Study of the activity of DNA polymerases β and λ using 5-formyluridine containing DNA substrates

Цель. Исследовать TLS-активность ДНК-полимераз β и λ человека на ДНК-дуплексах, содержащих 5-формилуридин (5-foU) и имитирующих интермедиаты репликации лидирующей цепи геномной ДНК, а также влияние на нее репликативных факторов hRPA и hPCNA. Методы. «Задержка в геле» (EMSA), ферментативная кинетика....

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Вiopolymers and Cell
Date:2012
Main Authors: Belousova, E.A., Lavrik, O.I.
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Інститут молекулярної біології і генетики НАН України 2012
Subjects:
Online Access:https://nasplib.isofts.kiev.ua/handle/123456789/156849
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Journal Title:Digital Library of Periodicals of National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine
Cite this:Study of the activity of DNA polymerases β and λ using 5-formyluridine containing DNA substrates / E.A. Belousova, O.I. Lavrik // Вiopolymers and Cell. — 2012. — Т. 28, № 3. — С. 218–222. — Бібліогр.: 21 назв. — англ.

Institution

Digital Library of Periodicals of National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine
_version_ 1860001331349028864
author Belousova, E.A.
Lavrik, O.I.
author_facet Belousova, E.A.
Lavrik, O.I.
citation_txt Study of the activity of DNA polymerases β and λ using 5-formyluridine containing DNA substrates / E.A. Belousova, O.I. Lavrik // Вiopolymers and Cell. — 2012. — Т. 28, № 3. — С. 218–222. — Бібліогр.: 21 назв. — англ.
collection DSpace DC
container_title Вiopolymers and Cell
description Цель. Исследовать TLS-активность ДНК-полимераз β и λ человека на ДНК-дуплексах, содержащих 5-формилуридин (5-foU) и имитирующих интермедиаты репликации лидирующей цепи геномной ДНК, а также влияние на нее репликативных факторов hRPA и hPCNA. Методы. «Задержка в геле» (EMSA), ферментативная кинетика. Результаты. Изучена способность ДНК-полимераз β и λ катализировать синтез ДНК через 5-foU. Определены кинетические характеристики этого процесса в отсутствие и в присутствии белковых факторов hRPA и hPCNA. Выводы. Показано, что: 1) оба фермента способны вести TLS на использованных ДНК-субстратах независимо от условий реакции, однако ДНК-полимераза λ оказалась более точным ферментом; 2) hRPA стимулирует эффективность немутагенного TLS, катализируемого ДНК-полимеразой λ, непосредственно при встраивании нуклеотида напротив 5-foU и не влияет на эффективность этого процесса в том случае, когда повреждение сдвинуто в дуплексную часть ДНК; 3) hPCNA не влияет на эффективность TLS, катализируемого обоими ферментами.
 Kлючевые слова: синтез ДНК через повреждение, ДНК-полимеразы β и λ, 5-формилуридин. Мета. Дослідити активність TLS ДНК-полімераз β і λ людини на ДНК-дуплексах, які містять 5-формілуридин (5-foU) та імітують інтермедіати реплікації лідируючого ланцюга геномної ДНК, а також вплив на неї реплікативних факторів hRPA и hPCNA. Методи. «Затримка в гелі» (EMSA), ферментативна кінетика. Результати. Вивчено здатність ДНК-полімераз β і λ активувати синтез ДНК через 5-foU. Визначено кінетичні характеристики цього процесу за відсутності та в присутності білкових факторів hRPA і hPCNA. Висновки. Показано, що 1) обидва ферменти можуть вести TLS на використаних ДНК-субстратах незалежно від умов реакції, однак ДНК-полімераза λ виявилася точнішим ферментом; 2) hRPA стимулює ефективність немутагенного TLS, каталізованого ДНК-полімеразою λ, безпосередньо при вбудовуванні нуклеотиду навпроти 5-foU і не діє на ефективність цього процесу у тому разі, коли пошкодження зсунуте в дуплексну частину ДНК; 3) hPCNA не впливає на ефективність TLS, каталізованого обома ферментами
 Ключові слова: синтез ДНК через пошкодження, ДНК-полімерази β і λ, 5-формілуридин. Aims. To investigate the TLS-activity of human DNA polymerases β and λ (pols β and λ) using 5-formyluridine (5-foU) containing DNA duplexes which are imitating the intermediates during replication of the leading DNA strand, and to study the influence ofreplication factors hRPA and hPCNA on this activity. Methods. The EMSA and the methods of enzyme’s kinetics were used. Results. The capability of pols β and λ to catalyze DNA synthesis across 5-foU was investigated and the kinetic characteristics of this process in the presence and in the absence of protein factors hRPA and hPCNA were evaluated. Conclusions. It was shown that: (i) both proteins are able to catalyze TLS on used DNA substrates regardless of the reaction conditions, however, pol λ was more accurate enzyme; (ii) hRPA can stimulate the efficacy of the nonmutagenic TLS catalyzed by pol λ at the nucleotide incorporation directly opposite of 5-foU, at the same time it doesn’t influence the incorporation efficacy if the damage displaced into the duplex; (iii) hPCNA doesn’t influence the efficacy of TLS catalyzed by both enzymes.
 Keywords: translesion synthesis, DNA polymerases β and λ, 5-formyluridine.
first_indexed 2025-12-07T16:36:08Z
format Article
fulltext 218 UDC 577.151.45; 57.037; 577.325.5 Study of the activity of DNA polymerases β and λ using 5-formyluridine containing DNA substrates E. A. Belousova, O. I. Lavrik Novosibirsk Institute of Chemical Biology and Fundamental Medicine, Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences 8, Akademika Lavrentieva Ave., Novosibirsk, Russian Federation, 630090 sheffield@ngs.ru Aims. To investigate the TLS-activity of human DNA polymerases β and λ (pols β and λ) using 5-formyluridine (5-foU) containing DNA duplexes which are imitating the intermediates during replication of the leading DNA strand, and to study the influence of replication factors hRPA and hPCNA on this activity. Methods. The EMSA and the methods of enzyme’s kinetics were used. Results. The capability of pols β and λ to catalyze DNA synthesis ac- ross 5-foU was investigated and the kinetic characteristics of this process in the presence and in the absence of protein factors hRPA and hPCNA were evaluated. Conclusions. It was shown that: (i) both proteins are able to catalyze TLS on used DNA substrates regardless of the reaction conditions, however, pol λ was more accurate en- zyme; (ii) hRPA can stimulate the efficacy of the nonmutagenic TLS catalyzed by pol λ at the nucleotide incor- poration directly opposite of 5-foU, at the same time it doesn’t influence the incorporation efficacy if the damage displaced into the duplex; (iii) hPCNA doesn’t influence the efficacy of TLS catalyzed by both enzymes. Keywords: translesion synthesis, DNA polymerases β and λ , 5-formyluridine. Introduction. Nucleobases are chemically modified un- der the influence of environmental or organic factors. One of the major product of the thymine oxidation un- der UVA and ionized irradiation is 5-formyluridine, 5- foU. The presence of 5-foU in the DNA doesn’t lead to replication block of both DNA strands, however replica- tive DNA polymerases such as Klenow fragment, DNA polymerase alfa and gamma are able to incorporate any of all 4 dNTPs opposite 5-foU allowing for transition and transversions [1]. Translesion synthesis is one of the main strategies which is used by cell for replication of damaged DNA. It is known, that TLS is catalyzed by special DNA poly- merases with majority them belonging to the Y-family [2]. However, some data exists that indicate the role of X-family DNA polymerases β and λ in TLS [3]. The set of in vitro experiments fulfilled using diffe- rent damaged DNA substrates indicate that the efficacy of the nucleotide incorporation opposite the lesion and the capability to catalyze DNA synthesis passing the le- sion are varied for different DNA polymerases. Since TLS occurred directly in the replication complex, such replicative factors as PCNA and RPA can influence ef- ficacy and accuracy of the TLS polymerases. Some ex- periments were already done but the result doesn’t complete the full relations – in common, PCNA and RPA influence dependent from type of DNA lesion and spe- cific DNA polymerase [4]. Therefore, here we attended to investigate the TLS activity of human DNA polymerases β and λ (pols β and λ) using DNA duplexes with 5-foU in a template by ki- netic approaches. As for DNA substrates we used pri- med DNA duplexes which imitate the TLS interme- diates during the replication of the leading strand. Reac- tions were carried out in «high» and «low» levels fi- delity of polymerization conditions that is in the presen- ce of Mg2+ or Mn2+ ions, respectively. Materials and methods. The following substances were used: BSA («New England Biolabs», USA); phage T4 polynucleotide kinase (5000 U/ml, «Biosan», Rus- ISSN 0233–7657. Biopolymers and Cell. 2012. Vol. 28. N 3. P. 218–222  Institute of Molecular Biology and Genetics, NAS of Ukraine, 2012 219 BELOUSOVA E. A., LAVRIK O. I. sia); [γ-32P]ATP with specific activity 5000 Ci/mmol (LBT ICBFM SB RAS); dNTP, reagents for electropho- resis and the main buffers components («Sigma», USA). Human recombinant pols β and λ were purified from Es- cherichia coli BL21(DE3) RP cells as described in [5] and [6], correspondingly. Purified hRPA and hPCNA were kindly provided by I. O. Petruseva (LBCE ICBFM SB RAS). The following oligonucleotides were used: primer strand 5'-(d)CGGTATCCACCAGGTCTG-3' («GenSet», Switzerland); template strand 5'-(d)GGCT TCATCGTTGTCU5-foCAGACCTGGTGGATACCG- 3' (synthesized and kindly provided by T. S. Zatsepin, A. N. Belozersky Institute of Physico-Chemical Biology, Moscow State University). Incorporation of the radioactive label into the 5'- end of the primer was performed as described in [7]. Determination of the Kd values for the DNA-pro- tein complexes by EMSA was performed as described in [8]. dNMP were incorporated into the 3'-end of primer by DNA pols β and λ. Reactions mixtures (10 µl) con- tained 0.01 µM 5'-[32P]labeled DNA substrate, 0.01 µM pol, 5 µM dNTP, 1 mM MgCl2 or MnCl2 in TDB buffer (50 mM Тris-HCl, рН 8.0, 0.5 mM DTT, 0.25 mg/ml BSA). All reactions were incubated at 37 oC for 15 min. The reactions were terminated by placement on ice. Re- action products were resolved by electrophoresis in 20 % denaturant PAAG as described in [9] and subjected to autoradiography using Molecular Imager FX («Bio- Rad», USA). Analysis was performed with the Quan- tity One («BioRad»). The Michaelis constants and the maximal rates of DNA synthesis were determined as described in [10]. The data were fitted according to Michaelis-Menten ki- netic equation. The effect of hRPA and hPCNA on the polymeri- zation reaction catalyzed by pols β and λ was studied as follow. The reaction mixtures (10 µl) contained 0.01 µM 5'-[32P]labeled DNA substrate, 0.01 µM pol, 0.5– 200 µM dNTP, 1 mM MgCl2 or MnCl2, hRPA or/and hPCNA in TDB buffer. The hRPA concentration was 5, 10 or 20 nM (in a ratio DNA:hRPA = 2:1, 1:1, 1:2). The hPCNA concentration was 50, 100 or 200 nM (in a ratio DNA:hPCNA = 1:5, 1:10, 1:20). The combined ef- fect of hPCNA and hRPA was investigated by setting the hPCNA concentration at 100 nM (in a ratio DNA : : hRPA = 2:1, 1:1, 1:2). The reaction was performed at 37 °C for 15 min and terminated by placement on ice. The reaction products were analyzed as described above. Results and discussion. In the present work we stu- died the TLS activity of pols β and λ on DNA substra- tes mimicking the TLS intermediates during the replica- tion of the leading strand. 5-foU located in the +1 po- sition of the template strand with respect to the 3'-end of the primer was used as a lesion. To estimate the affinity of the selected DNA pols to DNA probes we carried out gel mobility shift assays. Data obtained indicate that introduction of the 5-foU de- crease the affinity of pol β to DNA substrate containing single-stranded protruding 5'-end (Kd ~ 0.18 µM for un- damaged DNA and ~ 0.53 µM for 5-foU-DNA). The sa- me modification of the DNA substrate result in decrea- se of Kd value, i. e. to increase of the pol λ affinity to the DNA used (0.36 µM for undamaged DNA and ~0.18 µM for 5-foU-DNA). To determine which dNMP could be incorporated in the model system DNA synthesis was carried out in the presence of either one or all four dNTPs (Figure, B). It’s easy to see that pol λ was more accurate during DNA synthesis across 5-foU – the enzyme was able to cataly- ze the incorporation of dAMP which is the complement to the template dTMP. Insignificant incorporation of dGMP in the presence of Mn2+ ions (not more than 5 %) can be explained by «template slippage» mechanism clarified for pol λ [11]. In any case, kinetic characte- ristics of the incorporation of correct nucleotide charac- terized dATP as more effective substrate (for example, Km (dATP/Mn2+) ~0.07 µM, Кm (dGTP/Mn2+) ~0.15 µM). Pol β proved itself as extremely inaccurate enzyme which is able to catalyze the incorporation of all dNTP opposite 5-foU (Figure, A). The incorporation of dGMP can be explained by «template slippage» mechanism [11], and the incorporation of dAMP and dTMP pro- bably is the result of a low fidelity of pol β [12]. In any case, the efficacy of the incorporation of correct dAMP was much higher with comparison of the incorporation efficacy of incorrect dGMP (kcat/Km (dATP/Mg2+) ~0.051 µM–1s–1, kcat/Km (dGTP/Mg2+) ~0.005 µM–1s–1). Thus, independently of the reaction conditions both enzymes are able to catalyze TLS process using descri- bed DNA. However, pol β doesn’t have the specificity at the passage of this type of damage. At the same time, 220 SYNTHESIS BY DNA POLYMERASES β AND λ ACROSS 5-foU pol λ is able to catalyze the incorporation of correct dAMP which is the complement to the original dTMP, thereby maintaining initial DNA sequence and doesn’t force point mutations. Since TLS constitutively associated with the repli- cation machinery, replication and repair proteins could play a key role during this process. One of the potential TLS-participant during the replication on the leading strand is hRPA which contain subunits p70, p32 and p14 [13]. The main function of RPA include stabiliza- tion of DNA in a single-stranded conformation, posi- tioning of the proteins at the nucleic-protein comple- xes, and activity stimulation of other protein factors. Here the efficacy of DNA synthesis in the presence of hRPA was estimated by comparing the kinetic para- meters for incorporation of correct dAMP or incorrect dGMP (Tables 1 and 2). As can be seen from presented results, the presence of hRPA doesn’t influence the TLS efficacy catalyzed by pol β. Contrariwise, the efficacy of nonmutagenic TLS catalyzed by pol λ was enhanced by hRPA by not affecting the dAMP incorporation and negatively affecting the dGMP incorporation (Table 2). Interestingly, the presence of hRPA doesn’t influence on the activity of pol λ during the next step of DNA syn- thesis, i. e. in the case when 5-foU is located in the 0 po- sition of the template strand with respect to the 3'-end of the primer (Table 2). The next inherent component of the replication ma- chinery is PCNA. First of all, PCNA is a processivity factor for the replicative DNA pols. Additionally, it par- ticipates in the coordination of protein-protein interac- tion in the replication complex [14]. Moreover, due to the majority of different proteins interacting with PCNA it can be suggested as a link between the replication and other cell’s process such as TLS. Particularly, hPCNA has been proposed to coordinate switching from replica- tive DNA pols to specialized TLS enzymes [15]. Fur- ther, it has been demonstrated that PCNA physically in- teracts with pols β and λ [16, 17]. The influence of hPCNA on TLS-activity of pols β and λ was estimated as described above. It turned out, that hPCNA doesn’t influence the TLS efficacy of both pols using 5-foU-containing DNA substrates (Tables 1 and 2). These data are consistent with already publi- shed results: it was found, that PCNA increase the affi- nity of pol λ to the 3'-end of the primer, stabilize the for- mation complex between the DNA substrate and enzy- me, which allows to increase the processivity of DNA synthesis using undamaged DNA but doesn’t change the enzyme affinity to dNTP and the efficacy of correct nucleotide incorporation [18]. At the same time, no alte- ration of the interplay between pol β and damaged DNA in the presence of PCNA was obtained [4]. Absence of cumulative effect of hRPA and hPCNA on TLS-activity of pol β across 5-foU was shown (Tab- le 1). In contrast, combine presence of two protein fac- tors lead to increase of accuracy of TLS catalyzed by DNA pol λ mainly due to the increasing of the incorpo- ration of correct dAMP (Table 2). Therefore, hRPA has stimulated the efficacy of non- mutagenic TLS catalyzed by pol λ at the incorporation of dNMP opposite to 5-foU and didn’t have influence C 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 A G T C N A G T C N A G T C N A G T C N 18 nt → 19 nt → 34 nt → A B C 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Mg2+ Mg2+Mn2+ Mn2+ DNA synthesis catalyzed by pols β (A) and λ (B) using 5-foU-contai- ning DNA substrates on the reaction if the synthesis starts from the 0 position relative to the damage. Combined effect of hRPA and hPCNA analogously increase the accuracy of TLS across 5-foU catalyzed by pol λ mainly due to the increasing of the incorporation of correct dNMP. Basically, obtained results are in accordance with the published data. Indeed, it was shown using 5'-ex- tended DNA substrates that TLS-activity of pol λ ac- ross oxidative damages can be modulated by hRPA [4, 19–21]. At the same time, hRPA didn’t display any ef- fect on the TLS-capacity of pol β across oxidative da- mages [4]. Combining the obtained results with published data it can be conclude, that pol λ plays an important role in TLS across 5-foU during genomic replication on the leading strand. Acknowledgements. This work was supported by a grant from the Russian Foundation for Basic Research (N12-04-00178-а). Є. А. Бе ло у со ва, О. І. Лав рик Активність ДНК-поліме раз β і λ при син тезі ДНК-суб стратів, які містять 5-формілу ри дин Ре зю ме Мета. Дослідити ак тивність TLS ДНК-поліме раз β і λ лю ди ни на ДНК-дуп лек сах, які містять 5-формілу ри дин (5-foU) та іміту ють інтер медіати реплікації ліди ру ю чо го лан цю га ге ном ної ДНК, а та- кож вплив на неї репліка тив них фак торів hRPA и hPCNA. Мето- ди. «Затрим ка в гелі» (EMSA), фер мен та тив на кіне ти ка. Ре зуль - та ти. Вив че но здатність ДНК-поліме раз β і λ ак ти ву ва ти син тез ДНК че рез 5-foU. Виз на че но кіне тичні ха рак те рис ти ки цьо го про- цесу за відсут ності та в при сут ності білко вих фак торів hRPA і hPCNA. Вис нов ки. По ка за но, що 1) об ид ва фер мен ти мо жуть ве- сти TLS на ви ко рис та них ДНК-суб стра тах не за леж но від умов ре акції, однак ДНК-поліме ра за λ ви я ви ла ся точнішим фермен том; 2) hRPA сти му лює ефек тивність не му та ген но го TLS, ка талізова- ного ДНК-поліме ра зою λ, без по се ред ньо при вбу до ву ванні нук ле о - ти ду на впро ти 5-foU і не діє на ефек тивність цьо го про цесу у тому разі, коли по шкод жен ня зсу ну те в дуп лек сну час ти ну ДНК; 3) hPCNA не впли ває на ефек тивність TLS, ка талізо ва но го об ома фер мен та ми. Клю чові сло ва: син тез ДНК че рез по шкод жен ня, ДНК-поліме - ра зи β и λ, 5-формілу ри дин. 221 BELOUSOVA E. A., LAVRIK O. I. dNTP Mg2+ Mn2+ – Replication factor + hRPA + hPCNA hRPA/hPCNA – Replication factor + hRPA + hPCNA hRPA/hPCNA dATP 0.051 0.055 0.049 0.052 12.6 12.9 12.1 12.9 dGTP 0.005 0.006 0.006 0.006 0.31 0.33 0.29 0.35 (kcat/Km)incor/ (kcat/Km)cor* 0.101 0.099 0.119 0.108 0.024 0.026 0.024 0.027 The values shown were obtained under the conditions when replication factors were present at the maximal concentrations; *(kcat/Km)incor/(kcat/Km)cor values in the presence or absence of replicaton factors. Note: the results are presented as the average value of three independent experiments. Table 1 The efficacy of dNTP incorporation by pol β (kcat/Km, µM–1s–1) dNTP – Replication factor + hRPA + hPCNA hRPA/hPCNA – Replication factor** + hRPA** dATP 0.111 0.108 0.116 0.401 – – dGTP 0.302 0.008 0.287 0.365 0.137 0.126 (kcat/Km)incor/ (kcat/Km)cor* 2.72 0.08 2.47 0.91 – – The values shown were obtained under the conditions when replication factors were present at the maximal concentrations; *(kcat/Km)incor/(kcat/Km)cor values in the presence or absence of replicaton factors; **the efficacy constant values for DNA synthesis using DNA with + 1 primer length. Note: the results are presented as the average value of three independent experiments. Standard error was estimated as 10 %. Table 2 The efficacy of dNTP incorporation by pol λ in the presence of Mn2+ ions Е. А. Бе ло у со ва, О. И. Лав рик Активность ДНК-по ли ме раз β и λ при син те зе ДНК-суб стра тов, со - дер жа щих 5-фор ми лу ри дин Ре зю ме Цель. Иссле до вать TLS-ак тив ность ДНК-по ли ме раз β и λ че ло ве- ка на ДНК-дуп лек сах, со дер жа щих 5-фор ми лу ри дин (5-foU) и ими- ти ру ю щих ин тер ме ди а ты реп ли ка ции ли ди ру ю щей цепи ге ном - ной ДНК, а так же вли я ние на нее реп ли ка тив ных фак то ров hRPA и hPCNA. Ме то ды. «За дер жка в геле» (EMSA), фер мен та тив ная ки не ти ка. Ре зуль та ты. Изу че на спо соб ность ДНК-по ли ме раз β и λ ка та ли зи ро вать син тез ДНК че рез 5-foU. Опре де ле ны ки не ти- чес кие ха рак те рис ти ки это го про цес са в от су тствие и в при сут- ствии бел ко вых фак то ров hRPA и hPCNA. Вы во ды. По ка за но, что: 1) оба фер мен та спо соб ны вести TLS на ис поль зо ван ных ДНК-суб стра тах не за ви си мо от усло вий ре ак ции, одна ко ДНК- по ли ме ра за λ ока за лась бо лее точ ным фер мен том; 2) hRPA сти - му ли ру ет эф фек тив ность не му та ген но го TLS, ка та ли зи ру е мо го ДНК-по ли ме ра зой λ, не пос ре дствен но при встра и ва нии нук ле о - ти да на про тив 5-foU и не вли я ет на эф фек тив ность это го про - цес са в том слу чае, ког да по вреж де ние сдви ну то в дуп лек сную часть ДНК; 3) hPCNA не вли я ет на эф фек тив ность TLS, ка та ли - зи ру е мо го об ои ми фер мен та ми. Клю че вые сло ва: син тез ДНК че рез по вреж де ние, ДНК-по ли - меразы β и λ, 5-фор ми лу ри дин. REFERENCES 1. Bjelland S., Anensen H., Knaevelsrud I., Seeberg E. Cellular effects of 5-formyluracil in DNA // Mutat. Res.–2001.–486, N 2.–P. 147–154. 2. Ohmori H., Friedberg E. C., Fuchs R. P., Goodman M. F., Ha- naoka F., Hinkle D., Kunkel T. A., Lawrence C. W., Livneh Z., Nohmi T., Prakash L., Prakash S., Todo T., Walker G. C., Wang Z., Woodgate R. The Y-family of DNA polymerases // Mol. Cell.–2001.–8, N 1.–P. 7–8. 3. Belousova E. A., Lavrik O. I. DNA polymerases beta and lamb- da, and their roles in the DNA replication and repair // Mol. Biol. (Moscow).–2010.–44, N 6.–P. 947–965. 4. Maga G., Villani G., Crespan E., Wimmer U., Ferrari E., Bertoc- ci B., Hubscher U. 8-oxo-guanine bypass by human DNA poly- merases in the presence of auxiliary proteins // Nature.–2007.– 447, N 7144.–P. 606–608. 5. Braithwaite E. K., Prasad R., Shock D. D., Hou E. W., Beard W. A., Wilson S. H. DNA polymerase lambda mediates a back-up base excision repair activity in extracts of mouse embryonic fib- roblasts // J. Biol. Chem.–2005.–280, N 18.–P. 18469–18475. 6. Drachkova I. A., Petruseva I. O., Safronov I. V., Zakharenko A. L., Shishkin G. V., Lavrik O. I., Khodyreva S. N. Reagents for modification of protein-nucleic acids complexes. II. Site-spe- cific photomodification of DNA-polymerase beta complexes with primers elongated by the dCTP exo-N-substituted arylazi- do derivatives // Bioorg. Khim.–2001.–27, N 3.–P. 197–204. 7. Mazin A. Label’s introducing into DNA // Methods of molecular genetics and gene engineering] / Ed. R. I. Salganik.–Novo- sibirsk: Science SBRAS, 1990.–P. 25–26. 8. Belousova E. A., Maga G., Fan Y., Kubareva E. A., Romanova E. A., Lebedeva N. A., Oretskaya T. S., Lavrik O. I. DNA poly- merases beta and lambda bypass thymine glycol in gapped DNA structures // Biochemistry.–2010.–49, N 22.–P. 4695–4704. 9. Kraev A. Sequencing gels // Methods of molecular genetics and gene engineering / Ed. R. I. Salganik.–Novosibirsk: Science SBRAS, 1990.–P. 145–153. 10. Shtygasheva A. A., Belousova E. A., Rechkunova N. I., Lebedeva N. A., Lavrik O. I. DNA polymerases beta and lambda as poten- tial participants of TLS during genomic DNA replication on the lagging strand // Biochemistry (Moscow).–2008.–73, N 11.– P. 1207–1213. 11. Blanca G., Villani G., Shevelev I., Ramadan K., Spadari S., Hub- scher U., Maga G. Human DNA polymerases lambda and beta show different efficiencies of translesion DNA synthesis past abasic sites and alternative mechanisms for frameshift genera- tion // Biochemistry.–2004.–43, N 36.–P. 11605–11615. 12. Kunkel T. A., Alexander P. S. The base substitution fidelity of eu- karyotic DNA polymerases. Mispairing frequencies, site prefe- rences, insertion preferences, and base substitution by disloca- tion // J. Biol. Chem.–1986.–261, N 1.–P. 160–166. 13. Fanning E., Klimovich V., Nager A. R. A dynamic model for rep- lication protein A (RPA) function in DNA processing pathways // Nucleic Acids Res.–2006.–34, N 15.–P. 4126–4137. 14. Maga G., Hubscher U. Proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA): a dancer with many partners // J. Cell Sci.–2003.–116, Pt 15.– P. 3051–3060. 15. Budzowska M., Kanaar R. Mechanisms of dealing with DNA da- mage-induced replication problems // Cell Biochem. Biophys.– 2009.–53, N 1.–P. 17–31. 16. Kedar P. S., Kim S. J., Robertson A., Hou E., Prasad R., Horton J. K., Wilson S. H. Direct interaction between mammalian DNA polymerase beta and proliferating cell nuclear antigen // J. Biol. Chem.–2002.–277, N 34.–P. 31115–31123. 17. Shimazaki N., Yazaki T., Kubota T., Sato A., Nakamura A., Ku- rei S., Toji S., Tamai K., Koiwai O. DNA polymerase lambda di- rectly binds to proliferating cell nuclear antigen through its con- fined C-terminal region // Genes Cells.–2005.–10, N 7.–P. 705– 715. 18. Maga G., Villani G., Ramadan K., Shevelev I., Tanguy Le Gac N., Blanco L., Blanca G., Spadari S., Hubscher U. Human DNA polymerase lambda functionally and physically interacts with proliferating cell nuclear antigen in normal and translesion DNA synthesis // J. Biol. Chem.–2002.–277, N 50.–P. 48434–48440. 19. Maga G., Shevelev I., Villani G., Spadari S., Hubscher U. Hu- man replication protein A can suppress the intrinsic in vitro mu- tator phenotype of human DNA polymerase lambda // Nucleic Acids Res.–2006.–34, N 5.–P. 1405–1415. 20. Crespan E., Hubscher U., Maga G. Error-free bypass of 2-hyd- roxyadenine by human DNA polymerase lambda with Prolife- rating Cell Nuclear Antigen and Replication Protein A in diffe- rent sequence contexts // Nucleic Acids Res.–2007.–35, N 15.– P. 5173–5181. 21. Krasikova Y. S., Belousova E. A., Lebedeva N. A., Pestryakov P. E., Lavrik O. I. Interaction between DNA Polymerase lambda and RPA during translesion synthesis // Biochemistry (Moscow).– 2008.–73, N 9.–P. 1042–1046. Received 10.04.12 222 SYNTHESIS BY DNA POLYMERASES β AND λ ACROSS 5-foU
id nasplib_isofts_kiev_ua-123456789-156849
institution Digital Library of Periodicals of National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine
issn 0233-7657
language English
last_indexed 2025-12-07T16:36:08Z
publishDate 2012
publisher Інститут молекулярної біології і генетики НАН України
record_format dspace
spelling Belousova, E.A.
Lavrik, O.I.
2019-06-19T06:55:43Z
2019-06-19T06:55:43Z
2012
Study of the activity of DNA polymerases β and λ using 5-formyluridine containing DNA substrates / E.A. Belousova, O.I. Lavrik // Вiopolymers and Cell. — 2012. — Т. 28, № 3. — С. 218–222. — Бібліогр.: 21 назв. — англ.
0233-7657
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.7124/bc.000051
https://nasplib.isofts.kiev.ua/handle/123456789/156849
577.151.45; 57.037; 577.325.5
Цель. Исследовать TLS-активность ДНК-полимераз β и λ человека на ДНК-дуплексах, содержащих 5-формилуридин (5-foU) и имитирующих интермедиаты репликации лидирующей цепи геномной ДНК, а также влияние на нее репликативных факторов hRPA и hPCNA. Методы. «Задержка в геле» (EMSA), ферментативная кинетика. Результаты. Изучена способность ДНК-полимераз β и λ катализировать синтез ДНК через 5-foU. Определены кинетические характеристики этого процесса в отсутствие и в присутствии белковых факторов hRPA и hPCNA. Выводы. Показано, что: 1) оба фермента способны вести TLS на использованных ДНК-субстратах независимо от условий реакции, однако ДНК-полимераза λ оказалась более точным ферментом; 2) hRPA стимулирует эффективность немутагенного TLS, катализируемого ДНК-полимеразой λ, непосредственно при встраивании нуклеотида напротив 5-foU и не влияет на эффективность этого процесса в том случае, когда повреждение сдвинуто в дуплексную часть ДНК; 3) hPCNA не влияет на эффективность TLS, катализируемого обоими ферментами.
 Kлючевые слова: синтез ДНК через повреждение, ДНК-полимеразы β и λ, 5-формилуридин.
Мета. Дослідити активність TLS ДНК-полімераз β і λ людини на ДНК-дуплексах, які містять 5-формілуридин (5-foU) та імітують інтермедіати реплікації лідируючого ланцюга геномної ДНК, а також вплив на неї реплікативних факторів hRPA и hPCNA. Методи. «Затримка в гелі» (EMSA), ферментативна кінетика. Результати. Вивчено здатність ДНК-полімераз β і λ активувати синтез ДНК через 5-foU. Визначено кінетичні характеристики цього процесу за відсутності та в присутності білкових факторів hRPA і hPCNA. Висновки. Показано, що 1) обидва ферменти можуть вести TLS на використаних ДНК-субстратах незалежно від умов реакції, однак ДНК-полімераза λ виявилася точнішим ферментом; 2) hRPA стимулює ефективність немутагенного TLS, каталізованого ДНК-полімеразою λ, безпосередньо при вбудовуванні нуклеотиду навпроти 5-foU і не діє на ефективність цього процесу у тому разі, коли пошкодження зсунуте в дуплексну частину ДНК; 3) hPCNA не впливає на ефективність TLS, каталізованого обома ферментами
 Ключові слова: синтез ДНК через пошкодження, ДНК-полімерази β і λ, 5-формілуридин.
Aims. To investigate the TLS-activity of human DNA polymerases β and λ (pols β and λ) using 5-formyluridine (5-foU) containing DNA duplexes which are imitating the intermediates during replication of the leading DNA strand, and to study the influence ofreplication factors hRPA and hPCNA on this activity. Methods. The EMSA and the methods of enzyme’s kinetics were used. Results. The capability of pols β and λ to catalyze DNA synthesis across 5-foU was investigated and the kinetic characteristics of this process in the presence and in the absence of protein factors hRPA and hPCNA were evaluated. Conclusions. It was shown that: (i) both proteins are able to catalyze TLS on used DNA substrates regardless of the reaction conditions, however, pol λ was more accurate enzyme; (ii) hRPA can stimulate the efficacy of the nonmutagenic TLS catalyzed by pol λ at the nucleotide incorporation directly opposite of 5-foU, at the same time it doesn’t influence the incorporation efficacy if the damage displaced into the duplex; (iii) hPCNA doesn’t influence the efficacy of TLS catalyzed by both enzymes.
 Keywords: translesion synthesis, DNA polymerases β and λ, 5-formyluridine.
en
Інститут молекулярної біології і генетики НАН України
Вiopolymers and Cell
Structure and Function of Biopolymers
Study of the activity of DNA polymerases β and λ using 5-formyluridine containing DNA substrates
Активність ДНК-полімераз β і λ при синтезі ДНК-субстратів, які містять 5-формілуридин
Активность ДНК-полимераз β и λ при синтезе ДНК-субстратов, содержащих 5-формилуридин
Article
published earlier
spellingShingle Study of the activity of DNA polymerases β and λ using 5-formyluridine containing DNA substrates
Belousova, E.A.
Lavrik, O.I.
Structure and Function of Biopolymers
title Study of the activity of DNA polymerases β and λ using 5-formyluridine containing DNA substrates
title_alt Активність ДНК-полімераз β і λ при синтезі ДНК-субстратів, які містять 5-формілуридин
Активность ДНК-полимераз β и λ при синтезе ДНК-субстратов, содержащих 5-формилуридин
title_full Study of the activity of DNA polymerases β and λ using 5-formyluridine containing DNA substrates
title_fullStr Study of the activity of DNA polymerases β and λ using 5-formyluridine containing DNA substrates
title_full_unstemmed Study of the activity of DNA polymerases β and λ using 5-formyluridine containing DNA substrates
title_short Study of the activity of DNA polymerases β and λ using 5-formyluridine containing DNA substrates
title_sort study of the activity of dna polymerases β and λ using 5-formyluridine containing dna substrates
topic Structure and Function of Biopolymers
topic_facet Structure and Function of Biopolymers
url https://nasplib.isofts.kiev.ua/handle/123456789/156849
work_keys_str_mv AT belousovaea studyoftheactivityofdnapolymerasesβandλusing5formyluridinecontainingdnasubstrates
AT lavrikoi studyoftheactivityofdnapolymerasesβandλusing5formyluridinecontainingdnasubstrates
AT belousovaea aktivnístʹdnkpolímerazβíλprisintezídnksubstratívâkímístâtʹ5formíluridin
AT lavrikoi aktivnístʹdnkpolímerazβíλprisintezídnksubstratívâkímístâtʹ5formíluridin
AT belousovaea aktivnostʹdnkpolimerazβiλprisintezednksubstratovsoderžaŝih5formiluridin
AT lavrikoi aktivnostʹdnkpolimerazβiλprisintezednksubstratovsoderžaŝih5formiluridin