). Orlyuk M. I., Romenets A. A., Orliuk I. M., 2014. Techni- cal low-frequency magnetic noise in Kiev. Dopovidi NAN Ukrainy (3), 110—114 (in Russian). Orlyuk M. I., 2001. Geophysical ecology — main prob- lems and methods of execution. Geofizicheskiy zhur- nal 23 (1), 49—59 (in Ukrainian). Orlyuk M. I., Romenets A. O., 2004. Ecological mega- lopolis magnetic fields (on the example Kyiv). Eko- logiya i pryrodokorystuvannya (is.), 142—147 (in Uk- rainian). Orlyuk M. I., Romenets A. O., 2005. The new criterion for assessing the space-time disturbance of the Earth’s magnetic field and some aspects of its use. Geofizicheskiy zhurnal 27 (5), 744—754 (in Rus- sian). Pavlovich N. V., Pavlovich S. A., Galliulin Yu. I., 1991. Biomagnetic rhythms. Minsk: Publ. House “Univer- sitetskoye”, 136 p. (in Russian). Physical factors of the working environment, 2003. Sanitary-epidemiological rules and norms. SanPiN 2.2.4.1191-03 “Electromagnetic Fields and Human Health”. Moscow, 19 p. (in Russian). Rezinkina M. M., Pelevin D. E., Dumanskiy Yu. D., Bit- kin S. V., 2009. Geomagnetic field attenuation in apart- ment houses of different structure. Gigiena nasele- nykh mists (54), 209—216 (in Russian). Romenets A. A., Orliuk I. M., 2013. Monitoring and analy- sis of technogenical low-frequency magnetic noise in Kyiv. Geodynamika (2), 314—316 (in Russian). Rozov V. Yu., Pelevin D. Å., Levina S. V., 2013. Experi- mental research into indoor static geomagnetic field weakening phenomenon. Electrotekhnica i Electro- mekhanica (6), 72—76 (in Russian). Serpov V. Yu., 2007. Influence of natural magnetic fi- elds on human safety in areas of geophysical anoma- lies European part of Russia. Abstract on a disser- tation of doctor of medical sciences. St-Petersburg (in Russian). Standart of Building Biology Testing methods: SBM- 2008 [acting from July 2008]. Germany: Institut fur Baubiologie + Okologie. IBM. 5 p. Travkin M. P., 1971. Life and magnetic field. Belgorod: Publisher Belgorod Pedagogical Institute. 192 p. (in Russian). Tyagunov D. S., 2012. Spatial and temporal charac- teristics of the urban of technogenic magnetic noise in the frequency range 0,01—30 Hz. Abstract dis- sertations of the doctor of technical sciences. Yeka- terinburg, 20 p. (in Russian). Tyagunov D. S., 2011. Technogenic electromagnetic field as an ecological factor. Ekologiya urbaniziro- vannykh territoriy (2), 45—50 (in Russian).
id nasplib_isofts_kiev_ua-123456789-103752
institution Digital Library of Periodicals of National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine
issn 0203-3100
language English
last_indexed 2025-12-07T18:20:07Z
publishDate 2016
publisher Інститут геофізики ім. С.I. Субботіна НАН України
record_format dspace
spelling Orlyuk, M.
Romenets, A.
Orliuk, I.
2016-06-23T15:21:18Z
2016-06-23T15:21:18Z
2016
Natural and technogenic components of megalopolis magnetic field / M. Orlyuk, A. Romenets, I. Orliuk // Геофизический журнал. — 2016. — Т. 38, № 1. — С. 78-85. — Бібліогр.: 21 назв. — англ.
0203-3100
https://nasplib.isofts.kiev.ua/handle/123456789/103752
Magnetic storm influence becomes more and more interesting for people. In this article we describe measurable magnetic field data from different megalopolis regions and from the underground passenger transport by the Kyiv city example. There were five observation points evenly situated among the city, and one metro route with direct and reverse direction movement. Collected information shows general situation with magnetic noise in populous cities. Smart- phones are very popular today so we have used one of them as a budget magnetometer in our research.
Вплив магнітних бур на людину стає останнім часом все цікавішим. У статті викладено результати досліджень змінного магнітного поля техногенного походження в різних районах мегаполісу і підземному транспорті на прикладі м. Київ. Виміри проведені в п'яти пунктах у різних районах міста, а також у метро в обох напрямках руху поїзда. Отримана інформація показує загальну ситуацію з магнітним шумом у густонаселених містах. Як бюджетний варіант для вимірювань в метро використаний смартфон з вбудованим магнітометром.
en
Інститут геофізики ім. С.I. Субботіна НАН України
Геофизический журнал
Научные сообщения
Natural and technogenic components of megalopolis magnetic field
Природные и техногенные компоненты магнитного поля мегаполиса
Article
published earlier
spellingShingle Natural and technogenic components of megalopolis magnetic field
Orlyuk, M.
Romenets, A.
Orliuk, I.
Научные сообщения
title Natural and technogenic components of megalopolis magnetic field
title_alt Природные и техногенные компоненты магнитного поля мегаполиса
title_full Natural and technogenic components of megalopolis magnetic field
title_fullStr Natural and technogenic components of megalopolis magnetic field
title_full_unstemmed Natural and technogenic components of megalopolis magnetic field
title_short Natural and technogenic components of megalopolis magnetic field
title_sort natural and technogenic components of megalopolis magnetic field
topic Научные сообщения
topic_facet Научные сообщения
url https://nasplib.isofts.kiev.ua/handle/123456789/103752
work_keys_str_mv AT orlyukm naturalandtechnogeniccomponentsofmegalopolismagneticfield
AT romenetsa naturalandtechnogeniccomponentsofmegalopolismagneticfield
AT orliuki naturalandtechnogeniccomponentsofmegalopolismagneticfield
AT orlyukm prirodnyeitehnogennyekomponentymagnitnogopolâmegapolisa
AT romenetsa prirodnyeitehnogennyekomponentymagnitnogopolâmegapolisa
AT orliuki prirodnyeitehnogennyekomponentymagnitnogopolâmegapolisa