Study of O(6) symmetry in ¹⁰⁸’¹¹⁰’¹¹²Ru isotopes by IBM-1 calculation

Interacting Boson Model (IBM-1) is very important for the low-lying combined state in even mass nuclei. We have described the O(6) limit in the ¹⁰⁸’¹¹⁰’¹¹²Ru nuclei by IBM-1 model. The B(E2) strength and energy levels in different bands were established in good agreement theoretically and experiment...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Problems of Atomic Science and Technology
Date:2023
Main Authors: Hossain, I., Kassim, H.H., Al-Jubbori, M.A., Saleh, A., Viswanathan, K.K., Salam, A., Sharrad, F.I.
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Національний науковий центр «Харківський фізико-технічний інститут» НАН України 2023
Subjects:
Online Access:https://nasplib.isofts.kiev.ua/handle/123456789/196145
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Journal Title:Digital Library of Periodicals of National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine
Cite this:Study of O(6) symmetry in ¹⁰⁸’¹¹⁰’¹¹²Ru isotopes by IBM-1 calculation / I. Hossain, H.H. Kassim, M.A. Al-Jubbori, A. Saleh, K.K. Viswanathan, A. Salam, F.I. Sharrad // Problems of Atomic Science and Technology. — 2023. — № 3. — С. 79-83. — Бібліогр.: 20 назв. — англ.

Institution

Digital Library of Periodicals of National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine
_version_ 1860059196811116544
author Hossain, I.
Kassim, H.H.
Al-Jubbori, M.A.
Saleh, A.
Viswanathan, K.K.
Salam, A.
Sharrad, F.I.
author_facet Hossain, I.
Kassim, H.H.
Al-Jubbori, M.A.
Saleh, A.
Viswanathan, K.K.
Salam, A.
Sharrad, F.I.
citation_txt Study of O(6) symmetry in ¹⁰⁸’¹¹⁰’¹¹²Ru isotopes by IBM-1 calculation / I. Hossain, H.H. Kassim, M.A. Al-Jubbori, A. Saleh, K.K. Viswanathan, A. Salam, F.I. Sharrad // Problems of Atomic Science and Technology. — 2023. — № 3. — С. 79-83. — Бібліогр.: 20 назв. — англ.
collection DSpace DC
container_title Problems of Atomic Science and Technology
description Interacting Boson Model (IBM-1) is very important for the low-lying combined state in even mass nuclei. We have described the O(6) limit in the ¹⁰⁸’¹¹⁰’¹¹²Ru nuclei by IBM-1 model. The B(E2) strength and energy levels in different bands were established in good agreement theoretically and experimentally. The calculated potential energy surfaces (PES) of those nuclei were suggested O(6) characters. Модель взаємодіючих бозонів (IBM-1) дуже важлива для низькорозташованого комбінованого станa в ядрах рівної маси. Ми описали межу O(6) в ядрах ¹⁰⁸’¹¹⁰’¹¹²Ru за моделлю IBM-1. Сила B(E2) і рівні енергії в різних діапазонах були встановлені в хорошому узгодженні теоретично і експериментально. Розраховані поверхні потенціальної енергії (PES) цих ядер були запропоновані O(6) характеру.
first_indexed 2025-12-07T17:02:59Z
format Article
fulltext ISSN 1562-6016. Problems of Atomic Science and Technology. 2023. №3(145) 79 https://doi.org/10.46813/2023-145-079 STUDY OF O(6) SYMMETRY IN 108,110,112 Ru ISOTOPES BY IBM-1 CALCULATION I. Hossain 1* , Huda H. Kassim 2 , Mushtaq A. Al-Jubbori 3 , Ahmed Saleh 4 , K.K. Viswanathan 5 , A. Salam 6 , Fadhil I. Sharrad 2,7 1 Department of Physics, Rabigh college of Science & Arts, King Abdulaziz University, 21911 Rabigh, Saudi Arabia; 2 Department of Physics, College of Science, Kerbala University, 56001 Karbala, Iraq; 3 Department of Physics, College of Education for Pure Science, University of Mosul, 41001 Mosul, Iraq; 4 Department of Radiotherapy and Nuclear Medicine, South Egypt Cancer Institute, Assiut University, Assiut, Egypt; 5 Department of Mathematical Modelling, Faculty of Mathematics, Samarkand State University, 15, University Boulevard, Samarkand, 140104, Uzbekistan; 6 Department of chemistry, Rabigh college of Science & Arts, King Abdulaziz University, 21911 Rabigh, Saudi Arabia; 7 College of Health and Medical Technology, Alkafeel University, 61001 An Najaf, Iraq * E-mail: mihossain@kau.edu.sa Interacting Boson Model (IBM-1) is very important for the low-lying combined state in even mass nuclei. We have described the O(6) limit in the 108,110,112 Ru nuclei by IBM-1 model. The B(E2) strength and energy levels in different bands were established in good agreement theoretically and experimentally. The calculated potential ener- gy surfaces (PES) of those nuclei were suggested O(6) characters. PACS: 23.20.-g INTRODUCTION Interacting Boson Model (IBM-1) is useful in ex- plaining the collective nuclear states of even-even nu- clei. The IBM-1 is established by a fixed number of bosons (Nb). The neutrons and protons have not been differentiated in IBM-1. The nuclear structure is com- plicated because each nucleon interacts with every other nucleon. Iachello and Arima [1] fruitfully designated the collective nuclear characters in intermediate mass nuclei using a system of bosons. Depending on its angular momentum L, each boson can occupy one of two levels: s-boson or d-boson. Moreover, this model had generated the algebra U(6) group: O(6), SU(3) and U(5). Never- theless, some scientists proposed the construction which consists of SU(3)–O(6), U(5)–SU(3) and U(5)– O(6) transitional [4, 5]. The electromagnetic strength, yrast levels and poten- tial energy surface of Ru isotopes were discussed by several researchers [6‒11]. Hossain et al. [12, 13] stud- ied O(6) symmetry of the nuclear structure of 104,106 Ru by IBM-1 calculation. Sharrad et al. [14] studied the U(5) symmetry of 96 Ru and 98 Ru nuclei using the inter- acting boson model (IBM-1). Luo Y. X. et al. [15] stud- ied Odd-parity bands of 108 Ru, , 110 Ru and , 112 Ru iso- topes. For this it is interesting to study the even-parity of the ground state band of more neutron-rich nuclei of Ru (A = 108, 110, 112) by IBM-1 calculation. This model signifies a vital stage to comprehend the structure of those nuclei. The even 108,110,112 Ru isotopes consist of Z = 44 pro- tons and neutrons N= 64, 66, 68 respectively which fill the orbits near a double shell closure 100 Sn. The configu- rations of 108,110,112 Ru isotopes have g 6 2/9  (6 holes of protons) and g 18,16,14 2/9 (14, 16, and 18 neutrons particle) near to 100 Sn. It is generally believed that the nuclei far from a close shell indicate structure from spherical to deformed symmetry. These neutrons rich deformed nu- clei will be an excellent topic of interest to be studied further. 1. METHODOLOGY The nuclei comprising N nucleons, the IBM model allocates to occupy a truncated model space. It is re- sponsible for a numerical clarification of indistinguisha- ble elements through L = 0 or 2 forming pairs. The equation of Hamiltonian in IBM-1 is shown as follow equation: 0 1 2 3 3 3 4 3 4 4 ˆ ˆˆ ˆ ˆ ˆ ˆˆ ˆ ˆ ˆ ˆ . dH n a P P a L L a Q Q a T T a a T T            (1) The equations of three types of symmetry are given as follows: U(5): 1 3 1 4 4 3 ( , , ) ( 4) 12 3 ( 3) 7 10 70 1 ( ) ( 1). 14 d d d d a E n L n n n a a a a a L L                    (2) 80 ISSN 1562-6016. Problems of Atomic Science and Technology. 2023. №3(145) SU(3): 2 22 2 1 ( , , ) ( 3( )) 2 2 ( 1). 8 a E L a a L L                    (3) O(6): 0 3 3 1 ( , , ) ( )( 4) 4 ( 3) ( 1). 2 10 a E L N N a a a L L                     (4) The Hamiltonian and eigen-values for the three lim- its are [16], U(5): (5) 1 3 3 3 4 4 4 ˆ ˆ ˆ ˆ ˆˆ ( ) ( ) ˆ ˆ( ), U dH n a L L a T T a T T        1 4 5 ( , , ) ( 4) ( 3) ( 1), d d d dE n L n K n n K K L L            (5) with 1 1 4 1 3 4 5 3 4 1 1 1 3 , , 12 10 7 70 1 1 . 14 14 K a K a a a K a a         O(6): , 3 4 5 ( , , ) [ ( 4) ( 4)] ( 3) ( 1), E L K N N K K L L               (6) with 3 0 4 3 5 3 4 1 1 1 , , . 4 2 10 K a K a K a a     SU(3): (3) 1 2 ˆ ˆˆ ˆ ˆ( ) ( ),UH a L L a Q Q    2 2 2 5 ( , , ) ( 3( )) ( 1), E L K K L L              (7) with 2 2 5 1 2 1 3 , . 2 8 K a K a a   2. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION Using IBM-1 model the results of different types of energy band, strength of reduced transition probabilities and potential energy surfaces (PES) of 108, 110, 112 Ru nu- clei are explained as follows: 2.1. ENERGY BAND The energy band consists of ground state (G.S.), gamma and beta band. These are used for the phenome- nological interaction boson model (IBM-1) to describe experiential data of 108,110,112 Ru nuclei. 2.1.1.  SYMMETRY AND BOSON NUMBER The  symmetry is realistic for those nuclei by means of available statistics of energy level (E2 : E4: E6 : E8 = 1.0 : 2.74 : 5.12 : 8.02) [17‒19]. According to dou- ble shell closure of 100 Sn, the Ru isotopes with N= 64 and 66, have 3 holes of proton boson and 7 and 8 parti- cles of neutron boson respectively. The 112 Ru nucleus has 3 hole of proton boson and 7 holes of neutron boson according to shell closure 132 Si. Therefore total bosons numbers are 10, 11, and 10 of 108 Ru and 110 Ru and 112 Ru respectively. Usually three symmetry U(5), O(6) and SU(3) depends on / ≈ 2.00, 2.50 and 3.33 respectively [17‒19]. Here E2  1 and E4  1 are at energy level 2  1 and 4  1 respectively. The experimental R4/2 of 108 Ru, 110 Ru and 112 Ru isotopes are 2.75, 2.75 and 2.73 respectively which characterized by a non-spherical spatial distribution of nuclear density and are known as deformed nuclei gamma soft O(6). Table 1 Adopted values for the parameters used for IBM-1 calculations. All parameters are given in MeV, excepted N, and CHQ=0, a2=0, a4=0 a3 a1 a0 N A 0.130 0.010 0.088 10 108 Ru 0.109 0.015 0.094 11 110 Ru 0.092 0.018 0.093 10 112 Ru The adopted values of parameters were determined by the equation (4) using the investigational eigen val- ues E(nd, , L), where nd,  and L are quantum num- bers. The finest fit was occupied up to 12 + of Ru iso- topes for the neutron N= 64, 66 and 68. Table 1 show all parameters (a0, a1, a2a3, a4) are given in MeV. 2.1.2. GROUND STATE BAND The excitation energy up to 12 + spins of ground state band of 108,110,112 Ru [17–19] nuclei are presented in Fig.1. The 0 + , 2 + , 4 + ,6 + , 8 + , 10 + and 12 + members of the ground state band of 108 Ru occur at 0, 0.242, 0.665, 1.241, 1.942, 2.741 and 3.529 MeV respectively and their corresponding value of IBM-1 are 0.0, 0.244, 0.596, 1.057, 1.626, 2.303, and 3.089 MeV. The meas- ured values of g-band (0 + ,2 + ,4 + ,6 + ,8 + ,10 + ,12 + ) of 110 Ru and 112 Ru are 0.0, 0.241, 0.664, 1.239, 1.945, 2.759 and 3.647 MeV and 0.0, 0.237, 0.645, 1.189, 1.839, 2.56 and 3.326 MeV respectively. The corresponding theo- retical calculation of IBM-1 in 110 Ru and 112 Ru are 0.0, 0.241, 0.619, 1.137, 1.792, 2.586 and 3.518 MeV and 0.0 0.236, 0.634, 1.192, 1.911, 2.792 and 3.834 MeV respectively. It is shown that theoretical and empirical data establish good agreement and the 108 Ru and 110 Ru and 112 Ru nuclei are good contenders for O(6) sym- metry. 0 1 3(6) 3 3. . .OH P P L L T Ta a a           ISSN 1562-6016. Problems of Atomic Science and Technology. 2023. №3(145) 81 Fig. 1. Ground state (G.S.) band of 108 Ru, 110 Ru and 112 Ru isotopes.IBM-1 and Expt data are indicated by black and red color respectively Fig. 2. Gamma band of 108 Ru, 110 Ru and 112 Ru isotopes. IBM-1 and Expt data are indicated by black and red color respectively 2.1.3. GAMMA BANDS The excitation of γ-bands (2 + , 3 + , 4 + ….9 + ) is favora- ble when the potential energy surfaces are found soft for both beta and gamma deformation parameters. The  bands usually observed at nuclear chart associated with ellipsoidal nuclear shape. The  bands were observed up to 9 + (2.844 MeV) in 108 Ru [17], 9 + (2.777 MeV) in 110 Ru [18] and 8 + (2.263 MeV) levels in 112 Ru [19]. The calculated excitation energy in MeV from 2 + to 9 + for gamma bands is compared with previous experimental data and they are plotted in Fig. 2. From the figures it is shown that gamma band of all IBM calculations of those nuclei are in good agreements with available pre- vious measured data [17–19]. 2.1.4. BETA BANDS The measured members of the beta-vibrational band observed at 0 + (0.976 MeV), 2 + (1.249 MeV), 4 + (1.644 MeV) and 10 + (3.149 MeV) in 108 Ru [17] and 0 + (1.137 MeV) , 2 + (1.396 MeV), 4 + ( 1.618 MeV) in 110 Ru [18]. There is no measured member of beta band in 112 Ru. The IBM-1 calculation of  bands are present- ed in Table 2. The excitations energy in MeV for beta bands (0 + , 2 + , 4 + ….10 + ) is compared with available pre- vious experimental data. It is shown that beta band of all IBM calculations of those nuclei are in good agreements with the available previous measured data [17–19]. Table 2 -band (in MeV) J π 108 Ru 110 Ru 112 Ru IBM Exp. IBM Exp. IBM Exp. 0+ 0.976 0.976 0.986 1.137 0.831 ‒ 2+ 1.219 1.249 1.480 1.396 1.261 ‒ 4+ 1.572 1.644 1.605 1.618 1.464 ‒ 6+ 2.032 ‒ 2.341 ‒ 2.207 ‒ 8+ 2.601 ‒ 3.032 ‒ 2.937 ‒ 10+ 3.279 3.150 3.826 ‒ 3.817 ‒ 2.2. B (E2) STRENGTHS The B(E2) strength provides the additional posses- sions of the construction of nuclei. It is known that the bosons numbers must be conversed if electric quadruple transition E2 operator should be a Hermitian tensor of rank two. The B(E2) strength of 108, 110, 112 Ru in IBM-1 [17–19] is calculated: 2 † † (2) † (2) 2 2 ˆ[ ] [ ]E BT d s s d d d e Q     . (8) The symbol (s † , d † ) is creation and (s, d) is annihilation operators for s and d bosons, respectively, although α2 and symbols are two parameters. α2 = effective charge of boson. and 2 21 ( 2, ) 2 1 E i f f i i B E J J J T J J    . (9) The parameters, α2 and β2 of Eq. (8), accommodated suitably a set to produce the published B(E2; ). The calculated effective charge (eB) of those nuclei is given in Table 3. Table 3 Effective charge used to reproduced B(E2) values for even-even 108-112 Ru nuclei Isotopes N eB (eb) 108 Ru 10 0.082 110 Ru 11 0.079 112 Ru 10 0.092 Table 4 Experimental and the IBM-1 values of B(E2) for 108,110,112 Ru nuclei in e 2 b 2 J  i -J  f 108Ru 110Ru 112Ru Exp IBM Exp IBM Exp. IBM   11 02 0.237 0.237 0.207 0.207 0.189 0.189   11 24 ‒ 0.327 0.269 0.286 0.287 0.261   22 24 ‒ 0.189 ‒ 0.167 ‒ 0.151   11 46 ‒ 0.362 0.376 0.319 ‒ 0.289   22 46 ‒ 0.250 ‒ 0.224 ‒ 0.199   11 68 ‒ 0.367 ‒ 0.328 ‒ 0.293   11 810 ‒ 0.352 ‒ 0.320 ‒ 0.281   22 810 ‒ 0.259 ‒ 0.243 ‒ 0.207   12 22 ‒ 0.327 ‒ 0.286 ‒ 0.261   12 44 ‒ 0.172 ‒ 0.152 ‒ 0.137   12 66 ‒ 0.117 ‒ 0.104 ‒ 0.093   12 88 ‒ 0.085 ‒ 0.077 ‒ 0.067 The values of eB in unit of eb were estimated to re- produce experimentally (B(E2; ). The 108,110 Ru 82 ISSN 1562-6016. Problems of Atomic Science and Technology. 2023. №3(145) and 112 Ru isotopes have O(6) character and the values β2= 0. The calculated and measured strength of B(E2) in e 2 b 2 for those isotopes are shown in Table 4. We have normalized the experimental and theoretical data using B(E2: ) states in each nuclei and then corre- sponding value up to B(E2:   12 88 ) are given in the Table 4. The present data of IBM-1 is good with the obtainable published measured results. 2.3. POTENTIAL ENERGY SURFACE (PES) The potential energy surface (PES) stretches the evi- dence for invention microscopic and geometric shapes of nuclei. The IBM-1 energy surface is created by com- bining the IBM-1 Hamiltonian’s expectation value with the coherent state ( ⟩ [20]. The creation opera- tors ( ) act on a state of boson vacuum | ⟩ to produce the coherent state as follows: †1 , , ( ) 0N cN b N    , (10) where   † † † 0 2 † † 2 2 1 [cos ( ) 1 1 sin ( )] . 2 cb s d d d           (11) The EPS can be written in terms of β and γ as 2 4 12 2 3 2 2 3 4 ( 1) ( , , ) [ (1 ) (1 ) cos3 ]. dN N N E N                       (12) The shape of a nucleus could be spherical or distort- ed depending on whether β=0 or not. The variation in nucleus symmetry is represented by γ term, when γ = 0, the nucleus has a prolate shape; when γ=60, it has an oblate shape. The plot of EPS of even even 108-112 Ru O(6) Symmetry are shown in Fig. 3. Fig. 3. Map of potential energy surfaces (N,, in MeV) of 108,110,112 Ru nuclei 3. CONCLUSIONS We have used the phenomenological Interaction Boson Model, IBM-1 to describe the experimental data for the energies and transition probabilities B(E2) in the 108 Ru, 110 Ru and 112 Ru nuclei. The yrast band, gamma band, beta band, electromagnetic transition and potential energy surface of those nuclei have been calculated in term of O(6) limit of IBM-1. The parameters for excita- tion up to energy 3.8 MeV of those isotopes were estab- lished using Hamiltonian of IBM-1. The results of cal- culation were in acceptable arrangement with the inves- tigational data. It is established that interacting boson approximations for those isotopes are suitable to de- scribe the gamma soft O(6) symmetry. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Authors are grateful to the authority of DSR for technical and financial support at King Abdulaziz Uni- versity, Jeddah. The authors are very grateful to the Col- lege of Health and Medical Technology, Alkafeel Uni- ISSN 1562-6016. Problems of Atomic Science and Technology. 2023. №3(145) 83 versity and University of Mosul/College of Education for Pure Science for their provided facilities, which helped to improve the quality of this work. REFERENCES 1. A. Aritma, F. Iachello. The interacting boson model. Cambridge Univ. press, Cambridge, 1987. 2. G.L. Long, S.J. Zhu, and H.Z. Sun. Description of 116,118,120 Cd in the interacting boson model // J. Phys. G Nucl. Part. Phys. 1995, v. 21, p. 331-338. 3. F. Iachello. Analytic description of critical point nuclei in a spherical- axially deformed shape phase transition // Phys. Rev. Lett. 2001, v. 87, p. 052502. 4. P. Cejnar, J. Jolie, and R.F. Casten. Spectral fluctua- tions in the interacting boson model // Rev. Mod. Phys. 2010, v. 82, p. 2155-2212. 5. R.F. Casten and E.A. Mccutchan. Quantum phase transitions and structural evolution in nuclei // J. Phys. G Nucl. Part. Phys. 2007, v. 34, p. R285- R320. 6. D. Troltenier et al. Shape transitions and shape coex- istence in the Ru and Hg chains // Z. Phys. A Had- rons and Nucl. 1991, v. 338, p. 261-270. 7. A. Frank, P. Van Isacker, D.D. Warner // Phys. Lett. B 1987,v. 97, p. 474-478. 8. R.F. Casten and D.D. Warner. The interacting Boson approximation // Rev. Mod. Phys. 1988, v. 60, p. 389-469. 9. X.L. Che et al. High Spin Band Structure in 112 Ru // Chin. Phys. lett. 2004, v. 21, p. 1904. 10. X.L. Che et al. Collective Band Structures in the Neutron-Rich 107,109 Ru Nuclei // Chin. Phys. lett. 2006, v. 23, p. 328. 11. J. Kotila, J. Suhonen, and D.S. Delion. Low-lying collective states in 98-106 Ru isotopes studied using a microscopic anharmonic vibrator approach // Phys. Rev. C. 2003, v. 68, p. 054322. 12. I. Hossain, I.M. Ahmed, F.I. Sharrad, H.Y. Abdul- lah. Yrast states and B(E2) values of even 100-102 Ru isotopes using Interacting Boson Model (IBM-1) // Chiang Mai J. Sci. 2015, v. 42(4), p. 996-1004. 13. I. Hossain, H.H. Kassim, M.A. Al-Jubbor, F.I. Shar- rad, S.A. Mansour. Ground states structure of Ru- thenium isotopes with neutron N = 60,62 // World J. Nucl. Sci. and Tech. (WJNST). 2020, v. 10, p. 76-84. 14. F.I. Sharrad, I. Hossain, I.M. Ahmed, H.Y. Abdul- lah, S.T. Ahmad, A.S. Ahmed. U(5) symmetry of even 96,98 Ru isotopes under the framework of Inter- acting boson model (IBM-1) // Braz. J. Phys. 2015, v. 45, p. 340-346. 15. Y. X. Luo et al. Odd-parity bands of 108, 110, 112 Ru // Int. J. Mod. Phys. E. 2009, v. 18, p. 1697-1716. 16. P.V. Isacker. The interacting Boson Model, Nuclear structure and decay data // Theory and evaluation workshop, Trieste-Italy, 2005, 04-15 April. 17. J. Blachot. Nucl. Data Sheets for A = 108 // Nucl. Data sheets. 1997, v. 81, p. 599. 18. G. Gurdal and F.G. Kondev. Nucl. Data sheets for A = 110 // Nucl. Data sheets. 2012, v. 79, p. 639. 19. F.G. Lalkovski, F.G. Kondev. Nucl. Data Sheets for A = 112 // Nucl. Data sheets. 2015, v. 124, p. 157. 20. L.M. Robledo et al. Role of triaxiality in the ground- state shape of neutron-rich Yb, Hf, W, Os and Pt iso- topes // J. Phys. G: Nucl. Part. Phys. 2009, v. 36, p. 115104. Article received 04.03.2023 ДОСЛІДЖЕННЯ СИМЕТРІЇ O(6) В ІЗОТОПАХ 108,110,112 Ru ЗА РОЗРАХУНКОМ IBM-1 I. Hossain, Huda H. Kassim, Mushtaq A. Al-Jubbori, Ahmed Saleh, K.K. Вішванатан, А. Салам, Фадхіл І. Шаррад Модель взаємодіючих бозонів (IBM-1) дуже важлива для низькорозташованого комбінованого станa в ядрах рівної маси. Ми описали межу O(6) в ядрах 108,110,112 Ru за моделлю IBM-1. Сила B(E2) і рівні енергії в різних діапазонах були встановлені в хорошому узгодженні теоретично і експериментально. Розраховані поверхні потенціальної енергії (PES) цих ядер були запропоновані O(6) характеру. http://hepnp.ihep.ac.cn/article/app/id/208a510e-33d0-47c5-8c94-d4f606ef48ed/reference http://hepnp.ihep.ac.cn/article/app/id/208a510e-33d0-47c5-8c94-d4f606ef48ed/reference https://scholar.google.com/citations?view_op=view_citation&hl=en&user=mnX9kF8AAAAJ&citation_for_view=mnX9kF8AAAAJ:HDshCWvjkbEC https://scholar.google.com/citations?view_op=view_citation&hl=en&user=mnX9kF8AAAAJ&citation_for_view=mnX9kF8AAAAJ:HDshCWvjkbEC
id nasplib_isofts_kiev_ua-123456789-196145
institution Digital Library of Periodicals of National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine
issn 1562-6016
language English
last_indexed 2025-12-07T17:02:59Z
publishDate 2023
publisher Національний науковий центр «Харківський фізико-технічний інститут» НАН України
record_format dspace
spelling Hossain, I.
Kassim, H.H.
Al-Jubbori, M.A.
Saleh, A.
Viswanathan, K.K.
Salam, A.
Sharrad, F.I.
2023-12-10T16:55:30Z
2023-12-10T16:55:30Z
2023
Study of O(6) symmetry in ¹⁰⁸’¹¹⁰’¹¹²Ru isotopes by IBM-1 calculation / I. Hossain, H.H. Kassim, M.A. Al-Jubbori, A. Saleh, K.K. Viswanathan, A. Salam, F.I. Sharrad // Problems of Atomic Science and Technology. — 2023. — № 3. — С. 79-83. — Бібліогр.: 20 назв. — англ.
1562-6016
PACS: 23.20.-g
DOI: https://doi.org/10.46813/2023-145-079
https://nasplib.isofts.kiev.ua/handle/123456789/196145
Interacting Boson Model (IBM-1) is very important for the low-lying combined state in even mass nuclei. We have described the O(6) limit in the ¹⁰⁸’¹¹⁰’¹¹²Ru nuclei by IBM-1 model. The B(E2) strength and energy levels in different bands were established in good agreement theoretically and experimentally. The calculated potential energy surfaces (PES) of those nuclei were suggested O(6) characters.
Модель взаємодіючих бозонів (IBM-1) дуже важлива для низькорозташованого комбінованого станa в ядрах рівної маси. Ми описали межу O(6) в ядрах ¹⁰⁸’¹¹⁰’¹¹²Ru за моделлю IBM-1. Сила B(E2) і рівні енергії в різних діапазонах були встановлені в хорошому узгодженні теоретично і експериментально. Розраховані поверхні потенціальної енергії (PES) цих ядер були запропоновані O(6) характеру.
Authors are grateful to the authority of DSR for technical and financial support at King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah. The authors are very grateful to the College of Health and Medical Technology, Alkafeel University and University of Mosul/College of Education for Pure Science for their provided facilities, which helped to improve the quality of this work.
en
Національний науковий центр «Харківський фізико-технічний інститут» НАН України
Problems of Atomic Science and Technology
Computational and model systems
Study of O(6) symmetry in ¹⁰⁸’¹¹⁰’¹¹²Ru isotopes by IBM-1 calculation
Дослідження симетрії O(6) в ізотопах ¹⁰⁸’¹¹⁰’¹¹²Ru за розрахунком IBM-1
Article
published earlier
spellingShingle Study of O(6) symmetry in ¹⁰⁸’¹¹⁰’¹¹²Ru isotopes by IBM-1 calculation
Hossain, I.
Kassim, H.H.
Al-Jubbori, M.A.
Saleh, A.
Viswanathan, K.K.
Salam, A.
Sharrad, F.I.
Computational and model systems
title Study of O(6) symmetry in ¹⁰⁸’¹¹⁰’¹¹²Ru isotopes by IBM-1 calculation
title_alt Дослідження симетрії O(6) в ізотопах ¹⁰⁸’¹¹⁰’¹¹²Ru за розрахунком IBM-1
title_full Study of O(6) symmetry in ¹⁰⁸’¹¹⁰’¹¹²Ru isotopes by IBM-1 calculation
title_fullStr Study of O(6) symmetry in ¹⁰⁸’¹¹⁰’¹¹²Ru isotopes by IBM-1 calculation
title_full_unstemmed Study of O(6) symmetry in ¹⁰⁸’¹¹⁰’¹¹²Ru isotopes by IBM-1 calculation
title_short Study of O(6) symmetry in ¹⁰⁸’¹¹⁰’¹¹²Ru isotopes by IBM-1 calculation
title_sort study of o(6) symmetry in ¹⁰⁸’¹¹⁰’¹¹²ru isotopes by ibm-1 calculation
topic Computational and model systems
topic_facet Computational and model systems
url https://nasplib.isofts.kiev.ua/handle/123456789/196145
work_keys_str_mv AT hossaini studyofo6symmetryin108110112ruisotopesbyibm1calculation
AT kassimhh studyofo6symmetryin108110112ruisotopesbyibm1calculation
AT aljubborima studyofo6symmetryin108110112ruisotopesbyibm1calculation
AT saleha studyofo6symmetryin108110112ruisotopesbyibm1calculation
AT viswanathankk studyofo6symmetryin108110112ruisotopesbyibm1calculation
AT salama studyofo6symmetryin108110112ruisotopesbyibm1calculation
AT sharradfi studyofo6symmetryin108110112ruisotopesbyibm1calculation
AT hossaini doslídžennâsimetríío6vízotopah108110112ruzarozrahunkomibm1
AT kassimhh doslídžennâsimetríío6vízotopah108110112ruzarozrahunkomibm1
AT aljubborima doslídžennâsimetríío6vízotopah108110112ruzarozrahunkomibm1
AT saleha doslídžennâsimetríío6vízotopah108110112ruzarozrahunkomibm1
AT viswanathankk doslídžennâsimetríío6vízotopah108110112ruzarozrahunkomibm1
AT salama doslídžennâsimetríío6vízotopah108110112ruzarozrahunkomibm1
AT sharradfi doslídžennâsimetríío6vízotopah108110112ruzarozrahunkomibm1