Principles of forest types classification and forest management planning methods of the Czech Republic and their implementation for Ukrainian Carpathians
Analysis of the Czech experience gives a chance to implement their principles of the forest type classification for the Ukrainian Carpathians forests. Forestry action planning within forestry complexes is possible for 18–20 groups of forest types. The introduction of this planning system would signi...
Saved in:
| Published in: | Науково-виробниче видання “Лісовий журнал” |
|---|---|
| Date: | 2011 |
| Main Authors: | , |
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Український ордена "Знак Пошани" НДІ лісового господарства та агролісомеліорації ім. Г.М. Висоцького Держкомлісгоспу та НАН України
2011
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://nasplib.isofts.kiev.ua/handle/123456789/38844 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| Journal Title: | Digital Library of Periodicals of National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine |
| Cite this: | Principles of forest types classification and forest management planning methods of the Czech Republic and their implementation for Ukrainian Carpathians / O. Holusha, V. Parpan // Науково-виробниче видання “Лісовий журнал”. — 2011. — №. 1. — С. 42-44. — Бібліогр.: 9 назв. — англ. |
Institution
Digital Library of Periodicals of National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine| _version_ | 1860239408363470848 |
|---|---|
| author | Holusha, O. Parpan, V. |
| author_facet | Holusha, O. Parpan, V. |
| citation_txt | Principles of forest types classification and forest management planning methods of the Czech Republic and their implementation for Ukrainian Carpathians / O. Holusha, V. Parpan // Науково-виробниче видання “Лісовий журнал”. — 2011. — №. 1. — С. 42-44. — Бібліогр.: 9 назв. — англ. |
| collection | DSpace DC |
| container_title | Науково-виробниче видання “Лісовий журнал” |
| description | Analysis of the Czech experience gives a chance to implement their principles of the forest type classification for the Ukrainian Carpathians forests. Forestry action planning within forestry complexes is possible for 18–20 groups of forest types. The introduction of this planning system would significantly increase the area of managed forests in the region.
Анализ чешского опыта позволил сделать вывод о возможности применения их принципов классификации типов леса для условий Украинских Карпат. Планирование мероприятий по ведению лесного хозяйства в разрезе хозяйственных комплексов возможно для 18–20 групп типов леса. Внедрение такой системы планирования существенно увеличит площадь лесов хозяйственного предназначения.
|
| first_indexed | 2025-12-07T18:28:01Z |
| format | Article |
| fulltext |
42 ЛІСОВИЙ ЖУРНАЛ, 1/2011
УДК 630*094.4+630*23+630*3+630*62
PRINCIPLES OF FOREST TYPES CLASSIFICATION
AND FOREST MANAGEMENT PLANNING METHODS
OF THE CZECH REPUBLIC AND THEIR IMPLEMENTATION
FOR UKRAINIAN CARPATHIANS
O. HOLUSHA, PhD
Вranch Fridek Mistek of Czech Institute for
Forest Management (UHUL);
V. I. PARPAN, Prof., Y. S. SHPARYK, Dr.
Ukrainian Research Institute for Mountain
Forestry.
Analysis of the Czech experience gives a
chance to implement their principles of the forest
type classification for the Ukrainian Carpathians
forests. Forestry action planning within forestry
complexes is possible for 18–20 groups of forest
types. The introduction of this planning system
would significantly increase the area of managed
forests in the region.
Keywords: classification, forest type, forestry
complexes, silvicultural actions.
The main tasks of forestry are the sustainable use
of forests for obtaining the maximum volume of wood
and byproducts per hectare, improving forest health
and timber quality, and conservation, using, and re-
storing multifaceted functions of forests. Success-
ful completion of these tasks is possible under forest
management based on forest typologies. In the clas-
sification of Ukrainian Carpathians’ forest types used
typological principles of Pogrebnyak P. S., and Vorob-
jov D. V., which were adapted to mountainous condi-
tions by Ostapenko B. F., Shevchenko S. V., Fedets’
I. P., Molotkov P. I., Pasternak P. S., Gerushynskyj Z.,
et al. The result of detailed soil typological survey of
the region during 1960-th years was inventory of for-
est types in the Ukrainian Carpathians [1]. In practice
it fined out that the forestry planning has to be done
within groups of forest types. Similar groups were
proposed by Holubets’ M. A., Herushynskyj Z. Y., Sto-
jko S. M., Parpan V. I. [1-4].
Principles of forest type classification and meth-
ods of forest management planning in the Czech Re-
public are close to Ukrainian. For possible use of the
Czech experience a joint research in «Nadvirna For-
estry» enterprise and in «Gorgany» Natural Reserve
was done. Work within international project «System
of forest management in forest ecosystems in the
Ukrainian Carpathians» held last six years and end-
ed in 2010. Their main results are prepared methods
of differentiated planning of forest management, in
cluding: forest management actions within of forest
type groups; the use of satellite images for mapping
of forests; planning of ecological network for forest
areas; identification of natural habitat in the Ukrainian
Carpathians forests [5].
Planning of forestry in the Czech Republic based
on the forest type classification of Pliva (1991), devel-
oped on the basis of biogeocenological system of Prof.
Zlatnyk (1976). According to this classification gives 7
main series of soil conditions (extreme, acid, mezotro-
phic, megatrophic, gleyed, flooded, and peaty) and 10
altitude stages of vegetation (Table 1). Forest type is
determined according to the vegetation stage and to
the soil conditions [6–9]. For example, the index of the
forest type «5A» has a name «fir beech forests on stony
megatrophic soils».
In the field determining the forest types indexes
are clearer. To the vegetation stage number research-
ers should add a soil series index, a number of the
hydrological conditions, and specific notes. For ex-
ample, most common forest type on the pilot project
area in the Ukrainian Carpathians according to the
Czech classification has index 5B3e and name – «fir
beech forests normal watering on the slopes». For the
planning of forest management similar forest types
within a one (maximum – two adjacent) vegetative
stage together in forestry complexes [5]. Forest man-
agement actions for the most common forest type on
the project pilot area processed on the base of the
field study results (Table 2) confirm a reasonability of
their applications in the mountain forests of the Ukrai-
nian Carpathians.
Table 1
Classification of the forest type groups in the Czech Republic (Pliva, 1991)
FSC* Extreme
(X,Z,Y)
Acid
(M,K,N,I)
Mezotrophic
(S,F,C,B,W,H)
Megatro phic
(D,J,A,L,U,V)
Gleyed
(O,P,Q)
Flooded
(T,G) Peaty (R)
VS**
altitude stages of vegetation
9 – Moun tain
Pine 9Z,9Y 9K – – – – 9R
8 – Norway
Spruce 8Z,8Y 8M,8K,8N 8S,8F 8A,8V 8O,8P,
8Q 8T,8G 8R
43ЛІСОВИЙ ЖУРНАЛ, 1/2011
FSC* Extreme
(X,Z,Y)
Acid
(M,K,N,I)
Mezotrophic
(S,F,C,B,W,H)
Megatro phic
(D,J,A,L,U,V)
Gleyed
(O,P,Q)
Flooded
(T,G) Peaty (R)
VS**
altitude stages of vegetation
7 – Beech-
Spruce 7Z,7Y 7M,7K,7N 7S,7F,7B 7V 7O,7P,
7Q 7T,7G 7R
6 – Spruce-
Beech 6Z,6Y 6M,6K,
6N,6I 6S,6F,6B,6H 6D,6A,6J,
6L,6V
6O,6P,
6Q 6T,6G 6R
5 – Silver
Fir-Beech 5Z,5Y 5M,5K,
5N,5I
5S,5F,5C,
5B,5W,5H
5D,5A,5J,
5L,5U,5V
5O,5P,
5Q 5T,5G 5R
4 – Com mon
Beech 4X,4Z,4Y 4M,4K,
4N,4I
4S,4F,4C,
4B,4W,4H 4D,4A,4V 4O,4P,
4Q 4G 4R
3 – Oak- Beech 3X,3Z,3Y 3M,3K,
3N,3I
3S,3F,3C,
3B,3W,3H
3D,3A,3J,
3L,3U,3V
3O,3P,
3Q 3T,3G 3R
2 – Beech-Oak 2X,2Z,2Y 2M,2K,
2N,2I
2S,2C,2B,
2W,2H
2D,2A,2J,
2L,2V
2O,2P,
2Q 2T,2G –
1 – Oak 2X,2Z 1M,1K,
1N,1I 1S,1C,B, 1W,1H 1D,1A,1J,
1L,1U,1V
1O,1P,
1Q 1T,1G –
azonal vegetation stage
0 – Scotch pine 0X,0Z,0Y 0M,0K,0N 0C – 0O,0P,
0Q 0T,0G 0R
* FSC – forest site (soil) conditions, ** VS – vegetation stages.
Table 2
Forest management action plan for the forestry complex No. 51 «Disadvantageous site conditions»
Complex No.
51
Name:DISADVANTAGEOUS SITE CONDITIONS
(exposed site conditions on high altitude – steep slopes, rock deposits;
sandstones, argillites)
Area:
5991
га 62,4%
Forest types: 5, 6; А, АВ, В, ВС, С, ВD, СD; 3, 3-4, 3-5, 4, n, e, f
Main forest species*: РА, АА, FS Secondary forest species: -
Basic species composition**: РА 3-6, FS 2-4, АА 1-3, APS 0-2
MAIN FORESTRY ACTIONS:
Minimal part of
melioration and stable
species,%:
Melioration and stable
species *: Economic type: Forestry method:
30 FS, АА, APS, U, T High stem seed-culturalforest strip-grandual felling, natural
regeneration
FORESTRY ACTIONS WITHIN STAND TYPES:
Stand 5111 – Norway spruce 512 – Silver fir 516 – Common beech
Basic forestry
reccomenda-
tions
Age of
felling:
110
Period of
restoration:
30
Age of
felling:
120
Period of
restoration:
40
Age of
felling:
130
Period of
restoration:
40
Start of
restora-
tion:
91
Forestry method:
strip-grandual
felling, natural
regeneration
Start of
restora-
tion:
91
Forestry method:
grandual
felling, natural
regeneration
Start of
restora-
tion:
121
Forestry method:
strip-grandual
felling, natural
regeneration
Dominant height
of stand 30–40 m 28–34 m 26–32 m
Natural regene-
ration success
Spruce – below middle, Fir
and Beech – middle
Fir – under middle, Beech –
middle, Spruce – low
Beech – middle, Spruce – low,
Fir – under middle
Forest tending:
– plantations Trend on quality Trend on quality Trend on quality
– young stands Felling for negative
characteristics
Felling for negative
characteristics, Beech and
Spruce tending
Felling for negative
characteristics, Maple, Fir, and
Spruce tending
– close to ripe
stands
Felling for positive
characteristics from upper
level
Felling for positive
characteristics,Beech and
Spruce tending
Felling for positive
characteristics, Maple, Fir, and
Spruce tending
Recommended
technology track-type tractors, cable-transport systems
* – species: РА – Norway Spruce, АА – Silver Fir, FS – Common Beech, APS – Maple, U – Elm, T – Lime-tree.
44 ЛІСОВИЙ ЖУРНАЛ, 1/2011
ВИСНОВКИ
1. Методичні засади класифікації типів лісу
Чеської Республіки можна застосовувати при опра-
цюванні систем диференційованого ведення лісо-
вого господарства в Українських Карпатах, а лісо-
господарські заходи – з урахуванням української
еколого-лісівничої класифікації.
2. Європейська практика розв’язання пробле-
ми ґрунтується на основі господарських комплек-
сів, для яких складений перелік лісогосподарських
заходів в розрізі існуючих типів деревостанів. Роз-
робка системи господарських комплексів в лісово-
му господарстві регіону повинна включати 18–20
господарських групах типах лісу, що об’єднуються
за фітоценотичним принципом.
CONCLUSIONS
1. Czech Republic methodical principles of forest
type classification can be used for preparing a system
for differentiated forest management in the Ukrainian
Carpathians, and forest management action plans – on
a base of Ukrainian ecological forest classification.
2. European practice of the problem solution is
based on forestry complexes, which compiled a forest
management action plan within existing stand types
for. The development a system of forestry complexes
in the region should include 18–20 groups of forest
types, which are united by phytocenotic principle.
LIST OF LITERATURE
1. Герушинський З. Ю. Типологія лісів Україн-
ських Карпат. – Львів: Піраміда, 1996. – 208 с.
2. Голубець М. А. Ретроспектива і перспектива
лісової типології. – Львів: Поллі, 2007. – 78 с.
3. Стойко С. М. Дубові ліси Українських Кар-
пат: екологінчі особливості, відтворення, охорона.
– Львів: Меркатор, 2009. – 220 с.
4. Парпан В. И. Структура, динамика,
экологические основы рационального использова-
ния буковых лесов карпатского региона Украины. /
Автореф. дисс. докт. биол. наук за спец. 03.00.16. –
Днепропетровск, 1994. – 42 с.
5. Голуша О., ПарпанВ. И., Шпарик Ю. С. и
др. Инструменты регионального и хозяйственного
лесного планирования для Украины/ Отчёт проекта
No. 134/05-07/MZE/B. – Фридек-Мистек: Леспро-
ект ЧР, 2007. – 198 с.
6. AMBROS Z. 1991: Charakteristiky skupin typů
geobiocénů ČSFR. – Folia Universitatis agriculturae,
VŠZ Brno, Brno. – 94 pp.
7. BUČEK A. & LACINA J. 1999: Geobiocenologie
II. – MZLU v Brně, Brno. – 240 pp.
8. PLÍVA K. 1991: Typologický systém ÚHÚL.
– Ústav pro hospodářskou úpravu lesů Brandýs nad
Labem, Brandýs nad Labem. – 90 pp.
9. ZLATNÍK A. 1976: Lesnická fytocenologie.
Vydání 1. – Státní zemědělské nakladatelství, Praha. –
495 pp.
PRINCIPLES OF FOREST TYPES CLASSIFICATION
AND FOREST MANAGEMENT PLANNING
METHODS OF THE CZECH REPUBLIC AND THEIR
IMPLEMENTATION FOR UKRAINIAN CARPATHIANS
O. HOLUSHA, PhD
Вranch Fridek Mistek of Czech Institute for
Forest Management (UHUL);
V. I. PARPAN, Prof., Y. S. SHPARYK, Dr.
Ukrainian Research Institute for Mountain
Forestry.
Analysis of the Czech experience gives a chance
to implement their principles of the forest type
classification for the Ukrainian Carpathians forests.
Forestry action planning within forestry complexes
is possible for 18-20 groups of forest types. The
introduction of this planning system would significantly
increase the area of managed forests in the region.
Keywords: classification, forest type, forestry
complexes, silvicultural actions.
ПРИНЦИПЫ КЛАССИФИКАЦИИ ТИПОВ ЛЕСА И
МЕТОДЫ ПЛАНИРОВАНИЯ ЛЕСНОГО ХОЗЯЙСТВА
ЧЕШСКОЙ РЕСПУБЛИКИ И ИХ ВНЕДРЕНИЕ В
УКРАИНСКИХ КАРПАТАХ
О. ГОЛУША, д-р наук
Филиал Фридек-Мистек Чешского института
управления лесами
В. И. ПАРПАН, д-р биол. наук, Ю. С. ШПАРИК,
к. с.-х. наук
Украинский научно-исследовательский инсти-
тут горного лесоводства.
Анализ чешского опыта позволил сделать
вывод о возможности применения их принципов
классификации типов леса для условий Украинских
Карпат. Планирование мероприятий по ведению
лесного хозяйства в разрезе хозяйственных комп-
лексов возможно для 18–20 групп типов леса. Вне-
дрение такой системы планирования существен-
но увеличит площадь лесов хозяйственного пред-
назначения.
Ключевые слова: классификация, тип леса,
хозяйственный комплекс, лесоводческие меро-
приятия.
|
| id | nasplib_isofts_kiev_ua-123456789-38844 |
| institution | Digital Library of Periodicals of National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine |
| issn | XXXX-0104 |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2025-12-07T18:28:01Z |
| publishDate | 2011 |
| publisher | Український ордена "Знак Пошани" НДІ лісового господарства та агролісомеліорації ім. Г.М. Висоцького Держкомлісгоспу та НАН України |
| record_format | dspace |
| spelling | Holusha, O. Parpan, V. 2012-11-23T17:18:59Z 2012-11-23T17:18:59Z 2011 Principles of forest types classification and forest management planning methods of the Czech Republic and their implementation for Ukrainian Carpathians / O. Holusha, V. Parpan // Науково-виробниче видання “Лісовий журнал”. — 2011. — №. 1. — С. 42-44. — Бібліогр.: 9 назв. — англ. XXXX-0104 https://nasplib.isofts.kiev.ua/handle/123456789/38844 630*094.4+630*23+630*3+630*62 Analysis of the Czech experience gives a chance to implement their principles of the forest type classification for the Ukrainian Carpathians forests. Forestry action planning within forestry complexes is possible for 18–20 groups of forest types. The introduction of this planning system would significantly increase the area of managed forests in the region. Анализ чешского опыта позволил сделать вывод о возможности применения их принципов классификации типов леса для условий Украинских Карпат. Планирование мероприятий по ведению лесного хозяйства в разрезе хозяйственных комплексов возможно для 18–20 групп типов леса. Внедрение такой системы планирования существенно увеличит площадь лесов хозяйственного предназначения. en Український ордена "Знак Пошани" НДІ лісового господарства та агролісомеліорації ім. Г.М. Висоцького Держкомлісгоспу та НАН України Науково-виробниче видання “Лісовий журнал” Економіка, організація та управління Principles of forest types classification and forest management planning methods of the Czech Republic and their implementation for Ukrainian Carpathians Принципы классификации типов леса и методы планирования лесного хозяйства Чешской Республики и их внедрение в Украинских Карпатах Article published earlier |
| spellingShingle | Principles of forest types classification and forest management planning methods of the Czech Republic and their implementation for Ukrainian Carpathians Holusha, O. Parpan, V. Економіка, організація та управління |
| title | Principles of forest types classification and forest management planning methods of the Czech Republic and their implementation for Ukrainian Carpathians |
| title_alt | Принципы классификации типов леса и методы планирования лесного хозяйства Чешской Республики и их внедрение в Украинских Карпатах |
| title_full | Principles of forest types classification and forest management planning methods of the Czech Republic and their implementation for Ukrainian Carpathians |
| title_fullStr | Principles of forest types classification and forest management planning methods of the Czech Republic and their implementation for Ukrainian Carpathians |
| title_full_unstemmed | Principles of forest types classification and forest management planning methods of the Czech Republic and their implementation for Ukrainian Carpathians |
| title_short | Principles of forest types classification and forest management planning methods of the Czech Republic and their implementation for Ukrainian Carpathians |
| title_sort | principles of forest types classification and forest management planning methods of the czech republic and their implementation for ukrainian carpathians |
| topic | Економіка, організація та управління |
| topic_facet | Економіка, організація та управління |
| url | https://nasplib.isofts.kiev.ua/handle/123456789/38844 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT holushao principlesofforesttypesclassificationandforestmanagementplanningmethodsoftheczechrepublicandtheirimplementationforukrainiancarpathians AT parpanv principlesofforesttypesclassificationandforestmanagementplanningmethodsoftheczechrepublicandtheirimplementationforukrainiancarpathians AT holushao principyklassifikaciitipovlesaimetodyplanirovaniâlesnogohozâistvačešskoirespublikiiihvnedrenievukrainskihkarpatah AT parpanv principyklassifikaciitipovlesaimetodyplanirovaniâlesnogohozâistvačešskoirespublikiiihvnedrenievukrainskihkarpatah |