A conceptual design of a MeV-energy ion microprobe with an immersion probe-forming system

The authors propose a new design for a MeV-energy ion microprobe based on the immersion probe-forming system that employs the accelerating tube at an early stage of beam focusing. The final probing beam formation on the target is provided by a separated Russian quadruplet of magnetic quadrupole lens...

Повний опис

Збережено в:
Бібліографічні деталі
Опубліковано в: :Вопросы атомной науки и техники
Дата:2003
Автори: Ponomarev, A.G., Ignat’ev, I.G., Magilin, D.V., Miroshnichenko, V.I., Storizhko, V.E.
Формат: Стаття
Мова:Англійська
Опубліковано: Національний науковий центр «Харківський фізико-технічний інститут» НАН України 2003
Теми:
Онлайн доступ:https://nasplib.isofts.kiev.ua/handle/123456789/111237
Теги: Додати тег
Немає тегів, Будьте першим, хто поставить тег для цього запису!
Назва журналу:Digital Library of Periodicals of National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine
Цитувати:A conceptual design of a MeV-energy ion microprobe with an immersion probe-forming system / A.G. Ponomarev, I.G. Ignat’ev, D.V. Magilin, V.I. Miroshnichenko, V.E. Storizhko // Вопросы атомной науки и техники. — 2003. — № 4. — С. 305-308. — Бібліогр.: 14 назв. — англ.

Репозитарії

Digital Library of Periodicals of National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine
_version_ 1859895360201162752
author Ponomarev, A.G.
Ignat’ev, I.G.
Magilin, D.V.
Miroshnichenko, V.I.
Storizhko, V.E.
author_facet Ponomarev, A.G.
Ignat’ev, I.G.
Magilin, D.V.
Miroshnichenko, V.I.
Storizhko, V.E.
citation_txt A conceptual design of a MeV-energy ion microprobe with an immersion probe-forming system / A.G. Ponomarev, I.G. Ignat’ev, D.V. Magilin, V.I. Miroshnichenko, V.E. Storizhko // Вопросы атомной науки и техники. — 2003. — № 4. — С. 305-308. — Бібліогр.: 14 назв. — англ.
collection DSpace DC
container_title Вопросы атомной науки и техники
description The authors propose a new design for a MeV-energy ion microprobe based on the immersion probe-forming system that employs the accelerating tube at an early stage of beam focusing. The final probing beam formation on the target is provided by a separated Russian quadruplet of magnetic quadrupole lenses. As follows from the calculations, the length of this setup along the beamline (from the ion source to the target) does not exceed 4 m, but the resolution may be higher than that of most operating facilities of conventional design.
first_indexed 2025-12-07T15:55:10Z
format Article
fulltext УДК 539.1.078 A CONCEPTUAL DESIGN OF A MeV-ENERGY ION MICROPROBE WITH AN IMMERSION PROBE-FORMING SYSTEM A.G.Ponomarev, I.G.Ignat’ev, D.V.Magilin, V.I.Miroshnichenko, V.E.Storizhko Istitute of Applied Physics, National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine, Petropavlovskay St. 58, 40030 Sumy, Ukraine, ponom@ipfcenter.sumy.ua, Fax: +380-452-223760; B.Sulkio-Cleff Institute of Nuclear Physics, University of Münster, Müster, Germany The authors propose a new design for a MeV-energy ion microprobe based on the immersion probe-forming sys- tem that employs the accelerating tube at an early stage of beam focusing. The final probing beam formation on the target is provided by a separated Russian quadruplet of magnetic quadrupole lenses. As follows from the calcula- tions, the length of this setup along the beamline (from the ion source to the target) does not exceed 4 m, but the res- olution may be higher than that of most operating facilities of conventional design. 1. INTRODUCTION Most present-day ion microprobes of MeV-energies are based on accelerators originally intended for use in nuclear physics research, and hence, are rather bulky [1]. In spite of a growing interest in microprobe applica- tions to diverse research and technology problems, mi- croprobe facilities that are in operation world-wide are still not numerous. The primary reasons are that they have large size, high cost and high power consumption, and are not simple to operate. In this context, to design a compact microprobe of MeV energies would mean to decrease considerably the cost and power consumption, on the one hand, and to increase the resolution, on the other, thus making a breakthrough in microprobe applications. At the Institute of Applied Physics (IAP), National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine, works have been start- ed to develop small-size MeV-energy microprobes with immersion probe-forming systems. A principal distinc- tion of the novel microprobe design from the traditional one is that the components of the probe-forming system are placed along the accelerator beam line, with the ob- ject and the angular collimators positioned in front of the accelerating tube. The use of HVEE precision accelera- tors and a dedicated ion injector with high brightness and ion mass separation which is under development at IAP [2-4], makes it possible to dispense with a magnetic ana- lyzer at the accelerator exit, leading to a further reduction in size and cost of microprobe facilities. This paper proposes a new design for a MeV-energy ion microprobe based on an immersion probe-forming system where the accelerating tube is used at a early stage of beam focusing. The final probing beam forma- tion at the target is provided by a separated Russian quadruplet of magnetic quadrupole lenses. 2. BASIC PRINCIPLES AND DESCRIPTION OF THE IMMERSION PROBE FORMING SYSTEM A section of the ion-optic axis where the beam is ex- posed to electromagnetic fields is less than 15% of the overall system length (from the ion source to the target) in some conventional facilities. Therefore a principal re- duction in size in a new microprobe arrangement can be achieved by drastically shortening the drift spaces. Another aspect of the new arrangement is the role of a magnetic analyzer. In conventional accelerator-based facilities a magnetic analyzer is placed behind the accel- erator to stabilize the ion beam and separate the desired ion species. At the same time, the ion beam energy of several MeV leads to a larger magnet size and fairly high magnetic induction in the beam transport area, in- volving greater energy consumption. As was reported in [5], the use of an analyzing magnet for the beam energy stabilization in a SINGLETRONTM accelerator of new type provides the energy spread ∆E/E≈10-5, while a Generating Voltmeter (GVM) gives ∆E/E≈10-4. Our ear- lier investigations [6] show that in magnetic quadrupole probe-forming systems permitting submicron beam spot size to be achieved for the energy spread ∆E/E≈10-4, the main contribution to the beam broadening is made by intrinsic 3rd-order aberrations and parasitic 2nd and 3rd-order aberrations that are due to parasitic sextupole and octupole components of the lens field. Therefore positioning a magnetic analyzer behind the ion source and using a Wien filter or some other compact mass an- alyzer, it is possible to reduce both the dimensions of the analyzer itself and power expended in separating the desired ion species. GVM installed in the stabilizing unit would allow a sufficient energy spread with which chromatic aberrations can be neglected. The arrangement proposed for an ion microprobe of new type is shown in Fig.1. In this design use can be made of HVEE accelerators [5, 7]. Placed behind an ion source is a mass analyzer, an object- and an angular col- limators. The beam collimation is performed ahead of the accelerating structure, permitting for a current I∼ 100 pA a significant reduction in the radiation load on the accelerating tube. Moreover, there is no need for a conventional magnetic analyzer, which paves the way for advanced ion sources with low current and high brightness. Behind the accelerating tube there is a major focusing system based on magnetic quadrupole lenses with variable power supply, a scanning system and a target chamber. mailto:ponom@ipfcenter.sumy.ua Fig.1. Schematic of a proposed novel microprobe 1 – ion source; 2 – mass analyzer; 3 – object collimator; 4 – angular collimator; 5 – accelerating tube; 6– separated “Russian quadruplet” of magnetic quadrupole lenses; 7 – scanning system; 8 – target chamber; 9 – high-voltage terminal; 10 – high-pressure vessel 3. CALCULATIONS FOR THE IMMERSION PROBE-FORMING SYSTEM As is seen in Fig. 1, the accelerating tube is involved in the probe formation. Optimization calculations for the immersion probe-forming system were carried out in- cluding chromatic and 3 rd-order intrinsic spherical aberrations. Linear properties of the probe-forming were determined using a numerical PROBFORM code based on principles set forth in [8]. Aberrations were estimat- ed by means of a matrix method (matrizant method) [9] underlying the MBTOOLS code [10]. The electrostatic potential distribution together with its first four deriva- tives on the accelerating tube axis was calculated with the help of a numerical LAPLACE-2 code [10]. Fig. 2 shows a beam envelope including aberrations and a cal- culated ion-optic configuration. A figure of merit for the immersion probe-forming system was found by the highest emittance technique with a numerical MaxBE- mit code [11]. A comparison was made with operating facilities whose performance data were reported in [12, 13] (see Table 1). Fig.2 (a) beam envelope including aberrations; (b) calculated ion-optic configuration Table 1. A Comparison Between Design Parameters of Selected Microprobe Facilities S1 system Im- mersion probe forming system S2 system Rus- sian quadruplet (short version) Cracow [12] S3 system Triplet Oxford [13] S4 system CSIRO-GEMOS quintuplet [13] System length [cm] 308 230 (only PFS) 740 (only PFS) 470 (only PFS) Pole field [T] B1 B2 0.35282 0.13806 0.30073 0.20843 0.19715 0.22058 0.05654 0.22058 Object distance, a [cm] 30 118 682.4 299.5 Demagnification Dx Dy -114.2 -114.2 17.7 17.7 92 -26 -65 69 Chromatic aber- rations [µ m/mrad/%] Cpx 173 -293(-295) -343(-345) 1195 (1198) Cpy 43 -73 (-74) 873 (878) -98 (-103) Spherical aberra- tions [µm/mrad3] <x/θ3> -51 175 (166) 426 (360) -2933 (-3320) <x/θφ2> -17 27 (39) 207 (496) -226 (-478) <y/φ3> -2 6 (5) -2197(-1855) 43 (38) <y/θ2φ> -17 27 (39) -743 (-774) 212 (451) Beam spot size 500 nm, E=2MeV Object collimator size [µm] 2*rx 2*ry 47.8 41.4 5.4 6.0 30.8 6.6 21.8 23.6 Maximum nor- malized emittance ε̂ [µm2mrad2MeV] 2.82 1.93 1.27 4.4 4. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION The immersion PFS (S1 system) is compared with microprobe facilities already in operation in Cracow [12] (S2 system), Oxford [13] (S3 system), and Sydney [13] (S4 system) which are based on different version of quadrupole lens configurations: a high excitation triplet (Oxford), a separated Russian quadruplet (short version, Cracow), and a high-excitation quintuplet (CSIRO- GEMOS, Sydney). The calculations were performed for chromatic and 3 rd-order intrinsic aberrations using a MBTOOLS code. Our results presented in Table 1, in brackets, indicate that the differences in the highest aberration values are less than 15% as compared with published data for the above facilities tabulated in Table 1, columns 2, 3, and 4, not enclosed in brackets. It is worth noting that the S1 system has demagnifi- cation coefficients well above those of the S2, S3, and S4 systems for smaller aberrations. Of great importance is the choice of a criterion for comparison between different systems. In [11] the au- thors propose to use as a figure of merit the highest emittance, ε , of a beam that can be transformed by the given PFS into a spot of required size. The normalized emittance E⋅= εε̂ where E is the beam energy, for known normalized beam brightnesses, b̂ , determines the post-collimation beam current value bI ˆˆ ⋅= ε . Assuming that the normalized beam brightness and energy at the target (E=2 MeV) are similar for all sys- tems in question and bearing in mind that for the S1 sys- tem the beam energy at the object collimator entrance was taken to be 0.02 MeV, we may declare the follow- ing. The beam current in the case of the beam transport to the target without any losses, for the S1 system would be a factor of 1.5 and 2 greater than that for the S2 - and the S3 system, respectively, but a factor of 1.5 less com- pared to the S4 system. The latter can be attributed to the fact that in the S4 system the working distance g=8.5 cm. This, however, does not permit a scanning system to be placed behind the lenses, which because of the lens aberrations limits the scanned area. The S1, S2, and S3 systems have g=15 cm resulting in decreased emittance [10], but at the same time they have enough space to accommodate the scanning system. 5. CONCLUSIONS A proposed new design of a small-size ion micro- probe of MeV energies has the overall length of ∼ 4 m, permitting a horizontal microprobe version of “desk” type or a vertical one of “tower” type to be created. The advantages of this design over conventional micro- probes are small dimensions, low energy consumption, reduced vibrations, lower cost, and possibilities of using advanced ion sources. By reducing the number of ion- optics elements along the beam path from the ion source to the object collimator, it is possible to decrease the degradation of beam brightness. The implementation of the above concept would re- quire modifications in the accelerator design, e.g. a high- pressure vessel of shell type for easier accelerator mainte- nance, as well as a greater manufacture accuracy. The authors acknowledge the assistance of Dr. S.M. Yudina with the preparation of this paper for publica- tion. This work is supported by Ministry of Education and Science of the Ukraine Project N2M71-2001 and BMBF/Berlin (Germany), Project UKR 00/003. REFERENCES 1. G.J.F. Legge // Nucl. Instr. and Meth. 1997, v.B130, №9. 2. С.А. Кузема, С.Н. Мордик // ЖТФ. 2001, т.71, вып.11, с.124. 3. 4. S.N. Mordik, A.G. Ponomarev // Nucl. Instr. and Meth. 2002, v. A480, №359. 5. V.I. Miroshnichenko, S.N. Mordik, V.V. Olshansky et al. // Nucl. Instr. and Meth. 2003, v. B201. 6. D.J.W. Mous, R.G. Haitsma, T. Butz et al. // Nucl. Instr. and Meth. 1997, v. B130, №31. 7. V.A. Brazhnik, V.I. Miroshnichenko, A.G. Pono- marev, V.E. Storizhko // Nucl. Instr. and Meth. 2001, v. B174, №385. 8. K. Jimbo, Y. Katoh, A. Kohyama // Nucl. Instr. and Meth. 2002, v. A448, №466. 9. V.A. Brazhnik, S.A. Lebed, V.I.Miroshnichenko et al. // Nucl. Instr. and Meth. 2000, v. B171, №558. 10. A. Dymnikov, R. Hellborg // Nucl. Instr. and Meth. 1993, v. A330, №323. 11. A.G. Ponomarev, K.I. Melnik, V.I. Miroshnichenko et al. // Nucl. Instr. and Meth. 2003, v. B201, №637. 12. A.G. Ponomarev, V.I. Miroshnichenko, V.E. Storizhko. Optimum Collimator Shape and Maximum Emittance for Submicron Focusing of Ion Beams. Determination of the Probe-Forming System Resolution Limit // Press in Nucl. Instr. and Meth. A. 13. V. Brazhnik, S. Lebed, W. Kwiatek et al. // Nucl. Instr. and Meth. 1997, v. B130, №104. 14. C.G. Ryan, D.N. Jamieson // Nucl. Instr. and Meth. 1999, v. B158, №97. A.G.Ponomarev, I.G.Ignat’ev, D.V.Magilin, V.I.Miroshnichenko, V.E.Storizhko Institute of Nuclear Physics, University of Münster, Müster, Germany .
id nasplib_isofts_kiev_ua-123456789-111237
institution Digital Library of Periodicals of National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine
issn 1562-6016
language English
last_indexed 2025-12-07T15:55:10Z
publishDate 2003
publisher Національний науковий центр «Харківський фізико-технічний інститут» НАН України
record_format dspace
spelling Ponomarev, A.G.
Ignat’ev, I.G.
Magilin, D.V.
Miroshnichenko, V.I.
Storizhko, V.E.
2017-01-08T20:34:10Z
2017-01-08T20:34:10Z
2003
A conceptual design of a MeV-energy ion microprobe with an immersion probe-forming system / A.G. Ponomarev, I.G. Ignat’ev, D.V. Magilin, V.I. Miroshnichenko, V.E. Storizhko // Вопросы атомной науки и техники. — 2003. — № 4. — С. 305-308. — Бібліогр.: 14 назв. — англ.
1562-6016
https://nasplib.isofts.kiev.ua/handle/123456789/111237
539.1.078
The authors propose a new design for a MeV-energy ion microprobe based on the immersion probe-forming system that employs the accelerating tube at an early stage of beam focusing. The final probing beam formation on the target is provided by a separated Russian quadruplet of magnetic quadrupole lenses. As follows from the calculations, the length of this setup along the beamline (from the ion source to the target) does not exceed 4 m, but the resolution may be higher than that of most operating facilities of conventional design.
The authors acknowledge the assistance of Dr. S.M. Yudina with the preparation of this paper for publication. This work is supported by Ministry of Education and Science of the Ukraine Project N2M71-2001 and BMBF/Berlin (Germany), Project UKR 00/003.
en
Національний науковий центр «Харківський фізико-технічний інститут» НАН України
Вопросы атомной науки и техники
Приложения и технологии
A conceptual design of a MeV-energy ion microprobe with an immersion probe-forming system
Article
published earlier
spellingShingle A conceptual design of a MeV-energy ion microprobe with an immersion probe-forming system
Ponomarev, A.G.
Ignat’ev, I.G.
Magilin, D.V.
Miroshnichenko, V.I.
Storizhko, V.E.
Приложения и технологии
title A conceptual design of a MeV-energy ion microprobe with an immersion probe-forming system
title_full A conceptual design of a MeV-energy ion microprobe with an immersion probe-forming system
title_fullStr A conceptual design of a MeV-energy ion microprobe with an immersion probe-forming system
title_full_unstemmed A conceptual design of a MeV-energy ion microprobe with an immersion probe-forming system
title_short A conceptual design of a MeV-energy ion microprobe with an immersion probe-forming system
title_sort conceptual design of a mev-energy ion microprobe with an immersion probe-forming system
topic Приложения и технологии
topic_facet Приложения и технологии
url https://nasplib.isofts.kiev.ua/handle/123456789/111237
work_keys_str_mv AT ponomarevag aconceptualdesignofamevenergyionmicroprobewithanimmersionprobeformingsystem
AT ignatevig aconceptualdesignofamevenergyionmicroprobewithanimmersionprobeformingsystem
AT magilindv aconceptualdesignofamevenergyionmicroprobewithanimmersionprobeformingsystem
AT miroshnichenkovi aconceptualdesignofamevenergyionmicroprobewithanimmersionprobeformingsystem
AT storizhkove aconceptualdesignofamevenergyionmicroprobewithanimmersionprobeformingsystem
AT ponomarevag conceptualdesignofamevenergyionmicroprobewithanimmersionprobeformingsystem
AT ignatevig conceptualdesignofamevenergyionmicroprobewithanimmersionprobeformingsystem
AT magilindv conceptualdesignofamevenergyionmicroprobewithanimmersionprobeformingsystem
AT miroshnichenkovi conceptualdesignofamevenergyionmicroprobewithanimmersionprobeformingsystem
AT storizhkove conceptualdesignofamevenergyionmicroprobewithanimmersionprobeformingsystem