Areas of applicability of kinematic and dynamic theories of parametric X-ray radiation

The areas of applicability of kinematic and dynamic theories of parametric X-ray radiation (PXR) of relativistic particles in a crystal are considered. It is shown that dynamic diffraction of the PXR is possible in crystallographic planes with low Miller indexes in the central part of the PXR reflec...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Вопросы атомной науки и техники
Date:2015
Main Author: Shchagin, A.V.
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Національний науковий центр «Харківський фізико-технічний інститут» НАН України 2015
Subjects:
Online Access:https://nasplib.isofts.kiev.ua/handle/123456789/112229
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Journal Title:Digital Library of Periodicals of National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine
Cite this:Areas of applicability of kinematic and dynamic theories of parametric X-ray radiation / A.V. Shchagin // Вопросы атомной науки и техники. — 2015. — № 4. — С. 86-88. — Бібліогр.: 20 назв. — англ.

Institution

Digital Library of Periodicals of National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine
_version_ 1860033270023979008
author Shchagin, A.V.
author_facet Shchagin, A.V.
citation_txt Areas of applicability of kinematic and dynamic theories of parametric X-ray radiation / A.V. Shchagin // Вопросы атомной науки и техники. — 2015. — № 4. — С. 86-88. — Бібліогр.: 20 назв. — англ.
collection DSpace DC
container_title Вопросы атомной науки и техники
description The areas of applicability of kinematic and dynamic theories of parametric X-ray radiation (PXR) of relativistic particles in a crystal are considered. It is shown that dynamic diffraction of the PXR is possible in crystallographic planes with low Miller indexes in the central part of the PXR reflection only, where the PXR yield is weak and masked by other kinds of diffracted radiation. Therefore the properties of the PXR reflection are well described by the kinematic PXR theory. Results of the analysis are compared to experimental data. Аналізуються області застосовності кінематичної та динамічної теорій параметричного рентгенівського випромінювання (ПРВ) релятивістських частинок у кристалі. Показано, що динамічна дифракція ПРВ можлива тільки на кристалографічних площинах з малими індексами Міллера і тільки в центральній області рефлексу ПРВ, де вихід ПРВ малий і маскується іншими видами, що піддалися дифракції, випромінювань. Тому властивості випромінювання в рефлексі ПРВ добре описуються кінематичною теорією ПРВ. Результати аналізу порівнюються з експериментальними даними. Анализируются области применимости кинематической и динамической теорий параметрического рентгеновского излучения (ПРИ) релятивистских частиц в кристалле. Показано, что динамическая дифракция ПРИ возможна только на кристаллографических плоскостях с малыми индексами Миллера и только в центральной области рефлекса ПРИ, где выход ПРИ мал и маскируется другими видами подвергшихся дифракции излучений. Поэтому свойства излучения в рефлексе ПРИ хорошо описываются кинематической теорией ПРИ. Результаты анализа сравниваются с экспериментальными данными.
first_indexed 2025-12-07T16:53:11Z
format Article
fulltext ISSN 1562-6016. ВАНТ. 2015. №4(98) 86 AREAS OF APPLICABILITY OF KINEMATIC AND DYNAMIC THEORIES OF PARAMETRIC X-RAY RADIATION A.V. Shchagin1,2 1National Science Center “Kharkov Institute of Physics and Technology”, Kharkov, Ukraine; 2Belgorod State University, Belgorod, Russia E-mail: shchagin@kipt.kharkov.ua The areas of applicability of kinematic and dynamic theories of parametric X-ray radiation (PXR) of relativistic particles in a crystal are considered. It is shown that dynamic diffraction of the PXR is possible in crystallographic planes with low Miller indexes in the central part of the PXR reflection only, where the PXR yield is weak and masked by other kinds of diffracted radiation. Therefore the properties of the PXR reflection are well described by the kinematic PXR theory. Results of the analysis are compared to experimental data. PACS: 41.60.-m, 61.80.Cb INTRODUCTION Radiation of fast particles in a medium with periodi- cally varying permittivity was first considered in [1]. Later, the kinematic theory of such radiation produced by relativistic particles moving in a crystal was pro- posed in [2]. In modern literature this radiation is names as parametric X-ray radiation (PXR). Therefore we will use this term in the present paper. The PXR reflection is emitted by relativistic charged particles moving inside a crystal, the energy and the direction of the PXR propa- gation in the PXR reflection are close to conditions of the X-rays diffraction. Therefore shortly after [2], the dynamic PXR theory that takes into account the diffrac- tion of the PXR in a crystal was proposed in refs. [3, 4]. According to the dynamic PXR theory, the PXR under- goes to diffraction at the same family of crystallograph- ic planes were it is was produced and can be emitted in the vicinity of the velocity vector of incident particle. In the experimental researches (see reviews [5, 6] and also [7 - 12]), the main properties of observed PXR in the PXR reflection were well described by the kinematic PXR theory, meanwhile the dynamic PXR in forward direction was not observed. However, discussions about existence and possibilities of observation of the dynam- ic PXR were continued, see e.g. [13 - 16] and brief re- view of the discussions in [17]. At last, weak spectral peaks of diffracted PXR were observed in narrow angu- lar range in the vicinity of the incident particles velocity vector V  . Below we will discuss conditions, when the dynamic PXR diffraction is sufficient and when the kin- ematic approach is enough for description of properties of radiation in the PXR reflection. 1. THE PXR FREQUENCY AND THE BRAGG FREQUENCY The frequency of the PXR spectral peak PXRω [2, 7] 1 sin 1 cosPXR Vg V c εω φ θ −  ⋅ = ⋅ ⋅ ⋅ −     (1) is some different from the Bragg frequency Bω in the crystal in the same direction 2 2B cg g ω ε = Ω⋅   , (2) where g is the module of the reciprocal lattice vector; ε is the permittivity in the crystal; φ is the angle between the particle velocity vector V  and the crystallographic planes; θ is the angle between the observation direction and the particle velocity vector V  ; Ω  is the unit vector in the direction of the PXR emission. Explicit expres- sion for normalized difference of Bragg (2) and PXR (1) frequencies in approximation of small angles ||, 1δ δ⊥ << in the vicinity of the PXR reflection center has been derived in [19] 2 22 2 0 2 24sin 4sin effB PXR PXR γ ηγ χ ηω ω ω φ φ −− ++ +− ≈ = , (3) where 2 2 ||η δ δ⊥= + is the angle of declining from the center of the PXR reflection in arbitrary direction. One can see from (3) that the PXR frequency is always be- low of the Bragg frequency and the difference of fre- quencies is minimal in the area of the center of the PXR reflection at η = 0, where the PXR yield is close to zero. In the area of the maximal PXR yield at 1 effη γ −= , the difference of frequencies (3) is 2 22sin effγ φ − . The difference of frequencies (3) quickly increases at further increasing of the angle η of declining from the center of the PXR reflection. 2. CONDITIONS FOR DYNAMIC DIFFRACTION OF THE X-RAY RADIATION It is known that the effective dynamic X-ray diffrac- tion is possible in the case when the monochromatic X-ray beam declines from the exact Bragg direction within the angular limits sin 2 gC χ ϑ φ ∆ = ± , (4) where C is the coefficient equal to unity for perpendicu- lar ( )σ polarization and cos2φ for parallel ( )π po- larization of radiation, gχ is the Fourier component of dielectric susceptibility, and quickly reduces outside the limits (4), see [20]. In our case of fixed direction of ra- diation corresponding limits of the deviation of X-ray radiation frequency can be found by the differentiation of the Bragg law. They are ISSN 1562-6016. ВАНТ. 2015. №4(98) 87 22sin gB B C χω ω φ ∆ = ± . (5) 3. CONDITIONS FOR DIFFRACTION OF THE PXR Comparing (3) and (5), let us estimate conditions when the effective manifestations of the PXR diffraction are possible. They are possible in the case when the devi- ation of the PXR frequency (3) are within limits (5), at 1 B PXR PXR B B ω ω ω ω ω − ≤ ∆ . (6) Inserting (3) and (5) into (6), we obtain estimation of the angular size of the central part of the PXR reflection Dσ , where effective manifestations of the PXR dynam- ic diffraction are possible 1 2 2 1g D eff eff C χ η σ γ γ − −≤ = − . (7) The condition for existence of such angular area is the positive sign of the radicand in eq. (7) 22 g effC χ γ −> . (8) It is interesting that both the condition for existence of the PXR diffraction (8) and the angular size of the central part in the PXR reflection where the diffraction is possible (7) are independent of the direction of the PXR reflection emission. Below we will consider the most favorable for existence of the dynamic diffraction case of high enough incident particles energy, when one can neglect the value 2γ − in comparison to 0χ , in other words at brightly expressed longitudinal Ter- Mikaelian density effect [2, 8, 13] 2 0γ χ− << . (9) At condition (9), the angular size of the PXR reflec- tion 1 0effγ χ− = does not depend on the incident parti- cle energy, the estimation of the angular size of the cen- tral area σ (7) depends on the crystal properties and polarization only 0 0 2 1gC χ η σ χ χ ≤ = − , (10) and condition (8) takes the shape 02 gC χ χ> . (11) Note that always Dσ σ> . The angular size of the area (10) can be expressed (normalized) in units of the angular size of the PXR reflection 0χ . 00 2 1g N C χσσ χχ = = − . (12) One can consider the inequalities (8) and (11) as an estimations criterion for choose of the crystallographic plane where the PXR dynamical diffraction is possible. One can use the expressions (7), (10), (12) for estima- tion of the angular size of the central part in the PXR reflection, where the dynamical diffraction is possible. Note, that less expressed effects of dynamical diffrac- tion and increased radiation attenuation are possible in the vicinity of the merges of the angular area (7), (10), (12) as well as the manifestations of the secondary max- ima of pendulous solution in the vicinity of the area in thin crystals. 4. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION Below we will consider the case of perpendicular polarization at 1C = . In this case the condition for ex- istence of the PXR diffraction (11) and angular size of the central part (12) depend on crystal properties only, 02 gχ χ> , (13) 00 2 1g N χσσ χχ = = − . (14) The most popular crystal in experimental studies of the PXR is the Si singlecrystal. Therefore let us perform estimations for this crystal. Calculations show that at PXR frequencies exceeding atomic frequencies and out of resonance frequencies the condition (13) is fulfilled for three crystallographic planes with non-zero structure factors − (111), (220) and (400) only, and the angular size of the area Nσ (14) is 0.275, 0.45 and 0.077 of the angular part of the PXR reflection angular size respec- tively. This means that small central angular part of the PXR reflection only, where the PXR yield is minimal, can be diffracted. Similar situation is realized for Ge singlecrystal, where the angular size of the field Nσ (14) is 0.47, 0.67, 0.45 and 0.18 for crystallographic planes with non-zero structure factors satisfying to con- dition (13) – they are crystallographic planes (111), (220), (400) and (422) respectively. One can expect the most prominent manifestations of the PXR diffraction are possible from crystallographic planes (220) in both crystals. The situation with other crystals demands of separate analysis. Experiments for observation of two-dimensional an- gular distribution of the yield in the PXR reflection from Si crystal (220) crystallographic plane were per- formed in refs. [10, 12]. In both research main proper- ties of the PXR reflection are well described by the kin- ematic PXR theory and any manifestations of the dy- namic phenomena were not found. However, this does not exclude the possibility of diffraction in forward di- rection of some part of radiation from the central area of the PXR reflection. The diffracted PXR from the Si (111) crystallo- graphic plane has been observed in ref. [17]. The dif- fracted PXR has been observed in forward direction in the angular range about 00.36 χ± relative to the inci- dent particles velocity vector (see Fig. 3 in ref. [17]). These angles are close to above obtained estimation of the angular range for Si (111) plane 00.275 χ± . It is evident that the kinematic theory can not de- scribe properties of the PXR that is diffracted in forward ISSN 1562-6016. ВАНТ. 2015. №4(98) 88 direction and has been observed in refs. [17, 18]. The manifestations of the dynamical effects in the central area of the PXR reflection are unnoticeable because of the low PXR intensity in this area and masking influ- ence of other kinds of diffracted radiation, like as transi- tion radiation at entrance surface of the crystal and bremsstrahlung radiation in the crystal. Therefore the effects of diffracted PXR should be weakly expressed in the experiments on observation of the PXR reflection and properties of the PXR reflection are well described by the kinematic PXR theory. Note, that the PXR fre- quency and the frequency of other kinds of diffracted radiations are close one to another but different (see eq. (3)) that gives the possibility for experimental resolving of their yields by frequency [19]. CONCLUSIONS The estimations presented in the paper show, that conditions for effective manifestations of the dynamical PXR diffraction in the considered crystals are executed for low-indexed crystallographic planes in the central area of the PXR reflection only, where the PXR yield is close to zero and masked by other types of radiation of incident particles. Therefore the influence of this phe- nomenon on the yield in the PXR reflection is insignifi- cant and the main properties of the PXR in the PXR reflection are very well described by the kinematic PXR theory. This circumstance does to exclude the existence of the diffraction of some part of the central area in the PXR reflection in forward direction that has been ob- served in papers [17, 18]. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Author is thankful to A.P. Potylitsyn for discussion of the work. The research has been performed due to the partial support by the Ministry of education and science of the Russian Federation under project 3.2009.2014/K. REFERENCES 1. Y.B. Fainberg, N.A. Khizhnyak // Sov. Phys. JETP. 1957, v. 5, p. 720. 2. M.L. Ter-Mikaelian. High-Energy Electromagnetic Processes in Condensed Media. New York: “Wiley- Interscience”, 1972. 3. V.G. Baryshevsky, I.D. Feranchuk // Sov. Phys. JETP. 1972, v. 34, p. 502. 4. G.M. Garibian, C. Yang // Sov. Phys. JETP. 1972, v. 34, p. 495. 5. A.V. Shchagin, X.K. Maruyama. Parametric X-rays. // Accelerator-Based Atomic Physics Techniques and Applications /Eds S.M. Shafroth, J.C. Austin, New York: “AIP Press”, 1997, p. 279-307. 6. A.P. Potylitsyn. Electromagnetic Radiation of Elec- trons in Periodic Structures. “Springer”, 2010. 7. A.V. Shchagin, V.I. Pristupa, N.A. Khizhnyak // Phys. Lett. 1990, v. A148, p. 485. 8. A.V. Shchagin, N.A. Khizhnyak // Nucl. Instrum. Methods. 1996, v. B119, p. 115. 9. K-H Brenzinger et al. // Phys. Rev. Lett. 1997, v. 79, p. 2462. 10. Y. Takabayashi, A.V. Shchagin // Nucl. Instrum. Methods. 2012, v. B278, p. 78. 11. B. Sones, Y. Danon, R.C. Block // Nucl. Instrum. Methods. 2005, v. B227, p. 22. 12. R.B. Fiorito, D.W. Rule, M.A. Piestrup, X.K. Maruyama, R.M. Silzer, D.M. Skopik, A.V. Shchagin // Phys. Rev. 1995 v. E51, p. R2759. 13. M.L. Ter-Mikaelian // Sov. Phys. Usp. 2001, v. 44, p. 571. 14. V.G. Baryshevsky // Nucl. Instrum. Methods. 1997, v. B122, p. 13. 15. X. Artru, P. Rullhusen // Nucl. Instrum. Methods. 1998, v. B145, p. 1, addendum ibid. 2001, v. B173, p. 16. 16. H. Nitta // J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 2000, v. 69, p. 3462. 17. H. Backe et al. // Nucl. Instrum. Methods. 2005, v. B234, p. 138. 18. A.N. Aleinik et al. // JETP Lett. 2004, v. 80, p. 339. 19. A.V. Shchagin // Journal of Kharkiv National Uni- versity. Physical series “Nuclei, Particles, Fields”. 2008, № 3/39, p. 91. 20. Z.G. Pinsker Dynamical Scattering of X-Rays in Crystals. New York: Springer, 1978. Article received 02.06.2015 ОБЛАСТИ ПРИМЕНИМОСТИ КИНЕМАТИЧЕСКОЙ И ДИНАМИЧЕСКОЙ ТЕОРИЙ ПАРАМЕТРИЧЕСКОГО РЕНТГЕНОВСКОГО ИЗЛУЧЕНИЯ А.В. Щагин Анализируются области применимости кинематической и динамической теорий параметрического рент- геновского излучения (ПРИ) релятивистских частиц в кристалле. Показано, что динамическая дифракция ПРИ возможна только на кристаллографических плоскостях с малыми индексами Миллера и только в цен- тральной области рефлекса ПРИ, где выход ПРИ мал и маскируется другими видами подвергшихся дифрак- ции излучений. Поэтому свойства излучения в рефлексе ПРИ хорошо описываются кинематической теорией ПРИ. Результаты анализа сравниваются с экспериментальными данными. ОБЛАСТІ ЗАСТОСОВНОСТІ КІНЕМАТИЧНОЇ ТА ДИНАМІЧНОЇ ТЕОРІЙ ПАРАМЕТРИЧНОГО РЕНТГЕНІВСЬКОГО ВИПРОМІНЮВАННЯ А.В. Щагин Аналізуються області застосовності кінематичної та динамічної теорій параметричного рентгенівського випромінювання (ПРВ) релятивістських частинок у кристалі. Показано, що динамічна дифракція ПРВ мож- лива тільки на кристалографічних площинах з малими індексами Міллера і тільки в центральній області ре- флексу ПРВ, де вихід ПРВ малий і маскується іншими видами, що піддалися дифракції, випромінювань. Тому властивості випромінювання в рефлексі ПРВ добре описуються кінематичною теорією ПРВ. Результа- ти аналізу порівнюються з експериментальними даними. E-mail: shchagin@kipt.kharkov.ua А.В. Щагин А.В. Щагин
id nasplib_isofts_kiev_ua-123456789-112229
institution Digital Library of Periodicals of National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine
issn 1562-6016
language English
last_indexed 2025-12-07T16:53:11Z
publishDate 2015
publisher Національний науковий центр «Харківський фізико-технічний інститут» НАН України
record_format dspace
spelling Shchagin, A.V.
2017-01-18T19:51:53Z
2017-01-18T19:51:53Z
2015
Areas of applicability of kinematic and dynamic theories of parametric X-ray radiation / A.V. Shchagin // Вопросы атомной науки и техники. — 2015. — № 4. — С. 86-88. — Бібліогр.: 20 назв. — англ.
1562-6016
PACS: 41.60.-m, 61.80.Cb
https://nasplib.isofts.kiev.ua/handle/123456789/112229
The areas of applicability of kinematic and dynamic theories of parametric X-ray radiation (PXR) of relativistic particles in a crystal are considered. It is shown that dynamic diffraction of the PXR is possible in crystallographic planes with low Miller indexes in the central part of the PXR reflection only, where the PXR yield is weak and masked by other kinds of diffracted radiation. Therefore the properties of the PXR reflection are well described by the kinematic PXR theory. Results of the analysis are compared to experimental data.
Аналізуються області застосовності кінематичної та динамічної теорій параметричного рентгенівського випромінювання (ПРВ) релятивістських частинок у кристалі. Показано, що динамічна дифракція ПРВ можлива тільки на кристалографічних площинах з малими індексами Міллера і тільки в центральній області рефлексу ПРВ, де вихід ПРВ малий і маскується іншими видами, що піддалися дифракції, випромінювань. Тому властивості випромінювання в рефлексі ПРВ добре описуються кінематичною теорією ПРВ. Результати аналізу порівнюються з експериментальними даними.
Анализируются области применимости кинематической и динамической теорий параметрического рентгеновского излучения (ПРИ) релятивистских частиц в кристалле. Показано, что динамическая дифракция ПРИ возможна только на кристаллографических плоскостях с малыми индексами Миллера и только в центральной области рефлекса ПРИ, где выход ПРИ мал и маскируется другими видами подвергшихся дифракции излучений. Поэтому свойства излучения в рефлексе ПРИ хорошо описываются кинематической теорией ПРИ. Результаты анализа сравниваются с экспериментальными данными.
Author is thankful to A.P. Potylitsyn for discussion of the work. The research has been performed due to the partial support by the Ministry of education and science of the Russian Federation under project 3.2009.2014/K
en
Національний науковий центр «Харківський фізико-технічний інститут» НАН України
Вопросы атомной науки и техники
Релятивистская электроника
Areas of applicability of kinematic and dynamic theories of parametric X-ray radiation
Області застосовності кінематичної та динамічної теорій параметричного рентгенівського випромінювання
Области применимости кинематической и динамической теорий параметрического рентгеновского излучения
Article
published earlier
spellingShingle Areas of applicability of kinematic and dynamic theories of parametric X-ray radiation
Shchagin, A.V.
Релятивистская электроника
title Areas of applicability of kinematic and dynamic theories of parametric X-ray radiation
title_alt Області застосовності кінематичної та динамічної теорій параметричного рентгенівського випромінювання
Области применимости кинематической и динамической теорий параметрического рентгеновского излучения
title_full Areas of applicability of kinematic and dynamic theories of parametric X-ray radiation
title_fullStr Areas of applicability of kinematic and dynamic theories of parametric X-ray radiation
title_full_unstemmed Areas of applicability of kinematic and dynamic theories of parametric X-ray radiation
title_short Areas of applicability of kinematic and dynamic theories of parametric X-ray radiation
title_sort areas of applicability of kinematic and dynamic theories of parametric x-ray radiation
topic Релятивистская электроника
topic_facet Релятивистская электроника
url https://nasplib.isofts.kiev.ua/handle/123456789/112229
work_keys_str_mv AT shchaginav areasofapplicabilityofkinematicanddynamictheoriesofparametricxrayradiation
AT shchaginav oblastízastosovnostíkínematičnoítadinamíčnoíteoríiparametričnogorentgenívsʹkogovipromínûvannâ
AT shchaginav oblastiprimenimostikinematičeskoiidinamičeskoiteoriiparametričeskogorentgenovskogoizlučeniâ