Zdrada Bohdana Slupicza w 1551 r.(okolicznosi zdobycia Braclawia przez Tatarow)

The aim of the text is to shed some light on preconditions and circumstances of the Bratslav defence abilities, as well as on the way the Crimean Tartar siege under the Khan Dewlet Girey in September 1551 developed. In this context the role played by the Bratslav Castle chief defendant Bohdan Siupic...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Соціум. Альманах соціальної історії
Date:2006
Main Author: Nykiel, Beata K.
Format: Article
Language:Polish
Published: Інституту історії України НАН України 2006
Online Access:https://nasplib.isofts.kiev.ua/handle/123456789/104040
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Journal Title:Digital Library of Periodicals of National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine
Cite this:Zdrada Bohdana Slupicza w 1551 r.(okolicznosi zdobycia Braclawia przez Tatarow) / Beata K. Nykiel // Соціум. Альманах соціальної історії. — 2006. — Вип. 6. — С. 29-59. — Бібліогр.: 108 назв. — пол.

Institution

Digital Library of Periodicals of National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine
_version_ 1862748770714779648
author Nykiel, Beata K.
author_facet Nykiel, Beata K.
citation_txt Zdrada Bohdana Slupicza w 1551 r.(okolicznosi zdobycia Braclawia przez Tatarow) / Beata K. Nykiel // Соціум. Альманах соціальної історії. — 2006. — Вип. 6. — С. 29-59. — Бібліогр.: 108 назв. — пол.
collection DSpace DC
container_title Соціум. Альманах соціальної історії
description The aim of the text is to shed some light on preconditions and circumstances of the Bratslav defence abilities, as well as on the way the Crimean Tartar siege under the Khan Dewlet Girey in September 1551 developed. In this context the role played by the Bratslav Castle chief defendant Bohdan Siupica acting as his plenipotentiary in the absence of starost Prince Bohusz Korecki is of special interest. A key factor in Bohdan's decisions and activities seams to be the assessment of Bratslav’s defense potential. Bohdan deemed a traitor by his contemporaries as bearing the most blame for the hasty surrender of the castle to the Tartars and the devastation of a large part of the province, in 1551 he disappeared from all the source-mate-rials, and the Siupicas estates were confiscated in forfeiture by escheat. This incident was to affect the history of the entire Siupica family for several decades to come. Thus, the second part of the article traces the way Bohdan’s treason afflicted the Siupicas fate. Special attention is being paid to the efforts of the family representatives aimed to get back the confiscated landed property and to re-establish both its material basis and good standing in the Bratslav area.
first_indexed 2025-12-07T20:57:12Z
format Article
fulltext
id nasplib_isofts_kiev_ua-123456789-104040
institution Digital Library of Periodicals of National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine
issn 1995-0322
language Polish
last_indexed 2025-12-07T20:57:12Z
publishDate 2006
publisher Інституту історії України НАН України
record_format dspace
spelling Nykiel, Beata K.
2016-06-30T10:33:44Z
2016-06-30T10:33:44Z
2006
Zdrada Bohdana Slupicza w 1551 r.(okolicznosi zdobycia Braclawia przez Tatarow) / Beata K. Nykiel // Соціум. Альманах соціальної історії. — 2006. — Вип. 6. — С. 29-59. — Бібліогр.: 108 назв. — пол.
1995-0322
https://nasplib.isofts.kiev.ua/handle/123456789/104040
The aim of the text is to shed some light on preconditions and circumstances of the Bratslav defence abilities, as well as on the way the Crimean Tartar siege under the Khan Dewlet Girey in September 1551 developed. In this context the role played by the Bratslav Castle chief defendant Bohdan Siupica acting as his plenipotentiary in the absence of starost Prince Bohusz Korecki is of special interest. A key factor in Bohdan's decisions and activities seams to be the assessment of Bratslav’s defense potential. Bohdan deemed a traitor by his contemporaries as bearing the most blame for the hasty surrender of the castle to the Tartars and the devastation of a large part of the province, in 1551 he disappeared from all the source-mate-rials, and the Siupicas estates were confiscated in forfeiture by escheat. This incident was to affect the history of the entire Siupica family for several decades to come. Thus, the second part of the article traces the way Bohdan’s treason afflicted the Siupicas fate. Special attention is being paid to the efforts of the family representatives aimed to get back the confiscated landed property and to re-establish both its material basis and good standing in the Bratslav area.
pl
Інституту історії України НАН України
Соціум. Альманах соціальної історії
Zdrada Bohdana Slupicza w 1551 r.(okolicznosi zdobycia Braclawia przez Tatarow)
The Treason of Bohdan Siupica in 1551 (Circumstances of the Capture of the Bratslav Castle by the Tartars)
Article
published earlier
spellingShingle Zdrada Bohdana Slupicza w 1551 r.(okolicznosi zdobycia Braclawia przez Tatarow)
Nykiel, Beata K.
title Zdrada Bohdana Slupicza w 1551 r.(okolicznosi zdobycia Braclawia przez Tatarow)
title_alt The Treason of Bohdan Siupica in 1551 (Circumstances of the Capture of the Bratslav Castle by the Tartars)
title_full Zdrada Bohdana Slupicza w 1551 r.(okolicznosi zdobycia Braclawia przez Tatarow)
title_fullStr Zdrada Bohdana Slupicza w 1551 r.(okolicznosi zdobycia Braclawia przez Tatarow)
title_full_unstemmed Zdrada Bohdana Slupicza w 1551 r.(okolicznosi zdobycia Braclawia przez Tatarow)
title_short Zdrada Bohdana Slupicza w 1551 r.(okolicznosi zdobycia Braclawia przez Tatarow)
title_sort zdrada bohdana slupicza w 1551 r.(okolicznosi zdobycia braclawia przez tatarow)
url https://nasplib.isofts.kiev.ua/handle/123456789/104040
work_keys_str_mv AT nykielbeatak zdradabohdanaslupiczaw1551rokolicznosizdobyciabraclawiaprzeztatarow
AT nykielbeatak thetreasonofbohdansiupicain1551circumstancesofthecaptureofthebratslavcastlebythetartars