Impurity dynamics in tokamak like magnetic configuration with X-point

Expressions for plasma flow velocities are obtained in invariant form in non ideal MHD approach. Simulation of
 plasma flow trajectories in tokamak like magnetic configuration with X-point is carried out. The method of plasma
 flow regulating in the vicinity of separatrix by varying...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Вопросы атомной науки и техники
Date:2008
Main Authors: Moskvitin, A.O., Shishkin, A.A.
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Національний науковий центр «Харківський фізико-технічний інститут» НАН України 2008
Subjects:
Online Access:https://nasplib.isofts.kiev.ua/handle/123456789/110355
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Journal Title:Digital Library of Periodicals of National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine
Cite this:Impurity dynamics in tokamak like magnetic configuration with X-point / A.O. Moskvitin, A.A. Shishkin // Вопросы атомной науки и техники. — 2008. — № 4. — С. 89-94. — Бібліогр.: 10 назв. — англ.

Institution

Digital Library of Periodicals of National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine
_version_ 1860260614424756224
author Moskvitin, A.O.
Shishkin, A.A.
author_facet Moskvitin, A.O.
Shishkin, A.A.
citation_txt Impurity dynamics in tokamak like magnetic configuration with X-point / A.O. Moskvitin, A.A. Shishkin // Вопросы атомной науки и техники. — 2008. — № 4. — С. 89-94. — Бібліогр.: 10 назв. — англ.
collection DSpace DC
container_title Вопросы атомной науки и техники
description Expressions for plasma flow velocities are obtained in invariant form in non ideal MHD approach. Simulation of
 plasma flow trajectories in tokamak like magnetic configuration with X-point is carried out. The method of plasma
 flow regulating in the vicinity of separatrix by varying divertor coil current is proposed. To sustain MHD simulation
 the impurity ion Newton-Lorentz simulations near X-point are carried out. Отримано вирази для швидкостей потоків плазми в інваріантній формі у наближені неідеальної МГД.
 Проведено моделювання траєкторій потоків плазми в магнітній конфігурації типу токамак з Х-точкою.
 Запропоновано метод регулювання потоку плазми на диверторні пластини шляхом змінювання струму в
 диверторних провідниках. Для підтвердження МГД-моделювання було проведено Ньютон-Лоренц-
 моделювання иона домішки поблизу Х-точки. Получены выражения для скоростей потоков плазмы в инвариантной форме в приближении неидеальной
 МГД. Проведено моделирование траекторий потоков плазмы в магнитной конфигурации типа токамак с Х-
 точкой. Предложен метод регулирования потока плазмы на диверторные пластины путем изменения тока в
 диверторных проводниках. Для подтверждения МГД-моделирования было проведено Ньютон-Лоренц-моде-
 лирование примесного иона вблизи Х-точки.
first_indexed 2025-12-07T18:54:42Z
format Article
fulltext IMPURITY DYNAMICS IN TOKAMAK LIKE MAGNETIC CONFIGURA- TION WITH X-POINT A.O. Moskvitin1, A.A. Shishkin2,1 1Department of Physics and Technology, Kharkiv “V.N.Karazin” National University, Kharkiv, Ukraine; 2National Science Center “Kharkov Institute of Physics and Technology”, Kharkiv, Ukraine E-mail: Anton.Moskvitin@gmail.com Expressions for plasma flow velocities are obtained in invariant form in non ideal MHD approach. Simulation of plasma flow trajectories in tokamak like magnetic configuration with X-point is carried out. The method of plasma flow regulating in the vicinity of separatrix by varying divertor coil current is proposed. To sustain MHD simulation the impurity ion Newton-Lorentz simulations near X-point are carried out. PACS: 52.55.Fa 1. MOTIVATION OF STUDY A lot of experimental investigations on tokamaks are devoted to decreasing heat load on plasma faced compo- nents of the divertor and controlling impurity transport at plasma edge. The interest to this problem is caused by attempts to model fusion reactor scenarios on nowadays fusion devices. Method of X-point position sweeping is considered in framework of these studies. In this paper a simple analytical model is proposed for analyzing the efficiency of the controlling the impu- rity ions with the divertor configuration. This approach is based on non ideal MHD consideration supplemented by single particle gyro-orbits simulation. The effect of vertical sweeping of the magnetic rib is considered for cylindrical geometry. The simplicity of magnetic con- figuration is provided by authors’ wish to select the ef- fect of X-point on plasma transport at the edge. The simplest configuration (Fig. 1) is described in the Section 2. MHD fluxes are investigated in the Sec- tion 3. The dynamics of the impurity ions are considered in the Section 4. The principal conclusions are summa- rized in the Section 5. 2. MAGNETIC CONFIGURATION WITH X-POINT Uniform magnetic field 0B is parallel to z-axis and is maintained externally. Rotational transform of mag- netic lines is created due to plasma current. Fig.1. Magnetic field model Assuming plasma current density j in following form zej             Ψ Ψ−= j b j α 10 , (1) where 0j − plasma current density at magnetic axis, jα - current density profile parameter, Ψ − magnetic sur- face function, edgeplasmab Ψ=Ψ , one can obtain com- ponents of magnetic field from following equation jB c π4rot = , (2) and then Ψ using ( ) 0=Ψ∇B . (3) From the very beginning it is assumed that current is distributed uniformly zej 0 )0( j= . Thus we obtain      = 1,,0 )0( 0 )0( ι a rBB , (4) 2 0 )0(     =Ψ a rb , (5) where 00 2 caBIb plΣ= and constb −= 0 )0(ι rotational transform angle, plIΣ − net current, a − cylindrical ves- sel radius. At next step of approximation it is assumed that plasma current density is distributed as in Eq. (1) with circular magnetic surfaces )0(Ψ . Thus it is yield      = 1,,0 )1( 0 )1( ι a rBB , (6) ( )                 + −+    =Ψ 1 111 22 0 )1( jj jar a rb αα α , (7) where ( ) ( )[ ]jarbb j ααι 2 00 )1( 1 −+= . For the next step approximation )1(Ψ can be substituted into Eq. (1) and then expressions for )2(B and )2(Ψ can be obtained from Eqs. (2,3). We restrict ourselves to first approximation because obtained expressions give us satisfied description for magnetic field, in particular, parabolic profile for safety factor (rotational transform angle). ___________________________________________________________ ВОПРОСЫ АТОМНОЙ НАУКИ И ТЕХНИКИ. 2008. № 4. Серия: Плазменная электроника и новые методы ускорения (6), с.89-94. X Y Z I X X-point Separatrix 89 The linear current XI is included to take into con- sideration the effect of divertor coils on magnetic con- figuration (see Fig.1). Components of magnetic field produced by this current are given by following expres- sion ( ){ } ( ) ( ) )sin(21 0,)sin(,)cos( 2 0)( ϑ ϑϑ arar arbB XX ++ +−=B . (8) Then substituting )()1( XBBB += in Eq. (3) and in- tegrating it we obtain Ψ as )()1( XΨ+Ψ=Ψ , where ( ) ( )( ))sin(21ln 2 1 2)( ϑararbX X ++=Ψ , 02 caBIb XX = . (9) It is convenient to normalize )1(Ψ in following way ),(),( ),(),(),( OOXX OO N rr rrr ϑϑ ϑϑϑ Ψ−Ψ Ψ−Ψ=Ψ , (10) where OOr ϑ, and XXr ϑ, are coordinates of O-point (magnetic axis) and X-point (magnetic separatrix rib) respectively. It should be noted that after such proce- dure NΨ takes value ‘0’ on magnetic axis and ‘1’ on magnetic separatrix. Radial profiles of ),( Xz rj ϑ and ),( XN r ϑΨ are pre- sented on Fig.2. Fig.2. Radial profiles of ),( Xz rj ϑ and ),( XN r ϑΨ For simulations following values for magnetic con- figuration parameters are used: TB 4,30 = ; MAI pl 2=Σ ; 5,0=jα ; MAI X 2,0= . 3. PLASMA MHD-FLOWS DISSIPATIVE MODEL MHD approach is often used for treating impurity transport at the plasma edge. 3.1. TRANSPORT EQUATIONS 01 =+×++∇− aa aa aaa c nenep FBuE , (11) 0 2 5 2 =+×+∇− a a aaa aa pc neTn FBq , (12) with friction forces 1aF and 2aF taken in following form [3-4] ∑ += b b bab b ab a p ll quF 12111 5 2 , (13) ∑ += b b bab b ab a p ll quF 22212 5 2 , (14) where a and b denote species of plasma component, ap , an and aT are the pressure, density and temperature of the plasma component a, ae is the charge of the single plasma component a ion, au and aq are particles and heat flows velocity of plasma component a, E and B are the electric and magnetic fields, ab ikl are the trans- port coefficients. The transport coefficients ab ikl can be calculated with the use of technique proposed [1], and further developed in Refs [2-5]. 3.2. TRANSPORT COEFFICIENTS Further we consider a simple case of deuterium plas- ma containing a single species of impurity ion. For such case the analysis of the force balance was carried out by Rutherford [2] for a magnetic field model with circular magnetic surfaces. We suggest to analyze both force and thermal conduction equations in a same way be- cause of theirs similarity. On this stage we don’t assume any special magnetic field configuration. For this case according to [3] transport coefficients could be expressed in such way 111111111 lllll IIIDDIDD ==−=−= , (15a) 221211212 lllll DDDIIDDD ==−=−= , (15b) 322 ll DD = , (15c) 0222221211212 ====== IDDIIIIDIIDI llllll , (15d) )(* 101 DIDI ZCZll = , (16a) )(* 202 DIDI ZCZll = , (16b) )(* 303 DIZCll = , (16c)         ⋅⋅== − − sec cmg1069,2 342 7 0 2 3 2 1 D DDD DD DD T MZnnml τ , (17) [ ] ⋅⋅== − sec1022,6 ln24 3 22 4 22 2 3 2 1 2 3 2 1 bab aa bab aa ab ZZn TM een Tm λπ τ (18) 14 310 cma an n −= − normalized density; aT − plasma temperature taken in keV units; aM − mass number of species a. Effective charge number DIZ is given by fol- lowing expression DDIIDI neneZ 22= . Coefficients )(* xCi are obtained in [2] and can be obtained in a way which is shown in [3]: x xC + += 59,0 31,048,0)(* 1 , (19a) x xC + += 59,0 41,03,0)(* 2 , (19b) x xxxC + ⋅+⋅+= 59,0 55,05,013,1)(* 3 . (19c) 90 Index D denotes light ion (e.g. deuterium) and index I denotes impurity ion. Expressions (15), (16) and (19) are derived assuming Dm << Im (so called Lorentz colli- sion model). 3.3. STATIONARY PLASMA MHD VELOCITIES To obtain equations describing plasma transport par- allel to magnetic field lines scalar products of Eqs. (11) and (12) with B are taken ( )BEDDD D D nep p qlUl +− ∇=+ II II II 21 5 2 , (20a) ( )BEIII D D nep p qlUl +− ∇=−− II II II 21 5 2 , (20b) DD D D Tn p qlUl II II II ∇−=+ 2 5 5 2 32 , (20c) where subscript ‘II’ denotes components parallel to magnetic field lines, ID uuU −= − relative velocity. As it seen left hand parts of Eqs.(20a) and (20b) are equal up to minus sign that is why to have a solution right hand parts should satisfy such condition ( ) ( ) 0=+∇−+∇− BEBE IIIDDD nepnep IIII (21) Integrating these equations taking into account con- dition (21) it is obtained ( ) ( )         ∇− + ∇ −= − − DD II eff Tnl fZ pl lllU II II II 21 31 31 2 2 2 5 1 . (22) If ( )Ψ= DD pp , ( )Ψ= II pp , ( )Ψ= TT then 0=IIU , or IIII ID uu = . (23) To obtain equations for describing plasma transport across to magnetic field lines vector products of Eqs.(11) and (12) with B are taken. After integration of obtained equations it is yielded ( ) ( )DDeff DD D DD dED Tnlpl p ∇+∇ +∇×+=⊥ 212 1 1 ωρ ωρ hvu , (24a) ( ) ( ).11 11 212 DDeff DDII I DDII dEI Tnlpl fZ p fZ ∇+∇ −∇×+=⊥ ωρ ωρ hvu (24b) In expressions (22) and (23) following designations are done: IIIieff pfZpp ∇−∇=∇ − 1)( , cm eB D D =ω , DDD nm=ρ , BEv ×= 2B c dE , BBh = . Yielding Eqs.24 we neglect terms proportional ( )2ab ikl because of its smallness in comparison to those taken into account. Such approach let us to analyze main transport processes in rather simple way. Consid- erable results were obtained with the use of this tech- nique in [5-7]. 3.4. PLASMA PARAMETERS AND ELECTRIC FIELD MODEL First of all it is supposed that common temperature of deuterium and impurity plasma has been settled. Then it is assumed that plasma parameters depend on ),( ϑrNΨ in following way ( ) nDnD NDOD nn 217.01 ααΨ−= , (25a) ( ) TT NOTT 217.01 ααΨ−= , (25b) nI NIXI nn αΨ= , (25c) where Dn and In are plasma densities of deuterium and impurity respectively, T is plasma common temperature, iα − are profile parameters, subscripts ‘O’ and ‘X’ de- notes plasma parameters values on magnetic axis (O- point) and magnetic separatrix rib (X-point). Numerical coefficient 0,7 is inputted in Eqs.(25) to describe non zero temperature and deuterium density beyond separatrix. After T , Dn and In are defined plasma component partial pressures are yielded in natu- ral way kTnp DD = , (26a) kTnp II = . (26b) Radial profiles of plasma parameters at angle direc- tion of X-point ( 23πϑ = ) are shown at Fig.3 for fol- lowing profile parameters 81 =nDα , 12 =nDα , 121 == TT αα , 4=nIα . These profile parameters are used for further simula- tions with such values of 14 310 cmDOn −= , 13 310 cmIXn −= and 20OT = keV. Fig.3. Radial profiles of plasma parameters at angle di- rection of X-point ( 23πϑ = ) For electric potential following expression is used ( ) EE NEE 2110 ααΨ−Φ=Φ . (27) Electric field was defined as EΦ− ∇=E . For further simulations such parameter values are used 0 10 kVEΦ = − , 81 =Eα and 12 =Eα . ___________________________________________________________ ВОПРОСЫ АТОМНОЙ НАУКИ И ТЕХНИКИ. 2008. № 4. Серия: Плазменная электроника и новые методы ускорения (6), с.89-94. 91 3.5. FLOW TRAJECTORY SIMULATION RESULTS To simulate flow trajectory we use following equa- tion 0, =× IDd ur . (28) In this section we try to simulate separatrix position varying. At Fig.4 flow trajectories of impurity plasma in deuterium plasma are shown in the vicinity of separatrix with the same start position in two magnetic configura- tions with IX = 0,2 MA and IX = 0,22 MA. Due to diver- tor coil current increasing separatrix is shifted inside. As it shown at Fig.4 separatrix 1XΨ which corresponds to IX = 0,2 MA is above start point and separatrix 2XΨ which corresponds to IX = 0,22 MA is under start point. This difference in initial conditions leads to increasing outside separatrix flow. Another aspect is that flow tra- jectories in both case don’t differ much along separatrix and only near X-point flows deviates from each other (Fig.4,b) In first case flow stays in confinement volume and in second case flow moves out to imaginary diver- tor plate at position sin( ) 110 cmr ϑ = − under X-point ( sin( ) 108 cmX Xr ϑ = − ). Fig.4. Flow trajectories of impurity plasma in deuterium plasma in the vicinity of separatrix with the same start position in magnetic configurations with IX = 0,2 MA and IX = 0,22 MA At Fig.5 poloidal velocity of impurity plasma flow is presented. As it seen from Fig.5 poloidal velocity has the smallest value near X-point. On poloidal motion ra- dial electric field plays the key role [9], [10]. As soon as electrostatic potential is function of Ψ at X-point Er=0 because 0=∂ Ψ∂ r . Fig.5. Poloidal flow velocity ϑu of impurity plasma flow in deuterium plasma in the vicinity of separatrix in magnetic configuration with IX = 0,22 MA Fig.6. Flow trajectories of deuterium plasma in plasma with impurity (W+1) in the vicinity of separatrix with the same start position in magnetic configurations with IX = 0,2 MA and IX = 0,22 MA As it seen from Fig.6 deuterium plasma flow in the vicinity of separatrix don’t differ from impurity plasma flow. The effect of plasma flow escape due to divertor coil current increasing can be used as method of improving divertor regime. Application of similar technique on LHD (Japan) gives considerable results in long pulse experiments [8]. Efficiency of plasma edge refinement by X-point sweeping depends on impurity fraction at the plasma edge and current modulation. a b 92 4. SINGLE PARTICLE GYROORBIT MOD- EL The MHD results obtained above can be supported with the single gyro-orbit particle motion simulation. We can see how the principle physics deduction based on MHD approach can be enriched with the single parti- cle study. The particle trajectory due to drifts in the in- homogeneous magnetic and electric fields distinguishes from the magnetic surface. The consequences of this feature demonstrates itself in the different streamlines of the MHD flows and particle trajectories near separatrix. 4.1. NEWTON-LORENTZ EQUATION For simulation ion gyro-orbit we use following equations vr = dt d , (29)      ×+= BvEv c ee mdt d 1 , (30) where r and v are particle radius vector and velocity re- spectively, e and m are charge and mass of ion under consideration. Models for electric and magnetic field are used the same as in MHD approach. For simulations we use tungsten ion W+16. Tungsten is the most probable material of divertor face compo- nents. At the plasma edge charge number can be changed in wide range due to ionization/recombination processes. 4.2. SINGLE PARTICLE GYROORBIT SIMULA- TION RESULTS On Fig.7 particle trajectory is presented. It is should be noted that due to drifts particle trajectory deflects from magnetic field line. As it shown on Fig.7,c mag- netic field line escapes from confinement volume be- cause its start position is above separatrix. In spite of start positions of magnetic field line and particle are the same (see Fig.7,b) particle stays in confinement volume. On Fig.7,b some simulation parameters are presented. 0.01startr∆ = + cm means that start position is 0.01 cm above separatrix. In presented case 5Lstartr ρ=∆ where Lρ is particle Larmor radius. It should be noted that during motion ion crosses magnetic separatrix and become inside separatrix (Fig.7,c). Then it crosses separatrix once more and be- come outside separatrix. As it seen from Fig.7,b particle has done two full turns in poloidal direction and each time returns to its start position outside separatrix. Parti- cle trajectory differs from magnetic field line due to drifts in inhomogeneous electric and magnetic fields We’d like to mention that poloidal velocity of ion at start position is smaller than near X-point. Due to this effect near start position gyro-orbit spiral is seen well and near X-point only solid thick line is seen. As soon as space scale at Fig.7,b and Fig.7,c is the same it is possible to see that thickness of this thick line is about 2 Larmor radii. The same behavior of poloidal velocity is demonstrated above for plasma flow (Fig.5). CONCLUSIONS. SIMULATION MODELS COMPARISON Simple analytical non ideal MHD model is formulat- ed. This model is applied for description of X-point sweeping effect on plasma flow near separatrix. It is demonstrated that it is possible to control plasma flow towards divertor plates by small variance of divertor coils (Fig.4). The efficiency of such control could be investigated analytically for more complicate configurations with the help of proposed model. ___________________________________________________________ ВОПРОСЫ АТОМНОЙ НАУКИ И ТЕХНИКИ. 2008. № 4. Серия: Плазменная электроника и новые методы ускорения (6), с.89-94. a b 93 Fig.7. Single particle trajectory and magnetic field line which crosses particle orbit at start position in magnet- ic configuration with IX = 0,2 MA a)Full scale trajectory; b) enlarged fragment near start position; c) enlarged fragment near X-point The results of single particle gyro-orbit motion sim- ulation matches in main aspects with MHD-flows tra- jectories. As it seen from Fig.7 discrepancy is caused by drifts in the inhomogeneous magnetic and electric fields. MHD approach should be supplemented with Newton-Lorentz investigation of impurity ion motion near separatrix because near X-point even small varia- tions in initial position and gyro phase defines escaping or penetration of ion under consideration. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS This work is supported by Science and Technology Center in Ukraine (Project 3685). REFERENCES 1. S.I. Braginskii. Transport Phenomena in Plasma // Reviews of Plasma Physics (edited by M.A.Leon- tovich). 1963, v.1, p.183-272. 2. P.H. Rutherford. Impurity transport in the Pfirsch- Schluter regime // The Physics of Fluids. 1974, v.17, №9, p.1782-1784. 3. S.P. Hirshman. Transport of a multiple-ion species plasma in the Pfirsch-Schluter regime // The Physics of Fluids. 1977, v.20, №4, p.589-598. 4. S.P.Hirshman, D.J.Sigmar. Neoclasical transport of impurities in tokamak plasmas // Nuclear Fusion, 1981, v.21, №9, p.1079-1201. 5. A.A. Shishkin. Impurity reversal in tokamak plas- ma with resonance magnetic fields due to local sources // Nuclear fusion. 1981, v.21, №5, p.603- 607. 6. A.A. Shishkin. About the possibility of impurity ion accumulation in the island region in helical plasma // Journal of plasma and Fusion Research SERIES. 2004, v.6, p.500-503. 7. A.A. Shishkin, H.Mynik. Effect of magnetic islands on the impurity flows in NCSX geometry //Prob- lems of Atomic Science and Technology. Series «Plasma Physics». 2005, v.11, №2, p.23-25 8. Y. Nakamura, S. Masuzaki, T. Morisaki, et al. Im- pact of real-time magnetic axis sweeping on steady state divertor operation in LHD // Nuclear Fusion. 2006, v.46, №7, p.714-724. 9. D.Kh. Morozov, J.J.E. Herrera, V.A. Rantsev- Kartinov. Impurity penetration through the stochas- tic layer near the separatrix in tokamaks // Physics of Plasmas. 1995, v.2, №5, p.1540-1547. 10. V. Rozhansky, E. Kaveeva, S. Voskoboynikov, A.H. Bekheit, D. Coster, X. Bonnin, R. Schneider. Impact of E×B drifts on the distribution of impuri- ties in the tokamak plasma edge // Journal of Nu- clear Materials. 2003, 313-316, p.1141-1149. Статья поступила в редакцию 08.05.2008 г. ДИНАМИКА ПРИМЕСИ В МАГНИТНОЙ КОНФИГУРАЦИИ ТИПА ТОКАМАК С Х-ТОЧКОЙ А.А. Москвитин, А.А. Шишкин Получены выражения для скоростей потоков плазмы в инвариантной форме в приближении неидеальной МГД. Проведено моделирование траекторий потоков плазмы в магнитной конфигурации типа токамак с Х- точкой. Предложен метод регулирования потока плазмы на диверторные пластины путем изменения тока в диверторных проводниках. Для подтверждения МГД-моделирования было проведено Ньютон-Лоренц-моде- лирование примесного иона вблизи Х-точки. ДИНАМІКА ДОМІШКИ В МАГНІТНІЙ КОНФІГУРАЦІЇ ТИПУ ТОКАМАК З Х-ТОЧКОЮ А.О. Москвітін, О.О. Шишкін Отримано вирази для швидкостей потоків плазми в інваріантній формі у наближені неідеальної МГД. Проведено моделювання траєкторій потоків плазми в магнітній конфігурації типу токамак з Х-точкою. Запропоновано метод регулювання потоку плазми на диверторні пластини шляхом змінювання струму в диверторних провідниках. Для підтвердження МГД-моделювання було проведено Ньютон-Лоренц- моделювання иона домішки поблизу Х-точки. c 94 1. Motivation of study 2. Magnetic Configuration with X-point 3. plasma MHD-flows dissipative model 3.1. transport equationS 3.2. transport coefficients 3.3. stationarY plasma MHD velocities 3.4. Plasma parameters and electric field model 3.5. Flow trajectory simulation results 4. Single particle gyroorbit model 4.1. Newton-lorentz equation 4.2. single particle gyroorbit simulation results ConclusionS. REFERENCES Динамика примеси в магнитной конфигурации типа токамак с Х-точкой Динаміка Домішки в магнітній конфігурації типу токамак з Х-точкою
id nasplib_isofts_kiev_ua-123456789-110355
institution Digital Library of Periodicals of National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine
issn 1562-6016
language English
last_indexed 2025-12-07T18:54:42Z
publishDate 2008
publisher Національний науковий центр «Харківський фізико-технічний інститут» НАН України
record_format dspace
spelling Moskvitin, A.O.
Shishkin, A.A.
2017-01-03T16:52:36Z
2017-01-03T16:52:36Z
2008
Impurity dynamics in tokamak like magnetic configuration with X-point / A.O. Moskvitin, A.A. Shishkin // Вопросы атомной науки и техники. — 2008. — № 4. — С. 89-94. — Бібліогр.: 10 назв. — англ.
1562-6016
PACS: 52.55.Fa
https://nasplib.isofts.kiev.ua/handle/123456789/110355
Expressions for plasma flow velocities are obtained in invariant form in non ideal MHD approach. Simulation of&#xd; plasma flow trajectories in tokamak like magnetic configuration with X-point is carried out. The method of plasma&#xd; flow regulating in the vicinity of separatrix by varying divertor coil current is proposed. To sustain MHD simulation&#xd; the impurity ion Newton-Lorentz simulations near X-point are carried out.
Отримано вирази для швидкостей потоків плазми в інваріантній формі у наближені неідеальної МГД.&#xd; Проведено моделювання траєкторій потоків плазми в магнітній конфігурації типу токамак з Х-точкою.&#xd; Запропоновано метод регулювання потоку плазми на диверторні пластини шляхом змінювання струму в&#xd; диверторних провідниках. Для підтвердження МГД-моделювання було проведено Ньютон-Лоренц-&#xd; моделювання иона домішки поблизу Х-точки.
Получены выражения для скоростей потоков плазмы в инвариантной форме в приближении неидеальной&#xd; МГД. Проведено моделирование траекторий потоков плазмы в магнитной конфигурации типа токамак с Х-&#xd; точкой. Предложен метод регулирования потока плазмы на диверторные пластины путем изменения тока в&#xd; диверторных проводниках. Для подтверждения МГД-моделирования было проведено Ньютон-Лоренц-моде-&#xd; лирование примесного иона вблизи Х-точки.
This work is supported by Science and Technology&#xd; Center in Ukraine (Project 3685).
en
Національний науковий центр «Харківський фізико-технічний інститут» НАН України
Вопросы атомной науки и техники
Термоядерный синтез (коллективные процессы)
Impurity dynamics in tokamak like magnetic configuration with X-point
Динаміка домішки в магнітній конфігурації типу токамак з Х-точкою
Динамика примеси в магнитной конфигурации типа токамак с Х-точкой
Article
published earlier
spellingShingle Impurity dynamics in tokamak like magnetic configuration with X-point
Moskvitin, A.O.
Shishkin, A.A.
Термоядерный синтез (коллективные процессы)
title Impurity dynamics in tokamak like magnetic configuration with X-point
title_alt Динаміка домішки в магнітній конфігурації типу токамак з Х-точкою
Динамика примеси в магнитной конфигурации типа токамак с Х-точкой
title_full Impurity dynamics in tokamak like magnetic configuration with X-point
title_fullStr Impurity dynamics in tokamak like magnetic configuration with X-point
title_full_unstemmed Impurity dynamics in tokamak like magnetic configuration with X-point
title_short Impurity dynamics in tokamak like magnetic configuration with X-point
title_sort impurity dynamics in tokamak like magnetic configuration with x-point
topic Термоядерный синтез (коллективные процессы)
topic_facet Термоядерный синтез (коллективные процессы)
url https://nasplib.isofts.kiev.ua/handle/123456789/110355
work_keys_str_mv AT moskvitinao impuritydynamicsintokamaklikemagneticconfigurationwithxpoint
AT shishkinaa impuritydynamicsintokamaklikemagneticconfigurationwithxpoint
AT moskvitinao dinamíkadomíškivmagnítníikonfíguracíítiputokamakzhtočkoû
AT shishkinaa dinamíkadomíškivmagnítníikonfíguracíítiputokamakzhtočkoû
AT moskvitinao dinamikaprimesivmagnitnoikonfiguraciitipatokamakshtočkoi
AT shishkinaa dinamikaprimesivmagnitnoikonfiguraciitipatokamakshtočkoi