Unobstructed Immersed Lagrangian Correspondence and Filtered ∞ Functor
In this paper, we 'construct' a 2-functor from the unobstructed immersed Weinstein category to the category of all filtered ∞ categories. We consider arbitrary (compact) symplectic manifolds and their arbitrary (relatively spin) immersed Lagrangian submanifolds. The filtered ∞ category ass...
Saved in:
| Published in: | Symmetry, Integrability and Geometry: Methods and Applications |
|---|---|
| Date: | 2025 |
| Main Author: | |
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Інститут математики НАН України
2025
|
| Online Access: | https://nasplib.isofts.kiev.ua/handle/123456789/213183 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| Journal Title: | Digital Library of Periodicals of National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine |
| Cite this: | Unobstructed Immersed Lagrangian Correspondence and Filtered ∞ Functor. Kenji Fukaya. SIGMA 21 (2025), 031, 284 pages |
Institution
Digital Library of Periodicals of National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine| Summary: | In this paper, we 'construct' a 2-functor from the unobstructed immersed Weinstein category to the category of all filtered ∞ categories. We consider arbitrary (compact) symplectic manifolds and their arbitrary (relatively spin) immersed Lagrangian submanifolds. The filtered ∞ category associated with (, ω) is defined by using Lagrangian Floer theory in such generality, see Akaho-Joyce (2010) and Fukaya-Oh-Ohta-Ono (2009). The morphism of an unobstructed immersed Weinstein category (from (₁, ω₁) to (₂, ω₂)) is, by definition, a pair of an immersed Lagrangian submanifold of the direct product and its bounding cochain (in the sense of Akaho-Joyce (2010) and Fukaya-Oh-Ohta-Ono (2009)). Such a morphism transforms an (immersed) Lagrangian submanifold of (₁, ω₁) to one of (₂, ω₂). The key new result proved in this paper shows that this geometric transformation preserves the unobstructedness of the Lagrangian Floer theory. Thus, this paper generalizes earlier results by Wehrheim-Woodward and Mau-Wehrheim-Woodward so that it works in complete generality in the compact case. The main idea of the proofs is based on Lekili-Lipyanskiy's Y diagram and a lemma from homological algebra, together with systematic use of the Yoneda functor. In other words, the proofs are based on a different idea from those that are studied by Bottmann, Mau, Wehrheim, and Woodward, where strip shrinking and figure 8 bubble play the central role.
|
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 1815-0659 |