Про ще одну концепцію «неоліту» із рисами постмодернізму
У статті проаналізовано теоретичні погляди
 В. О. Манька щодо терміна «неоліт» та суті процесу неолітизації. Зроблено висновок, що одні з них
 повторюють ідеї представників постпроцесуалістської археології, а решта є, хоч і оригінальними,
 проте методологічно неоформленими, с...
Saved in:
| Published in: | Археологія |
|---|---|
| Date: | 2022 |
| Main Author: | |
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | Ukrainian |
| Published: |
Інститут археології НАН України
2022
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://nasplib.isofts.kiev.ua/handle/123456789/199516 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| Journal Title: | Digital Library of Periodicals of National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine |
| Cite this: | Про ще одну концепцію "неоліту" із рисами постмодернізму / Д.Л. Гаскевич // Археологія. — 2022. — № 4. — С. 105-119. — укр. |
Institution
Digital Library of Periodicals of National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine| _version_ | 1862730190397898752 |
|---|---|
| author | Гаскевич, Д.Л. |
| author_facet | Гаскевич, Д.Л. |
| citation_txt | Про ще одну концепцію "неоліту" із рисами постмодернізму / Д.Л. Гаскевич // Археологія. — 2022. — № 4. — С. 105-119. — укр. |
| collection | DSpace DC |
| container_title | Археологія |
| description | У статті проаналізовано теоретичні погляди
В. О. Манька щодо терміна «неоліт» та суті процесу неолітизації. Зроблено висновок, що одні з них
повторюють ідеї представників постпроцесуалістської археології, а решта є, хоч і оригінальними,
проте методологічно неоформленими, сповненими
протиріч та логічних хиб.
Valerii Manko and Guram Chkhatarashvili published their article in the “Arheologia”, No. 2, 2022. In the paper, they discussed
the migration of bearers of four Neolithic flint industries from Southwest Asia through the Caucasus to the south of Eastern
Europe from the final Pleistocene to the early Atlantic. According to the authors, stable connections between these remote areas
led to the emergence of four “information networks”, which they called “Cultural-Historical Regions” (CHR). The authors
believe that the first region of such type in human history was the Pre-Pottery Neolithic A (PPNA) in the Near East. Therefore,
they call the “theoretical basis” of their study “the idea of understanding the Neolithic as an epoch of the formation of global
information networks, within which innovations created in the Near and Middle East were disseminated.”
V. Manko began to develop the described theoretical views in 2010 when he wrote that the reason for the emergence of the
CHR is the ability to communicate, formed due to the mental changes of inhabitants of the PPNA large settlements. The statement
about specific psyche and worldview as the basis of Neolithic has been expressed as an idea of Post-Processual archaeology long
before V. Manko announced it. In particular, Trevor Watkins developed this concept in detail. However, V. Manko does not
mention works by any post-processualists in his publications.
The statement about the formation of the ability to communicate only in the Neolithic is V. Manko’s novelty. He based it on
one reference to a publication of Alexey N. Sorokin, who allegedly claimed that the bearers of different flint industries did not
contact each other in the central part of European Russia in the Mesolithic. V. Manko misinterpreted this particular subjective
observation and gave it the meaning of a global pattern. Thus, his definition of the Neolithic is controversial, because of using this
erroneous premise. Generally, V. Manko’s theoretical reasoning is full of contradictions, logical errors, terminological chaos,
and rhetoric in the postmodernism style. It is noteworthy that V. Manko himself does not fully adhere to his previous theoretical
views in his later works.
|
| first_indexed | 2025-12-07T19:18:39Z |
| format | Article |
| fulltext | |
| id | nasplib_isofts_kiev_ua-123456789-199516 |
| institution | Digital Library of Periodicals of National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine |
| issn | 0235-3490 |
| language | Ukrainian |
| last_indexed | 2025-12-07T19:18:39Z |
| publishDate | 2022 |
| publisher | Інститут археології НАН України |
| record_format | dspace |
| spelling | Гаскевич, Д.Л. 2024-10-12T15:56:52Z 2024-10-12T15:56:52Z 2022 Про ще одну концепцію "неоліту" із рисами постмодернізму / Д.Л. Гаскевич // Археологія. — 2022. — № 4. — С. 105-119. — укр. 0235-3490 DOI: https://doi.org/10.15407/arheologia2022.04.105 https://nasplib.isofts.kiev.ua/handle/123456789/199516 [903:001.891.3]”634” У статті проаналізовано теоретичні погляди
 В. О. Манька щодо терміна «неоліт» та суті процесу неолітизації. Зроблено висновок, що одні з них
 повторюють ідеї представників постпроцесуалістської археології, а решта є, хоч і оригінальними,
 проте методологічно неоформленими, сповненими
 протиріч та логічних хиб. Valerii Manko and Guram Chkhatarashvili published their article in the “Arheologia”, No. 2, 2022. In the paper, they discussed
 the migration of bearers of four Neolithic flint industries from Southwest Asia through the Caucasus to the south of Eastern
 Europe from the final Pleistocene to the early Atlantic. According to the authors, stable connections between these remote areas
 led to the emergence of four “information networks”, which they called “Cultural-Historical Regions” (CHR). The authors
 believe that the first region of such type in human history was the Pre-Pottery Neolithic A (PPNA) in the Near East. Therefore,
 they call the “theoretical basis” of their study “the idea of understanding the Neolithic as an epoch of the formation of global
 information networks, within which innovations created in the Near and Middle East were disseminated.”
 V. Manko began to develop the described theoretical views in 2010 when he wrote that the reason for the emergence of the
 CHR is the ability to communicate, formed due to the mental changes of inhabitants of the PPNA large settlements. The statement
 about specific psyche and worldview as the basis of Neolithic has been expressed as an idea of Post-Processual archaeology long
 before V. Manko announced it. In particular, Trevor Watkins developed this concept in detail. However, V. Manko does not
 mention works by any post-processualists in his publications.
 The statement about the formation of the ability to communicate only in the Neolithic is V. Manko’s novelty. He based it on
 one reference to a publication of Alexey N. Sorokin, who allegedly claimed that the bearers of different flint industries did not
 contact each other in the central part of European Russia in the Mesolithic. V. Manko misinterpreted this particular subjective
 observation and gave it the meaning of a global pattern. Thus, his definition of the Neolithic is controversial, because of using this
 erroneous premise. Generally, V. Manko’s theoretical reasoning is full of contradictions, logical errors, terminological chaos,
 and rhetoric in the postmodernism style. It is noteworthy that V. Manko himself does not fully adhere to his previous theoretical
 views in his later works. Автор щиро дякує анонімному рецензентові
 за слушні поради щодо покращення статті. uk Інститут археології НАН України Археологія Дискусiї Про ще одну концепцію «неоліту» із рисами постмодернізму On One More Concept of “Neolithic” Based on the Postmodernism Approach Article published earlier |
| spellingShingle | Про ще одну концепцію «неоліту» із рисами постмодернізму Гаскевич, Д.Л. Дискусiї |
| title | Про ще одну концепцію «неоліту» із рисами постмодернізму |
| title_alt | On One More Concept of “Neolithic” Based on the Postmodernism Approach |
| title_full | Про ще одну концепцію «неоліту» із рисами постмодернізму |
| title_fullStr | Про ще одну концепцію «неоліту» із рисами постмодернізму |
| title_full_unstemmed | Про ще одну концепцію «неоліту» із рисами постмодернізму |
| title_short | Про ще одну концепцію «неоліту» із рисами постмодернізму |
| title_sort | про ще одну концепцію «неоліту» із рисами постмодернізму |
| topic | Дискусiї |
| topic_facet | Дискусiї |
| url | https://nasplib.isofts.kiev.ua/handle/123456789/199516 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT gaskevičdl proŝeodnukoncepcíûneolítuízrisamipostmodernízmu AT gaskevičdl ononemoreconceptofneolithicbasedonthepostmodernismapproach |