Effective Hamiltonian and excitation spectrum of harmonically trapped bosons

An approach is proposed to obtain an effective Hamiltonian of a harmonically trapped Bose-system. Such a
 Hamiltonian is quadratic in the creation–annihilation operators and certain approximations allow to simplify
 higher (three and four operator) products to the required form. Afte...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Физика низких температур
Date:2016
Main Author: Rovenchak, A.
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Фізико-технічний інститут низьких температур ім. Б.І. Вєркіна НАН України 2016
Subjects:
Online Access:https://nasplib.isofts.kiev.ua/handle/123456789/128448
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Journal Title:Digital Library of Periodicals of National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine
Cite this:Effective Hamiltonian and excitation spectrum of harmonically trapped bosons / A. Rovenchak // Физика низких температур. — 2016. — Т. 42, № 1. — С. 49–55. — Бібліогр.: 45 назв. — англ.

Institution

Digital Library of Periodicals of National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine
_version_ 1860239931724529664
author Rovenchak, A.
author_facet Rovenchak, A.
citation_txt Effective Hamiltonian and excitation spectrum of harmonically trapped bosons / A. Rovenchak // Физика низких температур. — 2016. — Т. 42, № 1. — С. 49–55. — Бібліогр.: 45 назв. — англ.
collection DSpace DC
container_title Физика низких температур
description An approach is proposed to obtain an effective Hamiltonian of a harmonically trapped Bose-system. Such a
 Hamiltonian is quadratic in the creation–annihilation operators and certain approximations allow to simplify
 higher (three and four operator) products to the required form. After the Hamiltonian diagonalization, the expression
 for the excitation spectrum is obtained containing in particular temperature-dependent corrections. Numerical
 calculations are made for a one-dimensional system. Some prospects towards the extension of the suggested
 approach to study binary bosonic mixtures are briefly discussed.
first_indexed 2025-12-07T18:28:54Z
format Article
fulltext Low Temperature Physics/Fizika Nizkikh Temperatur, 2016, v. 42, No. 1, pp. 49–55 Effective Hamiltonian and excitation spectrum of harmonically trapped bosons Andrij Rovenchak Department for Theoretical Physics, Ivan Franko National University of Lviv 12 Drahomanov St., Lviv 79005, Ukraine E-mail: andrij.rovenchak@gmail.com Received April 3, 2015, revised July 31, 2015, published online November 23, 2015 An approach is proposed to obtain an effective Hamiltonian of a harmonically trapped Bose-system. Such a Hamiltonian is quadratic in the creation–annihilation operators and certain approximations allow to simplify higher (three and four operator) products to the required form. After the Hamiltonian diagonalization, the expres- sion for the excitation spectrum is obtained containing in particular temperature-dependent corrections. Numeri- cal calculations are made for a one-dimensional system. Some prospects towards the extension of the suggested approach to study binary bosonic mixtures are briefly discussed. PACS: 03.75.–b Matter waves; 05.30.–d Quantum statistical mechanics; 67.85.–d Ultracold gases, trapped gases. Keywords: Bose-system, excitation spectrum, harmonic traps, approximate second quantization. 1. Introduction After the discovery of the Bose–Einstein condensation (BEC) in ultracold alkali gases [1,2], studies of trapped dilute bosonic systems received a new impulse. The issue of collective excitations in such systems appeared in the focus of research immediately [3–5]. BEC in harmonic traps was discussed in particular in [6–8], with quasi-one-dimensional systems studied in [9]. Reviews on relevant quantum many-body phenomena from both experimental and theoretical points of view can be found, for instance, in [10–13]. A description of excitations in trapped bosonic systems beyond mean-field or Gross–Pitaevskii approximations cannot be considered a completely solved problem at pre- sent. Studies of excitation spectra of low-dimensional trapped bosonic systems was made, e.g., in [14,15] using also the Lieb–Liniger theory. In the analysis of Bose- condensates in optical lattices the Bose–Hubbard model is often applied [16–18]. Mathematical aspects of the Bogoliubov approximation [19] for excitation spectra of weakly-interacting bosons are discussed in [20,21]. Theo- retical description of Bogoliubov-type excitations in exciton–polariton Bose-condensates is given in [22]. Another possibility to study a trapped Bose-system us- ing the second quantization approach is addressed in this work. Certain approximations are suggested to take into consideration items in the Hamiltonian beyond quadratic in the creation–annihilation operators. The obtained effective excitation spectrum contains in particular temperature- dependent corrections. Such an approach correlates with the Hartree–Fock– Bogoliubov (HFB) approximation and its extensions. A gapeless modification was proposed in [23] for homoge- nous Bose-condensates. Analysis of transport properties of Bose-condensates in mesoscopic waveguides was given in [24]. Bosons in random potentials were studied in [25], see also [26] for a comprehensive review containing, in partic- ular, analysis of the HFB approximation in the nonuniform case and its generalizations. The density-functional theory to study Bose-condensates at finite temperatures was ap- plied in [27]. Thermodynamic properties of a Bose-gas beyond the HFB approximation were analyzed in [28] using imaginary-time Green’s functions. Hard-sphere bosonic systems were considered within a self-consistent t-matrix theory in the HFB approximation [29] and beyond [30]. Recently, the HFB approximation was applied to study phase separation in two-component Bose-condensates [31]. This approximation was also used to describe a finite- particle trapped one-dimensional Bose-system [32]. The main idea of the present work is to suggest a math- ematically simple approximation to account for higher- order corrections in the Hamiltonian. This is done in a phenomenological way by linking creation–annihilation © Andrij Rovenchak, 2016 Andrij Rovenchak operator products to the respective occupation numbers. The obtained analytical expressions might be further also used with results of more thorough derivations. The paper is organized as follows. In the next Section, the Hamiltonian of the problem is written in the second quantization formalism with some simplification made to account for a macroscopic occupation of the ground state. The diagonalization procedure leading to an effective Hamiltonian is described in Sec. 3. Numerical analysis of a one-dimensional problem is given in Sec. 4. Some pro- spects of the proposed techniques in application to binary bosonic mixtures are analyzed in Sec. 5. A brief discussion in Sec. 6 concludes the paper. 2. Hamiltonian in the second quantization formalism Let a D-dimensional system of N weakly-interacting bosons of mass m be confined to a harmonic trap ( )2 2 2 2 1 1 1( , , ) = 2D D D mV x x x xω + +ω  (1) and the potential of interatomic interaction is given by 1( , , ) = ( ),DU x x gδ x where the vector 1= ( , , )Dx xx  and g is the coupling constant. The Hamiltonian of such a system reads: 2 0 =1 1 < ˆˆ ˆ ˆ= ( ) ( ) = . 2 N i i i j i i j N H V U H U m ≤ ≤   + + − +     ∑ ∑p x x x (2) Here, ˆ ip is the momentum operator of the ith particle, ix is its coordinate. It is possible to develop the second quantization ap- proach using the eigenfunctions of the operator 0Ĥ , i. e., an ordinary D-dimensional harmonic oscillator. Let †ˆ ˆ, jja a be the creation and annihilation operators for the state 1| = | , , Dj j〉 〉j  , respectively. The correspond- ing energy levels ( )1 1= .D Dj jε ω + +ωj   (3) In this representation the Hamiltonian is † † † , , , 1ˆ ˆ ˆ ˆ ˆ ˆ ˆ= | | . 2 H a a U a a a aε + 〈 〉∑ ∑j l mkj j j j k l m j jk lm (4) The operators satisfy standard bosonic commutation relations: †ˆ ˆ, = .a a  δ j jkk (5) Following Bogoliubov [19], we assume the occupation number of the lowest state 0N is a macroscopic number. As it is an eigenvalue of the operator † 00ˆ ˆa a , one can treat † 0â and 0â as c-numbers, so that † † 0 0 0 0 00 0ˆ ˆ ˆ ˆ= , = 1 ,a a N a a N N+  † 0 0 00ˆ ˆ, .a N a N  Upon singling out items with one, two, three, and four operators with the zero index, the Hamiltonian becomes: _____________________________________________________ † † † † †3/2 0 0 0 0 , 0 ˆ ˆ ˆ ˆ ˆ ˆ ˆ ˆ ˆ= const { 0 | | 00 00 | | 0 } {4 0 | | 0 | | 00 2 N H a a N U a U a U a a U a a ≠ ≠ ≠ + ε + 〈 〉 + 〈 〉 + 〈 〉 + 〈 〉 +∑ ∑ ∑j j j k kj j j j j j j k j j j k jk 1/2 † † † † †0 , , 0 , , , 0 1ˆ ˆ ˆ ˆ ˆ ˆ ˆ ˆ ˆ ˆ ˆ ˆ00 | | } {2 | | 0 2 0 | | } | | , 2 2 N U a a U a a a U a a a U a a a a ≠ ≠ + 〈 〉 + 〈 〉 + 〈 〉 + 〈 〉∑ ∑j k l k l l mk kj j j j k l j k l m jk jk l j kl jk lm (6) ________________________________________________ where “const” denotes items of a non-operator nature. We will not neglect the terms having more than two operators with non-zero index as it is usually done in the approxi- mate second quantization, but instead will further try to take them into account in some effective manner. It was shown in [33] that items linear in †â or â pro- duce solely a constant shift of the energy levels, so one can neglect them in further analysis. Dropping also a constant term, we obtain the following Hamiltonian: † † † †0 0 , 0 ˆ ˆ ˆ ˆ ˆ ˆ ˆ ˆ ˆ= (4 ) 2 N H a a c a a a a a a ≠ ≠ ε + + + +∑ ∑j j jk k j kkj j j j j k † † †1/2 0 , , 0 ˆ ˆ ˆ ˆ ˆ ˆ( )N c a a a a a a ≠ + + +∑ jkl l k lkj j j k l † † , , , 0 1 ˆ ˆ ˆ ˆ , 2 c a a a a ≠ + ∑ jklm l mkj j k l m (7) where, recalling that the harmonic oscillator eigenfunctions are real-valued, = 0 | | 0 = | | 00 = 00 | | ,c U U U〈 〉 〈 〉 〈 〉jk j k jk jk (8) = | | 0 = 0 | | ,c U U〈 〉 〈 〉jkl jk l j kl (9) = | | .c U〈 〉jklm jk lm (10) 3. Diagonalization procedure In order to obtain a quadratic form with respect to the †â , â operators suitable for subsequent diagonalization, the following procedure might be applied. The occupation number corresponding to the state | 〉j is †ˆ ˆ= ,n a a〈 〉j jj (11) from which we can propose to make a substitution of oper- ators in items with more than two of them: 50 Low Temperature Physics/Fizika Nizkikh Temperatur, 2016, v. 42, No. 1 Effective Hamiltonian and excitation spectrum of harmonically trapped bosons † 1ˆ ˆ,x xa n a n −→ →j j jj (12) with a parameter x to be fixed later. After this procedure, we arrive at the diagonalization problem for the quadratic form of a general type ( )† † † * , ˆ ˆ ˆ ˆ ˆ ˆ ,jk k jk jk j kj j k j k A a a B a a B a a+ +∑ (13) which has been already addressed in some works [33–36]. A mathematically simpler treatment can be achieved by introducing further approximations, namely by linking the creation–annihilation operators with different indices via some factor, † †*ˆ ˆ ˆ ˆ= , = .a f a a f ak kj j kjk j (14) With correlation (12) in mind, the following expression is consistently derived: 1 *= , = . x x n nf f n n −                k k kj kj j j (15) Provided that the occupation numbers jn are real and posi- tive, so * =f fkj kj and thus = 1/2x . For brevity, the follow- ing notation will be also used below: = = .xh n nj j j (16) Three-operator items are thus substituted in the follow- ing manner † † † † † † †ˆ ˆ ˆ ˆ ˆ ˆ ˆ ˆ ˆ ˆ ˆ ˆ( ) ( ) 3 c c a a a a a a a a h a a h a a h+ → + + +jkl jkl l k l l l k l jk k kj j j j † †ˆ ˆ ˆ ˆ ˆ ˆ( ), 3 c a a h a a h a a h+ + +jkl k l l k k l jj j (17) while for the four-operator product one has † † † †ˆ ˆ ˆ ˆ ˆ ˆ ˆ ˆ( 6 c c a a a a a a h h a a h h→ + +jklm jklm l m l m l m j kk kj j † † † †ˆ ˆ ˆ ˆ ˆ ˆ ˆ ˆ ).a a h h a a h h a a h h a a h h+ + + + l l lk m m j j m m k lk kj j . (18) Taking to account the symmetry of the coefficients cjk , cjkl , and cjklm over all the indices, after simple transfor- mations described above the following effective Hamilto- nian can be written down: † eff 0 0 0 0 , 0 4ˆ ˆ ˆ= 2 3 H a a N f c N f c h ≠ ≠ ≠  ε + + +  ∑ ∑ ∑j j kj jk kj jkl lj j k k l † † 0 , , 0 0 0 1 ˆ ˆ ˆ ˆ( ) 3 2 N f c h h a a a a f c ≠ ≠ ≠   + + + +    ∑ ∑ ∑kj jklm l m j j kj jkj j k l m j k 0 , 0 , , 0 1 1 . 3 12 N f c h f c h h ≠ ≠  + +   ∑ ∑kj jkl l kj jklm l m k l k l m (19) The proposed transformation can be better illustrated using the Green’s function formalism. Consider the equa- tion of motion for the two-time temperature Green’s func- tion †ˆ ˆ|q qa a〈〈 〉〉: † †1 ˆˆ ˆ ˆ ˆ| = [ , ] | 2 a a a H aω〈〈 〉〉 + 〈〈 〉〉 = πq q q q †† † † 0 0 1 ˆ ˆ ˆ ˆ ˆ ˆ= | (2 | | ) 2 a a N c a a a a ≠ +ε 〈〈 〉〉 + 〈〈 〉〉 + 〈〈 〉〉 + π ∑q q q qk k q qk k † † † 0 , 0 ˆ ˆ ˆ ˆ ˆ ˆ(2 | | )N c a a a a a a ≠ + 〈〈 〉〉 + 〈〈 〉〉 +∑ qkl l q k l qk k l † † , , 0 ˆ ˆ ˆ ˆ| .c a a a a ≠ + 〈〈 〉〉∑ qklm l m qk k l m Using the effective Hamiltonian (19) yields instead: † † † eff 1 1ˆˆ ˆ ˆ ˆ ˆ ˆ| = [ , ]| = | 2 2 a a a H a a aω〈〈 〉〉 + 〈〈 〉〉 + ε 〈〈 〉〉 + π πq q q q q q q † † † 0 0 ˆ ˆ ˆ ˆ(2 | | )N c f a a f a a ≠ + 〈〈 〉〉 + 〈〈 〉〉 +∑ qk kq q q kq q q k † † † 0 , 0 2 ˆ ˆ ˆ ˆ(2 | | ) 3 N c f h a a f h a a ≠ + 〈〈 〉〉 + 〈〈 〉〉 +∑ qkl kq l q q kq l q q k l † † † , , 0 1 ˆ ˆ ˆ ˆ( | | ). 12 c f h h a a a a ≠ + 〈〈 〉〉 + 〈〈 〉〉∑ qklm kq l m q q q q k l m The proposed operator substitutions would thus lead to a closed set of two equations of motion (for †ˆ ˆ|a a〈〈 〉〉q q and † †ˆ ˆ|a a〈〈 〉〉q q ) by means of getting rid of the off-diagonal functions † † † 0 0 0 ˆ ˆ ˆ ˆ ˆ ˆ| | ( ) |c a a a a c f G a a ≠ ≠ 〈〈 〉〉→〈〈 〉〉 ≡ 〈〈 〉〉∑ ∑qk k q q q qk kq q q k k q as well as decoupling higher-order functions † † † , 0 ˆ ˆ ˆ ˆ ˆ| ( ) |c a a a G a a ≠ 〈〈 〉〉 → 〈〈 〉〉 +∑ qkl l q l q qk k l q † † 2 ˆ ˆ( ) | , etc.G a a+ 〈〈 〉〉q qq with coefficients 1,2 ( )G q linked to fkq and hl . The former relation can be — to a certain extent — related to the so- called quantum-number conservation condition [26] † † ,ˆ ˆ ˆ ˆ= ,a a a a〈 〉 δ 〈 〉q k q q qk while the latter is a mean-field-like approximation. A simi- lar approach proved to be successful in modeling the spec- trum of strongly interacting Bose-systems [37]. The following notations will be used below: 0 0 = ; 2 N f c ≠ γ ∑j kj jk k (20) 0 , 0 1= ; 3 N f c h ≠ η ∑j kj jkl l k l (21) Low Temperature Physics/Fizika Nizkikh Temperatur, 2016, v. 42, No. 1 51 Andrij Rovenchak , , 0 1= . 12 f c h h ≠ ϕ ∑j kj jklm l m k l m (22) The Hamiltonian is thus the quadratic form † † † eff 0 ˆ ˆ ˆ ˆ ˆ ˆ ˆ= {( 4 ) ( )}H Q a a Q a a a a ≠ ε + + +∑ j j j j j jj j j j (23) with = ,Q γ + η + ϕj j j j (24) which can be diagonalized using the standard Bogoliubov’s u–v transform. The operators in each mode (state) are expressed as † † †* *ˆ ˆ ˆ ˆˆ ˆ= , = .a u b b a u b b+ +j j j j j j jj j jv v (25) From the bosonic commutator †ˆ ˆ, = 1a a   j j (26) requiring that off-diagonal products ˆ ˆb bj j and † †ˆ ˆb bj j are eliminated in the final expressions, the Hamiltonian diagonalizes to the form † eff 0 ˆ ˆˆ = ,H E b b ≠ ∑ j jj j (27) where the elementary excitation spectrum is 2 2= 8 12 .E Q Qε + ε +j j j j j (28) Evaluation of the above expression cannot be done without specifying the functional dependence of f j and hj. On the other hand, the c coefficients (matrix elements of the po- tential energy operator) can be rewritten as follows: 1 1 1 11 = , = ,j k j k j k l j k lD D D D D c c c c c cjk jkl  1 11 1 = j k l m j k l mD D D D c c cjklm  (29) because the D-dimensional harmonic oscillator eigenfunctions are factorized into the one-dimensional ones. 4. A one-dimensional problem To provide an example of calculations with the sug- gested effective Hamiltonian, a one-dimensional problem can be considered. For the harmonic oscillator of mass m and frequency ω, the eigenfunctions are 1/4 2 /21| = e , 2 ! m x jj m mj H x j − ω  ω ω 〉     π       = 0, 1, 2, ,j  (30) where ( )jH ξ is the Hermite polynomial. Using the harmonic oscillator length ho =a mω  (31) matrix elements (8)–(10) are obtained in the form 22 ho 1 1= e ( ) ( ) 2 ! ! jk j kj k gc H H d a j k ∞ − ξ + −∞ ξ ξ ξ = π ∫ ( )/2 ho 1 ( 1) 1= . 22 ! ! j kg j k a j k −− + + Γ π   (32) 22 ho 1 1= e ( ) ( ) ( ) 2 ! ! ! jkl j k lj k l gc H H H d a j k l ∞ − ξ + + −∞ ξ ξ ξ ξ = π ∫ 2 ho 1 1 1 1= 2 2! ! !2 g j k l j k l a j k l + − + − + +   Γ Γ ×       π 1 , 2 k j l− + + ×Γ    (33) ho 1 1= 2 ! ! ! ! jklm j k l m gc a j k l m+ + + × π 22e ( ) ( ) ( ) ( )j k l mH H H H d ∞ − ξ −∞ × ξ ξ ξ ξ ξ =∫ ( )/2 ho 1 ( 1)= 2 ! ! ! ! k j m lg a j k l m − + −− × π 1 1 2 2 1 2 j k l m j k l m j k l m + + − + − + + +   Γ Γ       × × − + − + Γ    3 2 1, , ; 2 1 . 1 1, ; 2 2 k j m lj l F m j k l k j l m − + − + − −  ×   − − − + − − − +     (34) The integration can be made in a closed form as discussed, for instance, in [5,38–40]. In the above expressions, ( )zΓ is Euler’s gamma-function, and 3 2 1 2 3 1 2( , , ; , ; )F a a a b b z is the hypergeometric function. Note that indices in the c coefficients ( j k+ , j k l+ + , and j k l m+ + + ) must sum up to an even number otherwise the respective integrals are zero due to the parity property of the Hermite polynomial products. Models for kjf and jh use the occupation numbers jn : = , = .k kj j j j n f h n n (35) Generally, for harmonic oscillators 1 / 1= , e 1 j j Tn z− ω − (36) 52 Low Temperature Physics/Fizika Nizkikh Temperatur, 2016, v. 42, No. 1 Effective Hamiltonian and excitation spectrum of harmonically trapped bosons and fugacity z can be approximately put unity at low tem- peratures corresponding to the BEC regime. In the limit of Tω >> , /e .j T jn − ω  (37) In most experiments with cold atomic gases an opposite condition is satisfied, Tω << , cf. [3,41]. It leads to .j Tn jω   (38) With this simple expression we will make numerical calcu- lations below. Dependences of kjf and jh become thus: = , = .kj j j Tf h k jω (39) This means in particular that there will be no temperature dependence in jγ but corrections jη and jϕ are propor- tional to T and T , respectively. At BEC, the occupation of the lowest level 0N ap- proaches the total number of particles N , so we put 0 =N N is expressions for jγ and jη yielding ho = ,j j gN a γ γ (40) ho = ,j j g NT a η η ω (41) ho = ,j j g T a ϕ ϕ ω (42) where jγ , jη , and jϕ are dimensionless coefficients ob- tained by inserting Eqs. (32)–(34) with kjf and jh from (35) into one-dimensional analogs of Eqs. (20)–(22). Spectrum (28) in one dimension with =j jε ω be- comes 2 = 1 8 12 .j j j j j j jE j j j γ + η + ϕ γ + η + ϕ  ω + +   ω ω     (43) Upon introducing dimensionless parameters, ho 1= , = ,gN Tx y a Nω ω  (44) the spectrum yields =jE 2 = 1 8 12 .j j j j j jx x y y x x y y j j j  γ + η + ϕ γ + η + ϕ  ω + +      (45) Numerical values of jγ , jη , and jϕ are shown in Table 1. Dependences of the energies of the first three levels = 1, 2, 3j on the values of x and y parameters are shown in Fig. 1. Note that when x reaches values above 2, an intersec- tion of the energies 2E and 3E occurs. A similar behavior is possible for some other levels since jγ and jη can have both positive and negative values. Obviously, the validity of the approximation decreases for items containing jη and even more for jϕ terms be- cause of number of simplifications applied, in comparison with the jγ term. Table 1. Values of dimensionless coefficients in Eqs. (40)–(42) depending on the level number j j jγ jη jϕ 1 0,074987 0,020906 0,041237 2 0,049719 0,047775 0,073939 3 –0,067169 0,045062 0,087680 4 –0,044015 –0,022696 0,081353 5 0,041606 –0,044378 0,056191 6 0,030211 0,005830 0,036522 7 –0,023169 0,030029 0,039952 8 –0,018589 0,000509 0,049381 9 0,012314 –0,017838 0,045257 10 0,010780 –0,001987 0,035160 11 –0,006394 0,009961 0,033071 12 –0,006034 0,001827 0,036096 13 0.003288 –0,005385 0,031684 14 0,003311 –0,001339 0,031684 15 –0,001702 0,002872 0,029970 16 –0,001815 0,000955 0,030215 17 0,000929 –0,001549 0,029776 18 0.001035 –0,000784 0,028471 19 –0,000590 0,000883 0,027376 20 –0,000678 0,000844 0,026641 25 0,000843 –0,000360 0,023545 30 0,001743 –0,004430 0,023388 50 0,007818 0,000009 0,025675 100 –0,000160 0,000125 0,000214 Fig. 1. (Color online) Energies of the first three excited levels 1 2 3, ,E E E (vertical axis, in ω units) given by Eq. (45) as func- tions of the x and y parameters (44). Red surface is 1E , green sufrace is 2E , and blue surface is 3E . Grey-shaded planes corre- spond to noninteracting oscillator energies 1 4, ,ε ε . Low Temperature Physics/Fizika Nizkikh Temperatur, 2016, v. 42, No. 1 53 Andrij Rovenchak 5. A binary Bose mixture Weakly-interacting Bose mixtures confined in harmonic traps became a subject of experimental and theoretical studies recently, e. g., mixture of ytterbium bosonic iso- topes [42,43] or rubidium with some other elements [44], see also [45]. Let the system contain two boson species, a and b , be- ing characterized by coupling constants ag , bg , and abg , the latter corresponds to the inter-species interaction. The one particle problems remain the same for each species: 1 0 1 0 ˆ ˆ ˆ ˆ= ; = ,a a a b b bH H U H H U+ + (46) where the non-interacting oscillator Hamiltonians are 0 0 ˆ ˆ ˆ ˆ= ; =a a a b b bH K V H K V+ + (47) with trapping potentials ( )2 2 2 2 1 1( ) = ; 2 a a D D m V x xω + +ωx  ( )2 2 2 2 1 1( ) = 2 b b D D m V x xω + +ωx  (48) and the interaction items are = ( ); = ( ); = ( ).a a b b ab abU g U g U gδ δ δx x x (49) In the occupation number formalism we obtain: 1 1 ˆ ˆ ˆ= =a b abH H H U+ +∑ ∑ ∑ † †ˆ ˆˆ ˆ= ,n n n nn na a b ba bn na a a a b b Uε + ε +∑ ∑ (50) where the unidexed sums run over all the relevant particles and U is the total potential energy in the system. The fol- lowing Hamiltonian is thus of special interest: ( † † † † *ˆ ˆˆ ˆ ˆ ˆ ˆ ˆ ˆ= mn m n mn m n mn m n mn m n mn H A a a B b b C a a C a a′ + + + +∑ † † * † † *ˆ ˆ ˆ ˆ ˆ ˆˆ ˆmn m n mn m n mn m n mn m nD b b D b b F a b F a b+ + + + + )† * †ˆ ˆˆ ˆ ,mn m n mn m nG a b G b a+ + (51) which is obtained by getting rid of three- and four- operator products as described in Sec. 3. A diagonalized Hamiltonian † ( ) † ( ) †ˆ ˆ ˆ ˆˆ ˆ= =j j m m m n n nj j m n H E E Eα β′′ ξ ξ α α + β β∑ ∑ ∑ (52) сan be obtained by a direct application of the diagonalization procedure similar to that discussed in papers [33–36]. It is technically complicated and involves nonlinear equa- tions for infinite-size matrices; a perturbative solution might be a good alternative. On the other hand, the procedure from Sec. 3 can be applied leading to ˆˆ = ,j j H h′′ ∑ (53) where the diagonalization of the quadratic form in each mode ˆ jh is nothing but the problem reducing to a bi- quadratic equation. For a simplified expression representing a single mode † †ˆ ˆ ˆˆ ˆ= a bh a a b bε + ε + † † † † † †ˆ ˆ ˆ ˆ ˆ ˆˆ ˆ ˆ ˆ ˆ ˆ(4 ) (4 )a ba a a a aa b b b b bb+λ + + + λ + + + † †ˆ ˆˆ ˆ( ),ab a b ab+λ + (54) where aλ , bλ , and abλ are linked to interaction parameters ag , bg , and abg as well as contain some effective contribu- tions from simplifications of the original Hamiltonian, one can obtain easily two branches of the excitation spectrum: (1,2) 2= /2 /4E p p q± − (55) with 2 2 2 2 2= ( 4 ) ( 4 ) 2a a b b a b abp ε + λ + ε + λ −λ −λ + λ (56) and 2 2= ( 4 ) ( 4 )a a a aq ε + λ ε + λ − 2 2 2 2 2 2( 4 ) ( 4 )a b b b a a a b−λ ε + λ −λ ε + λ −λ λ − 2 2 42 ( 4 )( 4 ) 2 .ab a a b b a b ab ab− λ ε + λ ε + λ − λ λ λ −λ (57) 6. Discussion In summary, an approach was proposed for obtaining an effective Hamiltonian for bosonic systems in a har- monic trap. An approximation consisting in the substitu- tion of the off-diagonal creation–annihilation operator products, † †ˆ ˆ ˆ ˆa a f a a→j kj jk j and alike, gave the possibility to diagonalize the Hamiltonian in a mathematically simple fashion and to calculate the elementary excitation spec- trum. The factors fkj were related to the occupation num- bers. Other models, beyond a simple dependence in the T >> ω limit considered here, could be tested in subse- quent works. A more consistent approach to derive the expressions for hj and fkj would require solving a variational problem similar to the Gross–Pitaevskii one but being of a higher order. The most straightforward way is to make a decom- position of the operator â into a non-operator part h and a small correction α̂, that is ˆˆ =a h +α. It was not addressed in this paper due to significant mathematical complica- tions, which were in contradiction with the idea of intend- ed effective simplification of the diagonalization problem. Such a systematic analysis requires a separate study, while the results of the present paper allow for making computa- tions with different expressions for hj and fkj. 54 Low Temperature Physics/Fizika Nizkikh Temperatur, 2016, v. 42, No. 1 Effective Hamiltonian and excitation spectrum of harmonically trapped bosons Numerical calculations of the excitation spectrum for the one-dimensional systems will be further extended to higher-dimensional systems as all the analytical expres- sions were derived in this paper. Binary bosonic mixtures might be also treated using the proposed approach. The obtained excitation spectrum makes it possible to calculate the properties of the system, like energy, specific heat, and condensate fraction, using standard thermody- namic methods [33]. Carrying out such computations is more a technical task and requires specification of the sys- tem parameters, including the trap geometry for two- or three-dimensional systems. I am grateful to the anonymous Referees for useful comments and criticisms, which open a possibility to devel- op the method of the present paper on a more rigorous level. The paper is based on the research provided by the grant support of the State Fund For Fundamental Research of Ukraine, Project F-64/41-2015 (No. 0115U004838). 1. M.H. Anderson, J.N. Ensher, M.R. Matthews, C.E. Wieman, and E.A. Cornell, Science 269, 198 (1995). 2. K.B. Davis, M. Mewes, M.R. Andrews, N.J. van Druten, D.S. Durfee, D.M. Kurn, and W. Ketterle, Phys. Rev. Lett. 75, 3969 (1995). 3. D.S. Jin, J.R. Ensher, M.R. Matthews, C.E. Wieman, and E.A. Cornell, Phys. Rev. Lett. 77, 420 (1996). 4. S. Stringari, Phys. Rev. Lett. 77, 2360 (1996). 5. L. You, W. Hoston, M. Lewenstein, and M. Marinescu, Acta Phys. Polon. A 93, 211 (1998). 6. S. Grossmann and M. Holthaus, Phys. Lett. A 208, 188 (1995). 7. H. Haugerud, T. Haugset, and F. Ravndal, Phys. Lett. A 225, 18 (1997). 8. W.J. Mullin, J. Low Temp. Phys. 106, 615 (1997). 9. F. Gerbier, Europhys. Lett. 66, 771 (2004). 10. A.S. Parkins and D.F. Walls, Phys. Rep. 303, 1 (1998). 11. F. Dalfovo, S. Giorgini, L.P. Pitaevskii, and S. Stringari, Rev. Mod. Phys. 71, 463 (1999). 12. I. Bloch, J. Dalibard, and W. Zwerger, Rev. Mod. Phys. 80, 885 (2008). 13. V.S. Bagnato, D.J. Frantzeskakis, P.G. Kevrekidis, B.A. Malomed, and D. Mihalache, Rom. Rep. Phys. 67, 5 (2015). 14. C. Menotti and S. Stringari, Phys. Rev. A 66, 043610 (2002). 15. Y.-W. Luo and J.-S. Chen, Commun. Theor. Phys. 60, 673 (2013). 16. K.R.A. Hazzard and E.J. Mueller, Phys. Rev. A 76, 063612 (2007). 17. M. Yamashita, S. Kato, A. Yamaguchi, S. Sugawa, T. Fukuhara, S. Uetake, and Y. Takahashi, Phys. Rev. A 87, 041604(R) (2013). 18. I.V. Stasyuk, O.V. Velychko, and I.R. Dulepa, Ukr. J. Phys. 59, 993 (2014). 19. N.N. Bogoliubov, J. Phys. USSR 11, 23 (1947). 20. P. Grech and R. Seiringer, Commun. Math. Phys. 322, 559 (2013). 21. R. Seiringer, J. Math. Phys. 55, 075209 (2014). 22. C. Trallero-Giner, M.V. Durnev, Y. Núñez Fernández, M.I. Vasilevskiy, V. López-Richard, and A. Kavokin, Phys. Rev. B 89, 205317 (2014). 23. V.I. Yukalov and H. Kleinert, Phys. Rev. A 73, 063612 (2006). 24. T. Ernst, T. Paul, and P. Schlagheck, Phys. Rev. A 81, 013631 (2010). 25. V.I. Yukalov, E.P. Yukalova, and V.S. Bagnato, Laser Phys. 19, 686 (2009). 26. V.I. Yukalov, Phys. Part. Nucl. 42, 460 (2011). 27. N. Argaman and Y.B. Band, Phys. Rev. A 83, 023612 (2011). 28. A. Alastuey and J. Piasecki, Phys. Rev. E 84, 041122 (2011). 29. H. Kim, C.S. Kim, C.L. Huang, H.-S. Song, and X.-X. Yi, Phys. Rev. A 85, 033611 (2012). 30. H. Kim, C.-S. Kim, C.-L. Huang, H.-S. Song, and X.-X. Yi, Phys. Rev. A 85, 053629 (2012). 31. A. Roy and D. Angom, Phys. Rev. A 92, 011601 (2015). 32. X.-L. Chen, Y. Li, and H. Hu, Phys. Rev. A 91, 063631 (2015). 33. A.A. Rovenchak, J. Low Temp. Phys. 148, 411 (2007). 34. J.H.P. Colpa, Physica A 93, 327 (1978). 35. C. Tsallis, J. Math. Phys. 19, 277 (1978). 36. M. Marinescu and A.F. Starace, Phys. Rev. A 56, 570 (1997). 37. A. Rovenchak, Z. Naturforsch. A 70, 73 (2015). 38. E.C. Titchmarsh, J. London Math. Soc. s1-23, 15 (1949). 39. R.D. Lord, J. London Math. Soc. s1-24, 101 (1949). 40. S.D. Bajpai, Ann. Math. Siles. 6, 13 (1992). 41. S. Giorgini, L.P. Pitaevskii, and S. Stringari, Phys. Rev. A 54, R4633 (1996). 42. K. Kasamatsu and M. Tsubota, J. Low Temp. Phys. 150, 599 (2008). 43. R. Campbell, G.-L. Oppo, and M. Borkowski, Phys. Rev. E 91, 012909 (2015). 44. B. Pasquiou, A. Bayerle, S.M. Tzanova, S. Stellmer, J. Szczepkowski, M. Parigger, R. Grimm, and F. Schreck, Phys. Rev. A 88, 023601 (2013). 45. B. Van Schaeybroeck, Physica A 392, 3806 (2013). Low Temperature Physics/Fizika Nizkikh Temperatur, 2016, v. 42, No. 1 55 1. Introduction 2. Hamiltonian in the second quantization formalism 3. Diagonalization procedure 4. A one-dimensional problem 5. A binary Bose mixture 6. Discussion
id nasplib_isofts_kiev_ua-123456789-128448
institution Digital Library of Periodicals of National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine
issn 0132-6414
language English
last_indexed 2025-12-07T18:28:54Z
publishDate 2016
publisher Фізико-технічний інститут низьких температур ім. Б.І. Вєркіна НАН України
record_format dspace
spelling Rovenchak, A.
2018-01-09T15:39:26Z
2018-01-09T15:39:26Z
2016
Effective Hamiltonian and excitation spectrum of harmonically trapped bosons / A. Rovenchak // Физика низких температур. — 2016. — Т. 42, № 1. — С. 49–55. — Бібліогр.: 45 назв. — англ.
0132-6414
PACS: 03.75.–b, 05.30.–d, 67.85.–d
https://nasplib.isofts.kiev.ua/handle/123456789/128448
An approach is proposed to obtain an effective Hamiltonian of a harmonically trapped Bose-system. Such a&#xd; Hamiltonian is quadratic in the creation–annihilation operators and certain approximations allow to simplify&#xd; higher (three and four operator) products to the required form. After the Hamiltonian diagonalization, the expression&#xd; for the excitation spectrum is obtained containing in particular temperature-dependent corrections. Numerical&#xd; calculations are made for a one-dimensional system. Some prospects towards the extension of the suggested&#xd; approach to study binary bosonic mixtures are briefly discussed.
I am grateful to the anonymous Referees for useful&#xd; comments and criticisms, which open a possibility to develop&#xd; the method of the present paper on a more rigorous level.&#xd; The paper is based on the research provided by the&#xd; grant support of the State Fund For Fundamental Research&#xd; of Ukraine, Project F-64/41-2015 (No. 0115U004838).
en
Фізико-технічний інститут низьких температур ім. Б.І. Вєркіна НАН України
Физика низких температур
Бозе-эйнштейновская конденсация
Effective Hamiltonian and excitation spectrum of harmonically trapped bosons
Article
published earlier
spellingShingle Effective Hamiltonian and excitation spectrum of harmonically trapped bosons
Rovenchak, A.
Бозе-эйнштейновская конденсация
title Effective Hamiltonian and excitation spectrum of harmonically trapped bosons
title_full Effective Hamiltonian and excitation spectrum of harmonically trapped bosons
title_fullStr Effective Hamiltonian and excitation spectrum of harmonically trapped bosons
title_full_unstemmed Effective Hamiltonian and excitation spectrum of harmonically trapped bosons
title_short Effective Hamiltonian and excitation spectrum of harmonically trapped bosons
title_sort effective hamiltonian and excitation spectrum of harmonically trapped bosons
topic Бозе-эйнштейновская конденсация
topic_facet Бозе-эйнштейновская конденсация
url https://nasplib.isofts.kiev.ua/handle/123456789/128448
work_keys_str_mv AT rovenchaka effectivehamiltonianandexcitationspectrumofharmonicallytrappedbosons