Ion beam acceleration in system from periodic sequence of independetly phased cavities

Ion superconducting linac is based on periodic system consisting of the identical niobium cavities. By specific
 phasing of the RF cavities one can provide a stable particle motion in the whole accelerator. In this paper the beam
 stability conditions are founded. The matrix calculat...

Повний опис

Збережено в:
Бібліографічні деталі
Опубліковано в: :Вопросы атомной науки и техники
Дата:2008
Автори: Masunov, E.S., Samoshin, A.V.
Формат: Стаття
Мова:Англійська
Опубліковано: Національний науковий центр «Харківський фізико-технічний інститут» НАН України 2008
Теми:
Онлайн доступ:https://nasplib.isofts.kiev.ua/handle/123456789/111403
Теги: Додати тег
Немає тегів, Будьте першим, хто поставить тег для цього запису!
Назва журналу:Digital Library of Periodicals of National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine
Цитувати:Ion beam acceleration in system from periodic sequence of independetly phased cavities / E.S. Masunov, A.V. Samoshin // Вопросы атомной науки и техники. — 2008. — № 3. — С. 158-162. — Бібліогр.: 8 назв. — англ.

Репозитарії

Digital Library of Periodicals of National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine
_version_ 1859993538298642432
author Masunov, E.S.
Samoshin, A.V.
author_facet Masunov, E.S.
Samoshin, A.V.
citation_txt Ion beam acceleration in system from periodic sequence of independetly phased cavities / E.S. Masunov, A.V. Samoshin // Вопросы атомной науки и техники. — 2008. — № 3. — С. 158-162. — Бібліогр.: 8 назв. — англ.
collection DSpace DC
container_title Вопросы атомной науки и техники
description Ion superconducting linac is based on periodic system consisting of the identical niobium cavities. By specific
 phasing of the RF cavities one can provide a stable particle motion in the whole accelerator. In this paper the beam
 stability conditions are founded. The matrix calculation and motion equation in the smooth approximation are used
 for alternating phase focusing analysis in superconducting linac. Надпровідний лінійний прискорювач іонів заснований на використанні періодичної системи, що складається з ідентичних ніобієвих резонаторів. За допомогою спеціального фазування ВЧ-резонаторів можна забезпечити стійкий рух часток у всьому прискорювачі. У статті знайдено умови стійкості руху пучка іонів. Для аналізу фазозмінного фокусування пучка у надпровідному прискорювачі використано матричний метод розрахунку і рівняння руху у гладкому наближенні. Сверхпроводящий линейный ускоритель ионов основан на использовании периодической системы, состоящей из идентичных ниобиевых резонаторов. Посредством специального фазирования ВЧ-резонаторов можно обеспечить устойчивое движение частиц во всем ускорителе. В этой статье найдены условия устойчивости движения пучка ионов. Матричный метод расчета и уравнение движения в гладком приближении используются для анализа фазопеременной фокусировки пучка в сверхпроводящем ускорителе.
first_indexed 2025-12-07T16:33:15Z
format Article
fulltext ____________________________________________________________ PROBLEMS OF ATOMIC SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY. 2008. № 3. Series: Nuclear Physics Investigations (49), p.158-162. 158 ION BEAM ACCELERATION IN SYSTEM FROM PERIODIC SEQUENCE OF INDEPENDETLY PHASED CAVITIES E.S. Masunov, A.V. Samoshin Moscow Engineering Physics Institute (State University), Moscow, 115409, Russia E-mail: ESMasunov@mephi.ru Ion superconducting linac is based on periodic system consisting of the identical niobium cavities. By specific phasing of the RF cavities one can provide a stable particle motion in the whole accelerator. In this paper the beam stability conditions are founded. The matrix calculation and motion equation in the smooth approximation are used for alternating phase focusing analysis in superconducting linac. PACS: 29.27.-A, 29.27.Bd 1. INTRODUCTION Ion superconducting linac is usually based on the superconducting (SC) interdigital cavities. This linac consists of the niobium cavities which can provide typi- cally 1 MV of accelerating potential per cavity. Such structures can be used for ion acceleration with different mass-charge ratio in the low energy region [1] and for proton linac in the high-energy region (SNS, JHF, ESS project). It is desirable to have a constant geometry of the accelerating cavity in order to simplify manufactur- ing. Such geometry leads to a non-synchronism but a stable longitudinal particle motion can be provided by proper phasing of the RF cavities. The ions are accele- rated and slipping relative to the RF wave in depen- dence of the ratio between the particle velocity β and the phase velocity of the wave βG. The geometrical ve- locity βG of the RF wave is constant for cavities. The geometric size of a cavity and a wave velocity βG must be changed step by step from one class to other class. The optimum number of cavity in each class determines the number of classes in SC linac. The identical cavities operate at the some initial drive phase φ. By controlling the driven phase of the accelerating structure and the distance between the cavities, the beam can be both lon- gitudinally stable and accelerated in the whole system. In this paper two methods of the beam dynamics inves- tigation are compared for low ion velocities and for the charge-to-mass ratio Z/A = 1/66. This comparison can be demonstrated with an example a post-accelerator of radioactive ion beams (RIB) linac, where beam velocity increases from β = 0.01 to β = 0.06 [1]. Beam focusing can be provided with help of SC so- lenoid lenses, following each cavity and with help of special RF fields. A schematic plot of one period of the accelerator structure is shown in Fig.1. The low-charge- state beams and the low velocity require stronger trans- verse focusing than one is used in existing SC ion linac. The large radial variation of the axial accelerating field induces a beam energy spread, which will accumulate as the beam passes through successive resonators. Early investigation of beam dynamics shown that for the ini- tial normalized transverse emittance εT = 0.1π⋅mm⋅mrad and the longitudinal emittance εV = 0.3π⋅keV/u⋅nsec the connection between the longitudinal and transverse mo- tion can be neglected if maximum beam envelop Xm < 3-4 mm and inner radius of accelerating drift tubes a = 15 mm. 2. BEAM STABILITY ANALISYS BY TRANSFER MATRICES The general axisymmetric equations of motion for ion moving inside an accelerator can be written as ( ) ( )( ) .2 γ2 2 ββ1, d dγ d d ,2 γ2 2 , d dγ d d ϕ ϕ A rm q GtrrqE t rm t A zm qtrzqE t zm t ∂ ∂ −−= ∂ ∂ −= ⎟ ⎠ ⎞⎜ ⎝ ⎛ ⎟ ⎠ ⎞⎜ ⎝ ⎛ r r . (1) In every cavity the acceleration RF field of periodic H-cavity is represented as an expansion in spatial har- monics ( ) ( )( ) ( ) ( ) ( )( ) ( ) ⎪⎭ ⎪ ⎬ ⎫ −= −= ∑ ∑ tzzhrhEE tzzhrhEE innr innz ωcossinI ωcoscosI 10 00 , (2) where E0 is amplitude of RF field at the axis (E0 ≠ 0 if –Lr/2 < z–zi < Lr/2), hn = π/D + 2πn/D, n = 0, 1, 2, …, D is the period length of the cavity, Lr is the cavity length, zi is the coordinate of the i-th cavity center. I0, I1 are modified Bessel function. In our case the reference particle velocity βc and the geometrical velocity βG are closely in each class of the identical cavities. Retaining in (2) only zeroth harmonic we can use the traveling wave system. In this system ωt can be replaced by h0(z–zi) + φ0i, where φ0i is the RF phase when the refer- ence particle traverses the cavity center. In equation (1) the value Aφ is the azimuthal vector-potential of the magnetic field in every solenoid (B = rotA). Fig.1. Layout of structure period 2.1. SOLENOID FOCUSING From the motion equations (1) it can find the cavity, solenoid and drift space matrices Mres, Msol and Mdr, if RF field and magnetic field amplitudes are approx- imated by the step function [2]. The transfer matrix for one period, Mz and Mr, are obtained by multiplying these matrices. The transfer matrices Mz and Mr allow to find the phase advances per period: 159 ( )11 22 1μ arccos , 2z z zM M⎛ ⎞= +⎜ ⎟ ⎝ ⎠ (3) ( )11 22 1μ arccos . 2r r rM M⎛ ⎞= +⎜ ⎟ ⎝ ⎠ (4) The longitudinal and transverse beam dynamics are sta- ble if 1μcos ≤z , 1μcos ≤r . (5) From these inequalities it can compute the necessary magnetic field value В for a considered interval of beam velocity 0.01 ≤ β ≤ 0.06. The choice of μz and μr is li- mited by the bunch size. In our case, the solenoid mag- netic field B determines μr, the beta function and the extreme values of the beam envelope. For a charge-to- mass ratio Z/A = 1/66 and beam velocity range 0.01 < βc < 0.02 a proper focusing can be reached with magnetic fields up to 15 T, if μr < 250. For beam veloci- ties between 0.05 − 0.06c, the solenoid magnetic field B must be increased to obtain μr ≈ 250. The final choice of the focusing magnetic field and the parameter μr can be made if the normalized trans- verse emittance Vr and maximum size of beam envelope Xm are fixed. In our case ⎟⎟ ⎠ ⎞ ⎜⎜ ⎝ ⎛ = 2 12 βγ arcsinμ m rr r X MV , (6) where Mr12 is non-diagonal element of the transfer ma- trix. We can find the value of the focusing magnetic field Bmin as function of the ion velocity β if the envelop Xm is the constant along the linac. The system of two equations (4) and (6) can be solved for Xm = const in the accelerator structure which consists of the periodic se- quence of the solenoids and the resonators. For the acce- leration phase φc=−20°, when the beam velocity in- creases from 0.01 to 0.06, the functions Bmin(β) decreas- es from 16 T to 10.5 T if the beam envelop Xm = 3 mm and from 14 T to 8 T if Xm = 4 mm. Fig.2. The beam stability area for different values of B It is interesting to investigate the common stability area for longitudinal and transverse dynamics on the plane of variables α and φ, where the interaction para- meter α = LŪ/4Lv, Ū = qU/mic2 is a dimensionless am- plitude of accelerating potential per cavity, mi = Amp, Lv = λβ3γ3/2π, L = Lres + 2Ld + Lsol is a period length, φc is reference particle phase. The borders of stability area between μz = 0 and μr = 0 are shown in Fig.2 for differ- ent values of magnetic field B, when Lr/L = 1/4. In our case the longitudinal dynamics is stable only if φc < 0. For B = 0 and φc < 0 the radial dynamics is instability. In this case the common area of beam stability is absent. This area appears and extends when magnetic field B increases. The minimum value of focusing field Bmin can be founded from the condition μr = 0. It’s value depends on α and φc. When the beam velocity βc increases the value of interaction parameter α (defocusing factor) quickly decreases (α ~ 1/βc 3). In this case the magnetic field B can be smaller for the same φc. 2.2. APF AND SOLENOID FOCUSING The RF defocusing factor and required solenoid field are very large in the SC resonators. Another method of RF focusing is the alternating phase focusing (APF) [3]. Using transfer matrix calculations, we can study an al- ternating phase focusing structure in the superconduct- ing linac by changing the sign of the reference phase value at each cavity [2]. Let’s consider a simple case of the focusing period containing two SC cavities. By ad- justing the phases ϕ1 and ϕ2 of each cavity individually, we can provide both acceleration and focusing. The phase advances per period, μz and μr, can be found from two transfer matrices Mz and Mr. a) b) c) Fig.3. The beam stability area for APF The borders of common stability area between μz = 0 and μr = 0 are shown in Fig.3 by black lines for deferent values of α, when Lr/L = 1/4. In this figure the new no- tations ϕc and Δ are used instead of ϕ1,2 = ϕc ± Δ. For the charge-to-mass ratio Z/A = 1/66 the parameter α ≈ 1, when the beam velocity 0.01< βc < 0.02. In this case a large area of the stability on a plane (ϕc,Δ) is available. If the beam velocity βc > 0.03, the parameter α becomes less than 0.1. For small α, the area of stability tapers 160 abruptly and the phase advances per period, μz and μr, quickly decrease. In this case the working point is lo- cated near stability borders. The area of stability can be extended by adding a so- lenoid focusing which will also provide a separate con- trol of transverse and longitudinal beam dynamics. For accelerator with SC solenoids this method was devel- oped and studied both analytically [2] and with the help of the three-dimensional code TRACK [4]. It was shown that a combined focusing structure with solenoid and APF has obvious advantages compared to the refer- ence design and can significantly reduce the cost of the linac. In our case for a beam velocity range of 0.03 < βc < 0.04 when α = 0.1 it is sufficient to add one SC solenoid per accelerating period. If one solenoid with magnetic field B = 9 T is added, there is a large area of stability and a wide range of Δ and ϕc is possi- ble. The stability diagram for B = 9 T is shown in Fig.3,a by the hatching. 3. BEAM STABILITY ANALISYS BY SMOOTH APPROXIMATION In SC linac design, it is very important to know the bucket size since it relates to the longitudinal RF focus- ing. In this case the longitudinal acceptance cannot be obtained by matrix method because of the assumption that the particles have small longitudinal oscillation amplitude. In order to investigate the nonlinear ion beam dynamics in such accelerated structure and to cal- culate the longitudinal and transverse acceptances it can be used smooth approximation [5,6]. In periodical struc- ture, which was shown in Fig.1, RF field can be ex- panded into a Fourier series as ( ) ( ) ⎭ ⎬ ⎫ ⎩ ⎨ ⎧ ++= ⎭ ⎬ ⎫ ⎩ ⎨ ⎧ ++= ∑ ∑ ∞ ∞ 1 ,,0.01 1 ,,0.00 sincosI sincosI zkfzkffrk L UE zkfzkffrk L UE n s nrn c nrrr n s nzn c nzzz (7) Here )ψφcos(00, += cz Sf , )ψφsin(00, +−= cr Sf , ( ) ( )ψφcos1, +−= + cn nc nz Tf , ( ) ( )ψφsin1 1 , +−= −+ cn ns nz Tf ( ) ( )ψφsin1 1 , +−= ++ cn nc nr Tf , ( ) ( )ψφcos1, +−= − cn ns nr Tf −+± ±= nnn SST , Sn ± = sin(Yn ±)/Yn ±, Yn ± = (kc ± kn)Lr/2. In this expressions: E = 2U/Lr, U is the cavity vol- tage amplitude; kn = 2πn/L, n = 0, 1, 2, …; kc is slip- ping factor, kc = (2π/λ)(1/βc – 1/βG). In the coefficients fn c,s the phase relative to the reference particle ψ de- fined by ψ = ω(t – tc), tc is the flight time of the reference particle. In the simple case the vector-potential of the mag- netic field Aφ = Br/2 can be approximated by the step function at every solenoid. If Ls is effective solenoid length and L is a lattice period, the external solenoid magnetic field can be represented as an expansion into spatial harmonics too. 3.1. SOLENOID FOCUSING Let us consider particle acceleration in the polyhar- monic fields of the cavities and solenoids. In general, individual particle motion is complicated but can be represented as the sum of a slow smooth motion (ψ and ρ = h0r) and a fast oscillation ( ψ~ and ρ~ ). The force driv- ing the ion motion can be separated into two parts cor- responding to the fast and slow motion. Following Ref. [6] one can apply averaging over the fast oscilla- tions and obtain the phase and radial motion equations in smooth approximation. ( ) ( ) ρdξ dρβγln dξ d dξ ρd ψdξ dψβγln dξ d3 dξ ψd 2 2 2 2 ∂ ∂ −=⎥ ⎦ ⎤ ⎢ ⎣ ⎡ + ∂ ∂ −=⎥ ⎦ ⎤ ⎢ ⎣ ⎡ + eff eff U U , (8) where Ueff = U0 + U1 + U2 is effective potential function. We use the following designations: ( )[ ] 2 000 ρ 2 1φsinφcosψ)ψφsin(ρIα4 L LbSU c ccc +−−+= ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( )∑ ∞ ⎥ ⎦ ⎤ ⎢ ⎣ ⎡ +++= 1 2 , 2 ,2 2 12 , 2 ,2 2 02 1 π2 ρI π2 ρIα s nr c nr s nz c nz ff n ff n U , (9) ( ) ( ) ( )∑∑ ⎟⎟ ⎠ ⎞ ⎜⎜ ⎝ ⎛ +−= 2 2 2 2 2 , 12 ρ sin π2 1sin π2 ρρIα4 n n n n c nrs X X n b X X n f L L bU Here b = (qBL/2mcβcγc)2, Xn = πnLs/L. The effective potential Ueff provides the full descrip- tion of the ion dynamics in the smooth one-particle ap- proximation. In Ref. [7] the longitudinal smooth ap- proximation with acceleration in SC linac was investi- gated by the numerical simulation. In our case the anal- ysis of the effective potential (9) makes it possible to study the condition at which the radial and phase stabili- ty of the beam is achieved. We begin our analysis with expanding Ueff in the vicinity of its minimum (ψ = 0, ρ = 0): ( ) ...ρ 2 1ψ 2 10,0 2222 +Ω+Ω+= rzeffeff UU (10) The expansion coefficients here depend on the pa- rameter of interaction α, the values of Lr/L, Ls/L and the slipping factor kc. The radial and phase stability of the beam will be provided when Ωz 2 > 0, Ωr 2 > 0, where Ωz, Ωr are dimensionless frequencies of small longitudinal and transverse oscillations. In the simplest case when the phase velocity βG changes from cavity to cavity and kc = 0 ( ) ( ) ( ) ( )( ) L Lb s r z +++−−=Ω −−=Ω c 22 c c 2 c φcos1χαφαsin2 φ2cosχαφαsin2 (11) Here the value of χ depends on the ratio of Lr/L. For some of Lr/L the value of χ is listed in Table 1. Table 1 Lr/L 0 1/4 1/2 1 χ 1/3 3/16 1/12 0 In single wave approximation when Lr/L = 1 and fast oscillation terms are absent, the value of χ = 0. In this case, the dimensionless frequencies Ωz, Ωr are close to the longitudinal and transverse phase advances per a cavity μz and μr which were founded by transfer matrix calculation. But the conditions of focusing are changed if the parameter α is large and the fast oscillations are 161 considered. The functions Ωz(α) and Ωr(α) for different values of φc are shown in Fig.4. The phase advances should be less than about π/2 for stable beam mo- tion [8]. In this case, the smooth approximation is ex- pected to be almost accurate and dimensionless fre- quencies Ωz, Ωr are close to the phase advances per a period μz and μr. Fig.4. The frequencies of longitudinal (solid lines) and transverse (dot lines) oscillations for B = 12 T (1 – φc = –10°, 2 – φc = –20° and 3 – φc = –30°) As it can see from Fig.4, the longitudinal oscillation will be stability for –π/4 < φc < 0 if the interaction pa- rameter α is limited, α < αmax = sin(–φc)/χcos(2φc). In this case the frequency of longitudinal oscillation has maximum value in α = αmax/2. If the magnetic field is absent the radial stability of the beam is achieved, if the interaction parameter α > αmin = 2sin(–φc)/χ(1+ cos2φc) The borders of stability area between Ωz = 0 and Ωr = 0 are shown in Fig.5 for deferent values of magnet- ic field, B, when Lr/L = 1/4. The value α on stability diagram moves down quick- ly on the α = 0 axis when the beam velocity increases. For B = 0, the area of stability exists but it tapers abrupt- ly and the radial stability is absent when the beam ve- locity increases. The common area of stability can be extended by a solenoid focusing which will also provide a separate control of transverse and longitudinal beam dynamics. For beam velocity β ≥ 0.1, α ≈ 2 it is suffi- cient to increase the solenoid field B = 12T if the refer- ence particle phase φc > −20°. Fig.5. Stability area for different values of the magnetic field B 3.2. APF AND SOLENOID FOCUSING The smooth approximation has been applied to the study of APF in RIB linac. New effective potential Ueff must be find for this accelerating structure. The analysis of the effective potential makes it possible to study the condition at which the radial and phase stability of the beam is achieved. In the simplest case when a slipping factor kc = 0 it can find the dimensionless frequencies of the small oscillations: { ( )} 2 2 2 1 2 8α cos sinφ α χ cos -χ sin cos 2φ , z c c Ω = − Δ + ⎡ ⎤+ Δ Δ⎣ ⎦ (12) ( ) ( )[ ] .φsin1sinχφcos1cosχ 2 α sinφcosα4 22 2 22 1 2 ρ ⎭ ⎬ ⎫+Δ++Δ+ ⎩ ⎨ ⎧ +Δ=Ω cc c (13) In this expressions ϕ1,2 = ϕc ± Δ are reference par- ticle phases in the neighbour cavities, the values of χ1,2 depend on the ratio of Lr/L (see Table 2). The common area of the beam stability is shown in Fig.3 by the fill- ing. This area is located between the borders where Ωz = 0 and Ωr = 0. Table 2 Lres 0 L/4 L/2 L χ1 1/6 1/24 0 0 χ2 1/2 1/3 1/6 0 The analysis of APF for the charge-to-mass ratio Z/A = 1/66 shows that the effective focusing and accele- ration are realized, when the beam velocity 0.01< βc < 0.02 and the cavity length is small (Lr/L < 1/4). The longitudinal and transverse stabilities are realized simultaneously only for a small asymmetry at the choice of the reference particle phases (φc = −5°) and for large value Δ . If the value of Δ increases the rate of energy gain reduces. The working point is lo- cated near right side of beam stability border where Ωz = 0 for symmetric choice of the reference particle phases (φc = 0). In this case the longitudinal acceptance is very small. Fig.6. Separatrixes for φc = –5°, Δ = 45° and ρ = 0 for different parameter α: 1 – α = 2, 2 – α = 1 and 3 – α = 0.1 It is interesting to investigate the nonlinear ion beam dynamics in such accelerated structure. Using of the 162 effective potential Ueff we can calculate the longitudinal acceptance. In Fig.6 it is shown the separatrixes for φc = −5°, Δ = 45° and ρ = 0 when the beam velocity increases and the parameter α decreases from 2 to 0.1. The energy spread of the separatrix, Δγ = (LV/L)(dψ/dξ), decreases in 10 times and the phase length Ψ of separa- trix decreases in 3 times. In this case longitudinal accep- tance decreases in 15 times. If the value of the cavity voltage amplitude U is preset the separatrix area de- pends on the value of Lr/L ratio. The smooth approxima- tion gives a weaker effective RF bucket, i.e. smaller phase acceptance and potential well depth, compared with the single wave approximation when the fast oscil- lations are not considered. For small α the value of longitudinal acceptance quickly decreases and size of beam envelope Xm in- creases. These disadvantages of APF can be removed by adding a focusing solenoid into focusing period which will also allow separate control of the transverse and longitudinal beam dynamics. The combination of low- field SC solenoids and APF is very effectively at all range of beam velocity 0.02 ≤ β ≤ 0.06. The combined focusing structure includes both SC solenoid and APF in every focusing period. The transverse focusing can be realized in the magnetic field B ≤ 6 Т for maximum value of beam envelop Xm=4 mm and B ≤ 9 Т for beam envelop Xm=3 mm. But in this case the longitudinal fo- cusing will become worse because the longitudinal os- cillation frequency Ωz will be small. CONCLUSION Two methods of the focusing analysis are compared for low ion velocities. The low charge state beams re- quire stronger transverse focusing in RIB linac. In order to reduce the cost of the SC solenoids it can be used APF or the combination of low-field SC solenoids and ARF. By the smooth approximation it is studied more detailed nonlinear ion beam dynamics and found the borders of the beam stability area. It is done the recom- mendation for choice of the reference particle phases and the value of solenoid magnetic field B. REFERENCES 1. P.N. Ostroumov, et al. // Proc. of PAC2001. Chicago, IL, June 18-21, 2001, p.4080. 2. E.S. Masunov, P.N. Ostroumov, et al. // Proc. of PAC2003. Portland, June 2001, p.2963. 3. Y.B. Faynberg // Zh. Tekn. Fiz. 1959, v.29, p.568. 4. P.N. Ostroumov, E.S. Masunov, et al. // Proc. of the LINAC’2004. Lubeck, Germany, p.348. 5. P.L. Kapitsa, Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz. 1951, v.21, p.588. 6. E.S. Masunov, N.E. Vinogradov // Phys. Rev. ST- AB. 2001, v.4, 070101. 7. Ji Qiang, R.W. Garnett // Nucl. Instr. and Meth. 2003, v.A496, p.33. 8. L.J. Hofmann. Laslett, et al. // Part. Acc. 1983, v.13, p.145. УСКОРЕНИЕ ИОННОГО ПУЧКА В СИСТЕМЕ ИЗ ПЕРИОДИЧЕСКОЙ ПОСЛЕДОВАТЕЛЬНОСТИ НЕЗАВИСИМО ФАЗИРУЕМЫХ РЕЗОНАТОРОВ Э.С. Масунов, А.В. Самошин Сверхпроводящий линейный ускоритель ионов основан на использовании периодической системы, со- стоящей из идентичных ниобиевых резонаторов. Посредством специального фазирования ВЧ-резонаторов можно обеспечить устойчивое движение частиц во всем ускорителе. В этой статье найдены условия устой- чивости движения пучка ионов. Матричный метод расчета и уравнение движения в гладком приближении используются для анализа фазопеременной фокусировки пучка в сверхпроводящем ускорителе. ПРИСКОРЕННЯ ІОННОГО ПУЧКУ У СИСТЕМІ З ПЕРІОДИЧНОЮ ПОСЛІДОВНІСТЮ НЕЗАЛЕЖНО ФАЗУЄМИХ РЕЗОНАТОРІВ Е.С. Масунов, А.В. Самошин Надпровідний лінійний прискорювач іонів заснований на використанні періодичної системи, що склада- ється з ідентичних ніобієвих резонаторів. За допомогою спеціального фазування ВЧ-резонаторів можна за- безпечити стійкий рух часток у всьому прискорювачі. У статті знайдено умови стійкості руху пучка іонів. Для аналізу фазозмінного фокусування пучка у надпровідному прискорювачі використано матричний метод розрахунку і рівняння руху у гладкому наближенні.
id nasplib_isofts_kiev_ua-123456789-111403
institution Digital Library of Periodicals of National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine
issn 1562-6016
language English
last_indexed 2025-12-07T16:33:15Z
publishDate 2008
publisher Національний науковий центр «Харківський фізико-технічний інститут» НАН України
record_format dspace
spelling Masunov, E.S.
Samoshin, A.V.
2017-01-09T18:56:57Z
2017-01-09T18:56:57Z
2008
Ion beam acceleration in system from periodic sequence of independetly phased cavities / E.S. Masunov, A.V. Samoshin // Вопросы атомной науки и техники. — 2008. — № 3. — С. 158-162. — Бібліогр.: 8 назв. — англ.
1562-6016
PACS: 29.27.-A, 29.27.Bd
https://nasplib.isofts.kiev.ua/handle/123456789/111403
Ion superconducting linac is based on periodic system consisting of the identical niobium cavities. By specific&#xd; phasing of the RF cavities one can provide a stable particle motion in the whole accelerator. In this paper the beam&#xd; stability conditions are founded. The matrix calculation and motion equation in the smooth approximation are used&#xd; for alternating phase focusing analysis in superconducting linac.
Надпровідний лінійний прискорювач іонів заснований на використанні періодичної системи, що складається з ідентичних ніобієвих резонаторів. За допомогою спеціального фазування ВЧ-резонаторів можна забезпечити стійкий рух часток у всьому прискорювачі. У статті знайдено умови стійкості руху пучка іонів. Для аналізу фазозмінного фокусування пучка у надпровідному прискорювачі використано матричний метод розрахунку і рівняння руху у гладкому наближенні.
Сверхпроводящий линейный ускоритель ионов основан на использовании периодической системы, состоящей из идентичных ниобиевых резонаторов. Посредством специального фазирования ВЧ-резонаторов можно обеспечить устойчивое движение частиц во всем ускорителе. В этой статье найдены условия устойчивости движения пучка ионов. Матричный метод расчета и уравнение движения в гладком приближении используются для анализа фазопеременной фокусировки пучка в сверхпроводящем ускорителе.
en
Національний науковий центр «Харківський фізико-технічний інститут» НАН України
Вопросы атомной науки и техники
Новые методы ускорения, сильноточные пучки
Ion beam acceleration in system from periodic sequence of independetly phased cavities
Прискорення іонного пучку у системі з періодичною послідовністю незалежно фазуємих резонаторів
Ускорение ионного пучка в системе из периодической последовательности независимо фазируемых резонаторов
Article
published earlier
spellingShingle Ion beam acceleration in system from periodic sequence of independetly phased cavities
Masunov, E.S.
Samoshin, A.V.
Новые методы ускорения, сильноточные пучки
title Ion beam acceleration in system from periodic sequence of independetly phased cavities
title_alt Прискорення іонного пучку у системі з періодичною послідовністю незалежно фазуємих резонаторів
Ускорение ионного пучка в системе из периодической последовательности независимо фазируемых резонаторов
title_full Ion beam acceleration in system from periodic sequence of independetly phased cavities
title_fullStr Ion beam acceleration in system from periodic sequence of independetly phased cavities
title_full_unstemmed Ion beam acceleration in system from periodic sequence of independetly phased cavities
title_short Ion beam acceleration in system from periodic sequence of independetly phased cavities
title_sort ion beam acceleration in system from periodic sequence of independetly phased cavities
topic Новые методы ускорения, сильноточные пучки
topic_facet Новые методы ускорения, сильноточные пучки
url https://nasplib.isofts.kiev.ua/handle/123456789/111403
work_keys_str_mv AT masunoves ionbeamaccelerationinsystemfromperiodicsequenceofindependetlyphasedcavities
AT samoshinav ionbeamaccelerationinsystemfromperiodicsequenceofindependetlyphasedcavities
AT masunoves priskorennâíonnogopučkuusistemízperíodičnoûposlídovnístûnezaležnofazuêmihrezonatorív
AT samoshinav priskorennâíonnogopučkuusistemízperíodičnoûposlídovnístûnezaležnofazuêmihrezonatorív
AT masunoves uskorenieionnogopučkavsistemeizperiodičeskoiposledovatelʹnostinezavisimofaziruemyhrezonatorov
AT samoshinav uskorenieionnogopučkavsistemeizperiodičeskoiposledovatelʹnostinezavisimofaziruemyhrezonatorov