Algebraic Morse theory and homological perturbation theory

We show that the main result of algebraic Morse theory can be obtained as a consequence of the perturbation lemma of Brown and Gugenheim.

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Algebra and Discrete Mathematics
Datum:2018
1. Verfasser: Sköldberg, E.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:English
Veröffentlicht: Інститут прикладної математики і механіки НАН України 2018
Online Zugang:https://nasplib.isofts.kiev.ua/handle/123456789/188379
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Назва журналу:Digital Library of Periodicals of National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine
Zitieren:Algebraic Morse theory and homological perturbation theory / E. Sköldberg // Algebra and Discrete Mathematics. — 2018. — Vol. 26, № 1. — С. 124–129. — Бібліогр.: 12 назв. — англ.

Institution

Digital Library of Periodicals of National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine
id nasplib_isofts_kiev_ua-123456789-188379
record_format dspace
spelling Sköldberg, E.
2023-02-26T12:33:18Z
2023-02-26T12:33:18Z
2018
Algebraic Morse theory and homological perturbation theory / E. Sköldberg // Algebra and Discrete Mathematics. — 2018. — Vol. 26, № 1. — С. 124–129. — Бібліогр.: 12 назв. — англ.
1726-3255
2010 MSC: Primary 18G35; Secondary 55U15.
https://nasplib.isofts.kiev.ua/handle/123456789/188379
We show that the main result of algebraic Morse theory can be obtained as a consequence of the perturbation lemma of Brown and Gugenheim.
en
Інститут прикладної математики і механіки НАН України
Algebra and Discrete Mathematics
Algebraic Morse theory and homological perturbation theory
Article
published earlier
institution Digital Library of Periodicals of National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine
collection DSpace DC
title Algebraic Morse theory and homological perturbation theory
spellingShingle Algebraic Morse theory and homological perturbation theory
Sköldberg, E.
title_short Algebraic Morse theory and homological perturbation theory
title_full Algebraic Morse theory and homological perturbation theory
title_fullStr Algebraic Morse theory and homological perturbation theory
title_full_unstemmed Algebraic Morse theory and homological perturbation theory
title_sort algebraic morse theory and homological perturbation theory
author Sköldberg, E.
author_facet Sköldberg, E.
publishDate 2018
language English
container_title Algebra and Discrete Mathematics
publisher Інститут прикладної математики і механіки НАН України
format Article
description We show that the main result of algebraic Morse theory can be obtained as a consequence of the perturbation lemma of Brown and Gugenheim.
issn 1726-3255
url https://nasplib.isofts.kiev.ua/handle/123456789/188379
citation_txt Algebraic Morse theory and homological perturbation theory / E. Sköldberg // Algebra and Discrete Mathematics. — 2018. — Vol. 26, № 1. — С. 124–129. — Бібліогр.: 12 назв. — англ.
work_keys_str_mv AT skoldberge algebraicmorsetheoryandhomologicalperturbationtheory
first_indexed 2025-11-24T06:53:04Z
last_indexed 2025-11-24T06:53:04Z
_version_ 1850843316799668224
fulltext “adm-n3” — 2018/10/23 — 15:17 — page 124 — #130 Algebra and Discrete Mathematics RESEARCH ARTICLE Volume 26 (2018). Number 1, pp. 124–129 c© Journal “Algebra and Discrete Mathematics” Algebraic Morse theory and homological perturbation theory Emil Sköldberg Communicated by V. Lyubashenko Abstract. We show that the main result of algebraic Morse theory can be obtained as a consequence of the perturbation lemma of Brown and Gugenheim. 1. Introduction Robin Forman introduced discrete Morse theory in [For98] as a com- binatorial adaptation of the classical Morse theory suited for studying the topology of CW-complexes. Its fundamental idea is also applicable in purely algebraical situations (see e.g. [Jon03], [Koz05], [JW09], [Skö06]). Homological perturbation theory on the other hand builds on the perturbation lemma [Bro65], [Gug72]. In addition to its applications in algebraic topology, it has also found uses in e.g. the study of group cohomology [Lam92], [Hue89], resolutions in commutative algebra [JLS02], as well as in operadic settings, [Ber14]. In this note we show how to derive the main result of algebraic Morse theory from the perturbation lemma. In related work, Berglund [Ber], has also treated connections between algebraic Morse theory and homological perturbation theory. 2010 MSC: Primary 18G35; Secondary 55U15. Key words and phrases: algebraic Morse theory, homological perturbation theory, Perturbation Lemma. “adm-n3” — 2018/10/23 — 15:17 — page 125 — #131 E. Sköldberg 125 2. Definitions We will briefly review the definitions of the main objects of study. A contraction is a diagram of chain complexes of (left or right) modules over a ring R D C g f h where f and g are chain maps and h is a degree 1 map satisfying the identities fg = 1, gf = 1 + dh+ hd and fh = 0, hg = 0, h2 = 0. A contraction is filtered if there is a bounded below exhaustive filtration on the complexes which is preserved by the maps f , g and h. A perturbation of a chain complex C is a map t : C → C of degree −1 such that (d+ t)2 = 0. Given a perturbation t on C, we let C t be the complex obtained by equipping C with the new differential d+ t. We can now state the perturbation lemma. Theorem 1 (Brown, Gugenheim). D C g f h and a filtration lowering perturbation t of C, the diagram D t′ C t g′ f ′ h′ where f ′ = f + fSh, g′ = g + hSg, h′ = h+ hSh, t′ = fSg and S = ∞ ∑ n=0 t(ht)n defines a contraction. “adm-n3” — 2018/10/23 — 15:17 — page 126 — #132 126 Algebraic Morse theory Let us next review some terminology of algebraic Morse theory. By a based complex of R-modules we mean a chain complex C of R-modules together with direct sum decompositions Cn = ⊕ α∈In Cα where {In} is a family of mutually disjoint index sets. For f : ⊕ nCn → ⊕ nCn a graded map, we write fβ,α for the component of f going from Cα to Cβ, and given a based complex C we construct a digraph G(C) with vertex set V = ⋃ n In and with a directed edge α → β whenever the component dβ,α is non-zero. A subset M of the edges of G(C) such that no vertex is incident to more than one edge of M is called a Morse matching if, for each edge α → β in M , the corresponding component dβ,α is an isomorphism, and furthermore there is a well founded partial order ≺ on each In such that γ ≺ α whenever there is a path α(n) → β → γ(n) in the graph G(C)M , which is the graph obtained from G(C) by reversing the edges from M . Given the matching M , we define the set M0 to be the vertices that are not incident to an arrow from M . For α and β vertices in G(C)M we can now consider all directed paths from α to β. For each such path γ, we get a map from Cα to Cβ by, for each edge σ → τ in γ which is not in M take the map dτ,σ, and for each edge σ → τ in γ which is the reverse of an edge in M take the map −d−1 σ,τ and composing them. Summing these maps over all paths from α to β defines the map Γβ,α : Cα → Cβ . 3. The main result From the based complex C with Cn = ⊕ α∈In Cα furnished with a Morse matching M , we define another based complex C̃ by letting it be isomorphic to C as a graded module, and defining the differential d̃ in C̃ as d̃(x) = { dβ,α(x), if α → β ∈ M, 0, otherwise; for x ∈ Cα. We also need a based complex coming from the vertices in M0, so we define C̃ M by C̃M n = ⊕ α∈In∩M0 Cα, d C̃M = 0, “adm-n3” — 2018/10/23 — 15:17 — page 127 — #133 E. Sköldberg 127 and maps f̃ : C̃ → C̃ M , g̃ : C̃M → C̃ and h̃ : C̃ → C̃[1] given by f̃(x) = { x, if α ∈ M0, 0, otherwise, g̃(x) = x, x ∈ Cα. h̃(x) = { −d−1 α,β(x), if β → α ∈ M, 0, otherwise; With this notation we can now formulate the following lemma. Lemma 1. The diagram C̃ M C̃ g̃ f̃ h̃ is a contraction. Proof. We first need to verify that f̃ and g̃ are chain maps, which is readily seen. Next we check the identities f̃ g̃ = 1, g̃f̃ = 1 + d̃h̃+ h̃d̃. The first one is obvious, and the second follows from the fact that for a basis element x ∈ Cα, d̃h̃(x) = −x if there is an edge β → α in M , and 0 otherwise; and similarly h̃d̃(x) = −x if there is an edge α → β in M , and 0 otherwise. The identities h̃g̃ = 0, f̃ h̃ = 0, h̃2 = 0 follow from that vertices in M0 are not incident to any edge in M (the first two) and that no vertex is incident to more than one edge in M (the third). Let us now define the perturbation t on C̃ as t = d− d̃, where d is the differential on C, so t(x) = ∑ α→β 6∈M dβ,α(x) for x ∈ Cα. This makes C̃ t and C isomorphic as based complexes. “adm-n3” — 2018/10/23 — 15:17 — page 128 — #134 128 Algebraic Morse theory Lemma 2. The diagram C M C g f h where, for x ∈ Cα with α ∈ In, dCM (x) = ∑ β∈M0∩In−1 Γβ,α(x), f(x) = ∑ β∈M0∩In Γβ,α(x), g(x) = ∑ β∈In Γβ,α(x), h(x) = ∑ β∈In+1 Γβ,α(x), is a filtered contraction. Proof. From Lemma 1 together with the fact that there are no infinite paths in G(C)M , the Morse graph of C, we can deduce that ht is locally nilpotent, and we can thus invoke the perturbation lemma. It is not so hard to see that the perturbed differential on C̃ M is given by d(x) = ∞ ∑ i=0 t(ht)i(x) = ∑ β∈M0∩In−1 Γβ,α(x) and the maps f , g and h by f(x) = ∞ ∑ i=0 f(ht)i(x) = ∑ β∈M0∩In Γβ,α(x) g(x) = ∞ ∑ i=0 g(ht)i(x) = ∑ β∈In Γβ,α(x) h(x) = ∞ ∑ i=0 (ht)ih(x) = ∑ β∈In+1 Γβ,α(x) where x ∈ Cα. The above result is also shown (without the use of the perturbation lemma) in [Ber] using a result from [JW09]. From the preceding lemma, the main result of algebraic Morse theory now follows. Theorem 2. Let C be a based complex with a Morse matching M , then there is a differential on the graded module ⊕ α∈M0 Cα such that the resulting complex is homotopy equivalent to C. “adm-n3” — 2018/10/23 — 15:17 — page 129 — #135 E. Sköldberg 129 References [Ber] Alexander Berglund, Algebraic discrete Morse theory II – extra algebraic structures, Preprint. [Ber14] Alexander Berglund, Homological perturbation theory for algebras over operads, Algebr. Geom. Topol. 14 (2014), no. 5, 2511–2548. [Bro65] R. Brown, The twisted Eilenberg-Zilber theorem, Simposio di Topologia (Messina, 1964), Edizioni Oderisi, Gubbio, 1965, pp. 33–37. [For98] Robin Forman, Morse theory for cell complexes, Adv. Math. 134 (1998), no. 1, 90–145. [Gug72] V. K. A. M. Gugenheim, On the chain-complex of a fibration, Illinois J. Math. 16 (1972), 398–414. [Hue89] Johannes Huebschmann, Perturbation theory and free resolutions for nilpotent groups of class 2, J. Algebra 126 (1989), no. 2, 348–399. [JLS02] Leif Johansson, Larry Lambe, and Emil Sköldberg, On constructing resolutions over the polynomial algebra, Homology Homotopy Appl. 4 (2002), no. 2, part 2, 315–336, The Roos Festschrift volume, 2. [Jon03] Jakob Jonsson, On the topology of simplicial complexes related to 3-connected and Hamiltonian graphs, J. Combin. Theory Ser. A 104 (2003), no. 1, 169–199. [JW09] Michael Jöllenbeck and Volkmar Welker, Minimal resolutions via algebraic discrete Morse theory, Mem. Amer. Math. Soc. 197 (2009), no. 923, vi+74. [Koz05] Dmitry N. Kozlov, Discrete Morse theory for free chain complexes, C. R. Math. Acad. Sci. Paris 340 (2005), no. 12, 867–872. [Lam92] Larry A. Lambe, Homological perturbation theory, Hochschild homology, and formal groups, Deformation theory and quantum groups with applications to mathematical physics (Amherst, MA, 1990), Amer. Math. Soc., Providence, RI, 1992, pp. 183–218. [Skö06] Emil Sköldberg, Morse theory from an algebraic viewpoint, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 358 (2006), no. 1, 115–129 (electronic). Contact information E. Sköldberg School of Mathematics, Statistics and Applied Mathematics, National University of Ireland, Galway, Ireland E-Mail(s): emil.skoldberg@nuigalway.ie Web-page(s): http://www.maths.nuigalway.ie/ ∼emil/ Received by the editors: 23.09.2016.