Theory of quantum transport in Josephson junctions with a ferromagnetic insulator

We investigate the Josephson transport through ferromagnetic insulators (FIs) by taking into account the band structure of FIs explicitly. Using the recursive Green's function method, we found the formation of a π-junction in such systems. Moreover the atomic-scale 0–π oscillation is induced by...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Физика низких температур
Date:2010
Main Authors: Kawabata, S., Asano, Y.
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Фізико-технічний інститут низьких температур ім. Б.І. Вєркіна НАН України 2010
Subjects:
Online Access:https://nasplib.isofts.kiev.ua/handle/123456789/117516
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Journal Title:Digital Library of Periodicals of National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine
Cite this:Theory of quantum transport in Josephson junctions with a ferromagnetic insulator / S. Kawabata, Y. Asano // Физика низких температур. — 2010. — Т. 36, № 10-11. — С. 1143–1148. — Бібліогр.: 62 назв. — англ.

Institution

Digital Library of Periodicals of National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine
_version_ 1859826743751213056
author Kawabata, S.
Asano, Y.
author_facet Kawabata, S.
Asano, Y.
citation_txt Theory of quantum transport in Josephson junctions with a ferromagnetic insulator / S. Kawabata, Y. Asano // Физика низких температур. — 2010. — Т. 36, № 10-11. — С. 1143–1148. — Бібліогр.: 62 назв. — англ.
collection DSpace DC
container_title Физика низких температур
description We investigate the Josephson transport through ferromagnetic insulators (FIs) by taking into account the band structure of FIs explicitly. Using the recursive Green's function method, we found the formation of a π-junction in such systems. Moreover the atomic-scale 0–π oscillation is induced by increasing the thickness of FI and its oscillation period is universal, i.e., just single atomic layer. Based on these results, we show that stable π-state can be realized in junctions based on high-Tc superconductors with La₂BaCuO₅ barrier. Such FI-based Josephson junctions may become an element in the architecture of future quantum computers.
first_indexed 2025-12-07T15:29:26Z
format Article
fulltext © Shiro Kawabata and Yasuhiro Asano, 2010 Fizika Nizkikh Temperatur, 2010, v. 36, Nos. 10/11, p. 1143–1148 Theory of quantum transport in Josephson junctions with a ferromagnetic insulator Shiro Kawabata Nanosystem Research Institute (NRI), National Institute of Advanced Industrial Science and Technology (AIST), Tsukuba, Ibaraki 305-8568, Japan E-mail: s-kawabata@aist.go.jp CREST, Japan Science and Technology Corporation (JST), Kawaguchi, Saitama 332-0012, Japan Yasuhiro Asano Department of Applied Physics, Hokkaido University, Sapporo 060-8628, Japan Received April 5, 2010 We investigate the Josephson transport through ferromagnetic insulators (FIs) by taking into account the band structure of FIs explicitly. Using the recursive Green's function method, we found the formation of a π-junction in such systems. Moreover the atomic-scale 0–π oscillation is induced by increasing the thickness of FI and its oscillation period is universal, i.e., just single atomic layer. Based on these results, we show that stable π-state can be realized in junctions based on high-Tc superconductors with La2BaCuO5 barrier. Such FI-based Joseph- son junctions may become an element in the architecture of future quantum computers. PACS: 74.50.+r Tunneling phenomena; point contacts, weak links, Josephson effects; 72.25.–b Spin polarized transport; 85.75.–d Magnetoelectronics; spintronics: devices exploiting spin polarized transport or integrated magnetic fields; 03.67.Lx Quantum computation architectures and implementations. Keywords: ferromagnetic insulator, Josephson junction, superconductor. 1. Introduction There is an increasing interest in the novel properties of interfaces and junctions of superconductors and ferromag- netic materials [1,2]. One of the most interesting effects is the formation of a Josephson π-junction in superconduc- tor/ferromagnetic-metal/superconductor (S/FM/S) hetero- structures [3]. In the ground-state phase difference between two coupled superconductors is π instead of 0 as in the ordinary 0-junctions. In terms of the Josephson relation- ship = sin ,J cI I φ (1) where φ is the phase difference between the two super- conductor layers, a transition from the 0 to π states implies a change in sign of cI from positive to negative. Such a negative cI was originally found in the Josephson effect with a spin-flip process [4–6]. In S/FM/S junctions, such a sign change of cI is a consequence of a phase change in the pairing wave-function induced in the FM layer due to the proximity effect. The existence of the π-junction in S/FM/S systems has been confirmed in experiment by Ryanzanov et al. [7] and Kontos et al. [8]. Recently, a quiet qubit consisting of a superconducting loop with a S/FM/S π-junction has been proposed [9–11]. In the quiet qubit, a quantum two-level system (qubit) is spontaneously generated and therefore it is expected to be robust to the decoherence by the fluctuation of the external magnetic field. From the viewpoint of the quantum dissipa- tion, however, the structure of S/FM/S junctions is inhe- rently identical with S/N/S junctions (N is a normal non- magnetic metal). Thus a gapless quasiparticle excitation in the FM layer is inevitable. This feature gives a strong dis- sipative effect [12–14] and the coherence time of S/FM/S quiet qubits is bound to be very short. Therefore Josephson π junctions with a nonmetallic interlayers are highly de- sired for qubit application. On the other hand, a possibility of the π-junction for- mation in Josephson junctions through ferromagnetic insu- Shiro Kawabata and Yasuhiro Asano 1144 Fizika Nizkikh Temperatur, 2010, v. 36, Nos. 10/11 lators (FIs) have been theoretically predicted [15] and in- tensively analyzed by use of the quasiclassical Green's function techniques [16,17]. Recently, by extending these results, we have proposed superconducting phase [18] and flux qubits [19–21] based on S/FI/S π-junctions. Moreover we have also showed that the effect of the dissipation due to a quasi-particle excitation on macroscopic quantum tunneling is negligibly small [20]. These results clearly indicate the advantage of the FI based π-junction for qubit applications with longer coherence time. However, up to now, a simple δ -function potential [15] has been used in order to model the FI barrier. In this phe- nomenological model, the up (down) spin electrons tunnel through a positive (negative) delta-function barrier. There- fore, strictly speaking, this model describes not ferromag- netic insulators but half metals with infinitesimal thick- ness. Moreover the possibility of the π-junction formation in the finite barrier thickness case is also an unresolved problem. In order to resolve above issues, we formulate a numerical calculation method for the Josephson current through FIs by taking into account the band structure and the finite thickness of FIs explicitly. In this paper we present our recent numerical results [21–23] on the forma- tion of the π-coupling for the Josephson junction through a FIs, e.g., La2BaCuO5 and K2CuF4 and show that the me- chanism of the π-junction in such systems is in striking contrast to the conventional S/FM/S junctions. 2. Magnetic and electronic properties of ferromagnetic insulators In this section, we briefly describe the magnetic proper- ties and the electronic density of states (DOS) of FIs. The typical DOS of FI for each spin direction is shown sche- matically in Fig. 1. One of the representative material of FI is half-filled La2BaCuO5 (LBCO) [24–26]. The crystal structure of LBCO has tetragonal symmetry with space group 4 /P mbm . In 1990, Mizuno et al., found that LBCO undergoes a ferromagnetic transition at 5.2 K [24]. The exchange splitting exV is estimated to be 0.34 eV by a first-principle band calculation using the spin-polarized local density approximation [27]. Since the exchange split- ting is large and the bands are originally half-filled, the system becomes FI. An another example of FPFI is K2CuF4 compounds in which the two-dimensional Heisenberg ferromagnet is rea- lized [28,29]. The ferromagnetic behavior of this materials has been experimentally confirmed by the magnetic sus- ceptibility [30] and neutron diffraction measurements [31]. Moreover a result of the first-principle band calculation [32] indicated that K2CuF4 compounds with Jahn-Teller distortion have the electronic structure similar to Fig. 1. In the followings, we calculate the Josephson current through such FIs numerically. 3. Numerical method In this section, we develop a numerical calculation me- thod for the Josephson current of S/FI/S junctions based on the recursive Green's function technique [33–35]. Let us consider a two-dimensional tight-binding model for the S/FI/S junction as shown in Fig. 2. The vector = j m+r x y (2) points to a lattice site, where x and y are unit vectors in the x and y directions, respectively. In the y direction, we apply the periodic boundary condition for the number of lattice sites being W . Fig. 1. The density of states for each spin direction for a ferro- magnetic insulator, e.g., LBCO. exV is the exchange splitting and 8t is the band width. Fermi enerFermi energygy VVeexx 8t8t EE Fig. 2. A schematic figure of a Josephson junction through the ferromagnetic insulators on the two-dimensional tight-binding lattice. SuperconductorSuperconductor SuperconductorSuperconductorFerromagnetic insulatorFerromagnetic insulator 1 ··· L1 ··· LFF ······ yy zz m = 1m = 1 m =m = WW xx ······ j = 0j = 0 Theory of quantum transport in Josephson junctions with a ferromagnetic insulator Fizika Nizkikh Temperatur, 2010, v. 36, Nos. 10/11 1145 Electronic states in a superconductor are described by the mean-field Hamiltonian †† , , , S 1 ˆ ˆ= 2BCSH c h c c h cr r r r r r r r r r ∗ ′ ′ ′ ′ ′∈ ⎡ ⎤− +⎢ ⎥⎣ ⎦∑ % % % % † † S 1 ˆ ˆ . 2 c c c c∗ ∈ ⎡ ⎤+ Δ − Δ⎢ ⎥⎣ ⎦∑ r r r r r % % % % (3) Here , | |,1 , 0 ˆ ˆ= ( 4 ) ,s s sh t t′ ′ ′−⎡ ⎤− δ + −μ + δ σ⎣ ⎦r r r r r r (4) with ( ), ,= , ,c c c↑ ↓r r r% (5) where † ,c σr ( ,c σr ) is the creation (annihilation) operator of an electron at r with spin =σ (↑ or ↓ ), c% means the transpose of c% , and 0σ̂ is 2 2× unit matrix. The chemical potential sμ is set to be 2 st for superconductors. In super- conductors, the hopping integral st is considered among nearest neighbor sites and we choose 2ˆ ˆ= ,iΔ Δσ (6) where Δ is the amplitude of the pair potential in the s- wave or d-wave symmetry channel, and 2σ̂ is a Pauli ma- trix. We consider FIs as a barrier of the Josephson junction. The Hamiltonian of the FI barrier is given by a single-band tight-binding model as †† , , ,, , , = (4 )FIH t c c t c cr r rr r r r ′σ σ ↑↑ ′ σ − − − μ +∑ ∑ † ex ,,(4 ) ,t V c c ↓↓ + −μ +∑ rr r (7) where exV is the exchange splitting (see Fig. 1). If ex > 8V t ( ex < 8V t ), this Hamiltonian describes FI (FM). The chemical potential μ is set to be ex= 4 . 2 V tμ + (8) The Hamiltonian is diagonalized by the Bogoliubov transformation and the Bogoliubov–de Gennes equation is numerically solved by the recursive Green function method [33–35]. We calculate the Matsubara Green function in a FI region, ˆˆ ( , ) ( , ) ( , ) = , ˆ ˆ( , ) ( , ) n n n n n g f G f g ω ω ω ∗ ∗ ω ω ⎛ ⎞′ ′ ⎜ ⎟′ ⎜ ⎟′ ′− −⎝ ⎠ r r r r r r r r r r ( (9) where = (2 1)n n Tω + π (10) is the Matsubara frequency, n is an integer number, and T is a temperature. The Josephson current is given by =1 ( ) = Tr ( , ) ( , ) , W J n n mn I ietT G Gω ω ω ⎡ ⎤′ ′φ − −⎣ ⎦∑∑ r r r r ( ( (11) with =′ +r r x . The Matsubara Green function in Eq. (9) is a 4 4× matrix representing Nambu and spin spaces. Throughout this paper we fix = 0.01 cT T , where cT is the superconductor transition temperature. 4. Josephson current for low- cT superconductors In this section we show numerical results of the Joseph- son current for low-Tc superconductor/FI/low-Tc super- conductor junctions and discuss the physical origin of the π-junction formation in such systems [21–23]. In the cal- culation, we assume = st t and set = 25W , and = = 0.01s tΔ Δ . The phase diagram depending on the strength of exV ( ex0 / 8V t≤ ≤ for FM and ex / > 8V t for FI) and FL is shown in Fig. 3. The black (white) regime corresponds to the π(0)-junction, i.e., = ( ) sin .J cI I− + φ (12) In the case of FI, the π-junction can be formed. Moreover, the 0–π transition is induced by increasing the thickness of the FI barrier FL and the period of the transition is univer- sal and just single atomic layer [23]. We also found that the atomic-scale 0–π transition is also thermally stable [36]. On the her hand, in the case of FM, the oscillation period strongly depends on exV and the temperature [1,2]. A physical origin of the appearance of the π-junction and the atomic scale 0–π transition can be explained as follows [23]. In the high barrier limit ( exV t ), Joseph- son critical current is perturbatively given by [20,21] * .cI T T↓ ↑∝ (13) Here ( )T↑ ↓ is a transmission coefficient of the FI barrier for up (down) spin electron. In the case of the single-cite FI (i.e., =1FL ), the transmission coefficients are analyti- cally by use of the transfer matrix method [37–39] as Fig. 3. The phase diagram depending on the strength of exV and FL for FM ( ex0 / 8V t≤ ≤ ) and FI ex( / > 8)V t . The black and white regime correspond to the π - and 0-junction, respectively. 1212 88 44 00 11 22 33 44 55 66 FIFI FMFM LLFF VV / t / t eexx Shiro Kawabata and Yasuhiro Asano 1146 Fizika Nizkikh Temperatur, 2010, v. 36, Nos. 10/11 1 ex = ,tT V↑ α (14) 1 ex = ,tT V↓ −α (15) where 1α is a spin-independent complex number. There- fore the sigh of the critical current 2 2 1 ex | |c tI V ⎛ ⎞ ∝ − α ⎜ ⎟ ⎝ ⎠ (16) becomes negative , so the π-junction is formed in the case of single-cite FI barrier. On the other hand, the transmission coefficients for an arbitrary value of 1FL ≥ can be expressed by ex = , LF LF tT V↑ ⎛ ⎞ α ⎜ ⎟ ⎝ ⎠ (17) ex = , LF LF tT V↓ ⎛ ⎞ α −⎜ ⎟ ⎝ ⎠ (18) where LFα is a complex number. So the sign of the criti- cal current 2 2 ex ( 1) | | LF LFc LF tI V ⎛ ⎞ ∝ − α ⎜ ⎟ ⎝ ⎠ (19) becomes negative for the odd number of FL and positive for the even number of FL . Therefore we can realize the atomic-scale 0–π transition with increasing the thickness of the FI barrier FL as demonstrated in Fig. 3. 5. Josephson current for high- cT superconductors We would like to show an experimental set-up for ob- serving the π-junction using LBCO in Fig. 4. From the perspectives of the FI/superconductor interface matching and the high-temperature device-operation, the usage of high-Tc cuprate superconductors (HTSC), e.g., YBa2Cu3O7–δ and La2–xSrxCuO4 (LSCO) is desirable. Recent develop- ment of the pulsed laser deposition technique enable us to layer-by-layer epitaxial-growth of such oxide materials [40,41]. Therefore, the experimental observation of the 0–π transition by increasing the layer number of LBCO could be possible. In order to show the possibility of π-coupling in such realistic HTSC junctions, we have numerically calculated the c -axis Josephson critical current cI based on a three- dimensional tight binding model with aL and bL being the numbers of lattice sites in a and b directions [Fig. 4,a] [23,42]. In the calculation we have used a hard wall boun- dary condition for the a and b direction and taken into account the d-wave order-parameter symmetry in HTSC, i.e., = (cos cos ). 2 d x yk a k a Δ Δ − (20) The tight binding parameters t and g have been deter- mined by fitting to the first-principle band structure calcu- lations [27]. Figure 5 shows the FI thickness FL depen- dence of cI at = 0.01 cT T for a LSCO/LBCO/LSCO junction with ex / = 28V t , / = 0.6d tΔ , and = =a bL L 100= . As expected, the atomic scale 0–π transitions can be realized in such oxide-based c-axis stack junctions. The formation of the π-junction can be experimentally detected by using a HTSC ring [see Fig. 4,b]. The phase quantization condition for the HTSC ring is given by ext 1 2 0 2 = 2 ,n Φ −Φ π + φ + φ π Φ (21) where 1φ and 2φ are the phase difference across the junc- tion 1 and 2, Φ is the magnetic flux penetrating through Fig. 4. Schematic picture of c-axis stack high-Tc superconduc- tor/LBCO/high-Tc superconductor Josephson junction (a) and high-Tc ring which can be used in experimental observations of the π-junction (b). aa bb High-High- layerlayerTTcc High-High- ringringTTcc High-High- layerlayerTTcc Fig. 5. The Josephson critical current cI as a function of the FI thickness FL at = 0.01 cT T for a c-axis stack LSCO/LBCO/LSCO junction with ex / = 28V t , / = 0.6d tΔ , and = = 100a bL L . The large (small) circles indicate the π(0)- junction. 11 1010 –2–2 1010 –4–4 1010 –6–6 1010 –8–8 11 22 33 44 LLFF |I|I (L(L )/ I )/ I (1 )| (1 )| cc FF cc Theory of quantum transport in Josephson junctions with a ferromagnetic insulator Fizika Nizkikh Temperatur, 2010, v. 36, Nos. 10/11 1147 the ring, 0Φ is the flux quantum, and n is an integer. The current passed through the ring divides between the junc- tion 1 and 2, i.e., 1 1 2 2= sin sin .c cI I Iφ + φ (22) Applied external magnetic flux extΦ depletes phases 1φ and 2φ causing interference between currents through the junctions 1 and 2. For a symmetric ring with 1 2 =c c cI I I≈ and negligible geometric inductance ( = 0)L , the total critical current as a function of extΦ is given by 00 ext 0 = = 2 cos ,c c cI I Iππ ⎛ ⎞Φ π⎜ ⎟Φ⎝ ⎠ (23) for the case that FL of the both junctions are same. If FL of the junction 1(2) is even and FL of the junction 2(1) is odd, we get 0 0 ext 0 = = 2 sin .c c cI I Iπ π ⎛ ⎞Φ π⎜ ⎟Φ⎝ ⎠ (24) Therefore the critical current of a 0–π (0–0) ring has a minimum (maximum) in zero applied magnetic field [43]. Experimentally, the half-periodic shifts in the interference patterns of the HTSC ring can be used as a strong evidence of the π-junction. Such a half flux quantum shifts have been observed in a s-wave ring made with a S/FM/S [44] and a S/quantum dot/S junction [45]. It is important to note that in the case of c-axis stack HTSC Josephson junctions [46,47], no zero-energy An- dreev bound-states [48] which give a strong Ohmic dissi- pation [49–51] are formed. Moreover, the harmful influ- ence of nodal-quasiparticles due to the d -wave order- parameter symmetry on the macroscopic quantum dynam- ics in such c-axis junctions is found to be weak both theo- retically [52–56] and experimentally [57–60]. Therefore HTSC/LBCO/HTSC π-junctions would be a good candi- date for quiet qubits. 6. Summary To summarize, we have studied the Josephson effect in S/FI/S junction by use of the recursive Green's function method. We found that the π-junction and the atomic scale 0–π transition is realized in such systems. By use of the transfer matrix calculation, the origin of the π-junction formation can be attributed to the π phase difference of the spin-dependent transmission coefficient for the FI barrier. Such FI based π-junctions may become an element in the architecture of quiet qubits. We would like to point out that the π-junction can be also realized in the Josephson junction through an another type of FI, i.e., a spin-filter material, in the case of the strong hybridization between localized and conduction electrons [61,62]. It should be also note that FI materials treated in this paper can be categorized in strongly corre- lated systems. Moreover, in actual junctions, the influence of the interface roughness could be important. Therefore investigation of the atomic-scale 0–π transition in the pre- sence of the many-body and disorder effect will be also the subject of future studies. Acknowledgements This paper is based on the collaboration works with S. Kashiwaya, Y. Tanaka, and A.A. Golubov. We would like to thank J. Arts, A. Brinkman, M. Fogelström, H. Ito, T. Kato, P.J. Kelly, T. Löfwander, T. Nagahama, F. Nori, J. Pfeiffer, A.S. Vaenko, and M. Weides for useful discus- sions. This work was supported by CREST-JST, and a Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research from the Ministry of Education, Science, Sports and Culture of Japan (Grant No. 22710096). 1. A.A. Golubov, M.Y. Kupriyanov, and E. Il'ichev, Rev. Mod. Phys. 76, 411 (2004). 2. A.I. Buzdin, Rev. Mod. Phys. 77, 935 (2005). 3. A.I. Buzdin, L.N. Bulaevskii, and S.V. Panyukov, JETP Lett. 35, 178 (1982). 4. I.O. Kulik, Sov. Phys. JETP 22, 841 (1966). 5. H. Shiba and T. Soda, Prog. Theor. Phys. 41, 25 (1969). 6. L.N. Bulaevskii, V.V. Kuzii, and A.A. Sobyanin, JETP Lett. 25, 290 (1977). 7. V.V. Ryazanov, V.A. Oboznov, A.Y. Rusanov, A.V. Vere- tennikov, A.A. Golubov, and J. Aarts, Phys. Rev. Lett. 86, 2427 (2001). 8. T. Kontos, M. Aprili, J. Lesueur, F. Genкt, B. Stephanidis, and R. Boursier, Phys. Rev. Lett. 89, 137007 (2002). 9. L.B. Ioffe, V.B. Geshkenbein, M.V. Feigel'man, A.L. Fauchére, and G. Blatter, Nature 398, 679 (1999). 10. G. Blatter, V.B. Geshkenbein, and L.B. Ioffe, Phys. Rev. B63, 174511 (2001). 11. T. Yamashita, K. Tanikawa, S. Takahashi, and S. Maekawa, Phys. Rev. Lett. 95, 097001 (2005). 12. A.D. Zaikin, and S.V. Panyukov, Sov. Phys. JETP 62, 137 (1985). 13. G. Schön, and A.D. Zaikin, Phys. Rep. 198, 237 (1990). 14. T. Kato, A.A. Golubov, and Y. Nakamura, Phys. Rev. B76, 172502 (2007). 15. Y. Tanaka, and S. Kashiwaya, Physica C274, 357 (1997). 16. M. Fogelström, Phys. Rev. B62, 11812 (2000). 17. E. Zhao, T. Löfwander, and J.A. Sauls, Phys. Rev. B70, 134510 (2004). 18. S. Kawabata and A.A. Golubov, Physica E40, 386 (2007). 19. S. Kawabata, S. Kashiwaya, Y. Asano, and Y. Tanaka, Physica C437–438, 136 (2006). 20. S. Kawabata, S. Kashiwaya, Y. Asano, Y. Tanaka, and A.A. Golubov, Phys. Rev. B74, 180502(R) (2006). 21. S. Kawabata, Y. Asano, Y. Tanaka, S. Kashiwaya, and A.A. Golubov, Physica C468, 701 (2008). Shiro Kawabata and Yasuhiro Asano 1148 Fizika Nizkikh Temperatur, 2010, v. 36, Nos. 10/11 22. S. Kawabata and Y. Asano, Int. J. Mod. Phys. B23, 4329 (2009). 23. S. Kawabata, Y. Asano, Y. Tanaka, A.A. Golubov, and S. Kashiwaya, Phys. Rev. Lett. 104, 117002 (2010). 24. F. Mizuno, H. Masuda, I. Hirabayashi, S. Tanaka, M. Hase- gawa, and U. Mizutani, Nature 345, 788 (1990). 25. H. Masuda, F. Mizuno, I. Hirabayashi, and S. Tanaka, Phys. Rev. B43, 7881 (1991). 26. W. Ku, H. Rosner, W. E, Pickett, and R.T. Scalettar, Phys. Rev. Lett. 89, 167204 (2002). 27. V. Eyert, K.H. Höc, and P.S. Riseborough, Europhys. Lett. 31, 385 (1995). 28. I. de P.R. Moreira, F. Illas, C.J. Calzado, J.F. Sanz, J.P. Mal- rieu, N.B. Amor, and D. Maynau, Phys. Rev. B59, R6593 (1999). 29. I. de P.R. Moreira and F. Illas, Phys. Rev. B60, 5179 (1999). 30. I. Yamada, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 33, 979 (1972). 31. K. Hirakawa, and H. Ikeda, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 35, 1328 (1973). 32. V. Eyert and K.H. Höck, J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 5, 2987 (1993). 33. A. Furusaki, Physica B203, 214 (1994). 34. Y. Asano, Phys. Rev. B63, 052512 (2001). 35. Y. Asano, Y. Tanaka, and A.A. Golubov, Phys. Rev. Lett. 98, 107002 (2007). 36. S. Kawabata, Y. Asano, Y. Tanaka, A.A. Golubov, and S. Kashiwaya, Physica C470, 1496 (2010). 37. A. Sawada, K. Tankei, and Y. Nagaoka, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 58, 639 (1989). 38. H. Xu, Phys. Rev. B50, 8469 (1994). 39. T. Usuki, M. Saito, M. Takatsu, R.A. Keiehl, and N. Yoko- yama, Phys. Rev. B52, 8244 (1995). 40. B. Mercey, P.A. Salvador, W. Prellier, T.D. Doan, J. Wolf- man, J.F. Hamet, M. Hervieu, and B. Raveau, J. Mater. Chem. 9, 233 (1999). 41. W. Prellier, P. Lecoeur, and B. Mercey, J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 13, R915 (2001). 42. S. Kawabata, Y. Tanaka, and Y. Asano, submitted to Phy- sica E (2010), in press; doi:10.1016/j.physe.2010.07.038. 43. M. Sigrist and T.M. Rice, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 61, 4283 (1992). 44. W. Guichard, M. Aprili, O. Bourgeois, T. Kontos, J. Le- sueur, and P. Gandit, Phys. Rev. Lett. 90, 167001 (2003). 45. J.A. van Dam, Y.V. Nazarov, E.P. A.M. Bakkers, S. De Franceschi, and L.P. Kouwenhoven, Nature 442, 667 (2006). 46. R. Kleiner, F. Steinmeyer, G. Kunkel, and P. Müller, Phys. Rev. Lett. 68, 2394 (1992). 47. A.A. Yurgens, Supercond. Sci. Technol. 13, R85 (2000). 48. S. Kashiwaya and Y. Tanaka, Rep. Prog. Phys. 63, 1641 (2000). 49. S. Kawabata, S. Kashiwaya, Y. Asano, and Y. Tanaka, Phys. Rev. B72, 052506 (2005). 50. S. Kawabata, S. Kashiwaya, Y. Asano, Y. Tanaka, T. Kato, and A.A. Golubov, Supercond. Sci. Technol. 20, S6 (2007). 51. S. Kawabata, A.A. Golubov, Ariando, C.J.M. Verwijs, H. Hilgenkamp, and J.R. Kirtley, Phys. Rev. B76, 064505 (2007). 52. Y.V. Fominov, A.A. Golubov, and M. Kupriyanov, JETP Lett. 77, 587 (2003). 53. M.H.S. Amin and A.Y. Smirnov, Phys. Rev. Lett. 92, 017001 (2004). 54. S. Kawabata, S. Kashiwaya, Y. Asano, and Y. Tanaka, Phys. Rev. B70, 132505 (2004). 55. T. Umeki, T. Kato, T. Yokoyama, Y. Tanaka, S. Kawabata, and S. Kashiwaya, Physica C463–465, 157 (2007). 56. T. Yokoyama, S. Kawabata, T. Kato, and Y. Tanaka, Phys. Rev. B76, 134501 (2007). 57. K. Inomata, S. Sato, K. Nakajima, A. Tanaka, Y. Takano, H.B. Wang, M. Nagao, H. Hatano, and S. Kawabata, Phys. Rev. Lett. 95, 107005 (2005). 58. X.Y. Jin, J. Lisenfeld, Y. Koval, A. Lukashenko, A.V. Usti- nov, and P. Müller, Phys. Rev. Lett. 96, 177003 (2006). 59. T. Matsumoto, H. Kashiwaya, H. Shibata, S. Kashiwaya, S. Kawabata, H. Eisaki, Y. Yoshida, and Y. Tanaka, Super- cond. Sci. Technol. 20, S10 (2007). 60. H. Kashiwaya, T. Matsumoto, H. Shibata, S. Kashiwaya, H. Eisaki, Y. Yoshida, S. Kawabata, and Y. Tanaka, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 77, 104708 (2008). 61. S. Kawabata, Y. Asano, Y. Tanaka, and S. Kashiwaya, Phy- sica C469, 1621 (2009). 62. S. Kawabata, Y. Asano, Y. Tanaka, and S. Kashiwaya, Phy- sica E42, 1010 (2010).
id nasplib_isofts_kiev_ua-123456789-117516
institution Digital Library of Periodicals of National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine
issn 0132-6414
language English
last_indexed 2025-12-07T15:29:26Z
publishDate 2010
publisher Фізико-технічний інститут низьких температур ім. Б.І. Вєркіна НАН України
record_format dspace
spelling Kawabata, S.
Asano, Y.
2017-05-24T05:14:20Z
2017-05-24T05:14:20Z
2010
Theory of quantum transport in Josephson junctions with a ferromagnetic insulator / S. Kawabata, Y. Asano // Физика низких температур. — 2010. — Т. 36, № 10-11. — С. 1143–1148. — Бібліогр.: 62 назв. — англ.
0132-6414
PACS: 74.50.+r, 72.25.–b, 85.75.–d, 03.67.Lx
https://nasplib.isofts.kiev.ua/handle/123456789/117516
We investigate the Josephson transport through ferromagnetic insulators (FIs) by taking into account the band structure of FIs explicitly. Using the recursive Green's function method, we found the formation of a π-junction in such systems. Moreover the atomic-scale 0–π oscillation is induced by increasing the thickness of FI and its oscillation period is universal, i.e., just single atomic layer. Based on these results, we show that stable π-state can be realized in junctions based on high-Tc superconductors with La₂BaCuO₅ barrier. Such FI-based Josephson junctions may become an element in the architecture of future quantum computers.
This paper is based on the collaboration works with S. Kashiwaya, Y. Tanaka, and A.A. Golubov. We would like to thank J. Arts, A. Brinkman, M. Fogelström, H. Ito, T. Kato, P.J. Kelly, T. Löfwander, T. Nagahama, F. Nori, J. Pfeiffer, A.S. Vaenko, and M. Weides for useful discussions. This work was supported by CREST-JST, and a Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research from the Ministry of Education, Science, Sports and Culture of Japan (Grant No. 22710096).
en
Фізико-технічний інститут низьких температур ім. Б.І. Вєркіна НАН України
Физика низких температур
Quantum coherent effects in superconductors and normal metals
Theory of quantum transport in Josephson junctions with a ferromagnetic insulator
Article
published earlier
spellingShingle Theory of quantum transport in Josephson junctions with a ferromagnetic insulator
Kawabata, S.
Asano, Y.
Quantum coherent effects in superconductors and normal metals
title Theory of quantum transport in Josephson junctions with a ferromagnetic insulator
title_full Theory of quantum transport in Josephson junctions with a ferromagnetic insulator
title_fullStr Theory of quantum transport in Josephson junctions with a ferromagnetic insulator
title_full_unstemmed Theory of quantum transport in Josephson junctions with a ferromagnetic insulator
title_short Theory of quantum transport in Josephson junctions with a ferromagnetic insulator
title_sort theory of quantum transport in josephson junctions with a ferromagnetic insulator
topic Quantum coherent effects in superconductors and normal metals
topic_facet Quantum coherent effects in superconductors and normal metals
url https://nasplib.isofts.kiev.ua/handle/123456789/117516
work_keys_str_mv AT kawabatas theoryofquantumtransportinjosephsonjunctionswithaferromagneticinsulator
AT asanoy theoryofquantumtransportinjosephsonjunctionswithaferromagneticinsulator