Про ще одну концепцію «неоліту» із рисами постмодернізму

У статті проаналізовано теоретичні погляди В. О. Манька щодо терміна «неоліт» та суті процесу неолітизації. Зроблено висновок, що одні з них повторюють ідеї представників постпроцесуалістської археології, а решта є, хоч і оригінальними, проте методологічно неоформленими, сповненими протиріч та л...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Археологія
Datum:2022
1. Verfasser: Гаскевич, Д.Л.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:Ukrainian
Veröffentlicht: Інститут археології НАН України 2022
Schlagworte:
Online Zugang:https://nasplib.isofts.kiev.ua/handle/123456789/199516
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Назва журналу:Digital Library of Periodicals of National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine
Zitieren:Про ще одну концепцію "неоліту" із рисами постмодернізму / Д.Л. Гаскевич // Археологія. — 2022. — № 4. — С. 105-119. — укр.

Institution

Digital Library of Periodicals of National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine
id nasplib_isofts_kiev_ua-123456789-199516
record_format dspace
spelling Гаскевич, Д.Л.
2024-10-12T15:56:52Z
2024-10-12T15:56:52Z
2022
Про ще одну концепцію "неоліту" із рисами постмодернізму / Д.Л. Гаскевич // Археологія. — 2022. — № 4. — С. 105-119. — укр.
0235-3490
DOI: https://doi.org/10.15407/arheologia2022.04.105
https://nasplib.isofts.kiev.ua/handle/123456789/199516
[903:001.891.3]”634”
У статті проаналізовано теоретичні погляди В. О. Манька щодо терміна «неоліт» та суті процесу неолітизації. Зроблено висновок, що одні з них повторюють ідеї представників постпроцесуалістської археології, а решта є, хоч і оригінальними, проте методологічно неоформленими, сповненими протиріч та логічних хиб.
Valerii Manko and Guram Chkhatarashvili published their article in the “Arheologia”, No. 2, 2022. In the paper, they discussed the migration of bearers of four Neolithic flint industries from Southwest Asia through the Caucasus to the south of Eastern Europe from the final Pleistocene to the early Atlantic. According to the authors, stable connections between these remote areas led to the emergence of four “information networks”, which they called “Cultural-Historical Regions” (CHR). The authors believe that the first region of such type in human history was the Pre-Pottery Neolithic A (PPNA) in the Near East. Therefore, they call the “theoretical basis” of their study “the idea of understanding the Neolithic as an epoch of the formation of global information networks, within which innovations created in the Near and Middle East were disseminated.” V. Manko began to develop the described theoretical views in 2010 when he wrote that the reason for the emergence of the CHR is the ability to communicate, formed due to the mental changes of inhabitants of the PPNA large settlements. The statement about specific psyche and worldview as the basis of Neolithic has been expressed as an idea of Post-Processual archaeology long before V. Manko announced it. In particular, Trevor Watkins developed this concept in detail. However, V. Manko does not mention works by any post-processualists in his publications. The statement about the formation of the ability to communicate only in the Neolithic is V. Manko’s novelty. He based it on one reference to a publication of Alexey N. Sorokin, who allegedly claimed that the bearers of different flint industries did not contact each other in the central part of European Russia in the Mesolithic. V. Manko misinterpreted this particular subjective observation and gave it the meaning of a global pattern. Thus, his definition of the Neolithic is controversial, because of using this erroneous premise. Generally, V. Manko’s theoretical reasoning is full of contradictions, logical errors, terminological chaos, and rhetoric in the postmodernism style. It is noteworthy that V. Manko himself does not fully adhere to his previous theoretical views in his later works.
Автор щиро дякує анонімному рецензентові за слушні поради щодо покращення статті.
uk
Інститут археології НАН України
Археологія
Дискусiї
Про ще одну концепцію «неоліту» із рисами постмодернізму
On One More Concept of “Neolithic” Based on the Postmodernism Approach
Article
published earlier
institution Digital Library of Periodicals of National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine
collection DSpace DC
title Про ще одну концепцію «неоліту» із рисами постмодернізму
spellingShingle Про ще одну концепцію «неоліту» із рисами постмодернізму
Гаскевич, Д.Л.
Дискусiї
title_short Про ще одну концепцію «неоліту» із рисами постмодернізму
title_full Про ще одну концепцію «неоліту» із рисами постмодернізму
title_fullStr Про ще одну концепцію «неоліту» із рисами постмодернізму
title_full_unstemmed Про ще одну концепцію «неоліту» із рисами постмодернізму
title_sort про ще одну концепцію «неоліту» із рисами постмодернізму
author Гаскевич, Д.Л.
author_facet Гаскевич, Д.Л.
topic Дискусiї
topic_facet Дискусiї
publishDate 2022
language Ukrainian
container_title Археологія
publisher Інститут археології НАН України
format Article
title_alt On One More Concept of “Neolithic” Based on the Postmodernism Approach
description У статті проаналізовано теоретичні погляди В. О. Манька щодо терміна «неоліт» та суті процесу неолітизації. Зроблено висновок, що одні з них повторюють ідеї представників постпроцесуалістської археології, а решта є, хоч і оригінальними, проте методологічно неоформленими, сповненими протиріч та логічних хиб. Valerii Manko and Guram Chkhatarashvili published their article in the “Arheologia”, No. 2, 2022. In the paper, they discussed the migration of bearers of four Neolithic flint industries from Southwest Asia through the Caucasus to the south of Eastern Europe from the final Pleistocene to the early Atlantic. According to the authors, stable connections between these remote areas led to the emergence of four “information networks”, which they called “Cultural-Historical Regions” (CHR). The authors believe that the first region of such type in human history was the Pre-Pottery Neolithic A (PPNA) in the Near East. Therefore, they call the “theoretical basis” of their study “the idea of understanding the Neolithic as an epoch of the formation of global information networks, within which innovations created in the Near and Middle East were disseminated.” V. Manko began to develop the described theoretical views in 2010 when he wrote that the reason for the emergence of the CHR is the ability to communicate, formed due to the mental changes of inhabitants of the PPNA large settlements. The statement about specific psyche and worldview as the basis of Neolithic has been expressed as an idea of Post-Processual archaeology long before V. Manko announced it. In particular, Trevor Watkins developed this concept in detail. However, V. Manko does not mention works by any post-processualists in his publications. The statement about the formation of the ability to communicate only in the Neolithic is V. Manko’s novelty. He based it on one reference to a publication of Alexey N. Sorokin, who allegedly claimed that the bearers of different flint industries did not contact each other in the central part of European Russia in the Mesolithic. V. Manko misinterpreted this particular subjective observation and gave it the meaning of a global pattern. Thus, his definition of the Neolithic is controversial, because of using this erroneous premise. Generally, V. Manko’s theoretical reasoning is full of contradictions, logical errors, terminological chaos, and rhetoric in the postmodernism style. It is noteworthy that V. Manko himself does not fully adhere to his previous theoretical views in his later works.
issn 0235-3490
url https://nasplib.isofts.kiev.ua/handle/123456789/199516
citation_txt Про ще одну концепцію "неоліту" із рисами постмодернізму / Д.Л. Гаскевич // Археологія. — 2022. — № 4. — С. 105-119. — укр.
work_keys_str_mv AT gaskevičdl proŝeodnukoncepcíûneolítuízrisamipostmodernízmu
AT gaskevičdl ononemoreconceptofneolithicbasedonthepostmodernismapproach
first_indexed 2025-12-07T19:18:39Z
last_indexed 2025-12-07T19:18:39Z
_version_ 1850878322894962688