Намисто з могильника Острів (за матеріалами досліджень 2017—2020 рр.)

• Опубліковано в: : Археологія і давня історія України
• Дата: 2022
• Автор: Дяченко, Д.Г.
• Формат: Стаття
• Мова: Українська
• Опубліковано: Інститут археології НАН України 2022
• Теми: Публікація археологічних матеріалів
• Онлайн доступ: https://nasplib.isofts.kiev.ua/handle/123456789/187630
• Назва журналу: Digital Library of Periodicals of National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine
• Цитувати: Намисто з могильника Острів (за матеріалами досліджень 2017—2020 рр.) / Д.Г. Дяченко // Археологія і давня історія України: Зб. наук. пр. — К.: ІА НАН України, 2022. — Вип. 2 (43). — С. 134-150. — Бібліогр.: 50 назв. — укр.

Стаття присвячена намистам та їх елементам, виявленим в поховальних комплексах західнобалтського могильника Острів у 2017—2020 рр.
 Розглянуто типи й хронологію намистин, особливості намистяного набору. The presence of elements of the necklace sets among
 the grave goods is one of the characteristic features of
 the Ostriv burial ground. They were found in 21 graves
 from 83 excavated in the period of 2017—2020.
 In 19 cases they were part of the neck ornament.
 The necklace was an attribute of women’s costume in
 17 burials, which is slightly less than half of the total
 number of women’s burials. This indicates both social
 differentiation within the group and differences in
 costume composition. Mainly the necklace was found
 among the grave goods of girls and young women.
 In two cases one shell of Cypraea moneta was found
 in men’s burials indicating their use as buttons or talismans.
 In total, 546 elements of the necklace set were found
 in the burials. Most of the finds (51 %) represented by
 glass products, slightly less (45 %) by shells (Cypraea
 moneta is absolutely dominated), 3.8 % is non-ferrous
 metal products, one detected bead (0.2 %) is made of
 faience.
 The uneven distribution of elements in the necklace
 from one item to almost hundred is recorded. The
 number of beads of a certain type in the set could be
 large, even absolute, while others consisted of more different
 elements but could be inferior to the first one by
 total number of copies in the set.
 Significant predominance of beads with metal foil,
 blue ribbed and Cypraea moneta shells. These varieties
 together make up 69 % of all identified elements of the
 necklace set and were the most popular and available
 for necklace formation among these people.
 The marginality of other elements should indicate
 their secondary nature and addition to the main set
 if possible. However, in our opinion, in this case the
 situation is diametrically opposed. The most common
 types of elements — with metal foil and Cypraea
 moneta — have been obtained by the population in
 mass and added to existing vague sets or formed new
 ones.