Non-Integrability of the Sasano System of Type ⁽¹⁾₅ and Stokes Phenomena

In 2006, Y. Sasano proposed higher-order Painlevé systems, which admit affine Weyl group symmetry of type ⁽¹⁾ₗ, = 4, 5, 6, …. In this paper, we study the integrability of a four-dimensional Painlevé system, which has symmetry under the extended affine Weyl group ˜(⁽¹⁾₅) and which we call the Sasano...

Повний опис

Збережено в:
Бібліографічні деталі
Опубліковано в: :Symmetry, Integrability and Geometry: Methods and Applications
Дата:2025
Автор: Stoyanova, Tsvetana
Формат: Стаття
Мова:Англійська
Опубліковано: Інститут математики НАН України 2025
Онлайн доступ:https://nasplib.isofts.kiev.ua/handle/123456789/212871
Теги: Додати тег
Немає тегів, Будьте першим, хто поставить тег для цього запису!
Назва журналу:Digital Library of Periodicals of National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine
Цитувати:Non-Integrability of the Sasano System of Type ⁽¹⁾₅ and Stokes Phenomena. Tsvetana Stoyanova. SIGMA 21 (2025), 020, 24 pages

Репозитарії

Digital Library of Periodicals of National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine
_version_ 1860272605285580800
author Stoyanova, Tsvetana
author_facet Stoyanova, Tsvetana
citation_txt Non-Integrability of the Sasano System of Type ⁽¹⁾₅ and Stokes Phenomena. Tsvetana Stoyanova. SIGMA 21 (2025), 020, 24 pages
collection DSpace DC
container_title Symmetry, Integrability and Geometry: Methods and Applications
description In 2006, Y. Sasano proposed higher-order Painlevé systems, which admit affine Weyl group symmetry of type ⁽¹⁾ₗ, = 4, 5, 6, …. In this paper, we study the integrability of a four-dimensional Painlevé system, which has symmetry under the extended affine Weyl group ˜(⁽¹⁾₅) and which we call the Sasano system of type ⁽¹⁾₅. We prove that one family of the Sasano system of type ⁽¹⁾₅ is not integrable by rational first integrals. We describe Stokes phenomena relative to a subsystem of the second normal variational equations. This approach allows us to compute in an explicit way the corresponding differential Galois group and therefore to determine whether the connected component of its unit element is not Abelian. Applying the Morales-Ramis-Simó theory, we establish a non-integrable result.
first_indexed 2026-03-21T11:56:45Z
format Article
fulltext Symmetry, Integrability and Geometry: Methods and Applications SIGMA 21 (2025), 020, 24 pages Non-Integrability of the Sasano System of Type D (1) 5 and Stokes Phenomena Tsvetana STOYANOVA Faculty of Mathematics and Informatics, Sofia University “St. Kliment Ohridski”, 5 J. Bourchier Blvd., Sofia 1164, Bulgaria E-mail: cveti@fmi.uni-sofia.bg Received November 28, 2023, in final form March 10, 2025; Published online March 27, 2025 https://doi.org/10.3842/SIGMA.2025.020 Abstract. In 2006, Y. Sasano proposed higher-order Painlevé systems, which admit affine Weyl group symmetry of type D (1) l , l = 4, 5, 6, . . . . In this paper, we study the integrability of a four-dimensional Painlevé system, which has symmetry under the extended affine Weyl group W̃ ( D (1) 5 ) and which we call the Sasano system of type D (1) 5 . We prove that one family of the Sasano system of type D (1) 5 is not integrable by rational first integrals. We describe Stokes phenomena relative to a subsystem of the second normal variational equations. This approach allows us to compute in an explicit way the corresponding differential Galois group and therefore to determine whether the connected component of its unit element is not Abelian. Applying the Morales–Ramis–Simó theory, we establish a non-integrable result. Key words: Sasano systems; non-integrability of Hamiltonian systems; differential Galois theory; Stokes phenomenon 2020 Mathematics Subject Classification: 34M55; 37J30; 34M40; 37J65 1 Introduction In 2006, using the methods from algebraic geometry Y. Sasano [27] introduced higher-order Painlevé systems, which have symmetry under the affine Weyl group of type D (1) l , l = 4, 5, 6, . . . . Subsequently Fuji and Suzuki [13] derived the higher-order Painlevé systems of type D (1) 2n+2 from the Drinfeld–Sokolov hierarchy by similarity reduction. These higher-order Painlevé systems have four essential properties: 1. They are Hamiltonian systems. 2. They admit an affine Weyl group symmetry of type D (1) l as Bäcklund transformations. 3. They can be considered as higher-order analogues of the Painlevé V and Painlevé VI systems. 4. They have several symplectic coordinate systems, on which the Hamiltonians are polyno- mial. In this paper, we study the integrability of the following fourth-order Painlevé system ẋ = 2x2y t + x2 − 2xy t − ( 1 + β t ) x+ α2 + α5 t + 2z((z − 1)w + α3) t , ẏ = −2xy2 t + y2 t − 2xy + ( 1 + β t ) y − α1, ż = 2z2w t + z2 − 2zw t − ( 1 + α5 + α4 t ) z + α5 t + 2yz(z − 1) t , mailto:cveti@fmi.uni-sofia.bg https://doi.org/10.3842/SIGMA.2025.020 2 Ts. Stoyanova ẇ = −2zw2 t + w2 t − 2zw + ( 1 + α5 + α4 t ) w − α3 − 2y(−w + 2zw + α3) t (1.1) with β = 2α2 + 2α3 + α4 + α5, where α0, α1, . . . , α5 are complex parameters, which satisfy the relation α0 + α1 + 2α2 + 2α3 + α4 + α5 = 1. The system (1.1) is one of the systems introduced by Sasano in [27]. It admits the extended affine Weyl group W̃ ( D (1) 5 ) as a group of Bäcklund transformations. For these reasons, throughout this paper we call the system (1.1) the Sasano system of type D (1) 5 or in short the Sasano system. The system (1.1) is a two-degree-of-freedom non-autonomous Hamiltonian system with the Hamiltonian H = HV (x, y, t;α2 + α5, α1, α2 + 2α3 + α4) +HV (z, w, t;α5, α3, α4) + 2yz((z − 1)w + α3) t , (1.2) where HV (q, p, t; γ1, γ2, γ3) is the Hamiltonian associated with the fifth Painlevé equation, i.e., HV (q, p, t; γ1, γ2, γ3) = q(q − 1)p(p+ t)− (γ1 + γ3)qp+ γ1p+ γ2tq t . Hence the system (1.1) is considered as coupled Painlevé V systems in dimension 4. The non- autonomous Hamiltonian system (1.1) can be turned into an autonomous one with three de- grees of freedom by introducing two new dynamical variables: t and its conjugate variable −F . The new Hamiltonian becomes H̃ = H + F, where H is given by (1.2). Then the extended Hamiltonian system (1.1) becomes dx ds = ∂H̃ ∂y , dy ds = −∂H̃ ∂x , dz ds = ∂H̃ ∂w , dw ds = −∂H̃ ∂z , dt ds = ∂H̃ ∂F , dF ds = −∂H̃ ∂t . (1.3) The symplectic structure ω is canonical in the variables (x, y, z, w, t, F ), i.e., ω = dx∧dy+dz ∧ dw + dt ∧ dF . In this paper, we are interested in the non-integrability of the Hamiltonian system (1.3). Recall that from the theorem of Liouville–Arnold [1] this means the non-existence of three first integrals f1 = H̃, f2, f3 functionally independent and in involution. We prove that the Sasano system (1.1) is non-integrable by rational first integrals. Our approach comes under the frame of the Morales–Ramis–Simó theory. This theory reduces the problem of integrabil- ity of a given analytic Hamiltonian system to the problem of integrability of the variational equation of this Hamiltonian system along one particular non-stationary solution. Since the variational equations are linear ordinary differential equations their integrability is well defined in the context of the differential Galois theory. The Morales–Ramis–Simó theory finds appli- cations in the study of non-integrability of a huge range of dynamical systems like N -body problems [4, 9, 16, 23, 35, 36], problems with homogeneous potentials [6, 10, 11], the Painlevé equation and their q-analogues [7, 12, 18, 31, 32, 33], the higher-order analogues of Painlevé sys- tems [34], as well as in the study of non-integrability of non-Hamiltonian systems [2, 5], in the Non-Integrability of the Sasano System of Type D (1) 5 and Stokes Phenomena 3 study of integrability in the Jacobi sense [15], in the study of the irreducibility of the Painlevé equations [8], etc. In this paper, we study the extended Sasano system (1.3) when α1 = α2 = α3 = 0, α4 = 1, α0 = −α5. It turns out that the differential Galois group of the first variational equations is a commutative group. To establish a non-integrable result, we find an obstruction to integra- bility studying the linearized second normal variational equations (LNVE)2, which is a linear homogeneous system of thirteen order. To determine the Galois group of such a higher-order lin- ear system, we find a subsystem of the (LNVE)2, whose Galois group can be computed explicitly. It turns out that this subsystem is a system with non-trivial Stokes phenomena at the infinity point. Computing the corresponding Stokes matrices we deduce that the connected component of the unit element of the differential Galois group of this subsystem and hence the Galois group of the (LNVE)2 is not an Abelian group. Then the key result of this paper (Theorem 3.11 in Section 3) states Theorem 1.1. Assume that α1 = α2 = α3 = 0, α4 = 1, α0 = −α5, where α5 is arbitrary. Then the Sasano system (1.1) is not integrable in the Liouville–Arnold sense by rational first integrals. Using Bäcklund transformations of the Sasano system (1.1), which are rational canonical transformations [28], we can extend the result of the key Theorem 1.1 to the main results of this paper (Theorems 4.6 and 4.7 in Section 4). Theorem 1.2. Let α be an arbitrary complex parameter, which is not an integer. Assume that the parameters αj are either of the kind ±α + nj or of the kind lj , nj , lj ∈ Z in such a way that 1− α0 − α1 and α4 + α5 are together of the kind ±α + mi, mi ∈ Z, i = 1, 2. Then the Sasano system (1.1) is not integrable in the Liouville–Arnold sense by rational first integrals. Theorem 1.3. Assume that all of the parameters αj, 0 ≤ j ≤ 5, are integer in such a way that 1−α0−α1 and α4+α5 are together either even or odd integer. Then the Sasano system (1.1) is not integrable in the Liouville–Arnold sense by rational first integrals. In fact, the result of Theorem 1.2 contains the result of Theorem 1.3. We present Theorem 1.3 as an independent result because of the additional specification of the quantities 1 − α0 − α1 and α4 + α5 when α ∈ Z. This paper is organized as follows. In the next section, we briefly review the basics of the Morales–Rams–Simó theory of the non-integrability of the Hamiltonian systems and the relation of the differential Galois theory to the linear systems of ordinary differential equations. In Section 3, we prove non-integrability of the Sasano system (1.1) when α1 = α2 = α3 = 0, α4 = 1 and α0 = −α5. In Section 4, using Bäcklund transformations of the Sasano system (1.1), we extend the result of the Section 3 to the entire orbits of the parameters αj and establish the main theorems of this paper. 2 Preliminaries 2.1 Non-integrability of Hamiltonian systems and differential Galois theory In this subsection, we briefly recall Morales-Ruiz–Ramis–Simó theory of non-integrability of Hamiltonian systems following [19, 20, 21, 22]. Let M be a symplectic analytical complex manifold of complex dimension 2n. Consider on M a Hamiltonian system ẋ = XH(x) (2.1) 4 Ts. Stoyanova with a Hamiltonian H : M → C. Let x(t) be a particular solution of (2.1), which is not an equilibrium point. Denote by Γ the phase curve corresponding to this solution. The first variational equations (VE)1 of (2.1) along Γ are written ξ̇ = ∂XH ∂x (x(t))ξ, ξ ∈ TΓM. (2.2) Using the Hamiltonian H, we can always reduce the degrees of freedom of the variational equa- tions (2.2) by one in the following sense. Consider the normal bundle of Γ on the level variety Mh = {x | H(x) = h}. The projection of the variational equations (2.2) on this bundle induces the so called first normal variational equations (NVE)1 along Γ. The dimension of the (NVE)1 is 2n− 2. Assume now that x(t) is a rational non stationary particular solution of (2.1) and let as above Γ be the phase curve corresponding to it. Assume also that the field K of the coefficients of the (NVE)1 is the field of rational functions in t, that is K = C(t). Assume also that t = ∞ is an irregular singularity for the (NVE)1. The entries of a fundamental matrix solution of (NVE)1 define a Picard–Vessiot extension L1 of the field K. This in its turn defines a differential Galois group G1 = Gal(L1/K). Then the main theorem of the Morales-Ruiz–Ramis theory states [19, 20, 22]. Theorem 2.1 (Morales–Ramis). Assume that the Hamiltonian system (2.1) is completely in- tegrable with rational first integrals in a neighbourhood of Γ, not necessarily independent on Γ itself. Then the identity component (G1) 0 of the differential Galois group G1 = Gal(L1/K) is Abelian. The problem considered in this paper is one among many examples illustrating that the op- posite is not true in general. That is if the connected component (G1) 0 of the unit element of the differential Galois group Gal(L1/K) is Abelian, one cannot deduce that the correspond- ing Hamiltonian system (2.1) is completely integrable. Beyond the first variational equations Morales-Ruiz, Ramis and Simó suggest in [22] to use higher-order variational equations to solve such integrability problems. Let as above x(t) be a particular rational non stationary solution of the Hamiltonian system (2.1). We write the general solution as x(t, z), where z parametrizes it near x(t) as x(t, z0) = x(t). Then we can write the system (2.1) as ẋ(t, z) = XH(x(t, z)). (2.3) Denote by x(k)(t, z), k ≥ 1 the derivatives of x(t, z) with respect to z and by X (k) H (x), k ≥ 1 the derivatives of XH(x) with respect to x. By successive derivations of (2.3) with respect to z and evaluations at z0, we obtain the so called k-th variational equations (VE)k along the solution x(t) ẋ(k)(t) = X (1) H (x(t))x(k)(t) + P ( x(1)(t), x(2)(t), . . . , x(k−1)(t) ) . (2.4) Here P denotes polynomial terms in the monomials of order |k| of the components of its ar- guments. The coefficients of P depend on t through X (j) H (x(t)), j < k. For every k > 1, the linear non-homogeneous system (2.4) can be arranged as a linear homogeneous system of higher dimension by making the monomials of order |k| in P new variables and adding to (2.4) their differential equations. If we restrict the system (2.4) to the variables that define the (NVE)1, the corresponding linear homogeneous system is the so called k-th linearized nor- mal variational equations (LNVE)k. The solutions of the chain of (LNVE)k define a chain of Picard–Vessiot extensions of the main field K = C(t) of the coefficients of (NVE)1, i.e., we have K ⊂ L1 ⊂ L2 ⊂ · · · ⊂ Lk, where L1 is above, L2 is the Picard–Vessiot exten- sion of K associated with (LNVE)2, etc. Then we can define the differential Galois groups G1 = Gal(L1/K), G2 = Gal(L2/K), . . . , Gk = Gal(Lk/K). Assume as above that t = ∞ is an irregular singularity for the (NVE)1 and therefore for (NVE)k for all k ≥ 2. Then the main theorem of the Morales-Ruiz–Ramis–Simó theory states the following. Non-Integrability of the Sasano System of Type D (1) 5 and Stokes Phenomena 5 Theorem 2.2 (Morales–Ramis–Simó). If the Hamiltonian system (2.1) is completely integrable with rational first integrals, then for every k ∈ N the connected component of the unit ele- ment (Gk) 0 of the differential Galois group Gk = Gal(Lk/K) is Abelian. From Theorem 2.2, it follows that if we find a group (Gk) 0, which is not Abelian, then the Hamiltonian system (2.1) will be non-integrable by means of rational first integrals. Note that this non-commutative group (Gk) 0 will be a solvable group. In this way, non-integrability in the sense of the Hamiltonian dynamics will correspond to integrability in the Picard–Vessiot sense. 2.2 Differential Galois group of a linear system of ordinary differential equations In this subsection, we briefly recall some facts, notations and definitions from the differential Galois theory, needed to compute the differential Galois group of a linear system with one irregular and one regular singularity. We follow the works of van der Put, Mitschi, Singer and Ramis [17, 24, 30, 37]. Throughout this paper, all angular directions and sectors are defined on the Riemann surface of the natural logarithm. Consider a linear system of ordinary differential equations of order n υ̇ = A(t)υ, (2.5) where A(t) ∈ GLn(C(t)). Definition 2.3. The differential Galois group G of the system (2.5) over C(t) is the group of all differential C(t)-automorphisms of a Picard–Vessiot extension of C(t) relative to (2.5). This group is isomorphic to an algebraic subgroup of GLn(C) with respect to a fundamental matrix solution of (2.5). Assume that the system (2.5) has two singular points over CP1 taken at t = 0 and t = ∞. Assume that the origin is a regular singularity while t = ∞ is a non-resonant irregular singularity of Poincaré rank 1. Denote by S the set of singular points of the system (2.5), that is, S = {0,∞}. If we replace in Definition 2.3 the field C(t) with the field of germs of meromorphic functions at a ∈ S, we define the so called local differential Galois group Ga of (2.5). In what follows, we present effective theorems for computing the local differential Galois groups Ga, a ∈ S of the system (2.5). Let Φ(t) be a local fundamental matrix solution near the origin of the system (2.5). The fol- lowing result of Schlesinger [29] describes the local differential Galois group at the origin of the system (2.5). Theorem 2.4 (Schlesinger). Under the above assumptions the monodromy group around the origin with respect to the fundamental matrix solution Φ(t) is a Zariski dense subgroup of the differential Galois group G of the system (2.5). Since we prefer to work with an irregular singularity at the origin to at t = ∞, we make the change t = 1/τ in the system (2.5). This transformation takes the system (2.5) into the system υ′ = A(τ)υ, ′ = d dτ , (2.6) for which the origin is a non-resonant irregular singularity of Poincaré rank 1. Denote by C(τ), C((τ)) and C{τ} the differential fields of rational functions, formal power series and convergent power series, respectively. Note that C(τ) ⊂ C{τ} ⊂ C((τ)). 6 Ts. Stoyanova In what follows, we determine the local differential Galois groups of the system (2.6) around the origin. From the Hukuhara–Turrittin theorem [38], it follows that the system (2.6) admits a formal fundamental matrix solution at the origin of the form Ψ̂(τ) = Ĥ(τ)τΛ exp ( Q τ ) , (2.7) where Λ = diag(λ1, λ2, . . . , λn), Q = diag(q1, q2, . . . , qn), Ĥ(t) ∈ GLn(C((t))) with λj , qj ∈ C, j = 1, . . . , n. Consider the system (2.6) and its formal fundamental matrix solution Ψ̂(τ) over the field C((τ)). Definition 2.5. With respect to the formal fundamental matrix solution Ψ̂(τ) from (2.7), we define the formal monodromy matrix M̂0 ∈ GLn(C) around the origin as Ψ̂ ( τ.e2πi ) = Ψ̂(τ)M̂0. In particular, M̂0 = e2πiΛ. Definition 2.6. With respect to the formal fundamental matrix solution Ψ̂(τ) from (2.7) we define the exponential torus T as the differential Galois group Gal(E/F ), where F = C((τ)) ( τλ1 , τλ2 , . . . , τλn ) and E = F ( eq1/τ , eq2/τ , . . . , eqn/τ ) . We may consider T as a subgroup of (C∗)n. The Zariski closure of the group generated by the formal monodromy matrix and exponential torus yields the so called formal differential Galois group at the origin of the system (2.6) (see [30, 37]). Consider now the system (2.6) over the field C{τ}. In general, the entries ĥij(τ), 1 ≤ i, j ≤ n of the matrix Ĥ(τ) in (2.7) are either divergent or convergent power series in τ . The existence of divergent power series entries in Ĥ(τ) ensures an observation of a non-trivial Stokes phenomenon at the origin. Definition 2.7. Under the above notations for every divergent power series ĥij(τ), we define a set Θj of admissible singular directions θji, 0 ≤ θji < 2π, where θji is the bisector of the maximal angular sector { Re ( qi−qj τ ) < 0 } . In particular, Θj = {θji, 0 ≤ θji < 2π, θji = arg(qj − qi), 1 ≤ i, j ≤ n, i ̸= j}. In order to compute the analytic invariants at the origin of the system (2.6), we have to lift the formal fundamental matrix solution Ψ̂(τ) from (2.7) to such an actual. To solve this problem, in this paper we utilize the summability theory. The application of the summability theory to ordinary differential equations generalizes the theorem of Hukuhara–Turrittin to the following theorem of Ramis [25]. Theorem 2.8. In the formal fundamental matrix solution at the origin Ψ̂(τ) from (2.7) the entries of the matrix Ĥ(τ) are 1-summable along any non-singular direction θ. If we denote by Hθ(τ) the 1-sum of the matrix Ĥ(τ) along θ, then Ψθ(τ) = Hθ(τ)τ Λ exp(Q/τ) is an actual fundamental matrix solution at the origin of the system (2.6). Non-Integrability of the Sasano System of Type D (1) 5 and Stokes Phenomena 7 Since this paper is not devoted to the summability theory, rather we only use it, we will not consider it in details. For the needed facts, notation and definitions, we refer to the works of Loday-Richaud [14], as well as the works of Ramis [24, 25]. Let ε > 0 be a small number. Let θ− ε and θ+ ε be two non-singular neighboring directions to the singular direction θ ∈ Θj . Let Ψθ−ε(τ) and Ψθ+ε(τ) be the actual fundamental matrix solutions at the origin of the system (2.6) corresponding to the directions θ− ε and θ+ ε in the sense of Theorem 2.8. Definition 2.9. With respect to the actual fundamental matrix solutions Ψθ−ε(τ) and Ψθ+ε(τ) the Stokes matrix Stθ ∈ GLn(C) related to the singular direction θ is defined as Stθ = (Ψθ+ε(τ)) −1Ψθ−ε(τ). The next theorem of Ramis [24] determines the differential Galois group at the origin of the system (2.6) over the field C(τ}. Theorem 2.10 (Ramis). The differential Galois group at the origin of the system (2.6) over C{τ} is the Zariski closure of the group generated by the formal differential Galois group at the origin and the collection of the Stokes matrices {Stθ} for all singular directions θ. For more details about the relation between the Stokes phenomenon and the differential Galois theory, we refer to the very recent work of Ramis [26]. We make note that one can introduce the differential Galois group at t = ∞ of the system (2.5) in the same way. Let t0 be a base point of CP1\S and let Σt0 denote an analytic germ of a fundamental matrix solution of (2.5) at t0. Let Ua, a ∈ S, be an open disc with center a, together with a local parameter ta at a, and such that Ua∩S = {a}. Let da be a fixed ray from a in Ua, together with a point ba ∈ da in Ua and a path γa from t0 to ba. Analytic continuation of Σt0 along γa and da provides an analytic germ Σa of fundamental matrix solution on a germ of open sector with vertex a, bisected by da. Let Ga be the local differential Galois group of the system (2.5) over the field of germs of meromorphic function at a with respect to Σa. If we conjugate elements of Ga by the analytic continuation described above, we get an injective morphism of algebraic groups Ga ↪→ G with respect to the representation of these groups in GLn(C) given by Σa and Σt0 , respectively. In this way all Ga, a ∈ S, can be simultaneously identified with closed subgroups of G. Then we have the following important result of Mitschi [17, Proposition 1.3]. Theorem 2.11 (Mitschi). The differential Galois group G of the system (2.5) is topologically generated in GLn(C) by the local differential Galois groups Ga, where a runs over S. 3 Non-integrability for α1 = α2 = α3 = 0, α4 = 1, α0 = −α5 In this section, we deal with the non-integrability of the Hamiltonian system (1.3) when α1 = α2 = α3 = 0, α4 = 1, α0 = −α5. Denote α = α5. For these values of the parameters the autonomous Hamiltonian system (1.3) becomes dx ds = 2x2y t + x2 − 2xy t − ( 1 + 1 + α t ) x+ α t + 2z(z − 1)w t , dy ds = −2xy2 t + y2 t − 2xy + ( 1 + 1 + α t ) y, dz ds = 2z2w t + z2 − 2zw t − ( 1 + 1 + α t ) z + α t + 2yz(z − 1) t , dw ds = −2zw2 t + w2 t − 2zw + ( 1 + 1 + α t ) w − 2y(−w + 2zw) t , 8 Ts. Stoyanova dt ds = 1, dF ds = 1 t2 (x(x− 1)y(y + t) + z(z − 1)w(w + t)− (1 + α)(xy + zw) + α(y + w)) − x(x− 1)y t − z(z − 1)w t . We choose x = z = α s , y = w = 0, t = s, F = 0 (3.1) as a non-equilibrium particular solution, along which we will write the variational equations. Because of the equation dt ds = 1, from here on we use t instead of s. For the first normal variational equations (NVE)1 along the solution (3.1), we obtain the system ẋ1 = ( −1 + α− 1 t ) x1 + ( 2α2 t3 − 2α t2 ) y1 + ( 2α2 t3 − 2α t2 ) w1, ż1 = ( −1 + α− 1 t ) z1 + ( 2α2 t3 − 2α t2 ) w1 + ( 2α2 t3 − 2α t2 ) y1, ẇ1 = ( 1− α− 1 t ) w1, ẏ1 = ( 1− α− 1 t ) y1. (3.2) Note that the (NVE)k, k ∈ N of the system (1.3) along the solution (3.1) are nothing but the (VE)k, k ∈ N, of the system (1.1) along the solution x = z = α t , y = w = 0 for α1 = α2 = α3 = 0, α4 = 1, α0 = −α5 = −α. The system (3.2) is solvable in quadratures and therefore its differential Galois group G1 is a solvable subgroup in GL4(C). Theorem 3.1. The connected component (G1) 0 of the unit element of the differential Galois group G1 of the (NVE)1 is Abelian. Proof. The (NVE)1 have two singular points over CP1: the points t = 0 and t = ∞. The ori- gin is a regular singularity while t = ∞ is an irregular singularity. The system (3.2) admits a fundamental matrix solution Φ(t) in the form Φ(t) =  e−ttα−1 0 −αett−α−1 −αett−α−1 0 e−ttα−1 −αett−α−1 −αett−α−1 0 0 ett−α+1 0 0 0 0 ett−α+1  . We will compute the Galois group G1 of the (NVE)1 with respect to this fundamental matrix solution. In this case, from Theorem 2.11, it follows that the differential Galois group G1 of the system (3.2) is generated topologically by the local Galois groups G0 and G∞, corresponding to the singularities t = 0 and t = ∞, respectively. Let us first determine the group G0. In a neighborhood of the origin, the above solution Φ(t) is written as Φ(t) = P (t)tA, Non-Integrability of the Sasano System of Type D (1) 5 and Stokes Phenomena 9 where P (t) is the holomorphic matrix P (t) =  e−t 0 −αet −αet 0 e−t −αet −αet 0 0 t2et 0 0 0 0 t2et  . For the constant matrix A we have that A = diag(α−1, α−1,−α−1,−α−1). From Theorem 2.4, it follows that the Galois group G0 over C(t) is generated topologically by the monodromy matrix M0 around the origin. With respect to the fundamental matrix solution Φ(t), we obtain M0 = e2πiA =  e2πiα 0 0 0 0 e2πiα 0 0 0 e−2πiα 0 0 0 0 e−2πiα  . When α ∈ Q but α /∈ Z, the group generated by M0 is not connected but it is a finite and cyclic group. In this case, G0 =   ν−1 0 0 0 0 ν−1 0 0 0 0 ν 0 0 0 0 ν  , ν is a root of unity  , (G0) 0 = {I4}, where I4 is the identity matrix. When α ∈ Z, we have that G0 = (G0) 0 = {I4}. When α /∈ Q, the group generated by M0 is a connected group and G0 = (G0) 0 =   ν−1 0 0 0 0 ν−1 0 0 0 0 ν 0 0 0 0 ν  , ν ∈ C  . Consider now the (NVE)1 and the fundamental matrix solution Φ(t) at t = ∞. In a neigh- borhood of the irregular singularity t = ∞, the matrix Φ(t) is written as Φ(t) = H1(t)t Λ1 exp(Q1t), where H1(t) is the holomorphic matrix H1(t) =  1 0 −αt−2 −αt−2 0 1 −αt−2 −αt−2 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1  . The matrices Λ1 and Q1 are given by Λ1 = diag(α− 1, α− 1,−α,−α), Q1 = diag(−1,−1, 1, 1). Since we do not observe non-trivial Stokes phenomena, the local Galois group G∞ is generated topologically by the formal monodromy M̂∞ and the exponential torus T∞. The formal mon- odromy corresponding to a loop around t = ∞ is nothing but (M0) −1, that is, M̂∞ = (M0) −1. Therefore, we can consider the local differential Galois group G0 at the origin as a subgroup of the local differential Galois group G∞ at t = ∞. Thus the Galois group G1 of the (NVE)1 10 Ts. Stoyanova coincides with the local differential Galois group G∞ at t = ∞. For the exponential torus, we have T∞ =  λ−1 0 0 0 0 λ−1 0 0 0 0 λ 0 0 0 0 λ  , where λ ∈ C∗. As a result, we find that when α ∈ Q the connected component (G1) 0 of the differential Galois group G1 coincides with T∞. When α /∈ Q the group (G1) 0 is generated by M̂∞ and T∞. Summarily, the group (G1) 0 is defined as (G1) 0 =   µ−1 0 0 0 0 µ−1 0 0 0 0 µ 0 0 0 0 µ  , µ ∈ C∗  , which is an Abelian group. ■ For the second normal variational equations (NVE)2 along the solution (3.1), we obtain the non-homogeneous system ẋ2 = ( −1 + α− 1 t ) x2 + ( 2α2 t3 − 2α t2 ) y2 + ( 2α2 t3 − 2α t2 ) w2 + x21 + ( 4α t2 − 2 t ) x1y1 + ( 4α t2 − 2 t ) w1z1, ẏ2 = ( 1− α− 1 t ) y2 − 2x1y1 + ( 1 t − 2α t2 ) y21, ż2 = ( −1 + α− 1 t ) z2 + ( 2α2 t3 − 2α t2 ) w2 + ( 2α2 t3 − 2α t2 ) y2 + z21 + ( 4α t2 − 2 t ) y1z1 + ( 4α t2 − 2 t ) w1z1, ẇ2 = ( 1− α− 1 t ) w2 − ( 4α t2 − 2 t ) y1w1 − 2w1z1 + ( 1 t − 2α t2 ) w2 1. Introducing more 9 new variables x21, x1y1, x1w1, w1z1, w 2 1, w1y1, y 2 1, z 2 1 , z1y1 and their dif- ferential equations, we extend the (NVE)2 to the (LNVE)2 [22]. The (LNVE)2 is a system of thirteenth order. The very high order of the (LNVE)2 make the problem of the description of its differential Galois group too complicated. Fortunately, it is not necessary to study the whole (LNVE)2. If we find a subsystem of (LNVE)2, for which the connected component G0 of the unit element of the corresponding differential Galois group is not Abelian and so is (G2) 0. For this reason, from here on we study the differential Galois group of the following fourth- order linear homogeneous system: ẇ2 = ( 1− α− 1 t ) w2 − 2p− ( 4α t2 − 2 t ) q + ( 1 t − 2α t2 ) v, ṗ = ( 2α2 t3 − 2α t2 ) q + ( 2α2 t3 − 2α t2 ) v, q̇ = 2 ( 1− α− 1 t ) q, Non-Integrability of the Sasano System of Type D (1) 5 and Stokes Phenomena 11 v̇ = 2 ( 1− α− 1 t ) v, (3.3) where we have denoted p := w1z1, q := y1w1, v := w2 1. The system (3.3) as the (NVE)1 has two singular points over CP1: t = 0 and t = ∞. The origin is a regular singularity, while t = ∞ is an irregular singularity of Poincaré rank 1. In order to determine the local differential Galois group at t = ∞ of the system (3.3), we make the change t = 1/τ . This transformation takes the system (3.3) into the system w′ 2 = ( α− 1 τ − 1 τ2 ) w2 + 2 τ2 p+ ( 4α− 2 τ ) q + ( 2α− 1 τ ) v, p′ = ( 2α− 2α2τ ) q + ( 2α− 2α2τ ) v, q′ = 2 ( α− 1 τ − 1 τ2 ) q, v′ = 2 ( α− 1 τ − 1 τ2 ) v, (3.4) where ′ = d dτ . Now the origin is an irregular singularity of Poincaré rank 1 for the system (3.4). We note that from here on we use the standard notations (a)n and (a)(n) for the falling and the rising factorials (a)n = a(a− 1)(a− 2) · · · (a− n+ 1), (a)0 = 1, (a)(n) = a(a+ 1)(a+ 2) · · · (a+ n− 1), a(0) = 1, respectively. Proposition 3.2. The system (3.4) possesses an unique formal fundamental matrix solution at the origin in the form Ψ̂(τ) = Ĥ(τ)τΛ exp ( Q τ ) , where the matrices Λ and Q are given by Λ = diag(α− 1, 0, 2α− 2, 2α− 2), Q = diag(1, 0, 2, 2). The matrix Ĥ(τ) is defined as Ĥ(τ) =  1 2 + φ̂(τ) 2τ ϕ̂(τ) 0 1 −ατ2 −ατ2 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1  . The elements φ̂(τ) and ϕ̂(τ) are defined as follows: 1. If α ∈ N, the function φ̂(τ) is the polynomial φ̂(τ) = 2(α− 1)τ + 2(α− 1)(α− 2)τ2 + · · ·+ 2(α− 1)!τα−1. (3.5) Otherwise, φ̂(τ) is given by the following divergent power series: φ̂(τ) = 2 ∞∑ n=1 (α− 1)nτ n. 12 Ts. Stoyanova 2. If α ∈ Z≤0, the function ϕ̂(τ) is the polynomial ϕ̂(τ) = τ + ατ2 + α(α+ 1)τ3 + · · ·+ (−1)−α(−α)!τ−α+1. (3.6) Otherwise, ϕ̂(τ) is given by the following divergent power series: ϕ̂(τ) = ∞∑ n=0 α(n)τn+1. Proof. The formulas p(τ) = C3 − C2αe 2 τ τ2α − C1αe 2 τ τ2α, q(τ) = C2e 2 τ τ2(α−1), v(τ) = C1e 2 τ τ2(α−1), where C1, C2, C3 are constant of integration, give the general solutions of the last three equations of the system (3.4). To build a local fundamental matrix solution Ψ̂(τ) at the origin, we use that each column of such a matrix is a solution of the system (3.4). Denote by Ψ̂j(τ), j = 1, 2, 3, 4, the columns of the matrix Ψ̂(τ). Then Ψ̂1(τ) =  ŵ (1) 2 (τ) 0 0 0  , where ŵ (1) 2 (τ) is a solution of the equation w′ 2 = ( α− 1 τ − 1 τ2 ) w2. We choose ŵ (1) 2 (τ) = e 1 τ τα−1. For the second column Ψ̂2(τ), we have Ψ̂2(τ) =  ŵ (2) 2 (τ) 1 0 0  , where ŵ (2) 2 (τ) is a formal solution of the equation w′ 2 = ( α− 1 τ − 1 τ2 ) w2 + 2 τ2 . (3.7) The equation (3.7) admits a formal solution near the origin in the form ŵ (2) 2 (τ) = 2 + 2 ∞∑ n=1 (α− 1)nτ n, which is a polynomial when α ∈ N. When α /∈ N, the solution ŵ (2) 2 (τ) is a divergent power series. For the next column, we have Ψ̂3(τ) =  ŵ (3) 2 (τ) −αe 2 τ τ2α e 2 τ τ2(α−1) 0  , Non-Integrability of the Sasano System of Type D (1) 5 and Stokes Phenomena 13 where ŵ (3) 2 (τ) is a solution of the equation w′ 2 = ( α− 1 τ − 1 τ2 ) w2 + 2αe 2 τ τ2α−2 − 2e 2 τ τ2α−3. We choose ŵ (3) 2 (τ) = 2e 2 τ τ2α−1 . For the last column Ψ̂4(τ), we have Ψ̂4(τ) =  ŵ (4) 2 (τ) −αe 2 α τ2α 0 e 2 τ τ2(α−1)  , where ŵ (4) 2 (τ) is a solution of the equation w′ 2 = ( α− 1 τ − 1 τ2 ) w2 − e 2 τ τ2α−3. (3.8) Looking for a solution of the equation (3.8) in the form ŵ (4) 2 (τ) = e 2 τ τ2α−3ĝ(τ), we find that ĝ(τ) must satisfy the equation τ2ĝ′ = (1− (α− 2))ĝ − τ2. (3.9) The equation (3.9) admits a formal solution near the origin in the form ĝ(τ) = τ ∞∑ n=0 α(n)τn+1, which is a polynomial when α ∈ Z≤0. Otherwise, ĝ(τ) is a divergent power series. Fitting together the so building columns Ψ̂j(τ), j = 1, 2, 3, 4, we complete the proof. ■ Now we can determine explicitly the formal invariants at the origin of the system (3.4). Proposition 3.3. With respect to the formal fundamental matrix solution Ψ̂(τ) introduced by Proposition 3.2, the exponential torus T and the formal monodromy M̂0 at the origin of the system (3.4) are given by T =   λ 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 λ2 0 0 0 0 λ2  , λ ∈ C∗  , M̂0 = e2πiΛ =  e2πiα 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 e4πiα 0 0 0 0 e4πiα  . The application of Definition 2.7 to the divergent power series φ̂(τ) and ϕ̂(τ) gives the fol- lowing sets of admissible singular directions: Θ2 = {θ = arg(0− 1) = arg(0− 2) = π} for the series φ̂(τ) and Θ3 = {θ = arg(2− 1) = arg(2− 0) = 0} for the series ϕ̂(τ). In the next lemma, we compute the 1-sums of the divergent power series φ̂(τ) and ϕ̂(τ). These 1-sums illustrate explicitly the dependence of the power series φ̂(τ) and ϕ̂(τ) on the suggested admissible singular direction. Denote a = Re(α) and by [|a|], [a] the integer parts of the real numbers |a| and a, respectively. 14 Ts. Stoyanova Lemma 3.4. Under the above notations, we have 1. Assume that α /∈ N. Then for every direction θ ̸= π the function φθ(τ) = 2(α− 1) ∫ +∞eiθ 0 (1 + ζ)α−2e− ζ τ dζ defines the 1-sum of the power series φ̂(τ) in such a direction. 2. Assume that α /∈ Z≤0. Then for every direction θ ̸= 0 the function ϕθ(τ) = ∫ +∞eiθ 0 (1− ζ)−αe− ζ τ dζ defines the 1-sum of the power series ϕ̂(τ) in such a direction. When Re(α) ≤ 2 (resp. Re(α) ≥ 0) the function φθ(τ) (resp. ϕθ(θ)) is a holomorphic function in the open unlimited disc Dθ = { τ ∈ C | Re ( eiθ τ ) > 0 } for any direction θ ̸= π (resp. θ ̸= 0). Otherwise, they are holomorphic functions in the open bounded disc Dθ(1) = { τ ∈ C | Re ( eiθ τ ) > 1 } . Proof. Consider the divergent power series φ̂(τ) and ϕ̂(τ) defined by Proposition 3.2. For the corresponding formal Borel transforms, we obtain the power series B̂1φ̂(ζ) = 2 ∞∑ n=0 (α− 1)n+1 ζn n! = 2(α− 1) ∞∑ n=0 (α− 2)n ζn n! , B̂1ϕ̂(ζ) = ∞∑ n=0 α(n) ζ n n! . Both of the series B̂1φ̂(ζ) and B̂1ϕ̂(ζ) are convergent near the origin of the Borel ζ-plane with finite radiuses of convergence. Therefore, both of the divergent series φ̂(τ) and ϕ̂(τ) are Gevrey series of order 1. The functions φ(ζ) = 2(α− 1)(1 + ζ)α−2, ϕ(ζ) = (1− ζ)−α present the sums of the power series B̂1φ̂(ζ) and B̂1ϕ̂(ζ), respectively. Consider the function (1 + ζ)α−2. We have that ∣∣(1 + ζ)α−2 ∣∣ = A|1 + ζ|Re(α)−2, where A = e−Im(α) arg(1+ζ). Let θ = arg(ζ). If Re(α)− 2 ≤ 0, then A |1 + ζ|2−Re(α) ≤ A when cos θ ≥ 0, while A |1 + ζ|2−Re(α) ≤ A | sin θ|2−Re(α) when cosα < 0. If Re(α)− 2 > 0, then A|1 + ζ|Re(α)−2 ≤ Be|ζ| Non-Integrability of the Sasano System of Type D (1) 5 and Stokes Phenomena 15 for an appropriate constant B > 0. Therefore, the function φ(ζ) is of exponential size at most 1 at ∞ along any direction θ ̸= π from 0 to +∞eiθ. Moreover, the function φ(ζ) is continued analytically along any such a direction. Then the corresponding Laplace transform (Lθφ)(τ) is well defined and gives the 1-sum of the divergent power series φ̂(τ) in such a direction. If we denote by φθ(τ) this 1-sum, we have that φθ(τ) = 2(α− 1) ∫ +∞eiθ 0 (1 + ζ)α−2e− ζ τ dζ for every θ ̸= π. From the above estimates, it follows that when Re(α)− 2 ≤ 0, the 1-sum φθ(τ) is a holomorphic function in the open unlimited disc Dθ = { τ ∈ C | Re ( eiθ τ ) > 0 } , (3.10) whose opening is π. When Re(α) − 2 > 0, the 1-sum is a holomorphic function in the open bounded disc Dθ(1) = { τ ∈ C | Re ( eiθ τ ) > 1 } (3.11) with opening < π. Using similar arguments, we find that for any direction θ ̸= 0 the Laplace transform ϕθ(τ) = ∫ +∞eiθ 0 (1− ζ)−αe− ζ τ dζ defines the 1-sum of the divergent power series ϕ̂(τ) in such a direction. When Re(α) ≥ 0, the 1-sum ϕθ(τ) is a holomorphic function in the disc Dθ from (3.10). Otherwise, the 1-sum is a holomorphic function in the disc Dθ(1) from (3.11). ■ Remark 3.5. Let I = (−π, π) ⊂ R and J = (0, 2π) ⊂ R. When we move the direction θ ∈ I, the holomorphic functions φθ(τ) glue together analytically and define a holomorphic function φ̃(τ) on a sector D̃1 with opening 3π, −3π 2 < arg(τ) < 3π 2 when Re(α) ≤ 2 or on a sector D̃1(1) = ⋃ θ∈I Dθ(1) with opening> π when Re(α) > 2. Similarly, when we move the direction θ ∈ J , the holomorphic functions ϕθ(τ) glue together analytically and define a holomorphic function ϕ̃(τ) on a sector D̃2 with opening 3π, −π 2 < arg(τ) < 5π 2 when Re(α) ≥ 0 or on a sector D̃2(1) = ⋃ θ∈J Dθ(1) with opening > π when Re(α) < 0. On these sectors, the functions φ̃(τ) and ϕ̃(τ) are asymptotic to the power series φ̂(τ) and ϕ̂(τ), respectively, in Gevrey 1-sense and define the 1-sums of these power series there. Their restrictions on C∗ are multivalued functions. In any direction θ ̸= π (resp. θ ̸= 0) the function φ̃(τ) ( resp. ϕ̃(τ) ) has only one value which coincides with the func- tion φθ(τ) (resp. ϕθ(τ)) defined by Lemma 3.4. Near the singular direction θ = π (resp. θ = 0) the function φ̃(τ) ( resp. ϕ̃(τ) ) has two different values: φ+ π (τ) = φπ+ε(τ) ( resp. ϕ+ 0 (τ) = ϕ0+ε(τ) ) and φ− π (τ) = φπ−ε(τ) (resp. ϕ − 0 (τ) = ϕ0−ε(τ)) for a small number ε > 0. 16 Ts. Stoyanova Replacing the divergent power series entries of the matrix Ĥ(τ) with their 1-sums, we get an actual fundamental matrix solution at the origin of the system (3.4). More precisely, denote F (τ) = τΛ exp (Q τ ) . Proposition 3.6. For every non-singular direction θ, the system (3.4) possesses an unique actual fundamental matrix solution at the origin in the form Ψθ(τ) = Hθ(τ)Fθ(τ), (3.12) where Fθ(τ) is the branch of the matrix F (τ) for θ = arg(τ). The matrix Hθ(τ) is given by Hθ(τ) =  1 2 + h12(τ) 2τ h14(τ) 0 1 −ατ2 −ατ2 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1  . The entries h12(τ) and h14(τ) of the matrix Hθ(τ) are defined as follows: 1. If α ∈ N, then h14(τ) = ϕθ(τ), where ϕθ(τ) is defined by Lemma 3.4 and extended by Remark 3.5. The element h12(τ) coincides with the function φ̂(τ) from (3.5). 2. If α ∈ Z≤0, then h12(τ) = φθ(τ), where φθ(τ) is defined by Lemma 3.4 and extended by Remark 3.5. The element h14(τ) coincides with the function ϕ̂(τ) from (3.6). 3. If α /∈ Z, then h12(τ) = φθ(τ), h14(τ) = ϕθ(τ), where φθ(τ) and ϕθ(τ) are defined by Lemma 3.4 and extended by Remark 3.5. Near the singular direction θ = 0 or θ = π, the system (3.4) possesses two different actual fundamental matrix solutions at the origin in the form Ψ+ 0 (τ) = Ψ0+ε(τ) and Ψ− 0 (τ) = Ψ0−ε(τ) or Ψ+ π (τ) = Ψπ+ε(τ) and Ψ− π (τ) = Ψπ−ε(τ), where Ψ0±ε(τ) and Ψπ±ε(τ) are defined by (3.12) for a small number ε > 0. Now we can compute the analytic invariants at the origin of the system (3.4). Theorem 3.7. With respect to the actual fundamental matrix solution at the origin, defined by Proposition 3.6, the system (3.4) has a Stokes matrix Stπ in the form Stπ =  1 µ1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1  . The multiplier µ1 is defined as follows: 1. If Re(α− 1) > 0, then µ1 = 4i(α− 1)(−1)α−1 sin((2− α)π)Γ(α− 1). 2. If Re(α− 1) ≤ 0 but α /∈ Z≤0, then µ1 = 4πi(α− 1)(−1)α−1 Γ(2− α) . Non-Integrability of the Sasano System of Type D (1) 5 and Stokes Phenomena 17 3. If α ∈ Z≤0, then µ1 = 4πi(−1)−α (−α)! . Similarly, with respect to the actual fundamental matrix solution at the origin, defined by Proposition 3.6, the system (3.4) has a Stokes matrix St0 in the form St0 =  1 0 0 µ2 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1  . The multiplier µ2 is defined as follows: 1. If Re(1− α) > 0, then µ2 = −2i sin((1− α)π)Γ(1− α). 2. If Re(1− α) ≤ 0 but α /∈ N, then µ2 = − 2πi Γ(α) . 3. If α ∈ N, then µ2 = − 2πi (α− 1)! . Proof. From the Definition 2.9, it follows that the multiplier µ1 is computed by comparing the solutions φ− π (τ) and φ+ π (τ). Denote J1 = φ− π (τ)− φ+ π (τ). Then J1 = 2(α− 1) ∫ γ (1 + ζ)α−2e−ζ/τdζ for π 2 < arg(τ) < 3π 2 , where γ = (π − ε) − (π + ε) for a small number ε > 0. Assume that α /∈ Z≤0. Then without changing the integral, we can deform the path γ into a Hankel type contour γ1 winding around the branch cut on R− of the function (1 + ζ)α−2, starting on −∞, encircling −1 in the positive sense and returning to −∞. Then J1 becomes J1 = 2(α− 1) ∫ γ1 (1 + ζ)α−2e−ζ/τdζ. The transformation 1 + ζ = u takes the contour γ1 into a Hankel type contour γ2 going along the branch cut on R− of the function uα−2, starting on −∞, encircling 0 in the positive sense and backing to −∞. Then we have J1 = 2(α− 1)e1/τ ∫ γ2 uα−2e−u/τdu. 18 Ts. Stoyanova Now the change u/τ = −η takes the contour γ2 into itself and we find that J1 = 2(α− 1)(−1)α−1τα−1e1/τ ∫ γ2 ηα−2eηdη. To obtain the formula for µ1, we use the well-known Hankel’s representation of the Gamma function Γ(1− α) and reciprocal Gamma function 1/Γ(α) when α ̸= 0,−1,−2, . . . as a contour integral (see [3, 1.6 (1) and 1.6 (2)])∫ γ2 η−αeηdη = 2i sin(απ)Γ(1− α), 1 2πi ∫ γ2 η−αeηdη = 1 Γ(α) . Hence φ− π (τ)− φ+ π (τ) = 4i(α− 1)(−1)α−1 sin((2− α)π)Γ(α− 1)τα−1e1/τ when Re(α− 1) > 0, and φ− π (τ)− φ+ π (τ) = 4πi(α− 1)(−1)α−1 Γ(2− α) τα−1e1/τ when Re(α− 1) ≤ 0 but α /∈ Z≤0. Assume now that α ∈ Z≤0. Then from the Cauchy’s differential formula it follows that φ− π (τ)− φ+ π (τ) = 4(α− 1)πi (1− α)! [ D1−α ζ ( e− ζ τ ) |ζ=−1 ] = 4πi(−1)−α (−α)! τα−1e 1 τ , where Dn ζ = dn dζn . In a similar manner comparing the solutions τ2α−2e2/τϕ− 0 (τ) and τ2α−2e2/τϕ+ 0 (τ), one can derive the multiplier µ2. ■ Now we can describe the local differential Galois group G at the origin of the system (3.4). Theorem 3.8. With respect to the formal and actual fundamental matrix solutions, given by Propositions 3.2 and 3.6, the connected component G0 of the unit element of the local differential Galois group G at the origin of the system (3.4) is defined as follows: 1. If α ∈ N, then G0 =   λ 0 0 µ 0 1 0 0 0 0 λ2 0 0 0 0 λ2  , λ ∈ C∗, µ ∈ C  . 2. If α ∈ Z≤0, then G0 =   λ µ 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 λ2 0 0 0 0 λ2  , λ ∈ C∗, µ ∈ C  . 3. If α /∈ Z, then G0 =   λ µ 0 ν 0 1 0 0 0 0 λ2 0 0 0 0 λ2  , λ ∈ C∗, µ, ν ∈ C  . Non-Integrability of the Sasano System of Type D (1) 5 and Stokes Phenomena 19 Proof. From Theorem 2.10, it follows that the local differential Galois group G at τ = 0 of the system (3.4) is the Zariski closure of the group generated by the formal differential Galois group and the Stokes matrices Stπ and St0. Since when α ∈ Z the formal monodromy M̂0 is equal to the identity matrix I4 then the formal differential Galois group coincides with the exponential torus T . Therefore, in this case G is generated by the exponential torus and the Stokes matrices Stπ and St0. Since when α ∈ N the Stokes matrix Stπ is equal to I4 the Galois group G is generated by the exponential torus T and the Stokes matrix St0. Hence for α ∈ N the differential Galois group coincides with its connected component G0 of the unit element and G = G0 =   λ 0 0 µ 0 1 0 0 0 0 λ2 0 0 0 0 λ2  , λ ∈ C∗, µ ∈ C  . Similarly, when α ∈ Z≤0 we have that G is generated topologically by T and Stπ and G = G0 =   λ µ 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 λ2 0 0 0 0 λ2  , λ ∈ C∗, µ ∈ C  . When α ∈ Q but α /∈ Z, the formal differential Galois group is not connected since the group generated by M̂0 is not connected. However, in this case the connected component of the unit element of the formal differential Galois group coincides with T . Therefore, in this case G does not coincides with G0 but G0 is generated by T and the Stokes matrices Stπ and St0. Hence G0 =   λ µ 0 ν 0 1 0 0 0 0 λ2 0 0 0 0 λ2  , λ ∈ C∗, µ, ν ∈ C  . In the last case when α /∈ Q, we have that G = G0 =   λ µ 0 ν 0 1 0 0 0 0 λ2 0 0 0 0 λ2  , λ ∈ C∗, µ, ν ∈ C  . This ends the proof. ■ Directly from Theorem 3.8, we obtain the following important result Theorem 3.9. The connected component of the unit element of the differential Galois group of the system (3.3) is not Abelian. Proof. If we prove that the connected component G0 of the unit element of the local differential Galois group at the origin of the system (3.4) is not Abelian group, then we will have that the connected component of the unit element of the differential Galois group of the system (3.3) will be not Abelian too. To prove that G0, defined by Theorem 3.8, is not an Abelian group it is enough to show that the matrices Tλ =  λ 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 λ2 0 0 0 0 λ2  and Sµ,ν =  1 µ 0 ν 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1  do not commute. 20 Ts. Stoyanova When µ and ν do not vanish together, the commutator between Sµ,ν and Tλ Sµ,νTλS −1 µ,νT −1 λ =  1 µ(1− λ) 0 ν ( 1− λ−1 ) 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1  is not identically equal to the identity matrix. The condition λ = 1 implies than for every σ ∈ G we have that σ ( e 1 τ ) = e 1 τ , i.e., e 1 τ ∈ C(τ), which is a contradiction. Thus the connected compo- nent of the unit element of the differential Galois group of the system (3.3) is not Abelian. ■ As a consequence of Theorem 3.9, we have the following. Corollary 3.10. The connected component (G2) 0 of the unit element of the differential Galois group of the (LNVE)2 is not Abelian. Proof. We always can put the independent variables in (LNVE)2 in such an order that the variables w2, w1z1, y1w1, w2 1 stay in a block. For example, let the system (3.3) forms the tail of the (LNVE)2. Then after the transformation t = 1/τ the (LNVE)2 admit such for- mal Ψ̂(LNVE2)(τ) and actual Ψθ (LNVE)2 (τ) fundamental matrix solutions at τ = 0 which contain the matrices Ψ̂(τ) and Ψθ(τ) from Propositions 3.2 and 3.6, respectively, as right-hand lower corner blocks. The differential Galois group G2 of the (LNVE)2 is a subgroup of GL13(C), so is (G2) 0. With respect to the fundamental matrix solutions Ψ̂(LNVE2)(τ) and Ψθ (LNVE)2 (τ) the con- nected component of the unit element (G2) 0 of G2 is not Abelian since it has a proper subgroup, which is not Abelian. ■ Combining Corollary 3.10 with the Morales–Ramis–Simó theory, we establish the main result of this section. Theorem 3.11. Assume that α1 = α2 = α3 = 0, α4 = 1, α0 = −α5, where α5 is arbitrary. Then the Sasano system (1.1) is not integrable in the Liouville–Arnold sense by rational first integrals. 4 Bäcklund transformations and generalization In this section with the aid of the Bäcklund transformations of the Sasano system (1.1), we extend the result of Theorem 3.11 to the entire orbit of the parameters αj , j = 0, . . . , 5, and establish the main results of this paper. Denote (∗) := (x, y, z, w, t;α0, α1, α2, α3, α4, α5). The action of the generators of the exten- ded affine Weyl group W̃ ( D (1) 5 ) on (∗) is defined as follows (see [27]): s0(∗) = ( x+ α0 y + t , y, z, w, t;−α0, α1, α2 + α0, α3, α4, α5 ) , s1(∗) = ( x+ α1 y , y, z, w, t;α0,−α1, α2 + α1, α3, α4, α5 ) , s2(∗) = ( x, y − α2 x− z , z, w + α2 x− z , t;α0 + α2, α1 + α2,−α2, α3 + α2, α4, α5 ) , s3(∗) = ( x, y, z + α3 w ,w, t;α0, α1, α2 + α3,−α3, α4 + α3, α5 + α3 ) , s4(∗) = ( x, y, z, w − α4 z − 1 , t;α0, α1, α2, α3 + α4,−α4, α5 ) , Non-Integrability of the Sasano System of Type D (1) 5 and Stokes Phenomena 21 s5(∗) = ( x, y, z, w − α5 z , t;α0, α1, α2, α3 + α5, α4,−α5 ) , π1(∗) = (1− x,−y − t, 1− z,−w, t;α1, α0, α2, α3, α5, α4), π2(∗) = ( y + w + t t ,−t(z − 1), y + t t ,−t(x− z),−t;α5, α4, α3, α2, α1, α0 ) , π3(∗) = (1− x,−y, 1− z,−w,−t;α0, α1, α2, α3, α5, α4), π4(∗) = (x, y + t, z, w,−t;α1, α0, α2, α3, α4, α5). (4.1) In fact, the actions sj , 0 ≤ j ≤ 5 define a representation of the affine Weyl group W ( D (1) 5 ) . Remark 4.1. When y = −t (resp. y = 0) is a particular solution of the Sasano system (1.1), then the parameter α0 (resp. α1) must be equal to zero. So, when y = −t (resp. y = 0), we consider the transformation s0 (resp. s1) as an identity transformation. Note that α1 = 0 does not imply y = 0 of necessity. For example, if α1 = 0, the function y = −t is a particular solution of the system (1.1), provided that α0 = 0. Next, when z = 0 (resp. z = 1) is a particular solution of (1.1), we find that α5 = 0 (resp. α4 = 0). This time we consider the transformation s5 (resp. s4) as an identity transformation. Note that α5 = 0 does not imply z = 0 of necessity. For example, when α5 = 0, the function z = t is a particular solution of the system (1.1), provided that α4 = −1 and y = − t 2 , w = 0 solve the same system. When w = 0, α3 = 0 we consider the transformation s3 as an identity transformation. Finally, when x = z, α2 = 0, the transformation s2 is considered as an identity transformation. Denote by V := (α0, . . . , α5) = (−α, 0, 0, 0, 1, α) the vector of parameters corresponding to the particular solution Sol := (x, y, z, w) = ( α t , 0, α t , 0 ) . In order to describe the orbit of the vector V under the action of the group W̃ ( D (1) 5 ) , we define using the ideas of Sasano the following translation operators: T1 = π1s5s3s2s1s0s2s3s5, T2 = π2T1π2, T3 = s1s4T1s4s1, T4 = s2s3T3s3s2, T5 = s1T4s1, T6 = s3T3s3. These operators act on the parameters as follows: T1(α0, α1, . . . , α5) = (α0, α1, . . . , α5) + (0, 0, 0, 0, 1,−1), T2(α0, α1, . . . , α5) = (α0, α1, . . . , α5) + (−1, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0), T3(α0, α1, . . . , α5) = (α0, α1, . . . , α5) + (0, 0, 0, 1,−1,−1), T4(α0, α1, . . . , α5) = (α0, α1, . . . , α5) + (1, 1,−1, 0, 0, 0), T5(α0, α1, . . . , α5) = (α0, α1, . . . , α5) + (1,−1, 0, 0, 0, 0), T6(α0, α1, . . . , α5) = (α0, α1, . . . , α5) + (0, 0, 1,−1, 0, 0). Note that the particular solution Sol is transformed under the transformations Tj as follows: T1(Sol) = ( α t − 1 t− α+ 1 , 0, α t − 1 t− α+ 1 , 0 ) , T2(Sol) = ( 1− 1 α− t+ 1 ,−1 + α α− t , 1− 1 α− t+ 1 , 0 ) , T3(Sol) = (1, 0, 1,−t+ α− 1), T4(Sol) = ( 1,−t+ α− 1, 1− 1 t− α+ 1 , 0 ) , T5(Sol) = ( 1− 1 t− α+ 1 ,−t+ α− 1, 1− 1 t− α+ 1 , 0 ) , 22 Ts. Stoyanova T6(Sol) = ( 1, 0, 1− 1 t− α+ 1 ,−t+ α− 1 ) . Note also that from Remark 4.1 it follows that all of the Bäcklund transformations (4.1) make sense for the particular solution Sol. Denote M1 = 1 − α0 − α1, M2 = α4 + α5. The next two lemmas describe the orbit of the vector V under the group W̃ ( D (1) 5 ) with generators (4.1). Lemma 4.2. Assume that α /∈ Z. Let (x, y, z, t) = ( α t , 0, α t , 0 ) be a particular rational solution of the Sasano system (1.1) with vector of parameters V . Then applying Bäcklund transforma- tions (4.1) to this solution, we obtain rational solutions of (1.1) with parameters αj, 0 ≤ j ≤ 5, which are either of the kind ±α + nj, nj ∈ Z or of the kind lj, lj ∈ Z in such a way that M1 and M2 are together of the kind ±α+mj, mj ∈ Z, j = 1, 2. Proof. This lemma is proved by an induction on the numbers of the applied transforma- tions (4.1) on the vector V and with the aid of above translation operators Tj , 1 ≤ j ≤ 6. ■ Remark 4.3. The conditions imposed on the parameters αj by Lemma 4.2 ensure that when α /∈ Z, at least two of the new-obtained parameters αj are integer numbers and at least two of them are not integer numbers. With the next lemma, we specify the orbit of the vector V when α ∈ Z. Lemma 4.4. Assume that α ∈ Z. Let (x, y, z, t) = ( α t , 0, α t , 0 ) be a particular rational solution of the Sasano system (1.1) with vector of parameters V . Then applying Bäcklund transforma- tions (4.1) to this solution we obtain rational solutions of (1.1), for which all of the parame- ters αj, 0 ≤ j ≤ 5, are integer numbers in such a way that M1 and M2 are together either even or odd integer. Proof. This lemma is proved inductively. ■ Following [28], we define the symplectic transformations ri, 0 ≤ i ≤ 5, which correspond to the symmetries si, 0 ≤ i ≤ 5, from (4.1) r0(x, y, z, w) = ( 1 x ,−t− x(x(y + t) + α0), z, w ) , r1(x, y, z, w) = ( 1 x ,−x(xy + α1), z, w ) , r2(x, y, z, w) = ( z − y(y(x− z)− α2), 1 y , z, w + y − 1 y ) , r3(x, y, z, w) = ( x, y, 1 z ,−z(zw + α3) ) , r4(x, y, z, w) = ( x, y, 1− w(w(z − 1)− α4), 1 w ) , r5(x, y, z, w) = ( x, y,−w(wz − α5), 1 w ) . The transformations πj , 1 ≤ j ≤ 5, from (4.1) are also canonical symplectic transformations since dx ∧ dy + dz ∧ dw = dπj(x) ∧ dπj(y) + dπj(z) ∧ dπj(w). Denote, in short, by ri, 0 ≤ i ≤ 5, and πj , 1 ≤ j ≤ 4, the image of the canonical coordi- nates x, y, z, w under the action of ri and πj , respectively. Then the following important result is an extension of [28, Theorem 4.1]. Non-Integrability of the Sasano System of Type D (1) 5 and Stokes Phenomena 23 Theorem 4.5. There exists an unique polynomial Hamiltonian system of degree 4, which is holomorphic in each coordinates ri, 0 ≤ i ≤ 5, and πj, 1 ≤ j ≤ 5. This system is invariant under the extended Weyl group W̃ ( D (1) 5 ) and coincides with the system (1.1). Theorem 4.5 says that the transformations si, 0 ≤ i ≤ 5, and πj , 1 ≤ j ≤ 4, from (4.1) are canonical transformations, which are rational on the functions x, y, z, w. Using this fact, we establish the main results of this paper. Theorem 4.6. Let α be an arbitrary complex parameter, which is not an integer. Assume that the parameters αj are either of the kind ±α+nj or of the kind lj , nj , lj ∈ Z in such a way that M1 and M2 are together of the kind ±α + mi, mi ∈ Z, i = 1, 2. Then the Sasano system (1.1) is not integrable in the Liouville–Arnold sense by rational first integrals. Theorem 4.7. Assume that all of the parameters αj, 0 ≤ j ≤ 5, are integer in such a way that M1 and M2 are together either even or odd integer. Then the Sasano system (1.1) is not integrable in the Liouville–Arnold sense by rational first integrals. Acknowledgments The author is indebted to the referees for critical remarks and advices towards the improvement of the paper. The author was partially supported by Grant KP-06-N 62/5 of the Bulgarian Fund “Scientific research”. References [1] Arnol’d V.I., Mathematical methods of classical mechanics, Grad. Texts in Math., Vol. 60, Springer, New York, 1989. [2] Ayoul M., Zung N.T., Galoisian obstructions to non-Hamiltonian integrability, C. R. Math. Acad. Sci. Paris 348 (2010), 1323–1326, arXiv:0901.4586. [3] Bateman H., Erdélyi A., Higher transcendental functions. Vol. I, McGraw-Hill Book Co., Inc., New York, 1953. [4] Boucher D., Weil J.-A., Application of J.-J. Morales and J.-P. Ramis’ theorem to test the non-complete intagrability of the planar three-body problem, in From Combinatorics to Dynamical Systems, De Gruyter, Berlin, 2003, 163–178. [5] Casale G., Morales–Ramis theorems via Malgrange pseudogroup, Ann. Inst. Fourier (Grenoble) 59 (2009), 2593–2610. [6] Casale G., Duval G., Maciejewski A.J., Przybylska M., Integrability of Hamiltonian systems with homoge- neous potentials of degree zero, Phys. Lett. A 374 (2010), 448–452, arXiv:0903.5199. [7] Casale G., Roques J., Non-integrability by discrete quadratures, J. Reine Angew. Math. 687 (2014), 87–112. [8] Casale G., Weil J.A., Galoisian methods for testing irreducibility of order two nonlinear differential equations, Pacific J. Math. 297 (2018), 299–337, arXiv:1504.08134. [9] Combot T., Non-integrability of the equal mass n-body problem with non-zero angular momentum, Celestial Mech. Dynam. Astronom. 114 (2012), 319–340, arXiv:1112.1889. [10] Combot T., Integrable planar homogeneous potentials of degree −1 with small eigenvalues, Ann. Inst. Fourier (Grenoble) 66 (2016), 2253–2298. [11] Combot T., Maciejewski A.J., Przybylska M., Bi-homogeneity and integrability of rational potentials, J. Dif- ferential Equations 268 (2020), 7012–7028. [12] Filipuk G., A remark about quasi-Painlevé equations of PII type, C. R. Acad. Bulgare Sci. 68 (2015), 427–430. [13] Fuji K., Suzuki T., Higher order Painlevé system of type D (1) 2n+2 arising from integrable hierarchy, Int. Math. Res. Not. 2008 (2008), 129, 21 pages, arXiv:0704.2574. [14] Loday-Richaud M., Divergent series, summability and resurgence. II. Simple and multiple summability, Lecture Notes in Math., Vol. 2154, Springer, Cham, 2016. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-2063-1 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crma.2010.10.024 https://arxiv.org/abs/0901.4586 https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110200003.163 https://doi.org/10.5802/aif.2501 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physleta.2009.11.018 https://arxiv.org/abs/0903.5199 https://doi.org/10.1515/crelle-2012-0054 https://doi.org/10.2140/pjm.2018.297.299 https://arxiv.org/abs/1504.08134 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10569-012-9417-z https://doi.org/10.1007/s10569-012-9417-z https://arxiv.org/abs/1112.1889 https://doi.org/10.5802/aif.3063 https://doi.org/10.5802/aif.3063 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jde.2019.11.074 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jde.2019.11.074 https://doi.org/10.1093/imrn/rnm129 https://doi.org/10.1093/imrn/rnm129 https://arxiv.org/abs/0704.2574 https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-29075-1 24 Ts. Stoyanova [15] Maciejewski A.J., Przybylska M., Gyrostatic Suslov problem, Russ. J. Nonlinear Dyn. 18 (2022), 609–627. [16] Maciejewski A.J., Przybylska M., Simpson L., Szumiński W., Non-integrability of the dumbbell and point mass problem, Celestial Mech. Dynam. Astronom. 117 (2013), 315–330, arXiv:1304.6369. [17] Mitschi C., Differential Galois groups of confluent generalized hypergeometric equations: an approach using Stokes multipliers, Pacific J. Math. 176 (1996), 365–405. [18] Morales-Ruiz J.J., A remark about the Painlevé transcendents, in Théories Asymptotiques et Équations de Painlevé, Sémin. Congr., Vol. 14, Soc. Math. France, Paris, 2006, 229–235. [19] Morales-Ruiz J.J., Ramis J.-P., Galoisian obstructions to integrability of Hamiltonian systems. I, Methods Appl. Anal. 8 (2001), 33–96. [20] Morales-Ruiz J.J., Ramis J.-P., Galoisian obstructions to integrability of Hamiltonian systems. II, Methods Appl. Anal. 8 (2001), 97–112. [21] Morales-Ruiz J.J., Ramis J.-P., Integrability of dynamical systems through differential Galois theory: a prac- tical guide, in Differential Algebra, Complex Analysis and Orthogonal Polynomials, Contemp. Math., Vol. 509, American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI, 2010, 143–220. [22] Morales-Ruiz J.J., Ramis J.-P., Simo C., Integrability of Hamiltonian systems and differential Galois groups of higher variational equations, Ann. Sci. École Norm. Sup. 40 (2007), 845–884. [23] Przybylska M., Maciejewski A.J., Non-integrability of the planar elliptic restricted three-body problem, Celestial Mech. Dynam. Astronom. 135 (2023), 13, 22 pages. [24] Ramis J.-P., Phénomène de Stokes et filtration Gevrey sur le groupe de Picard–Vessiot, C. R. Acad. Sci. Paris Sér. I Math. 301 (1985), 165–167. [25] Ramis J.-P., Gevrey asymptotics and applications to holomorphic ordinary differential equations, in Dif- ferential Equations & Asymptotic Theory in Mathematical Physics, Ser. Anal., Vol. 2, World Scientific Publishing, Hackensack, NJ, 2004, 44–99. [26] Ramis J.-P., Epilogue: Stokes phenomena. Dynamics, classification problems and avatars, in Handbook of Geometry and Topology of Singularities VI: Foliations, Springer, Cham, 2024, 383–482. [27] Sasano Y., Higher order Painlevé equations of type D (1) l , in From Soliton Theory to a Mathematics of Inte- grable Systems: “New Perspectives”, RIMS Kôkyûroku Bessatsu, Vol. 1473, Res. Inst. Math. Sci. (RIMS), Kyoto, 2006, 143–163. [28] Sasano Y., Yamada Y., Symmetry and holomorphy of Painlevé type systems, in Algebraic, Analytic and Geometric Aspects of Complex Differential Equations and Their Deformations. Painlevé Hierarchies, RIMS Kôkyûroku Bessatsu, Vol. B2, Res. Inst. Math. Sci. (RIMS), Kyoto, 2007, 215–225. [29] Schlesinger L., Handbuch der Theorie der linearen Differentialgleichungen, Teubner, Leipzig, 1897. [30] Singer M.F., Introduction to the Galois theory of linear differential equations, in Algebraic Theory of Differ- ential Equations, London Math. Soc. Lecture Note Ser., Vol. 357, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2009, 1–82, arXiv:0712.4124. [31] Stoyanova Ts., Non-integrability of Painlevé VI equations in the Liouville sense, Nonlinearity 22 (2009), 2201–2230. [32] Stoyanova Ts., Non-integrability of the fourth Painlevé equation in the Liouville–Arnold sense, Nonlinearity 27 (2014), 1029–1044. [33] Stoyanova Ts., Nonintegrability of the Painlevé IV equation in the Liouville–Arnold sense and Stokes phe- nomena, Stud. Appl. Math. 151 (2023), 1380–1405, arXiv:2302.13732. [34] Stoyanova Ts., Nonintegrability of coupled Painlevé systems with affine Weyl group symmetry of type A (2) 4 , Eur. J. Math. 10 (2024), 62, 15 pages. [35] Tsygvintsev A., The meromorphic non-integrability of the three-body problem, J. Reine Angew. Math. 537 (2001), 127–149, arXiv:math.DS/0009218. [36] Tsygvintsev A., On some exceptional cases in the integrability of the three-body problem, Celestial Mech. Dynam. Astronom. 99 (2007), 23–29, arXiv:math.DS/0610951. [37] van der Put M., Singer M.F., Galois theory of linear differential equations, Grundlehren Math. Wiss., Vol. 328, Springer, Berlin, 2003. [38] WasowW., Asymptotic expansions for ordinary differential equations, Pure Appl. Math., Vol. 14, Interscience Publishers John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York, 1965. https://doi.org/10.20537/nd221210 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10569-013-9514-7 https://arxiv.org/abs/1304.6369 https://doi.org/10.2140/pjm.1996.176.365 https://doi.org/10.4310/MAA.2001.v8.n1.a3 https://doi.org/10.4310/MAA.2001.v8.n1.a3 https://doi.org/10.4310/MAA.2001.v8.n1.a4 https://doi.org/10.4310/MAA.2001.v8.n1.a4 https://doi.org/10.1090/conm/509/09980 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ansens.2007.09.002 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10569-022-10120-5 https://doi.org/10.1142/9789812702395_0002 https://doi.org/10.1142/9789812702395_0002 https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-54172-8_10 https://arxiv.org/abs/0712.4124 https://doi.org/10.1088/0951-7715/22/9/008 https://doi.org/10.1088/0951-7715/27/5/1029 https://doi.org/10.1111/sapm.12629 https://arxiv.org/abs/2302.13732 https://doi.org/10.1007/s40879-024-00781-x https://doi.org/10.1515/crll.2001.061 https://arxiv.org/abs/math.DS/0009218 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10569-007-9086-5 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10569-007-9086-5 https://arxiv.org/abs/math.DS/0610951 https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-55750-7 1 Introduction 2 Preliminaries 2.1 Non-integrability of Hamiltonian systems and differential Galois theory 2.2 Differential Galois group of a linear system of ordinary differential equations 3 Non-integrability for alpha_1=alpha_2=alpha_3=0, alpha_4=1, alpha_0=-alpha_5 4 Bäcklund transformations and generalization References
id nasplib_isofts_kiev_ua-123456789-212871
institution Digital Library of Periodicals of National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine
issn 1815-0659
language English
last_indexed 2026-03-21T11:56:45Z
publishDate 2025
publisher Інститут математики НАН України
record_format dspace
spelling Stoyanova, Tsvetana
2026-02-13T13:48:53Z
2025
Non-Integrability of the Sasano System of Type ⁽¹⁾₅ and Stokes Phenomena. Tsvetana Stoyanova. SIGMA 21 (2025), 020, 24 pages
1815-0659
2020 Mathematics Subject Classification: 34M55; 37J30; 34M40; 37J65
arXiv:2306.07062
https://nasplib.isofts.kiev.ua/handle/123456789/212871
https://doi.org/10.3842/SIGMA.2025.020
In 2006, Y. Sasano proposed higher-order Painlevé systems, which admit affine Weyl group symmetry of type ⁽¹⁾ₗ, = 4, 5, 6, …. In this paper, we study the integrability of a four-dimensional Painlevé system, which has symmetry under the extended affine Weyl group ˜(⁽¹⁾₅) and which we call the Sasano system of type ⁽¹⁾₅. We prove that one family of the Sasano system of type ⁽¹⁾₅ is not integrable by rational first integrals. We describe Stokes phenomena relative to a subsystem of the second normal variational equations. This approach allows us to compute in an explicit way the corresponding differential Galois group and therefore to determine whether the connected component of its unit element is not Abelian. Applying the Morales-Ramis-Simó theory, we establish a non-integrable result.
The author is indebted to the referees for their critical remarks and advice towards the improvement of the paper. The author was partially supported by Grant KP-06-N 62/5 of the Bulgarian Fund “Scientific research”.
en
Інститут математики НАН України
Symmetry, Integrability and Geometry: Methods and Applications
Non-Integrability of the Sasano System of Type ⁽¹⁾₅ and Stokes Phenomena
Article
published earlier
spellingShingle Non-Integrability of the Sasano System of Type ⁽¹⁾₅ and Stokes Phenomena
Stoyanova, Tsvetana
title Non-Integrability of the Sasano System of Type ⁽¹⁾₅ and Stokes Phenomena
title_full Non-Integrability of the Sasano System of Type ⁽¹⁾₅ and Stokes Phenomena
title_fullStr Non-Integrability of the Sasano System of Type ⁽¹⁾₅ and Stokes Phenomena
title_full_unstemmed Non-Integrability of the Sasano System of Type ⁽¹⁾₅ and Stokes Phenomena
title_short Non-Integrability of the Sasano System of Type ⁽¹⁾₅ and Stokes Phenomena
title_sort non-integrability of the sasano system of type ⁽¹⁾₅ and stokes phenomena
url https://nasplib.isofts.kiev.ua/handle/123456789/212871
work_keys_str_mv AT stoyanovatsvetana nonintegrabilityofthesasanosystemoftype15andstokesphenomena