Partitioning of Volatile Halocarbons between Surrogates for Atmospheric Solid Aerosols and Gas Phase as Examined by TPD MS and Inverse Gas Chromatography

The desorption non-isothermal kinetics of preliminary adsorbed Cl, Br, and I-containing volatile halocarbons from the surface of surrogates for atmospheric solid aerosols (fumed silica and alumina, silica gel and H-mordenite) was studied by TPD MS. The TPD spectra demonstrate high heterogeneity of t...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Хімія, фізика та технологія поверхні
Datum:2010
Hauptverfasser: Bogillo, V.I., Bazylevska, M.S., Mischanchuk, B.G., Pokrovskiy, V.A.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:Englisch
Veröffentlicht: Інститут хімії поверхні ім. О.О. Чуйка НАН України 2010
Online Zugang:https://nasplib.isofts.kiev.ua/handle/123456789/29023
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Назва журналу:Digital Library of Periodicals of National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine
Zitieren:Partitioning of Volatile Halocarbons between Surrogates for Atmospheric Solid Aerosols and Gas Phase as Examined by TPD MS and Inverse Gas Chromatography / V.I. Bogillo, M.S. Bazylevska, B.G. Mischanchuk, V.A. Pokrovskiy // Хімія, фізика та технологія поверхні. — 2010. — Т. 1, № 4. — С. 401-414. — Бібліогр.: 38 назв. — англ.

Institution

Digital Library of Periodicals of National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine
_version_ 1860230197748432896
author Bogillo, V.I.
Bazylevska, M.S.
Mischanchuk, B.G.
Pokrovskiy, V.A.
author_facet Bogillo, V.I.
Bazylevska, M.S.
Mischanchuk, B.G.
Pokrovskiy, V.A.
citation_txt Partitioning of Volatile Halocarbons between Surrogates for Atmospheric Solid Aerosols and Gas Phase as Examined by TPD MS and Inverse Gas Chromatography / V.I. Bogillo, M.S. Bazylevska, B.G. Mischanchuk, V.A. Pokrovskiy // Хімія, фізика та технологія поверхні. — 2010. — Т. 1, № 4. — С. 401-414. — Бібліогр.: 38 назв. — англ.
collection DSpace DC
container_title Хімія, фізика та технологія поверхні
description The desorption non-isothermal kinetics of preliminary adsorbed Cl, Br, and I-containing volatile halocarbons from the surface of surrogates for atmospheric solid aerosols (fumed silica and alumina, silica gel and H-mordenite) was studied by TPD MS. The TPD spectra demonstrate high heterogeneity of the surface studied. The average desorption activation energies and half-widths of the halocarbons desorption energy rectangular distribution were calculated. The relationships between the average desorption activation energies and molecular descriptors for the halocarbons were derived for the solids. The partitioning of the halocarbons and additional volatile organics between surrogates for mineral and carbonaceous atmospheric aerosols (silica gel, Carbopack S, Carbosil) was examined by using the inverse gas chromatography method. These data indicate to the energetic heterogeneity of the solid surfaces. The average adsorption energies and variances of the adsorption energy rectangular distribution were calculated and connected with molecular descriptors of the volatiles. A relationship is observed between average desorption activation energies of halocarbons on the silica gel surface from TPD MS data and average adsorption energies in these systems determined using inverse gas chromatography method at finite concentrations. Кінетика неізотермичної десорбції попередньо адсорбованих Cl, Br і I-вмістних галогенвуглеводнів (ГВ) з поверхні сурогатів атмосферних твердих аерозолів (пірогенні кремнезем і оксид алюмінію, силікагель і Н-морденіт) вивчена методом температурно-програмованої десорбційної мас-спектрометрії (ТПД МС). ТПД спектри демонструють високу неоднорідність вивчених поверхонь. Розраховані середні величини енергії активації десорбції та півширини прямокутних розподілів енергій десорбції ГВ. Отримані співвідношення між середніми енергіями активації десорбції ГВ і їх молекулярними дескрипторами для всіх вивчених твердих тіл. Розподіл ГВ і додаткових летких органічних сполук між сурогатами мінеральних і вуглецьвмісних атмосферних аерозолів (сілікагель, Карбопак і Карбосіл) досліджено методом оберненої газової хроматографії (ОГХ). Дані ОГХ вказують на енергетичну неоднорідність поверхні цих твердих тіл. Розраховані середні величини енергії адсорбції ГВ і дисперсії прямокутного розподілу поверхонь по енергіям адсорбції та знайдені зв’язки між цими величинами та молекулярними дескрипторами цих летких сполук. Встановлено співвідношення між середніми енергіями активації десорбції ГВ з силікагелю з даних ТПД МС і середніми енергіями адсорбції в цих системах, визначеними з даних ОГХ при скінченних концентраціях. Кинетика неизотермической десорбции предварительно адсорбированных Cl, Br и I-содержащих галогенуглеводородов (ГУ) с поверхности суррогатов атмосферных твердых аэрозолей (пирогенные кремнезем и окись алюминия, силикагель и Н-морденит) изучена методом температурно-программированной десорбционной масс-спектрометрии (ТПД МС). ТПД спектры демонстрируют высокую неоднородность изученных поверхностей. Рассчитаны средние значения энергии активации десорбции и полуширины прямоугольных распределений энергий десорбции ГУ. Получены соотношения между средними величинами энергии активации десорбции ГУ и их молекулярными дескрипторами для всех изученных твердых тел. Распределение ГУ и добавочных летучих органических соединений между суррогатами минеральных и углеродсодержащих атмосферных аэрозолей (силикагель, Карбопак и Карбосил) исследовано методом обращенной газовой хроматографии (ОГХ). Данные ОГХ указывают на энергетическую неоднородность поверхности этих твердых тел. Рассчитаны средние энергиии адсорбции ГУ и дисперсии прямоугольного распределения поверхностей по энергиям адсорбции и найдены связи между этими величинами и молекулярными дескрипторами летучих соединений. Установлено соотношение между средними энергиями активации десорбции ГУ с силикагеля из данных ТПД МС и средними энергиями адсорбции в этих системах, определенными из данных ОГХ при конечных концентрациях.
first_indexed 2025-12-07T18:21:13Z
format Article
fulltext Хімія, фізика та технологія поверхні. 2010. Т. 1. № 4. С. 401–414 _____________________________________________________________________________________________ * Corresponding author vbog@carrier.kiev.ua ХФТП 2010. Т. 1. № 4 401 UDC 544.723.3:543.51+543.544:543.27:544.772 PARTITIONING OF VOLATILE HALOCARBONS BETWEEN SURROGATES FOR ATMOSPHERIC SOLID AEROSOLS AND GAS PHASE AS EXAMINED BY TPD MS AND INVERSE GAS CHROMATOGRAPHY V.I. Bogillo1*, M.S. Bazylevska1, B.G. Mischanchuk2, V.A. Pokrovskiy2 1Department of Antarctic Geology and Geoecology Institute of Geological Sciences of National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine 55B Oles' Gonchar Street, Kyiv 01054, Ukraine 2Chuiko Institute of Surface Chemistry of National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine 17 General Naumov Street, Kyiv 03164, Ukraine The desorption non-isothermal kinetics of preliminary adsorbed Cl, Br, and I-containing volatile halo- carbons from the surface of surrogates for atmospheric solid aerosols (fumed silica and alumina, silica gel and H-mordenite) was studied by TPD MS. The TPD spectra demonstrate high heterogeneity of the surface studied. The average desorption activation energies and half-widths of the halocarbons desorption energy rectangular distribution were calculated. The relationships between the average desorption activation ener- gies and molecular descriptors for the halocarbons were derived for the solids. The partitioning of the halo- carbons and additional volatile organics between surrogates for mineral and carbonaceous atmospheric aerosols (silica gel, Carbopack S, Carbosil) was examined by using the inverse gas chromatography method. These data indicate to the energetic heterogeneity of the solid surfaces. The average adsorption en- ergies and variances of the adsorption energy rectangular distribution were calculated and connected with molecular descriptors of the volatiles. A relationship is observed between average desorption activation en- ergies of halocarbons on the silica gel surface from TPD MS data and average adsorption energies in these systems determined using inverse gas chromatography method at finite concentrations. INTRODUCTION The volatile F, Cl, Br and I-containing halo- carbons (HCs) used as solvents and refrigerants are important priority toxic pollutants because exposure to the dangerous HCs can be injurious to human health and ecosystems [1]. Many of these compounds are toxic and exhibit mutagenic and/or carcinogenic properties. Major potential health effects of HCs exposure include acute and chronic respiratory effects, neurological toxicity, lung cancer, and eye and throat irritation. The HCs participate in much heterogeneous industrial and natural processes. So, heterogene- ous reactions of the HCs on the surface of strato- spheric cryoaerosols are responsible for the de- velopment of the Antarctic ozone hole [2]. Re- lease of chlorine during the HCs reactions with constituents of rocket exhaust formed by solid rocket motors (α- and γ-Al2O3) may provide an additional source of active chlorine that may cata- lytically destroy the stratospheric ozone [3]. Assessment of the importance of heterogene- ous chemical reactions of HCs taking place on the surface of particulates present in the troposphere is an area of ongoing studies [4]. Heterogeneous transformations of HCs may decrease tropospheric oxidation potential which has been previously es- timated from consideration of only gas-phase re- actions of HCs with OH, NO3 radicals and ozone [5, 6]. In case of such Langmuir-Hinshelwood heterogeneous reactions, the reaction coefficient depends on the adsorption energy of the HCs [7]. Potential of soils, sediments, ocean, snow and vegetation as sources and sinks for HCs has widely been discussed [8–11]. The volatile spe- cies can be transported over long distances from emission sources and be distributed between air and these environmental compartments. Adsorp- tion of the HCs on these surfaces is a first stage of their removal from atmosphere and it determines the effectiveness of subsequent transformations such as photochemical, chemical and microbial oxidation, etc. Knowledge of HCs adsorption V.I. Bogillo, M.S. Bazylevska, B.G. Mischanchuk, V.A. Pokrovskiy _____________________________________________________________________________________________ 402 ХФТП 2010. Т. 1. № 4 characteristics from gas phase to such interfaces as water, snow, plants, rocks, soils, and sedi- ments, organic, carbonaceous and mineral aero- sols is important for assessing the partitioning and transport of the organics in our environment. The air/interface partition coefficients are involved as input parameters in current stationary and dy- namic models of atmospheric and environmental chemistry [12]. However, these data for most at- mospherically abundant HCs on various envi- ronmental interfaces are unknown. Adsorption process is perhaps the most com- mon method for the capture and recovery of HCs vapors, such as cleaning solvent vapors, from gas stream [13]. Most adsorbents play a role of catalyst in heterogeneous transformations of HCs or cata- lyst supports [14, 15]. Adsorption data for HCs are essential in choice and development of appropriate and selective adsorbents, solid sensors and in com- prehension and the modeling of reaction kinetics on solid catalysts. In all cases, a priori prediction of the adsorption characteristics would be very useful in order to reduce the experimental efforts. Inverse gas chromatography (IGC) [16] and thermal programmed desorption mass spectrome- try (TPD MS) [17] would be appropriate methods for quantitative study of the HCs partitioning be- tween gas phase and the solid surfaces. In the pre- sent work, we experimentally studied the partition- ing of some Cl-, Br-, and I-containing volatile HCs between surrogates of mineral and carbonaceous aerosols and gas phase by using these methods. EXPERIMENTAL Materials. Following HPLC grade HCs (Merck, Germany) were used in the IGC and TPD MS study: dichloromethane (CH2Cl2), chloroform (CHCl3), carbon tetrachloride (CCl4), 1,2-dichloroethane (C2H4Cl2), trichloroethylene (C2HCl3), dibromomethane (CH2Br2), bromoform (CHBr3), 1,2-dibromoethane (C2H4Br2), 1-bromobutane (C4H9Br), and methyl iodide (CH3I). These HCs are emitted from industrial and natural sources [1]. Most of them are present in the troposphere in appreciable concentrations and, therefore, they affect the atmospheric level of HOx (HO, HO2) radicals and ozone. Furthermore, fol- lowing volatile "test" compounds (Merck, Ger- many) possessing different electronic polarizability and acid-base characteristics of the molecules were used in the IGC study: n-pentane, n-hexane, n-hep- tane, benzene, carbon disulfide, acetonitrile, nitro- methane, nitroethane, methanol, ethanol, acetone, diethyl ether, tetrahydrofurane, and 1,4-dioxane. The parameters of the Antoine equation and the liquid densities at the standard temperature (293 K) required to calculate their adsorption iso- therms from IGC data are taken from [18]. Since the main component of terrigenous aero- sols in the troposphere is silica [19] the silica gel S60 (Fluka, Switzerland) with BET specific ad- sorption surface area of SA = 336 m2/g (as deter- mined from low-temperature nitrogen adsorption measurements (77 K) by using an ASAP 2010 volumetric adsorption apparatus from Micromerit- ics (Norcross, GA)) and fumed silica Aerosil 300 (Chlorovinyl Co, Kalush, Ukraine) with SA = 267 m2/g are chosen as this component. Se- cond main component of the mineral aerosols is alumina [19] and the fumed alumina (Chlorovinyl Co, Kalush, Ukraine) with SA = 159 m2/g was used in the TPD MS study. Zeolites are widely used as catalysts for dehalogenation processes of the HCs [15] and similar reactions are possible in the tropo- spheric conditions on the surface of mineral aero- sols containing these minerals. A sample of com- mercial hydrogen mordenite (H-mordenite from Norton Co., USA) with SA = 380 m2/g and with Si/Al = 10.7 was used in the TPD MS study. Carbonaceous aerosols were imitated by graphitized carbon black (Carbopack C; Supelco, Bellefonte, PA, USA) with SA = 10 m2/g and the silica gel modified by low-temperature carboniza- tion of acetylacetone (Carbosil with 35 wt% car- bon) with SA = 100 m2/g [20]. The latter was cho- sen because the burning of solid fuels yields large amount of silica [19]. TPD-MS procedure. TPD MS technique has been developed, aimed at studies of adsorption- desorption kinetics and chemical transformations of HCs on the environmental surfaces starting from very low temperature (100 K). The equip- ment set included monopole mass analyzer MX- 7304A (Ukraine, Sumy), liquid nitrogen free vac- uum system and pump NMD 0.16–1, precise thermal regulator with heating element RIF-101, quarts-molybdenum tube for samples and IBM computer-guided system of registration and moni- toring. Equipment parameters obtained in our test experiments are: mass range is 1–400 Dalton, resolving power is 10% intensity of 1/M, sensitiv- ity is 10-8 g; the heating rate ranges from 0.05 to 30 K/min and average experiment duration is 1 hour. The adsorption capacity of the dispersed Partitioning of Volatile Halocarbons between Surrogates for Atmospheric Solid Aerosols and Gas Phase _____________________________________________________________________________________________ ХФТП 2010. Т. 1. № 4 403 solids has been provided desorption of about 10-3 times the weight of sample. The result is a gain in sensitivity of about 105 in comparison with bulk samples. All the experimental scheme of TPD of ultra-fine samples became similar to thermal analysis experiment with mass spectrometric de- tection of volatile products. The dispersed samples of the solids each of about 0.1–1 mg weight are placed into a quartz- molybdenum tube and evacuated at 10-1 Pa and then attached to the inlet system of the mass spec- trometer. The reactor-to-mass spectrometer inter- face included a high-vacuum valve with an orifice of diameter 5 mm and the inlet tube of 20 cm length which was kept at 150°C. The reaction space is open in the ion-source direction and at the heating rate used (about 0.1 K s-1) the observed intensity of the ion current is expected to be pro- portional to the desorption rate so that diffusion retardation may be neglected. We assumed quasi- stationary conditions when the shape and position of desorption peaks did not depend on the tempera- ture of the spectrometer interface, the sample dis- persity and/or its size. The TPD data were not con- sidered further if these conditions were not fulfilled. In the typical TPD MS experiment the solid sample was preliminarily pressed at 3·103 Pa. This procedure, as it has been shown previously, does not change specific surface area of the fumed ma- terials. Preliminary vacuum treatment of the sam- ples was provided at the temperature 970 K during 2 hours. Sample pellet of size 2×2×1 mm has been introduced into quartz-molybdenum tube and evacuated at 7.5·10-7 Pa for half of an hour. After cooling the sample down to room temperature the material has been exposed to a HC vapor in amount of inner volume of quartz-molybdenum tube i.e. about 10 cm3. Then the sample was cooled down to the temperature of liquid nitrogen. Cool- ing lasted approximately 10 minutes. When the stationary temperature of the sample has been achieved, the high-vacuum pumping started and after five-minutes of pumping the cyclic record of mass spectra was switched on. The temperature has been recorded for each cycle and, correspond- ingly, to each mass spectrum. At the first stage of record the typical mass spectrum of a HC was ob- served, further all a HC was pumped away and only chemical background was observed in the mass spectrum. For example, characteristic tem- perature of 1,2-dichloroethane disappearance from the Aerosil 300 surface was 246°K. IGC procedure. The inverse chromatographic measurements were carried out with gas chro- matograph "LKhM 80" (Russia). Thermal con- ductivity detector was used in the study. The ana- log output from the detector was digitalized and recorded on an IBM PC computer controlled by original software (Turbo Pascal) to determine the coordinates of chromatographic peak from those measurements. Helium was used as the carrier gas. Air, as a non-interacting marker, was em- ployed to measure the dead volume of the chro- matographic column. Injection of the volatile compounds was repeated at least three times. Flow rate was measured at the end of the column with a bubble flow meter and its value was main- tained in the range 30–40 cm3/min. Pressures measured at the inlet and outlet of the column (scaling factor was 0.15 Pa) were applied to cal- culate the net retention volume. The molecular probes were injected manually with Hamilton glass micro syringes (Hamilton micro liter 700 and 7000 series syringe). The volume of injected liquid probes varied from 0.1 to 5 µl. Short stainless columns (400 mm long and 3 mm I.D.) were filled by the examined solids. The columns were preliminary conditioned under he- lium at 470 K for 12 h before their use to remove the physically adsorbed water and other volatile traces from the solid surface. Adsorption measure- ments were carried out over a temperature range of from 353 to 453 K (at the isothermal conditions, scaling factor was 0.2 K) at 10 K interval. The tem- peratures of the detector and injector were 473 K. Calculation of primary IGC data. The specific adsorption retention volume, VS o (in cm3/m2) for the examined molecular probes was calculated as 0 0 3 2 0 0 2 1 1 2 315,273 )( P PP P P P P TwS F ttV OH o i i rA X o g − × −      −      ×××−= (1) where tX and t0 are the retention times of the mo- lecular probe and of the non-interacting marker (air) at column temperature T (in K), F is the flow rate of the carrier gas through column measured on the output at room temperature Tr, w is the weight of a solid in the column, PH2O is the satu- rated water vapor pressure at the Tr, Pi and PO are the pressures of the carrier gas measured at the inlet and outlet of the column. The "multiple injection" and "one-peak" methods are commonly applied to the analysis of V.I. Bogillo, M.S. Bazylevska, B.G. Mischanchuk, V.A. Pokrovskiy _____________________________________________________________________________________________ 404 ХФТП 2010. Т. 1. № 4 the chromatographic peak dependence on the known amount of the liquid probe injected into the chromatographic column, and for the subse- quent determination of the adsorption isotherm on the surface of chromatographic support [21]. In both methods a given amount of probe injected quickly, inducing a peak. Adsorption or desorp- tion may be followed by a mathematical examina- tion of the front and tail of the recorded peak. The first method analyses the dependence of specific adsorption retention volume on the probe amount, whereas second approach deals with co-ordinates of the chromatographic peak at moderate or large amount of the probe. The calculation of the vapor pressure for the molecular probes, Pcorr and the surface solid coverage, acorr for the adsorption isotherms using "one-peak" method with correction for multilayer adsorption [22] was carried out from the data for the peak’ profile (400–2000 points) as follows i corrpeak p h FSMW TvR P ×         ×× ××× = ρ , (2) )(adsi Apeak p S wSSMW v a ×         ××× × = ρ , (3) 1 11 2 3 3 2 2 −      −      ×       −×× = o i o i k o OH corr P P P P T P P TF F , (4) S corr PP P P /1− = , (5) S corr PP a a /1− = (6) where R is the universal gas constant, vp is the vol- ume of the liquid probe injected, ρ is the liquid den- sity at Tk, MW is the molecular weight, Speak is the total area of the chromatographic peak calculated by its numerical integration, Fcorr is the flow rate cor- rected by compressibility of the carrier gas in the column and change of surface tension for water in the bubble flow meter with the Tr value, hi is the height for the point i localized on the descending side of the peak’ tail, Si(ads) is the product of the dis- tance on the chromatogram from the retention time of non-interacting marker to the retention time for point i on the height of the point, hi, PS is the satu- rated vapor pressure for the liquid probe at T. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION TPD MS measurements and calculation of de- sorption activation parameters. The desorption of the HCs preliminary adsorbed on the surrogates for mineral atmospheric particulates was studied by TPD MS method from liquid nitrogen up to room temperature. In all cases, observed mass spectra included reliably identified lines of HCs as a main component. The shape and temperature interval of evolution of molecular ion varied depending on the nature of the surrogate and adsorbed HCs. All mass spectra included also line of water of medium inten- sity, starting its evolution from the sample at the temperature of about 150 K for all samples. Fig. 1 presents desorption peaks for the HCs from the silica gel surface. It is obvious that the shape of the peaks, their width and temperature maximum depend on the HCs structure. 120 160 200 240 0 40 80 120 CH 3 I n-C 4 H 9 Br C 2 HCl 3 1,2-C 2 H 4 Cl 2 CHCl 3 CH 2 Cl 2 CCl 4 I, a rb . u ni ts T, K Fig. 1. TPD spectra of Cl, Br and I-containing volatile halocarbons preliminary adsorbed on the silica gel (Si60) surface. The heating rate was 0.1 K/s For the interpretation of temperature depend- encies of mass spectra we assume that the desorp- tion equation may be expressed as a first-order process from homogeneous solid surface Θ−=Θ Dkdtd / (7) where Θ is the surface coverage and the desorp- tion rate coefficient, kD is )/exp( RTEAk DDD −= (8) where ED is the desorption activation energy and AD is the pre-exponential factor. Both Eqs. (7) and (8) constitute the Polanyi- Wigner equation: )/exp(/ RTEAdtd DD −−=Θ . At the initial condition Θ t = =0 1 we have the following solution of equation (7) )](exp[)( tt Φ−=Θ , (9) ∫=Φ t D dtkt 0 )( . (10) Partitioning of Volatile Halocarbons between Surrogates for Atmospheric Solid Aerosols and Gas Phase _____________________________________________________________________________________________ ХФТП 2010. Т. 1. № 4 405 According to Eq. (9) desorption rate which is proportional to ion current may be obtained in the following form )](exp[/)( tkdttd D Φ−−=Θ . (11) The key equation (10) may be expressed in an approximate analytical form for a slow heating rate ( β ≤ 0.1 K/s) and high values of the pre- exponential factor (AD > 109 s-1) assuming a linear heating rate, T = T0 + β t and expanding the tem- perature dependence near the peak’ maximum Tmax )exp()( 2 max RT E A E RT t D D D −=Φ β (12) which, in most cases, is valid within experimental accuracy. The condition of the maximum value of d dtΘ / (or ion current I t( ) ) is Φ( )t = 1 . The behavior of I T( ) near the peak maxi- mum may be used for calculating the parameters of non-isothermal kinetics. The behavior of the experimentally observed ion intensity I T( ) in the neighborhood of Tmax may be written as 2 1/)( 2 max TI ITI ∆′′−= (13) where maxTTT −=∆ and ′′I is the value of the sec- ond derivative at the peak maximum of experi- mental curve I = f(T). Expanding, on the other hand, the expressions for ion current taking into account Eq. (12) and the condition Φ( )t = 1 in the neighborhood of Tmax and comparing with the chosen experimental val- ues TTT −=∆ max and corresponding III −=∆ max one can easily obtain approximate formulas for the calculation of the desorption ac- tivation parameters 3 max 1027.8 −= DD TE σ [kJ/mol] (14a) and )exp( max DDD T A σσβ= [s-1], (14b) max max2 I I T T D ∆ ∆ =σ . (14c) The determination of ∆T value and the cor- responding max/ II∆ from an experimental curve depends upon two opposing factors. max/TT∆ should be chosen as small as possible to preserve the validity of approximation made to derive equation (12); II /∆ , on the contrary, should be chosen as large as possible to decrease the error of graphical measurement of ∆I . A typical com- promise is the value ∆I/I of about 0.1–0.3; the corresponding value of ∆T is found from the experimental peak I = f(T). The values ∆I and ∆T should be derived from the low-temperature side of desorption peak. The existence of differ- ent adsorption sites on a solid surface being the most common source of the more or less overlap- ping peaks on the experimental TPD spectra. In case of first-order desorption from energetically heterogeneous surface it is necessary to introduce a normalized distribution function for surface sites over ED values: )( DEρ . Then the total de- sorption rate dΘ/dt (and the total ion current, I) should be calculated as an integral ∫ ∞Θ 0 )( )( DD dEE dt td dt d ρθ (15) where dθ(t)/dt is the local desorption rate from the surface sites with desorption activation energy ED at point t. Unfortunately, very little information is available concerning ρ(ED) function in most cases of adsorption of organic molecules on the solid surfaces. In what follows condition Φ( )t = 1 is applied to the simplest distribution function ρ(ED). Let function ρ(ED) be a rectangle in the interval ED(min), ED(max) of magnitude 1 (min)(max) )( −− DD EE . In this case ∫− =Θ (max) min) )(1 (min)(max) D D E E D D DD dE dt Ed EEdt d θ . (16) Neglecting the weak pre-exponential dependen- cies upon T and ED, and substituting ED and T by average values Tmax and 2/)( (min)(max) DD EE + , the following approximate expression may be obtained for this model [ ]),(),( )( )( (min)(max) (min)(max)max (max)(min) tEtE EET EE dt d DD DD DD Θ−Θ× × − + =Θ β . (17) V.I. Bogillo, M.S. Bazylevska, B.G. Mischanchuk, V.A. Pokrovskiy _____________________________________________________________________________________________ 406 ХФТП 2010. Т. 1. № 4 Table 1. Average desorption activation energies (ED(av)) and half-widths (∆D/2) of the rectangular halocarbons de- sorption activation energy distributions of surfaces for surrogates of mineral aerosols from TPD MS data and evaporation enthalpies for the halocarbons, ∆Hvap from [18] Halocarbon A-300 Silica gel Al2O3 H-mordenite ED(av) ∆D/2 ED(av) ∆D/2 ED(av) ∆D/2 ED(av) ∆D/2 ∆Hvap kJ/mol CH2Cl2 50 20 70 10 64 10 67 17 28.0 CHCl3 53 15 75 10 60 20 70 8 29.7 CCl4 60 20 65 25 59 11 71 11 30.0 1,2C2H4Cl2 54 20 70 10 67 15 75 15 32.0 C2HCl3 51 15 60 20 55 17 69 9 31.4 n-C4H9Br 55 13 75 15 73 17 78 16 33.0 CH3I 42 12 60 10 27.2 Substitution of equations (9) and (12) in (17) gives the analytical dependence of the ion current upon the variables and parameters of the model ]exp [exp )( )( (min) (max) (min) 2 max (max) 2 max (min)(max)max (max)(min)         −− −         −× × − + =Θ − − RT E D D RT E D D DD DD D D eA E RT eA E RT EET EE dt d β β β . (18) The observed great width of the desorption peaks (Fig. 1) points to the large energetic surface heterogeneity of the solids studied. The Eq. (11) is not reconcilable with experimental TPD spectra for all systems examined. Then the average desorption activation energies and half-widths of the rectan- gular desorption activation energy distributions were calculated assuming minimal pre-exponential desorption factor AD = 1.0·1013 s-1 [23] with use of Eq. (18). These data are presented in Table 1. From the Table we notice that both the average desorption activation energy and width of the dis- tribution depend on the halocarbon structure and the solid surface. Maximum ED(av) values are ob- tained for H-mordenite and the minimum ones are characteristic of the Aerosil-300 surface. One would expect the proximity of a ED(min) value for the physical desorption of preliminary adsorbed volatile compounds to the evaporation enthalpy of the compounds, ∆Hvap. However, as it is evident from the Table, the difference between a quantity ED(av)–∆D/2 and ∆Hvap varies from 2 to 30 kJ/mol. One of reason for this difference may be choice of very large pre-exponential factor AD for the evaporation process. Formerly we exam- ined the non-isothermal desorption of water from silica surfaces by TPD MS and DTG methods [24] and for n-butanol desorption from silica gel sur- face by Q-TG and Q-DTG methods under quasi- equilibrium conditions [25]. The most calculations of AD from the TPD spectra of water physically adsorbed on silica by using the most popular Po- lanyi-Wigner, Kissinger and Freeman methods [26] give lower desorption pre-exponential factors, ranging from 0.8 to 3.6·105 s-1, than the vibrational frequency, 1013 s-1 [24]. The dramatic decrease of AD was explained by limitations of the methods for independent evolution of AD in the desorption kinet- ics from the heterogeneous solid surface [25]. An equation for estimation of the minimal AD value in the TPD and Q-DTG studies of physically adsorbed liquids was proposed in [25]               −      ∆ + ∆ = β b b vap b vap D T RT H RT H A lnlnexp(min) (19) where Tb is the boiling temperature of the liquid at standard temperature, in K. The calculation of the AD values for HCs from Table 1 by Eq. (19) gives AD varied from 90 s-1 (CCl4) to 161 s-1 (n-C4H9Br). Because the ap- proximate Redhead first-order desorption kinetic equation [25] predicts that difference between two desorption activation energies ED(1) and ED(2) is ( ))2()1(max)2()1( lnln DDDD AARTEE −=− , (20) the decrease in AD value from 1013 s-1 to 102 s-1 leads to the difference of ∆ED up to 30 kJ/mol at Tmax ∼ 150 K. Then the ED(av) values from Table 1 would be shifted of about 30 kJ/mol in the low energy direction at AD ∼ 102 s-1. Partitioning of Volatile Halocarbons between Surrogates for Atmospheric Solid Aerosols and Gas Phase _____________________________________________________________________________________________ ХФТП 2010. Т. 1. № 4 407 Almost all theoretical studies of TPD have been based on the absolute rate theory (ART) [27]. The inapplicability of the classical Polanyi-Wigner equation to describe the thermodesorption kinetics from real solid surfaces was known long ago. Various generalizations of the ART expressions, toward taking into account interactions between adsorbed molecules, energetic surface heterogene- ity, existence of "precursor states" and other were proposed [27]. For example, Nagai showed [27] that the ART approach underestimates the role of entropy changes as an important factor affecting the kinetics of adsorption/desorption processes. The pre-exponential term for desorption rate in- cludes product of molecular partition function of the adsorbed molecules, q0 s and a constant charac- teristic for an adsorption system, ξ and they were treated as the best fit parameters in the Nagai the- ory whereas this term in the Kreuzer-Payne theory is: sg sD qqhmkTkTSA 000 /)/2( πα= where S0 is a "sticking coefficient" on a "empty" surface, αs is the "condensation" coefficient, q0 g is the partition function of gas molecules related to the internal degrees of freedom. Also, the pre-exponential fac- tor )/exp()/( 00 kTqKK ss gsD µ−= , where Kgs is a con- stant related to the exchange rate between gas phase and the solid surface once an isolated system has reached equilibrium, µ0 s is the standard chemi- cal potential of the adsorbed molecules, was pro- posed for the thermodesorption kinetics by using the Statistical Rate Theory of Interfacial Transport (SRTIT) [27]. The most parameters in above ex- pressions are unknown or make sense as purely empiric. Then the AD values are not limited by T/2πh ∼ 1013 s-1 as their downward boundary. We attempt to describe the effect of HCs structure on the ED(av) values from Table 1 by us- ing the quantitative "structure-activity" relation- ship (QSAR) similarly proposed in [28] 423221)( aaaaE HH eavD +Σ×+Σ×+×= αβα (21) where αe is the molecular deformation polariza- bility of a HC, Σα2 H and Σβ2 H are its acidity and basicity for the H-bond formation in the Abraham scale and coefficients a1, a2 and a3 characterize average ability of surface solid sites to dispersive interaction, and the interaction with acid and base adsorbed molecules at H-bond formation while a4 is a constant for given solid surface. The αe, Σα2 H and Σβ2 H values for the HCs were taken from [29, 30]. The calculated coefficients are presented in Table 2. Table 2. Coefficients of Eq. (21) for thermodesorption of halocarbons from the surface of surrogates for atmospheric mineral aerosols Coefficient A-300 Silica gel Al2O3 H-mordenite a1, kJ/(mol A3) 1.5±1.1 1.7±1.4 0.9±0.8 a2, kJ/mol 54±42 113±43 51±25 a3, kJ/mol – 86±58 – – a4, kJ/mol 41±13 45±16 60±15 61±9 R 0.756 0.668 0.897 0.916 As is evident from Table, the Eq. (21) ade- quately describes the desorption kinetics of HCs from the solids examined. The best result is ob- tained for H-mordenite whereas worst result is observed for silica gel (the lowest correlation co- efficient R). High a1 and a2 coefficients denote the contributions of polarizability of surface sites and their acidity to desorption activation energy of HCs. As to H-mordenite, the terminal silanols (Si–OH), extra-framework AlOH groups and framework bridged Si–OH–Al species are its main Bronsted surface sites and their acidity in H-bond formation decreases as: SiOH > AlOH > Si–OH–Al [31]. This leads to the surface hetero- geneity and to the high a2 coefficient for the solid. IGC measurements and calculation of the ad- sorption equilibrium parameters. The inverse chromatographic measurements were performed for 23 volatile organic compounds including 9 HCs on the surface of silica gel, Carbopack S and Carbosil. For all systems examined, we observed an appre- ciable dependence of the retention time on the probe amount. One example is displayed in Fig. 2. That the shapes of the tails of the peaks coincide for vari- ous amounts of the probe suggest that the observed asymmetry of the peaks has an equilibrium nature associated with nonlinearity of the adsorption iso- therm rather than the diffusion kinetic one. In all cases, adsorption isotherms calculated from the IGC data at various temperatures are concave with respect to the surface coverage axis (Fig. 3); i. e., they do not obey the Henry ad- sorption isotherm equation even at low cover- age (below 10% of a monolayer). Although the Langmuir adsorption isotherm equation is more suitable to describe the isotherms in this coverage range, all the systems, except for n-alkanes/Carbopack exhibit significant devia- tions from the Langmuir equation. V.I. Bogillo, M.S. Bazylevska, B.G. Mischanchuk, V.A. Pokrovskiy _____________________________________________________________________________________________ 408 ХФТП 2010. Т. 1. № 4 0 100 200 300 400 500 0 5 10 15 20 0.2 µµµµl 0.5 µµµµl 1.0 µµµµl 2.0 µµµµl D et ec to r R es po ns e t x , s Fig. 2. Dependence of retention time and peak profile for CH2Br2/Carbosil system at 413 K on the amount of the liquid probe 0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 0.0 1.0x10-4 2.0x10-4 3.0x10-4 433 K423 K413 K a corr , µµµµmole/m2 Y A xi s T itl e P corr , Pa Fig. 3. Adsorption isotherms at different temperatures for CH2Br2 on the Carbosil surface calculated from IGC data by using the "one peak" method 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 30 35 40 45 50 Q A(iso) , kJ mole-1 a corr , µµµµmole m-2 Fig. 4. Dependence of isosteric adsorption heat for CH3I/Carbosil on the solid surface coverage That the solid surfaces are heterogeneous is confirmed by the exponential fall of calculated isosteric adsorption heats as the surface coverage raises (Fig. 4). Therefore, the partitioning of the volatile organic compounds including HCs be- tween the gas phase and the surface of the surro- gates for solid atmospheric aerosols should be de- scribed with regard to the energetic heterogeneity of the surface similarly to above TPD MS data. The common integral equation for the adsorp- tion equilibrium from gas phase on the heteroge- neous surface is [16] ∫=Θ (max) (min) )(),,(),( A A E E AAA dEEETPTP ρθ (22) where Θ(P,T) = acorr/am is the total relative surface coverage at Pcorr and T, am is the monolayer capac- ity, θ(P,T,EA) is the relative surface coverage of sur- face sites with adsorption energy EA, ρ(EA) is the normalized differential adsorption energy distribu- tion of the total surface, and EA(min) and EA(max) are the lower and upper boundaries of the distribution. To solve Eq. (22), it is necessary to determine function θ(P,T,EA). Let it be described by the Langmuir adsorption isotherm (lateral interaction between adsorbed molecules is ignored)      +       = RT E K P RT E K P ETP A A A exp1 exp ),,( 0 0θ (23) where K0 is the Langmuir constant, which is given by [32] ( )RTHPK vapS /exp0 ∆= . (24) Eq. (22) can be readily solved by the im- proved regularization procedure [33]. Fig. 5a-c show the adsorption energy distributions of 3 halocarbons on the surfaces of Carbopack (a), Silica Gel (b) and Carbosil (c) calculated using this method. As can be seen, the narrowest uni- modal distributions are observed for Carbopack, a solid with an energetically most homogeneous surface. For the Silica gel and Carbosil, several peaks in the distributions are observed. That sev- eral peaks appear is indicative of the existence of several types of adsorption sites with substan- tially different strengths on the solid surface. The position and the shape of the distribution also depend on the halocarbon structure. In passing from CH2Cl2 to 1,2-C2H4Cl2 and to n-C4H9Br, as the polarizability of the molecules increases, the peaks broaden and shift to higher adsorption energies. Partitioning of Volatile Halocarbons between Surrogates for Atmospheric Solid Aerosols and Gas Phase _____________________________________________________________________________________________ ХФТП 2010. Т. 1. № 4 409 2x104 3x104 4x104 5x104 6x104 0.0 1.0x10-4 2.0x10-4 3.0x10-4 n-C 4 H 9 Br 1,2-C 2 H 4 Cl 2 CH 2 Cl 2 ρρρρ(E A ), mole J-1 E A , J mole-1 a 3x104 4x104 5x104 6x104 7x104 0.0 1.0x10-5 2.0x10-5 3.0x10-5 n-C 4 H 9 Br 1,2-C 2 H 4 Cl 2 CH 2 Cl 2 ρρρρ(E A ), mole J-1 E A , J mole-1 b 3x104 4x104 5x104 6x104 7x104 0.0 1.0x10-5 2.0x10-5 3.0x10-5 n-C 4 H 9 Br 1,2-C 2 H 4 Cl 2 CH 2 Cl 2 ρρρρ(E A ), mole J-1 E A , J mole-1 c Fig. 5. Adsorption energy distributions for 3 halo- carbons calculated by using the improved regu- larization procedure from IGC data a –on the Carbopack S surface; b – on the Silica Gel sur- face; c –on the Carbosil surface Although the regularization procedure is effec- tive in identifying the energetic heterogeneity of the solid surfaces, it is unsuitable for quantitative rela- tionship between the molecular descriptors and the adsorption characteristics. Cumulants (semivariants) of the adsorption energy (or free adsorption energy) distributions, rather than the thermodynamic adsorp- tion functions or the logarithms of the partition coef- ficient (which are used in the Henri law region), play the role of functions in the QSARs [34]. It is conven- ient to use in the QSARs the distribution functions that provide an analytical solution to Eq. (22). The simplest distribution that makes it possible to obtain an analytical solution is rectangular distribution      >< ≤≤ − = (max)(min) (max)(min) (min)(max) ;,0 /(1 )( AAAA AAA AA A EEEE EEE EE Eρ (25) Using Eqs. (23) and (25), we obtain the solu- tion to Eq. (22) ( ) ( )      −+ −+ × × − = 0(min)Acorr 0(max)Acorr (min)A(max)A m corr KlnRT/EexpP1 KlnRT/EexpP1 ln EE RTa a . (26) The first- and second-order cumulants of the distri- bution (the average, KI, and the variance, KII) are given by 2/)( (min)(max))( AAavAI EEEK +== , (27) . 4 )EE( )EE(3 EE K 2 (min)A(max)A (min)A(max)A 3 (min)A 3 (max)A2 EaII + − − − − =σ= (28) The calculated KI, and KII for the adsorption sys- tems examined by IGC are presented in Table 3. They are related to molecular descriptors for halocarbons and other volatiles by Eq. (21). The table shows that, in passing from carbon black (which has an energeti- cally nearly homogeneous surface) to Silica Gel and to Carbosil, the variances increase markedly. The results of regression analysis for Eq. (21) are given in Table 4. As can be seen from these data, the mean po- larizability of the solid surface sites increases as Car- bopack>Carbosil>Silica Gel, the mean acidity in the H-bond formation as Silica Gel>Carbosil>Carbopack and the mean basicity in the H-bond formation as Carbosil≈Carbopack>Silica Gel. The last sequence is explained by existence of strong basic sites, such as basal faces of graphite, which can be considered as π- electron condensed systems, ∼C=O and ∼C(O)OH groups. The reason for decay of surface acidity from Silica Gel to Carbosil is the decrease in the hydroxyl groups concentration and their activity after carboni- zation of silica surface. V.I. Bogillo, M.S. Bazylevska, B.G. Mischanchuk, V.A. Pokrovskiy _____________________________________________________________________________________________ 410 ХФТП 2010. Т. 1. № 4 Table 3. Molecular descriptors of volatile organic compounds, their average adsorption energies (EA(av), in kJ mol-1) and the adsorption energy variances (σ2 Ea, in kJ2 mol-2) on the solid surfaces Molecular descriptors Carbopack Carbosil Silica Gel Compound αe,A 3 Σα2 H Σβ2 H EA(av) σ 2 Ea EA(av) σ 2 Ea EA(av) σ 2 Ea CH2Cl2 6.48 0.10 0.05 28.0 104.2 33.0 143.6 28.8 136.8 CHCl3 8.51 0.15 0.02 42.3 0.08 34.1 162.4 28.4 120.6 CCl4 10.48 0 0 41.7 0.03 37.0 150.2 28.7 88.6 1,2-C2H4Cl2 8.0 0.10 0.11 43.1 0.10 37.7 169.1 36.7 63.3 CH2Br2 9.32 0.10 0.10 36.0 1.60 34.0 156.9 29.5 124.2 CHBr3 11.82 0.15 0.09 44.0 0.31 39.3 181.3 30.5 115.2 1,2-C2H4Br2 11.26 0.10 0.17 46.7 0.14 40.9 165.9 33.3 129.2 C4H9Br 13.9 0 0.12 50.7 0.0045 46.0 168.4 35.5 151.8 CH3I 7.97 0 0.13 25.4 104.7 31.9 123.5 25.9 119.6 n-C5H12 9.99 0 0 43.8 0.00008 33.5 127.8 23.4 130.1 n-C6H14 11.76 0 0 48.4 0.00017 38.2 176.5 29.8 65.6 n-C7H16 13.61 0 0 53.3 0.00002 41.3 158.2 32.8 105.1 C6H6 10.33 0 0.14 47.7 13.2 38.0 160.1 35.4 61.2 CH3OH 3.29 0.43 0.47 32.0 103.6 45.6 156.4 41.8 140.2 C2H5OH 5.11 0.37 0.48 37.4 129.8 50.7 170.4 46.7 156.1 (CH3)2C=O 6.40 0.04 0.49 28.4 108.6 38.8 148.7 37.5 136.2 (C2H5)2O 10.2 0 0.45 41.6 8.3 37.4 149.8 33.5 157.4 C4H8O 8.2 0 0.48 31.1 29.5 39.6 165.8 39.8 138.4 C4H8O2 10.0 0 0.64 43.1 0.95 37.2 106.8 44.1 164.2 CH3CN 4.40 0.07 0.33 25.1 107.2 40.2 155.8 34.6 141.9 CH3NO2 7.37 0.06 0.32 26.6 0.00001 37.1 151.8 37.5 67.8 C2H5NO2 9.63 0.02 0.33 33.3 0.00001 41.6 173.6 38.0 121.3 CS2 6.9 0 0.07 37.3 120.3 32.1 141.3 26.9 115.6 Table 4. Coefficients of Eq. 21 for partitioning the volatile organic compounds between gas phase and solid surface Function/ Coefficient Carbopack S Silica Gel Carbosil EA(av) a1, kJ/ (mol A3) 3.1±0.5 0.7±0.3 1.0±0.3 a2, kJ/mol – 25.3±3.6 11.6±3.8 a3, kJ/mol 29.2±10.6 19.4±6.8 30.0±7.0 a4, kJ/mol 9.8±5.4 21.1±3.4 24.4±3.6 R 0.85 0.88 0.77 σ 2 Ea a1, kJ2/(mol2 A6) -15.7±3.5 – 2.8±1.7 a2, kJ2/mol2 – 84.0±33.0 – a3, kJ2/mol2 – – 89.0±37.0 a4, kJ2/mol2 182.0±39.0 84.0±32.0 126.0±19.0 R 0.78 0.55 0.52 The proposed approach makes it possible to establish how the variance of the adsorption en- ergy distribution depends on the molecular de- scriptors. The variance is determined by both the chemical heterogeneity of the surface sites and their topography. As can be seen, the largest con- tribution to the variance for Carbopack comes from the sites polarizability; for Carbosil the con- tribution from basic sites is also important. Acidic sites markedly influence the variance only for Silica Gel, which surface contains various types of silanol groups (single, vicinal and geminal). Relationship between TPD MS and IGC data. As it shown from Fig. 6, a relationship is observed between average desorption activation energies of HCs on the silica gel surface from TPD MS data and average adsorption energies in these systems determined using IGC method at finite concentrations. More low EA(av) values in comparison with ED(av) are explained by more high temperatures in the IGC experiment (from 353 to 453 K) as against the TPD MS experiment Partitioning of Volatile Halocarbons between Surrogates for Atmospheric Solid Aerosols and Gas Phase _____________________________________________________________________________________________ ХФТП 2010. Т. 1. № 4 411 (from 100 to 298 K) and by difference between pre-exponential desorption factor used in the TPD kinetics and average adsorption entropy for the HCs in the IGC study. 60 65 70 75 25 30 35 CH 3 I CCl 4 CH 2 Cl 2 1,2-C 2 H 4 Cl 2 n-C 4 H 9 Br E A (a v) , k J/ m ol e (I G C d at a) E D (av), kJ/mole (TPD MS data) Fig. 6. Relationship between average desorption acti- vation energies (TPD MS data) and average ad- sorption energies (IGC data) for halocarbons on silica gel surface The calculated coefficients a1, a2 and a3 of Eq. (21) from TPD MS and IGC data lie within the same order. Thus, the proposed approach makes it possible to estimate average desorption activation energy and adsorption energy for the HCs on the basis of their molecular descriptors. Compensation effect in the partitioning of HCs on the heterogeneous solid surface. All above calculations of KI and KII values from IGC data were carried out in assumption that K0 con- stant is independent on the surface coverage. In case of dependence of К0 on the Θ(P,T) value, the integral adsorption equation should include in addition to (ρ(EA)) function, the surface distribu- tion on the ln K0 value, ρ(ln K0) also ∫∫ ∆∆ =Θ 0ln, 000 ln)(ln)()ln,,,(),( KE AAA A KddEKEKETPTP ρρθ .(29) Two extreme variants for behavior of the K0 and EA values can be proposed: there are correla- tion between these parameters and its lack. Be- cause )/exp(0 RSK A∆−= where ∆SA is the molar isosteric adsorption entropy, the decrease of mo- lar isosteric adsorption enthalpy may lead to fall of the adsorption entropy. Such relationship be- tween enthalpy and entropy in phase transitions and intermolecular complex formation is well known as "compensation effect" or "isoequilib- rium relationship" [35]. In first time the adsorbing molecules interact with most active sites of the heterogeneous surface at low vapor pressure (high ЕА values). Then the Р value increases and less active sites are filled up. This results in de- crease of -∆SA function and the К0 constant. The "isoequilibrium relationship" between EA and К0 may be written as isoAiso RTEKK /lnln )(00 += (30) where K0(iso) is the К0 value at isoequilibrium temperature Tiso, when the Langmuir constant are equal for all surface sites, i. e. the surface is ho- mogeneous over these constants. It has been shown that logarithm of the Langmuir constant for HCs decreases with reduc- ing the adsorption energy as the surface coverage of Silica Gel increases and compensation effect has been observed [36]. Such relationship be- tween EA and ln K0 is displayed in Fig. 7 for CH3I/Carbosil system. 30 35 40 45 50 55 15 16 17 18 ln K 0 , Pa-1 E A , kJ mole-1 Fig. 7. Variation of the Langmuir constant versus adsorption energy for the CH3I/Carbosil system The approaches based on the distribution moments theory and condensation approximation have been proposed to evaluate parameters of this dependence from the adsorption data and the cal- culation has been performed for the adsorption of chloromethanes series (CHnCl4-n, n = 0÷3) and methyl iodide on Silica Gel and Carbosil surface [36]. For example, K0(iso) = 8.7·103 Pa-1 and Tiso = 700 K were obtained for the CH3I/Carbosil system. The range of the Langmuir constants at several coverages exceeds noticeably ones calcu- lated by Eq. (24): ln K0(calc) = 12.2 – 12.8 Pa-1 for the chloromethanes series on Silica Gel and the experimental ln K0(exp) values varied from 5.7 to 20.8 Pa-1 as the relative surface coverage falls from 1.0 to 0. These variations should be taken into account in the calculations of the ρ(EA) func- tion from the adsorption data. V.I. Bogillo, M.S. Bazylevska, B.G. Mischanchuk, V.A. Pokrovskiy _____________________________________________________________________________________________ 412 ХФТП 2010. Т. 1. № 4 Atmospheric implications. As it follows from above TPD MS and IGC data, the surfaces of components of atmospheric mineral and carbona- ceous aerosols are energetically heterogeneous. Only Langmurian adsorption equilibrium on the homogeneous surfaces (or its initial linear part of the isotherms, i. e. Henry region) is considered in current models of heterogeneous atmospheric chem- istry [37]. The approximation of homogeneous sur- face may overestimate the partition coefficients and adsorption enthalpies, since these quantities usually calculated from adsorption measurements in the Henry region, i. e., under conditions where only the strongest adsorption sites are involved. The fraction of such active sites at the surface of atmospheric particles can be extremely small, and, therefore, these quantities are not suitable for describing the activity of their surface as a whole. The surface of the atmospheric solid aerosols is chemically and structurally heterogeneous [7, 38], which can be explained by its containing many types of adsorption sites with various activi- ties, by difference in the topography of such sites and by the specifics of the amorphous structure of the surface layer and porous structure of the parti- cles. Therefore, the partitioning of HCs and other volatile impurities between the surface of aerosol particles and air is convenient to calculate within the framework of the above approaches developed for describing the adsorption of species from the gas phase on a heterogeneous solid surface. The proposed approach (Eqs. (21), (26)–(28)) makes possible to estimate the volatile structure, the tem- perature influence the partition coefficients and the surface concentrations on the aerosol particles. Acknowledgements. This study was sup- ported by National Science Foundation of USA (COBASE program) and by Science and Tech- nology Center in Ukraine (project #2196). The authors are grateful to Prof. R. Leboda (Maria Curie-Sklodowska University, Lublin, Poland) for courteously providing Carbosil sample. REFERENCES 1. The Handbook of Environmental Chemistry / Ed. P. Fabian, O.N. Singh. – V. 4, Part E. Re- active Halogen Compounds in the Atmos- phere – Heidelberg, Germany: Springer, 1999. – 221 p. 2. Solomon S. Stratospheric ozone depletion: a review of concept and history // Rev. Geo- phys. – 1999. – V. 37, N 3. – P. 275–316. 3. Robinson G.N., Freedman A., Kolb C.E., Worsnop D.R. Decomposition of ha- lomethanes on α-alumina at stratospheric temperature // Geophys. Res. Lett. – 1994. – V. 21. – P. 377–380. 4. Kutsuna S., Takeuchi K., Ibusuki T. Labora- tory study on heterogeneous degradation of methyl chloroform (CH3CCl3) on alumi- nosilica clay minerals as its potential tropo- spheric sink // J. Geophys. Res. – 2000. – V. 105. – P. 6611–6620. 5. Zakharenko V.S., Parmon V.N. Remediation of the Earth’s atmosphere throgh photoiniti- ated destruction of freons on the alkaline earth oxide components of tropospheric aero- sols // Colloid. Surf. A. – 1999. – V. 151. – P. 367–376. 6. Isidorov V.A. Organic chemistry of the At- mosphere. – St. Petersburg: Khimizdat, 2001. – 351 p. 7. Bogillo V.I. Impact of mineral aerosols com- position on the kinetics of the heterogeneous fate of trace volatiles from atmosphere // Chem. Phys. Technol. Surf. – 2010. – V. 1. – N 1. – P. 36–47. 8. Bogillo V.I., Bazylevska M.S., Borchers R. Past and future for ozone-depleting halo- carbons in Antarctic environment // Role of Interfaces in Environmental Protection NATO Sci. Ser. (IV. Earth Environ. Sci. V. 24) / Ed. S. Barany. – Dordrecht: Kluwer Acad. Publ., 2003. – P. 161–168. 9. Bogillo V.I., Borchers R., Bazylevska M.S. Formation and sinks of volatile trace com- pounds in coastal Antarctica // Terra Nostra. – 2004. – V. 4. – P. 109–110. 10. Keppler F., Eiden R., Nirdan V. et al. Halo- carbons produced by natural oxidation processes during degradation of organic matter // Nature. – 2000. – V. 403. – P. 298–301. 11. Carpenter L.J., Hopkins J.R., Jones C.E. et al. Abiotic source of reactive organic halogens in the Sub-Arctic atmosphere? // Environ. Sci. Technol. – 2005. – V. 39, N 22. – P. 8812–8816. 12. Stroebe M., Scheringer M., Held H., Hunger- bühler K. Inter-comparison of multimedia modelling approaches: modes of transport, measures of long range transport potential and the spatial remote state // Sci. Total Envi- ron. – 2004. – V. 321. – P. 1–20. Partitioning of Volatile Halocarbons between Surrogates for Atmospheric Solid Aerosols and Gas Phase _____________________________________________________________________________________________ ХФТП 2010. Т. 1. № 4 413 13. Kawasaki N., Tanada S., Nakamura T., Abe I. The recovery of chlorofluorocarbons and chlorofluorocarbon replacements by surface modified activated carbon // J. Colloid. Inter- face Sci. – 1995. – V. 172. – P. 368–373. 14. Kovalchuk V.I., d’Itri J.L. Catalytic chemistry of chloro- and chlorofluorocarbon dehaloge- nation: from macroscopic observations to molecular level understanding // Appl. Catal. A. – 2004. – V. 271. – P. 13–25. 15. Howe R.F. Zeolite catalysts for dehalogena- tion processes // Appl. Catal. A. – 2004. – V. 271. – P. 3–11. 16. Bogillo V.I., Shkilev V.P., Voelkel A. Deter- mination of surface free energy components for heterogeneous solids by means of inverse gas chromatography at finite concentra- tions // J. Mat. Chem. – 1998. – V. 8, N 9. – P. 1953–1961. 17. Pokrovskiy V.A. Temperature-programmed desorption mass spectrometry (TPD MS) of dispersed oxides // Adsorpt. Sci. Technol. – 1997. – V. 14, N 5. – Р. 301–317. 18. Reid R., Prausnitz J.M., Sherwood T. The Properties of Gases and Liquids / 3rd ed. – New Tork: McGraw-Hill, 1977. – 576 p. 19. Pokrovskiy V.A., Bogillo V.I., Dabrowski A. Ad- sorption and chemisorption of organic pollutants on the solid aerosols surface // Adsorption and its Application in Industry and Environmental Pro- tection / Ed. A. Dabrowski. – Amsterdam: El- sevier, 1999. – P. 571–634. 20. Turov V.V., Leboda R., Bogillo V.I., Skubish- ewska-Zieba J. Adsorption of water on the surface of mesoporous silicas and carbosils as examined by 1H nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy // Langmuir. – 1997. – V. 13, N 5. – P. 1237–1244. 21. Conder J.D., Young C.L. Physicochemical Measurements by Gas Chromatography. – New York: Wiley, 1979. – 267 p. 22. Balard H. Estimation of the surface energetic heterogeneity of a solid by inverse gas chro- matography // Langmuir. – 1997. – V. 13, N 5. – P. 1260–1269. 23. Zhdanov V.P. Elementary Physicochemical Processes on the Surface. – Novosibirsk: Nauka, 1988. – 319 p. (in Russian). 24. Bogillo V.I., Pirnach L.S., Dabrowski A. Monte Carlo simulation of silica surface dehydroxyla- tion under nonisothermal conditions // Lang- muir. – 1997. – V. 13, N 5. – P. 928–935. 25. Bogillo V I., Staszczuk P. Characterization of the structural and energetic heterogeneity of mesoporous solid surfaces from Q-DTG data // J. Therm. Anal. Calorim. – 1999. – V. 55, N 2. – P. 493–510. 26. deJong A.M., Niemantsverdriet J.W. Thermal desorption analysis: comparative test of ten commonly applied procedures // Surf. Sci. – 1990. – V. 233. – P. 355–365. 27. Rudzinski W., Borowiecki T., Panczyk T., Dominko A. On the applicability of Arrhenius plot methods to determine surface energetic het- erogeneity of adsorbents and catalysts surfaces from experimental TPD spectra // Adv. Colloid Interfaces Sci. – 2000. – V. 84. – P. 1–26. 28. Bazylevska M.S., Bogillo V.I. Description of air/surface partitioning for volatile organic pollutants in Antarctic environment // Role of Interfaces in Environmental Protection NATO Sci. Ser. (IV. Earth Environ. Sci. V. 24) / Ed. S. Barany. – Dordrecht: Kluwer Acad. Publ., 2003. – P. 153–160. 29. CRC Handbook of Chemistry and Physics / 77th ed. – Boca Raton: CRC. – 1996. – 1539 p. 30. Abraham M.H., Andonian-Haftvan J., Whiting G.S., Leo A. Hydrogen bonding. Part 34. The factors that influence the solubility of gases and vapours in water at 298 K, and a new method for its determination // J. Chem. Soc. Perkin Trans. II. – 1994. – P. 1777–1791. 31. Su B.-L., Norberg V. Quantitative characteriza- tion of H-mordenite zeolite structure by infrared spectroscopy using benzene adsorption // Col- loids Surf. – 2001. – V. 187–188. – P. 311–318. 32. Jaroniec M., Madey R. Physical Adsorption on Heterogeneous Solids. – Amsterdam: El- sevier, 1988. – 351 P. 33. Bogillo V.I., Shkilev V.P. Evaluation of de- sorption energy distributions from TPD spec- tra on a heterogeneous solid surface // J. Therm. Anal. Calorim. – 1999. – V. 55, N 2. – P. 483–492. 34. Bogillo V.I. Kinetics of organic compounds chemisorption from gas phase on oxide sur- faces // Adsorption on New and Modified In- organic Sorbents / Ed. A. Dabrowski, V.A. Tertykh. – Amsterdam: Elsevier, 1996. – P. 135–184. 35. Liu L., Guo O.-X. Isokinetic relationship, iso- equilibrium relationship, and enthalpy- entropy compensation // Chem. Rev. – 2001. – V. 101. – P. 673–695. V.I. Bogillo, M.S. Bazylevska, B.G. Mischanchuk, V.A. Pokrovskiy _____________________________________________________________________________________________ 414 ХФТП 2010. Т. 1. № 4 36. Bogillo V.I., Bazylevska M.S. Compensation effect in adsorption on heterogeneous solid surface // Ukr. Khim. Zh. – 2006. – V. 72, N 8. – P. 78–84. 37. Crowley J.N., Ammann M., Cox R.A. et al. Evaluated kinetic and photochemical data for atmospheric chemistry: Volume V – Heterogeneous reactions on solid sub- strates // Atmos. Chem. Phys. Discuss. – 2010. – V. 10. – P. 5233–5564. 38. Bogillo V.I. The particle morphology effect of atmospheric aerosols on the interaction kinetics with volatile impurities // Chem. Phys. Technol. Surf. – 2010. – V. 1. N. 2. – P. 148–165. (in Russian). Received 16.06.2010, accepted 06.09.2010 Дослідження розподілу легколетких галогенвуглеводнів між сурогатами атмосферних твердих аерозолів і газовою фазою методами ТПД МС і оберненої газової хроматографії В.Й. Богилло, М.С. Базилевська, Б.Г. Місчанчук, В.О. Покровський Відділ геології та геоекології Антарктики, Інститут геологічних наук Національної академії наук України вул. Олеся Гончара 55Б, Київ 01054, Україна, vbog@carrier.kiev.ua Інститут хімії поверхні ім. О.О. Чуйка Національної академії наук України вул. Генерала Наумова 17, Київ 03164, Україна Кінетика неізотермичної десорбції попередньо адсорбованих Cl, Br і I-вмістних галогенвуглеводнів (ГВ) з поверхні сурогатів атмосферних твердих аерозолів (пірогенні кремнезем і оксид алюмінію, силікагель і Н-морденіт) вивчена методом температурно-програмованої десорбційної мас-спектрометрії (ТПД МС). ТПД спектри демонструють високу неоднорідність вивчених поверхонь. Розраховані середні величини енергії активації десорбції та півширини прямокутних розподілів енергій десорбції ГВ. Отримані співвідношення між середніми енергіями активації десорб- ції ГВ і їх молекулярними дескрипторами для всіх вивчених твердих тіл. Розподіл ГВ і додаткових летких органічних сполук між сурогатами мінеральних і вуглецьвмісних атмосферних аерозолів (сілікагель, Карбопак і Карбосіл) дослі- джено методом оберненої газової хроматографії (ОГХ). Дані ОГХ вказують на енергетичну неоднорідність повер- хні цих твердих тіл. Розраховані середні величини енергії адсорбції ГВ і дисперсії прямокутного розподілу поверхонь по енергіям адсорбції та знайдені зв’язки між цими величинами та молекулярними дескрипторами цих летких спо- лук. Встановлено співвідношення між середніми енергіями активації десорбції ГВ з силікагелю з даних ТПД МС і середніми енергіями адсорбції в цих системах, визначеними з даних ОГХ при скінченних концентраціях. Исследование распределения легколетучих галогенуглеводородов между суррогатами атмосферных твердых аэрозолей и газовой фазой методами ТПД МС и обращенной газовой хроматографии В.И. Богилло, М.С. Базилевская, Б.Г. Мисчанчук, В.А. Покровский Отдел геологии и геоэкологии Антарктики, Институт геологических наук Национальной академии наук Украины ул. Олеся Гончара 55Б, Киев 01054,Украина, vbog@carrier.kiev.ua Институт химии поверхности им. А.А. Чуйко Национальной академии наук Украины ул. Генерала Наумова 17, Киев 03164, Украина Кинетика неизотермической десорбции предварительно адсорбированных Cl, Br и I-содержащих га- логенуглеводородов (ГУ) с поверхности суррогатов атмосферных твердых аэрозолей (пирогенные кремне- зем и окись алюминия, силикагель и Н-морденит) изучена методом температурно-программированной де- сорбционной масс-спектрометрии (ТПД МС). ТПД спектры демонстрируют высокую неоднородность изу- ченных поверхностей. Рассчитаны средние значения энергии активации десорбции и полуширины прямо- угольных распределений энергий десорбции ГУ. Получены соотношения между средними величинами энергии активации десорбции ГУ и их молекулярными дескрипторами для всех изученных твердых тел. Распределе- ние ГУ и добавочных летучих органических соединений между суррогатами минеральных и углеродсодер- жащих атмосферных аэрозолей (силикагель, Карбопак и Карбосил) исследовано методом обращенной газо- вой хроматографии (ОГХ). Данные ОГХ указывают на энергетическую неоднородность поверхности этих твердых тел. Рассчитаны средние энергиии адсорбции ГУ и дисперсии прямоугольного распределения по- верхностей по энергиям адсорбции и найдены связи между этими величинами и молекулярными дескрипто- рами летучих соединений. Установлено соотношение между средними энергиями активации десорбции ГУ с силикагеля из данных ТПД МС и средними энергиями адсорбции в этих системах, определенными из данных ОГХ при конечных концентрациях.
id nasplib_isofts_kiev_ua-123456789-29023
institution Digital Library of Periodicals of National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine
issn 2079-1704
language English
last_indexed 2025-12-07T18:21:13Z
publishDate 2010
publisher Інститут хімії поверхні ім. О.О. Чуйка НАН України
record_format dspace
spelling Bogillo, V.I.
Bazylevska, M.S.
Mischanchuk, B.G.
Pokrovskiy, V.A.
2011-11-28T21:28:47Z
2011-11-28T21:28:47Z
2010
Partitioning of Volatile Halocarbons between Surrogates for Atmospheric Solid Aerosols and Gas Phase as Examined by TPD MS and Inverse Gas Chromatography / V.I. Bogillo, M.S. Bazylevska, B.G. Mischanchuk, V.A. Pokrovskiy // Хімія, фізика та технологія поверхні. — 2010. — Т. 1, № 4. — С. 401-414. — Бібліогр.: 38 назв. — англ.
2079-1704
https://nasplib.isofts.kiev.ua/handle/123456789/29023
544.723.3:543.51+543.544:543.27:544.772
The desorption non-isothermal kinetics of preliminary adsorbed Cl, Br, and I-containing volatile halocarbons from the surface of surrogates for atmospheric solid aerosols (fumed silica and alumina, silica gel and H-mordenite) was studied by TPD MS. The TPD spectra demonstrate high heterogeneity of the surface studied. The average desorption activation energies and half-widths of the halocarbons desorption energy rectangular distribution were calculated. The relationships between the average desorption activation energies and molecular descriptors for the halocarbons were derived for the solids. The partitioning of the halocarbons and additional volatile organics between surrogates for mineral and carbonaceous atmospheric aerosols (silica gel, Carbopack S, Carbosil) was examined by using the inverse gas chromatography method. These data indicate to the energetic heterogeneity of the solid surfaces. The average adsorption energies and variances of the adsorption energy rectangular distribution were calculated and connected with molecular descriptors of the volatiles. A relationship is observed between average desorption activation energies of halocarbons on the silica gel surface from TPD MS data and average adsorption energies in these systems determined using inverse gas chromatography method at finite concentrations.
Кінетика неізотермичної десорбції попередньо адсорбованих Cl, Br і I-вмістних галогенвуглеводнів (ГВ) з поверхні сурогатів атмосферних твердих аерозолів (пірогенні кремнезем і оксид алюмінію, силікагель і Н-морденіт) вивчена методом температурно-програмованої десорбційної мас-спектрометрії (ТПД МС). ТПД спектри демонструють високу неоднорідність вивчених поверхонь. Розраховані середні величини енергії активації десорбції та півширини прямокутних розподілів енергій десорбції ГВ. Отримані співвідношення між середніми енергіями активації десорбції ГВ і їх молекулярними дескрипторами для всіх вивчених твердих тіл. Розподіл ГВ і додаткових летких органічних сполук між сурогатами мінеральних і вуглецьвмісних атмосферних аерозолів (сілікагель, Карбопак і Карбосіл) досліджено методом оберненої газової хроматографії (ОГХ). Дані ОГХ вказують на енергетичну неоднорідність поверхні цих твердих тіл. Розраховані середні величини енергії адсорбції ГВ і дисперсії прямокутного розподілу поверхонь по енергіям адсорбції та знайдені зв’язки між цими величинами та молекулярними дескрипторами цих летких сполук. Встановлено співвідношення між середніми енергіями активації десорбції ГВ з силікагелю з даних ТПД МС і середніми енергіями адсорбції в цих системах, визначеними з даних ОГХ при скінченних концентраціях.
Кинетика неизотермической десорбции предварительно адсорбированных Cl, Br и I-содержащих галогенуглеводородов (ГУ) с поверхности суррогатов атмосферных твердых аэрозолей (пирогенные кремнезем и окись алюминия, силикагель и Н-морденит) изучена методом температурно-программированной десорбционной масс-спектрометрии (ТПД МС). ТПД спектры демонстрируют высокую неоднородность изученных поверхностей. Рассчитаны средние значения энергии активации десорбции и полуширины прямоугольных распределений энергий десорбции ГУ. Получены соотношения между средними величинами энергии активации десорбции ГУ и их молекулярными дескрипторами для всех изученных твердых тел. Распределение ГУ и добавочных летучих органических соединений между суррогатами минеральных и углеродсодержащих атмосферных аэрозолей (силикагель, Карбопак и Карбосил) исследовано методом обращенной газовой хроматографии (ОГХ). Данные ОГХ указывают на энергетическую неоднородность поверхности этих твердых тел. Рассчитаны средние энергиии адсорбции ГУ и дисперсии прямоугольного распределения поверхностей по энергиям адсорбции и найдены связи между этими величинами и молекулярными дескрипторами летучих соединений. Установлено соотношение между средними энергиями активации десорбции ГУ с силикагеля из данных ТПД МС и средними энергиями адсорбции в этих системах, определенными из данных ОГХ при конечных концентрациях.
This study was supported by National Science Foundation of USA (COBASE program) and by Science and Technology Center in Ukraine (project #2196). The authors are grateful to Prof. R. Leboda (Maria Curie-Sklodowska University, Lublin, Poland) for courteously providing Carbosil sample.
en
Інститут хімії поверхні ім. О.О. Чуйка НАН України
Хімія, фізика та технологія поверхні
Partitioning of Volatile Halocarbons between Surrogates for Atmospheric Solid Aerosols and Gas Phase as Examined by TPD MS and Inverse Gas Chromatography
Дослідження розподілу легколетких галогенвуглеводнів між сурогатами атмосферних твердих аерозолів і газовою фазою методами ТПД МС і оберненої газової хроматографії
Исследование распределения легколетучих галогенуглеводородов между суррогатами атмосферных твердых аэрозолей и газовой фазой методами ТПД МС и обращенной газовой хроматографии
Article
published earlier
spellingShingle Partitioning of Volatile Halocarbons between Surrogates for Atmospheric Solid Aerosols and Gas Phase as Examined by TPD MS and Inverse Gas Chromatography
Bogillo, V.I.
Bazylevska, M.S.
Mischanchuk, B.G.
Pokrovskiy, V.A.
title Partitioning of Volatile Halocarbons between Surrogates for Atmospheric Solid Aerosols and Gas Phase as Examined by TPD MS and Inverse Gas Chromatography
title_alt Дослідження розподілу легколетких галогенвуглеводнів між сурогатами атмосферних твердих аерозолів і газовою фазою методами ТПД МС і оберненої газової хроматографії
Исследование распределения легколетучих галогенуглеводородов между суррогатами атмосферных твердых аэрозолей и газовой фазой методами ТПД МС и обращенной газовой хроматографии
title_full Partitioning of Volatile Halocarbons between Surrogates for Atmospheric Solid Aerosols and Gas Phase as Examined by TPD MS and Inverse Gas Chromatography
title_fullStr Partitioning of Volatile Halocarbons between Surrogates for Atmospheric Solid Aerosols and Gas Phase as Examined by TPD MS and Inverse Gas Chromatography
title_full_unstemmed Partitioning of Volatile Halocarbons between Surrogates for Atmospheric Solid Aerosols and Gas Phase as Examined by TPD MS and Inverse Gas Chromatography
title_short Partitioning of Volatile Halocarbons between Surrogates for Atmospheric Solid Aerosols and Gas Phase as Examined by TPD MS and Inverse Gas Chromatography
title_sort partitioning of volatile halocarbons between surrogates for atmospheric solid aerosols and gas phase as examined by tpd ms and inverse gas chromatography
url https://nasplib.isofts.kiev.ua/handle/123456789/29023
work_keys_str_mv AT bogillovi partitioningofvolatilehalocarbonsbetweensurrogatesforatmosphericsolidaerosolsandgasphaseasexaminedbytpdmsandinversegaschromatography
AT bazylevskams partitioningofvolatilehalocarbonsbetweensurrogatesforatmosphericsolidaerosolsandgasphaseasexaminedbytpdmsandinversegaschromatography
AT mischanchukbg partitioningofvolatilehalocarbonsbetweensurrogatesforatmosphericsolidaerosolsandgasphaseasexaminedbytpdmsandinversegaschromatography
AT pokrovskiyva partitioningofvolatilehalocarbonsbetweensurrogatesforatmosphericsolidaerosolsandgasphaseasexaminedbytpdmsandinversegaschromatography
AT bogillovi doslídžennârozpodílulegkoletkihgalogenvuglevodnívmížsurogatamiatmosfernihtverdihaerozolívígazovoûfazoûmetodamitpdmsíobernenoígazovoíhromatografíí
AT bazylevskams doslídžennârozpodílulegkoletkihgalogenvuglevodnívmížsurogatamiatmosfernihtverdihaerozolívígazovoûfazoûmetodamitpdmsíobernenoígazovoíhromatografíí
AT mischanchukbg doslídžennârozpodílulegkoletkihgalogenvuglevodnívmížsurogatamiatmosfernihtverdihaerozolívígazovoûfazoûmetodamitpdmsíobernenoígazovoíhromatografíí
AT pokrovskiyva doslídžennârozpodílulegkoletkihgalogenvuglevodnívmížsurogatamiatmosfernihtverdihaerozolívígazovoûfazoûmetodamitpdmsíobernenoígazovoíhromatografíí
AT bogillovi issledovanieraspredeleniâlegkoletučihgalogenuglevodorodovmeždusurrogatamiatmosfernyhtverdyhaérozoleiigazovoifazoimetodamitpdmsiobraŝennoigazovoihromatografii
AT bazylevskams issledovanieraspredeleniâlegkoletučihgalogenuglevodorodovmeždusurrogatamiatmosfernyhtverdyhaérozoleiigazovoifazoimetodamitpdmsiobraŝennoigazovoihromatografii
AT mischanchukbg issledovanieraspredeleniâlegkoletučihgalogenuglevodorodovmeždusurrogatamiatmosfernyhtverdyhaérozoleiigazovoifazoimetodamitpdmsiobraŝennoigazovoihromatografii
AT pokrovskiyva issledovanieraspredeleniâlegkoletučihgalogenuglevodorodovmeždusurrogatamiatmosfernyhtverdyhaérozoleiigazovoifazoimetodamitpdmsiobraŝennoigazovoihromatografii