Характеристика цегли княжої доби у працях В. А. Богусевича

• Опубліковано в: : Археологія і давня історія України
• Дата: 2022
• Автор: Махота, О.О.
• Формат: Стаття
• Мова: Українська
• Опубліковано: Інститут археології НАН України 2022
• Теми: Наш ювілей
• Онлайн доступ: https://nasplib.isofts.kiev.ua/handle/123456789/187623
• Назва журналу: Digital Library of Periodicals of National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine
• Цитувати: Характеристика цегли княжої доби у працях В. А. Богусевича / О.О. Махота // Археологія і давня історія України: Зб. наук. пр. — К.: ІА НАН України, 2022. — Вип. 2 (43). — С. 41-49. — Бібліогр.: 14 назв. — укр.

Стаття присвячена внеску В. Богусевича у
 вивчення цегли княжої доби з території Києва,
 Чернігова, Путивля, Остра та інших міст. Проаналізовано його праці присвячені архітектурно-археологічним дослідженням пам’яток України
 ХІ—ХІІІ ст. Виокремлено інформацію про параметри плінфи та деякі критерії, на які спирався
 дослідник для визначення датування цегли княжої доби. Volodymyr Bogusevych researched various monuments
 of archeology, art and architecture of the IX—
 XVII centuries. He can be attributed to the constellation
 of scholars who laid the necessary vectors for
 studying the laws of architecture of the Princely Age.
 The methods of architectural and archeological research
 developed by V. Bogusevych still helps scholars
 to study the monuments of stone architecture.
 V. Bogusevych made a significant contribution to
 the study of one of the main structural material of the
 palace and temple architecture — the plinth. Having
 started his academic path in this direction along
 with the most famous experts in plinth (M. Karger,
 P. Rappaport and M. Kholostenko), he developed his
 own method of dating bricks of the Princely Age. However,
 V. Bogusevych did not pay proper attention to
 the coverage of the signs by which he dated the plinth.
 Judging by the works of V. Bogusevych, most likely it
 was its size. Also there is a tendency in his works to
 date the bricks by presence of marks and end marks.
 He collected a large collection of branded plinths from
 Kyiv, Chernihiv, Ostra and Putivl and has repeatedly
 participated in discussions about the possible purpose
 of the signs.
 Analyzing the works of V. Bogusevych, we can conclude
 that he developed his terminological and conceptual
 apparatus in the study of plinth gradually. It
 was not until the 1950s that in his papers the word
 «plinth» appeared next to the word «brick» to denote
 this type of building material. This was influenced by
 joint work with professional architects Yu. Aseev and
 M. Kholostenko. After all, it is in joint work with them
 that the use of these terms can be traced.
 Of course, modern research methods have advanced
 significantly in the study of plinths and sometimes refute
 the conclusions of the scholar. But the source base
 of brick sizes and signs on it significantly influenced
 the development of modern methods of attribution of
 plinths and is an extremely valuable source for future
 generations of researchers of bricks of the Princely
 Age.