On fundamental group of Riemannian manifolds with ommited fractal subsets

We show that if K is a closed and bounded subset of a Riemannian manifold M of dimension m>3, and the fractal dimension of K is less than m−3, then the fundamental groups of M and M−K are isomorphic. Показано, що якщо K — замкнена й обмежена пiдмножина рiманового многовиду M розмiрностi m>3, а...

Повний опис

Збережено в:
Бібліографічні деталі
Опубліковано в: :Український математичний журнал
Дата:2011
Автор: Mirzaie, R.
Формат: Стаття
Мова:Англійська
Опубліковано: Інститут математики НАН України 2011
Теми:
Онлайн доступ:https://nasplib.isofts.kiev.ua/handle/123456789/166254
Теги: Додати тег
Немає тегів, Будьте першим, хто поставить тег для цього запису!
Назва журналу:Digital Library of Periodicals of National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine
Цитувати:On fundamental group of Riemannian manifolds with ommited fractal subsets / R. Mirzaie // Український математичний журнал. — 2011. — Т. 63, № 6. — С. 854–858. — Бібліогр.: 3 назв. — англ.

Репозитарії

Digital Library of Periodicals of National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine
_version_ 1860197858195537920
author Mirzaie, R.
author_facet Mirzaie, R.
citation_txt On fundamental group of Riemannian manifolds with ommited fractal subsets / R. Mirzaie // Український математичний журнал. — 2011. — Т. 63, № 6. — С. 854–858. — Бібліогр.: 3 назв. — англ.
collection DSpace DC
container_title Український математичний журнал
description We show that if K is a closed and bounded subset of a Riemannian manifold M of dimension m>3, and the fractal dimension of K is less than m−3, then the fundamental groups of M and M−K are isomorphic. Показано, що якщо K — замкнена й обмежена пiдмножина рiманового многовиду M розмiрностi m>3, а фрактальна розмiрнiсть K менша за m−3, то фундаментальнi групи M i M−K є iзоморфними.
first_indexed 2025-12-07T18:09:24Z
format Article
fulltext UDC 512.5 R. Mirzaie (I. Kh. Int. Univ. (IKIU) Qazvin, Iran) ON FUNDAMENTAL GROUP OF RIEMANNIAN MANIFOLDS WITH OMITTED FRACTAL SUBSETS ПРО ФУНДАМЕНТАЛЬНУ ГРУПУ РIМАНОВИХ МНОГОВИДIВ З ПРОПУЩЕНИМИ ФРАКТАЛЬНИМИ ПIДМНОЖИНАМИ We show that if K is a closed and bounded subset of a Riemannian manifold M of dimension m > 3, and the fractal dimension of K is less than m− 3, then the fundamental groups of M and M −K are isomorphic. Показано, що якщо K — замкнена й обмежена пiдмножина рiманового многовиду M розмiрностi m > 3, а фрактальна розмiрнiсть K менша за m− 3, то фундаментальнi групи M i M −K є iзоморфними. 1. Introduction. If K is a subset of a connected topological space M, it is interesting (but usually hard) to study, relations between fundamental groups of M and M − K. When the difference of the fractal dimensions (box dimension or Hausdorff dimension) of K and M is big enough, we expect that the fundamental groups of M and M −K be isomorphic. It is proved in [1] that if M = Rm or M = Sm, m ≥ 2 and F is a compact subset of M and the Hausdorff dimension of F is strictly less than m − k − 1, then M − F is k-connected (i.e., its homotopy groups πi vanish for i ≤ k). Consequently if dimH(F ) < m − 2 then Rn − F and Sn − F are simply connected. In this paper, we consider a more general case when M is a Riemannian manifold then we prove the following theorem. Theorem 1.1. Let Mm be a Riemannian manifold of dimension m > 3, and K be a bounded and closed subset of M such that dimB(K) < m − 3. Then π1(M) is isomorphic to π1(M −K). Before giving the proof of the theorem, we mention some preliminaries. Let A be a subset of a metric space (M,d). We denote by dimA the topological dimension of A. Let ε be a positive number and put Bε(A) = { x ∈M : d(x, a) < ε for some a ∈ A } . If A is bounded then the upper box dimension of A is defined by dimBA = lim sup δ→0 log(mδA) − log δ , where, mδA is the maximum number of disjoint balls of radius δ, with centers contained in A. The lower box dimension dimB(A) is defined in similar way. Another definition for dimension, which is widely used in fractal geometry is Hausdorff dimension (see [2]). We use the upper box dimension in our theorem. But a similar result is true for lower box dimension and also for Hausdorff dimension. Remark 1.1. (a) If A is a submanifold of a Riemannian manifold M, then dimB(A) = dim(A). (b) If (M,d) and (N, d′) are metric spaces and f : M → N is a map such that for some positive number c > 0, d′(f(x), f(y)) ≤ cd(x, y) (f is Lipschitz), then c© R. MIRZAIE, 2011 854 ISSN 1027-3190. Укр. мат. журн., 2011, т. 63, № 6 ON FUNDAMENTAL GROUP OF RIEMANNIAN MANIFOLDS WITH OMITTED . . . 855 dimB(f(A)) ≤ dimB(A). (c) If A1 and A2 are bounded subsets of M, then dimB(A1 ×A2) ≤ dimB(A1) + dimB(A2). Remark 1.2. In the followings, for each positive number r, we denote by Sn−1(r) the sphere of radius r and center at the origin of Rn. Let D be a closed (n− 1)-disc in Rn and let a be a point outside of D. The set C = { ta+ (1− t)d : d ∈ D, 0 ≤ t ≤ 1 } is called a cone with vertex a, over D. The following map is called a radial projection f : C → D : f(ta+ (1− t)d) = d. If x1, x2 ∈ C and x1 → a, x2 → a then |x2−x1| → 0. Thus f is not Lipschitz (because |f(x1) − f(x2)| is bounded). But, if W is an open neighborhood of a in Rn, the map f : (C −W )→ D is a Lipschitz map. 2. Proof of Theorem 1.1. Step 1. Let 0 < r2 < r1, A(r1, r2) = { x ∈ Rn : r2 ≤ |x| ≤ r1 } , n > 2, and let K be a closed subset of A(r1, r2), such that dimB(K) < n− 1. Then there are points a1 ∈ Sn−1(r1) and a2 ∈ Sn−1(r2) such that the line segment a2a1, joining two points a1 and a2, does not intersect K. Proof. Since dimB(K) < n− 1, then Sn−1(r1)−K 6= ∅. Let a1 ∈ Sn−1(r1)−K and let o be the origin of Rn. Denote by oa1 the line segment joining o to a1. Put b = oa1 ∩ Sn−1(r2) and let c be the mid point of ob and consider the (n − 1)-disc D, with the center at c and boundary on Sn−1(r2), which is perpendicular to ob at the point c. Since K is closed, there is an open neighborhood W of a1, such that K ∩W = ∅. Let C be the cone over D with the vertex a1, and consider the radial projection map f : (C −W )→ D. f is a Lipschitz map. Thus dimB(f(K ∩ (C −W ))) ≤ dimB(K ∩ (C −W )) < n− 1. Thus, f(K ∩ (C −W )) does not cover D. If d ∈ (D− f((C −W )∩K)) then the line segment a1d does not intersect K. If a2 = a1d∩Sn−1(r2), then a1a2 is the desired line segment. Step 2. If K ⊂ Rn, n > 2, and dimB(K) < n − 1, then there is a path σ : [0, 1]→ Rn such that σ(0) = o and for each t ∈ (0, 1], σ(t) /∈ K. Proof. Consider the spheres Sn−1 ( 1 m ) , m ∈ N. Since dimB(K) < n − 1, then for each r > 0, Sn−1(r) − K 6= ∅. Let a1 ∈ (Sn−1(1) − K). By Step 1, there is point a2 ∈ Sn−1 ( 1 2 ) , such that a1a2 ∩ K = ∅. Let σ1 : [ 1 2 , 1 ] → Rn be a path from a2 to a1 along the line segment a2a1. Now, by induction, we can find the points am ∈ Sn−1 ( 1 m ) , m > 1, and the paths σm−1 : [ 1 m , 1 m− 1 ] → Rn, along the line segments amam−1, such that am−1am ∩K = ∅. The following path is the desired path σ : [0, 1]→ Rn, σ(0) = 0, and σ(t) = σm(t) if t ∈ [ 1 m , 1 m− 1 ] , m > 1. Let α, β : I = [0, 1]→ M be two continuous paths in M with the same end-points. We recall that a continuous map F : [0, 1] × [0, 1] → M with the following properties, ISSN 1027-3190. Укр. мат. журн., 2011, т. 63, № 6 856 R. MIRZAIE is called a homotopy equivalence between α and β F (s, 0) = α(s), F (s, 1) = β(s), s ∈ I, F (0, t) = α(0) = β(0), F (1, t) = α(1) = β(1), t ∈ I. Step 3. Let E be a closed and bounded subset of Rn, n > 3, such that dimB(E) < < n − 3. Let α, β : I → (Rn − E) be two loops at the point x0 ∈ (Rn − E) and F : I × I → Rn be a differentiable homotopy equivalence between α and β (in Rn). If ε > 0 then there is a homotopy equivalence G : I × I → (Rn − E) (homotopy equivalence in (Rn − E)) between α and β such that max { |F (s, t)−G(s, t)| : (s, t) ∈ I × I } < ε. Proof. Put N = F (I × I) and let φ : N ×Rn → Rn, φ(x, y) = y − x. Consider the following metric on N ×Rn: d((x1, y1), (x2, y2)) = |x1 − x2|+ |y1 − y2|. Put K = φ(N × E). φ is a Lipschitz map, so dimB(K) = dimBφ(N × E) ≤ dimB(N × E) ≤ ≤ dimB(N) + dimB(E) < 2 + n− 3 = n− 1. By Step 2, there is a path σ : [0, 1] → Rn, such that σ(0) = o and for each t ∈ (0, 1], σ(t) ∈ (Rn −K). Let θ : I × I → [0, 1] be a continuous function such that θ(s, t) = 0 if and only if (s, t) belongs to the boundary of I × I. Since σ is continuous, there is a δ > 0 such that |σ(δθ(s, t))| < ε, (s, t) ∈ I × I. Now, put G : I × I → Rn, G(s, t) = F (s, t) + σ(δθ(s, t)). We have G(s, 0) = F (s, 0) = α(s), G(s, 1) = F (s, 1) = β(s), s ∈ I, in similar way G(0, t) = G(1, t) = x0, t ∈ I. Thus, G is a homotopy equivalence between α and β. Also we obtain G(s, t) /∈ E, (s, t) ∈ I × I. Because, if G(s, t) ∈ E then (F (s, t), F (s, t) + σ(δθ(s, t)) ∈ N × E ⇒ (F (s, t) + σ(δ(θ(s, t)))− F (s, t)) ∈ K. Therefore, σ(δθ(s, t)) ∈ K, which is contradiction. This means that G : I × I → (Rn− − E) is a homotopy equivalence between α and β in (Rn − E). Also we have |G(s, t)− F (s, t)| = |σ(δθ(s, t))| < ε. ISSN 1027-3190. Укр. мат. журн., 2011, т. 63, № 6 ON FUNDAMENTAL GROUP OF RIEMANNIAN MANIFOLDS WITH OMITTED . . . 857 Step 4. Let U be an open subset of Rn, n > 3, E ⊂ U and dimB(E) < n − 3. Then π1(U) is isomorphic to π1(U − E). Proof. Let x0 ∈ (U −E) and for each loop α : I → (U −E) at x0, denote by [α]1 and [α]2 the elements of π1(U − E, x0) and π1(U, x0) generated by α. Put φ : π1(U − E)→ π1(U), φ([α]1) = [α]2. We show that φ is one to one and onto. Let [α]1, [β]1 ∈ π1(U −E). If [α]2 = [β]2 then there is a differentiable homotopy equivalence F : I × I → U between α and β in U. By Step 3, for each ε > 0, there is a homotopy equivalence G : I × I → (Rn − E) between α and β such that |G(s, t)− F (s, t)| < ε, (s, t) ∈ I × I. Since for each (s, t), F (s, t) ∈ U, we can choose ε sufficiently small, such that G(s, t) ∈ ∈ U (i.e., G(s, t) ∈ U − E). Thus G will be a homotopy equivalence between α and β in U − E. Then [α]1 = [β]1 and consequently φ is one to one. Now, we show that φ is onto. let [γ] ∈ π1(U, x0) and suppose that γ is a differen- tiable representative of [γ] and let L = {γ(t) : t ∈ [0, 1]}. Consider the following metric on L×Rn: d ( (x1, y1), (x2, y2) ) = |x1 − x2|+ |y1 − y2|. Put φ : L×Rn → Rn, φ(x, y) = y − x and let K = φ(L× E). φ is Lipschitz, so dimBK ≤ dimB(L× E) ≤ dimBL+ dimBE < 1 + n− 3 = n− 2. Thus, as like as the proof of Step 2, we can find a path σ : [0, 1] → Rn such that σ(0) = o and σ(t) /∈ K, t ∈ (0, 1]. Let θ : [0, 1]→ [0, 1] be a continuous function such that θ(s) = 0 if and only if s ∈ {0, 1}. For each ε > 0, there is a δ > 0 such that |σ(δθ(s))| < ε, s ∈ [0, 1]. Put α : [0, 1]→ Rn, α(s) = γ(s) + σ(δθ(s)) and let H(s, t) = γ(s) + σ(δtθ(s)). Sine for each s ∈ [0, 1], γ(s) ∈ U, we can choose the number ε, so small that α(s) ∈ U, H(s, t) ∈ U. Also we have α(s) /∈ E (because, if α(s) ∈ E then (γ(s), α(s)) ∈ L × E, so α(s) − − γ(s) ∈ K, then σ(δθ(s)) ∈ K, which is contradiction). Since H : I × I → U, is a homotopy equivalence between γ and α in U, we get that φ[α]1 = [α]2 = [γ]. Thus φ is onto. ISSN 1027-3190. Укр. мат. журн., 2011, т. 63, № 6 858 R. MIRZAIE Step 5. By Nash’s embedding theorem, Mm can be embedded in Rn for sufficiently large n. Consider the normal vector bundle M → TM⊥ : p → (TpM)⊥ over the submanifold M of Rn (i.e., TM⊥ = {(p, v) : p ∈ M, v ∈ TpM ⊥}). There exists a neighborhood U0 of the null section OM in (TM)⊥ such that the map exp (see [3] for definition of exp) is a diffeomorphism of U0 on to an open subset U ⊂ Rn (U is called a tubular neighborhood of M in Rn) exp: U0 → U, exp(p, v) = expp(v). The following map Ψ is a deformation retract of U0 on to OM : Ψ: U0 × I → U0, Ψ((p, v), t) = (p, (1− t)v). Thus, the following map is a deformation retract of U on to M (i.e., π1(M) is isomor- phic to π1(U)). Φ: U × I → U, Φ(x, t) = exp(Ψ(exp−1(x), t)). Consider the map ς : U →M defined by ς(x) = Φ(x, 1) and put K̂ = ς−1(K) . It easy to show that dimB(K̂) ≤ dimB(K) + (n−m) < (m− 3) + (n−m) < n− 3. Now, we can use Step 4, to get that π1(U) is isomorphic to π1(U − K̂). Since M is a deformation retract of U, it is easy to show that M − K is a deformation retract of U − K̂. Thus π1(U − K̂) is isomorphic to π1(M − K). Therefore, π1(M − K) is isomorphic to π1(M). 1. Matheus C., Olivera K. K. Geometrical versus topological properties of manifols // J. Inst. Math. Jusseiu. – 2005. – 4, № 4. – P. 639 – 651. 2. Falconer K. Fractal geometry: mathematical foundations. – New York: Jon Wiley and Sons, 1990. 3. Do Carmo M. P. Riemannian geometry. – Boston; Berlin, 1992. Received 13.11.10 ISSN 1027-3190. Укр. мат. журн., 2011, т. 63, № 6
id nasplib_isofts_kiev_ua-123456789-166254
institution Digital Library of Periodicals of National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine
issn 1027-3190
language English
last_indexed 2025-12-07T18:09:24Z
publishDate 2011
publisher Інститут математики НАН України
record_format dspace
spelling Mirzaie, R.
2020-02-18T15:57:05Z
2020-02-18T15:57:05Z
2011
On fundamental group of Riemannian manifolds with ommited fractal subsets / R. Mirzaie // Український математичний журнал. — 2011. — Т. 63, № 6. — С. 854–858. — Бібліогр.: 3 назв. — англ.
1027-3190
https://nasplib.isofts.kiev.ua/handle/123456789/166254
512.5
We show that if K is a closed and bounded subset of a Riemannian manifold M of dimension m>3, and the fractal dimension of K is less than m−3, then the fundamental groups of M and M−K are isomorphic.
Показано, що якщо K — замкнена й обмежена пiдмножина рiманового многовиду M розмiрностi m>3, а фрактальна розмiрнiсть K менша за m−3, то фундаментальнi групи M i M−K є iзоморфними.
en
Інститут математики НАН України
Український математичний журнал
Короткі повідомлення
On fundamental group of Riemannian manifolds with ommited fractal subsets
Про фундаментальну групу рiманових многовидiв з пропущеними фрактальними пiдмножинами
Article
published earlier
spellingShingle On fundamental group of Riemannian manifolds with ommited fractal subsets
Mirzaie, R.
Короткі повідомлення
title On fundamental group of Riemannian manifolds with ommited fractal subsets
title_alt Про фундаментальну групу рiманових многовидiв з пропущеними фрактальними пiдмножинами
title_full On fundamental group of Riemannian manifolds with ommited fractal subsets
title_fullStr On fundamental group of Riemannian manifolds with ommited fractal subsets
title_full_unstemmed On fundamental group of Riemannian manifolds with ommited fractal subsets
title_short On fundamental group of Riemannian manifolds with ommited fractal subsets
title_sort on fundamental group of riemannian manifolds with ommited fractal subsets
topic Короткі повідомлення
topic_facet Короткі повідомлення
url https://nasplib.isofts.kiev.ua/handle/123456789/166254
work_keys_str_mv AT mirzaier onfundamentalgroupofriemannianmanifoldswithommitedfractalsubsets
AT mirzaier profundamentalʹnugrupurimanovihmnogovidivzpropuŝenimifraktalʹnimipidmnožinami