Morphogenesis of Vomeronasal Organ of Pelophylax ridibundus (Amphibia, Anura)
The morphogenesis of the lake frog (Pelophylax ridibundus) vomeronasal organ was studied during different ontogenesis stages. The vomeronasal organ is laid after the formation of olfactory sacs, which are lined by olfactory epithelium, and after choan formation. Vomeronasal organ anlage takes place...
Gespeichert in:
| Datum: | 2013 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | Russian |
| Veröffentlicht: |
Інститут зоології ім. І.І. Шмальгаузена НАН України
2013
|
| Schriftenreihe: | Вестник зоологии |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online Zugang: | https://nasplib.isofts.kiev.ua/handle/123456789/109798 |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| Назва журналу: | Digital Library of Periodicals of National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine |
| Zitieren: | Morphogenesis of Vomeronasal Organ of Pelophylax ridibundus (Amphibia, Anura) / Ya.V. Stepanyuk, M.F. Kovtun // Вестник зоологии. — 2013. — Т. 47, № 4. — С. 357—363. — Бібліогр.: 23 назв. — англ. |
Institution
Digital Library of Periodicals of National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine| id |
nasplib_isofts_kiev_ua-123456789-109798 |
|---|---|
| record_format |
dspace |
| spelling |
nasplib_isofts_kiev_ua-123456789-1097982025-02-09T09:45:43Z Morphogenesis of Vomeronasal Organ of Pelophylax ridibundus (Amphibia, Anura) Морфогенез вомероназального органа Pelophylax ridibundus(Amphibia, Anura) Stepanyuk, Ya.V. Kovtun, M.F. Морфология The morphogenesis of the lake frog (Pelophylax ridibundus) vomeronasal organ was studied during different ontogenesis stages. The vomeronasal organ is laid after the formation of olfactory sacs, which are lined by olfactory epithelium, and after choan formation. Vomeronasal organ anlage takes place during G24 stage of larval development, which is the result of inflection and cell redistribution of olfactory epithelium rostroventral part. Formation of the vomeronasal organ finished at the beginning of metamorphosis. Apparently, vomeronasal organ appeared in aquatic Amphibia ancestors and after their transition from aquatic to terrestrial environment it developed new adaptive functions. Исследовано развитие вомероназального органа лягушки озерной (Pelophylax ridibundus) в разные периоды онтогенеза. Вомероназальный орган закладывается после образования обонятельных мешков, которые выстланы обонятельным эпителием, и хоан. Его закладка происходит на G24 стадии личиночного развития вследствие выпячивания и перераспределения клеток ростровентральной части обонятельного эпителия. Формирование вомероназального органа заканчивается в начале периода метаморфоза. Очевидно, что образование вомероназального органа состоялось в водных предков земноводных, и в результате выхода животных на сушу он приобрел новые адаптивные функции. 2013 Article Morphogenesis of Vomeronasal Organ of Pelophylax ridibundus (Amphibia, Anura) / Ya.V. Stepanyuk, M.F. Kovtun // Вестник зоологии. — 2013. — Т. 47, № 4. — С. 357—363. — Бібліогр.: 23 назв. — англ. 0084-5604 DOI 10.2478/vzoo-2013-0038 https://nasplib.isofts.kiev.ua/handle/123456789/109798 591.3:591.486]:597.6/9 ru Вестник зоологии application/pdf Інститут зоології ім. І.І. Шмальгаузена НАН України |
| institution |
Digital Library of Periodicals of National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine |
| collection |
DSpace DC |
| language |
Russian |
| topic |
Морфология Морфология |
| spellingShingle |
Морфология Морфология Stepanyuk, Ya.V. Kovtun, M.F. Morphogenesis of Vomeronasal Organ of Pelophylax ridibundus (Amphibia, Anura) Вестник зоологии |
| description |
The morphogenesis of the lake frog (Pelophylax ridibundus) vomeronasal organ was studied during different ontogenesis stages. The vomeronasal organ is laid after the formation of olfactory sacs, which are lined by olfactory epithelium, and after choan formation. Vomeronasal organ anlage takes place during G24 stage of larval development, which is the result of inflection and cell redistribution of olfactory epithelium rostroventral part. Formation of the vomeronasal organ finished at the beginning of metamorphosis. Apparently, vomeronasal organ appeared in aquatic Amphibia ancestors and after their transition from aquatic to terrestrial environment it developed new adaptive functions. |
| format |
Article |
| author |
Stepanyuk, Ya.V. Kovtun, M.F. |
| author_facet |
Stepanyuk, Ya.V. Kovtun, M.F. |
| author_sort |
Stepanyuk, Ya.V. |
| title |
Morphogenesis of Vomeronasal Organ of Pelophylax ridibundus (Amphibia, Anura) |
| title_short |
Morphogenesis of Vomeronasal Organ of Pelophylax ridibundus (Amphibia, Anura) |
| title_full |
Morphogenesis of Vomeronasal Organ of Pelophylax ridibundus (Amphibia, Anura) |
| title_fullStr |
Morphogenesis of Vomeronasal Organ of Pelophylax ridibundus (Amphibia, Anura) |
| title_full_unstemmed |
Morphogenesis of Vomeronasal Organ of Pelophylax ridibundus (Amphibia, Anura) |
| title_sort |
morphogenesis of vomeronasal organ of pelophylax ridibundus (amphibia, anura) |
| publisher |
Інститут зоології ім. І.І. Шмальгаузена НАН України |
| publishDate |
2013 |
| topic_facet |
Морфология |
| url |
https://nasplib.isofts.kiev.ua/handle/123456789/109798 |
| citation_txt |
Morphogenesis of Vomeronasal Organ of Pelophylax ridibundus (Amphibia, Anura) / Ya.V. Stepanyuk, M.F. Kovtun // Вестник зоологии. — 2013. — Т. 47, № 4. — С. 357—363. — Бібліогр.: 23 назв. — англ. |
| series |
Вестник зоологии |
| work_keys_str_mv |
AT stepanyukyav morphogenesisofvomeronasalorganofpelophylaxridibundusamphibiaanura AT kovtunmf morphogenesisofvomeronasalorganofpelophylaxridibundusamphibiaanura AT stepanyukyav morfogenezvomeronazalʹnogoorganapelophylaxridibundusamphibiaanura AT kovtunmf morfogenezvomeronazalʹnogoorganapelophylaxridibundusamphibiaanura |
| first_indexed |
2025-11-25T12:15:59Z |
| last_indexed |
2025-11-25T12:15:59Z |
| _version_ |
1849764579662364672 |
| fulltext |
UDC 591.3:591.486]:597.6/9
MORPHOGENESIS OF VOMERONASAL ORGAN
OF PELOPHYLAX RIDIBUNDUS (AMPHIBIA, ANURA)
Ya. V. Stepanyuk1 M. F. Kovtun2
1 Lessya Ukrainka East European University Volyn,
Voli str., 13, Lutsk, 43025 Ukraine.
E-mail: stepanyuk@univer. lutsk.ua
2 Schmalhausen Institute of Zoology, NAS of Ukraine,
B. Khmelnytskogo str., 15, Kyiv 01601, Ukraine
Morphogenesis of Vomeronasal Organ of Pelophylax ridibundus (Amphibia, Anura). Stepanyuk Ya. V.,
Kovtun M. F. – The morphogenesis of the lake frog (Pelophylax ridibundus) vomeronasal organ was stud-
ied during different ontogenesis stages. The vomeronasal organ is laid after the formation of olfactory sacs,
which are lined by olfactory epithelium, and after choan formation. Vomeronasal organ anlage takes place
during G24 stage of larval development, which is the result of inflection and cell redistribution of olfac-
tory epithelium rostroventral part. Formation of the vomeronasal organ finished at the beginning of meta-
morphosis. Apparently, vomeronasal organ appeared in aquatic Amphibia ancestors and after their tran-
sition from aquatic to terrestrial environment it developed new adaptive functions.
Ke y wo r d s: Anura, olfactory system, olfactory epithelium, vomeronasal organ, vomeronasal gland.
Ìîðôîãåíåç âîìåðîíàçàëüíîãî îðãàíà Pelophylax ridibundus (Amphibia, Anura) Ñòåïàíþê ß. Â.,
Êîâòóí Ì. Ô. – Èññëåäîâàíî ðàçâèòèå âîìåðîíàçàëüíîãî îðãàíà ëÿãóøêè îçåðíîé (Pelophylax ridi-
bundus) â ðàçíûå ïåðèîäû îíòîãåíåçà. Âîìåðîíàçàëüíûé îðãàí çàêëàäûâàåòñÿ ïîñëå îáðàçîâàíèÿ
îáîíÿòåëüíûõ ìåøêîâ, êîòîðûå âûñòëàíû îáîíÿòåëüíûì ýïèòåëèåì, è õîàí. Åãî çàêëàäêà ïðî-
èñõîäèò íà G24 ñòàäèè ëè÷èíî÷íîãî ðàçâèòèÿ âñëåäñòâèå âûïÿ÷èâàíèÿ è ïåðåðàñïðåäåëåíèÿ êëå-
òîê ðîñòðîâåíòðàëüíîé ÷àñòè îáîíÿòåëüíîãî ýïèòåëèÿ. Ôîðìèðîâàíèå âîìåðîíàçàëüíîãî îðãàíà
çàêàí÷èâàåòñÿ â íà÷àëå ïåðèîäà ìåòàìîðôîçà. Î÷åâèäíî, ÷òî îáðàçîâàíèå âîìåðîíàçàëüíîãî
îðãàíà ñîñòîÿëîñü â âîäíûõ ïðåäêîâ çåìíîâîäíûõ, è â ðåçóëüòàòå âûõîäà æèâîòíûõ íà ñóøó îí
ïðèîáðåë íîâûå àäàïòèâíûå ôóíêöèè.
Êëþ÷åâûå ñëîâ à: Anura, îáîíÿòåëüíàÿ ñèñòåìà, îáîíÿòåëüíûé ýïèòåëèé, âîìåðîíàçàëüíûé
îðãàí.
Introduction
The olfactory system of vertebrates, including Amphibia, consists of central and peripheral parts.
Amphibian olfactory system is the first one among vertebrates to be divided into main and accessory
(vomeronasal) olfactory systems. Peripheral part of vomeronasal system is represented by vomeronasal or
Jacobson’s organ (VNO). VNO is rather different in various tetrapods. For instance, VNO is absent in teleost
fishes, crocodiles, birds, major part of bats, marine mammals and Old World primates (Bertmar, 1981;
Bhatnagar, Meisami, 1998; Halpern, Martinez-Marcos, 2003). Its functions in adult humans are still an unre-
solved problem (Halpern, 2003).
The VNO topography varies in different amphibian orders. In the majority of Anura, VNO is situated
medially considering principal chamber (PC) (Tsui, 1946; Taniguchi et al., 1996; Jermakowicz et al., 2004;
Wang et al., 2008; Jungblut et al., 2011). In Caudata VNO is laid laterally or ventrolaterally in relation to the
nasal cavity (Dawley, Bass, 1988; Eisthen et al., 1994; Dawley, Crowder, 1995; Eisthen, 2000; Stepanyuk,
Motuzyuk, 2010). The data on the morphogenesis of VNO of caecilians is lacking (Schmidt, Wake, 1990). Despite
a great number of the studies dealing with VNO development, there is no common point of view on its phy-
logenetic origin, functional significance and development patterns. It was supposed, that VNO appeared as sup-
plementary structure for smell perception in atmospheric air (Bertmar, 1981). Therein, Amphibia are rather
interesting as an animal group, which mastered the water and terrestrial border niche during their evolution.
The purpose of this research is to study VNO development in Anura starting from the beginning of its forma-
tion until the defined state. The lake frog, which is a typical anuran representative in the Ukrainian fauna, was
chosen as a research object of the study.
Vestnik zoologii, 47(4): 357—363, 2013
DOI 10.2478/vzoo-2013-0038
Unauthenticated
Download Date | 12/13/16 7:57 PM
Material and methods
The structures of peripheral part of the olfactory analyzer in Pelophylax ridibundus (Pallas, 1771) were
studied during different ontogeny periods. The taxonomy of species was defined based on external morpho-
logical features, particularly, during G18—20 embryonic development stages, during G21—41 larval develop-
ment stages and during metamorphosis period (stages G42—46). Juvenile specimens in the age of 14 days were
also studied. Totally 49 embrios were studied. Eggs and tadpoles were kept in aquaria under invariable tem-
perature and photoperiod (22 ± 2°Ñ; 12 hr dark : 12 hr light). Ontogenesis stages were determined according
to tables of normal Anura development (Gosner, 1960). Material was fixed in 5 % solution of neutral forma-
lin or in 2 % solution of glutaraldehyde in 0.1M Cacodylate buffer. After thorough washing the material was
placed into homogenized paraffin media Histomix®. Block slicing was performed serially in frontal and sagit-
tal planes, slice thickness was 10—15 μm; slices were stained with cresyl violet according to Nissl and with hema-
toxylin-eosin according to Beemer. Histological preparation photography was conducted using Zeiss Axio Imager
M1 microscope with Zeiss AxioVision v.4.63 software in a unique equipment collective usage center, located
in Ukrainian NAS Schmalhausen Institute of Zoology. Morphometry was conducted from the very beginning
of VNO cavity formation using “Morphologia 5.0” software. The nomenclature proposed by Jermakowicz et
al. (2004) was chosen for description and identification of olfactory structures. Cranium structures definition
was conducted according to Pugener, Maglia (2007).
The terminology of Jermakowicz et al. (2004) and Pugener, Maglia (2007) was used for description and
identification of olfactory structures and cranium structures.
Result
According to our data, the olfactory placodes are the first structures of a periphe-
ral part of a lake frog olfactory system appearing during embryogenesis (G18 embryoge-
nesis stage). At the next stage they invaginate. This leads to formation of olfactory pits
(G19) and olfactory sacs (G23—24). After the break of olfactory sacs ventrocaudal wall
and secondary nostrils (choanea) formation, PC is formed, which dorsomedial wall is cov-
ered with olfactory epithelium (OE).
VNO primordium appears during 24 larval development stage of P. ridibundus
ontogenesis as the result of OE cell inflation and redistribution in external nostrils area.
The structure looks like a small oval bulge, which is located between ventral OE part and
trabecular lamina horns. Earlier (G23 stage), as the result of dorsolateral OE part infla-
tion, the lateral appendix (fig. 1, a) is laid. Internal nostrils are being laid on the same
stage. From G24 till G26 stage, VNO doesn’t change its topography and does not
increase in size (fig. 1, a).
At the next developmental stage, VNO increases in size, expands caudally under ven-
tral wall of PC (fig. 1, b). During this period the fissure-like cavity forms in VNO, this
cavity increases in size and at G30 stage penetrates with caudal ending the ventral wall
of PC. Thus, VNO cavity connects with the PC and becomes the predecessor of inferi-
or chamber medial corner. At stage G27 the first secretory unit of vomeronasal gland
(VNG), or Jackobson gland appears at the VNO dorsomedial wall.
Intensive formation of new secretory units and gland excretory duct formation goes
on till G30 stage. Gland secretory units consist of single-layer gland epithelium; granu-
locytes nuclei are round, large and basally located (fig. 1, b). The vomeronasal epithe-
lium (VNE) becomes more differentiated at G30 stage, its thickness is significantly less
than OE thickness from the stage G27 till the stage G30 and varies in scope from 41.08
± 1.85 μm to 57.18 ± 2.14 μm, but volume increases in size from 0.00048 mm3 (G27
stage) to 0.00247 mm3 (G30 stage).
During the following developmental stages (G31—38) VNO stretches rostrally and
considerably increases in size due to the increase of its own cavity that is shaped into duct
form (fig. 2, à). The maximim width of VNE is in the medial part of medial corner. VNG
increases in size and shifts caudomedially in the relation to VNO. VNE thickness, dur-
ing the period of research, decreases from 53.52 ± 7.2 μm (G31) to 40.35 ± 5.86 μm
(G38), while its volume, on the contrary, continues to increase significantly from
0.00106 mm3 to 0.00645 mm3.
358 Ya. V. Stepanyuk, M. F. Kovtun
Unauthenticated
Download Date | 12/13/16 7:57 PM
During the G39—42 ontogenesis stages VNO moves medially by its rostral end and
takes its definitive position under the PC (fig. 2, b). Sensor epithelium, especially in a
medial VNO part, is differentiated into layers. VNG, which is located between VNO and
nasal septum, significantly increases in size and also takes its definitive position. VNG
duct pierces through mediocaudal VNO wall and opens in VNO cavity (fig. 3, a).
359Morphogenesis of Vomeronasal Organ of Pelophylax ridibundus (Amphibia, Anura)
Fig. 1. Transverse section of P. ridibundus principal nasal cavity and vomeronasal organ: à – G26 larval deve-
lopment stages; b – G30 larval development stages; en – exsternal nares; oe – olfactory epithelium; cp –
principal chamber; bc – buccal cavity; ct – trabecular horn; la – lateral appendix; vno – vomeronasal organ;
vng – vomeronasal gland.
Ðèñ. 1. Ïîïåðå÷íûé ñðåç ÷åðåç îñíîâíóþ íîñîâóþ ïîëîñòü è âîìåðîíàçàëüíûé îðãàí. P. ridibundus: à –
G26 ñòàäèÿ ëè÷èíî÷íîãî ðàçâèòèÿ; b – G30 ñòàäèÿ ëè÷èíî÷íîãî ðàçâèòèÿ; en – âíåøíèå íîçäðè; oå –
îáîíÿòåëüíûé ýïèòåëèé; ñð – îñíîâíàÿ ïîëîñòü; bc – ðîòîâàÿ ïîëîñòü; ñt – ðîã òðàáåêóëû; la – ëàòå-
ðàëüíûé àïïåíäèêñ; vno – âîìåðîíàçàëüíûé îðãàí; vng – âîìåðîíàçàëüíàÿ æåëåçà.
Fig. 2. Transverse section of P. ridibundus principal nasal cavity and vomeronasal organ: à – G38 larval devel-
opment stages; b – G40 larval development stages. oe – olfactory epithelium; cp – principal chamber; vne –
vomeronasal epithelium; vnc – vomeronasal cavity; vng – vomeronasal gland.
Ðèñ. 2. Ïîïåðå÷íûé ñðåç ÷åðåç îñíîâíóþ íîñîâóþ ïîëîñòü è âîìåðîíàçàëüíûé îðãàí. P. ridibundus: à –
G38 ñòàäèÿ ëè÷èíî÷íîãî ðàçâèòèÿ; b – G40 ñòàäèÿ ëè÷èíî÷íîãî ðàçâèòèÿ; oå – îáîíÿòåëüíûé ýïè-
òåëèé; ñð – îñíîâíàÿ ïîëîñòü; vne – âîìåðîíàçàëüíûé ýïèòåëèé; vnc – âîìåðîíàçàëüíàÿ ïîëîñòü; vng –
âîìåðîíàçàëüíàÿ æåëåçà.
Unauthenticated
Download Date | 12/13/16 7:57 PM
During this developmental stage simple tubularalveolar Bowman’s glands, that are absent
in VNE, appear in OE depth. Three large (probably, salivary) glands, which ducts open
in mouth cavity, are located caudally, rostrally and laterally from choanea. Additional
olfactory nerve (vomeronasal) that lies between medial VNO part and nasal septum
becomes visible. During this period, the middle chamber, a rostral inflection of PC over
the VNO, is formed. In comparison with the previous development stage, VNE thick-
360 Ya. V. Stepanyuk, M. F. Kovtun
Fig. 3. Sagital sections of P. ridibundus at G42 stage in medial part of principal nasal cavity (a); transverse sec-
tions at stage G44 (b); oe – olfactory epithelium; cp – principal chamber; cm – middle chamber; vne –
vomeronasal epithelium; vnc – vomeronasal cavity; vng – vomeronasal gland; bc – buccal cavity; sg – sali-
vary gland; sn – solum nasi; sln – septum nasi; tn – tectum nasi; ls – lamina superior; li – lamina inferi-
or; nld – nasolacrimal duct.
Ðèñ. 3. Ñàãèòòàëüíûé ñðåç ãîëîâû P. ridibundus â ìåäèàëüíîé ÷àñòè îñíîâíîé íîñîâîé ïîëîñòè íà G42
ñòàäèè (à) è ïîïåðå÷íûé ñðåç ãîëîâû íà G44 ñòàäèè ìåòàìîðôîçà (b); oå – îáîíÿòåëüíûé ýïèòåëèé;
ñð – îñíîâíàÿ ïîëîñòü; cm – ñðåäíÿÿ ïîëîñòü; vne – âîìåðîíàçàëüíûé ýïèòåëèé; vnc – âîìåðîíà-
çàëüíàÿ ïîëîñòü; vng – âîìåðîíàçàëüíàÿ æåëåçà; bc – ðîòîâàÿ ïîëîñòü; sg – ñëþííàÿ æåëåçà; sn –
septum nasi; sln – solum nasi; tn – tectum nasi; ls – lamina superior; li – lamina inferior; nld – nasolacrimal
duct.
Fig. 4. Sagittal section of P. ridibundus at G42 stage at lateral part of principal nasal cavity after 14 days of meta-
morphosis finish: oe – olfactory epithelium; cp – principal chamber; cm – middle chamber; vne – vomeronasal
epithelium; vnc – vomeronasal cavity; vng – vomeronasal gland; bc – buccal cavity; sg – salivary gland; oln –
olfactory nerve; bo – olfactory bulb; sln – solum nasi; tn – tectum nasi; ls – lamina superior; li – lamina infe-
rior.
Ðèñ. 4. Ñ àãèòòàëüíûé ñðåç ãîëîâû P. ridibundus â ëàòåðàëüíîé ÷àñòè îñíîâíîé íîñîâîé ïîëîñòè íà 14-é
äåíü ïîñëå îêîí÷àíèÿ ìåòàìîðôîçà: oå – îáîíÿòåëüíûé ýïèòåëèé; ñð – îñíîâíàÿ ïîëîñòü; cm – ñðåä-
íÿÿ ïîëîñòü; vne – âîìåðîíàçàëüíûé ýïèòåëèé; vnc – âîìåðîíàçàëüíàÿ ïîëîñòü; vng – âîìåðîíàçàëü-
íàÿ æåëåçà; bc – ðîòîâàÿ ïîëîñòü; sg – ñëþííàÿ æåëåçà; oln – îáîíÿòåëüíûé íåðâ; bo – îáíÿòåëü-
íàÿ ëóêîâèöà; sln – solum nasi; tn – tectum nasi; ls – lamina superior; li – lamina inferior.
Unauthenticated
Download Date | 12/13/16 7:57 PM
ness increases from 59.85 ± 2.56 μm to 60.89 ± 4.45 μm and VNE volume increases from
0.009 mm3 to 0.0094 mm3.
During the metamorphosis period from G43 till 46 stages VNO morphogenesis is
associated with a further nasal cavity. During this period PC increases in size, but its OE
doesn’t become more differentiated. Rostral part of the PC in the region of external nos-
trils is connected with the fissure-like middle chamber, that increases in size (fig. 3, b).
Nasolacrimal duct falls laterally into it and VNO is located ventromedially. VNO cavi-
ty through the isthmus is medially connected with lateral inferior chamber recess, which
has no sensory epithelium. Thereby, at the end of metamorphosis period, the entire nasal
cavity is interconnected and have definitive morphologies. VNG doesn’t change signif-
icantly. VNE becomes more differentiated, in particular receptor cells in its medial part
have significantly noticeable cilia and basal membrane is covered externally with the layer
of numerous pigmental cells. VNE thickness decreases in comparison with the previous
developmental stage and vary in narrow range from 45.19 ± 8.14 μm to 49.09 ± 2.83 μm,
but its volume dramatically increases, and on the G46 stage equals to 0,403 mm3.
After metamorphosis (14 days) VNE thickness is unchangeable, while VNO volume
considerably increases (0.651 mm3) (fig. 4).
Discussion
In general, our data coincide with a slight difference with the other authors’ data relat-
ed to VNO anlage in other Ranidae representatives. However, these processes differ in the
terms of structure formation, and, in a smaller extent, in their topography. The VNO pri-
mordium in P. ridibundus can be found at G24 stage (beginning of larval development peri-
od) in rostroventral OE part. Basically, our data on VNO development in P. ridibundus
agree with the data of other authors concerning the other Ranidae. VNO of Rana chensi-
nensis appears later than VNO of P. ridibundus at G26 stage of larval development
between OE and trabecule horns (Wang et al., 2008); VNO of Rhinella (Bufo) arenarum
occurs rostroventrally as a dorsal OE diverticulum during the G24—25 stages (Jungblut et
al., 2011). Similar VNO development pattern was found in Eleutherodactylus coqui, which
has no larval development period (Jermakowicz et al., 2004). VNO development of Rana
japonica as OE inflection is observed on the 4th day after the tadpole escape from egg mem-
branes (from the free floating larvae stage till the end of metamorphosis) (Taniguchi et
al., 1996). Tsui (1946) names VNO an anterior inferior sac, and its anlage in Rana nigro-
maculata occurs as the result of superior sac ventrorostral part inflection.
VNO development in Bufonidae occurs considerably later. For instance in Bufo amer-
icanus, VNE appears in medial wall of PC only during the last stages of larval development (G34)
(Jermakowicz et al., 2004). This probably connects with OE differentiation into dorsal and
ventral parts in the rostral part of PC.
VNO of Xenopus laevis – the representative of one of the most primitive Anura fam-
ilies – Pipidae, is also laid during later stages of larval development (N/F37—38)
(according to normal development tables, Nieuwkoop, Faber, 1956). In Ascaphus truei
(Leiopelmatidae), that have some organization features bringing them closer to Caudata,
VNO is layed at the larval development stage not medially, but in ventrolateral part of
PC invagination and then goes on medially into OE (Benzekri, Reiss, 2012). Thereby,
in comparison with other Anura, VNO anlage occurs laterally but not in rostromedial OE
part. VNO of A. truei mature specimens looks like horizontal fissure covered by VNE,
which shifts medially and is located under PC. Though VNO comes closer to “rana type”
topography (Medvedeva, 1975), but its shape differs from P. ridibundus VNO shape.
VNO of mature caudates has rather different topography. VNO of Plethodon cinereus
is located in ventrolateral diverticulum of PC (Dawley, Bass, 1988), VNO of Amphiuma
tridactylum and Ambystoma mexicanum is located in lateral inflection of PC (Eisthen et
361Morphogenesis of Vomeronasal Organ of Pelophylax ridibundus (Amphibia, Anura)
Unauthenticated
Download Date | 12/13/16 7:57 PM
al., 1994; Eisthen, 2000). Therefore, there are some exceptions, e. g. VNO of Siren inter-
media (Sirenia) is located more medially in relation to PC (Eisthen, 2000). Mentioned
cases allow considering VNO of Anura to be more variable structure.
VNO of some amphibians has no sensor epithelium. Eisthen (2000) found that
Necturus maculosus proteus has lateral evagination covered with non-sensory epithelium
instead of VNE. These data need further studying and discussion. In this case, what is
the function of this evagination in Proteus? There is no answer to the moment.
In P. ridibundus, VNG anlage takes place during the G27 stage of larval develop-
ment period near dorsomedial wall of formed VNO. VNG is called medial nasal gland
by Tsui (1946), obviously, due to its location. Gland begins developing after the begin-
ning of VNO development can be found also in R. (B.) arenarum during G28—29 stages
(Jungblut et al., 2011), R. chensinensis during G34 stage (Wang et al., 2008), R. japon-
ica – on the 6th day after VNO anlage (Taniguchi et al., 1996), X. laevis during the N/F42
stages (Nieuwkoop, Faber, 1956) and E. coqui at the end of embryonic development dur-
ing TS12 stage (Jermakowicz et al., 2004). In the last species, the gland is laid laterally
in relation to VNO, in contrast to the majority of Anura. In certain species, e. g. B. amer-
icanus, VNG begins developing simultaneously with the beginning of VNO development
(G34) (Jermakowicz et al., 2004). This can probably take place due to the late VNO for-
mation. VNE of P. ridibundus, in contrast to OE, has no Bowman’s glands, that appear
during metamorphosis (G41 – 42), and this coincides with the data of other authors
(Jermakowicz et al., 2004; Wang et al., 2008; Jungblut et al., 2011). Obviously, that VNG
secretion begins earlier than the secretion of Bowman’s glands. This indicates that VNO
starts functioning in water environment (larval period), while OE starts functioning dur-
ing transition to terrestrial environment (metamorphosis period). The early function of
vomeronasal system is testified by its central part structure. It was shown that synaptic
contacts between VNO and supplementary olfactory bulb are already formed at the begin-
ning of larval development period (Jungblut et al. , 2011), thus vomeronasal system is
functionally ripe. Our results support Eisthen (2000) hypothesis that states that VNO first
appeared in water tetrapods and it is not an adaptation of olfactory system to terrestrial
life conditions. Interestingly enough, that mammal VNG develops at the end of embry-
onic period (Garrosa et al., 1998).
According to Nowack and Wöhrmann-Repenning (2009), not only VNG, but also
lacrimal gland (harderian gland) takes part in VNO functioning. Gland secretion is excud-
ed through nasolacrimal duct, opened near external nostrils, where it fixes chemical irri-
tants that later get to VNO.
In this case, what is the function of VNG? It is important that snakes have lacrimal
gland connected with VNO through nasolacrimal duct, and have no VNG at all
(Holtzman, Halpern, 1990). Since VNE has no Bowman’s glands, it is obvious that VNG
function is executed by lacrimal gland.
In spite of VNO being relatively well developed in Amphibia, one hardly can sup-
pose that VNO had emerged as the result of transition to terrestrial or amphibian way
of life (Medvedeva, 1975). It is not correct to suppose that VNO is a typical feature of
the animals with well-developed scent while vertebrates who belong to the microsmatic
group (i. e., some Primates) have also VNO (Bhatnagar, Meisami, 1998). The specific
feature of VNO is that some vertebrates have this organ only during early ontogenesis stages
(Aves). Thereby, vertebrate VNO is characterized by wide variation: between different
vertebrate taxons, interspecific, specific, both qualitative and quantitative. This obvious-
ly is the evidence of loss of VNO functional meaning during regressive evolution.
Concerning VNO origin, it is evident that it appeared first in water Amphibia
ancestors as preadaptation and got new adaptive functions as the result of animals tran-
sition to terrestrial conditions.
362 Ya. V. Stepanyuk, M. F. Kovtun
Unauthenticated
Download Date | 12/13/16 7:57 PM
We agree with Eisthen’s idea (2000) as to the origin of VNO in aquatic tetrapods
and consider it to be a preadaptation that got new functions in the result of transition to
terrestrial conditions. According to Jarvik (1942) rhipidistia had VNO, but the conclu-
sions were not final, because they were made based on presence of invagination in olfac-
tory capsules.
VNO diversity in tetrapods can probably be the result of functional specialization
in some lineages and loss of its function in some other lineages.
References
Benzekri N. A. , Reiss J. O. Olfactory Metamorphosis in the Coastal Tailed Frog Ascaphus truei (Amphibia,
Anura, Leiopelmatidae) // J. Morphol. – 2012. – 273. – P. 68—87.
Bertmar G. Evolution of vomeronasal organs in vertebrates // Evolution. – 1981. – 35. – Ð. 359—366.
Bhatnagar K. P., Meisami E. Vomeronasal organ in bats and primates: extremes of structural variability and its
phylogenetic implications // Microsc. Res. Tech. 1998. – 43. – P. 465—475.
Dawley E. M., Crowder J. Sexual and seasonal differences in the vomeronasal epithelium of the red-backed sala-
mander (Plethodon cinereus) // J. Comp. Neurol. – 1995. – 359. – Ð. 382—390.
Eisthen H. L. Presence of the vomeronasal system in aquatic salamanders // Philos Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B. –
2000. – 355. – Ð. 1209—1213.
Eisthen H. L., Sengelaub D. R., Schroeder D. M., Alberts J. R. Anatomy and forebrain projections of the olfac-
tory and vomeronasal organs in axolotls (Ambystoma mexicanum) // Brain Behav. Evol. – 1994. – 44. –
P. 108—124.
Garrosa M., Gayoso M. J., Esteban F. J. Prenatal development of the mammalian vomeronasal organ // Microsc.
Res. Tech. – 1998. – 41. – P. 456—470.
Gosner K. L. A simplified table for staging anuran embryos and larvae with notes on identification //
Herpetologica. – 16, N 2. – P. 183—190.
Halpern M. The Evolution of the Vomeronasal System // Evolution of Nervous Systems / Editor-in-Chief: TàTà
Jon. – Oxford : Academic Press, 2007. – P. 407 – 415.
Halpern M., Martinez-Marcos À. Structure and function of the vomeronasal system: an update // Prog.
Neurobiol. – 2003. –70, N 3. – P. 245—318.
Holtzman D. A., Halpern M. Embryonic and neonatal development of the vomeronasal and olfactory systems
in garter snakes (Thamnophis spp.) // J. Morphol. – 1990. – 203. – P. 123—140.
Jarvik E. On the structure of the snout of crossopterygians and lower gnathostomes in general // Zool. Bidrag
fran Uppsala. – 1942. –21. – P. 235—675.
Jermakowicz W. J. III., Dorsey D. A., Brown A. L. et. al. Development of the nasal chemosensory organs in
two terrestrial anurans: the directly developing frog, Eleutherodactylus coqui (Anura: Leptodactylidae),
and the metamorphosing toad, Bufo americanus (Anura: Bufonidae) // J. Morphol. – 2004. – 261. –
P. 225—248.
Jungblut L. D., Pozzi A. G., Paz D. A. Larval development and metamorphosis of the olfactory and vomeronasal
organs in the toad Rhinella (Bufo) arenarum (Hensel, 1867) // Acta Zool. – 2011. – 92, N 4. –
P. 305—315.
Medvedeva I. M. The olfactory organ of amphibians and its phylogenetic significance. – Leningrad : Nauka, 1975. –
175 p. – Russian : Ìåäâåäåâà È. Ì. Îðãàí îáîíÿíèÿ àìôèáèé è åãî ôèëîãåíåòè÷åñêîå çíà÷åíèå.
Nieuwkoop V. H., Faber J. Normal Table of Xenopus laevis (Daudin). – North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1956.
Pugener L. A. , Maglia A. M. Skeletal morphology and development of the olfactory region of Spea multipli-
cata (Anura: Pelobatidae) // J. Anat. – 2007. – 211, N 6. – P. 737—753.
Reiss J. O., Eisthen H. L. Chemical senses: Comparative anatomy and physiology in amphibians // Sensory
Evolution on the Threshold: Adaptations in Secondarily Aquatic Vertebrates / Eds J. G. M. Thewissen,
S. Nummela. – Berkeley CA : Univ California Press, 2007. – P. 43—63.
Schmidt A., Wake M. H. Olfactory and vomeronasal systems of caecilians (Amphibia: Gymnophiona) // J.
Morphol. – 1990. – 205. – P. 255—268.
Stepanyuk Ya. V., Motuzyuk A. P. Olfactory epithelium structure of newt cristate laurenti, 1768 (Amphibian:
caudata) // Reports of morphology. – 2010. – N 2. – P. 379—381.
Taniguchi K., Toshima Y., Saito T. R., Taniguchi K. Development of the olfactory and vomeronasal organ in
the Japanese Reddish Frog, Rana japonica // J. Vet. Med. Sci. – 1996. – 58. – P. 7—15.
Tsui C-L. Development of olfactory organ in Rana nigromaculata // Journal of Microscopical Science. – 1946. –
87. – P. 61—90.
Wang H., Zhao H., Tai F., Zhang Y. Postembryonic development of the olfactory and vomeronasal organs in
the frog Rana chensinensis // Zool. Sci. (Tokyo). – 2008. – 25. – P. 503—508.
Received 8 January 2013
Accepted 20 May 2013
363Morphogenesis of Vomeronasal Organ of Pelophylax ridibundus (Amphibia, Anura)
Unauthenticated
Download Date | 12/13/16 7:57 PM
<<
/ASCII85EncodePages false
/AllowTransparency false
/AutoPositionEPSFiles true
/AutoRotatePages /None
/Binding /Left
/CalGrayProfile (None)
/CalRGBProfile (sRGB IEC61966-2.1)
/CalCMYKProfile (ISO Coated)
/sRGBProfile (sRGB IEC61966-2.1)
/CannotEmbedFontPolicy /Error
/CompatibilityLevel 1.3
/CompressObjects /Off
/CompressPages true
/ConvertImagesToIndexed true
/PassThroughJPEGImages true
/CreateJDFFile false
/CreateJobTicket false
/DefaultRenderingIntent /Perceptual
/DetectBlends true
/DetectCurves 0.1000
/ColorConversionStrategy /sRGB
/DoThumbnails true
/EmbedAllFonts true
/EmbedOpenType false
/ParseICCProfilesInComments true
/EmbedJobOptions true
/DSCReportingLevel 0
/EmitDSCWarnings false
/EndPage -1
/ImageMemory 524288
/LockDistillerParams true
/MaxSubsetPct 100
/Optimize true
/OPM 1
/ParseDSCComments true
/ParseDSCCommentsForDocInfo true
/PreserveCopyPage true
/PreserveDICMYKValues true
/PreserveEPSInfo true
/PreserveFlatness true
/PreserveHalftoneInfo false
/PreserveOPIComments false
/PreserveOverprintSettings true
/StartPage 1
/SubsetFonts false
/TransferFunctionInfo /Apply
/UCRandBGInfo /Preserve
/UsePrologue false
/ColorSettingsFile ()
/AlwaysEmbed [ true
]
/NeverEmbed [ true
]
/AntiAliasColorImages false
/CropColorImages true
/ColorImageMinResolution 150
/ColorImageMinResolutionPolicy /OK
/DownsampleColorImages true
/ColorImageDownsampleType /Bicubic
/ColorImageResolution 150
/ColorImageDepth -1
/ColorImageMinDownsampleDepth 1
/ColorImageDownsampleThreshold 2.00000
/EncodeColorImages true
/ColorImageFilter /DCTEncode
/AutoFilterColorImages false
/ColorImageAutoFilterStrategy /JPEG
/ColorACSImageDict <<
/QFactor 0.76
/HSamples [2 1 1 2] /VSamples [2 1 1 2]
>>
/ColorImageDict <<
/QFactor 0.76
/HSamples [2 1 1 2] /VSamples [2 1 1 2]
>>
/JPEG2000ColorACSImageDict <<
/TileWidth 256
/TileHeight 256
/Quality 30
>>
/JPEG2000ColorImageDict <<
/TileWidth 256
/TileHeight 256
/Quality 30
>>
/AntiAliasGrayImages false
/CropGrayImages true
/GrayImageMinResolution 150
/GrayImageMinResolutionPolicy /OK
/DownsampleGrayImages true
/GrayImageDownsampleType /Bicubic
/GrayImageResolution 150
/GrayImageDepth -1
/GrayImageMinDownsampleDepth 2
/GrayImageDownsampleThreshold 2.00000
/EncodeGrayImages true
/GrayImageFilter /DCTEncode
/AutoFilterGrayImages true
/GrayImageAutoFilterStrategy /JPEG
/GrayACSImageDict <<
/QFactor 0.76
/HSamples [2 1 1 2] /VSamples [2 1 1 2]
>>
/GrayImageDict <<
/QFactor 0.15
/HSamples [1 1 1 1] /VSamples [1 1 1 1]
>>
/JPEG2000GrayACSImageDict <<
/TileWidth 256
/TileHeight 256
/Quality 30
>>
/JPEG2000GrayImageDict <<
/TileWidth 256
/TileHeight 256
/Quality 30
>>
/AntiAliasMonoImages false
/CropMonoImages true
/MonoImageMinResolution 1200
/MonoImageMinResolutionPolicy /OK
/DownsampleMonoImages true
/MonoImageDownsampleType /Bicubic
/MonoImageResolution 600
/MonoImageDepth -1
/MonoImageDownsampleThreshold 1.50000
/EncodeMonoImages true
/MonoImageFilter /CCITTFaxEncode
/MonoImageDict <<
/K -1
>>
/AllowPSXObjects false
/CheckCompliance [
/None
]
/PDFX1aCheck false
/PDFX3Check false
/PDFXCompliantPDFOnly false
/PDFXNoTrimBoxError true
/PDFXTrimBoxToMediaBoxOffset [
0.00000
0.00000
0.00000
0.00000
]
/PDFXSetBleedBoxToMediaBox true
/PDFXBleedBoxToTrimBoxOffset [
0.00000
0.00000
0.00000
0.00000
]
/PDFXOutputIntentProfile (None)
/PDFXOutputConditionIdentifier ()
/PDFXOutputCondition ()
/PDFXRegistryName (http://www.color.org?)
/PDFXTrapped /False
/SyntheticBoldness 1.000000
/Description <<
/ENU (Versita Adobe Distiller Settings for Adobe Acrobat v6)
/POL (Versita Adobe Distiller Settings for Adobe Acrobat v6)
>>
>> setdistillerparams
<<
/HWResolution [2400 2400]
/PageSize [2834.646 2834.646]
>> setpagedevice
|