Cyclicality of human-centered development of Ukraine in the system of principles of state strategic planning
The article considers the conceptual provisions of increasing the social responsibility of central bodies and legislative and executive authorities of Ukraine for the preparation, adoption and implementation of national decisions. Examples of violation of the established deadlines for bringing decis...
Збережено в:
| Опубліковано в: : | Економічний вісник Донбасу |
|---|---|
| Дата: | 2024 |
| Автор: | |
| Формат: | Стаття |
| Мова: | English |
| Опубліковано: |
Інститут економіки промисловості НАН України
2024
|
| Теми: | |
| Онлайн доступ: | https://nasplib.isofts.kiev.ua/handle/123456789/203355 |
| Теги: |
Додати тег
Немає тегів, Будьте першим, хто поставить тег для цього запису!
|
| Назва журналу: | Digital Library of Periodicals of National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine |
| Цитувати: | Cyclicality of human-centered development of Ukraine in the system of principles of state strategic planning / V. Stolyarov, О. Shinkaryuk, V. Stolyarova, S. Vorobey // Економічний вісник Донбасу. — 2024. — № 4 (78). — С. 200-207. — Бібліогр.: 8 назв. — англ. |
Репозитарії
Digital Library of Periodicals of National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine| id |
nasplib_isofts_kiev_ua-123456789-203355 |
|---|---|
| record_format |
dspace |
| spelling |
Stolyarov V., Shinkaryuk О., Stolyarova V., Vorobey S. 2025-05-23T09:25:45Z 2024 Cyclicality of human-centered development of Ukraine in the system of principles of state strategic planning / V. Stolyarov, О. Shinkaryuk, V. Stolyarova, S. Vorobey // Економічний вісник Донбасу. — 2024. — № 4 (78). — С. 200-207. — Бібліогр.: 8 назв. — англ. 1817-3772 https://nasplib.isofts.kiev.ua/handle/123456789/203355 331.5+331.24+338.23 https://doi.org/10.12958/1817-3772-2024-4(78)-200-207 The article considers the conceptual provisions of increasing the social responsibility of central bodies and legislative and executive authorities of Ukraine for the preparation, adoption and implementation of national decisions. Examples of violation of the established deadlines for bringing decisions to regional and local authorities are given. Consideration of the principles of state and strategic planning of draft laws of 2011 and 2017, as system-forming foundations of statehood, ensured the identification of the root causes of the violation of the 1996 Constitution as a united, sovereign and independent state. Long-term management errors and tactical blunders in statehood were identified. The main reason for the cyclical nature of human development in the regions is recognized as the inability of central authorities to strategically manage Ukrainian society. The need for the formation of the Planning Code of Ukraine as a complex of strategic and tactical national decisions and the basis for increasing the social responsibility of authorities of different levels is proven. The construction of a new economy of a renewed state is focused on ensuring the centrality of planning decisions of state entities in the course of the purposeful implementation of a single nationwide socio-economic policy. В статті розглянуті концептуальні положення підвищення соціальної відповідальності центральних органів й законодавчої і виконавчої влади України за підготовку, прийняття і виконання загальнодержавних рішень. Наведені приклади порушення встановлених термінів доведення рішень до регіональних і місцевих органів влади. Розгляд принципів державного і стратегічного планування законопроектів 2011 і 2017 років, як системо утворюючих підстав державотворення, забезпечив виявлення першопричин порушення Конституції 1996 року як соборної, суверенної і незалежної держави. З’ясовані управлінські помилки на довгострокову перспективу та тактичні промахи в державотворенні. Головною причиною виникнення циклічності людського розвитку регіонів визнано невміння центральних органів влади стратегічно управляти українським суспільством. Доведена необхідність формування планового кодексу України як комплексу стратегічних і тактичних загальнодержавних рішень та базису підвищення соціальної відповідальності органів влади різних рівнів. Побудова нової економіки оновленої держави орієнтована на забезпечення доцентрованості планових рішень суб’єктів держави в ході цілеспрямованого впровадження єдиної загальнодержавної соціально-економічної політики. en Інститут економіки промисловості НАН України Економічний вісник Донбасу Discussion club Cyclicality of human-centered development of Ukraine in the system of principles of state strategic planning Циклічність людиноцентриського розвитку України в системі принципів державного стратегічного планування Article published earlier |
| institution |
Digital Library of Periodicals of National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine |
| collection |
DSpace DC |
| title |
Cyclicality of human-centered development of Ukraine in the system of principles of state strategic planning |
| spellingShingle |
Cyclicality of human-centered development of Ukraine in the system of principles of state strategic planning Stolyarov V., Shinkaryuk О., Stolyarova V., Vorobey S. Discussion club |
| title_short |
Cyclicality of human-centered development of Ukraine in the system of principles of state strategic planning |
| title_full |
Cyclicality of human-centered development of Ukraine in the system of principles of state strategic planning |
| title_fullStr |
Cyclicality of human-centered development of Ukraine in the system of principles of state strategic planning |
| title_full_unstemmed |
Cyclicality of human-centered development of Ukraine in the system of principles of state strategic planning |
| title_sort |
cyclicality of human-centered development of ukraine in the system of principles of state strategic planning |
| author |
Stolyarov V., Shinkaryuk О., Stolyarova V., Vorobey S. |
| author_facet |
Stolyarov V., Shinkaryuk О., Stolyarova V., Vorobey S. |
| topic |
Discussion club |
| topic_facet |
Discussion club |
| publishDate |
2024 |
| language |
English |
| container_title |
Економічний вісник Донбасу |
| publisher |
Інститут економіки промисловості НАН України |
| format |
Article |
| title_alt |
Циклічність людиноцентриського розвитку України в системі принципів державного стратегічного планування |
| description |
The article considers the conceptual provisions of increasing the social responsibility of central bodies and legislative and executive authorities of Ukraine for the preparation, adoption and implementation of national decisions. Examples of violation of the established deadlines for bringing decisions to regional and local authorities are given.
Consideration of the principles of state and strategic planning of draft laws of 2011 and 2017, as system-forming foundations of statehood, ensured the identification of the root causes of the violation of the 1996 Constitution as a united, sovereign and independent state.
Long-term management errors and tactical blunders in statehood were identified. The main reason for the cyclical nature of human development in the regions is recognized as the inability of central authorities to strategically manage Ukrainian society.
The need for the formation of the Planning Code of Ukraine as a complex of strategic and tactical national decisions and the basis for increasing the social responsibility of authorities of different levels is proven.
The construction of a new economy of a renewed state is focused on ensuring the centrality of planning decisions of state entities in the course of the purposeful implementation of a single nationwide socio-economic policy.
В статті розглянуті концептуальні положення підвищення соціальної відповідальності центральних органів й законодавчої і виконавчої влади України за підготовку, прийняття і виконання загальнодержавних рішень. Наведені приклади порушення встановлених термінів доведення рішень до регіональних і місцевих органів влади.
Розгляд принципів державного і стратегічного планування законопроектів 2011 і 2017 років, як системо утворюючих підстав державотворення, забезпечив виявлення першопричин порушення Конституції 1996 року як соборної, суверенної і незалежної держави.
З’ясовані управлінські помилки на довгострокову перспективу та тактичні промахи в державотворенні. Головною причиною виникнення циклічності людського розвитку регіонів визнано невміння центральних органів влади стратегічно управляти українським суспільством.
Доведена необхідність формування планового кодексу України як комплексу стратегічних і тактичних загальнодержавних рішень та базису підвищення соціальної відповідальності органів влади різних рівнів.
Побудова нової економіки оновленої держави орієнтована на забезпечення доцентрованості планових рішень суб’єктів держави в ході цілеспрямованого впровадження єдиної загальнодержавної соціально-економічної політики.
|
| issn |
1817-3772 |
| url |
https://nasplib.isofts.kiev.ua/handle/123456789/203355 |
| citation_txt |
Cyclicality of human-centered development of Ukraine in the system of principles of state strategic planning / V. Stolyarov, О. Shinkaryuk, V. Stolyarova, S. Vorobey // Економічний вісник Донбасу. — 2024. — № 4 (78). — С. 200-207. — Бібліогр.: 8 назв. — англ. |
| work_keys_str_mv |
AT stolyarovvshinkaryukostolyarovavvorobeys cyclicalityofhumancentereddevelopmentofukraineinthesystemofprinciplesofstatestrategicplanning AT stolyarovvshinkaryukostolyarovavvorobeys ciklíčnístʹlûdinocentrisʹkogorozvitkuukraínivsistemíprincipívderžavnogostrategíčnogoplanuvannâ |
| first_indexed |
2025-11-24T16:11:47Z |
| last_indexed |
2025-11-24T16:11:47Z |
| _version_ |
1850851284786085888 |
| fulltext |
V. Stolyarov, O. Shinkaryuk, V. Stolyarova, S. Vorobey
200
ISSN 1817-3772 Економічний вісник Донбасу № 4(78), 2024
DISCUSSION CLUB
DOI: https://doi.org/10.12958/1817-3772-2024-4(78)-200-207
UDC 331.5+331.24+338.23
V. Stolyarov,
DrHab (Economics), Professor,
ORCID 0000-0002-4399-7117,
e-mail: stolyarovvf@ukr.net,
O. Shinkaryuk,
PhD (Economics),
ORCID 0000-0002-3004-0404,
V. Stolyarova,
PhD (Economics),
ORCID 0000-0002-9483-5126,
Institute of Physical Economy named after S. A. Podolynskyi, Kyiv,
S. Vorobey,
PhD student,
ORCID 0009-0008-3711-9407,
Kharkiv National Economic University named after Semyon Kuznets
CYCLICALITY OF HUMAN-CENTERED DEVELOPMENT OF UKRAINE
IN THE SYSTEM OF PRINCIPLES OF STATE STRATEGIC PLANNING
Introduction. In accordance with the state socio-
economic policy, state strategic planning of human-
centered development is the basis for the
implementation of the constitutional provisions of a
united, sovereign and independent Ukraine. The input
conditions of state strategic planning are the presence of
a long-term demographic forecast and a forecast of the
country's innovative, technological and scientific and
technical development.
The main condition for achieving proper
effectiveness of state strategic planning is, first of all,
the unity and adequacy of real affairs with management
decisions for the long-term (more than 10-15 years)
perspective of different levels of management. The
motto "Unity of words and deeds" becomes a criterion
for purposeful, stable and planned-sustainable human-
centered development of the country.
The set of principles of state strategic planning
forms a complex of scientific and practical knowledge
of the systemic methodology for preparing, adopting
and monitoring the implementation of local manage-
ment decisions in accordance with the requirements of
their integration as a single whole.
The systematic methodology of state strategic
planning should include processes and procedures for
harmonizing social relations based on the social
responsibility of subjects and management bodies in
accordance with the social division of labor.
Social responsibility is defined by specialists and
scientists of the Institute of Industrial Economics of the
National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine (Donetsk –
Kyiv) as “an expression of will, conditioned by
appropriate behavior in compliance with perceived
restrictions and social norms, guarantees security and
progressive development, and ensures the coherence of
interests of subjects involved in public relations and
their management” [1, p. 42].
An expert survey in 2012 on obstacles to Ukraine’s
implementation of international commitments on
sustainable development showed a lack of focus of state
and regional management systems on their
implementation (65.2% of experts indicated this reason)
[1, p. 44].
Therefore, the development of development
strategies for Ukraine at the national and regional levels
of government based on the principles of state strategic
planning should be based on social responsibility, taking
into account:
– International standards of social responsibility
ISO 2600;
– ISO 9001:2000;
– ISO 14000 standard in the field of environmental
management systems;
– GRI- recommendations for reporting in the field
of sustainable development.
© Publisher Institute of Industrial Economy of National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine, 2024
© Publisher State Higher Education Institution "Luhansk Taras Shevchenko National University", 2024
V. Stolyarov, O. Shinkaryuk, V. Stolyarova, S. Vorobey
201
Економічний вісник Донбасу № 4(78), 2024 ISSN 1817-3772
In accordance with international standards, social
responsibility in Ukraine should be considered as the
responsibility of the state for a decent standard of living
of current and future generations with the definition of
the best ways to achieve stable and planned sustainable
human-centered development.
The former, unopposed head of Ukraine Petro
Poroshenko (speaking at the 70th anniversary session of
the UN General Assembly on September 25, 2015,
which adopted the Sustainable Development Goals
(SDGs) for the period up to 2030) noted that in order to
achieve them at the national level, Ukraine will
implement new programs and projects that will
practically ensure macroeconomic stability, environ-
mental balance and social cohesion. The SDGs will
serve as a common basis for further transformations in
Ukraine as an independent, sovereign, social, legal and
unitary state.
Unfortunately, in 2016-2020. this intention was not
implemented either by the Government of Ukraine or by
Petro Poroshenko's Solidarity Bloc in Parliament. In the
elections to the Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine of the 9th
convocation, the election programs “Ukrainian Govern-
ment: Yesterday and Today”, “European Solidarity” and
“V. Groysman’s Ukrainian Strategy” did not contain
any provisions regarding these intentions, not to
mention the relevant project justifications and planning
and forecast calculations.
The State Target Program for the Restoration and
Building of Peace in the Eastern Regions of Ukraine
(December 2017 [2]) noted that during its
implementation the provisions of the National Report
“Sustainable Development Goals: Ukraine 2030” would
be taken into account. On the contrary, the provisions of
this National Report should have become the basis of
this program. That is, the increase in the social
responsibility of the Government of Ukraine for
program decisions in the future did not occur.
The 6th President of the «Republic of UKRAINE»,
Mr. Zelensky, who was elected in turn, was among the
first to adopt the Decree of September 20, 2019 No. 713
“On Urgent Measures to Ensure Evolutionary Growth,
Stimulate the Development of Regions and Prevent
Corruption”, in which he obliged the Cabinet of
Ministers of Ukraine to ensure the development and
approval of the State Strategy for Regional
Development for 2021-2027 by January 1, 2020.
The development of this strategy was started by the
Ministry of Regional Development of UKRAINE ahead
of schedule – from April 1, 2019. According to the
current regulatory and methodological instructions, the
strategy should have been approved by July 1, 2020
(6 months from the start of its implementation –
January 1, 2021). But, despite the instructions of the 6th
President, the State Strategy for Regional Development
for 2021-2027 was approved by the Government on
August 5, 2020, that is, 7 months later. Public
information on the status of implementation of the
Presidential Decree of September 20, 2019. No. 713
should have been provided by October 15, 2019 and
January 20, 2020. In the legal framework of UKRAINE,
there is no social, administrative and criminal liability
for failure to meet reporting deadlines.
President of UKRAINE Zelensky, by his decree of
September 30, 2019 No. 722 “On the Sustainable
Development Goals of Ukraine for the period up to
2030”, decided to ensure compliance with and
publication of the implemented effective system for
monitoring their implementation annually by March 1
of the year following the reporting year. But information
on the implementation of the 7 national Sustainable
Development Goals adapted for UKRAINE, starting
from 2019, is not publicly available. First of all, there is
no information on the implementation of the First
Goal – "Eliminate poverty".
The aforementioned Decree of the President of
UKRAINE dated September 30, 2019 No. 722
recommends that scientific institutions take into account
the national objectives of the Sustainable Development
Goals of UKRAINE when determining the areas of
scientific research.
But why are the goals and key objectives of the
Strategic Plans of the Ministry of Economy of Ukraine
for 2020-2024 and for 2022-2024 not aimed at
organizing and mobilizing the implementation of
national tasks of priority SDGs for the period until 2030
(with target values for 2015, 2020, 2025 and 2030)?:
– Goal 1. Poverty eradication (3 objectives,
5 indicators);
– Goal 2. Hunger eradication, agricultural
development (2 objectives, 4 indicators);
– Goal 3. Good health and well-being (8 tasks,
15 indicators);
– Goal 4. Quality education (3 tasks, 5 indicators).
In this regard, it is absolutely appropriate, by
analogy with the Action Plan for the Implementation of
State Regional Development Strategies for the Period
Until 2020 and for 2021-2027, to reform the Strategic
Action Plans of the Ministry of Economy of Ukraine
into Action Plans for Organizational and Mobilization
Activities to Achieve National SDG Tasks for the
Relevant Periods: Until 2020, 2025 and 2030.
That is, there is an urgent need to develop and
adopt the Planning Code of Ukraine, which should
regulate the time and content of the stages of preparation
and adoption of the Addresses of the President of
Ukraine to the People and the Verkhovna Rada, the
Work Plans of the Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine, the
Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine and the Central
Executive Authorities (CEAs) of the socio-economic
sphere, etc. Specialists of the S. A. Podolinsky Institute
of Physical Economics have been proposing the
development of a Planning Code of Ukraine for the past
10 years [3, p. 35].
However, the recommendations and proposals of
scientists and specialists of domestic economic science
(even of an applied nature) remain beyond the attention
of the state leadership, people's deputies and Ukrainian
V. Stolyarov, O. Shinkaryuk, V. Stolyarova, S. Vorobey
202
ISSN 1817-3772 Економічний вісник Донбасу № 4(78), 2024
officials. The main reason lies in the material
stimulation of officials at the expense of financial funds
from technical assistance from overseas donors.
The implementation of domestic initiative
developments is not included in the plans of overseas
"overseers" - beneficiaries of the Ukrainian crisis. The
Planning Code of Ukraine should be based on the Law
of Ukraine "On State Strategic Planning", and its
development – on the reference matrix of systemic
analysis and design of components of a fundamentally
new state-building.
The urgent need to adopt the Planning Code of
Ukraine is due to the violation of the deadlines for the
development, adoption and delivery to the executors of
state planning decisions: The Strategic Plan of the
Ministry of Economy for 2020-2022 was adopted in
August 2020 (on the 8th month after the start of its
implementation), and for 2022-2024 – in November
2021 (in 45 days, as was the case in the practice of a
planned economy).
Problem statement and purpose of the article. The
mechanisms of post-war development of the national
economy should be based on the need to strengthen its
statehood by clarifying the strategic directions of socio-
economic development and tactical levers of state
regulation using direct and feedback links in the
hierarchy of state formation.
According to the Constitution of Ukraine, the
construction of a new economy of a renewed state
should be focused on strengthening the centripetalism of
planning decisions of subjects of different levels of the
system during the purposeful implementation of a single
state socio-economic policy.
Currently, it is planned to expand the use of
program-target and project methods of substantiating
new planning decisions with simultaneous clarification
of strategic goals that have not been achieved over the
past 7-10 years with adjustment of their budgeting for
the nearest medium-term perspective of 3-5 years.
The purpose of the article is to conduct an
epistemological analysis of the essence and content of
the principles of strategic planning of the socio-
economic development of Ukraine, which were
provided for by the draft laws of 2011 and 2017. It is
advisable to orient public consciousness towards
increasing social responsibility for public compliance
with the principles of strategic planning of the socio-
economic development of the state based on the
methodology and ideas of anthropocentrism.
The working hypothesis of the article examines the
signs and causes of social tension in Ukrainian society
during the transition from an administrative-command
planned economy to an Anglo-Saxon model of a
corporate-type market economy, focused on generating
income in the context of globalization through
geopolitical wars of transnational corporations.
Presentation of the main materials of the study.
The draft law of Ukraine No. 9407 “On State Strategic
Planning” was submitted to the Verkhovna Rada by the
Cabinet of Ministers on November 3, 2011, signed by
Prime Minister Mykola Azarov. The Verkhovna Rada
adopted the law as a whole on December 22, 2011: 249
MPs voted “in favor” (out of the minimum required
226).
Draft Law No. 9407 defined the following
principles of state strategic planning: 1. Integrity;
2. Internal balance; 3. Scientific validity; 4. Transpa-
rency; 5. Effectiveness; 6. Compliance with national
interests; 7. Equality; 8. Continuity and completeness of
decision-making; 9. Partnership; 10. Responsibilities of
participants in state strategic planning.
The sixth principle deserves special attention, the
essence of which is the development by the Ministries
and other central executive bodies, local executive
bodies and local self-government bodies and the
Verkhovna Rada of the Autonomous Republic of
Crimea of state strategic planning documents, based on
the need to ensure the implementation of the national
socio-economic policy. The effectiveness of the
functioning of the state strategic planning system lies in
the fact that the choice of means and methods for
achieving the country's development goals should
ensure the achievement of planned results with the least
expenditure of resources, and the assessment of the
achievement of goals depends on the results obtained.
In 2011, the Ministry of Economic Development
and Trade of UKRAINE, for the first time in the years
of independence, created a unique state document on the
forecast of the comprehensive development of the
national economy and the social sphere. But serious
remarks by the President of UKRAINE Viktor Yanuko-
vych regarding the prompt adjustment of the state
budget of UKRAINE for 2012 in connection with the
organization of the European Football Championship
"EURO-2012" did not provide the necessary financing
for the tasks of implementing the state program of
economic and social development of UKRAINE for
2012.
The draft law "On State Strategic Planning for
2017" signed by the President of UKRAINE Petro
Poroshenko already included 11 principles of state
strategic planning: 1. Goal-setting; 2. Unity and
comprehensiveness; 3. Integrity; 4. Scientific validity;
5. Publicity and transparency; 6. Measurability; 7. Effi-
ciency; 8. Effectiveness; 9. Systematicity, continuity,
consistency and succession; 10. Flexibility; 11. Respon-
sibility.
But a comparative analysis of the principles of state
strategic planning of the draft laws of 2011 and 2017
indicates that the draft law of 2017 violates the
conceptual provisions of the Constitution of Ukraine
(1996). The formation of strategic plans for the socio-
economic development of UKRAINE on the basis of the
draft law of 2017 did not provide for the implementation
of a holistic socio-economic policy for the state without
observing national interests.
Due to the absence of the Law of Ukraine “On
State Strategic Planning”, the strategic socio-economic
V. Stolyarov, O. Shinkaryuk, V. Stolyarova, S. Vorobey
203
Економічний вісник Донбасу № 4(78), 2024 ISSN 1817-3772
development of the state and regions was envisaged on
the basis of the Law of Ukraine “On State Forecasting
and Development of Programs for the Economic and
Social Development of Ukraine” (dated 03/23/2000 No.
1602-ІІІ with clarifications on 05/17/2012 and
10/16/2012) for the following periods:
1) for 11 years – in 2001-2002, the strategic
forecast for 2004-2015 is presented by the Strategy for
the Economic and Social Development of Ukraine “On
the Path of European Integration” (the main forecast
macroeconomic indicators of Ukraine’s development
were considered at an expanded meeting of the Cabinet
of Ministers of Ukraine and the Presidium of the
National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine on
03/12/2004);
2) for 9 years – in 2006, in the State Strategy for
Regional Development for the period until 2015
(Government Resolution No. 1001 of 21.07.2006). This
is the only Strategy that defined priority areas, tasks and
measures for the development of each administrative
region, the city of Kyiv and the city of Sevastopol, with
the definition of a system of 24 indicators for
coordinating the activities of central and local executive
bodies and local self-government bodies regarding the
socio-economic development of the state and regions.
In the State Strategy for Regional Development for
the period until 2015, ensuring the development of
human resources as a strategic task was supposed to be
monitored and evaluated by a single criterion - the
Human Development Index. The following system of
indicators was defined as additional indicators: the level
of education of the population; the average monthly
income per capita; the number of registered crimes
(offenses, including among adolescents).
The state strategy identified priority areas and
measures for human resources development:
– ensuring high standards of training available to
employees throughout the entire period of their
production activity;
– intensifying cooperation in the field of education
and science;
– ensuring full employment of the working
population;
3) for 6 years – in 2014, in the State and Regional
Development Strategies for the period up to 2020
(Government Resolution No. 385 of 06.08.2014);
4) for 6 years – in 2015, in the Sustainable
Development Strategy “Ukraine-2020” (approved by
Decree of the President of Ukraine of 15.01.2015
No. 5). In the Strategy, the 17th indicator out of 25 was
defined as follows: “In 2020, the share of local budgets
will be at least 65% in the Consolidated State Budget”;
5) for 7 years – in 2019, in the State and Regional
Development Strategies for 2021-2027 (Government
Resolution No. 695 of 05.08.2020).
The achievement of strategic objectives was
envisaged by tactical measures for 3 years, which were
contained in the Action Plans for 2015-2017, 2018-2020
and 2021-2023 with the implementation of the State and
Regional Development Strategies for the periods until
2020 and 2027.
The Action Plan for 2015-2017 was approved by
Government Resolution No. 821 of 07.10.2015 (i.e.,
14 months after the approval of the Strategy). Indicators
for assessing the effectiveness of the implementation of
measures were given taking into account their forecast
values as of 01.01.2017 (only for 2016).
The list and level of annual indicators for 2014-
2020 of the Action Plan for 2018-2020 was approved by
Government Resolution No. 1089 of 20.12.2017
(10 days before the start of the implementation of
measures from 01.01.2018, but at the end of the third of
the six years of implementation of the Strategy).
The Action Plan for 2018-2020 was approved
by Government Resolution No. 733 of 12.09.2018
(8 months after the start of their implementation).
Action Plan for 2021-2023 on the implementation
of the State Strategy for Regional Development for
2021-2027 was approved by Government Order
No. 497-r. dated May 12, 2021 (8 months after the
approval of the Strategy) with the establishment of the
deadline for the development of Regional Development
Strategies for 2021-2027 - by October 1, 2021 (The
Ministry and other central government bodies, when
preparing their activity plans for 2021-2023, provided
funds for the implementation of the Action Plan within
the limits of the expenditures provided for in the state
budget for the relevant budget year. But why was the
role of local budgets and their ratio to the state budget
funds not taken into account?).
The lack of planning discipline for substantiation,
approval and delivery to executors and control of
measures for the implementation of medium-term
strategies and development plans for the state and
regions is due to the absence of the Planning Code of
Ukraine (of the same order of importance as the Civil,
Budget and Tax Codes of Ukraine) [4, p. 35].
The information and analytical materials of the
Strategic Plan of the Ministry of Economy of Ukraine
for 2022-2024 reported that the new draft law "On State
Forecasting and Strategic Planning of Economic and
Social Development" was sent to the Government on
February 28, 2022. The basis for the development of the
draft of this law was the 2nd task of the second goal of
the Strategic Plan of the Ministry of Economy of
Ukraine for 2022-2024 - Strategy for Reforming the
Public Finance Management System for 2022-2025.
(approved by Government Resolution No. 1805-r dated
29.12.2021).
The Strategy for Reforming the Public Finance
Management System for 2022-2025 identifies problems
that are due to the absence of the Law of Ukraine "On
State Strategic Planning".
The following were identified as the most relevant
among them:
– lack of a holistic strategic planning system, weak
connection between strategic planning, budget planning
and public investment planning;
V. Stolyarov, O. Shinkaryuk, V. Stolyarova, S. Vorobey
204
ISSN 1817-3772 Економічний вісник Донбасу № 4(78), 2024
– lack of full-fledged implementation of medium-
term budget planning;
– lack of a clear division of powers between
executive authorities and local self-government bodies;
– insufficient transparency and accountability
regarding the use of local budget funds;
– limited human resources capacity to implement
the reform at the central and local levels.
The result of the introduction of the ideology of
economic liberalism through the application of the
Anglo-Saxon model of an open market economy (i.e.,
with minimal state intervention in socio-economic
development) was anti-constitutional changes in the
basis and superstructure of Ukrainian society (compared
to the planned model of state formation of an
independent, sovereign and united Ukraine).
Results of the study of the cyclicity of regional
human development in Ukraine 2009-2017. Based on
the purpose and working hypothesis of the analytical
study, it is appropriate to define the following as the
initial, leading components of the methodological
support for measuring the Regional Human
Development Index (RHDI) in Ukraine:
1. According to the 2001 Methodology – the aspect
"Demographic development of regions of Ukraine" [3];
2. According to the 2012 Methodology – the block
"Population reproduction" [5].
The first aspect of measuring the RHDI
"Demographic development of regions of Ukraine" was
determined by 8 indicators:
1. Infant mortality rate, %;
2. Prenatal mortality rate, %;
3. Average life expectancy at birth (without
differentiation by sex), years;
4. Average life expectancy at age 15 (without
gender differentiation), years;
5. Average life expectancy at age 45 (without
gender differentiation), years;
6. Average life expectancy at age 65 (without
gender differentiation), years;
7. Migration balance, thousand people;
8. Migration intensity coefficient, %.
The second block of the RHDI measurement
"Population reproduction" was characterized by
5 indicators:
1. Total fertility rate (development stimulator);
2. Infant mortality of children under 5 years of age,
% (disincentive);
3. Average life expectancy at birth, years
(stimulator);
4. Probability of men to live from 20 to 65 years
(stimulator);
5. Probability of women to live from 20 to 65 years
(stimulator).
The national methodology for measuring the RHDI
in 2012 provided for monitoring and assessing the
impact of indicators on human development by
considering them as statistical characteristics: first,
indicators of stimulants and disincentives of human
development; second, determining and highlighting
their standardized values; third, clarifying the weight in
the structure of all components.
Rating assessments of the aspect "Demographic
development of regions of Ukraine" RHDI in 1999-
2011. show that the following administrative regions are
included in the top 10 places (except for Kyiv, which
has always taken first place in the republic): No. 1.
Ternopil, No. 2. Lviv, No. 3. Chernivtsi, No. 4. Ivano-
Frankivsk, No. 5. Vinnytsia, No. 6. Volyn, No. 7.
Poltava, No. 8. Khmelnytsky, No. 9. Kharkiv, No. 10.
Cherkasy.
Results of the rating assessment of the block
"Population reproduction" of the RHDI in 2004-2011.
determine the first 10 places from 24 administrative
regions as follows (since 2014 - 22 regions, excluding
Donetsk and Luhansk regions): No. 1. Ternopil, No. 2.
Lviv, No. 3. Chernivtsi, No. 4. Ivano-Frankivsk, No. 5.
Vinnytsia, No. 6. Volyn, No. 7. Poltava, No. 8.
Khmelnytsky, No. 9. Kharkiv, No. 10. Cherkasy.
There are reasons to state that the ahead ratings of
the above administrative regions in comparison with
other regions in the aspect of "Demographic
development of regions of Ukraine" in 1999-2011 and
the block "Population reproduction" in 2004-2017. the
RHDI measurement determined the future dynamics of
the RHDI rating estimates of the first ten administrative
regions of Ukraine as a whole.
That is, the cyclicality of the activation of human
development in the first 10 regions of Ukraine in 2012-
2017 was formed by positive trends in the indicators of
demographic development and population reproduction
in the regions in 1999-2011.
On the contrary, low indicators of demographic
development of the regions and population reproduction
in 1999-2017 were: 1. Donetsk, 2. Luhansk, 3. Zhy-
tomyr, 4. Kirovohrad, 5. Kherson regions. This, in the
rating estimates of the RHDI, led to their location in the
last 5 places out of 27 administrative-territorial entities
of Ukraine: 24 administrative regions, the Autonomous
Republic of Crimea, the city of Kyiv, the city of
Sevastopol.
In Donetsk region, due to the unfavorable
ecological situation and the state of the environment,
there was a reduction in life expectancy and high infant
and prenatal mortality, which became the main
problems of demographic development and population
reproduction. In addition, high population density was
superimposed on low housing provision and its comfort,
a lack of hospital beds and ambulance stations.
The Luhansk region was characterized by the
annual statistical bulletins "Regional Human Develop-
ment" throughout their entire period of publication
(2000-2017) with "unsatisfactory indicators of the living
conditions of the population – equipped housing, road
density and telephone coverage. The low education
index was influenced by the low level of children's
coverage of primary and basic secondary education".
V. Stolyarov, O. Shinkaryuk, V. Stolyarova, S. Vorobey
205
Економічний вісник Донбасу № 4(78), 2024 ISSN 1817-3772
In addition, the region had an unsatisfactory
demographic situation: negative migration indicators
and low average life expectancy. But, instead of
increasing the independence of local authorities by
introducing budgetary federalism not only for these
regions of the Ukrainian Donbas, but also for the rest of
the administrative regions of the state, its unprofessional
and irresponsible leadership contributed to the
emergence of social tension among the population of the
Luhansk and Donetsk regions and an immediate civil-
armed conflict between the local population and the
Center.
The reasons for the emergence of social tension
between the population of the Ukrainian Donbas and the
Center were not only the state leadership’s ignoring of
substantiated proposals from administrative districts and
regions to increase the regional and financial
independence of local authorities in the field of socio-
economic (including human) development, but also the
loss of jobs by the local population in the coal and
mining industries due to the mass closure of mines and
the growth of shift labor migration to the mines of the
Russian Donbas in the Rostov region.
The post-war implementation in Ukraine of the
advanced development of human potential in the socio-
economic space of the state should ensure the prevention
of depopulation of the nation, when the mortality rate of
the population will exceed the birth rate of infants, and,
instead, should contribute to an increase in the average
lifespan of humans.
The strategic term of such anticipation should be
equal to 20-25 years from the birth of a person (as a
living Sovereign of Ukraine) to the terms of his
formation as a citizen of a united, sovereign and
independent state. In November 1991, a meeting of
deputies of councils of various levels from the Eastern
and Southern regions of Ukraine was held in the city of
Donetsk with the participation of the State Minister for
Economy Volodymyr Gladush [6].
The meeting considered issues of federal-state self-
government based on the experience of Germany on
regional independence without the right to secede from
Ukraine, which were accumulated in the draft Program
of Denationalization in Ukraine. The draft Program of
New Regionalization of the Ukrainian Donbas was also
based on the experience of the United States in 1933,
when President Franklin Roosevelt adopted the Act on
Federal Management of the Tennessee River Valley, as
well as a number of American programs of recent
decades for areas with industrial decline.
The meeting adopted the appeal of the People's
Deputies of USSR to the Supreme Soviet of the
Ukrainian SSR and the Council of Ministers of Ukraine
with a draft Program for the creation of federal
structures in the East Ukrainian Economic Region. The
participants of the meeting noted the lack of prospects
for the development of cities and regions based on the
provisions of the concept of regional self-financing,
which was recognized as inappropriate in the conditions
of the transition of the national economy to a market
economy.
The program of denationalization in Ukraine
considered regions as a complex of administrative areas
related to geopolitical, historical, industrial and other
features of the interaction of its components.
In November 1992, in Ukraine, as an already
united, sovereign and independent republic-state, a
scientific and practical conference “Current Problems of
Territorial Management in Ukraine” was held (the
conference materials include the abstracts of the report
by Yu. E. Burykh on the topic “Prospects for a Federal-
Territorial System”) [7].
As the deputy chairman of the Gorlovka City
Council of People's Deputies and the chairman of the
Coordination Council of the Association of Mining Sites
of Donbas, in his report at the conference Yu. E. Burykh
announced proposals for territorial-territorial
delimitation and granting lands partial state powers.
First of all, in the sphere of legislative activity: at the
same time, it was not about national-state, but about
territorial federalism.
Support for the federal-territorial principle of the
state system of Ukraine was provided by the local
population: among 2,050 surveyed residents of the
Donetsk region, 86.6% supported the federal-territorial
system; in the rural Slavyanskyi district of the region,
among 642 respondents, 89%; in the city of Donetsk,
among 1,700 respondents, 97%.
In his speech Yu. Burykh emphasized that "We are
talking about real democratization of state life in
autonomous regions, about independent management,
about changing the style of managing territories – to
move away from central firefighting, occasional
treatment of the problems of the region to permanent,
systematic, secured by law and finances, regional and
local management. History, traditions, natural
environment, economy, ecology, social life -– all this is
specific to each region. Therefore, how to manage, what
forms of management to use, what problems to give
priority - all this should be decided by the region itself"
[7, p. 60].
Unfortunately, neither the ideas of the November
1991 and 1992 Meetings and Conferences, nor the
subsequent conceptual provisions and constructive
proposals of domestic scientists of social and economic
science regarding territorial federalism (and since
2012 – budgetary federalism) were realized by people's
deputies of all levels and heads of various branches of
government and did not become the basis of Ukrainian
statehood.
Despite the constitutional definitions of Ukrainian
land and subsoil as the property of the Ukrainian people,
in modern historical conditions in a sovereign and
independent republic, a Ukrainian land market for
foreign corporations has been introduced according to
the Anglo-Saxon model of an open market economy.
The nationwide referendum promised by the 6th
President of Ukraine regarding the introduction of
V. Stolyarov, O. Shinkaryuk, V. Stolyarova, S. Vorobey
206
ISSN 1817-3772 Економічний вісник Донбасу № 4(78), 2024
commodity-monetary relations in the implementation of
land reform with the recognition of a free land market
did not take place.
Today, a totalitarian-centralized system of
dictatorial, oligarchic-feudal governance has been
formed in Ukraine, which did not take into account the
recommendations and proposals of domestic economic
science and local authorities, but was oriented towards
meeting the requirements of foreign consultants from
the G7 countries (Great Britain, Germany, Italy,
Canada, France, Japan, led by the USA).
On the contrary, the use of recommendations and
proposals of domestic scientists of social and economic
science and local authorities on the restructuring of
territorial governance in the context of the transition of
the national economy to market relations in the early 90s
of the last century could in the future ensure the
avoidance of social outbreaks in the Autonomous
Republic of Crimea, Donetsk and Luhansk regions.
The main reason for the emergence of a
disappointing deadlocked historical cycle of the socio-
economic development of Ukraine was the deliberate
ignoring and discrediting of domestic experience in
directive-planned management of the national economy.
The implementation of the Anglo-Saxon model of
an open market economy with the active participation of
domestic agents of influence also did not provide for the
timely adoption of the laws of Ukraine “On the
administrative-territorial structure of Ukraine” and “On
state strategic planning”.
In November 2013 - February 2014, in Kyiv and
some regional cities of Ukraine, socially active citizens
took part in demonstrations against their own structures
of the Center and the Regions, led, as a rule, by
representatives of the Party of Regions.
In 2014, a ten-year historical cycle arose (after the
Orange Revolution of 2004) of the completion of the
irrational transition of consciousness and social status of
the Ukrainian people from the era of developed state
socialism of the late 80s of the last century according to
the Constitution of the Ukrainian SSR to the feudal-
oligarchic system of capitalist management, from a
directive-planned to a clan-corrupted market economy.
But the material basis of the socio-economic
(including human) development of the state should be
the national economy of Ukraine in the world economic
system, which was designed to facilitate the
implementation of the constitutional provisions of
socio-economic policy, measures of state-wide and
regional strategies and programs stipulated by the
Constitution of Ukraine of 1996 [8].
In the post-war period, in the conditions of
reforming local self-government bodies and territorial
organization of power, when justifying a new regional
map of the state, the procedures and results of a
comprehensive rating assessment of the components
and the overall IRLD can become arguments for
reformatting the socio-economic space and the
administrative-territorial structure of the state.
The average value of the IRLD in the variants of
grouping regions when reformatting the socio-economic
and territorial space of Ukraine can become an
additional criterion for forming a new regional map of
the state in accordance with the requirements of the
economic and statistical principles of the EU.
References
1. Novikova, O., Deіch, M., Pankova, O. et al. (2014). Diagnostika sostoyaniya i perspektivy razvitiya sotsial'noy otvetstvennosti
v Ukraine (ekspertnyye otsenki) [Diagnostics of the state and prospects for the development of social responsibility in Ukraine (expert
assessments)]. Donetsk, ІІЕ of NAS of Ukraine. 320 p. [in Russiаn].
2. Pro zatverdzhennia derzhavnoi tsilovoi prohramy vidnovlennia ta rozbudovy myru v skhidnykh rehionakh Ukrainy: Postanova
Kabinetu Ministriv Ukrainy vid 13 hrudnia 2017 r. № 1071/2017 [On the approval of the state military program for the restoration and
development of peace in the remote regions of Ukraine: Resolution of the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine dated December 13, 2017
No. 1071/2017.]. Retrieved from http://iplex.com.ua/doc.php?code=1071-2017-%D0%BF&red=1000030c14c37ae5ac
b6c2ceff7f6b955fedd9&d=5&st=0 [in Ukrainian].
3. Metodyka vymiriuvannia liudskoho rozvytku rehioniv Ukrainy. Dodatok do Postanovy «Pro metodolohichni zasady
vymiriuvannia liudskoho rozvytku dlia rehioniv Ukrainy» Kolehii Derzhkomstatu Ukrainy №182/76 vid 05.04.2001 r. ta Prezydii
NAN Ukrainy 14.03.2001 r. [Methodology for measuring human development in regions of Ukraine. Appendix to the Resolution “On
methodological principles for measuring human development for regions of Ukraine” of the Board of the State Statistics Committee
of Ukraine No. 182/76 of 05.04.2001 and the Presidium of the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine of 14.03.2001]. Retrieved
from https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/rada/show/v_182202-01 [in Ukrainian].
4. Stoliarova, V. V. (2021). Kontseptualno-analitychne zabezpechennia stratehichnoho planuvannia sotsialnoekonomichnoho
rozvytku derzhavy i rehioniv [Conceptual and analytical support for strategic planning of socioeconomic development of the state and
regions]. Visnyk ekonomichnoi nauky Ukrainy, 2 (41), рр. 33-49. DOI: https://doi.org/10.37405/1729-7206.2021.2(41).33-49 [in
Ukrainian].
5. Metodyka vymiriuvannia rehionalnoho liudskoho rozvytku: Rishennia Prezydii NAN Ukrainy ta kolehii Derzhavnoi sluzhby
statystyky Ukrainy vid 13.06.2012 r. № 123-m [Methodology for measuring regional human development: Decision of the Presidium
of the NAS of Ukraine and the Board of the State Statistics Service of Ukraine dated June 13, 2012 No. 123-m]. Retrieved from
http://www.ukrstat.gov.ua/druk/publicat/kat_u/2018/zb/09/zb_rlr2017_pdf.pdf [in Ukrainian].
6. Razghosudarstvlenye na Ukrayne: odna yz prohramm [Nationalization in Ukraine: one of the programs]. (1990).
Yezhenedel'nik «OriyentiR DiP» – Weekly “OrientiR DiP”, No. 40 [in Russian].
7. Burykh, Yu. E. (1993). Perspektyvy za federatyvno-zemelnym ustoroistvom [Prospects for a federal-land system]. Aktualni
problemy upravlinnia terytoriiamy v Ukraini [Actual problems of territorial management in Ukraine]: Proceedings of the Scientific
and Practical Conference. (pp. 58-62). Kyiv [in Russian].
V. Stolyarov, O. Shinkaryuk, V. Stolyarova, S. Vorobey
207
Економічний вісник Донбасу № 4(78), 2024 ISSN 1817-3772
8. Stoliarov, V., Ostrovetskyi, V., Stoliarova, V. (2024). Natsionalna metrolohiia tsyklichnosti rehionalnoho liudskoho rozvytku
v Ukraini (1999-2017 rr.) [National Metrology of the Cyclicity of Regional Human Development in Ukraine (1999-2017)].
Ekonomichnyi Visnyk Donbasu – Economic Herald of the Donbas, 3 (77), pp. 169-179. DOI: https://doi.org/10.129 58/1817-3772-
2024-3(77)-169-179 [in Ukrainian].
Столяров В., Шинкарюк О., Столярова В., Воробей С. Циклічність людиноцентриського розвитку України в
системі принципів державного стратегічного планування
В статті розглянуті концептуальні положення підвищення соціальної відповідальності центральних органів й
законодавчої і виконавчої влади України за підготовку, прийняття і виконання загальнодержавних рішень. Наведені приклади
порушення встановлених термінів доведення рішень до регіональних і місцевих органів влади.
Розгляд принципів державного і стратегічного планування законопроектів 2011 і 2017 років, як системо утворюючих
підстав державотворення, забезпечив виявлення першопричин порушення Конституції 1996 року як соборної, суверенної і
незалежної держави.
З’ясовані управлінські помилки на довгострокову перспективу та тактичні промахи в державотворенні. Головною
причиною виникнення циклічності людського розвитку регіонів визнано невміння центральних органів влади стратегічно
управляти українським суспільством.
Доведена необхідність формування планового кодексу України як комплексу стратегічних і тактичних
загальнодержавних рішень та базису підвищення соціальної відповідальності органів влади різних рівнів.
Побудова нової економіки оновленої держави орієнтована на забезпечення доцентрованості планових рішень суб’єктів
держави в ході цілеспрямованого впровадження єдиної загальнодержавної соціально-економічної політики.
Ключові слова: циклічність, принципи, людиноцентриський розвиток, доцентрованість, державотворення, регіональний
людський розвиток, державне стратегічне планування.
Stolyarov V., Shinkaryuk О., Stolyarova V., Vorobey S. Cyclicality of Human-Centered Development of Ukraine in the
System of Principles of State Strategic Planning
The article considers the conceptual provisions of increasing the social responsibility of central bodies and legislative and
executive authorities of Ukraine for the preparation, adoption and implementation of national decisions. Examples of violation of the
established deadlines for bringing decisions to regional and local authorities are given.
Consideration of the principles of state and strategic planning of draft laws of 2011 and 2017, as system-forming foundations of
statehood, ensured the identification of the root causes of the violation of the 1996 Constitution as a united, sovereign and independent
state.
Long-term management errors and tactical blunders in statehood were identified. The main reason for the cyclical nature of
human development in the regions is recognized as the inability of central authorities to strategically manage Ukrainian society.
The need for the formation of the Planning Code of Ukraine as a complex of strategic and tactical national decisions and the basis
for increasing the social responsibility of authorities of different levels is proven.
The construction of a new economy of a renewed state is focused on ensuring the centrality of planning decisions of state entities
in the course of the purposeful implementation of a single nationwide socio-economic policy.
Keywords: cyclicality, principles, human-centered development, centrality, state-building, regional human development, state
strategic planning.
Received by the editors: 21.11.2024
Reviewed: 09.12.2024
|