About the possibility to measure the circular polarization of high-energy photon in reaction γ + e⁻ → e⁺ + e⁻ + e⁻

Two possibilities of the measuring high-energy photon circular polarization by means of the process γ + e⁻ → e⁺ + e⁻ + e⁻ are investigated. The first one is connected with the measurement of polarization asymmetry of the cross section when the initial electron beam is longitudinally polarized. The s...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Вопросы атомной науки и техники
Datum:2012
Hauptverfasser: Gakh, G.I., Konchatnij, M.I., Levandovsky, I.S., Merenkov, N.P.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:Englisch
Veröffentlicht: Національний науковий центр «Харківський фізико-технічний інститут» НАН України 2012
Schlagworte:
Online Zugang:https://nasplib.isofts.kiev.ua/handle/123456789/107004
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Назва журналу:Digital Library of Periodicals of National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine
Zitieren:About the possibility to measure the circular polarization of high-energy photon in reaction γ + e⁻ → e⁺ + e⁻ + e⁻ / G.I. Gakh, M.I. Konchatnij, I.S. Levandovsky, N.P. Merenkov // Вопросы атомной науки и техники. — 2012. — № 1. — С. 97-101. — Бібліогр.: 9 назв. — англ.

Institution

Digital Library of Periodicals of National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine
_version_ 1859652463760506880
author Gakh, G.I.
Konchatnij, M.I.
Levandovsky, I.S.
Merenkov, N.P.
author_facet Gakh, G.I.
Konchatnij, M.I.
Levandovsky, I.S.
Merenkov, N.P.
citation_txt About the possibility to measure the circular polarization of high-energy photon in reaction γ + e⁻ → e⁺ + e⁻ + e⁻ / G.I. Gakh, M.I. Konchatnij, I.S. Levandovsky, N.P. Merenkov // Вопросы атомной науки и техники. — 2012. — № 1. — С. 97-101. — Бібліогр.: 9 назв. — англ.
collection DSpace DC
container_title Вопросы атомной науки и техники
description Two possibilities of the measuring high-energy photon circular polarization by means of the process γ + e⁻ → e⁺ + e⁻ + e⁻ are investigated. The first one is connected with the measurement of polarization asymmetry of the cross section when the initial electron beam is longitudinally polarized. The second possibility related with the measurement of the created-positron (or electron) polarization. Just this polarization does not decrease when the photon energy grows up and can be used for effective determination of the photon circular polarization degree. Проанализированы две возможности определения степени циркулярной поляризации высокоэнергетического фотона в процессе γ + e⁻ → e⁺ + e⁻ + e⁻. Первая связана с измерением поляризационной асимметрии сечения, когда начальный пучок электронов обладает продольной поляризацией. Вторая – с измерением поляризации образованного позитрона (или электрона). Показано, что в последнем случае поляризация не убывает с ростом энергии фотона и может быть использована для эффективного определения степени его циркулярной поляризации. Проаналізовано дві можливості визначити ступінь циркулярної поляризації фотона високої енергії у реакції γ + e⁻ → e⁺ + e⁻ + e⁻. Перша пов'язана із вимірюванням асиметрії перерізу, коли початковий пучок електронів має поздовжню поляризацію. Друга -- із вимірюванням поляризації утворюваного позитрона (чи електрона). Виявлено, що в останньому випадку поляризація не зменшується з ростом енергії фотона і може бути використана для ефективного визначення його циркулярної поляризації.
first_indexed 2025-12-07T13:35:39Z
format Article
fulltext ABOUT THE POSSIBILITY TO MEASURE THE CIRCULAR POLARIZATION OF HIGH-ENERGY PHOTON IN REACTION γ + e− → e+ + e− + e− G.I. Gakh 1, M.I. Konchatnij 1, I.S. Levandovsky 2, N.P. Merenkov 1∗ 1National Science Center “Kharkov Institute of Physics and Technology”, 61108, Kharkov, Ukraine 2Karazin Kharkov National University, 61077, Kharkov, Ukraine (Received October 27, 2011) Two possibilities of the measuring high-energy photon circular polarization by means of the process γ + e− → e+ + e− + e− are investigated. The first one is connected with the measurement of polarization asymmetry of the cross section when the initial electron beam is longitudinally polarized. The second possibility related with the measurement of the created-positron (or electron) polarization. Just this polarization does not decrease when the photon energy grows up and can be used for effective determination of the photon circular polarization degree. PACS: 12.20.Ds, 13.40.-f, 13.88.+e 1. INTRODUCTION It is well known that the azimuthal asymmetry in the process of triplet production γ(k) + e−(p) → e−(k1) + e+(k2) + e−(p1) (1) by the high-energy polarized photons on the atomic electrons can be used to measure the photon lin- ear polarization degree (see review [1] and references therein). This single-spin effect lies on theoretical footing of polarimeters where the different angular and energy distributions are used [2]. The circular photon polarization in the region of small and intermediate energies can be probed by the effects due to double-spin correlation in Compton scattering. For example, in Ref. [3] the corresponding possibility is considered, connected with the Comp- ton cross-section asymmetry at scattering of photon on polarized electrons. In principle, one can also measure the polarization of the recoil electron. The double-spin effects may be used to create polarized electron beams using the laser photons [4]. At high energies of photons the use of Compton scattering is not efficient because the Compton cross- section decreases with the growth of an energy. If the photon energy is large, the cross-section of the pair production becomes larger than the Compton scat- tering one. To estimate the respective energy one can use the asymptotic formulas for the total cross- sections [5]: σC ≈ 2πr2 0 x ln x , σpair ≈ 28αr2 0 9 ln x , (2) x = s m2 , s = (k + p)2 , α = 1 137 , where r0 is the classical radius of electron and m is the electron mass. In the rest system of the initial electron (s ≈ 2ωm) the photon energy ω has to be larger than about 80m. Thus, to measure the circular polarization of photons with the energies more than 100m it is advantageous to use the process (1) rather than Compton scattering. The cosmic rays can contain very high-energy photon component, and analysis of their polarization is very important to understand the remarkable fea- tures of the cosmologically distant gamma ray bursts. In the case of the circular polarization of the pho- ton, the cross-section of the process (1) is sensitive to it if either the initial electron is polarized or the polarization of the created electron (positron) is mea- sured. Below we consider both respective experimen- tal setups which can be realized in the scattering of the photons on unpolarized atomic electron or in the collision of photons with the beams of polarized elec- trons. In our calculation, at the high energies, we take into account only so-called Borselino diagrams [6] which correspond to the one-photon exchange in the t-channel between the target electron and created electron-positron pair. 2. DIFFERENTIAL CROSS-SECTION The high-energy differential cross-section of the process (1) in the case of polarized photon and longi- tudinally polarized initial electron beam can be writ- ten in the form: dσ = e6 2(2π)5sq4 V μνBμνdΦ , (3) ∗Corresponding author E-mail address: merenkov@kipt.kharkov.ua PROBLEMS OF ATOMIC SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2012, N 1. Series: Nuclear Physics Investigations (57), p. 97-101. 97 dΦ = d3k1 2E1 d3k2 2E2 d3p1 2ε1 δ(k + p − p1 − k1 − k2) , where s = (k + p)2 is squared total energy in the re- action c.m.s. and ε1 is the energy of electron with 4-momentum p1. The tensor Bμν is defined by the electron current jμ: Bμν = jμj∗ν , jμ = ū(p1)γμu(p) , (4) and in the case of polarized initial electron: Bμν = 1 2 Tr(p̂1 + m)γμ(p̂ + m)(1 − γ5Ŝ)γν , where Sμ is its polarization 4-vector. Taking the trace over the spinor indices we have Bμν = q2gμν + (2pp1)μν − 2im(μνqS) , (5) where the following notation is used: (ab)μν = aμbν + aνbμ, (μνqS) = εμνλρqλSρ, ε1230 = 1 . The tensor Vμν is defined by the electromagnetic current Jμ: Vμν = JμJ∗ ν , Jμ = ū(k1) [ γλ k̂1 − k̂ + m −2(kk1) γμ+ (6) +γμ k̂ − k̂2 + m −2(kk2) γλ ] v(k2)Aλ , where 4-vector Aλ can be chosen as a column Aλ = ( e1λ e2λ ) (7) in the photon spin space. For the photon polarization 4-vectors we choose e1λ = 1 N [ χ1k2λ − χ2k1λ ] , e2λ = 1 N (λkk1k2) , (8) e2 1 = e2 2 = −1 , (e1k) = (e2k) = (e1e2) = 0 , where the following short notation is used: N2 = [ 2χ1χ2χ − m2(χ2 1 + χ2 2) ] , χ1 = (kk1) , χ2 = (kk2) , χ = (k1k2) . If the photon is polarized and the polarization of created electron is measured, one has: Vμν = Tr(k̂1 + m) 1 2 (1 − γ5Ŝ1) [ γλ k̂1 − k̂ + m −2(kk1) γμ+ +γμ k̂ − k̂2 + m −2(kk2) γλ ] (k̂2 − m) [ γν k̂1 − k̂ + m −2(kk1) γρ+ +γρ k̂ − k̂2 + m −2(kk2) γν ] λρ = Tμνλρ λρ . (9) Here S1 is the 4-vector of created electron and λρ is the spin density matrix of the polarized photon: λρ = 1 2 A+ λ (I + �ξ�σ)Aρ , (10) where �σ represents the Pauli matrices and 3-vector �ξ = (ξ1 , ξ2 , ξ3 ) has the photon Stock’s parameters as its components. If polarization of the created elec- tron is not measured one has to eliminate (1−γ5Ŝ1)/2 in the r.h.s. of Eq. (9). When calculating the non-decreasing (with the energy growth) contribution into the unpolarized part of the cross-section one ought to account for terms proportional to s2 in the contraction Tμνλρ(e1λe1ρ + e2λe2ρ)Bμν , which arise due to scalar products (k1p), (k2p), and (kp) . Then we have: Tμνλρ(e1λe1ρ + e2λe2ρ)Bμν = −16 [ 4m2 χ1χ2 (k1p)(k2p)+ (k1p)2 ( q2 χ1χ2 −2m2 χ2 2 ) +(k2p)2 ( q2 χ1χ2 −2m2 χ2 1 )] . (11) To calculate the high-energy cross-section of the process (1) it is convenient to introduce so-called Sudakov’s variables [7]. These variables define an expansion of the final 4-momenta on the longitudi- nal and transversal components relative to the 4- momenta of the initial particles. For the process (1) k2 = αp′ + βk + k⊥ , q = αqp ′ + βqk + q⊥ , (12) p′ = p − m2 s k , s = 2(kp), p′2 = 0, d4k2 = s 2 dαdβd2k⊥, d4q = s 2 dαqdβqd 2q⊥ , where 4-vectors k⊥ and q⊥ are the space-like ones, so k2 ⊥ = −k2, q2 ⊥ = −q2, and k and q are two-dimension Euclidian vectors. The phase space of the final particles can be writ- ten as dΦ = 1 4sβ(1 − β) dβd2kd2q . (13) The variable β is the photon energy fraction that is carried out by the positron β = E2/ω. In terms of the Sudakov’s variables, the independent invariants are expressed as follows: χ1 = m2 + (k + q)2 2(1 − β) , χ2 = m2 + k2 2β , q2 = −q2. (14) Using Eq. (11) we easily obtain the well-known result for unpolarized differential cross-section dσ = 2α3 π2q4 [ 2m2β(1 − β) ( 1 m2 + (k + q)2 − (15) 1 m2 + k2 )2 + q2[1 − 2β(1 − β)] [m2 + (k + q)2][m2 + k2] ] dβd2kd2q . This form of the differential cross-section allows the integration over the positron perpendicular momen- tum where the upper limit of integration can be sup- posed to equal to infinity. For chosen accuracy [8]: dσ = 2α3 πq4 {[ 1−2β(1−β) ] Ψ1 +2β(1−β)Ψ2 } dβd2q , Ψ1 = 1 x ln x + 1 x − 1 , Ψ2 = 1 − 2m2 q2 Ψ1, (16) 98 x = √ 1 + 4m2 q2 . For the pair creation in the process (1) by the high-energy photon and the relativistic initial elec- tron with the energy E >> m at back-to-back colli- sion, the scattered electron can be detected, in prin- ciple, by means of the circular detector which sums all events with θmin < θ < θmax, where the scatter- ing electron angle θ = |q|/E. In this experimental setup the differential cross-section (16) ought to be integrated over the detector aperture. For analytical integration it is convenient to introduce new variable q2/m2 = 4 sh2 z , so that: Ψ1 = 2z cth z, Ψ2 = 1 − z sh z ch z , dq2 q4 = ch zdz 2m2 sh3 z and the integration of the Eq. (16) with respect to azimuth angle and new variable z leads to following positron spectrum for the unpolarized case: dσ dβ = 2αr2 0 { A(z0)−A(z1)+β(1−β) [ B(z0)−B(z1) ]} , (17) where z0 and z1 are the minimal and maximal values of z and functions A(z) and B(z) are A(z) = 2z cth z − 2 ln(2 sh z) , (18) B(z) = 2 3 sh2 z − 2z cth z − 2 3 z cth3 z + 8 3 ln(2 sh z). When writing the latter formulae we fixed the integration constant in such a way that both A(z), B(z) → 0 if z → ∞. This choice is specified by behavior of the cross-section (16) at large |q2/m2|. The total cross-section in such experimental setup can be derived by elementary integration over the positron energy fraction: σ=2αr2 0 [ C(z0)−C(z1) ] , C(z)=A(z)+ B(z) 6 . (19) Note, that in the pair production by the photon on the stationary target with arbitrary mass M the quantity q2 is connected with mass M and energy W of the recoil particle in the laboratory system: q2 = 2M(W − M) , W = √ M2 + l2 , where l is the absolute value of the recoil momentum. It means that in the case of the atomic electron target l = m sh(2z) , (M = m), and for the very heavy target l = 2m sh(z), (M >> m). For the stationary target it is possible to investigate such experimental setup when detector records all events with l > l0 , l0 ∼ m. In this case we can formally suppose the upper limit of integration in Eq. (16) to be equal to infinity. To write the corresponding results it is enough to elimi- nate A(z1), B(z1) and C(z1) in Eqs. (17) and (19). On the other hand, one can study the angular distribution of the recoil electrons. It is easy to see that in this case the angle ϑ between the photon 3-momentum k and the recoil electron one p1 is de- fined by the relation [9] sin2 ϑ = 4m2/(4m2 + q2). It means that large q2 correspond to small recoil angles ϑ and and vice-versa. In this case sh z = ctg ϑ. 3. CROSS-SECTION ASYMMETRY AND CREATED ELECTRON POLARIZATION To evaluate either asymmetry of the cross-section or the created electron polarization one has to calculate the part of cross-section that depends on polarization states either of the initial electron or of the created one. For this goal it is convenient to use the covari- ant form of the electron polarization 4-vectors which enter in Eqs. (5) and (9): S = (pk)p − m2k m(pk) , S1 = (kk1)k1 − m2k m(kk1) . (20) It means that in the rest frame of the initial electron S = (0,−k/|k|), and in the rest frame of the created one S1 = (0,−k/|k|). The asymmetry of the cross-section in considered process is defined by the ratio: A = −iξ2 Tμνλρ(e1λe2ρ − e1ρe2λ)B(a) μν dΦ Tμνλρ(e1λe1ρ + e2λe2ρ)B (s) μν dΦ , (21) where B (s) μν and B (a) μν are the symmetric and antisym- metric parts of the tensor Bμν , respectively. The di- rect calculation for the numerator gives 8ξ2(μνqp) {[ m2 ( 1 χ2 1 + 1 χ2 2 ) − q2 2χ1χ2 ] (μνkq)− − (μνk1q) χ1 − (μνk2q) χ2 } . (22) Because at the used accuracy (μνqp)(μνkq) = q2s, (μνqp)(μνk1q) = q2(1 − β)s, (μνqp)(μνk2q) = q2βs, the respective electron polarization dependent part of the differential cross-section dσ2 is: dσ2 = − 2α3ξ2 sq2π2 { 2m2 [ 1 − β β[(k + q)2 + m2]2 + (23) β (1 − β)[k2 + m2]2 ] + q2 [(k + q)2 + m2][k2 + m2] − 1 − β β[(k + q)2 + m2] − β (1 − β)[k2 + m2] } dβd2kd2q . Note that if the initial electron is polarized in its rest frame opposite to the direction of recoil electron 3- momentum, one has to divide the r.h.s. of Eq. (23) by √ 1 + 4m2/q2. The ratio dσ2/dσ, which define the cross-section asymmetry is of the order q2/s, i.e. it is parame- terically small. On the other hand, dσ2 increases near the edges of the positron spectrum due to terms containing 1/β and 1/(1 − β). This effect is absent in polarization-independent part of the cross-section. Integration of these terms over β leads to large loga- rithmic contribution ln(ω/m) ≈ (1/2) ln(s/m2). Nev- ertheless, the method to determine the photon circu- lar polarization based on the measured cross-section 99 asymmetry in process (1) cannot be efficient at high energies because of above mentioned smallness of the ratio dσ2/dσ. Consider now another possibility based on the measurement of the created electron polarization. In this case we have to calculate: P = −iξ2 T (pol) μνλρ(e1λe2ρ − e1ρe2λ)B(s) μν dΦ Tμνλρ(e1λe1ρ + e2λe2ρ)B (s) μν dΦ , (24) where T (pol) μνλρ is part of the tensor Tμνλρ (see Eq. (9)) that depends on the created electron polarization 4- vector S1. The numerator in the r.h.s. of Eq. (24) can be written as follows: 16mξ2 {[ (k2p) χ1 − (k1p) χ2 ] × [χ1 + χ2 χ1χ2 [ (k2p)(kS1) + χ1(pS1) ] − (kp)(k2S1) χ2 + q2(χ2 − χ1)(kp)(pS1) 2χ1χ2 2 ]} . (25) The necessary scalar products read: 2m(pS1) = s [ 1 − β − m2/χ1 ] , m(kS1) = χ1, m(k2S1) = (k1k2) − m2χ2/χ1), and expression in the braces in the r.h.s. of Eq. (25) becomes very simple: s2q2 8χ2 [1 − 2β χ1 − m2 χ1 ( 1 χ1 − 1 χ2 )] . Now the integration with respect to the positron perpendicular momentum leads to the part of the dif- ferential cross-section which depends on the photon circular polarization degree: dσ2 = 2α3ξ2(1 − 2β) q4x2 [ Ψ2 − Ψ1 ] dβdq2. (26) The created electron polarization along direction −k/|k| is defined by the relation: P = P (β,q2, ξ2) = 2dσ2/dσ, so that P = ξ2(1 − 2β) ( Ψ2 − Ψ1 ) x2 [ (1 − 2β(1 − β))Ψ1 + 2β(1 − β)Ψ2 ] . (27) The corresponding distribution is antisymmetric rel- ative to change β → 1 − β and can vary inside wide interval. It means that the created electron polar- ization is very sensitive to the high energy photon circular polarization. For ξ2 = 1 it is shown in Fig. 1. If the recoil electrons are recorded by narrow cir- cular detector we have to integrate over the detector aperture as described above. This procedure results: P (β, ξ2) = ξ2P (β), P (β) = (1 − 2β) [ D(z0) − D(z1) ] A(z0) − A(z1) + β(1 − β) [ B(z0) − B(z1) ] , D(z) = 2z[th(z) − cth(2z)]. (28) If the whole recoil momenta with l > l0 are recorded then polarization P (β) can be derived with the same rules as it is described at the end of Sec. 2, namely one has to eliminate A(z1), B(z1) and D(z1) in Eq. (28) and use l0 = 2m sh(z0). If the angular distribution of the recoil electron is measured than one has to use sh z = ctg ϑ. In Fig. 2 and 3 we give function P (β) as defined by Eq. (28) for different experimental setups. Fig. 1. Double distribution for the created electron polarization calculated by means Eq. (27) for ξ2 = 1 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 Β �0.5 0.5 P�Β� 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 Β �0.6 �0.4 �0.2 0.2 0.4 0.6 P�Β� Fig. 2. Function P (β) at different values of the minimal recorded recoil electron momentum. The up- per curve corresponds to back-to-back collision with detector aperture 1o < θ < 6o. The lower curves cor- respond to production on atomic electrons: the solid to l0 = 1.1 m, the dashed to l0 = 2.1 m, the dotted to l0 = 17.1 m 100 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 Β �0.4 �0.2 0.2 0.4 P�Β� Fig. 3. Function P (β) at different values of the minimal scattering angles of the recoil electron at fixed value of the maximal one: θmax = 63.6o. The solid line corresponds to θmin = 5o, the dashed – to θmin = 30o, and the dotted –to θmin = 60o 4. CONCLUSIONS The double spin correlations in the process (1) al- low to probe the high-energy photon circular polar- ization. In the region |q2| ≥ δm2, where δ is of the order one, the pair production on the longitudinally polarized electron beam cannot give efficient measure for the circular polarization of the high-energy pho- tons and the created electron polarization is large and does not decrease with the photon energy. Therefore the latter can be used, in principle, to determine the circular polarization degree of high-energy photon. References 1. V.F. Boldyshev, E.A. Vinokurov, N.P. Meren- kov, Yu.P. Peresun’ko. A method for measure- ment of the photon beam linear polarization by means of of recoil electrons asymmetry in the e+e−-pair photoproduction on electrons // Physics of Elementary Particles and Atomic Nu- clei. 1994, v. 25, p. 696-778. 2. I. Endo, S. Kasai, M. Harada, et al. Detection of recoil electrons in triplet photoproduction // Nucl. Instr. and Meth. 1989, v. A280, p. 144-146. 3. A.S. Arychev, A.P. Potylitsin, M.N. Strihkanov. Determination of circular polarization of gamma quanta with energy greater than 10-MeV us- ing Compton polarimeter // arXiv : 0112060[ph]. 2001, 9 p. 4. G.L. Kotkin, V.G. Serbo, V.I. Telnov. Elec- tron (positron) beam polarization by Compton scattering on circularly polarized laser pho- tons // Phys. Rev. ST-Accel. and Beams. 2003, p. 011001-011006. 5. A.I. Akhiezer, V.B. Berestetsky // Quantum electrodynamics. Moscow: “Nauka”, 1969. 6. A. Borselino. Sulle copie di elettroni create da raggi γ in presenza di elettroni // Il Nuovo Ci- mento. 1947, v. 4, p. 112-130 (in Italian). 7. V.G. Gorshkov. Electrodynamic processes in col- liding beams of high energy particles // Usp. Fiz. Nauk. 1973, v. 10, p. 45-75. (in Russian). 8. K.S. Suh and H.A. Bethe. Recoil momentum distribution in electron pair production // Phys. Rev. 1959, v. 115, p. 672-677. 9. E.A. Vinokurov, E.A. Kuraev. Production of triplets by polarized photons // Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz. 1972, v. 63, p. 1142-1150 (in Russian). � ���������� �� � � � ��������� ����� �� ������ ������� �� �� � � �� γ + e− → e+ + e− + e− ���� ���� ���� � ��� �� ���� ���� � ������ ���� ���� � � ������������ �� � � �� ������� ����������� ������� ����������� ����������� ������������� ������� ������ �������� γ + e− → e+ + e− + e−� ��� �� � ����� � �� ������ ��������������� ��� ����� �������� ����� ������� � ����� ��������� �������� ���������� ������������� ����� ! � �� ������ ����������� ������ ������ ��������� "��� ���������#� ��������� ��� �������� ������ ����������� �� �� ��� � ����� ������� ������ � ���� � �� �������� ��� ��� ������� � ���� ����������� ������� ��� ����������� ������������ ��� ���� ����� � ��������� ���� �� ��������� ����� �� �� ������ � ����� � ���� � � �� �� γ + e− → e+ + e− + e− ���� ���� ���� � ��� ��� ���� ���� � ������� ���� ���� � � �������$�� ��� � $ ���� ���$ �������� ����$�� ����������% ���������$% ������ �����% �����$% � �����$% γ + e− → e+ + e− + e−� ���&� �� '����� $� � $�( ���� ��� ���$% �����$��� ���� ������� �� ����� ��������$ �) ����� ��( ���������$(� *���� ! $� � $�( ���� ���������$% �� ��( ����� ��������� "�� ���������#� �� ����� +� �������� � ������ ���������$� �� � ��&�)���� � ����� �����$% ������ $ ��� ���� ���������� ��� ������ ���� ��������� ���� ����������% ���������$%� ,-,
id nasplib_isofts_kiev_ua-123456789-107004
institution Digital Library of Periodicals of National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine
issn 1562-6016
language English
last_indexed 2025-12-07T13:35:39Z
publishDate 2012
publisher Національний науковий центр «Харківський фізико-технічний інститут» НАН України
record_format dspace
spelling Gakh, G.I.
Konchatnij, M.I.
Levandovsky, I.S.
Merenkov, N.P.
2016-10-10T20:23:23Z
2016-10-10T20:23:23Z
2012
About the possibility to measure the circular polarization of high-energy photon in reaction γ + e⁻ → e⁺ + e⁻ + e⁻ / G.I. Gakh, M.I. Konchatnij, I.S. Levandovsky, N.P. Merenkov // Вопросы атомной науки и техники. — 2012. — № 1. — С. 97-101. — Бібліогр.: 9 назв. — англ.
1562-6016
PACS: 12.20.Ds, 13.40.-f, 13.88.+e
https://nasplib.isofts.kiev.ua/handle/123456789/107004
Two possibilities of the measuring high-energy photon circular polarization by means of the process γ + e⁻ → e⁺ + e⁻ + e⁻ are investigated. The first one is connected with the measurement of polarization asymmetry of the cross section when the initial electron beam is longitudinally polarized. The second possibility related with the measurement of the created-positron (or electron) polarization. Just this polarization does not decrease when the photon energy grows up and can be used for effective determination of the photon circular polarization degree.
Проанализированы две возможности определения степени циркулярной поляризации высокоэнергетического фотона в процессе γ + e⁻ → e⁺ + e⁻ + e⁻. Первая связана с измерением поляризационной асимметрии сечения, когда начальный пучок электронов обладает продольной поляризацией. Вторая – с измерением поляризации образованного позитрона (или электрона). Показано, что в последнем случае поляризация не убывает с ростом энергии фотона и может быть использована для эффективного определения степени его циркулярной поляризации.
Проаналізовано дві можливості визначити ступінь циркулярної поляризації фотона високої енергії у реакції γ + e⁻ → e⁺ + e⁻ + e⁻. Перша пов'язана із вимірюванням асиметрії перерізу, коли початковий пучок електронів має поздовжню поляризацію. Друга -- із вимірюванням поляризації утворюваного позитрона (чи електрона). Виявлено, що в останньому випадку поляризація не зменшується з ростом енергії фотона і може бути використана для ефективного визначення його циркулярної поляризації.
en
Національний науковий центр «Харківський фізико-технічний інститут» НАН України
Вопросы атомной науки и техники
Section B. QED Processes at High Energies
About the possibility to measure the circular polarization of high-energy photon in reaction γ + e⁻ → e⁺ + e⁻ + e⁻
О возможности измерения циркулярной поляризации фотона высокой энергии в реакции γ + e⁻ → e⁺ + e⁻ + e⁻
Про можливість вимірювання ступені циркулярної поляризації фотона високої енергії у реакції γ + e⁻ → e⁺ + e⁻ + e⁻
Article
published earlier
spellingShingle About the possibility to measure the circular polarization of high-energy photon in reaction γ + e⁻ → e⁺ + e⁻ + e⁻
Gakh, G.I.
Konchatnij, M.I.
Levandovsky, I.S.
Merenkov, N.P.
Section B. QED Processes at High Energies
title About the possibility to measure the circular polarization of high-energy photon in reaction γ + e⁻ → e⁺ + e⁻ + e⁻
title_alt О возможности измерения циркулярной поляризации фотона высокой энергии в реакции γ + e⁻ → e⁺ + e⁻ + e⁻
Про можливість вимірювання ступені циркулярної поляризації фотона високої енергії у реакції γ + e⁻ → e⁺ + e⁻ + e⁻
title_full About the possibility to measure the circular polarization of high-energy photon in reaction γ + e⁻ → e⁺ + e⁻ + e⁻
title_fullStr About the possibility to measure the circular polarization of high-energy photon in reaction γ + e⁻ → e⁺ + e⁻ + e⁻
title_full_unstemmed About the possibility to measure the circular polarization of high-energy photon in reaction γ + e⁻ → e⁺ + e⁻ + e⁻
title_short About the possibility to measure the circular polarization of high-energy photon in reaction γ + e⁻ → e⁺ + e⁻ + e⁻
title_sort about the possibility to measure the circular polarization of high-energy photon in reaction γ + e⁻ → e⁺ + e⁻ + e⁻
topic Section B. QED Processes at High Energies
topic_facet Section B. QED Processes at High Energies
url https://nasplib.isofts.kiev.ua/handle/123456789/107004
work_keys_str_mv AT gakhgi aboutthepossibilitytomeasurethecircularpolarizationofhighenergyphotoninreactionγeeee
AT konchatnijmi aboutthepossibilitytomeasurethecircularpolarizationofhighenergyphotoninreactionγeeee
AT levandovskyis aboutthepossibilitytomeasurethecircularpolarizationofhighenergyphotoninreactionγeeee
AT merenkovnp aboutthepossibilitytomeasurethecircularpolarizationofhighenergyphotoninreactionγeeee
AT gakhgi ovozmožnostiizmereniâcirkulârnoipolârizaciifotonavysokoiénergiivreakciiγeeee
AT konchatnijmi ovozmožnostiizmereniâcirkulârnoipolârizaciifotonavysokoiénergiivreakciiγeeee
AT levandovskyis ovozmožnostiizmereniâcirkulârnoipolârizaciifotonavysokoiénergiivreakciiγeeee
AT merenkovnp ovozmožnostiizmereniâcirkulârnoipolârizaciifotonavysokoiénergiivreakciiγeeee
AT gakhgi promožlivístʹvimírûvannâstupenícirkulârnoípolârizacíífotonavisokoíenergííureakcííγeeee
AT konchatnijmi promožlivístʹvimírûvannâstupenícirkulârnoípolârizacíífotonavisokoíenergííureakcííγeeee
AT levandovskyis promožlivístʹvimírûvannâstupenícirkulârnoípolârizacíífotonavisokoíenergííureakcííγeeee
AT merenkovnp promožlivístʹvimírûvannâstupenícirkulârnoípolârizacíífotonavisokoíenergííureakcííγeeee