Survivin expression in ovarian cancer

Aim: To examine the expression of survivin in benign ovarian tumors, ovarian carcinomas of different stages. Methods: We screened the expression of survivin mRNA by reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction in 114 ovarian tissue samples. Quantitative real-time PCR was used to estimate survivin...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Datum:2007
Hauptverfasser: Liguang, Z., Peishu, L., Hongluan, M., Hong, J., Rong, W., Wachtel, M.S., Frezza, E.E.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:English
Veröffentlicht: Інститут експериментальної патології, онкології і радіобіології ім. Р.Є. Кавецького НАН України 2007
Schriftenreihe:Experimental Oncology
Schlagworte:
Online Zugang:https://nasplib.isofts.kiev.ua/handle/123456789/138578
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Назва журналу:Digital Library of Periodicals of National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine
Zitieren:Survivin expression in ovarian cancer / Z. Liguang, L. Peishu, M. Hongluan, J. Hong, W. Rong, M.S. Wachtel, E.E. Frezza // Experimental Oncology. — 2007. — Т. 29, № 2. — С. 121–125. — Бібліогр.: 26 назв. — англ.

Institution

Digital Library of Periodicals of National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine
id nasplib_isofts_kiev_ua-123456789-138578
record_format dspace
spelling nasplib_isofts_kiev_ua-123456789-1385782025-02-09T15:29:13Z Survivin expression in ovarian cancer Экспрессия сурвивина в ткани при раке яичника Liguang, Z. Peishu, L. Hongluan, M. Hong, J. Rong, W. Wachtel, M.S. Frezza, E.E. Original contributions Aim: To examine the expression of survivin in benign ovarian tumors, ovarian carcinomas of different stages. Methods: We screened the expression of survivin mRNA by reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction in 114 ovarian tissue samples. Quantitative real-time PCR was used to estimate survivin mRNA levels in the samples with positive survivin expression. Results: No survivin mRNA was expressed in all normal ovarian specimens, while it appeared in 73% of ovarian carcinomas, 47% of borderline ovarian carcinomas and 19% of benign ovarian tumors. The survivin mRNA expression rate was positively associated with clinical stage (P = 0.026) and differentiation grade (P = 0.049). There was notably statistically significant difference in the survivin mRNA expression rate dependent on different histological types (serous, mucinous, endometrioid, P = 0.008), but not – dependent on lymph node metastasis (P = 0.921) and ascites (P = 0.87). In tissues with positive expression of survivin, we also found that mean survivin mRNA expression levels were higher in ovarian carcinomas than that in benign ovarian tumors and borderline ovarian carcinoma tissues (P < 0.001). Among ovarian carcinomas, the high survivin mRNA expression levels correlated with the clinical stages, differentiation grade, lymph node metastasis, but not — with ascites and histological type. Conclusion: Our study suggest that survivin is associated with progression of ovarian carcinoma. Цель: исследовать экспрессию сурвивина в доброкачественных и злокачественных новообразованиях яичника. Методы: экспрессия мРНК сурвивина исследована методом RT-PCR в 114 образах ткани яичника человека. Для установления уровня экспресии мРНК сурвивина применяли количественный PCR в режиме реального времени. Результаты: экспрессия мРНК сурвивина не выявлена в образцах нормальной ткани яичника, но зарегистрирована в 73% случаев рака яичника, 47% случаев серозных опухолей яичника серозного типа и 19% образцов доброкачественных опухолей. Установлена положительная зависимость между уровнем экспрессии мРНК сурвивина и клинической стадией заболевания (P = 0,026), и степенью дифференцировки опухоли (P = 0,049). Выявлена статистически значимая зависимость уровня экспрессии мРНК сурвивина от гистологического типа опухоли (серозного, мукозного, эндометриоидного, P = 0,008) и отсутствие таковой от наличия метастазов в лимфатических узлах (P = 0.921) или асцита (P = 0.87). Также установлено, что средние уровни экспрессии мРНК сурвивина выше при раке яичника, чем в ткани доброкачественных новобразований или серозных опухолей яичника пограничного типа (P < 0,001). При раке яичника высокий уровень экспрессии мРНК сурвивина коррелировал с клинической стадией заболевания, степенью дифференцировки опухолевых клеток, но не коррелировал с гистологическим типом новообразования. Выводы: результаты свидетельствуют о том, что экспрессия сурвивина ассоциирована с прогрессией рака яичника. Ключевые слова: сурвивин, рак яичника, опухолевая прогрессия. We thank several colleagues for collecting clinical materials and Feng Jingbo for the technical assistance. We also thank for Dr. Guo Yongjun and Dr. Chen Bo for their help in preparing the manuscript. 2007 Article Survivin expression in ovarian cancer / Z. Liguang, L. Peishu, M. Hongluan, J. Hong, W. Rong, M.S. Wachtel, E.E. Frezza // Experimental Oncology. — 2007. — Т. 29, № 2. — С. 121–125. — Бібліогр.: 26 назв. — англ. 1812-9269 https://nasplib.isofts.kiev.ua/handle/123456789/138578 en Experimental Oncology application/pdf Інститут експериментальної патології, онкології і радіобіології ім. Р.Є. Кавецького НАН України
institution Digital Library of Periodicals of National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine
collection DSpace DC
language English
topic Original contributions
Original contributions
spellingShingle Original contributions
Original contributions
Liguang, Z.
Peishu, L.
Hongluan, M.
Hong, J.
Rong, W.
Wachtel, M.S.
Frezza, E.E.
Survivin expression in ovarian cancer
Experimental Oncology
description Aim: To examine the expression of survivin in benign ovarian tumors, ovarian carcinomas of different stages. Methods: We screened the expression of survivin mRNA by reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction in 114 ovarian tissue samples. Quantitative real-time PCR was used to estimate survivin mRNA levels in the samples with positive survivin expression. Results: No survivin mRNA was expressed in all normal ovarian specimens, while it appeared in 73% of ovarian carcinomas, 47% of borderline ovarian carcinomas and 19% of benign ovarian tumors. The survivin mRNA expression rate was positively associated with clinical stage (P = 0.026) and differentiation grade (P = 0.049). There was notably statistically significant difference in the survivin mRNA expression rate dependent on different histological types (serous, mucinous, endometrioid, P = 0.008), but not – dependent on lymph node metastasis (P = 0.921) and ascites (P = 0.87). In tissues with positive expression of survivin, we also found that mean survivin mRNA expression levels were higher in ovarian carcinomas than that in benign ovarian tumors and borderline ovarian carcinoma tissues (P < 0.001). Among ovarian carcinomas, the high survivin mRNA expression levels correlated with the clinical stages, differentiation grade, lymph node metastasis, but not — with ascites and histological type. Conclusion: Our study suggest that survivin is associated with progression of ovarian carcinoma.
format Article
author Liguang, Z.
Peishu, L.
Hongluan, M.
Hong, J.
Rong, W.
Wachtel, M.S.
Frezza, E.E.
author_facet Liguang, Z.
Peishu, L.
Hongluan, M.
Hong, J.
Rong, W.
Wachtel, M.S.
Frezza, E.E.
author_sort Liguang, Z.
title Survivin expression in ovarian cancer
title_short Survivin expression in ovarian cancer
title_full Survivin expression in ovarian cancer
title_fullStr Survivin expression in ovarian cancer
title_full_unstemmed Survivin expression in ovarian cancer
title_sort survivin expression in ovarian cancer
publisher Інститут експериментальної патології, онкології і радіобіології ім. Р.Є. Кавецького НАН України
publishDate 2007
topic_facet Original contributions
url https://nasplib.isofts.kiev.ua/handle/123456789/138578
citation_txt Survivin expression in ovarian cancer / Z. Liguang, L. Peishu, M. Hongluan, J. Hong, W. Rong, M.S. Wachtel, E.E. Frezza // Experimental Oncology. — 2007. — Т. 29, № 2. — С. 121–125. — Бібліогр.: 26 назв. — англ.
series Experimental Oncology
work_keys_str_mv AT liguangz survivinexpressioninovariancancer
AT peishul survivinexpressioninovariancancer
AT hongluanm survivinexpressioninovariancancer
AT hongj survivinexpressioninovariancancer
AT rongw survivinexpressioninovariancancer
AT wachtelms survivinexpressioninovariancancer
AT frezzaee survivinexpressioninovariancancer
AT liguangz ékspressiâsurvivinavtkaniprirakeâičnika
AT peishul ékspressiâsurvivinavtkaniprirakeâičnika
AT hongluanm ékspressiâsurvivinavtkaniprirakeâičnika
AT hongj ékspressiâsurvivinavtkaniprirakeâičnika
AT rongw ékspressiâsurvivinavtkaniprirakeâičnika
AT wachtelms ékspressiâsurvivinavtkaniprirakeâičnika
AT frezzaee ékspressiâsurvivinavtkaniprirakeâičnika
first_indexed 2025-11-27T10:30:19Z
last_indexed 2025-11-27T10:30:19Z
_version_ 1849939129649856512
fulltext Experimental Oncology ���� ��������� ����� ���ne�� ������� ��������� ����� ���ne�� �����ne�� ����� ��� ��� Ovarian cancer occ�pies the place among the leading ca�ses of death from gynecological cancer. Altho�gh the �-year s�rvival rate for all stages has improved recently�� it is still disappointingly low �3�%���� largely beca�se that there is no efficient methods for diagnosis and therapy [�]. So it is important to search for a biomarker identifying high risk patients. S�rvivin is a member of the inhibitor of apoptosis protein �IAP�� family and has been implicated in both apoptosis inhibition and cell cycle control [��� 3]. It is aberrantly expressed in vario�s kinds of cancer cells b�t is �ndetectable in normal differentiated ad�lt tis- s�es�� except testis�� thym�s�� and placenta [4]. More- over�� many st�dies have reported that the expression rate of s�rvivin in t�mor tiss�es is associated with t�mor progression and �nfavorable clinicopathologic variables�� s�ch as poor prognosis�� shorter patient s�rvival rates and chemoresistance [����]. S�rvivin is expressed in h�man carcinomas�� b�t its expression levels in tiss�es are different�� that is associ- ated with the poor o�tcome of patients [�3��4]. Many st�dies have demonstrated that rate of expression and s�bcell�lar localization of s�rvivin correlated with the progression and prognosis of ovarian carcinoma [����8]. In this st�dy�� we �sed QRT-PCR to analyze s�rvivin expression levels in benign ovarian t�mors�� ovarian carcinomas of different stages in order to identify these correlations. It was shown that the high s�rvivin mRNA expression is implicated in ovarian carcinoma progression and may serve as a prognostic marker for ovarian carcinoma patients. Materials and Methods Patients and tissue handling. Fresh ovarian tis- s�es were obtained with Instit�tional Review Board approved informed consent from patients treated by the Department of Gynecologic & Obstetrics at Qil� hospital of Shandong University between De- cember ���� and ��ly ���6�� and incl�de 63 cases of ovarian carcinoma�� �� cases of borderline ovarian carcinoma�� �� cases of benign ovarian t�mor�� and �� samples of normal ovarian tiss�e from patients who �nderwent total abdominal hysterectomy with salpingo-oopherectomy for non-malignant gyneco- logic disease. The patients ranged in age from �� to ��� years ���.3 ± ��.6 years; median age�� �6 years��. The staging and grading of t�mors were determined in accordance with the International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics �FIGO�� criteria ���8��� for malignant ovarian carcinoma; �8 t�mors were classi- fied as early stage �I/II�� and 3� — as advanced stage �III/IV��; 3� cases were at low grade �G��G����� and 33 — at high grade�G3��. Histological types incl�ded sero�s �n = 4����� m�cino�s �n = ������ and endometrioid �n = ���. There were 34 cases with lymph node metas- tasis and 36 cases with ascites. All tiss�e specimens were immediately frozen in liq�id nitrogen and then stored in �8� °C �ntil �se. RNA extraction and reverse transcription. Total RNA was extracted from frozen tiss�es by the Trizol reagent �Invitrogen�� USA���� according to the s�pplier’s survivin expression in ovarian cancer Z. Liguang1, L. Peishu1, *, M. Hongluan1, J. Hong2, W. Rong2, M.S. Wachtel3, E.E. Frezza4 1Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Qilu Hospital of Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong 250012, PR China 2The Key Laboratory of Cardiovascular Remodeling and Function Research, Qilu Hospital of Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong 250012, PR China 3Department of Pathology, Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center, Lubbock Texas, USA 4Department of General Surgery, Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center, Lubbock Texas, USA Aim: To examine the expression of survivin in benign ovarian tumors, ovarian carcinomas of different stages. Methods: We screened the expression of survivin mRNA by reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction in 114 ovarian tissue samples. Quantitative real-time PCR was used to estimate survivin mRNA levels in the samples with positive survivin expression. Results: No survivin mRNA was expressed in all normal ovarian specimens, while it appeared in 73% of ovarian carcinomas, 47% of borderline ovarian carcinomas and 19% of benign ovarian tumors. The survivin mRNA expression rate was positively associated with clinical stage (P = 0.026) and differentiation grade (P = 0.049). There was notably statistically significant difference in the survivin mRNA expression rate dependent on different histological types (serous, mucinous, endometrioid, P = 0.008), but not – dependent on lymph node metastasis (P = 0.921) and ascites (P = 0.87). In tissues with positive expression of survivin, we also found that mean survivin mRNA expression levels were higher in ovarian carcinomas than that in benign ovarian tumors and borderline ovarian carcinoma tissues (P < 0.001). Among ovarian carcinomas, the high survivin mRNA expression levels correlated with the clinical stages, differentiation grade, lymph node metastasis, but not — with ascites and histological type. Conclusion: Our study suggest that survivin is associated with progression of ovarian carcinoma. Key Words: survivin, ovarian carcinoma, progression. Received: April 12, 2007. *Correspondence: Fax: (0086) 0531-86920598 E-mail: liguang1229@hotmail.com Abbreviations used: IAP — inhibitor of apoptosis protein; MDS — myelodysplastic syndrome; QRT-PCR — quantitative real-time PCR; RT-PCR — reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction. Exp Oncol ����� ���� ��� ������� ��� Experimental Oncology ���� ��������� ����� ���ne�� protocol. Total RNA �3 μg�� samples were reverse transcribed to a final vol�me of �� μl�� �sing �� pM oligo-�dT��-primer �TaKaRa�� �apan���� � mM dNTP mix �TaKaRa�� �apan���� ��� U reverse transcriptase �Pro- mega�� USA���� and � × b�ffer 4 μl. RT reactions were performed on Mastercycler �Eppendorf�� Germany��. RNA was treated for 3� min at 3�� °C by DNase before reverse transcription. RT-PCR analysis survivin mRNA expression in ovarian tissues. We screened the positive expression of s�rvivin mRNA by RT-PCR in ��4 ovarian samples. The cDNA was amplified in a �� μl reaction vol�me containing � U Taq polymerase �Promega�� USA���� ��� μM dNTP�� �.� mM MgCl��� � μl �� × polymerase chain reaction b�ffer�� and �� mM KCL. Specific pri- mers for s�rvivin and β-actin were generated �sing the Primer 3 software and prepared by Invitrogen Biotech. The seq�ences of the primers are shown in Table �. All PCRs were performed by Mastercycler �Eppendorf�� Germany��. The cycling conditions com- prised a denat�ration step for � min at �� °C�� followed by 4� cycles of denat�ration ��� °C for 3� s���� anneal- ing ��3 °C for 3� s�� and extension ���� °C for 3� s��. The PCR prod�cts were electrophoresed on a �% agarose gel�� stained with ethidi�m bromide ��.� μg/ml���� and vis�alized by an UV transill�minator �Alpha Innotech�� USA��.We �sed h�man β-actin as an internal marker. It was considered positive if PCR prod�ct was ��� bp by gel electrophoresis. Table 1. Primers used for PCR Survivin Antisense CTTTCTCAACGACCACCG 110 bp NM001168.2sense GTAGGTGACGGGGTGAC β-Actin Antisense GTTGCGTTACACCCTTTC 152 bp NM001101.2sense CTGTCACCTTCACCGTTC QRT-PCR analysis survivin mRNA expression levels in ovarian tisssues. QRT-PCR was �sed to determine relative s�rvivin mRNA expression levels in �� cases with s�rvivin �+�� ovarian tiss�es. QRT-PCR analysis was performed on Light Cycler �Roche Ap- plied Science�� USA�� and on a vol�me of �� μl contain- ing � μl of cDNA�� �� μl of �� × SYBR Green PCR Master Mix �TaKaRa�� �apan���� �.� μl of each primer ��� pM���� and 8 μl of DEPC-treated water. Primers for s�rvivin and β-actin were same as those �sed for RT-PCR. The program for detection s�rvivin was set at �� °C for �� s�� q�antification program ��� °C for � s�� �6 °C for � s�� and ��� °C for � s�� 83 °C for � s�� which was repeated �� times�� a melting c�rve program ��� °C for � s and 6�°C for 3� s�� ��°C with a heating rate of �.� °C for � s and contin�o�s fl�orescence meas�rement���� and a cooling step to 4� °C for 3� s. The program for detected β-actin was set at �� °C for �� s�� q�antification ��� °C for � s�� �3 °C for � s�� and ��� °C for �� s�� which was repeated �� times�� a melting c�rve program ��� °C for � s and 6� °C for 3� s�� �� °C with a heating rate of �.� °C for � s and contin�o�s fl�orescence meas�rement���� and a cooling step to 4� °C for 3� s. A standard c�rve of cycle thresholds �sing serial dil�tions of cDNA samples were �sed to calc�late the relative ab�ndance. Melting c�rve analysis was performed to confirm prod�ction of a single prod�ct in each reaction. The specificity of the amplification prod�cts was verified f�rther by s�bject- ing the amplification prod�cts to electrophoresis on a �% agarose gel. S�rvivin mRNA expression was nor- malized to the expressed ho�sekeeping gene β-actin. The data was analyzed with Light Cycle software 4.� �Roche Applied Science�� USA��. Statistical analysis. All statistical analyses were performed with the SPSS ��.� � software package for Windows �SPSS Inc�� Chicago�� IL��. The correlation between s�rvivin expression and clinicopathologic feat�res was statistically analyzed with the Chi-sq�are test and Fisher’s exact test. St�dent’s two-tailed t-test was �sed to compare data between two gro�ps. One- way analysis of variance and Bonferroni’s correction were �sed to compare data between three or more gro�ps. P-val�e < �.�� was considered statistically significant. results RT-PCR analysis survivin mRNA expression in ovarian tissues. RT-PCR analysis showed that there were �� cases with positive s�rvivin mRNA expres- sion from ��4 ovarian tiss�e samples�� incl�ding zero in normal ovarian tiss�es�� 46 ���3%�� in the 63 cases of ovarian carcinomas�� 8 �4��%�� in the �� cases of borderline ovarian carcinomas�� 4 ���%�� in �� cases of benign ovarian t�mors �Table ��� Fig. ��� Fig. ��� a��. The data on relationship between the vario�s clinicopatho- logic feat�res and s�rvivin mRNA expression rate are described in Table �. A significant positive correlation �P = �.��6�� was observed between s�rvivin mRNA expression rate and histological grade �Fig. ��� b��. Of the 3� low-grade �G��G��� t�mors�� �8 �6�%�� showed s�rvivin mRNA expression. In contrast�� �� �84%�� of 33 high-grade t�mors �G3�� were positive for s�rvivin mRNA expression. F�rthermore�� a significant cor- relation �P = �.�4��� became evident between s�rvivin expression and clinical stage of the disease �Fig. ��� c��. ��� �6�%�� cases with positive s�rvivin expression were related to stage I/II�� and �� �8�%�� cases to stage III/IV. The s�rvivin expression rate in ovarian carcinomas was associated with histological type �P = �.��8�� Fig. ��� d ���� b�t no correlation was fo�nd between s�rvivin expres- sion and lymph node metastasis �P = �.����� Fig. ��� e�� or ascites �P = �.8���� Fig. ��� f�� . Fig. 1. S�rvivin mRNA expression in ovarian tiss�es analyzed by RT-PCR. NOV: normal ovarian carcinoma�� BOVT: benign ova- rian t�mor�� BOVC: borderline ovarian carcinoma�� OVC: ovarian carcinoma. Actin — ��� bp�� s�rvivin — ��� bp Experimental Oncology ���� ��������� ����� ���ne�� ��3���� ��������� ����� ���ne�� ��3��ne�� ��3�� ��3 ��3 Fig. 2. The rate of s�rvivin expression in ovarian tiss�e samples dependent on type of t�mor �a�� NOV: normal ovarian carcinoma�� BOVT: benign ovarian t�mor�� BOVC: borderline ovarian carcinoma�� OVC: ovarian carcinoma��; differentiation grade �b��; clinical stage �c��; histological type �d��; lymph node metastasis �e�� and ascites �f�� Table 2. Expression of survivin mRNA in ovarian tissue samples Sample Number of patients Positive survivin expression (%) P-value Normal ovarian tissue 11 0 (0%) Benign ovarian tumor 21 4 (19%) Borderline ovarian carcinoma 19 9 (47%) Ovarian carcinoma 63 46 (73%) Grade: 0.026 G1–G2 30 18 (60%) G3 33 28 (84%) FIGO stage: 0.049I–II 28 17 (60%) III–IV 35 29 (82%) Histological type: 0.008serous 42 35 (76%) mucinous 12 8 (66%) endometrioid 9 3 (33.3%) Lymph node metastasis: 0.921 Yes 34 25 (73%) No 29 21 (72%) Ascites: 0.87 yes 36 26 (72%) No 27 20 (74%) QRT-PCR analysis survivin mRNA expression levels. QRT-PCR was �sed to determine relative expres- sion levels of the s�rvivin gene in �� cases with s�rvivin �+�� ovarian tiss�es. The res�lts demonstrated that higher levels of s�rvivin/β-actin mRNA expression in ovarian car- cinoma ��.���� ± �.��486�� than that in borderline ovarian carcinoma tiss�es ��.���� ± �.���88�� and benign ovarian t�mor tiss�es ��.����� ± �.�������. There was statistical difference among them �P < �.���� Fig. 3�� a��. The res�lts also demonstrated that there was significant difference of mean s�rvivin/ β-actin mRNA expression levels between G��G� and G3 in ovarian carcinoma ��.���4 ± �.��348 vers�s �.��4� ± �.���33�� P = �.�4��� Fig. 3�� b��. In advanced stage �III/IV�� cancers�� the mean s�rvivin/β-actin mRNA expression levels were higher than that in early-stage �I/II�� cancers ��.���4 ± �.��3�6 vers�s �.��4� ± �.���3���� P = �.�4��� Fig. 3�� c��. F�rthermore�� we fo�nd that the mean s�rvivin mRNA levels were higher in cases with lymph node metastasis than that witho�t lymph node metastasis ��.���3 ± �.��3�� vers�s �.��44 ± �.���46�� P = �.�3��� Fig. 3�� d��. No statistical difference �P > �.���� Fig. 3�� e�� was identified in s�rvivin expression among sero�s can- cers�� endometrioid and m�cino�s�� no statistic difference �P > �.���� Fig. 3�� f�� to ascites either �Table 3��. Fig. 3. S�rvivin/actin mRNA expression levels in ovarian tiss�es meas�red by real time PCR depenedent on on type of t�mor �a�� NOV: normal ovarian carcinoma�� BOVT: benign ovarian t�mor�� BOVC: borderline ovarian carcinoma�� OVC: ovarian carcinoma��; differentiation grade �b��; clinical stage �c��; histological type �d��; lymph node metastasis �e�� and ascites �f�� ��4 Experimental Oncology ���� ��������� ����� ���ne�� Table 3. Survivin/β-actin mRNA expression levels Sample Survivin/β-actin mRNA ex- pression levels (means ± SD) P-value Benign ovarian tumor 0.0007 ± 0.00011 Borderline ovarian carcinoma 0.0055 ± 0.00188 < 0.001 Ovarian carcinoma 0.0122 ± 0.00486 Grade: G1–G2 0.0104 ± 0.00348 0.041 G3 0.0142 ± 0.00533 FIGO stage: I–II 0.0104 ± 0.00316 0.041 III–IV 0.0141 ± 0.00537 Histological type: serous 0.0133 ± 0.00525 0.673 (s vs m) mucinous 0.0123 ± 0.00478 0.600 (s vs e) endometrioid 0.0177 ± 0.00562 0.856 (m vs e) Lymphonode metastasis: Yes 0.0103 ± 0.00302 0.031 No 0.0144 ± 0.00546 Ascites: yes 0.0137 ± 0.00518 no 0.0125 ± 0.00526 0.563 discussion Ovarian carcinoma is among the most common female cancers and the leading ca�se of death from gynecologic malignancy in the world. Altho�gh the clinical and histological prognostic factors �e. g. t�mor grade and clinical stage�� had been reported to be of prognostic significance in ovarian cancer [��]�� it is conceivable that the assessment of biochemical factors more strictly related to t�mor cell biology and intrinsic aggressiveness co�ld help identifying high-risk patients and facilitating management of this disease. Cell proliferation and cell death pathways meet at a pivotal crossroad�� cr�cial to maintain normal homeo- stasis and to eliminate dangero�s cells before they start dividing. S�rvivin is an intrig�ing and fascinating protein at this crossroad that interfaces life and death�� thro�gh its d�al role in facilitating cell division and enco�ntering apoptosis [��]. S�rvivin promotes cell proliferation and enhances angiogenesis�� it may play an important role in protecting abnormal cells from apoptosis d�ring cell division�� which contrib�tes to t�mor development and prognosis [����3]. Several st�dies had shown that s�rvivin mRNA ex- pression levels correlated with the prognosis in s�ch carcinomas as osteosarcoma and myelodysplastic syndrome [�3��4]. Only the expression rate of s�rvivin has been reported to be associated with progress and prognosis of ovarian carcinoma in some literat�res [����8]�� b�t little is known abo�t the relationship bet- ween the expression levels of s�rvivin and prognosis of ovarian carcinoma. In o�r experiment we testified that the rate of s�rvivin expression is associated with progression of ovarian carcinoma and some other parameters �FIGO stage�� differentiation grade�� and histological type��. Moreover�� we fo�nd that s�rvivin expression levels were different in s�rvivin positive tiss�es. S�rvivin ex- pression levels were the highest in ovarian carcinomas�� and there were the lowest s�rvivin expression levels in benign ovarian t�mor tiss�es. F�rthermore�� s�rvivin expression levels are associated with the FIGO stage�� grade�� and lymph node metastasis�� b�t not with ascites and histological type in ovarian carcinoma. In this st�dy we determined not only whether s�r- vivin gene was expressed or not�� b�t also the levels of s�rvivin expression in ovarian carcinoma. One can �se real time PCR to detect the mRNA expression of ova- rian tiss�es by biopsy. F�rthermore�� s�rvivin is �nder st�dy as a novel target for the treatment of cancer�� and its expression may be reg�lated by different ap- proaches [�4��6]. The relationships between s�rvivin expression levels and the s�rvival rate or the reaction to chemo- therapy of patients with ovarian carcinoma were not showed in the present st�dy�� beca�se of the lack of the follow-�p. F�rther long-term follow-�p st�dies wo�ld be done in f�t�re to address these q�estions. acknowledgeMent We thank several colleag�es for collecting clinical materials and Feng �ingbo for the technical assistance. We also thank for Dr. G�o Yongj�n and Dr. Chen Bo for their help in preparing the man�script. reFerences 1. Bjorge T, Engeland A, Sundfor K, Trope CG. Prognosis of 2800 patients with epithelial ovarian cancer diagnosed dur- ing 1975–94 and treated at the Norwegian Radium Hospital. Anta Obstet Gynecol Scand 1998; 77: 777–81. 2. Ambrosini G, Adida C, Sirugo G, Altieri DC. Induction of apoptosis and inhibition of cell proliferation by survivin gene targeting. J Biol Chem 1998; 273: 11177–82. 3. Li F, Ambrosini G, Chu EY, Plescia J, Tognin S, Marchi- sio PC, Altieri DC. Control of apoptosis and mitotic spindle checkpoint by survivin. Nature 1998; 396: 580–4. 4. Ambmsini G, Adids C, Alticri DC. A novel antiapoptosis gene survivin expressed in cancer and lymphoma. Nat Med 1997; 3: 917–21. 5. Weinman EC, Roche PC, Kasperbauer JL, Cha SS, Sar- gent DJ, Cheville J et al. Characterization of antigen processing machinery and survivin expression in tonsillar squamous cell carcinoma. Cancer 2003; 97: 2203–11. 6. Shariat SF, Lotan Y, Saboorian H, Khoddami SM, Roehr- born CG, Slawin KM et al. Survivin expression is associated with features of biologically aggressive prostate carcinoma. Cancer 2004; 100: 751–7. 7. Saxena A, Yashar C, Taylor DD, Gercel-Taylor C. Cellu- lar response to chemotherapy and radiation in cervical cancer. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2005; 192: 1399–403. 8. Muzio LL, Pannone G, Staibano S, Mignogna MD, Rubini C, Mariggio MA. Survivin expression in oral squamous cell carcinoma. Br J Cancer 2003; 89: 2244–8. 9. Rodel F, Hoffmann J, Distel L, Herrmann M, Nois- ternig T, Papadopoulos T. Survivin as a radioresistance factor and prognostic and therapeutic target for radiotherapy in rectal cancer. Cancer Res 2005; 65: 4881–7. 10. Kami K, Doi R, Koizumi M, Toyoda E, Mori T, Ito D, Fujimoto K, Wada M, Miyatake S, Imamura M. Survivin ex- pression is a prognostic marker in pancreatic cancer patients. Surgery 2004; 136: 443–8. 11. Lee JP, Chang KH, Han JH, Ryu HS. Survivin, a novel anti-apoptosis inhibitor, expression in uterine cervical cancer and relationship with prognostic factors. Int J Gynecol Cancer 2005; 15: 113–9. 12. Mizutani K, Matsumoto K, Hasegawa N, Deguchi T, Nozawa Y. Expression of clusterin, XIAP and survivin, and their changes by camptothecin (CPT) treatment in CPT- Experimental Oncology ���� ��������� ����� ���ne�� ������� ��������� ����� ���ne�� �����ne�� ����� ��� ��� resistant PC-3 and CPT-sensitive LNCaP cells. Exp Oncol 2006; 28: 209–15. 13. Gianelli U, Fracchiolla NS, Cortelezzi A. Survivin expression in “low-risk” and “high-risk” myelodysplastic syndromes. Ann Hematol 2007; 86: 185–9. 14. Osaka E, Suzuki T, Osaka S. Survivin as a prognostic factor for osteosarcoma patients. Acta Histochem Cytochem 2006; 39: 95–100. 15. Fernandina G, Legge F, Martinelli E, Ranelletti FO, Zannoni GF. Survivin expression in ovarian cancer and its correlation with clinicopathological, surgical and apoptosis- related parameters. Br J Cancer 2005; 92: 271–7. 16. Tringler B, Lehner R, Shroyer AL, Shroyer KR. Im- munohistochemical localization of survivin in serous tumors of the ovary. Appl Immunohistochem Mol Morphol 2004; 12: 40–3. 17. Kleinberg L, Florenes VA, Silins I, Haug K. Nuclear expression of survivin is associated with improved survival in metastatic ovarian carcinoma. Cancer 2007; 109: 228–38. 18. Cohen C, Lohmann CM, Cotsonis G, Lawson D, Santoianni R. Survivin expression in ovarian carcino- ma: correlation with apoptotic markers and prognosis. Mod Pathol 2003; 16: 574–83. 19. Hoskins WJ, Perez CA, Young RC. Principles and practice of gynecology. Oncology 2000; 33: 1005–7. 20. Koochekpour S, Zerfaoui M,Yousief Z,Ouhtit A, Ma- trougui K, Bengrine A. Survivin is not only a death encounter but also a survival protein for invading tumor cells. Front Biosci 2007; 12: 1260–70. 21. Duffy MJ, O’donovan N, Brennan DJ, Gallagher WM, Ryan BM. Survivin: a promising tumor biomarker. Cancer Lett 2007; Epub ahead of print. 22. Lee GH, Joo YE, Koh YS, Chung IJ, Park YK, Lee JH, Kim HS, Choi SK, Rew JS, Park CS, Kim SJ. Expression of survivin in gastric cancer and its relationship with tumor an- giogenesis. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2006; 18: 957–63. 23. Zhen HN, Zhang X, Hu PZ, Yang TT, Fei Z, Zhang JN, Fu LA, He XS, Ma FC, Wang XL. Survivin expression and its relation with proliferation, apoptosis, and angiogenesis in brain gliomas. Cancer 2005; 104: 2775–83. 24. Faqing T, Zhi H, Liqun Y, Min T, Huanhua G, Xiyun D, Ya C. Epstein-Barr virus LMP1 initiates cell proliferation and apoptosis inhibition via regulating expression of survivin in nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Exp Oncol 2005; 27: 96–101. 25. Coma S, Noe V, Lavarino C, Adan J, Rivas M, Lopez- Matas M, Pagan R, Mitjans F, Vilaro S, Piulats J, Ciudad CJ. Use of siRNAs and antisense oligonucleotides against survivin RNA to inhibit steps leading to tumor angiogenesis. Oligo- nucleotides 2004; 14: 100–13. 26. Li F, Ling X, Huang H, Brattain L, Apontes P, Wu J, Binderup L, Brattain MG. Differential regulation of survivin expression and apoptosis by vitamin D3 compounds in two isogenic MCF-7 breast cancer cell sublines.Oncogene 2005; 24: 1385–95. Экспрессия сурвивина в ткани при раке яичника Цель: исследовать экспрессию сурвивина в доброкачественных и злокачественных новообразованиях яичника. Методы: экспрес- сия мРНК сурвивина исследована методом RT-PCR в 114 образ�ах ткани яичника человека.�ля установления уровня экспресииRT-PCR в 114 образ�ах ткани яичника человека.�ля установления уровня экспресии-PCR в 114 образ�ах ткани яичника человека.�ля установления уровня экспресииPCR в 114 образ�ах ткани яичника человека.�ля установления уровня экспресиив 114 образ�ах ткани яичника человека. �ля установления уровня экспресии мРНК сурвивина применяли количественный PCR в режиме реального времени. Результаты: экспрессия мРНК сурвивина не выявлена в образ�ах нормальной ткани яичника, но зарегистрирована в 73% случаев рака яичника, 47% случаев серозных опухолей яичника серозного типа и 19% образ�ов доброкачественных опухолей. Установлена положительная зависимость между уровнем экспрессии мРНК сурвивина и клинической стадией заболевания (P = 0,026), и степенью дифферен�ировки опухоли (P = 0,049). Выявлена статистически значимая зависимость уровня экспрессии мРНК сурвивина от гистологического типа опухоли (серозного, мукозного, эндометриоидного, P = 0,008) и отсутствие таковой от наличия метастазов в лимфатических узлах (P = 0.921) или ас�ита (P = 0.87). Также установлено, что средние уровни экспрессии мРНК сурвивина выше при раке яичника, чем в ткани доброкачественных новобразований или серозных опухолей яичника пограничного типа (P < 0,001). При раке яичника высокий уровень экспрессии мРНК сурвивина коррелировал с клинической стадией заболевания, степенью дифферен�ировки опухолевых клеток, но не коррелировал с гистологическим типом новообразования. Выводы: результаты свидетельствуют о том, что экспрессия сурвивина ассо�иирована с прогрессией рака яичника. Ключевые слова: сурвивин, рак яичника, опухолевая прогрессия. Copyright © Experimental Oncology, 2007