Note on Dilogarithm Identities from Nilpotent Double Affine Hecke Algebras

Recently Cherednik and Feigin [arXiv:1209.1978] obtained several Rogers-Ramanujan type identities via the nilpotent double affine Hecke algebras (Nil-DAHA). These identities further led to a series of dilogarithm identities, some of which are known, while some are left conjectural. We confirm and ex...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Symmetry, Integrability and Geometry: Methods and Applications
Datum:2012
1. Verfasser: Nakanishi, T.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:Englisch
Veröffentlicht: Інститут математики НАН України 2012
Online Zugang:https://nasplib.isofts.kiev.ua/handle/123456789/149184
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Назва журналу:Digital Library of Periodicals of National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine
Zitieren:Note on Dilogarithm Identities from Nilpotent Double Affine Hecke Algebras / T. Nakanishi // Symmetry, Integrability and Geometry: Methods and Applications. — 2012. — Т. 8. — Бібліогр.: 9 назв. — англ.

Institution

Digital Library of Periodicals of National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine
_version_ 1860134333792124928
author Nakanishi, T.
author_facet Nakanishi, T.
citation_txt Note on Dilogarithm Identities from Nilpotent Double Affine Hecke Algebras / T. Nakanishi // Symmetry, Integrability and Geometry: Methods and Applications. — 2012. — Т. 8. — Бібліогр.: 9 назв. — англ.
collection DSpace DC
container_title Symmetry, Integrability and Geometry: Methods and Applications
description Recently Cherednik and Feigin [arXiv:1209.1978] obtained several Rogers-Ramanujan type identities via the nilpotent double affine Hecke algebras (Nil-DAHA). These identities further led to a series of dilogarithm identities, some of which are known, while some are left conjectural. We confirm and explain all of them by showing the connection with Y-systems associated with (untwisted and twisted) quantum affine Kac-Moody algebras.
first_indexed 2025-12-07T17:46:39Z
format Article
fulltext Symmetry, Integrability and Geometry: Methods and Applications SIGMA 8 (2012), 104, 5 pages Note on Dilogarithm Identities from Nilpotent Double Affine Hecke Algebras Tomoki NAKANISHI Graduate School of Mathematics, Nagoya University, Chikusa-ku, Nagoya, 464-8604, Japan E-mail: nakanisi@math.nagoya-u.ac.jp Received November 15, 2012, in final form December 22, 2012; Published online December 25, 2012 http://dx.doi.org/10.3842/SIGMA.2012.104 Abstract. Recently Cherednik and Feigin [arXiv:1209.1978] obtained several Rogers–Ra- manujan type identities via the nilpotent double affine Hecke algebras (Nil-DAHA). These identities further led to a series of dilogarithm identities, some of which are known, while some are left conjectural. We confirm and explain all of them by showing the connection with Y -systems associated with (untwisted and twisted) quantum affine Kac–Moody algebras. Key words: double affine Hecke algebra; dilogarithm; Y -system 2010 Mathematics Subject Classification: 17B37; 13F60 1 Dilogarithm identities from Nil-DAHA Let Rn be a root system of finite type and of rank n with non-degenerate bilinear form ( , ), and let αi and ωi be the simple roots and the fundamental weights of Rn. The Cartan matrix C = (cij) n i,j=1 is given by cij = 2(αi, αj)/(αi, αi). Following [3], let A = (aij) and A[ = (a[ij) be the matrices with aij = 2(ωi, ωj) and a [ ij = (ωi, ωj), respectively. Set νi = (αi, αi)/2. Then, ν−1i (αi, ωj) = δij , and we have( A[ )−1 = ( cijν −1 j )n i,j=1 . (1) Below we normalize the bilinear form as (αshort, αshort) = 2 so that νi ∈ {1, 2, 3}. Let L(x) be the Rogers dilogarithm function L(x) = −1 2 ∫ x 0 { log(1− y) y + log y 1− y } dy. In [3, equation (3.34)] Cherednik and Feigin presented two (partially conjectural) series of di- logarithm identities. Let A′ = (a′ij) n i,j=1 be either A or A[ as above. Let Qi (i = 1, . . . , n) be the unique solution of the system of equations (1−Qi)νi = n∏ j=1 Q a′ij j (2) in the range 0 < Qi < 1. Then, the following identity was proposed 6 π2 n∑ i=1 νiL(Qi) = LA′ , (3) where the value LA′ is the rational number given in Table 1. In addition, there are identities for ‘type Tn’ (tadpole type). We define the ‘Cartan mat- rix’ C as almost the same as type An except that the last diagonal entry is 1, not 2. Also the mailto:nakanisi@math.nagoya-u.ac.jp http://dx.doi.org/10.3842/SIGMA.2012.104 2 T. Nakanishi Table 1. The value LA′ . Rn An Bn Cn Dn E6 E7 E8 F4 G2 Tn LA n(n+1) n+3 n(2n−1) n+1 n n− 1 36 7 63 10 15 2 36 7 3 n(2n+1) 2n+3 LA[ n(n+1) n+4 2n(2n−1) 2n+3 2n(n+1) 2n+3 2(n−1)n 2n+1 24 5 6 80 11 24 5 8 3 n(2n+1) 2n+4 matrices A and A[ are defined by aij = 2min(i, j) and a[ij = min(i, j), respectively; the latter is the same matrix A[ for type Cn. Then, (A[)−1 = C holds. We set νi = 1. Again, (3) should hold for the value LA′ in Table 1, where Tn is formally included as a member of Rn. In [3] these identities were partially obtained and generally motivated by the Rogers–Rama- nujan type identities arising from nilpotent affine Hecke algebras (Nil-DAHA), but only some of them are identified with the known identities. The authors of [3] expected the connection between (3) and dilogarithm identities from some Y -systems (and cluster algebras behind them). In this note we answer this question affirmatively, and, in particular, we confirm all the identities in question. The note has con- siderable overlap with the paper by Lee [8], but it is written for a different purpose and in a different perspective. 2 Dilogarithm identities for Y -systems of simply laced type Let us recall the following dilogarithm identities proved by cluster algebra method [9]. For ` = 2 see also [2]. Let C be any Cartan matrix of simply laced type Rn = An, Dn, E6, E7, E8, and let ` ≥ 2 be any integer (called the level). Let Y (i) m (i = 1, . . . , n; m = 1, . . . , ` − 1) be the unique real positive solution of the system of equations ( Y (i) m )2 = n∏ j=1 ( 1 + Y (j) m )2δij−cij ( 1 + Y (i) m−1 −1 )( 1 + Y (i) m+1 −1 ) , (4) where Y (i) 0 −1 = Y (i) ` −1 = 0. Theorem 1 ([9, Corollay 1.9]). The following identity holds 6 π2 n∑ i=1 `−1∑ m=1 L ( Y (i) m 1 + Y (i) m ) = (`− 1)nh h+ ` , (5) where h is the Coxeter number of type Rn, i.e., n + 1, 2n − 2, 12, 18, 30 for An, Dn, E6, E7, E8, respectively. The system of equations (4) is called the level ` constant Y -system associated with the quantum affine Kac–Moody algebra of (untwisted) type R (1) n , which is a specialization of the cor- responding (non-constant) Y -system. It is also known as the (constant) Y -system of Rn ×A`−1. See [6] for more information. We explain below that all the identities (3) in question are the ones in (5) for ` = 2, 3, or their specializations. Note on Dilogarithm Identities 3 Table 2. The Langlands dual of affine type. R (1) n A (1) n B (1) n C (1) n D (1) n E (1) 6 E (1) 7 E (1) 8 F (1) 4 G (1) 2 S (r) m A (1) n A (2) 2n−1 D (2) n+1 D (1) n E (1) 6 E (1) 7 E (1) 8 E (2) 6 D (3) 4 3 Identification with Y -systems from quantum affine Kac–Moody algebras 3.1 The non-[ case We consider the case A′ = A. We use the change of variables Qi = Yi 1 + Yi , (6) so that the range 0 < Qi < 1 corresponds to the range 0 < Yi. Then, using (1), one can transform the equations (2) into the form n∏ j=1 ( 1 1 + Yj )cij = ( Yi 1 + Yi )2 , which is equivalent to Y 2 i = n∏ j=1 (1 + Yj) 2δij−cij . (7) For simply laced typesAn,Dn, E6, E7, E8, (7) coincides with the level 2 constant Y -system (4) of untwisted type R (1) n by identifying Yi with Y (i) 1 . Then, the right hand side of (5) with ` = 2 gives the value of LA, agreeing with Table 1. In contrast, for types Bn, Cn, F4, G2, (7) coincides with the level 2 constant Y -system of twisted type S (r) m (in the sense of [6, Remark 9.22]), where S (r) m is the Langlands dual of R (1) n . See Table 2 for the Langlands dual of affine type. Also see [6, Section 9] for the full version of Y -systems of twisted type. In this case, the direct inspection of the Cartan matrix shows that the equation (7) can be obtained from the level 2 constant Y -system of the untwisted (and simply laced) type S (1) m by folding, i.e., identifying the variables with the diagram automor- phism σ of Sm. This is possible, due to the symmetry Y (i) m ↔ Y (σ(i)) m of the Y -system (4). Furthermore, it is easy to see that νi coincides with the number of elements in the σ-orbit of i. Thus, we obtain the identity (3) for type Rn with LA(Rn) = LA(Sm). For example, for Rn = Bn, LA(Bn) = LA(A2n−1). This confirms and explains Table 1. Finally, for type Tn, (7) coincides with the level 2 constant Y -system of type A (2) 2n (in the sense of [6, Remark 9.22]). Note that A (2) 2n is self-dual under the Langlands duality. Again, this Y -system is obtained by the folding of level 2 constant Y -system of untwisted A (1) 2n . Since we set νi = 1, the multiplicities are discarded in (3). Therefore, LA(Tn) = LA(A2n)/2. Actually, this connection is known in [3] and other literature. 3.2 The [ case We consider the case A′ = A[. By the same change of variables (6), one can transform the equations (2) into the form n∏ j=1 ( 1 1 + Yj )cij = ( Yi 1 + Yi ) = ( Yi 1 + Yi )2 ( 1 + Yi −1), 4 T. Nakanishi which is equivalent to Y 2 i = n∏ j=1 (1 + Yj) 2δij−cij 1 + Yi−1 . (8) For simply laced types, An, Dn, E6, E7, E8, (8) is obtained from the level 3 constant Y - system (4) of untwisted type R (1) n by the specialization Y (i) 1 = Y (i) 2 and identifying it with Yi. This is possible, due to the symmetry Y (i) 1 ↔ Y (i) 2 of level 3 Y -system (4). (One can also view it as the folding of A2 to T1 in the second component of Rn×A2.) Since we discard the multiplicity in (3), LA[ is the half of the right hand side of (5) with ` = 3. This agrees with Table 1. Similarly, for the rest of types, (8) is obtained from the level 3 constant Y -system of type S (r) m or A (2) 2n (in the sense of [6, Remark 9.22]) by the specialization Y (i) 1 = Y (i) 2 , and the latter is further obtained from the level 3 constant Y -system of type S (1) m or A (1) 2n by the folding. Then, one can confirm Table 1. Let us summarize the result. Theorem 2. The identity (3) holds. Moreover, except for type Tn, the value LA′ in (3) has a unified expression LA′ = mh∗ h∗ + ` , where ` = 2 for A′ = A and ` = 3 for A′ = A[, and m and h∗ are the rank and Coxeter number of Sm for the Langlands dual S (r) m of R (1) n . We remark that the dilogarithm identities for untwisted and nonsimply laced types B (1) n , C (1) n , F (1) 4 , G (1) 2 are also known [4, 5]. It is natural to ask whether they will also appear from Nil-DAHA. 4 Connection to cluster algebraic method For the reader’s convenience, we include a brief explanation of the background of the dilogarithm identity (5), especially in the cluster algebraic method. See [7] and references therein for more information. (a) Y -systems and dilogarithm identities. As the name suggests, the constant Y -system (4) is the constant version of the following (non-constant) Y -system Y (i) m (u+ 1)Y (i) m (u− 1) = n∏ j=1 ( 1 + Y (j) m (u) )2δij−cij ( 1 + Y (i) m−1(u) −1 )( 1 + Y (i) m+1(u) −1 ) , (9) where the variables Y (i) m (u) now carry the spectral parameter u ∈ C. The Y -system (9) appears in the thermodynamic Bethe ansatz (TBA) analysis of the deformation of conformal field theory. A constant solution Y (i) m := Y (i) m (u) of (9), which is constant with respect to u, satisfies the constant Y -system (4), that also appears in the TBA analysis to calculate the effective central charge of conformal field theory. The Y -system (9) has the following two remarkable properties. (i) Periodicity Y (i) m (u+ 2(h+ `)) = Y (i) m (u). (10) Note on Dilogarithm Identities 5 (ii) Dilogarithm identity. For any positive real solution of (9), the following identity holds 6 π2 2(h+`)−1∑ u=0 n∑ i=1 `−1∑ m=1 L ( Y (i) m (u) 1 + Y (i) m (u) ) = 2(`− 1)nh. (11) The identity (5) is obtained by specializing the identity (11) to the (unique) positive real constant solution, and dividing the both hand sides of (5) by the period 2(h+ `). (b) Cluster algebras and dilogarithm identities. It was once formidable to prove the proper- ties (10) and (11) in full generality. However, they are now proved and rather well understood by the cluster algebraic method. In general, to any period of y-variables (coefficients) of a cluster algebra, the following dilogarithm identity is associated 6 π2 p∑ t=1 L ( ykt(t) 1 + ykt(t) ) = N−. (12) where k1, . . . , kp are the sequence of mutations for which y-variables are periodic, ykt(t) is the y-variable mutated at t, and N− is the total number of t ∈ {1, . . . , p} such that the tropical sign of ykt(t) is minus. One can apply this general result to our Y -system (9). First, the Y -system is embedded into the y-variables of a certain cluster algebra. Then, by proving the periodicity of y-variables of this cluster algebra, we obtain the periodicity (10) of the Y -system. Finally, from the general identity (12), we obtain the dilogarithm identity (11) by calculating the constant term N−. (c) Quantum cluster algebras and quantum dilogarithm identities. One can lift the result in (b) to the quantum case. Namely, any period of y-variables of a cluster algebra can be lifted to the period of quantum y-variables of the corresponding quantum cluster algebra. Then, to any such period, the quantum dilogarithm identity is associated; furthermore, taking the semiclassical limit of the quantum dilogarithm identity we recover the classical dilogarithm identity (12). We expect that the Rogers–Ramanujan type identities of [3] are also deduced from these quantum dilogarithm identities. Some result in this direction is obtained by [1]. Acknowledgements I thank Ivan Cherednik for raising this interesting question to me. References [1] Cecotti S., Neitzke A., Vafa C., R-twisting and 4d/2d correspondences, arXiv:1006.3435. [2] Chapoton F., Functional identities for the Rogers dilogarithm associated to cluster Y -systems, Bull. London Math. Soc. 37 (2005), 755–760. [3] Cherednik I., Feigin B., Rogers–Ramanujan type identities and Nil-DAHA, arXiv:1209.1978 (especially version 2). [4] Inoue R., Iyama O., Keller B., Kuniba A., Nakanishi T., Periodicities of T - and Y -systems, dilogarithm identities, and cluster algebras I: Type Br, Publ. Res. Inst. Math. Sci., to appear, arXiv:1001.1880. [5] Inoue R., Iyama O., Keller B., Kuniba A., Nakanishi T., Periodicities of T - and Y -systems, dilogarithm iden- tities, and cluster algebras II: Types Cr, F4, and G2, Publ. Res. Inst. Math. Sci., to appear, arXiv:1001.1881. [6] Inoue R., Iyama O., Kuniba A., Nakanishi T., Suzuki J., Periodicities of T -systems and Y -systems, Nagoya Math. J. 197 (2010), 59–174, arXiv:0812.0667. [7] Kashaev R.M., Nakanishi T., Classical and quantum dilogarithm identities, SIGMA 7 (2011), 102, 29 pages, arXiv:1104.4630. [8] Lee C.H., Nahm’s conjecture and Y -system, arXiv:1109.3667. [9] Nakanishi T., Dilogarithm identities for conformal field theories and cluster algebras: simply laced case, Nagoya Math. J. 202 (2011), 23–43, arXiv:0909.5480. http://arxiv.org/abs/1006.3435 http://dx.doi.org/10.1112/S0024609305004510 http://dx.doi.org/10.1112/S0024609305004510 http://arxiv.org/abs/1209.1978 http://arxiv.org/abs/1001.1880 http://arxiv.org/abs/1001.1881 http://arxiv.org/abs/0812.0667 http://dx.doi.org/10.3842/SIGMA.2011.102 http://arxiv.org/abs/1104.4630 http://arxiv.org/abs/1109.3667 http://arxiv.org/abs/0909.5480 1 Dilogarithm identities from Nil-DAHA 2 Dilogarithm identities for Y-systems of simply laced type 3 Identification with Y-systems from quantum affine Kac-Moody algebras 3.1 The non- case 3.2 The case 4 Connection to cluster algebraic method References
id nasplib_isofts_kiev_ua-123456789-149184
institution Digital Library of Periodicals of National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine
issn 1815-0659
language English
last_indexed 2025-12-07T17:46:39Z
publishDate 2012
publisher Інститут математики НАН України
record_format dspace
spelling Nakanishi, T.
2019-02-19T18:21:40Z
2019-02-19T18:21:40Z
2012
Note on Dilogarithm Identities from Nilpotent Double Affine Hecke Algebras / T. Nakanishi // Symmetry, Integrability and Geometry: Methods and Applications. — 2012. — Т. 8. — Бібліогр.: 9 назв. — англ.
1815-0659
2010 Mathematics Subject Classification: 17B37; 13F60
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3842/SIGMA.2012.104
https://nasplib.isofts.kiev.ua/handle/123456789/149184
Recently Cherednik and Feigin [arXiv:1209.1978] obtained several Rogers-Ramanujan type identities via the nilpotent double affine Hecke algebras (Nil-DAHA). These identities further led to a series of dilogarithm identities, some of which are known, while some are left conjectural. We confirm and explain all of them by showing the connection with Y-systems associated with (untwisted and twisted) quantum affine Kac-Moody algebras.
I thank Ivan Cherednik for raising this interesting question to me.
en
Інститут математики НАН України
Symmetry, Integrability and Geometry: Methods and Applications
Note on Dilogarithm Identities from Nilpotent Double Affine Hecke Algebras
Article
published earlier
spellingShingle Note on Dilogarithm Identities from Nilpotent Double Affine Hecke Algebras
Nakanishi, T.
title Note on Dilogarithm Identities from Nilpotent Double Affine Hecke Algebras
title_full Note on Dilogarithm Identities from Nilpotent Double Affine Hecke Algebras
title_fullStr Note on Dilogarithm Identities from Nilpotent Double Affine Hecke Algebras
title_full_unstemmed Note on Dilogarithm Identities from Nilpotent Double Affine Hecke Algebras
title_short Note on Dilogarithm Identities from Nilpotent Double Affine Hecke Algebras
title_sort note on dilogarithm identities from nilpotent double affine hecke algebras
url https://nasplib.isofts.kiev.ua/handle/123456789/149184
work_keys_str_mv AT nakanishit noteondilogarithmidentitiesfromnilpotentdoubleaffineheckealgebras