Exit from an interval by a difference of two renewal processes

Integral transforms of the joint distribution of the first exit time from an interval,
 the value of the overshoot through a boundary, and the value of a linear component
 at the epoch of the exit are determined for the difference of two renewal processes.

Збережено в:
Бібліографічні деталі
Дата:2005
Автор: Kadankov, V.
Формат: Стаття
Мова:Англійська
Опубліковано: Інститут математики НАН України 2005
Онлайн доступ:https://nasplib.isofts.kiev.ua/handle/123456789/4429
Теги: Додати тег
Немає тегів, Будьте першим, хто поставить тег для цього запису!
Назва журналу:Digital Library of Periodicals of National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine
Цитувати:Exit from an interval by a difference of two renewal processes / V. Kadankov // Theory of Stochastic Processes. — 2005. — Т. 11 (27), № 3-4. — С. 92–96. — Бібліогр.: 10 назв.— англ.

Репозитарії

Digital Library of Periodicals of National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine
_version_ 1860146229461123072
author Kadankov, V.
author_facet Kadankov, V.
citation_txt Exit from an interval by a difference of two renewal processes / V. Kadankov // Theory of Stochastic Processes. — 2005. — Т. 11 (27), № 3-4. — С. 92–96. — Бібліогр.: 10 назв.— англ.
collection DSpace DC
description Integral transforms of the joint distribution of the first exit time from an interval,
 the value of the overshoot through a boundary, and the value of a linear component
 at the epoch of the exit are determined for the difference of two renewal processes.
first_indexed 2025-12-07T17:49:58Z
format Article
fulltext Theory of Stochastic Processes Vol. 11 (27), no. 3–4, 2005, pp. 92–96 UDC 519.21 VICTOR KADANKOV EXIT FROM AN INTERVAL BY A DIFFERENCE OF TWO RENEWAL PROCESSES Integral transforms of the joint distribution of the first exit time from an interval, the value of the overshoot through a boundary, and the value of a linear component at the epoch of the exit are determined for the difference of two renewal processes. 1. Main definitions Let η, ξ, κ, δ ∈ (0,∞) be positive random variables. By F (x) = P [ η ≤ x ], G(y) = P [ ξ ≤ y ] we denote the distribution functions of the random variables η, ξ. Introduce the sequences {η, ηn}, {ξ, ξn}, n ∈ N, of independent identically distributed variables and, for x, y ≥ 0, define the random sequences η0(x) = 0, η1(x) = ηx, ηn+1(x) = ηx + η1 + · · · + ηn, n ∈ N, ξ0(y) = 0, ξ1(y) = ξy , ξn+1(y) = ξy + ξ1 + · · · + ξn, n ∈ N,(1) where ηx, ξy are the random variables given by their distribution functions P [ ηx ≤ u ] = F (x + u) − F (x) 1 − F (x) , P [ ξy ≤ v ] = G(y + v) − G(y) 1 − G(y) , u, v ≥ 0. For all x, y ≥ 0, we define the renewal processes generated by sequences (1): αy(t) = max {n ∈ N ∪ 0 : ξn(y) ≤ t }, βx(t) = max {n ∈ N ∪ 0 : ηn(x) ≤ t }. Introduce the monotone independent random walks generated by κ, δ: κ0 = 0, κn = κ ′ 1 + · · · + κ ′ n, δ0 = 0, δn = δ′1 + · · · + δ′n, n ∈ N. Here, {κ, κ ′ n}, {δ, δ′n}, n ∈ N, are the sequences of independent identically distributed random variables. Define the right-continuous step process (2) {Dxy(t)}{t≥0} = καy(t) − δβx(t) ∈ R, x, y ≥ 0; Dxy(0) = 0. This process takes positive jumps at the epochs ξn(y), n ∈ N, of the value κ ′ n. At the epochs ηn(x) n ∈ N, there occur negative jumps of the value δ′n. Let {Dxy(t) }{t≥0} be the difference of two renewal processes. Note that this process is not Markovian (apart from the case where η, ξ are exponentially distributed). For all t ≥ 0, we introduce the right-continuous linear components (3) η + x (t) = { t + x, 0 ≤ t < ηx, t − ηβx(t)(x), t ≥ ηx ∈ R+, x ≥ 0, (4) ξ + y (t) = { t + y, 0 ≤ t < ξy, t − ξαy(t)(y), t ≥ ξy ∈ R+, y ≥ 0. 2000 AMS Mathematics Subject Classification. Primary 60G40, 60K20. Key words and phrases. Exit problem, difference of two renewal processes, successive iterations. 92 EXIT FROM AN INTERVAL BY A DIFFERENCE 93 The process {η + x (t)}{t≥0} increases linearly on the intervals [ηn(x), ηn+1(x)), n ∈ N ∪ 0, and vanishes to zero at the epochs ηn(x), n ∈ N. The value of the process at the time t0 ≥ ηx is the time elapsed since the last negative jump of the process {Dxy(t)}{t≥0} till t0. The process {ξ + x (t)}{t≥0} increases linearly on the interval [ξn(x), ξn+1(x)), n ∈ N∪0, and vanishes to zero at the epochs ξn(x), n ∈ N. The value of the process at the time t0 ≥ ξx is the time elapsed since the last positive jump of the process {Dxy(t)}{t≥0} till t0. Define a right-continuous Markov process (5) Y t xy = { Dxy(t), η + x (t), ξ + y (t) } {t≥0} ∈ R × R 2 +, Y 0 xy = {0, x, y}, x, y ≥ 0, accompanying (governing) the process {Dxy(t)}{t≥0}. The so defined process is a Markov process which is homogeneous in the first component [1]. If, at the instant t0, Y t0 xy = {k, u, v}, then the future behaviour of the process {Y t xy}{t≥t0} does not depend on the value k of the first component, and the first negative jump of the process {Dxy(t)}{t≥t0} of the value δ occurs after the random time ηu has elapsed, and the process {Dxy(t)}{t≥t0} will take the first positive jump of the value κ after the time ξv has elapsed. For k ∈ R+, we define τk xy = inf { t : Dxy(t) > k }, T k xy = Dxy(τk xy) − k, ηk xy = η + x (τk xy) which are the first passage time of the upper level k by the process {Dxy(t)}{t≥0}, the value of the overshoot through the upper level k, and the value of the linear component η + x (·) at the passage instant. Note that the overleap of the upper level can take place only at the epochs ξn(y), n ∈ N, and, in view of (4), ξ + y (τk xy) = 0. Similarly, for k ∈ R+, we introduce the random variables τxy k = inf { t : Dxy(t) < −k }, T xy k = −Dxy(τ xy k ) − k, ξxy k = ξ + y (τxy k ) which are the first passage time of the lower level −k by the process {Dxy(t)}{t≥0}, the value of the overshoot, and the value of the linear component ξ + y (·) at the passage instant. Observe that the overleap of the lower level occurs at the epochs ηn(x), n ∈ N, and, in view of (3), η + x (τxy k ) = 0. Note, that the random variables τk xy, τxy k are the Markov times of the process {Y t xy}{t≥0}, because they take values from countable sets { ξn(y), n ∈ N}, { ηn(x), n ∈ N}. The integral transforms of the joint distributions (6) { τk xy, T k xy, ηk xy } , {τxy k , T xy k , ξxy k } , k, x, y ∈ R+, have been obtained in [2] in terms of the solutions of integral equations. For particular types of the process {Y t xy}{t≥0}, the integral transforms of distribution (6) have been studied in [3]–[6] and also in [8], [9]. We assume that the integral transforms of the joint distributions of the boundary functionals (6) are known, and we will solve the two- boundary problem for the process {Dxy(t)}{t≥0} in terms of these integral transforms. 2 Exit of the process {Dxy(t)}{t≥0} from the interval Let us fix B ≥ 0, k ∈ [0, B], r = B − k, Y 0 xy = {0, x, y}, x, y ≥ 0, and introduce the random variable χ = inf { t : Dxy(t) /∈ [−r, k] } as the first exit time from the interval [−r, k] by the process {Dxy(t)}{t≥0}. This ran- dom variable is the Markov time of the process {Y t xy}{t≥0}, since it takes values from a countable set { ξn(y), n ∈ N} ∪ { ηn(x), n ∈ N}. Note that the exit can take place either through the upper boundary k, or through the lower boundary −r. We introduce the events A k = {Dxy(χ) > k } when the process exits the interval by crossing the upper 94 VICTOR KADANKOV boundary and Ar = {Dxy(χ) < −r } when the process exits the interval by crossing the lower boundary. Define the random variable, X = (Dxy(χ) − k) IA k + (−Dxy(χ) − r) IAr , L = η + x (χ) IA k + ξ + y (χ) IAr which are the value of the overshoot through the interval [−r, k] by the process {Dxy(t)}{t≥0} at the epoch of the first exit and the value of the linear component at the exit epoch, where IA = IA(ω) is the indicator function of the set A. Denote fk xy(du, dl, s) = E [ exp{−sτk xy}; T k xy ∈ du, ηk xy ∈ dl ] , k, x, y ≥ 0, fxy k (du, dl, s) = E [ exp{−sτxy k }; T xy k ∈ du, ξxy k ∈ dl] , k, x, y ≥ 0, V + s (du, dl) = E [ e−sχ; X ∈ du, L ∈ dl, A k ], V − s (du, dl) = E [ e−sχ; X ∈ du, L ∈ dl, Ar ] . Theorem 1. Let B ≥ 0, k ∈ [0, B], r = B − k, Y 0 xy = {0, x, y}, x, y ≥ 0. Then the Laplace transforms V ± s (du, dl) of the joint distribution of {χ, X, L }, being the first exit time from the interval [−r, k] by the process {Dxy(t)}{t≥0}, the value of overshoot through the boundary, and the value of the linear component at the exit epoch, satisfy the equalities V + s (du, dl) = F+ xy(k, du, dl, s) + ∫∫ R 2 + F+ xy(k, du1, dl1, s)K+ u1l1 (du, dl, s), V − s (du, dl) = F− xy(k, du, dl, s) + ∫∫ R 2 + F− xy(r, du1, dl1, s)K− u1l1 (du, dl, s),(7) where F+ xy(k, du, dl, s) = fk xy(du, dl, s) − ∫∫ R 2 + fxy r (du1, dl1, s) fu1+B 0l1 (du, dl, s), F− xy(r, du, dl, s) = fxy r (du, dl, s) − ∫∫ R 2 + fk xy(du1, dl1, s) f l10 u1+B(du, dl, s); K± u1l1 (du, dl, s) = ∞∑ n=1 K± u1l1 (du, dl, s)∗(n) are the series of iterations K± u1l1 (du, dl, s)∗(n); K± u1l1 (du, dl, s)∗(1) = K± u1l1 (du, dl, s), K± u1l1 (du, dl, s)∗(n+1) = ∫∫ R 2 + K± u1l1 (du2, dl2, s)K± u2l2 (du, dl, s)∗(n), n ∈ N,(8) are the successive iterations of the kernels K± u1l1 (du, dl, s) which are given by the formulae K+ u1l1 (du, dl, s) = ∫∫ R 2 + f l10 u1+B(du2, dl2, s) fu2+B 0l2 (du, dl, s), K− u1l1 (du, dl, s) = ∫∫ R 2 + fu1+B 0l1 (du2, dl2, s) f l20 u2+B(du, dl, s).(9) Proof. The integral transforms of the joint distribution of the first exit time and the value of the overshoot through the boundaries have been determined for the processes with independent increments and random walks in [7]. These integral transforms were obtained in terms of the distributions of one-boundary functionals of the process and the random walk. We used the idea (utilizing the one-boundary functional of the process) and the method (solving a system of linear integral equations) for this problem in the EXIT FROM AN INTERVAL BY A DIFFERENCE 95 case where the process is a difference of two renewal processes. Following this framework, we derive a system of integral equations to determine the function V ± s (du, dl) : fk xy(du, dl, s) = V + s (du, dl) + ∫∫ R 2 + V − s (du1, dl1) fu1+B 0l1 (du, dl, s), fxy r (du, dl, s) = V − s (du, dl) + ∫∫ R 2 + V + s (du1, dl1) f l10 u1+B(du, dl, s).(10) To derive these equations, we applied the total probability law and also used the fact that the process {Y t xy}{t≥0} is homogeneous in the first component and τk xy, τxy k , and χ are Markov times. To get the first equation of (10), observe that the first crossing through the upper boundary k by the process {Dxy(t)}{t≥0} (the expression on the left-hand side of the equation) occurs on a sample path which does not intersect the lower level −r (the first term on the right-hand side) or on the path which does intersect the lower level −r and then crosses the upper boundary k (the second term on the right-hand side). The second equation is derived analogously. This system of integral equations is similar to a system of linear equations with two variables. Substituting the expression for V − s (du, dl) from the second equation into the first one yields V + s (du, dl) = fk xy(du, dl, s) − ∫∫ R 2 + fxy r (du1, dl1, s) fu1+B 0l1 (du, dl, s)+ + ∫∫ u1,l1∈R 2 + ∫∫ u2,l2∈R 2 + V + s (du2, dl2) f l20 u2+B(du1, dl1, s) fu1+B 0l1 (du, dl, s). Changing the order of integration in the third term of the right-hand side of this equation, we obtain a linear integral equation for the function V + s (du, dl): (11) V + s (du, dl) = F+ xy(k, du, dl, s) + ∫∫ R 2 + V + s (du1, dl1)K+ u1l1 (du, dl, s). Here, K+ u1l1 (du, dl, s) = ∫∫ R 2 + f l10 u1+B(du2, dl2, s) fu2+B 0l2 (du, dl, s) is the kernel of this equation. Observe that the random variable τx0 k takes values from the set {ηn(x), n ∈ N}. Therefore, for s > 0, fx0 k (du, dl, s) ≤ E exp{−sτx0 k } ≤ fx(s) ≤ f∗(s), where fx(s) = E exp{−sηx} and f∗(s) = supx≥0 fx(s). The analogous estimation is valid for the function fk 0y(du, dl, s) : fk 0y(du, dl, s) ≤ E exp{−sτk 0y} ≤ gy(s) ≤ g∗(s), where gy(s) = E exp{−sξy}, g∗(s) = supy≥0 gy(s). Then, for s > s0 > 0, the kernel K+ u1l1 (du, dl, s) satisfies the estimation K+ u1l1 (du, dl, s) ≤ f∗(s) g∗(s) ≤ λ = f∗(s0) g∗(s0) < 1, s0 > 0. Utilizing formula (8) defining the successive iterations of this kernel by the method of mathematical induction, we get, for s > s0 > 0, K+ u1l1 (du, dl, s)∗(n+1) < λn+1, n ∈ N. Then the series of successive iterations converges uniformly with respect to u1, l1, u, l ∈ R+, s > s0, and K+ u1l1 (du, dl, s) < λ(1 − λ)−1. 96 VICTOR KADANKOV Therefore, we can apply the method of successive iterations [10] to solve the linear integral equation (11). This yields the first equality of the theorem. The second equality of the theorem can be proved analogously. Bibliography 1. I.I. Ezhov and A.V. Skorokhod, Markov processes which are homogeneous in the second com- ponent, Theor. Prob. and its Appl. 14 (1969), 679–692. 2. T.I. Nasirova, Processes of Semi-Markov Walk, “ELM”, Baku, 1984. 3. I.I. Ezhov, On distribution of the queue length of a classical system G|G|1 with discrete time, Reports of Russian Academy of Sci. 332 (1993), no. 4, 408–410. 4. I.I. Ezhov and V.F. Kadankov, The queueing system G |G|1 with batch arrivals, Theor. Probab. Math. Statist. 64 (2001), 17–33. 5. I.I. Ezhov and V.F. Kadankov, Fundamental probability characteristics of the queueing system G |G|1, Random Oper. and Stoch. Equ. 9 (2001), no. 2, 1–18. 6. I.I. Ezhov and V.F. Kadankov, System G|G |1 with batch servicing of claims, Ukr. Math. J. 54 (2002), no. 4, 447–465. 7. V.F. Kadankov and T.V. Kadankova, On the distribution of the first exit time from an interval and the value of overshoot through the boundaries for processes with independent increments and random walks, Ukr. Math. J. 57 (2005), no. 10, 1359–1384. 8. B. Pirdzhanov, Semi-Markov random walk on the convolution of two renewal processes, Ukr. Math. J. 42 (1990), no. 11, 1500–1508. 9. N.S. Bratiychuk and B. Pirdzhanov, Busy period of the queueing system GI|G|1, Reports of the National Academy of Sci. of Ukraine 9 (1991), 48–51. 10. I.G. Petrovsky, Lectures on the Theory of Integral Equations, Nauka, Moscow, 1965. E-mail : kadankov@voliacable.com
id nasplib_isofts_kiev_ua-123456789-4429
institution Digital Library of Periodicals of National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine
issn 0321-3900
language English
last_indexed 2025-12-07T17:49:58Z
publishDate 2005
publisher Інститут математики НАН України
record_format dspace
spelling Kadankov, V.
2009-11-09T15:34:47Z
2009-11-09T15:34:47Z
2005
Exit from an interval by a difference of two renewal processes / V. Kadankov // Theory of Stochastic Processes. — 2005. — Т. 11 (27), № 3-4. — С. 92–96. — Бібліогр.: 10 назв.— англ.
0321-3900
https://nasplib.isofts.kiev.ua/handle/123456789/4429
519.21
Integral transforms of the joint distribution of the first exit time from an interval,&#xd; the value of the overshoot through a boundary, and the value of a linear component&#xd; at the epoch of the exit are determined for the difference of two renewal processes.
en
Інститут математики НАН України
Exit from an interval by a difference of two renewal processes
Article
published earlier
spellingShingle Exit from an interval by a difference of two renewal processes
Kadankov, V.
title Exit from an interval by a difference of two renewal processes
title_full Exit from an interval by a difference of two renewal processes
title_fullStr Exit from an interval by a difference of two renewal processes
title_full_unstemmed Exit from an interval by a difference of two renewal processes
title_short Exit from an interval by a difference of two renewal processes
title_sort exit from an interval by a difference of two renewal processes
url https://nasplib.isofts.kiev.ua/handle/123456789/4429
work_keys_str_mv AT kadankovv exitfromanintervalbyadifferenceoftworenewalprocesses