Some problems in the theory of early universe evolution

We continue consideration of physical characteristics of early Universe. Here our attention is concentrated on the three topics: thermodynamics, relic helium, energy of physical vacuum. Продовжуємо розгляд фізичних характеристик раннього Всесвіту. Зосереджуємо нашу увагу тут на трьох питаннях: термо...

Повний опис

Збережено в:
Бібліографічні деталі
Опубліковано в: :Вопросы атомной науки и техники
Дата:2007
Автор: Sannikov-Proskuryakov, S.S.
Формат: Стаття
Мова:Англійська
Опубліковано: Національний науковий центр «Харківський фізико-технічний інститут» НАН України 2007
Теми:
Онлайн доступ:https://nasplib.isofts.kiev.ua/handle/123456789/110955
Теги: Додати тег
Немає тегів, Будьте першим, хто поставить тег для цього запису!
Назва журналу:Digital Library of Periodicals of National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine
Цитувати:Some problems in the theory of early universe evolution / S.S. Sannikov-Proskuryakov // Вопросы атомной науки и техники. — 2007. — № 3. — С. 206-209. — Бібліогр.: 6 назв. — англ.

Репозитарії

Digital Library of Periodicals of National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine
_version_ 1860068909600735232
author Sannikov-Proskuryakov, S.S.
author_facet Sannikov-Proskuryakov, S.S.
citation_txt Some problems in the theory of early universe evolution / S.S. Sannikov-Proskuryakov // Вопросы атомной науки и техники. — 2007. — № 3. — С. 206-209. — Бібліогр.: 6 назв. — англ.
collection DSpace DC
container_title Вопросы атомной науки и техники
description We continue consideration of physical characteristics of early Universe. Here our attention is concentrated on the three topics: thermodynamics, relic helium, energy of physical vacuum. Продовжуємо розгляд фізичних характеристик раннього Всесвіту. Зосереджуємо нашу увагу тут на трьох питаннях: термодинаміка, реліктовий гелій, енергія фізичного вакууму. Продолжаем рассмотрение физических характеристик ранней Вселенной. Сосредотачиваем наше внимание здесь на трех вопросах: термодинамика, реликтовый гелий, энергия физического вакуума
first_indexed 2025-12-07T17:09:34Z
format Article
fulltext SOME PROBLEMS IN THE THEORY OF EARLY UNIVERSE EVOLUTION S.S. Sannikov-Proskuryakov A.I. Akhiezer Institute of Theoretical Physics National Science Center “Kharkov Institute of Physics and Technology”, Kharkov, Ukraine; e-mail: sanpros@kipt.kharkov.ua We continue consideration of physical characteristics of early Universe. Here our attention is concentrated on the three topics: thermodynamics, relic helium, energy of physical vacuum. PACS: 98.80.Cq, 98.80.Bp, 05.70.–a, 65.40.Gr , 05.70.Jk 1. THERMODYNAMICS Zero cycle. First of all it is needed to emphasize that the notion of temperature may be introduced for ensem- bles of Hamiltonian (or Lagrangian) dynamical systems only. For bi-Hamiltonian system (ether) such a notion (as well as energy) does not exist. However after the Big Bang (in the first cycle) when Lagrangian fields and particles arisen physical temperature appears. In zero cycle ensemble of quanta is characterized by funda- mental parameter T which enters in Gibbs distribution function [1-3], where f f fTe /ε− ϕϕε = f f fourth compo- nent of 4-momentum of quantum (in connection with this formula we might call T as a non-physical “temperature” of quasi Lagrangian subsystem of bi- Hamiltonian system ). In the normal state mean size of quantum is determined by the relation (we use the system where fundamental con- stants ) is connected with maximal size of ensemble f )f,( f f f f 1== h f T/1=λ c fλ 2 f )0( maxR )0( /1f = 3/1)0( )fN /1= 2/3G λ f TG 3 fT ( G is gravitational con- stant) by means of formula , where is the number of quanta in ensemble. At the collapse of ensemble the size and size of quantum decrease so that the relation takes place (T stays constant like at the “isothermal” compression). It is important to em- phasize that Universe in zero cycle is collapsed because separate quanta (each individual field ) is con- structed in that point at which is attached: this is the main property of bi-Hamiltonian system (in general theory of dynamical systems such manifolds are called attractors). In zero cycle entropy of Universe is zero: (there are no interactions besides the gravita- tional one, therefore each quantum may be in one state only). And if Universe in this cycle to characterize by physical temperature, so it must be equal zero (“cold” cycle). 3/1))0( max )/( f R (xf 0( fN ) fλ R= f N /(R=λ 0=S f f First cycle. At compression of our ensemble size of each quantum will be, after all, equaled where is fundamental parameter (analogous of T ) by which condensed state of our system is character- ized. Hereby the size of ensemble in whole (Universe) is f ff T/1=λ fT f f ff TTGR /10( min f→ ) = f (T is negative magnitude). In this moment total quantum transition (irreversible con- fluence) is beginning. It is so called Big Bang. Hereby the energy f ff TT − f ≅T is secreted. It spends in main for the Universe space expansion. It is impor- tant to emphasize that the Universe expands because the process of pushing out of inner points of each spaceuscule xx, ( ))(), xf Π () xfx (f x takes place. Inside the spaceuscule some discontinuum (isomorphic to the Can- tor’s perfect manifold ) stays only (in general theory of dynamical systems such manifolds are called repel- ers). It is important to emphasize also that pushing out of spaceuscule points has pulsating character deter- mined by excitation spectrum of degenerate parameters of condensed state e (that is very strong degenerate one due to the switching on of interactions described by parameters . Interesting to note: in [4] vibrations of electromagnetic field Whittecker identifies with vibrations of space-idea underlined his ether the- ory). Einstein paid his attention on the paradox in cos- mology: (at small mass matter )(xχ )(iχ χ ))0( << 0(MM c η V <<= >> ) wave equations are getting relativistic theory (GR). However in Universe theory is non relativistic matter. Relative velocities in and connecting with them energies of motion are small in the suggested theory there are two kinds of motion: radial (total super relativ- istic) motion with velocity V and relative with . Total Universe energy ( cϕθ , cV << )0(Mη ) is hence dark energy, so paradox is explained. Thus quantum f may stands in many different states labeled and marked by different values of degeneration parameters . Quantity of such states cor- responding to one quantum (and also one fundamen- tal particle) usually calls as specific entropy and de- notes . We have to calculate this magnitude. In expo- ,...2 fiχ,1 ef, ef iχ χ f S PROBLEMS OF ATOMIC SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY. 2007, N 3 (1), p. 206-209. 206 nent phase is a usual Lagrangian field pulsa- tions of which have ultrarelativistic character. Density of such pulsations we denote . At the pure thermody- namic approach this magnitude depends on temperature like . Now we determine physical temperature by the formula T where a is some function of Universe radius (or time evolution t ). Then the specific entropy is written χie n =γ χ γn aη/ 3T T fT= )(R )0( 3)( fN TR = 3 S cρ )0( 3 f R VT= sR 3/ ≤ a4 f S =γ (SNS f 0( fNη f T 4== n n = U = V fT (s = T 4 f /4 f T= f = T fT ργ η 4/1/η a= fT US b p sR η equS = =equ (3 bη + R = R / S S N= γ a e p )(Rb )a N p (b− K ηγ = e+ N nγ (1) (obviously number of condensed states coincides with number of normal states and equals to number of fundamental particles in the Universe). Hereby for- mula for entropy of Universe in whole is written )0 , (2) where is volume of Universe. If, beginning from and (the end of the de-Sitter’s stage), Universe expansion would be adiabatic (Gamov hy- pothesis), so (because ). However [1-3], from obvious inequality where and it follows that = R R = 1) ) ργ /η η=const ρc 4 1 ≥a fT= )(Ra , i.e. at the end of de-Sitter’s stage temperature T , but not . Writing current radius of Universe in analogous form where (like ) is some func- tion of (or ) we get b t 3η (3) (here is the equilibrium specific entropy). Hence entropy of Universe in whole is , where is the number of photons (relic radiation) in Universe. It is essential that and depend on time evolution t by different man- ner, and therefore adiabatic condition ( b ) was ful- filled in past not always. Question about adiabatic re- gime of Universe expansion has been already discussed in literature [1-3]. One considers that this regime was set long after the Big Bang when temperature decreased lower than (ionization energy of H-atom), i.e. in atomic era. It is needed for this that the system “ “ had bound state and interaction (force) be- tween and e was potential. It is shown in [1-3] that these conditions took place not always. All depends on phase state of configuration space of Universe. There exist three phase states of space: Lebesgue’s continuum, Bohr’s compact and discontinuum [1-3]. Only in Lebes- gue’s continuum system “ ” has bound states (en- (energy binding ) and its angular momentum in it is not quantized) [1-3]. It turns out that at T (post de-Sitter’s stage) . Independent estimations of functions and [1-3] show that in the end of the de-Sitter’s stage ( ), hadron era ( ) lepton era ( ) and atomic era ( ) had the numerical values 0, 1/3, 2/3, 1 and was equaled to 1/4, 1/2, 3/4, 1. Consequently in these eras ratio has values . Entropy achieving its maximal value in atomic era holds this value at further expansion of Universe (so only after atomic era adiabatic regime takes place). Before atomic era Universe had lower entropy. With this fact lower en- tropy of Universe space is connected: after the de-Sitter’s stage configuration space was exist in the Bohr’s compact phase (see also [1-3]). The signs (relics) of that epoch conserved near to our time. In this epoch taking about one year special material structures characterized by lower entropy were arisen. The most interesting from them are, we consider, various forms of living matter [1-3]. η )a− 4000 )0( fN <ε b 10, 69 − )2/1(s )2 ( i s D D × ⊗ )2/ = )1( ))1( s i D D )1 1( ))1( )0( s s s D D D ⊗ ),0( K4000> )(3 ab−η S 4He )2(sSU⊗ i ⊗ ))2/1( ))2/1 ).1() )0()0( s s D D ⊗ ⊗ d ( ) ))2()1( )0()2( )0()1 ss s s D D D + ⊗ ⊗ .2,1, )2()0( sD⊗ ab ≠ aR b (1,3− η 4He ())2 ()) iD ⊗ × 1() D+ )1( )0( i sD ⊗ + )0( )0( )0( i i I D D ⊗ ⊗ )0 sD⊗ a sR a 10, /1( 2/1 (D ( D+ ⊗ ) D + = + (iD HR equ = ) )2(i ( s s D D × 0(i i D D= ) (( i i D D D + + 0=s iD LR 1(iD ( = /1(D ( + 0(iD ( + + 4He (2 iD / SS 1012 SU )2/1( )2/ ⊗ )0( ))1(s + 0( )1( ))1( s i D D × ) 10 =η D⊗ /1( 1(2/1 si D )(D× )1( )0 sD D+ sD ()1( )0( )1 i sD + ⊗ 1(D⊗ − ) 1 ⊗ ( ⊗ s 0 0 2. RELIC HELIUM Usually one considers that creation of cosmic is a result of nucleon-synthesis or nucleon-fusion [5]. We consider that cosmic appeared as a result of disintegration of super dense body of Universe at its expansion. Due to the quantum correlation between spin and isospin and switching on the strong interaction be- tween nucleons the bound conglomerates may remain but not only individual nucleons will be. Nucleon skele- ton (see [1-3]) is described by the representation of the group ( and are isotopic and usual spin indices; is the di- rect product). Two-particle conglomerates are described by the representation )2/ s ( (i D D (× is the Kronecker multiplication). As , so we have )2 ( i i D D Due to the Pauli exception principle only two latter terms are realizable in the Nature; hereby states correspond to the deuteron . Proceed- ing from these states we build four nucleons conglom- erates. They are described by the representation )⊗ 2 ( i i D D D )0 is an isosinglet with usual spin It is de- scribed by the representation and . At strong interaction switching on the latters correspond 207 to the bound states of four nucleons ( ). The rest are states of four nucleons without bound states. Number of possible states with isospin and usual spin is . Using this formula we get that the total number of states consisting of four nucleons is 36. Number of states for is 10. Ratio 10/36=0.27 gives the percentage of in the Universe. Cosmic observations give the same number [5]. 4He i s )12)(12( ++ si 4He 4He 0(0 000 ∫= XTP ∑ − ms s , 2 2()1( )(XDm + s ∫= d0 + m ∂ ∂ D t 2 2 0( ∑ = ms vac , ρ ∫ d 3)1  + m2p I sin)(θ )I)( 22 ppYI −= ),( 0 YYY = ),cos( Yp (XDm + ∫+± )12( ds 22 mp = −2 2 ) )pY + 2m [∑ ∫± ppd2 3 0=Y 2p=2)pY − 3. ENERGY OF PHYSICAL VACUUM Here a contribution of physical vacuum (zero vibra- tions of the Lagrangian particle fields) into energy of Universe is calculated. In quantized field theory energy of physical vacuum is determined by the expression ), 3Xdt , see [6], where T is the total energy-momentum tensor of all quantized fields and 0 is the state of physical vacuum. Magnitude may be expressed as the following sum µν 0P + t Xt i s 3),1)1 , (4) where is the Pauli-Jordan function of positive frequency, and m are spin and mass of particle. In the local theory (point-like particles) energy density of vacuum is given by the sum (see [6]) +± ps 22( , (5) where signs “+” and “–“are for bosons and fermions correspondingly. It is obviously infinite magnitude. However in the bilocal field theory (non-point, smear- ing particles [1-3]) particles have the space-time struc- ture described by the function I I where is the Heaviside function and are the inner space-time coordinates of par- ticle. In the case of physical vacuum these variables are free (see [1-3]; for massless particles structure function is ). For smearing particles the Pauli-Jordan function is given in [1-3]. Using this func- tion the expression for energy density of vacuum is written in the form of sum of integrals (,2Y θ ), Y − 22 22 23 ( (sin YppY Yp pp , (6) (here we took into account that for free particles ; for massless particles we have the sum ]pYcos ( vacρ because there are only two chiral states). We else may choose the system in which and therefore . In result the expression for is the sum of terms 2 0 22 YYp ,)()(4)12( sin )12( 02204 0 0 0223 mYKmY Y s Yp Yp mppds π += ++± ∫ ∓ (7) where is the Macdonald’s function. So for bosons is a negative magnitude and for fermions it is a positive one. At the limit of small this gives (at m when the structure function is we have ). In another limit we have . To estimate the numerical value of we resort to the following consideration. So far as at the Universe expansion the ratio where is a free length and is radius of the Universe) is invariant (see above) so we have to consider that Y . Obviously the physical vacuum appeared together with particle appearance after the so called de-Sitter’s stage when the radius of the Uni- verse has been . At this stage had the minimal value equaled to the funda- mental “length” 1 . At the Lebesgue phase (space for elementary particles is always the Lebesgue one) and hence 2K 8)1+ {pY ∞→ λ/R 0Y skR/ vacρ 2( s∓ cos 0mY RY0 = 0mY R R 13/5 ff T 4 0/Yπ } 0 R 0= 48∓ 2/3 em − vacρ 32/7 hc 4 0/Yπ 5 0/0 YmY /12/ / G 2/ R 2T λ ~ s = k/ 3/ . 4)12( 2 24 4       ×            += ∑ s ms s svac hkR mcRK hkR mcR R Rhcks πρ ∓ (8) At small masses ( ) and (just after the de-Sitter’s stage) we have Gevkhcmc 1~2 << sRR ~ ./)12( 8)12(8)12( 4 4 4 4 4 cTs T Thcks R Rhcks vac f s σ ππ +=         +=     + ∓ ∓∓ (9) Here the condition is used (see above), and T (see above). From this it follows that for nucleon vacuum (that is compatible with the den- sity of nuclear matter). Nowadays and hence for nu- cleon vacuum that is, of course, negligible small magni- tude. More over at we have the strict equality because there are two neutrinos with chiralities 1/2 and two states of photon with chirali- ties 1. Note that charge and spin densities of physical vacuum are strictly zero because integrals fsTRRT = f 10~ ~ evac −ρ 0= 0 424 /8 fvac Thckπσ = 345 /10~ cmeVvacρ 1810~/ sRR =+= vac B vac F vac ρρρ eV15 1018 eV cmR 2710~ , 3/ cm m ∫ = 0 sin 0 03 Yp Yp pd and ∫ cos3 ppd = 00Y . 208 REFERENCES 1. S.S. Sannikov-Proskuryakov. About cosmological aspects of relativistic bi-Hamiltonian system //Russian Physics Journal. 1995, v. 2, p. 106-115. 2. S.S. Sannikov-Proskuryakov. Cosmology and a Living Cell //Russian Physics Journal. 2004, v. 47, p. 500-511. 3. S.S. Sannikov-Proskuryakov. About strong inter- action of fundamental particles //Ukr. Journ. of Phys. 2002, v. 47, p. 615-628. 4. E. Whittecker. History of the theory of electro- magnetism and ether. M.: “MATHESIS”, 2001, р. 125 (in Russian). 5. S. Weinberg. Gravitation and cosmology. M.: “Mir”, 1975, p. 696 (in Russian). 6. N.N. Bogolubov, D.V. Shirkov. The introduction to the theory of quantized fields. M.: “Nauka”, 1973, р. 38 (in Russian). НЕКОТОРЫЕ ПРОБЛЕМЫ В ТЕОРИИ ЭВОЛЮЦИИ РАННЕЙ ВСЕЛЕННОЙ С.С. Санников-Проскуряков Продолжаем рассмотрение физических характеристик ранней Вселенной. Сосредотачиваем внимание здесь на трех вопросах: термодинамика, реликтовый гелий, энергия физического вакуума. ДЕЯКІ ПРОБЛЕМИ У ТЕОРІЇ ЕВОЛЮЦІЇ РАННЬОГО ВСЕСВІТУ С.С. Санников-Проскуряков Продовжуємо розгляд фізичних характеристик раннього Всесвіту. Зосереджуємо увагу тут на трьох питаннях: термодинаміка, реліктовий гелій, енергія фізичного вакууму. 209
id nasplib_isofts_kiev_ua-123456789-110955
institution Digital Library of Periodicals of National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine
issn 1562-6016
language English
last_indexed 2025-12-07T17:09:34Z
publishDate 2007
publisher Національний науковий центр «Харківський фізико-технічний інститут» НАН України
record_format dspace
spelling Sannikov-Proskuryakov, S.S.
2017-01-07T14:22:46Z
2017-01-07T14:22:46Z
2007
Some problems in the theory of early universe evolution / S.S. Sannikov-Proskuryakov // Вопросы атомной науки и техники. — 2007. — № 3. — С. 206-209. — Бібліогр.: 6 назв. — англ.
1562-6016
PACS: 98.80.Cq, 98.80.Bp, 05.70.–a, 65.40.Gr , 05.70.Jk
https://nasplib.isofts.kiev.ua/handle/123456789/110955
We continue consideration of physical characteristics of early Universe. Here our attention is concentrated on the three topics: thermodynamics, relic helium, energy of physical vacuum.
Продовжуємо розгляд фізичних характеристик раннього Всесвіту. Зосереджуємо нашу увагу тут на трьох питаннях: термодинаміка, реліктовий гелій, енергія фізичного вакууму.
Продолжаем рассмотрение физических характеристик ранней Вселенной. Сосредотачиваем наше внимание здесь на трех вопросах: термодинамика, реликтовый гелий, энергия физического вакуума
en
Національний науковий центр «Харківський фізико-технічний інститут» НАН України
Вопросы атомной науки и техники
QED processes in strong fields
Some problems in the theory of early universe evolution
Деякі проблеми у теорії еволюції раннього всесвіту
Некоторые проблемы в теории эволюции ранней вселенной
Article
published earlier
spellingShingle Some problems in the theory of early universe evolution
Sannikov-Proskuryakov, S.S.
QED processes in strong fields
title Some problems in the theory of early universe evolution
title_alt Деякі проблеми у теорії еволюції раннього всесвіту
Некоторые проблемы в теории эволюции ранней вселенной
title_full Some problems in the theory of early universe evolution
title_fullStr Some problems in the theory of early universe evolution
title_full_unstemmed Some problems in the theory of early universe evolution
title_short Some problems in the theory of early universe evolution
title_sort some problems in the theory of early universe evolution
topic QED processes in strong fields
topic_facet QED processes in strong fields
url https://nasplib.isofts.kiev.ua/handle/123456789/110955
work_keys_str_mv AT sannikovproskuryakovss someproblemsinthetheoryofearlyuniverseevolution
AT sannikovproskuryakovss deâkíproblemiuteorííevolûcíírannʹogovsesvítu
AT sannikovproskuryakovss nekotoryeproblemyvteoriiévolûciiranneivselennoi