Graphene and quantum electrodynamics

A single atomic layer of carbon, graphene, has the low-energy "relativistic- like" gapless quasiparticle excitations which in the continuum approximation are described by quantum electrodynamics in 2+1 dimensions. The Dirac- like character of charge carriers in graphene leads to several un...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Datum:2013
1. Verfasser: Gusynin, V.P.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:English
Veröffentlicht: Національний науковий центр «Харківський фізико-технічний інститут» НАН України 2013
Schriftenreihe:Вопросы атомной науки и техники
Schlagworte:
Online Zugang:https://nasplib.isofts.kiev.ua/handle/123456789/111869
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Назва журналу:Digital Library of Periodicals of National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine
Zitieren:Graphene and quantum electrodynamics / V.P. Gusynin // Вопросы атомной науки и техники. — 2013. — № 3. — С. 29-34. — Бібліогр.: 27 назв. — англ.

Institution

Digital Library of Periodicals of National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine
id nasplib_isofts_kiev_ua-123456789-111869
record_format dspace
spelling nasplib_isofts_kiev_ua-123456789-1118692025-02-09T13:42:15Z Graphene and quantum electrodynamics Графен i квантова електродинамiка Графен и квантовая электродинамика Gusynin, V.P. Квантово-полевые и групповые подходы теоретической физики. Семинар памяти Петра Ивановича Фомина A single atomic layer of carbon, graphene, has the low-energy "relativistic- like" gapless quasiparticle excitations which in the continuum approximation are described by quantum electrodynamics in 2+1 dimensions. The Dirac- like character of charge carriers in graphene leads to several unique electronic properties which are important for applications in electronic devices. We study the gap opening in graphene following the ideas put forward by P. I. Fomin for investigation of chiral symmetry breaking and particle mass generation in quantum field theory. Одноатомний шар в углецю, графен, має низькоенергетичнi безщiлиннi квазiчастинковi збудження, якi в континуальному наближеннi описуються квантовою електродинамiкою в розмiрностi 2+1. Дiракiвський характер заряджених носiї в у графенi призводить до багатьох унiкальних електронних властивостей, що мають важливе значення для застосувань в електронних пристроях. Ми дослiджуємо вiдкриття щiлини в графенi, слiдуючи iдеям, запропонованим П.I.Фомiним для дослiдження порушення киральної симетрiїi генерацiї мас частинок у квантовiй теорiї поля. Одноатомный слой углерода, графен, обладает низкоэнергетическими безщелевыми квазичастичными возбуждениями, которые в континуальном приближении описываются квантовой электродинамикой в размерности 2+1. Дираковский характер заряженных носителей в графене приводит ко многим уникальным электронным свойствам, имеющим важное значение для применений в электронных устройствах. Мы исследуем открытие щели в графене, следуя идеям, предложенным П.И.Фоминым для исследования нарушения киральной симметриии генерации масс частиц в квантовой теории поля. I have benefited a lot from inspiring common work with my teacher Petr Ivanovich Fomin, the pioneer of the theory of the dynamical origin of masses of elementary particles. This work was supported in part by the European FP7 program Grant No. SIMTECH 246937, the joint Ukrainian-Russian SFFR-RFBR Grant F53.2/028, and the Grant STCU #5716-T ”Development of Graphene Technologies and Investigation of Graphene-based Nanostructures for Nanoelectronics and Optoelectronics”. The author acknowledges also a collaborative grant from the Swedish Institute. 2013 Article Graphene and quantum electrodynamics / V.P. Gusynin // Вопросы атомной науки и техники. — 2013. — № 3. — С. 29-34. — Бібліогр.: 27 назв. — англ. 1562-6016 PACS: 81.05.uW, 03.65.Pm https://nasplib.isofts.kiev.ua/handle/123456789/111869 en Вопросы атомной науки и техники application/pdf Національний науковий центр «Харківський фізико-технічний інститут» НАН України
institution Digital Library of Periodicals of National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine
collection DSpace DC
language English
topic Квантово-полевые и групповые подходы теоретической физики. Семинар памяти Петра Ивановича Фомина
Квантово-полевые и групповые подходы теоретической физики. Семинар памяти Петра Ивановича Фомина
spellingShingle Квантово-полевые и групповые подходы теоретической физики. Семинар памяти Петра Ивановича Фомина
Квантово-полевые и групповые подходы теоретической физики. Семинар памяти Петра Ивановича Фомина
Gusynin, V.P.
Graphene and quantum electrodynamics
Вопросы атомной науки и техники
description A single atomic layer of carbon, graphene, has the low-energy "relativistic- like" gapless quasiparticle excitations which in the continuum approximation are described by quantum electrodynamics in 2+1 dimensions. The Dirac- like character of charge carriers in graphene leads to several unique electronic properties which are important for applications in electronic devices. We study the gap opening in graphene following the ideas put forward by P. I. Fomin for investigation of chiral symmetry breaking and particle mass generation in quantum field theory.
format Article
author Gusynin, V.P.
author_facet Gusynin, V.P.
author_sort Gusynin, V.P.
title Graphene and quantum electrodynamics
title_short Graphene and quantum electrodynamics
title_full Graphene and quantum electrodynamics
title_fullStr Graphene and quantum electrodynamics
title_full_unstemmed Graphene and quantum electrodynamics
title_sort graphene and quantum electrodynamics
publisher Національний науковий центр «Харківський фізико-технічний інститут» НАН України
publishDate 2013
topic_facet Квантово-полевые и групповые подходы теоретической физики. Семинар памяти Петра Ивановича Фомина
url https://nasplib.isofts.kiev.ua/handle/123456789/111869
citation_txt Graphene and quantum electrodynamics / V.P. Gusynin // Вопросы атомной науки и техники. — 2013. — № 3. — С. 29-34. — Бібліогр.: 27 назв. — англ.
series Вопросы атомной науки и техники
work_keys_str_mv AT gusyninvp grapheneandquantumelectrodynamics
AT gusyninvp grafenikvantovaelektrodinamika
AT gusyninvp grafenikvantovaâélektrodinamika
first_indexed 2025-11-26T08:10:09Z
last_indexed 2025-11-26T08:10:09Z
_version_ 1849839706283442176
fulltext GRAPHENE AND QUANTUM ELECTRODYNAMICS V.P.Gusynin∗ Bogolyubov Institute for Theoretical Physics NAS of Ukraine, 03680, Kiev, Ukraine (Received January 1, 2013) A single atomic layer of carbon, graphene, has the low-energy “relativistic- like” gapless quasiparticle excitations which in the continuum approximation are described by quantum electrodynamics in 2+1 dimensions. The Dirac- like character of charge carriers in graphene leads to several unique electronic properties which are important for applications in electronic devices. We study the gap opening in graphene following the ideas put forward by P. I. Fomin for investigation of chiral symmetry breaking and particle mass generation in quantum field theory. PACS: 81.05.uW, 03.65.Pm 1. INTRODUCTION Graphene, a one-atom-thick sheet of crystalline car- bon with atoms packed in the honeycomb lattice, is a remarkable system with many unusual properties that was fabricated for the first time 8 years ago [1]. Graphene is the building block for many forms of car- bon allotropes, for example, graphite is obtained by the stacking of graphene layers that is stabilized by weak van der Waals forces, carbon nanotubes are formed by graphene wrapping, and fullerenes can also be obtained from graphene by replacing several hexagons into pentagonsand heptagons. The ability to sustain huge (> 108A/cm2) elec- tric currents and a very high electron mobility, µ ∼ 2·105cm2/Vs for suspended graphene, make graphene a promising candidate for applications in electronic devices such as nanoscale field effect transistors. Its thermal conductivity ∼ 5 · 103W/mK is larger than for carbon nanotubes or diamond. Graphene is op- tically transparent: it absorbs πα ≈ 2.3% of white light (α = 1/137 – fine structure constant) that can be important for making liquid crystal displays. It is the strongest material ever tested with stiffness 340 N/m. Because of this graphene remains stable and conductive at extremely small scales of order sev- eral nanometers. Theoretically, it was shown long time ago [2] that quasiparticle excitations in graphene have a linear dispersion at low energies and are described by the massless Dirac equation in 2+1 dimensions. The ob- servation of anomalous integer quantum Hall effect in graphene [3, 4] is in perfect agreement with the theoretical predictions [5]–[7] and became a direct experimental proof of the existence of gapless Dirac quasiparticles in graphene. In the continuum limit, graphene model on a honeycomb lattice, with both on-site and nearest-neighbor repulsions,maps onto a 2+1-dimensional field theory of Dirac fermions in- teracting through the Coulomb potential plus, in general, some residual short-range interactions rep- resented by local four-fermion terms. The vanishing density of states at the Dirac points ensures that the Coulomb interaction between the electrons in graphene retains its long-range character due to vanishing of the static polarization function when the wave vector ~q → 0. The large value of the “fine-structure” coupling constant αg = e2/~vF ∼ 1 (vF ≈ 106 m/s is the Fermi velocity) means that a strong attraction takes place between electrons and holes in graphene at the Dirac points. For graphene on a substrate with the effective coupling αg/κ ¿ 1, κ being a dielectric constant, the system is in a weak- coupling regime and exhibits semimetallic properties due to the absence of a gap in the electronic spec- trum. All the currently proposed applications of graphene are based on that fact. Much less is known about suspended graphene where the coupling con- stant is large.In fact, suspended graphene provides a condensed-matter analog of strongly coupled quan- tum electrodynamics (QED) intensively studied by P.I. Fomin and collaborators in the 1970s and 1980s. [8, 9]. The dynamics of the vacuum in QED leads to many peculiar effects not yet observed in nature. Some QED-like effects such as zitterbewegung (trem- bling motion), Klein tunneling, Schwinger pair pro- duction, supercritical atomic collapse and symmetry broken phase with a gap at strong coupling have a chance to be tested in graphene. In fact, graphene could be used as a bench-top particle-physics labora- tory,allowing us to investigate the fundamental inter- actions of matter(recently, the Klein tunneling and supercritical atomic collapse in graphene were ob- served experimentally, see papers [10] and [11], re- spectively). ∗Corresponding author E-mail address: vgusynin@bitp.kiev.ua ISSN 1562-6016. PROBLEMS OF ATOMIC SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2013, N3(85). Series: Nuclear Physics Investigations (60), p.29-34. 29 2. DYNAMICAL MASS GENERATION IN QUANTUM FIELD THEORY Proposals that electron-electron interactions in graphene could generate an electronic gap were in- vestigated and actually preceded the discovery of graphene [12, 13]. The gap opening in graphene is an analogue of the phenomenon of dynamical mass generation which is studied in quantum field theory since the Nambu-Jona-Lasinio (NJL) paper in 1961 [14] The Lagrangian of the NJL model// L = Ψ̄iγµ∂µΨ + G 2 [ (Ψ̄Ψ)2 + (Ψ̄iγ5Ψ)2 ] (1) is invariant under ordinary phase and chiral transfor- mations, Ψ → eiαΨ, Ψ̄ → Ψ̄e−iα, Ψ → eiαγ5Ψ, Ψ̄ → Ψ̄e−iαγ5 , (2) and the chiral invariance forbids the mass generation in perturbation theory. The self-consistent Hartree- Fock equation for a mass (Λ is a cutoff), 4π2m GΛ2 = m− m3 Λ ln ( 1 + m2 Λ2 ) (3) has a nontrivial solution m 6= 0 if the coupling con- stant exceeds some critical value, G > Gc = 4π2 Λ2 , leading to a nontrivial chiral condensate < Ψ̄Ψ > 6= 0. In QED the problem of a mass generation starts since the work by V. Weisskopf [15] who calculated for the first time the one-loop correction to the bare electron mass m0, m = m0 + 3α 2π m0 ln ( Λ m ) (4) The total electron mass m vanishes for m0 = 0. On the other hand, solving the self-consistent equation for the mass, m = m0 + 3α 2π m ln ( Λ m ) (5) one gets a nontrivial solution, m = Λ exp ( −3π 2α ) , (6) even for zero bare electron mass m = 0. This so- lution, called the superconducting-type solution be- cause of its nonanalytical dependence on the coupling α, was thoroughly studied in the works by P. I. Fomin (see review [16] and the references therein) using the Schwinger-Dyson equations for the electron and pho- ton propagators and for the vertex function. The solution (6) should be compared to the solution for a quasiparticle gap in the Bardeen-Cooper-Schrieffer (BCS) theory of superconductivity, ∆ = ωD exp(− 2 gνF ), (7) where ωD is the Debye frequency, g the electron- phonon coupling constant, and νF is the density of states on the Fermi surface. In the BCS theory the gap in the quasiparticle spectrum is generated for any value of the coupling constant. The physical reason for zero value of the critical coupling constant in the BCS theory is connected with the presence of the Fermi surface. More refined study of the Schwinger-Dyson equa- tion for the fermion propagator in QED (Fig. 1), leads in the ladder approximation to the solution [17], m ' Λ exp ( − const√ α− αc ) , (8) where the critical coupling constant is of order one, αc ∼ 1 Note the essentially nonanalytical dependence of the mass on the coupling constant α. Such a behav- ior of a mass remains valid in more refined approx- imation when fermions loops are neglected but all diagrams with crossed photon lines are taken into ac- count (the so-called quenched approximation). Tak- ing into account the vacuum polarization [18] changes the result to m ' Λ(α− αc)β , α & αc, β . 1 2 . (9) Fig.1.The Schwinger-Dyson equation for the fermion propagator The solution (8) for the dynamical electron mass combines features of a superconducting gap(non- analytical dependence on the coupling constant) and of the NJL gap (the presence of a critical coupling). The presence of a magnetic field makes the situa- tion even more interesting. It was shown in Ref. [19] that a magnetic field catalyzes the gap generation for gapless fermions in relativistic-like systems, and even the weakest attraction leads to the formation of a symmetry-breaking condensate and a gap gen- eration. For example, in the four-dimensional NJL model in an external magnetic field the gap (mass) is generated at any coupling constant [20]: ∆ ' √ |eB| exp(− 1 2ν0G ) , (10) where B is the strength of a magnetic field and ν0 = |eB|/4π2 is the density of states at the low- est Landau level (compare with a superconducting gap).This phenomenon is called magnetic catalysis and its main features are model independent. The essence of the magnetic catalysis is that the dynam- ics of the electrons in a magnetic field, B,corresponds effectively to a theory with spatial dimension reduced by two units (note a close similarity with the role of 30 the Fermi surface in the BCS theory) if their energy is much less than the Landau gap √ |eB|. The zero- energy Landau level, which plays, in fact, the role of the Fermi surface, has a finite density of states and this is the key ingredient of magnetic catalysis. The magnetic catalysis plays an important role in quantum Hall effect studies in graphene where it is responsible for lifting the degeneracy of the Landau levels. 3. LOW-ENERGY EFFECTIVE THEORY OF GRAPHENE The electronic band structure of graphene close to the Fermi level forms the basis of the low-energy ef- fective theory of graphene. This band structure is a reflection of the hexagonal arrangement of the car- bon atoms. As was shown by P. Wallace [2], the two-dimensional graphene honeycomb lattice has two atoms per unit cell and its tight-binding band struc- ture consists of conduction and valence bands. The energy spectrum of electrons as a function of a wave vector has the form E(~k) = ±t √ 1 + 4 cos √ 3kxa 2 cos kya 2 + 4 cos2 kya 2 , (11) where t ≈ 2.8 eV is nearest-neighbor hopping energy (hopping between different sublattices), in the tight- binding lattice Hamiltonian, a = 2.46 Å is the lattice constant. The two bands touch each other and cross the Fermi level, corresponding to zero chemical po- tential µ = 0, in six K points located at the corners of the hexagonal 2D Brillouin zone, but only two of them, say K, K ′ = (± 4π 3α , 0), are nonequivalent. Low- energy excitations near two nonequivalent K-points have a linear dispersion, E(~k) = ±~vF |~k| where ~ = h/2π is the Planck constant, vF = √ 3ta/2~ ≈ 106 m/s is the Fermi velocity which is only 300 times less the velocity of light. Electron states at each K- point are described by the spinor, ΨKσ = ( ΨKAσ ΨKBσ ) , which consists of electron wave functions on atoms A, B of two sublattices, σ = ± describes the real spin, and satisfies the massless Dirac equation, ( ~γ0i∂t + ~vF (iγ1∂x + iγ2∂y) ) ΨKσ(x, y) = 0. (12) Two-dimensional Dirac gamma matrices are given in terms of the Pauli matrices γµ = (τ3, iτ2,−iτ3), µ = 0, 1, 2. Spinors at two K-points can be combined into one four-dimensional Dirac spinor Ψσ = (ΨKAσ,ΨKBσ, ΨK′Aσ, ΨK′Bσ)T , which satisfies the Dirac equation (12) but with 4x4 gamma matrices γµ = τ̃3 ⊗ (τ3, iτ2,−iτ3) (the Pauli matrix τ̃3 acts in the space of two K-points). The four-component spinor structure accounts for quasi- particle excitations of sublattices A and B around the two Dirac points (valleys) in the band structure. Taking into account the Coulomb interaction be- tween quasiparticles we come at the effective low- energy theory described by the QED-like action (the spin index is omitted) S = ∫ dtd3r { 1 2 (∂iA0)2 −A0j0+ [ Ψ̄(t, r)(~γ0i∂t + ~vF iγi∂i −∆0)Ψ(t, r) ] δ(z) } , (13) where j0 = eΨ̄(t, r)γ0Ψ(t, r)δ(z) is the charge den- sity. Note that the electric field, described by the scalar potential A0 and responsible for interparticle interaction, propagates in a three-dimensional space, while fermion fields, describing electron- and hole- type quasiparticles, are localized on two-dimensional planes. This is a typical example of the so-called brane world models studied last years in high en- ergy physics.Integration over z-coordinate leads to the standard nonlocal Coulomb interaction for qua- siparticles in a plane. In Eq. (13) we included also a bare gap ∆0 which can be generated due to the interaction with a substrate [21]. In the presence of this term the dispersion law for quasiparticles takes the form E(~k) = ± √ (~vF ~k)2 + ∆2 0 and two zones are separated by 2∆0. For ∆0 = 0 the continuum effec- tive theory described by the action (13) possesses the large “flavor” U(4) symmetry in the spin-valley space. In the next section we will study the dynamical sym- metry breaking of this symmetry and generation of a quasiparticle gap due to the Coulomb interaction when the bare gap is zero. 4. GAP GENERATION AND SEMIMETAL-INSULATOR PHASE TRANSITION IN GRAPHENE In pristinegraphenean analog of the fine-structure constant αg & 1. Given the strong attraction, one may expect an instability in the excitonic chan- nel (electron-hole pairing) with subsequent quantum phase transition to a phase with gapped quasipar- ticles that may turn graphene into an insulator. In graphene sheets deposited on a substrate,such a transition is effectively inhibited due to the screen- ing of the Coulomb interaction by the dielectric (αg → αg/κ). This semimetal-insulator transition in graphene is widely discussed now in the literature since the first study of the problem in Refs. [12, 13]. As is well known, in the BCS theory the Bethe- Salpeter (BS) equation for an electron-electron bound state in the normal state of metal has a solution with imaginary energy, i.e., a tachyon. This means that normal state is unstable and a phase transition to the superconducting state takes place. In order to analyze excitonic instability in graphene, we consider the BS equation for an electron-hole bound state. In the random phase ap- proximation, the BS equation for an amputed bound- 31 state wave function reads χαβ(q, P ) = iαg (2π)2 ∫ d3kD(k0, |~q − ~k|)× × [ γ0S(q + P 2 χ(k, P )S(k − P 2 )γ0 ] αβ , (14) where q = (q0, ~q), P = (P0, ~P ) are relative and total energies-momenta of bound electron and hole. The Coulomb propagator has the form D(ω, ~q) = 1 |~q|+ Π(ω, ~q) , (15) and the one-loop polarization function is Π(ω, ~q) = πe2 2κ ~q2 √ (~vF ~q)2 − ω2 , (16) which in the instantaneous approximation reduces to Π(ω, ~q) = παg|~q|/2κ. We consider the following ansatz for the matrix structure of the wave function of an excitonic bound state, χ(q, P ) = χ5(q, P )γ5 + χ05(q, P )~q~γγ0γ5 . (17) In the random phase approximation with static polar- ization function, i.e., Π(ω = 0, ~q), we find an analyti- cal solution with pure imaginary energy (tachyon) if the coupling constant αg exceeds some critical value αgc (for details, see Ref. [22]): P 2 0 = −4Λ2 exp ( − 4πn√ 4λ− 1 + δ ) , δ ≈ 7.3, (18) λ > λc = 1 4 , λ = αg 2 + παg , n = 1, 2, ... In the instantaneous approximation αgc = 2.33, while more accurate numerical treatment gives αgc = 1.62. In the supercritical regime the wave function χ5(~q) as a function of a relative momentum behaves asymp- totically as χ5(|~q|) ∼ |~q|−1/2 cos (√ λ− 1 4 ln ( |~q| |P0| ) + const ) . Such oscillatory behavior is typical for the phenom- enon known in quantum mechanics as the “fall into the center” (collapse): in this case the energy of a sys- tem is unbounded from below and there is no ground state. Nodes of the wave function of the bound state signify the existence of the tachyon states with imag- inary energy P0. To find a stable ground state we solved a gap equation which in the random phase approximation with static polarization has the form [23], ∆(P ) = λ ∫ Λ 0 q∆(q)K(p, q)√ q2 + (∆(q)/vF )2 .dq (19) Here the symmetric kernel of the equation is K = 2 π 1 p + q K ( 2 √ pq p + q ) , and K(x) is the complete elliptic integral of the first kind. The nontrivial solution for the momentum dependent gap function ∆(p) exists if the coupling λ > 1/4 (αgc > 1.62 and its value at p = 0 (gap itself) is given by ∆(p = 0) = ΛvF exp ( − π√ λ− 1/4 ) . (20) The essentially nonanalytical dependence of the gap (20) on the coupling constant corresponds to a contin- uous phase transition of infinite order. Such a behav- ior is inherent for the Berezinskii-Kosterlitz-Thouless phase transition, or the conformal phase transition, and is related to the scale invariance of the problem under consideration. Note, however, that taking into account the finite size of graphene samples should turn this phase transition into a second-order one. In the case of frequency dependent polarization function (dynamical screening) the critical constant is lower, αgc = 0.92. A dynamical gap is generated only if αg > αgc. Since for suspended clean graphene the fine-structure constant αg = 2.19 is supercritical, the dynamical gap will be generated making graphene an insulator. Note that for graphene on SiO2 substrate, the dielectric constant κ=2.8 and αg = 0.78, i.e., the system is in the subcritical regime. The value of αgc is rather large that implies that a weak-coupling ap- proach might be quantitatively inadequate for the problem of the gap generation in suspended clean graphene. Therefore, it is instructive to compare our analytical results to lattice MonteCarlo studies, [24] where αgc = 1.08 ± 0.05 that is rather close to our analytical findings. Additional short-range four-fermion interactions were also included in the continuum model to account for the lattice simulation results [23]. In spite of being small, the induced local interactions can play a signif- icant role in the critical behavior observed in lattice simulations.Instead of a critical point, we obtained the critical line in the plane of electromagnetic, α, and four-fermion, g̃, coupling constants (Fig. 2), and found a second-order phase transition separating zero gap and gapped phases with critical exponents close to those found in lattice calculations. We expect that the form of the critical curve in graphene can be checked in further lattice simula- tions. Fig.2. Phase diagram 32 5. CONCLUSIONS We studied in this paper an intriguing possibility that spontaneous formation of excitons, electron-hole bound states, and the concomitant formation of exci- tonic condensate which breaks chiral symmetry, may turn graphene into a Mott insulator. The insulator phase of graphene with gapped quasiparticles is in line with the strong coupling phase of QED stud- ied by P.I. Fomin and his collaborators in the 70s and 80s. The strong coupling phase of QED was searched in heavy ion collisions in GSI-Darmstadt in the 80s. Various sharp lines were observed in energy spectra of electron-positron and photon-photon emit- ted back-to-back with kinetic energies near 350 keV. Suggested explanation was that the correlated sig- nals corresponded to the decay of a neutral particle produced in the collision, and that particle is natu- rally present in strong coupling phase of QED (tightly bound electron-positron pairs). [25] However, later on the Darmstadt experiments have faded. The spontaneous gap generation and insulator phase in graphene(strong coupling phase of graphene) have been predicted [12, 13] before graphene was fab- ricated in the laboratory. So far, however experi- mentally there has been no conclusive evidence that semimetal-insulator transition of suspended mono- layer graphene occurs at low temperature. [26] In this respect, it has been already suggested that the growth of the Fermi velocity,when approaching the charge neutrality point [23, 27], makes the effective interaction strength smaller than a critical value, thus preventing a gap generation.Certainly, this problem worth of further studying, both theoretically and ex- perimentally. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I have benefited a lot from inspiring common work with my teacher Petr Ivanovich Fomin, the pioneer of the theory of the dynamical origin of masses of elementary particles. This work was supported in part by the Euro- pean FP7 program Grant No. SIMTECH 246937, the joint Ukrainian-Russian SFFR-RFBR Grant F53.2/028, and the Grant STCU #5716-T ”Devel- opment of Graphene Technologies and Investigation of Graphene-based Nanostructures for Nanoelectron- ics and Optoelectronics”. The author acknowledges also a collaborative grant from the Swedish Institute. References 1. K.S. Novoselov, A.K. Geim, S.V. Morozov, D. Jiang, Y. Zhang, S. V. Dubonos, I. V. Grig- orieva, and A. A. Firsov. Electric field effect in atomically thin carbon films. // Science. 2004, v.306, N5696, p. 666–669. 2. G.W. Semenoff. Condensed-matter simulation of a three-dimensional anomaly// Phys. Rev. Lett. 1984, v.53, N26, p. 2449-2452; P.R. Wallace. The band theory of graphite//Phys. Rev. 1947, v.71, N9, p. 622-634. 3. K.S. Novoselov, A.K. Geim, S.V. Moro- zov, D. Jaing, M. I. Katsnelson, I.V. Grig- orieva, S.V. Dubonos, and A.A. Firsov. Two- dimensional gas of massless Dirac fermions in graphene// Nature. 2005, v.438, N7065, p. 197- 200. 4. Y. Zhang, Y.W. Tan, H.L. Störmer, and P. Kim. Experimental observation of the quantum Hall effect and Berry’s phase in graphene// Nature. 2005, v.438, N7065, p. 201-204. 5. V.P. Gusynin and S.G. Sharapov. Unconven- tional integer quantum Hall effect in graphene// Phys. Rev. Lett. 2005, v.95, N14, p. 14680. 6. V.P. Gusynin and S.G. Sharapov. Transport of Dirac quasiparticles in graphene: Hall and op- tical conductivities// Phys. Rev. B. 2006, v.73, N24, p. 245411. 7. N.M.R. Peres, F. Guinea, and A.H. Castro Neto. Electronic properties of disordered two- dimensional carbon // Phys. Rev. B. 2006, v.73, N24, p.125411. 8. P.I. Fomin, V.P. Gusynin, and V.A. Miransky. Vacuum Instability of Massless Electrodynamics and the Gell-Mann-Low Eigenvalue Condition for the Bare Coupling Constant // Phys. Lett. B. 1978, v.78 N1, p. 136-139. 9. P.I. Fomin, V.P. Gusynin, V.A. Miransky, and Yu.A. Sitenko. Dynamical Symmetry Breaking and Particle Mass Generation in Gauge Field Theories // Rivista Nuovo Cimento. 1983, v.6, N5, p. 1-90. 10. A.F. Young, P. Kim. Quantum interference and Klein tunnelling in graphene heterojunctions // Nature Physics 2009, v.5, N3, p. 222-226. 11. Y. Wang, V.W. Brar, A.V. Shytov, Q. Wu, W. Regan, H.Z. Tsai, A. Zett, L.S. Levitov, and M.F. Crommie. Mapping Dirac quasiparticles near a single Coulomb impurity on graphene// Nature Physics. 2012, v.8, N9, p. 653-657. 12. D.V. Khveshchenko. Ghost Excitonic Insulator Transition in Layered Graphite// Phys. Rev. Lett. 2001, v.87 N24, p. 246802. 13. E.V. Gorbar, V.P. Gusynin, V.A. Miransky, and I.A. Shovkovy. Magnetic field driven metal- insulator phase transition in planar systems// Phys. Rev. B. 2002, v.66, N4, p. 045108. 14. Y. Nambu and G. Jona-Lasinio. Dynamical model of elementary particles based on an anal- ogy with superconductivity. I // Phys. Rev. 1961, v.122, N1, p. 345-358. 33 15. V. Weisskopf. On the Self-Energy and the Elec- tromagnetic Field of the Electron// Phys. Rev. 1939, v.56, N1, p. 72-85. 16. P.I. Fomin. Some Questions of the Quan- tum Electrodynamics of Small Distances//Elem. Part. Nuclei. 1976, v.7, N3, p. 687-725. 17. P.I. Fomin, V.P. Gusynin, V.A. Miransky. Vac- uum instability of massless electrodynamics and the Gell-Mann-Low eigenvalue condition for the bare coupling constant// Phys. Lett. B. 1978, v.78, N1, p. 136-139. 18. V.P. GusyninVacuum polarization and dynam- ical symmetry breaking in quantum electrody- namics// Mod. Phys. Lett. A. 1990, v.5, N2, p. 133-142. 19. V.P. Gusynin, V.A. Miransky, and I.A. Shovkovy. Catalysis of dynamical flavor symmetry breaking by a magnetic field in 2+1 dimensions// Phys. Rev. Lett. 1994, v.73, N26, p. 3499-3502. 20. V.P. Gusynin, V.A. Miransky, and I.A. Shovkovy. Dimensional reduction and catalysis of dynam- ical symmetry breaking by a magnetic field// Nucl. Phys. B. 1996, v.462, N2-3, p. 249-290. 21. S.Y. Zhou, G.H. Gweon, A.V. Fedorov, P.N. First, W.A. DeHeer, D.H. Lee, F. Guinea A.H. Castro Neto and A. Lanzara. Substrate- induced band gap opening in epitaxial graphene // Nature Mat. 2007, v. 6 N10, p. 770-775. 22. O.V. Gamayun, E.V. Gorbar, and V.P. Gusynin. Supercritical Coulomb center and excitonic in- stability in graphene// Phys. Rev. B. 2009, v.80, N16, p. 165429. 23. O.V. Gamayun, E.V. Gorbar, and V.P. Gusynin. Gap generation and semimetal-insulator phase transition in graphene// Phys. Rev. B. 2010, v.81, N7, p. 075429. 24. J. Drut, T. Lahde. Is Graphene in Vacuum an Insulator? // Phys. Rev. Lett. 2009, v.102, N2, p. 026802; J. Drut, T. Lahde. Critical exponents of the semimetal-insulator transition in graphene: A Monte Carlo study// Phys. Rev. B. 2009, v.79, N24, p. 241405. 25. R.D. Peccei. New phase for an old phase? // Nature. 1988, v.332, N6164, p. 492-493. 26. A.S. Mayorov, D.C. Elias, I.S. Mukhin, S.V. Mo- rozov, L.A. Ponomarenko, K.S. Novoselov, A.K. Geim, R.V. Gorbachev. How close can one approach the Dirac point in graphene experimen- tally?// Nano Lett. 2012, 12(9), p.4629-4634. 27. J. Gonzalez. Electron self-energy effects on chiral symmetry breaking in graphene. // Phys. Rev. B. 2012, v.85, N8, p. 085420. ГРАФЕН И КВАНТОВАЯ ЭЛЕКТРОДИНАМИКА В.П. Гусынин Одноатомный слой углерода, графен, обладает низкоэнергетическими безщелевыми квазичастичными возбуждениями, которые в континуальном приближении описываются квантовой электродинамикой в размерности 2 + 1. Дираковский характер заряженных носителей в графене приводит ко многим уни- кальным электронным свойствам, имеющим важное значение для применений в электронных устрой- ствах. Мы исследуем открытие щели в графене, следуя идеям, предложенным П.И. Фоминым для исследования нарушения киральной симметрии и генерации масс частиц в квантовой теории поля. ГРАФЕН I КВАНТОВА ЕЛЕКТРОДИНАМIКА В.П. Гусинiн Одноатомний шар вуглецю, графен, має низькоенергетичнi безщiлиннi квазiчастинковi збудження, якi в континуальному наближеннi описуються квантовою електродинамiкою в розмiрностi 2+1. Дiра- кiвський характер заряджених носiїв у графенi призводить до багатьох унiкальних електронних вла- стивостей, що мають важливе значення для застосувань в електронних пристроях. Ми дослiджуємо вiдкриття щiлини в графенi, слiдуючи iдеям, запропонованим П.I. Фомiним для дослiдження пору- шення киральної симетрiї i генерацiї мас частинок у квантовiй теорiї поля. 34