Synthesis and Magnetic Characteristics of N–Co Nanocomposites

The single-domain nanoparticles of NiCo, NiCo on the surface of graphene (NiCo@GNP) and NiCo on the surface of silica dioxide (NiCo@SiO₂) are synthesized. Their crystalline structure, surface morphology and magnetic characteristics of nanoparticle are investigated. It is shown that the magnetization...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Металлофизика и новейшие технологии
Date:2018
Main Authors: Lisova, O.M., Abramov, M.V., Makhno, S.M., Gorbyk, P.P.
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Інститут металофізики ім. Г.В. Курдюмова НАН України 2018
Subjects:
Online Access:https://nasplib.isofts.kiev.ua/handle/123456789/146077
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Journal Title:Digital Library of Periodicals of National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine
Cite this:Synthesis and Magnetic Characteristics of N–Co Nanocomposites / O.M. Lisova, M.V. Abramov, S.M. Makhno, P.P. Gorbyk // Металлофизика и новейшие технологии. — 2018. — Т. 40, № 5. — С. 625-635. — Бібліогр.: 33 назв. — англ.

Institution

Digital Library of Periodicals of National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine
_version_ 1860242209880670208
author Lisova, O.M.
Abramov, M.V.
Makhno, S.M.
Gorbyk, P.P.
author_facet Lisova, O.M.
Abramov, M.V.
Makhno, S.M.
Gorbyk, P.P.
citation_txt Synthesis and Magnetic Characteristics of N–Co Nanocomposites / O.M. Lisova, M.V. Abramov, S.M. Makhno, P.P. Gorbyk // Металлофизика и новейшие технологии. — 2018. — Т. 40, № 5. — С. 625-635. — Бібліогр.: 33 назв. — англ.
collection DSpace DC
container_title Металлофизика и новейшие технологии
description The single-domain nanoparticles of NiCo, NiCo on the surface of graphene (NiCo@GNP) and NiCo on the surface of silica dioxide (NiCo@SiO₂) are synthesized. Their crystalline structure, surface morphology and magnetic characteristics of nanoparticle are investigated. It is shown that the magnetization curve of the nanoparticles ensembles in the form, which is distinctive for superparamagnets, and its calculations within the framework of the Langevin’s paramagnetism theory are satisfactorily consistent with the experimental results. The laws of particle size distribution in ensembles are established using the method of magnetic granulometry. Синтезированы однодоменные наночастицы NiCo, NiCo на поверхности графена (NiCo@GNP) и NiCo на поверхности диоксида кремния (NiCo@SiO₂). Исследованы кристаллическая структура, морфология поверхности и магнитные свойства нанокомпозитов. Показано, что кривая намагниченности ансамблей наночастиц имеет форму, характерную для суперпарамагнетиков; её расчёты в рамках теории парамагнетизма удовлетворительно согласуются с экспериментальными результатами. Методом магнитной гранулометрии установлены законы распределения частиц по размерам в ансамблях. Синтезовано однодоменні наночастинки NiCo, NiCo на графеновій поверхні (NiCo@ГНП) та NiCo на поверхні діоксиду силіцію (NiCo@SiO₂). Досліджено їхні кристалічну структуру, морфологію поверхні та магнетні характеристики ансамблів наночастинок. Показано, що крива магнетованости ансамблів наночастинок має форму, характерну для суперпарамагнетиків, а її розрахунки в рамках Ланжевенової теорії парамагнетизму задовільно узгоджуються з експериментальними результатами. Методою магнетної ґранулометрії встановлено закони розподілу частинок за розмірами в ансамблях.
first_indexed 2025-12-07T18:31:03Z
format Article
fulltext 625 PACS numbers: 61.05.cp, 62.23.Pq, 68.37.Lp, 68.65.Pq, 75.60.Ej, 75.75.Cd, 81.05.ue Synthesis and Magnetic Characteristics of N–Co Nanocomposites O. M. Lisova, M. V. Abramov, S. M. Makhno, and P. P. Gorbyk O. O. Chuiko Institute of Surface Chemistry, N.A.S. of Ukraine, 17 General Naumov Str., UA-03164 Kyiv, Ukraine The single-domain nanoparticles of NiCo, NiCo on the surface of graphene (NiCo@GNP) and NiCo on the surface of silica dioxide (NiCo@SiO2) are syn- thesized. Their crystalline structure, surface morphology and magnetic characteristics of nanoparticle are investigated. It is shown that the magnet- ization curve of the nanoparticles ensembles in the form, which is distinctive for superparamagnets, and its calculations within the framework of the Langevin’s paramagnetism theory are satisfactorily consistent with the ex- perimental results. The laws of particle size distribution in ensembles are es- tablished using the method of magnetic granulometry. Key words: nanocomposites, nanoparticles, graphene, magnetic properties, superparamagnets. Синтезовано однодоменні наночастинки NiCo, NiCo на графеновій поверхні (NiCo@ГНП) та NiCo на поверхні діоксиду силіцію (NiCo@SiO2). Дослідже- но їхні кристалічну структуру, морфологію поверхні та магнетні характе- ристики ансамблів наночастинок. Показано, що крива магнетованости ансамблів наночастинок має форму, характерну для суперпарамагнети- ків, а її розрахунки в рамках Ланжевенової теорії парамагнетизму задо- вільно узгоджуються з експериментальними результатами. Методою ма- гнетної ґранулометрії встановлено закони розподілу частинок за розмі- рами в ансамблях. Ключові слова: нанокомпозити, наночастинки, графен, магнетні власти- вості, суперпарамагнетики. Corresponding author: Oksana Miroslavivna Lisova E-mail: oksana.garkusha@gmail.com Citation: O. M. Lisova, M. V. Abramov, S. M. Makhno, and P. P. Gorbyk, Synthesis and Magnetic Characteristics of N–Co Nanocomposites, Metallofiz. Noveishie Tekhnol., 40, No. 5: 625–635 (2018), DOI: 10.15407/mfint.40.05.0625. Ìåòàëëîôèç. íîâåéøèå òåõíîë. / Metallofiz. Noveishie Tekhnol. 2018, т. 40, № 5, сс. 625–635 / DOI: 10.15407/mfint.40.05.0625 Îòòèñêè äîñòóïíû íåïîñðåäñòâåííî îò èçäàòåëÿ Ôîòîêîïèðîâàíèå ðàçðåøåíî òîëüêî â ñîîòâåòñòâèè ñ ëèöåíçèåé 2018 ÈÌÔ (Èíñòèòóò ìåòàëëîôèçèêè èì. Ã. Â. Êóðäþìîâà ÍÀÍ Óêðàèíû) Íàïå÷àòàíî â Óêðàèíå. https://doi.org/10.15407/mfint.40.05.0625 https://doi.org/10.15407/mfint.40.05.0625 626 O. M. LISOVA, M. V. ABRAMOV, S. M. MAKHNO, and P. P. GORBYK Синтезированы однодоменные наночастицы NiCo, NiCo на поверхности графена (NiCo@GNP) и NiCo на поверхности диоксида кремния (NiCo@SiO2). Исследованы кристаллическая структура, морфология по- верхности и магнитные свойства нанокомпозитов. Показано, что кривая намагниченности ансамблей наночастиц имеет форму, характерную для суперпарамагнетиков; её расчёты в рамках теории парамагнетизма удо- влетворительно согласуются с экспериментальными результатами. Мето- дом магнитной гранулометрии установлены законы распределения ча- стиц по размерам в ансамблях. Ключевые слова: нанокомпозиты, наночастицы, графен, магнитные свойства, суперпарамагнетики. (Received March 1, 2018) 1. INTRODUCTION Bimetallic nanocomposites (BNCs) containing nanoparticles (NP) of organic and inorganic materials have been attracting considerable at- tention of specialists in recent years [1, 2] due to a large number of possible applications [3, 4]. Prominent areas for the using of such structures are catalysis and electrocatalysis [5, 6]; in electronics, BNCs are used as electrode materials for solar and fuel cells [7, 8], elec- tric and biosensors [9, 10], as corrosion-resistant materials and much more. The importance of searching for new methods of obtaining and researching BNCs is due to their multifunctionality, the possibility of a unique combination of the properties of many materials in one [4]. They acquire better catalytic, thermal, optical, electrical, and magnet- ic properties as compared to monometallic and bimetallic particles without a matrix. Consequently, the presence of a matrix not only plays the role of a substrate, but also is a functionally active element [11]. Composites are obtained on various inorganic (kaolin, zeolites and zirconium) and organic (artificial and natural polymers, graphite derivatives) matrices [1, 6, 12]. In recent years, various methods for obtaining bimetallic BNCs have been developed, the synthesis of which is carried out by spraying methods [13, 14], glow discharge [15], pulsed laser ablation [16], re- versed micelles [17], thermal decomposition [18], chemical recovery from a solution [19, 20]. Most often, bimetallic LFs are obtained by simultaneous restoration of two metal ions in conditions of stabiliza- tion of the chemical composition, size, and shape of particles. BNCs have different forms; they exist in the form of alloys or contact ag- glomerates, such as kernel–shell, etc. Particular attention is paid to the magnetic properties of BNCs con- taining ferromagnetic NPs on carbon-containing matrices, which are investigated for creating water-purifying filters [21, 22], rechargeable SYNTHESIS AND MAGNETIC CHARACTERISTICS OF N–Co NANOCOMPOSITES 627 batteries, various sensors [4], protective materials from corrosion and deterioration [11] and electromagnetic waves [23] and others. The purpose of the work is to study the structural and magnetic properties of ferromagnetic nanoparticles NiCo, NiCo@GNP and Ni- Co@SiO2 nanocomposites. 2. MATERIALS AND METHODS Graphene nanoplates (GNP) are obtained by electrochemical deposition in an electrolyte (KOH) of a low concentration at a current passing to 60 mA/cm2. Electrodes were placed between polypropylene fabric filters for the separation of large graphite particles from nanosized ones. GNPs are stored in the form of a suspension with a mass concentration of gra- phene 2% and pH 12. The NiCo particles were obtained by the method of chemical precipitation from a solution of hydrazine hydrate of nickel and cobalt carbonates [24] at a temperature of 350 K. The technique was modified for the purpose of synthesis of NiCo@GNP composites, co- precipitation of a solution of carbonates and a suspension of graphene was prepared at a boiling point of hydrazine hydride at a mass ratio of 9:1 components. The presence of KOH in a suspension of graphene cre- ated favourable conditions for the synthesis of metal particles. GNPs play the role of crystallization centres as well as contribute to the stabi- lization of the size and chemical composition of nanoparticles. For the synthesis of NiCo@SiO2 composites, a SiO2 suspension had been previously prepared by mixing tetraethoxysilane with ethyl alco- hol and ammonium hydroxide in a ratio of 1:20:10. The slurry was added to a Ni and Co carbonates solution in hydrazine hydrate. X-ray diffraction analysis was performed by powder diffractometry on a DRON-4-07 diffractometer while the emission of an anode line CuK with a nickel filter in the reflected beam at the geometry of the Breguet–Bretagne shooting. The morphology of the specimens was studied using a JEOL JEM-1230 transmitted electronic microscope. The hinges of the magnetic moment of the specimens were measured using a laboratory vibration magnetometer at a room temperature. The description of the installation and the method of measurement are de- scribed in [25]. Specially prepared, demagnetized specimens were measured. For comparison, a test sample of nickel was used. The meas- urement error of the specific saturation magnetization ( s) relative to the tested sample did not exceed 2.5%. 3. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION The electron-microscopy studies revealed the presence of nanometer- size particles in all three understudied systems. It is shown that, on the 628 O. M. LISOVA, M. V. ABRAMOV, S. M. MAKHNO, and P. P. GORBYK surface of the GNP, there are metal particles in the size range 20– 200 nm (Fig. 1, b); in more detailed images of graphene film, metal particles of 20 nm can be observed. Large particles are probable to be agglomerates consisting of small ones [24]. The results of the x-ray diffraction (Fig. 2) analysis indicated the presence of phases of GNP, nickel, cobalt and the absence of reflexes of the incoming carbonates. Thus, peaks of 22.4 and 31.3 can be related to the presence of graphene structures in samples, and a low-intensity band of 27.1 corresponds to a crystalline lattice of graphite. Particles of nickel may correspond to peaks of 44.9 —octahedral (111), 52.2 and 91.8 —cubic syngony. The cobalt crystalline lattice of a cubic syngony corresponds to peaks of 52.2 (111), 61.2 (200), 91.8 (220), hexagonal—55.9 (101). Conse- quently, the peaks of 52.2 and 91.8 may indicate the presence of bime- Fig. 1. PEM images of the NiCo (a), NiCo@GPN (b), NiCo@SiO2 (c) NP. Fig. 2. The diffraction pattern of the NiCo (1), NiCo@GNP (2) and NiCo@SiO2 (3) samples. SYNTHESIS AND MAGNETIC CHARACTERISTICS OF N–Co NANOCOMPOSITES 629 tallic particles of NiCo with a cubic crystal lattice (200) [13]. The size of crystallites, calculated by Scherrer’s equation, is 15–20 nm. The parameters of the basal cell NiCo and NiCo@GNP and Ni- Co@SiO2 bands obtained by statistical processing of the PEM images of the corresponding samples are given in Table 1. The size distribution of superparamagnetic particles can be deter- mined by measuring the magnetization curve M(H), pronounced by the Langevin function [26], we assume that all particles have a spherical shape without interaction. The normal distribution is determined by the Gauss equation: 2 2 ( ) 21 ( , , ) , 2 d d d M d d d p d M e (1) where Md and d are expected value and standard deviation of the NP diameter, respectively. The lognormal distribution of particles in diameters is determined by the equation: 2 ln 2 ln (ln ) 2 ln ln ln 1 (ln , , ) , 2 d d d M d d d p d M e d (2) where Mlnd and lnd are expected value and standard deviation of the logarithm of the NP diameter, respectively. With the use of an experimental distribution in size, one can predict the density of a normal or lognormal distribution. With a particle amount more than 50, the probability density with the accuracy of the experiment corresponds to the general population, which means a suf- ficient statistical sampling. Figures 3–5, a show the experimental dis- tribution of the diameters of the three NiCo, NiCo@GNP and Ni- Co@SiO2 systems. NiCo@SiO2 and NiCo@GNP systems have a more even distribution, albeit they are significantly different from the val- TABLE 1. Statistical parameters of low-frequency NiCo and NiCo@GNP, Ni- Co@SiO2 structures. Pattern N <D>, nm D, nm <lnD> lnD NiCo 62 9.96991 3.71358 2.24052 0.34173 NiCo@ГНП 63 23.33829 8.84181 3.08827 0.34629 NiCo@SiO2 64 8.67567 3.36113 2.08959 0.38353 N—the amount of particles, <D>—the average of the NP diameter, D—the standard deviation of the NP diameter, <lnD>—the average of the logarithm of the NP diame- ter, lnD—standard deviation of the logarithm of the NP diameter. 630 O. M. LISOVA, M. V. ABRAMOV, S. M. MAKHNO, and P. P. GORBYK ues of the largest and smallest bore diameters. Curves obtained in Fig. 3–5, b show that the NiCo particles are dis- tributed by diameters closer to the normal distribution, the maximum values of NiCo@GNP are closer to the lognormal, and NiCo@SiO2 in accordance with the normal. An analysis of form of the distribution of nanoparticles can serve as a means for testing hypotheses regarding the nature of their growth in the process of chemical condensation [30]. In most cases, formation of a low frequency is followed by two processes: sequential and/or parallel growth. In the case of the random nature of the interactions between the NP, with the parallel growth (without interaction between the crystals), it is likely that the distri- bution of the NP in size is normal (Gaussian), while in the sequential manner, it is lognormal [31]. Fig. 3. a—the NP distribution by the diameters for the NiCo system; b—the polygon of the relative frequencies of the NP diameters, and the probability density calculated by the lognormal distribution 1 by Eq. (1) of the NP ensem- ble of NiCo particles and by the normal distribution 2 by Eq. (2). Fig. 4. a—the distribution by diameters, b—the polygon of relative frequen- cies of diameters and density of probability calculated by Eq. (1) for the NP ensemble of NiCo @ GNP (N 63): 1—lognormal, 2—normal distribution of the NiCo bulk and NiCo nanoparticles in the NiCo@GNP nanocomposite. SYNTHESIS AND MAGNETIC CHARACTERISTICS OF N–Co NANOCOMPOSITES 631 For the system of magnetosensitive SiO2/Fe3O4 nanocomposites, it was shown [25, 32] that artificial nucleation can produce magnetic ma- terial with an average crystallite size of 5–8 nm and a value of a specif- ic surface area that is 2–3 times higher than the corresponding value for magnetite obtained by the Elmor’s method. Stabilization of magnetic NP on primary particles can increase the stability of nanocomposite system particles. NiCo fixed on the surface of SiO2 and GNP or incorporated into the space between these particles have spatial barriers to aggregation among themselves, but remain ac- cessible to other reagents of the existing system. It is important that they can not only store their basic physical and chemical characteris- tics, but also acquire new ones. By the method of magnetic granulometry [27], which is based on the comparison of the experimental and Langevin magnetization curves with given laws of particle-size distribution and their magnetic pa- rameters, in particular, the magnetization of saturation of the particle material and the thickness of degaussed layer, according to the exper- imental magnetization curve of the NSC, they were found to be in the size distribution of the NP. For the analysis of magnetization curves, the known equation [28, 29] 1 bulk 3 3 3 1 1 ( ) ( 2 ) ( 2 ) , 6 NCP k k s i i i i iNCP i i Bs M HH n D n D L D k T (3) where NCP(H), NCP s —the NP specific magnetization in the applied field of intensity H and the specific magnetization of the NP satura- tion, respectively, bulk sM —the magnetization of the saturation of the massive nickel crystal; Di, ni—the mean diameter and the number of NP in the i-th range of the variational row of diameters; k—number of Fig. 5. a—the distribution by diameters, b—the polygon of relative frequen- cies of diameters and density of probability calculated by Eq. (1) of the Ni- Co@SiO2 NP ensemble (N 64). 1—lognormal, 2—normal distribution of the NiCo bulk and NiCo@SiO2 nanocomposite. 632 O. M. LISOVA, M. V. ABRAMOV, S. M. MAKHNO, and P. P. GORBYK intervals; —the thickness of the surface NP with nonlinear magnetic moments; L( ) cth 1/ —Langevin function; kB—Boltzmann con- stant; T—absolute temperature. In Figure 6, it is evident that the magnetization of NiCo@GNP and NiCo@SiO2 samples is similar in the application of magnetic field of 10 kOe. The magnetization of a NiCo sample is much higher in the mag- netization of composite specimens, which, assuming the same low- frequency size for the NiCo@SiO2 system, indicates the content of the nonmagnetic component of the NP in the composite. Saturation magnetization depends on the size of particles. The ratio of saturation magnetization (Table 2) for the NiCo and NiCo@SiO2 samples (exactly these samples can be compared, since they have ap- proximately the same particle sizes), s(NiCo@SiO2)/ s(NiCo), is about 24% (by mass) of magnetic nanoparticles in the NiCo@SiO2 composite. For larger NiCo@GNP particles, a comparison with literature data [33] shows that the mass fraction of magnetic particles is about 20%. The residual magnetization of the NiCo@SiO2 sample (Fig. 6, b) is twice as low as the NiCo nanoparticles output, and is twice as low as the coercive force, so the NiCo@SiO2 particles are more easily magnetized than the NiCo NP. The above-mentioned characteristics describe the ensemble of particles, not each separately. Fig. 6. Loops of hysteresis (a) of the NiCo (1), NiCo@GNP (2), NiCo@SiO2 (3) samples; the central part of the hysteresis (b). TABLE 2. Magnetic characteristics of the NiCo and BNC nanoparticles on their basis. Pattern Hc, Oe (10 kOe), Gs сm3/g s, Gs сm3/g NiCo 178 ( 1%) 71.1 ( 2.5%) 73.2 ( 2.5%) NiCo@ГНП 164 ( 1%) 13.8 ( 2.5%) 14.2 ( 2.5%) NiCo@SiO2 91 ( 1%) 16.8 ( 2.5%) 17.3 ( 2.5%) SYNTHESIS AND MAGNETIC CHARACTERISTICS OF N–Co NANOCOMPOSITES 633 In one-domain state, the prevailing mechanism of reversal is a pro- cess of coherent rotation of magnetic moments, which is hindered by crystallographic anisotropy and anisotropy of form of a particle. The maximum coercive force of reversal of the ensemble of chaotically ori- ented noninteracting particles with uniaxial anisotropy can be repre- sented as two terms (neglecting the anisotropy of mechanical stresses): 0.64 0.479( ) , c K c N c s a R s H H H K I N N I (4) where KHc, NHc are maximum value of the reciprocal field caused by the presence of crystallographic anisotropy and the component caused by the anisotropy of form [32], respectively; K is the anisotropy constant. In approximation of a spherical particle, Na NR, the second term of Eq. (4), turns to zero. An analysis of the hysteresis loops of composites taking into account Eq. (4) indicates the possibility of determining the value of the constant of the crystallographic anisotropy of the NiCo NP, which characterizes an ability of the material to remagnetization. Is s, (5) where is the density of the material, s is the specific magnetization of saturation, from where K H s, K 1.8 105 erg/cm3. The con- stants of anisotropy for Ni and Co are equal to 0.5 105 erg/cm3 and 45 105 erg/cm3 [33], respectively. Therefore, the calculated value is within the specified limits. 4. CONCLUSIONS The NiCo, NiCo on the surface of graphene (NiCo@GNP) and NiCo on Fig. 7. 1—the hysteresis loop of the NiCo@GNP sample obtained experimental- ly, 2—the theoretical curve obtained by Eq. (4) for the low NiCo@GNP (N 63) with parameters MlnV 8.61774 and lnV 1.03888. 634 O. M. LISOVA, M. V. ABRAMOV, S. M. MAKHNO, and P. P. GORBYK the surface of silica dioxide (NiCo@SiO2) nanoparticles were obtained by chemical precipitation from a solution of hydrazine hydride. The conducted PEM and x-ray studies showed the presence of phases of na- nometer-size composites. The crystallographic anisotropy constant for the NiCo nanoparticles and the mass content of magnetic nanoparticles in the NiCo@SiO2 and NiCo@GNP composites are equal to 24 and 20%, respectively. The method of magnetic granulometry has established that the NiCo and NiCo@SiO2 particles have a normal size distribution, and Ni- Co@GNP is lognormal, which indicates a different mechanism of growth. For NiCo and NiCo@SiO2, a parallel crystal growth is typical, and for NiCo@GNP, successively due to the influence of surface of a matrix. Study of the distribution of size of synthesized particles shows that the nature of growth of crystals can be controlled changeably. REFERENCES 1. G. Sharma, M. Naushad, A. Kumar, S. Devi, and M. R. Khan, Iran. Polym. J., 24: 1003 (2015). 2. G. Sharma, D. Kumar, A. Kumar, A. H. Al-Muhtaseb, D. Pathania, M. Naushad, and G. T. Mola, Mater. Sci. Eng. C, 71: 1216 (2017). 3. G. Sharma, A. Kumar, Sh. Sharma, Mu. Naushad, R. P. Dwivedi, Z. A. ALOthman, and G. T. Mola, Journal of King Saud University – Science (2017). 4. S. M. Hamidi, B. Mosaeii, M. Afsharnia, A. Aftabi, and M. Najafi, J. Magn. Magn. Mater., 417: 130 (2016). 5. Y. Han, W. Li, M. Zhang, and K. Tao, Chemosphere, 72: 53 (2008). 6. B. Habibi and S. Ghaderi, Int. J. Hydrogen Energy, 40, Iss. 15: 5115 (2015). 7. M. Motlak, N. A. Barakat, M. S. Akhtar, A. M. Hamza, B. Kim, C. Sang, K. Abdelrazek, and A. A. Almajid, Electrochim. Acta, 160: 138 (2015). 8. V. Dao, Y. Choi, K. Yong, L. L. Larina, O. Shevaleevskiy, and H. Choi, J. Power Sources, 274: 831 (2015). 9. M. Cui, J. Huang, Y. Wang, Y. Wu, and X. Luo, Biosens. Bioelectron., 68: 563 (2015). 10. C. Kung, P. Lin, F. John, Y. Xue, and X. Yu, Biosens. Bioelectron., 52: 1 (2014). 11. S. Awasthi, S. K. Pandey, A. Juyal, C. P. Pandey, and K. Balani, J. Alloys Compd., 711: 15 (2017). 12. R. Ahmad, A. S. Qureshi, L. Li, J. Bao, X. Jia, Y. Xu, and X. Guo, Colloids Surf. B: Biointerfaces, 143: 490 (2016). 13. S. Akamaru, M. Inoue, Y. Honda, A. Taguchi, and T. Abe, Jpn. J. Appl. Phys., 51, No. 6R: 065201 (2012). 14. M. Maicas, M. Sanz, H. Cui, C. Aroca, and P. Sánchez, J. Magn. Magn. Mater., 322: 3485 (2010). 15. G. Saito, S. Hosokai, T. Akiyama, S. Yoshida, S. Yatsu, and S. Watanabe, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn., 79: 083710 (2010). 16. P. Kalita, J. Singh, M. K. Singh, P. R. Solanki, G. Sumana, and B. D. Malhotra, Appl. Phys. Lett., 100: 093702 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13726-015-0388-2 https://doi.org/10.1007/s13726-015-0388-2 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msec.2016.11.002 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jksus.2017.06.012 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jksus.2017.06.012 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmmm.2016.05.078 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmmm.2016.05.078 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2008.02.002 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2015.02.103 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electacta.2015.02.063 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpowsour.2014.10.095 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpowsour.2014.10.095 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bios.2015.01.029 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bios.2015.01.029 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bios.2013.08.025 http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0925838817311799 http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0925838817311799 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jallcom.2017.04.003 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.colsurfb.2016.03.065 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.colsurfb.2016.03.065 https://doi.org/10.1143/JJAP.51.065201 https://doi.org/10.1143/JJAP.51.065201 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmmm.2010.06.050 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmmm.2010.06.050 https://doi.org/10.1143/JPSJ.79.083710 https://doi.org/10.1063/1.3690044 SYNTHESIS AND MAGNETIC CHARACTERISTICS OF N–Co NANOCOMPOSITES 635 17. P. Calandra, Mater. Lett., 63: 2416 (2009). 18. I. Gonzalez, J. C. De Jesus, E. Cañizales, B. Delgado, and C. Urbina, J. Phys. Chem. C, 116: 21577 (2012). 19. T. Bala, R. D. Gunning, M. Venkatesan, J. F. Godsell, S. Roy, and K. M. Ryan, Nanotechnology, 20: 415603 (2009). 20. Y. Yamauchi, T. Itagaki, T. Yokoshima, and K. Kuroda, Dalton Trans., 41: 1210 (2012). 21. X. Wu, Z. Zhang, C. Xia, B. Chen, and X. Min, J. Alloys Compd., 718: 15 (2017). 22. E. Motamedi, M. Talebi Atouei, and M. Z. Kassaee, Materials Research Bulletin, 54: 34 (2014). 23. X. Lv, J. Guo, C. Zhao, Y. Wei, J. Zhang, Z. Wu, and C. Gong, Mater. Lett., 201: 43 (2017). 24. P. V. Lapsina, Nanostrukturirovanye Poroshki Ni, Co i Sistemy Ni–Co, Poluchenhye Vosstanovleniem Kristallicheskikh Karbonatov Vodnym Rastvorom Gidrazin Gidrata [Nanostructured Powder of Ni, Co and Ni–Co System Obtained by Recovery of Crystalline Carbonates by Water Hydrazine Hydrate Solution] (Thesis of Disser. for Dr. Chem. Sci.) (Kemerovo: 2013) (in Russian). 25. M. V. Borysenko, V. M. Bogatyrov, I. V. Dubrovin, M. V. Abramov, M. V. Gayevaya, and P. P. Gorbik, Fiziko-Khimiya Nanomaterialov i Supramolekulyarnykh Struktur [Physicochemistry of Nanomaterials and Supramolecular Structures] (Kiev:2007) (in Russian). 26. C. P. Bean and J. D. Livingston, J. Appl. Phys., 30: 120S (1959). 27. A. Yu. Olenin, Rossiyskie Nanotekhnologii, 7, Nos. 5–6: 53 (2012) (in Russian). 28. M. M. Labushev, Matematicheskie Metody i Modeli pri Reshenii Geologicheskikh Zadach na EhVM [The Mathematical Methods and Models for Solving Geological Problems on a Computer] (Krasnoyarsk: 2007) (in Russian) 29. V. M. Bogatyrov, M. V. Borysenko, I. V. Dubrovin, M. V. Abramov, M. V. Galaburda, and P. P. Gorbyk, Nanomaterials and Supramolecular Structures : Physics, Chemistry, and Applications (Eds. A. P. Shpak and P. P. Gorbyk) (Dordrecht,Netherlands: Springer: 2009), p. 159. 30. C. P. Bean and I. S. Jacobs, J. Appl. Phys., 27: 1448 (1956). 31. R. Kaiser and G. Miscolczy, J. Appl. Phys., 41, No. 3: 1064 (1970). 32. E. E. Bibik, B. Ya. Matyrgulin, Yu. L. Raykher, and M. I. Shliomis, Magnitnaya Gidrodinamika, 68, No. 1: 68 (1973) (in Russian). 33. B. D. Cullity and C. D. Graham, Introduction to Magnetic Materials (Wiley-IEEE Press: 2009). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matlet.2009.08.016 https://doi.org/10.1021%2Fjp302372r https://doi.org/10.1021%2Fjp302372r https://doi.org/10.1088/0957-4484/20/41/415603 https://doi.org/10.1039/C1DT11395J https://doi.org/10.1039/C1DT11395J http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0925838817316122 http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0925838817316122 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.materresbull.2014.02.019 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.materresbull.2014.02.019 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matlet.2017.04.144 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matlet.2017.04.144 https://doi.org/10.1063/1.2185850 https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-2309-4_12 https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-2309-4_12 https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-2309-4_12 https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1722287 https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1658812
id nasplib_isofts_kiev_ua-123456789-146077
institution Digital Library of Periodicals of National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine
issn 1024-1809
language English
last_indexed 2025-12-07T18:31:03Z
publishDate 2018
publisher Інститут металофізики ім. Г.В. Курдюмова НАН України
record_format dspace
spelling Lisova, O.M.
Abramov, M.V.
Makhno, S.M.
Gorbyk, P.P.
2019-02-06T19:15:37Z
2019-02-06T19:15:37Z
2018
Synthesis and Magnetic Characteristics of N–Co Nanocomposites / O.M. Lisova, M.V. Abramov, S.M. Makhno, P.P. Gorbyk // Металлофизика и новейшие технологии. — 2018. — Т. 40, № 5. — С. 625-635. — Бібліогр.: 33 назв. — англ.
1024-1809
PACS: 61.05.cp, 62.23.Pq, 68.37.Lp, 68.65.Pq, 75.60.Ej, 75.75.Cd, 81.05.ue
DOI: https://doi.org/10.15407/mfint.40.05.0625
https://nasplib.isofts.kiev.ua/handle/123456789/146077
The single-domain nanoparticles of NiCo, NiCo on the surface of graphene (NiCo@GNP) and NiCo on the surface of silica dioxide (NiCo@SiO₂) are synthesized. Their crystalline structure, surface morphology and magnetic characteristics of nanoparticle are investigated. It is shown that the magnetization curve of the nanoparticles ensembles in the form, which is distinctive for superparamagnets, and its calculations within the framework of the Langevin’s paramagnetism theory are satisfactorily consistent with the experimental results. The laws of particle size distribution in ensembles are established using the method of magnetic granulometry.
Синтезированы однодоменные наночастицы NiCo, NiCo на поверхности графена (NiCo@GNP) и NiCo на поверхности диоксида кремния (NiCo@SiO₂). Исследованы кристаллическая структура, морфология поверхности и магнитные свойства нанокомпозитов. Показано, что кривая намагниченности ансамблей наночастиц имеет форму, характерную для суперпарамагнетиков; её расчёты в рамках теории парамагнетизма удовлетворительно согласуются с экспериментальными результатами. Методом магнитной гранулометрии установлены законы распределения частиц по размерам в ансамблях.
Синтезовано однодоменні наночастинки NiCo, NiCo на графеновій поверхні (NiCo@ГНП) та NiCo на поверхні діоксиду силіцію (NiCo@SiO₂). Досліджено їхні кристалічну структуру, морфологію поверхні та магнетні характеристики ансамблів наночастинок. Показано, що крива магнетованости ансамблів наночастинок має форму, характерну для суперпарамагнетиків, а її розрахунки в рамках Ланжевенової теорії парамагнетизму задовільно узгоджуються з експериментальними результатами. Методою магнетної ґранулометрії встановлено закони розподілу частинок за розмірами в ансамблях.
en
Інститут металофізики ім. Г.В. Курдюмова НАН України
Металлофизика и новейшие технологии
Строение и свойства наноразмерных и мезоскопических материалов
Synthesis and Magnetic Characteristics of N–Co Nanocomposites
Синтез и магнитные характеристики нанокомпозитов N–Co
Синтеза та магнетні характеристики нанокомпозитів N–Co
Article
published earlier
spellingShingle Synthesis and Magnetic Characteristics of N–Co Nanocomposites
Lisova, O.M.
Abramov, M.V.
Makhno, S.M.
Gorbyk, P.P.
Строение и свойства наноразмерных и мезоскопических материалов
title Synthesis and Magnetic Characteristics of N–Co Nanocomposites
title_alt Синтез и магнитные характеристики нанокомпозитов N–Co
Синтеза та магнетні характеристики нанокомпозитів N–Co
title_full Synthesis and Magnetic Characteristics of N–Co Nanocomposites
title_fullStr Synthesis and Magnetic Characteristics of N–Co Nanocomposites
title_full_unstemmed Synthesis and Magnetic Characteristics of N–Co Nanocomposites
title_short Synthesis and Magnetic Characteristics of N–Co Nanocomposites
title_sort synthesis and magnetic characteristics of n–co nanocomposites
topic Строение и свойства наноразмерных и мезоскопических материалов
topic_facet Строение и свойства наноразмерных и мезоскопических материалов
url https://nasplib.isofts.kiev.ua/handle/123456789/146077
work_keys_str_mv AT lisovaom synthesisandmagneticcharacteristicsofnconanocomposites
AT abramovmv synthesisandmagneticcharacteristicsofnconanocomposites
AT makhnosm synthesisandmagneticcharacteristicsofnconanocomposites
AT gorbykpp synthesisandmagneticcharacteristicsofnconanocomposites
AT lisovaom sintezimagnitnyeharakteristikinanokompozitovnco
AT abramovmv sintezimagnitnyeharakteristikinanokompozitovnco
AT makhnosm sintezimagnitnyeharakteristikinanokompozitovnco
AT gorbykpp sintezimagnitnyeharakteristikinanokompozitovnco
AT lisovaom sintezatamagnetníharakteristikinanokompozitívnco
AT abramovmv sintezatamagnetníharakteristikinanokompozitívnco
AT makhnosm sintezatamagnetníharakteristikinanokompozitívnco
AT gorbykpp sintezatamagnetníharakteristikinanokompozitívnco