Археологічне та археомагнітне датування волинцевських комплексів Ходосівського поселення

• Veröffentlicht in: Археологія і давня історія України
• Datum: 2018
• 1. Verfasser: Комар, О.В.
• Format: Artikel
• Sprache: Ukrainisch
• Veröffentlicht: Інститут археології НАН України 2018
• Schlagworte: Археологія і природничі науки
• Online Zugang: https://nasplib.isofts.kiev.ua/handle/123456789/162330
• Назва журналу: Digital Library of Periodicals of National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine
• Zitieren: Археологічне та археомагнітне датування волинцевських комплексів Ходосівського поселення / О.В. Комар // Археологія і давня історія України: Зб. наук. пр. — К.: ІА НАН України, 2018. — Вип. 3 (28). — С. 168-191. — укр.

У статті здійснено верифікацію результатів археомагнітного датування двох жител волинцевської культури з поселення Ходосівка-Козаків яр
 за допомогою сучасних археологічних даних та програмного додатку Matlab tool for archaeomagnetic dating. In 1972, two ovens from dwellings of the Volyntseve culture were studied with archaeomagnetic method by G. F. Zagnii. Proposed archaeomagnetic dating for the oven from Khodosivka dwelling 2 («6th century AD») was different from the archaeological date for two
 centuries, thence both archaeomagnetic dates seemed unreliable and they were never used in archaeological
 research as a chronological marker for the Volyntseve culture. The task of this study was to determine whether it
 is possible to verify old archaeomagnetic data with the help of modern analysis tools and to compare it with
 recent archaeological datings of the same complexes. Finds from Hodosivka dwellings 1 and 2 include iron
 buckle, belt ornament, earring, glass beads of the Saltiv cultural circle and wheel-made pottery of the Saltiv
 technology, that allows using detailed chronological scale of the Saltiv culture and limiting the chronological
 framework for dwellings 1 to 790—835 AD and for the stratigraphically earlier dwellings 2 to 740—790 AD.
 Analysis of archaeomagnetic data was made with Matlab tool for archaeomagnetic dating software and
 three global models: ARCH3K.1, SHA.DIF.14K and CALS3K.3. Two versions of the archaeomagnetic data
 were examined. First version of data (1977) presented only declination and inclination values, calculated
 with larger number of measured samples accepted; later version (1986) reflects data with fewer samples
 accepted after the procedure for excluding extreme values and also field intensity values. Comparison showed
 that the later version of the data is much better consistent with archaeological dates and must be used as
 basic. The results of 95 % probability archaeomagnetic
 dating of the dwelling № 1 in all three used models ARCH3K.1, SHA.DIF.14K and CALS3K.3 are in good
 agreement with archaeological date: respectively 752—845; 758—855; 678—858 AD. Agreement is less precise
 in archaeomagnetic dating of the dwelling № 2: respectively 677—784; 702—802; 622—745, 770—814 AD,
 where only the second part of the time range corresponds to the archaeological dating. However, both
 new results are acceptable, which means the presence of a chronological error in the local archaeomagnetic
 curve of G. F. Zagnii and O. M. Rusakov, created for the territory of Ukraine and Moldova. This conclusion
 means that all Early Mediaeval chronological schemes in archaeology based on this archaeomagnetic curve
 needs verification of archaeomagnetic data using modern databases and global models.