Особенности реакции гибридов подсолнечника на температурный режим межфазных периодов

Особенности реакции гибридов подсолнечника на температурный режим межфазных периодов

Aims. The aim of investigation is to study the effect of a temperature regime on the duration of interphase periods and to reveal the possible parameters of hybrid temperature characteristic using a new breeding material. Methods. Field evaluation of sunflower hybrids carried out via a competitive t...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Date:2013
Main Authors: Макляк, Е.Н., Кириченко, В.В.
Format: Article
Language:Russian
Published: Інститут молекулярної біології і генетики НАН України 2013
Series:Фактори експериментальної еволюції організмів
Subjects:
Аналіз та оцінка генетичних ресурсів
Online Access:https://nasplib.isofts.kiev.ua/handle/123456789/177703
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Journal Title:Digital Library of Periodicals of National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine
Cite this:Особенности реакции гибридов подсолнечника на температурный режим межфазных периодов / Е.Н. Макляк, В.В. Кириченко // Фактори експериментальної еволюції організмів: Зб. наук. пр. — 2013. — Т. 13. — С. 72-76. — Бібліогр.: 13 назв. — рос.

Institution

Digital Library of Periodicals of National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine
id nasplib_isofts_kiev_ua-123456789-177703
record_format dspace
spelling nasplib_isofts_kiev_ua-123456789-1777032025-02-09T13:39:30Z Особенности реакции гибридов подсолнечника на температурный режим межфазных периодов Specifics of response of sunflower hybrids to interphase period temperature regime Макляк, Е.Н. Кириченко, В.В. Аналіз та оцінка генетичних ресурсів Aims. The aim of investigation is to study the effect of a temperature regime on the duration of interphase periods and to reveal the possible parameters of hybrid temperature characteristic using a new breeding material. Methods. Field evaluation of sunflower hybrids carried out via a competitive trial and determination of interphase period duration. Results. It has been revealed a negative correlation between the duration of interphase periods and temperature indicators. But some hybrids had their individual peculiarities. Hybrids possessed the low temperature threshold of the development have been selected. Conclusions. It has been recommended to use a low temperature threshold of a development and a correlation between a «flowering –physiological maturation» period duration and temperature indicator of periods. Key words: sunflower, hybrids, interphase periods, temperature. 2013 Article Особенности реакции гибридов подсолнечника на температурный режим межфазных периодов / Е.Н. Макляк, В.В. Кириченко // Фактори експериментальної еволюції організмів: Зб. наук. пр. — 2013. — Т. 13. — С. 72-76. — Бібліогр.: 13 назв. — рос. 2219-3782 https://nasplib.isofts.kiev.ua/handle/123456789/177703 ru Фактори експериментальної еволюції організмів application/pdf Інститут молекулярної біології і генетики НАН України
institution Digital Library of Periodicals of National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine
collection DSpace DC
language Russian
topic Аналіз та оцінка генетичних ресурсів
Аналіз та оцінка генетичних ресурсів
spellingShingle Аналіз та оцінка генетичних ресурсів
Аналіз та оцінка генетичних ресурсів
Макляк, Е.Н.
Кириченко, В.В.
Особенности реакции гибридов подсолнечника на температурный режим межфазных периодов
Фактори експериментальної еволюції організмів
description Aims. The aim of investigation is to study the effect of a temperature regime on the duration of interphase periods and to reveal the possible parameters of hybrid temperature characteristic using a new breeding material. Methods. Field evaluation of sunflower hybrids carried out via a competitive trial and determination of interphase period duration. Results. It has been revealed a negative correlation between the duration of interphase periods and temperature indicators. But some hybrids had their individual peculiarities. Hybrids possessed the low temperature threshold of the development have been selected. Conclusions. It has been recommended to use a low temperature threshold of a development and a correlation between a «flowering –physiological maturation» period duration and temperature indicator of periods. Key words: sunflower, hybrids, interphase periods, temperature.
format Article
author Макляк, Е.Н.
Кириченко, В.В.
author_facet Макляк, Е.Н.
Кириченко, В.В.
author_sort Макляк, Е.Н.
title Особенности реакции гибридов подсолнечника на температурный режим межфазных периодов
title_short Особенности реакции гибридов подсолнечника на температурный режим межфазных периодов
title_full Особенности реакции гибридов подсолнечника на температурный режим межфазных периодов
title_fullStr Особенности реакции гибридов подсолнечника на температурный режим межфазных периодов
title_full_unstemmed Особенности реакции гибридов подсолнечника на температурный режим межфазных периодов
title_sort особенности реакции гибридов подсолнечника на температурный режим межфазных периодов
publisher Інститут молекулярної біології і генетики НАН України
publishDate 2013
topic_facet Аналіз та оцінка генетичних ресурсів
url https://nasplib.isofts.kiev.ua/handle/123456789/177703
citation_txt Особенности реакции гибридов подсолнечника на температурный режим межфазных периодов / Е.Н. Макляк, В.В. Кириченко // Фактори експериментальної еволюції організмів: Зб. наук. пр. — 2013. — Т. 13. — С. 72-76. — Бібліогр.: 13 назв. — рос.
series Фактори експериментальної еволюції організмів
work_keys_str_mv AT maklâken osobennostireakciigibridovpodsolnečnikanatemperaturnyjrežimmežfaznyhperiodov
AT kiričenkovv osobennostireakciigibridovpodsolnečnikanatemperaturnyjrežimmežfaznyhperiodov
AT maklâken specificsofresponseofsunflowerhybridstointerphaseperiodtemperatureregime
AT kiričenkovv specificsofresponseofsunflowerhybridstointerphaseperiodtemperatureregime
first_indexed 2025-11-26T08:44:02Z
last_indexed 2025-11-26T08:44:02Z
_version_ 1849841831407255552
fulltext 72 / . . . – .: , 1971. – . 185–197. 17. Gage T.B., Wendei S.H. Quantitative determination of certain flavonol-3-glycosides // Analitical Chemistry. – 1950. – Vol. 22. – P. 708–711. 18. . . . – .: , 1974. – 250 . 19. . ., . ., . ., . ., . . - // - . – 1994. – .1 – . 117–119. LAPSHIN P.V., ZAGOSKINA N.V. Timiryazev Institute of Plant Physiology, Russian Academy of Sciences Russia, 127276, Moscow, Botanicheskaya str., 35, e-mail: p.lapshin@mail.ru CRASSULA AND THE CONTENT OF PHENOLIC COMPOUNDS Aims. One important area of biological research is to study the various representatives of the higher plants, including in relation to their possible use for the production of biologically active secondary metabolites. These include phenolic compounds successfully used in pharmacology and medicine. The aim of the study was to investigate the accumulation of phenolic compounds in chlorophyll-defectives and corresponding normal plants of the genus Crassula (Crassula L.). Methods. In the leaves of plants determined the content the amount of soluble phenolic compounds and flavonoids. Results. Determined that in the plant leaves of Crassula sarmentosa content of phenolic compounds and flavonoids were significantly higher than in plant leaves of Crassula ovate. Conclusions. Consider that the accumulation of these secondary metabolites is dependent on many factors, including genetic characteristics of plants. Key words: Crassula, phenolic compounds, flavonoids, genetic resources. . ., . . . . . , 61060, . , . , 142, e-mail: yuriev1908@gmail.com – - , - - [1]. - - , [2]. - - - . - , - [3], [4]. , , - [5]. - , , (« » ) - 5° 15–16° [6, 7]. , - , , - , - ( , ), 4° 10° [8, 9, 10]. - . 73 2005–2012 . 15 - . . . - : , , , , , , , , , , , - , , , - , . - , . . - [11] - . – 40 2, – , – 55 . . 1 . – - . : « – », « – », « – - ». – 50 % - . - – - . 2–5 . , . ( . 1), - . . 1. , ° , , 2005–2012 . : 1 – , 2 – , 3 – , 4 – , 5 – , 6 – , 7 – , 8 – , 9 – , 10 – , 11 – , 12 – , 13 – . . - - , (« - » ) - [12]. StatSoft Statistica 6.0 Microsoft Office Excel 2007. - « – - », « – - », , - , - - . - « – - » - –0,545 –0,842, « – » – – 0,410 – 0,887. , - , - « - – » - « – - ». « – - » (r = – 0,662 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 74 - , r = – 0,536 - , r = –0,621 - - ), (r = –0,742, r = –0,737, r = –0,661), (r = –0,535, r = –0,522, r = –0,477), (r = –0,571, r = –0,536, r = –0,576). - - - (« – », « - – »). - , - . « – » - « – »; - , - . , « – - » 1,5–1,7 - , « – ». , - - - ( ). , , . , - « – » 31- 2007 44- 2009 ; - 30 % - . - - - , [13]. - , , , . , ( - ) ( « – - »). , - « – » 5,0±2,3° , « – » 6,5±2,5° . , 13,4±1,2° 10,8±1,4° . « – » . 2. 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 " - ", . 0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 , ° y = 577,6292+4,9702*x 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 " - ", . 0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 , ° y = 248,7363+13,3896*x . 2. « – » - ( ) ( ), 2005–2012 . 75 . , 2 00 5– 20 12 . « – » « – » / - , . - - , ° , ° - - - , ° - , . - - , ° , ° - - - , ° 1 35 ,3 ±3 ,6 69 5, 2± 46 ,3 9, 1± 1, 0 37 4, 4 20 ,6 ±3 ,3 43 5, 4± 41 ,4 10 ,3 ±1 ,1 22 3, 3 2 35 ,4 ±3 ,6 69 8, 3± 49 , 5 9, 6± 1, 0 35 9, 1 20 ,6 ±3 ,1 43 6, 0± 35 ,5 9, 0± 1, 1 25 1, 1 3 39 ,0 ±4 ,5 70 9, 9± 55 ,7 7, 7± 1, 1 40 8, 5 17 ,8 ±3 ,2 44 3, 2± 34 ,8 6, 2± 1, 8 33 3, 5 4 35 ,9 ±3 ,6 71 0, 9± 51 ,1 10 ,4 ±1 ,0 33 6, 4 21 ,3 ±3 ,1 45 0, 2± 35 ,3 8, 5± 1, 1 26 9, 7 5 35 ,9 ±4 ,3 71 1, 6± 71 ,6 13 ,5 ±1 ,1 22 6, 4 21 ,0 ±3 ,6 44 5, 8± 43 ,5 10 ,1 ±1 ,1 23 4, 6 6 36 ,0 ±4 ,2 71 6, 2± 63 ,8 12 ,2 ±1 ,0 27 7, 3 21 ,3 ±3 ,3 45 2, 0± 40 ,9 10 ,1 ±1 ,1 23 7, 6 7 35 ,6 ±3 ,7 71 9, 9± 56 ,9 10 ,4 ±1 ,1 34 9, 7 22 ,6 ±2 ,8 43 3, 2± 80 ,8 8, 8± 3, 6 23 3, 7 8 36 ,3 ±3 ,4 72 2, 0± 51 ,9 10 ,4 ±1 ,0 34 3, 7 21 ,5 ±3 ,6 45 7, 0± 50 ,2 11 ,4 ±1 ,4 21 2, 5 9 37 ,8 ±4 ,5 75 4, 5± 65 ,0 11 ,8 ±0 ,9 30 8, 6 21 ,8 ±3 ,4 46 7, 1± 39 ,1 9, 7± 0, 9 25 6, 9 10 36 ,6 ±4 ,0 75 9, 7± 80 ,4 5, 0± 2, 3 57 7, 6 21 ,4 ±3 ,1 46 8, 2± 53 ,8 6, 5± 2, 5 33 0, 2 11 38 ,3 ±4 ,0 76 0, 9± 71 ,0 13 ,4 ±1 ,2 24 8, 7 21 ,9 ±3 ,3 47 2, 9± 47 ,4 10 ,8 ±1 ,4 23 5, 6 12 38 ,4 ±3 ,4 76 6, 9± 51 ,5 10 ,0 ±1 ,0 38 2, 4 22 ,1 ±3 ,3 47 7, 1± 42 ,4 10 ,2 ±1 ,2 25 1, 6 13 39 ,0 ±3 ,8 77 4, 7± 39 ,0 7, 8± 0, 7 47 0, 8 22 ,6 ±2 ,9 50 0, 0± 42 ,5 12 ,4 ±1 ,0 22 0, 6 14 39 ,1 ±4 ,3 78 1, 5± 58 ,2 10 ,8 ±0 ,9 36 0, 9 22 ,3 ±3 ,4 48 4, 3± 42 ,7 11 ,0 ±0 ,9 23 8, 4 15 39 ,1 ±3 ,8 78 5, 5± 63 ,4 12 ,0 ±1 ,1 31 6, 9 22 ,5 ±3 ,1 48 6, 8± 41 ,4 9, 5± 1, 3 27 3, 5 76 « – » « - – » - . « – - » - - . , - , . 1. Aiken R.M. Applying thermal time scales to sunflower development // Agron. J. – 2005. – 97. – . 746–754. 2. Craufurd P. Q. Climate change and the flowering time of annual crops / P. Q. Craufurd, T. R. Wheeler // Journal of Experimental Botany. – 2009. – Vol. 60, No. 9. – P. 2529–2539. 3. . . . – .: , 1973. – 344 . 4. . ., . ., . . - // . – 2012. – 5. – . 78–87. 5. . . // : ; . . . . . – .: , 1975. – . 29–37. 6. . . // . . – 1965. – . 146. – . 117–125. 7. . . : . . . . / . . – .: , 1964. – 24 . 8. Villalobos F.J., Ritchie J.T. The effect of temperature on leaf emergence rates of sunflower genotypes // Field Crops Research. – 1992. – Vol. 29, iss.1 – P. 37–46. 9. Seiler G.J. Influence of temperature on primary and lateral root growth of sunflower seedlings // Environmental and Experimental Botany. – 1998. – Vol. 40. – P. 135–146. 10. Sadras V.O., Hali A.J. Quantification of temperature, photoperiod and population effect on plant leaf area in sun- flower crop // Crop Res. J. – 1988. – Vol. 18. – P. 185–196. 11. . . . – .: , 1985. – 351 . 12. . . : . . - . – . : , 1957. – C. 5–18. 13. . . - // , : - ’ . - . . . . – .: , 2012. – . 3. – . 478– 483. MAKLYAK E. N., KYRYCHENKO V. V. Plant Production Institute nd.a. V.Ya. Yuriev of NAAN Ukraine, 61060, Kharkiv, Moskovskiy prospect, 142, e-mail: yuriev1908@gmail.com SPECIFICS OF RESPONSE OF SUNFLOWER HYBRIDS TO INTERPHASE PERIOD TEMPERATURE REGIME Aims. The aim of investigation is to study the effect of a temperature regime on the duration of interphase periods and to reveal the possible parameters of hybrid temperature characteristic using a new breeding ma- terial. Methods. Field evaluation of sunflower hybrids carried out via a competitive trial and determination of interphase period duration. Results. It has been revealed a negative correlation between the duration of inter- phase periods and temperature indicators. But some hybrids had their individual peculiarities. Hybrids pos- sessed the low temperature threshold of the development have been selected. Conclusions. It has been rec- ommended to use a low temperature threshold of a development and a correlation between a «flowering – physiological maturation» period duration and temperature indicator of periods. Key words: sunflower, hybrids, interphase periods, temperature.

Similar Items